Final Report Diamond-Drilling for Geologic Information in the Middle

Final Report Diamond-Drilling for Geologic Information in the Middle

FINAL REPORT Age Dating and Correlation of Precambrian W Rocks ......6 DIAMOND-DRILLING FOR GEOLOGIC Dead River Basin ...........................................................6 INFORMATION IN THE MIDDLE PRECAMBRIAN Clark Creek Basin ..........................................................6 BASINS IN THE WESTERN PORTION OF East Baraga Basin .........................................................6 NORTHERN MICHIGAN. Inexactness from Rb-Sr Determinations ........................6 Correlation within Precambrian X Baraga Group ..............6 By Basis for Correlation Among Holes................................6 James Trow Dead River Basin ...........................................................7 Geologist-in-Charge Clark Creek Basin ..........................................................7 for East Baraga Basin .........................................................7 Geological Survey Division Michigan Department of Natural Resources Northwest Flank of Amasa Oval, Iron County................8 A Major Unconformity in the Michigamme Formation?..8 1979 Significant Microscopic and Megascopic Observations PREPARED FOR Relevant to Precambrian X Sedimentation........................9 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Goodrich Quartzite .........................................................9 AND BENDIX FIELD ENGINEERING CORPORATION Lower (Slate or Argillite) Member of the Michigamme GRAND JUNCTION OFFICE Formation .....................................................................10 PROJECT NO. 20-77-2132 Bijiki Iron-Formation Member of the Michigamme Formation .....................................................................10 This report is preliminary and has not been edited for Upper (Slate or Argillite) Member of the Michigamme conformity with Geological Survey standards or Formation .....................................................................10 nomenclature. Metamorphism .................................................................12 This report is made from best available copy Precambrian Y Diabase and Gabbro...............................12 If this report is formally published it will no longer be available as an Open File Report. Structural Style and Timing..............................................12 Printed by the State of Michigan Possibilities for Ore in Precambrian W Strata .................13 Available from: Gold and Copper..........................................................13 Geological Survey Division Possibilities for Ore in Precambrian X Strata ..................13 Michigan Department of Natural Resources Base Metals..................................................................13 Box 30028 Phosphates ..................................................................13 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Uranium........................................................................14 All Open File materials are available at the price of A New Model for Saskatchewan’s Unconformity-Related xxxx per title. A list of available Open File Reports Ore Bodies is Relevant to Michigan.................................15 and Maps is available upon request. General Principles........................................................15 Open-File Report UDOE OFR G3BX-162(79) Michigan Oxidized Iron-Formations/Soft Iron Ores and 1979 Graphitic Slates of Precambrian X Age .......................16 Michigan's Precambrian 2 Jacobsville Sandstone over Precambrian X Graphitic Slates...................................16 CONTENTS Pleistocene Drift over Precambrian X Graphitic Slates16 Introduction........................................................................ 2 Bibliography .....................................................................16 Drilling Conceived and Completed ................................ 2 Locations of Drill Sites................................................... 2 Personnel Involved ........................................................ 4 Purpose of the Present Report...................................... 4 Chemical Analyses............................................................ 4 Program Design............................................................. 4 Analytical Procedure...................................................... 4 Data Presentation.......................................................... 5 Some Interesting Examples of Chemical Values .......... 5 Open-File Report UDOE OFR GJBX-162(79) – Page 1 of 17 FIGURES Locations of Drill Sites Figure 1. Location map of DL-1, DL-3, DL-4, DL-5, and DL-7. 3 Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the drill locations in Marquette and Iron Counties, Michigan. Proceeding generally from Figure 2. Location map of DL-6. ..............................................3 north to south: Figure 3. Stratigraphic sections of Marquette County holes ....7 The East Baraga Basin was probed by three holes: Figure 4. Comparison of Baraga Group strata at DL-5, Clark Initially vertical DL-1 in the NW¼, SW¼ section 5, Creek Basin, and approximately nine miles southeastward T.50N., R.28W., Marquette County, terminated at 2148 in the eastern Dead River Basin, as measured by Puffett feet, deviating from the vertical by 56¼°, N.14°E. Initially (1974, p. 35). Note significant thickening of each unit to vertical DL-3 in the NW¼, NW¼ section 14, T.50N., the southeast....................................................................9 R.29W., terminated at 1634 feet, deviating from the Figure 5. Schematic cross section of methane generation and vertical by 44°, N.18°E. DL-1 and DL-3 failed to resulting pitchblende ore above graphite conductor with a penetrate to the Precambrian W basement as a negative self-potential geophysical anomaly (at the time of consequence of overburden-concealed structural ore deposition) in the Athabasca Basin. .........................15 complexities, and as a consequence of deviation of the holes from the intended vertical as the bits attempted to penetrate the pervasive slaty cleavage perpendicularly. INTRODUCTION Therefore, an originally unplanned hole, DL-7 in the SW¼, NE¼ section 4, T.50N., R.28W., was drilled 1½ Drilling Conceived and Completed miles east of DL-1 to overlap lower strata encountered in DL-1. The hole encountered the Precambrian W In April, 1977, Robert C. Reed and David W. Snider of basement at 659 feet, before terminating at 679 feet the Geological Survey Division of the Michigan deviating 14½° from the vertical. An inclined hole, DL-2 Department of Natural Resources submitted a planned between DL-1 and DL-3, was never drilled preliminary unsolicited proposal to Merle E. Crew of because of budgetary considerations, and will not be ERDA concerning the diamond drilling of mainly further discussed. Precambrian X Michigamme Formation in four separate The Clark Creek Basin was tested by DL-5 in the NW¼, structural basins in Marquette and Iron Counties. The SE¼ section 16, T.49N., R27W., Marquette County, two major justifications for this proposal were the need where the hole was terminated at 1148 feet with a for probing new unexplored geologic environments deviation from the vertical of 3°, S. 10°W., after considered favorable for uranium deposition, and the penetrating the Precambrian W basement at 997 feet. need for basic geologic information, in the traditional function of governmental agencies. Previous work by The Dead River Basin was cored at DL-4 in the NW¼, the AEC (in the 1950’s), by Cannon and Klasner (1976), NE¼ section 2, T.48N., R.28W., Marquette County, by Kalliokoski and Johnson (1976), by Mancuso, where the hole was terminated at 3176 feet with a Lougheed, and Shaw (1975), and by Vickers (1956) had deviation from the vertical of 12 , S. 30°W., after indicated a potential for uranium and phosphate in these encountering the Precambrian W basement at 3119 feet. strata, even though they are not well exposed in the four Field Engineering Corporation subcontract details and basins. The proposal was accepted and implemented financial matters were handled by J. A. Papania, Director with funding by ERDA (now by the U. S. Department of or Procurement, and by D. C. Grove, Subcontract Energy), contracted by the Bendix Field Engineering Administrator. Frequent telephone and written Corporation, and subcontracted by the Michigan communication was maintained with T. J. Price, BFEC Geological Survey Division of the DNR, with the result Drilling Superintendent. Charles F. Hajek and Jack that between September 26, 1977, and May 11, 1978, McCaslin of BFEC observed the drilling for extended six initially vertical holes probed a total of 9896 feet periods. BFEC geophysical logging was originally (1109 feet or 11.2% in overburden, 155 feet or 1.6% in planned by Mike Callihan, and was implemented by Kirk Precambrian Y mafic dikes, 8386 feet or 84.7% in Hayer and Wayne D. Gisler. Precambrian X Goodrich Quartzite and Michigamme Formation, and 246 feet or 2.5% in Precambrian W For the Geological Survey Division of the Michigan basement lithologies). In addition to normal examination Department of Natural Resources the manager of the of core, logging, and storing of core, the holes were project was Robert C. Reed, Chief, Mining and extensively logged geophysically, acidized core was Environmental Geology Section. Day-to-day tested for phosphate content by ammonium molybdate, administration and complete planning for chemical splits from five out of every thirty feet of core were analyses were carried out by the assistant manager, subjected to chemical scrutiny, thin sections of all David W. Snider, Research Staff Unit Coordinator,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us