IMPACT of the LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION on FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY and COMPOSITION of MARINE ECOSYSTEMS by ALEXANDER M

IMPACT of the LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION on FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY and COMPOSITION of MARINE ECOSYSTEMS by ALEXANDER M

[Palaeontology, Vol. 61, Part 1, 2018, pp. 133–148] IMPACT OF THE LATE TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION ON FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY AND COMPOSITION OF MARINE ECOSYSTEMS by ALEXANDER M. DUNHILL1 , WILLIAM J. FOSTER2, JAMES SCIBERRAS3 and RICHARD J. TWITCHETT4 1School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; [email protected] 2Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA 3Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, BA2 7AY, UK 4Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK Typescript received 23 June 2017; accepted in revised form 15 September 2017 Abstract: Mass extinctions have profoundly influenced the the extinction event was, however, highly selective against history of life, not only through the death of species but also some modes of life, in particular sessile suspension feeders. through changes in ecosystem function and structure. Impor- Although taxa with heavily calcified skeletons suffered higher tantly, these events allow us the opportunity to study ecologi- extinction than other taxa, lightly calcified taxa also appear to cal dynamics under levels of environmental stress for which have been selected against. The extinction appears to have there are no recent analogues. Here, we examine the impact invigorated the already ongoing faunal turnover associated and selectivity of the Late Triassic mass extinction event on with the Mesozoic Marine Revolution. The ecological effects the functional diversity and functional composition of the glo- of the Late Triassic mass extinction were preferentially felt in bal marine ecosystem, and test whether post-extinction com- the tropical latitudes, especially amongst reefs, and it took munities in the Early Jurassic represent a regime shift away until the Middle Jurassic for reef ecosystems to fully recover to from pre-extinction communities in the Late Triassic. Our pre-extinction levels. analyses show that, despite severe taxonomic losses, there is no unequivocal loss of global functional diversity associated with Key words: mass extinction, Triassic, Jurassic, functional the extinction. Even though no functional groups were lost, diversity, niche, regime shift. T HE Late Triassic mass extinction event (LTE), which to understanding mass extinction events (Barnosky et al. occurred ~201.6 million years ago (Blackburn et al. 2013), 2012; Aberhan & Kiessling 2015). The LTE has been under- is the second biggest biodiversity loss (Alroy 2010) and the studied in comparison with other major Phanerozoic biotic third biggest ecological crisis (McGhee et al. 2004) since crises (Twitchett 2006) and, despite the importance of the Cambrian. The proposed mechanism for the crisis was functional diversity changes or ecological regime shifts on CO2-induced environmental changes, including global ecosystem function, a palaeoecological perspective on long- warming (McElwain et al. 1999; Wignall 2001), sea-level term trends through deep-time, including the effects of changes (Hallam 1981), ocean anoxia (Hallam & Wignall mass extinctions, is still lacking (Villeger et al. 2011). Con- 2000; Jaraula et al. 2013) and ocean acidification (Haut- sequently, little is known about the ecological impact of the mann 2004; Hautmann et al. 2008a) as a result of the erup- LTE, aside from the preferential extinction of tropical taxa tion of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Large Igneous inhabiting shallow marine environments, particularly Province (CAMP) (Whiteside et al. 2010; Blackburn et al. hypercalcifiers, and the subsequent reef crisis in the Early 2013). This makes the LTE an attractive candidate for Jurassic (Kiessling & Aberhan 2007; Kiessling et al. 2007; drawing ecological comparisons with the current anthro- Kiessling & Simpson 2011). pogenically-driven biodiversity decline. Recognizing when Understanding the nature and patterns of extinction ecosystems reach a threshold in response to environmental selectivity during this event may help in better under- pressures, resulting in a change in ecosystem structure standing the cause(s) of the event, and/or may help pin- often characterized by a shift in dominance among organ- point sampling biases or deficiencies. Selective loss of reef isms with different modes of life (i.e. a regime shift) is key ecosystems is a common outcome of past biotic crises ©The Authors. doi: 10.1111/pala.12332 133 Palaeontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Palaeontological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 134 PALAEONTOLOGY, VOLUME 61 € driven by CO2-induced environmental change (Flugel Database (PaleoDB) on 13 April 2016 (Clapham et al. 2002; Veron 2008; Kiessling & Simpson 2011; Foster & 2016; Dunhill et al. 2017). This database consists of Twitchett 2014) and may be interpreted as a consequence 55 608 occurrences of 2615 genera compiled at stage of their sensitivity to environmental change. Apart from level. Filtering protocols were used to exclude ichnotaxa, selection against specific regions, ecosystems or habitats form taxa and any uncertain generic assignments (e.g. (Foster & Twitchett, 2014), other studies have suggested aff., cf., ex gr., sensu lato, ‘[quotation marks]’, and ‘infor- that traits such as skeletal composition, motility and feed- mal’). Although there is concern that some of the data ing are also critical in explaining patterns of selectivity. within the PaleoDB is inaccurate in terms of taxonomic Past extinction events associated with elevated CO2 have and stratigraphic assignment, a number of studies have been shown to be selective against epifaunal, sessile, sus- shown that taxonomic errors in these datasets are ran- pension feeders (Bush & Bambach 2011; Foster & Twitch- domly distributed and have only minimal effects on long- ett 2014; Clapham 2017), and selective against heavily term diversification and extinction patterns (Miller 2000; calcified organisms (Hautmann 2004; Knoll et al. 2007; Peters 2007; Wagner et al. 2007; Miller & Foote 2009). Hautmann et al. 2008a; Clapham & Payne 2011; Kiessling Erroneous taxonomic and/or stratigraphic assignments & Simpson 2011; Bush & Pruss 2013; Payne et al. 2016a) were identified and corrected as far as was possible. This but as epifaunal, sessile suspension feeders tend to be process involved drawing on the expertise of the authors heavily calcified, it is unclear which of those traits is most and consultation with experts in specific taxonomic important. Also, apparent selectivity may simply be an groups where necessary (all cited in Acknowledgements artefact of preservation or sampling biases that may exist below). As well as systematic information, from phylum between different modes of life, at least regionally (Man- to generic level, information relating to palaeolongitude der & Twitchett 2008). and palaeolatitude, depositional environment, and both The main aim of this study is to understand the patterns chrono- and lithostratigraphy were downloaded. Strati- of diversity change and extinction selectivity in marine graphic assignments were made to the stage level, and ecosystems during the Triassic–Jurassic interval and, in par- Triassic and Jurassic occurrences falling outside of a Ladi- ticular, in relation to the LTE. In order to investigate the nian to Aalenian range were omitted from the data set. functional diversity of ecosystems and to study key traits Occurrences without stage-level designations were omit- such as feeding, tiering and motility, the ecospace model of ted. However, occurrence data do not capture Lazarus Bambach et al. (2007) was used to provide a quantitative taxa (i.e. an organism that disappears from the fossil autecological analysis of all known Middle Triassic to Middle record, often for millions of years, before reappearing Jurassic marine animal genera. This approach has been pre- unchanged; Flessa & Jablonski 1983) which can lead to viously successfully applied to analysis of the Cambrian radi- the overestimation of extinction rates, particularly across ation (Bambach et al. 2007), comparisons of Palaeozoic and major extinction events (Twitchett 2001). A second data- modern ecosystems (Bush et al. 2007; Villeger et al. 2011; base was therefore constructed by ranging-through 2844 Knope et al. 2015) and studies of both the late Permian genera between first and last occurrences at substage level (Dineen et al. 2014; Foster & Twitchett 2014) and end- derived from the PaleoDB and from Sepkoski et al. Cretaceous (Aberhan & Kiessling 2015) mass extinction (2002). To avoid edge effects in the range database, pre- events. The following individual hypotheses were tested: (1) Middle Triassic and post-Middle Jurassic occurrences in common with the Late Permian extinction (Foster & were used for determining the stratigraphic ranges of gen- Twitchett 2014), despite significant taxonomic losses, the era. This approach was used by Foster & Twitchett (2014) LTE did not result in a reduction in global functional diver- and compensates for the out-of-date nature of much of sity; (2) sessile suspension feeders were selected against, Sepkoski et al. (2002) such as truncation of generic ranges compared to other modes of life across the LTE; (3) heavily in the Norian which are now known to extend into the calcified organisms were selected against and suffered higher Rhaetian, whilst filling in the gaps of the

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us