JJ~W~ Iloo ~OO R.10000~~ Lb@OOID@OO ID@~@I]}®OO (Hackney)

JJ~W~ Iloo ~OO R.10000~~ Lb@OOID@OO ID@~@I]}®OO (Hackney)

JJ~W~ ilOO ~OO r.10000~~ Lb@OOID@OO ID@~@I]}®OO (Hackney) A Study of the Jewish Population of the London Borough of Hackney based upon the 1971census By Barry A. Kosmin and Nigel Grizzard RESEARCH UNIT THE BOARD OF DEPUTIES OF BRITISH JEWS RESEARCH UNIT BOARD OF DEPUTIES OF BRITISH JEWS JEWS IN AN INNER LONDON BOROUGH: A Study of the Jewish population of the London Borough of Hackney based on the 1971 Census by Barry A. Kosmin and Nigel Grizzard The Board of Deputies of British Jews, founded in 1760, is the representative body of the Anglo- Jewish community. The Research Unit was established in 1965 following a conference on 'Jewish Life in Modern Britain' which the Board convened in 1962 in association with the Insti- tute of Contemporary Jewry of the Hebrew University, Jerusalem. The Unit compiles statistical data in various aspects of the community, and prepares interpretive studies of trends. It func- tions under a special Committee of the Board, comprising the Honorary Officers and lay mem- bers and academic advisers. COMMITTEE 1975 DR. J. BRAUDE (Acting Chairman) ALDERMAN THE RT. HON. THE LORD FISHER OF CAMDEN, J.P., F.C.I.S. THE HON. GREVILLE JANNER, Q.C., M.P. DR. S. LEVENBERG E. J. N. NABARRO, J.P., F.C.A. A. S. DIAMOND, M.A., LL.D., M.M. H. DIAMOND, J.P. PROFESSOR M. FREEDMAN PROFESSOR S. J. GOULD S. S. LEVIN, LL.B. PROFESSOR S. J. PRAIS DR. S. J. ROTH MRS. M. SCHMOOL, M.Sc. S. TEFF, B.A. MRS. RUTH WINSTON-FOX, J.P. Executive Director: DR. BARRY KOSMIN Research Officer: NIGEL GRIZZARD, B.Sc. Secretary of the Board: ABRAHAM J. MARKS Woburn House, Upper Woburn Place, London, WCIH OEP 1 •• TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1- Methodology Tables London Borough of Hackney Census The problem 5 and Voter Statistics 7 Finding an acceptable methodological concept for solving the problem 5 II Description of., sample EDs 9 Choosing a suitable geographical area ",' 5 III Population statistics o~ sample EDS 9 IV Jewish population age cohorts per mille Establishing a universe 5 by housing type 13 Identification of ethnicr names on the voters' roll ' 7 V Jewish population of Hackney by housing type 15 Preparing a sample 8 VI Hackney. JeWi$.h households by' hqusing Fieldw&k 11 'type ',,', "_ 15 VII Crude birth rate 16 Part II - Demographic Characte'ristics VIII Fertility ratio 16 IX Comparative age ratios 1956-71 16 Estimating the total populati:on., _ . l~ X ComparativefertiJity rates for Jewish j Household size 13 females over 25 year periods 16 Age structure 15 XI Children ever born per 100 married Reproductive rates 15 women 17 Death,·laie. 17 XII Comparative data on children ever born per 100 married women in areas With" Populatiori ' projection 17 high Jewish concentrations _ 17 .,. ~;- XIII Estimate oftha' number of 'deaths among part IIL ...- Social Patterns the Hackney Jewish popul{l.tion in 1971 using a 5 year av~rage of'age s~cific" Spatial dfstribution 19 deaths for England and \V:ales, ....17 BiIthplace .'. 21 XIV Natural change Of popullltfon 18 V Household characteristics, 22 XV London Borough of Hackney war!i populations, 1971 19 ~~}e:wish ag~d 23 XVI Comparative ethnic concentrations' ,in Cortrfnunie-ations 23 Hackney 20 XVII Persons with neither parent ' U.K. or Part IV - Economic activity and New Commonwealth-born 21 Occupational Patterns XVIII Birthplace by ED housing types 21 XIX Immigrants and first generation British The dependency ratio 25 by percentage 21 The economically active population 25 XX Percentage distribution of household size Local employment 25 by housing-type 22 Industrial classification of employment 26 XXI Hackney Borough economically active Self-employment 27 population per mille by industry and socia-economic group 27 Socio-economic groups 28 XXII Hackney Jewish economically active a) All economically active persons 29 population per mille by industry and b) Male earners 29 socio-economic group 27 c) Female earners 30 XXIII Self-employment by industry in per- Educational qualifications 30 centiles 27 XXIV Brief definitions of the socio-economic groups 28 Part V - Jewish Communal Life in Hackney XXV Percentage of SEGs with higher educa- tional qualifications 30 ___ A history of Jewish settlement 31 Synagogues and affiliation 33 Maps and Charts Ancillary religious facilities 34 London Boroughs 4 Social Welfare 34 Wards of the London Borough of Hackney 6 Educational facilities 35 ,fewish residential patterns in Hackney 1971 10 Public life 35 Jewish population of London Borough of Hackney 1971 14 Postscript 36 Hackney Borough population by percentage and age cohorts. Comparison of general popul- Appendix ation and accommodation weighted Jewish population 14 Small Area Statistics 100% Population 1971· The socio-economic groups of economically census print-out 37 active males 29 100% Households 1971 census print-out 38 Membership of _ the New Synagogue, a con- 10% Sample Economic Actiyity' i~71 . Census stituent member of the United Synagogue, print-out 39 1949-73 32 2 •• Abbreviations Used in Text DJN Distinctive Jewish name ED Enumeration district G.C.E. General Certificate of Education GLC Greater London Council H.M.S.O. Her Majesty's Stationary Office H.N.C. Higher National Certificate L.C.C. London County Council LQ Location quotient M.P. Member of Parliament NC New Commonwealth OPCS Office of Population Censuses and Surveys SAS Small area statistics SEG Socia-economic group U.K. United Kingdom U.S.A. United States of America U.S.S.R. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their thanks to the following organisations for their assistance:- Intelligence Unit, Greater London Council Planning Department, London Borough of Hackney Membership Department, United Synagogue OPCS for allowing the authors permission to re- produce the Census Print-Out Sheets and also to all the Hackney residents past and present who gave of their time. 3 THE LONDON BOROUGHS Bromley 0 4 12 kilometres I I I I I FI I I I i 0 2 4 6 8 miles ~ Inner Boroughs D Outer Boroughs 4 Part One METHODOLOGY The Problem istic estimate, in the widest sense, of the distribution of London Jewry. 2 The lack of an official religious or communal census, has meant that until the present time, Choosing a Suitable Geographical Area the Jewish demographic studies that have been undertaken in Britain by this Unit were solely of As a further check on the validity of these a global nature, producing results of vital statistics, estimates for the 1970s a variant of the Distinctive as well as gross totals of Jews, but only from Jewish name method (DJN)3 was used to estimate unofficial s()urces or by indirect methods. Most the number of Jewish households in the 32 London of these studies relied for their information on Boroughs.4 Using the membership data of the Jewish sources such as synagogue statistics, which London-based United Synagogue which has over were often inaccurate and out of date. 40,000 members it was found that the incidence The need for accurate statistics in order to plan of the surname Cohen was one in fifty. It could amenities such as schools, youth clubs, old age therefore be assumed that, disregarding generational homes, and other communal facilities is well known ethnic name attrition, Cohens represented two and appreciated, but no material has so far been per cent of the Jewish population of London. The produced that will shed any useful light on such 1973 London Telephone Directory was then analysed problems. The difficulties of initiating a large-scale and the number of Cohen households distributed survey amongst the community are many and first by postal district and then by borough. The include among others, lack of time, finance, postal district with the largest number on the Cohen expertise, and resources. Another often underrated count was N.16, that is Stoke Newington and problem is that of obtaining co-operation from Stamford Hill. with 108. When the counts for the local leaders and those persons to be surveyed. other districts of Hackney Borough were added Moreover because of the differences in the demo- the grand total was 214. This figure suggested that graphic make-up of the Jewish popUlation in in 1973 there were in the order of 10,700 Jewish different areas,it is unlikely that gross totals households in the Borough. would be of much use for the aforementioned The Cohen count also suggested that in Hackney tasks. It is thus necessary to put this type of study the ethnicity factor with regard to surnames was into a workable and coherent geographical higher than in the outer London boroughs such framework. as Barnet, Brent or Redbridge where there were also known to be large Jewish concentrations. It Finding an Acceptable Methodological Concept for was then decided to use the Borough of Hackney Solving the Problem which had a long history of Jewish settlement, as the focus of our experiment. The Borough was It was determined that at this stage it would formed in the reorganisation of local government in be impossible to undertake our own survey of London in 1965, by the amalgamation of the former the Jewish population, either of the country or any Metropolitan Boroughs of Hackney, Shoreditch and large centre, so it was decided to concentrate our Stoke Newington, and covers the postal districts efforts on a compact and accessible geographical of N.16, E.5, E.8, E.9, and parts of N.I. N.4, area with a large number of Jews. After some and E.2. reflection, we directed our efforts towards finding some way of using official statistics from the 1971 Establishing a Universe Census, since this information was readily and cheaply available, accurate, and afforded general The lack of previous detailed work along the comparability.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    41 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us