Characterizing the Ionization Potential Depression in Dense Carbon Plasmas with High-Precision Spectrally Resolved X-Ray Scattering

Characterizing the Ionization Potential Depression in Dense Carbon Plasmas with High-Precision Spectrally Resolved X-Ray Scattering

Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion PAPER Characterizing the ionization potential depression in dense carbon plasmas with high-precision spectrally resolved x-ray scattering To cite this article: D Kraus et al 2019 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 61 014015 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 137.110.7.132 on 03/06/2020 at 17:25 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 61 (2019) 014015 (6pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aadd6c Characterizing the ionization potential depression in dense carbon plasmas with high-precision spectrally resolved x-ray scattering D Kraus1,2 , B Bachmann3, B Barbrel4, R W Falcone4, L B Fletcher5, S Frydrych6, E J Gamboa5, M Gauthier5, D O Gericke7, S H Glenzer5, S Göde5, E Granados5, N J Hartley1,8, J Helfrich6, H J Lee5, B Nagler5, A Ravasio9, W Schumaker5, J Vorberger1 and T Döppner3 1 Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstr. 400, D-01328 Dresden, Germany 2 Institute of Solid State and Materials Physics, Technische Universität Dresden, D-01069 Dresden, Germany 3 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, United States of America 4 Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States of America 5 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94309, United States of America 6 Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schlossgartenstraße9, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany 7 Centre for Fusion, Space and Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom 8 Open and Transdisciplinary Research Institute, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan 9 LULI, UMR7605, CNRS-CEA, Université Paris VI-Ecole Polytechnique, F-91128Palaiseau Cedex, France E-mail: [email protected] Received 9 July 2018, revised 22 August 2018 Accepted for publication 29 August 2018 Published 13 November 2018 Abstract We discuss the possibility of obtaining highly precise measurements of the ionization potential depression in dense plasmas with spectrally resolved x-ray scattering, while simultaneously determining the electron temperature and the free electron density. A proof-of-principle experiment at the Linac Coherent Light Source, probing isochorically heated carbon samples, demonstrates the capabilities of this method and motivates future experiments at x-ray free electron laser facilities. Keywords: warm dense matter, dense plasma, ionization potential depression, x-ray scattering (Some figures may appear in colour only in the online journal) 1. Introduction bound states, and accordingly the ionization balance, are modified by the interaction with the surrounding medium. In The complex properties of dense plasmas play a crucial role particular, the influence of neighboring ions and screening in our understanding of celestial bodies like giant planets, due to continuum electrons results in reduced binding brown dwarfs and stars as well as scientific and technological strength, which can be modeled by introducing effective applications like intense laser-matter interaction (both optical (lower) ionization energies (ionization potential depression and x-ray), fusion energy studies and radiation damage (IPD)). Although a precise description of the complex inter- research [1]. For such systems, ionization is a key quantity action of a dense plasma including bound states remains that is very challenging to describe since in dense matter, the difficult, the Stewart and Pyatt model [2], which interpolates 0741-3335/19/014015+06$33.00 1 © 2018 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 61 (2019) 014015 D Kraus et al between well-known low-density, high-temperature (Debye– mixtures with light elements that are of high relevance for Hueckel) and high-density, low-temperature (ion sphere) astrophysics [14] and fusion applications [15]. limits, is thought to catch most of the essential physics and is Many of the characteristic properties of dense plasmas widely applied. However, several experiments have recently are accessible by spectrally resolved x-ray scattering. In challenged this method, indicating a significantly larger general, the scattered radiation power spectrum per solid depression of the ionization energy [3–5], whereas other angle is given by [16] results are in line with this description [6]. This controversy dP 2 22 [ – ] =-Ir0 0 ()()()1cossinfq NSk ,, w 1 motivated several more advanced model approaches 7 10 , dWw but so far, no final convergence has been reached [11]. where I is the initial probe intensity, r the classical electron What is still lacking to resolve these discrepancies are 0 0 radius, f the FEL polarization angle, θ the scattering angle, experiments which can precisely measure electron temper- and N the number of atoms in the probe volume. S(k, ω) ature, free electron density (ionization) and IPD at the same denotes the electron structure factor in dependence of scat- time. In this article, we discuss dense carbon plasmas as an tering wave number k and frequency shift ω, and contains the example and show very promising capabilities of high-pre- microscopic properties of the sample. In a plasma, x-rays cision spectrally resolved x-ray scattering, as now enabled by either scatter from single electrons (non-collective scattering) x-ray free electron lasers, to address present controversies on or from collective fluctuations of many electrons (collective this topic. Dense plasma environments can be created by scattering), depending on the scattering geometry applied in ultrafast isochoric heating with these highly brilliant x-ray the experiment [17]. The scattering parameter sources [12]. Moreover, the x-rays can be applied to simul- 1 taneously characterize a set of plasma properties, particularly a = ()2 the IPD as well as ionization and electron temperature, with kls high-precision in situ spectrally resolved x-ray scattering. relates the scattering wave number k to the plasma screening λ ( ) After introducing the basic concepts of this measurement length s e.g. Debye length for an ideal plasma . A scattering α= fi technique focussing on the IPD measurement of dense carbon parameter of 1denes the regime of non-collective α plasmas, we discuss a corresponding proof-of-principle scattering whereas 1 results in collective scattering. For a experiment on isochorically heated graphite that was recently non-collective scattering geometry, the structure factor is ( performed at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) of often split into three separate contributions Chihara decom- [ ]) SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and provides a first position 18 : step forward towards future high-precision experiments. Sk(),,,.3wdww=++ Wel ()() k W b-- f () k W f f ()() k w Here, the first term describes elastic scattering, which is dominated by scattering from tightly bound electrons. The second term accounts for the inelastic scattering from weakly 2. Basic concepts bound electrons and the third term describes inelastic scat- tering from free electrons. In general, design and analysis of Carbon has the highest melting temperature of all elements spectrally resolved x-ray scattering experiments on dense and is of high interest for isochoric heating experiments. Cold plasmas need to be handled with care since a detailed data carbon is dominated by electronic band structure and only the evaluation usually requires several model assumptions. For K-shell electrons can be treated in an atomic approximation. example, the Chihara decomposition can become problematic When entering the warm dense matter regime at a few for plasmas of such extreme density that bound and free fi [ ] thousand kelvins, signi cant bonding remains 13 , while electrons can hardly be distinguished. Moreover, in experi- some of the L-shell electrons may be treated atomically before ments on extremely short timescales and with large gradients, fi reaching signi cant ionization at higher temperatures. In the one cannot apply local thermal equilibrium assumptions. dense plasma regime with temperatures of several eV, plasma Nevertheless, for a carefully chosen sample and scattering physics can be applied to describe the system via ionic bound geometry, several physical quantities can be deduced from a states, free electrons and IPD. In addition, carbon is probably single scattering spectrum. Particularly, these properties allow the most practical low-Z material for experiments on dense for deducing the IPD (bound-free feature), ionization Z (free- plasma properties. In contrast to hydrogen, helium, nitrogen, free feature in relation to elastic scattering and/or bound-free oxygen, etc, it exists in a solid state at ambient conditions, scattering) and electron temperature Te (Doppler broadening which simplifies the experimental creation of solid-density of free-free feature) from a model fit to a measured spectrum. plasmas. Moreover, its two ambient polymorphs, graphite Furthermore, the ion correlations can be inferred from the − − (ρ=2.2 g cm 3) and diamond (ρ=3.5 g cm 3) allow for ratio of elastic and inelastic scattering, which is highly sen- accessing conditions of different density by simply switching sitive to structural transitions, such as melting [19–21]. between these two forms of carbon as initial material. To model the IPD for the creation of synthetic x-ray Furthermore, carbon is not as hazardous and not as difficult to scattering spectra, we apply two analytical models that have handle as, e.g., beryllium or lithium. By using organic com- been extensively used in recent studies: Stewart–Pyatt [2] and pounds as sample material, carbon can easily be studied in Ecker–Kroell [22]. The Stewart–Pyatt approach interpolates 2 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 61 (2019) 014015 D Kraus et al 3. Synthetic scattering spectra Figures 1 and 2 show synthetic non-collective scattering spectra for 5.9 keV photon probe energy at a scattering angle of θ=160◦ (k=5.9 Å−1, α ∼ 0.2) for varying ionization (figure 1) and electron temperature (figure 2) calculated by the XRS code [23] using an estimated instrument function com- bining the LCLS bandwidth in self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE) mode and the resolution of the x-ray spectrometer.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us