Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Pollution Prevention Fact Sheet/September 1996 Case Study: Concrete Maker Reduces Water Use Company Fabcon, Incorporated: Savage, MN Product Precast, prestressed fabricated concrete panels Waste Used 3,000,000 gallons of water monthly; discharged 2,908,000 gallons monthly; landfilled 20,000 tons of concrete waste annually Change Replaced water-cooled pumps with air-cooled hydraulic pumps; Reduce Costs through recycle remaining water used; a Pollution Prevention recycle waste concrete Cost $11,765 for pumps; $225,000 for Process closed-loop water recycling system Savings/ $259,484 during the first year, and benefit $191,090 annually thereafter. Kept Many techniques which make the most efficient water use at 1991 levels, avoiding use of resources in your production process or a service charge of $68,394 business activity can be classified as pollution prevention. For businesses, most pollution MnTAP Source: University of Minnesota, Fall 1995 prevention techniques result in reduced costs and potentially, higher profits. From the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) Pollution Prevention standpoint, pollution prevention offers Requirements of the 1995 increased environmental protection and better long-term compliance rates. Minnesota Environmental Improvement Act (Act) Applying preventive techniques to your business activities reduces energy, water or Overview of the Act other resource use. In addition, air, water and waste pollutants are minimized, reducing the On August 1, 1995 a four year environmental pilot capital or ongoing costs of reclamation, program began at the MPCA. This voluntary treatment, control and compliance with program encourages businesses and governments environmental regulations. to conduct environmental audits of facilities and correct problems they may discover. Pollution prevention requires informed choices. Either through major actions such as updating For those opting in, the pilot project requires equipment or changing production inputs, or businesses and government to report any through the numerous small choices employees violations they discover to the MPCA along make every day, large amounts of waste can be with a plan for correcting the violations. The prevented. intent of the program is to focus on the goal of achieving measurable environmental results, not 1 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Pollution Prevention Fact Sheet/September 1996 on fines or other penalties. Except in the case ◊ a large stationary air emission source; an of very serious or repeat violations, penalties air emission source that emits 50 or more will not be assessed. tons per year of a specific air pollutant, or; ◊ an air emission source that emits 75 tons Pollution Prevention Requirements for or more per year of all air pollutants Major Facilities regulated by the MPCA. The Act requires different pollution prevention If you are unsure what category you are, contact activities depending on a facility’s size. the MPCA at the phone number at the end of this fact sheet. Minnesota law defines pollution prevention as the elimination or reduction of the use, generation, or release of a pollutant at the Case Study: Reducing Perc Use in Dry Cleaning source. This contrasts with simply trying to Company Cottage Cleaners: Forest Lake, MN control the pollutant at the end of a discharge pipe or stack. Process Dry cleaning Chemical Perchloroethylene (PCE or perc) Going this far back into a production or activity to eliminate waste ensures that the process Process Replaced an old transfer dry becomes more efficient. Pollution prevention change cleaning machine with a new and therefore reduces the cost of doing business more efficient dry-to-dry machine. while satisfying the environmental Cost $49,000 purchase cost for a new improvement mandate in the statutory dry-to-dry machine definition. Savings/ Perc use reduced from 455 gallons The Act requires a “major” facility to develop a benefit in 1990 to 38 gallons in 1992, pollution prevention plan and submit progress saving $2,246 (1992 dollars) reports to the MPCA. The pollution prevention annually; hazardous waste reduced plan is based largely on the process described from 375 gallons in 1990 to 240 later. The progress report encourages the gallons in 1992, saving $593 (1992 facility to review their plan’s progress every dollars) annually; complied with year, and lets the MPCA know how the facility perc regulatory requirements is doing, and where assistance can be provided. MnTAP Source: University of Minnesota, Winter 1994 A major facility is defined as: Contents of Pollution Prevention Plans and ◊ the largest type of industrial or municipal Progress Reports for Major Facilities wastewater discharge facility; ◊ a feedlot with 1,000 or more animal units; The Act requires major facilities to prepare ◊ a large quantity hazardous waste formal pollution prevention plans to participate generator; in the pilot program. The plans do not need to ◊ a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or be submitted to the MPCA. The plans should at disposal facility; a minimum include the following for all facility operations: 2 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Pollution Prevention Fact Sheet/September 1996 (1) a policy statement stating upper (1) a summary of each pollution prevention management support for eliminating or objective established in the plan, and the reducing the generation or release of schedule for meeting each objective; pollutants; (2) a summary of progress made (if any) (2) a description of the types, sources, and during the past year toward meeting quantities of pollutants currently being each objective established in the plan generated or released, and of the including the quantity of each pollutant processes or activities involved; eliminated or reduced; (3) a description and an evaluation of the (3) a statement of the methods through effectiveness of current and past which elimination or reduction has been practices used to eliminate or reduce the achieved; generation or release of pollutants; (4) if necessary, an explanation of the (4) an assessment of technically and reasons objectives were not achieved economically feasible pollution during the previous year, identifying any prevention options available, including technological, economic, or other options such as changing raw materials, obstacles the facility faced; and operating techniques, equipment and (5) a legally-binding certification, signed technology, personnel training, and and dated by the facility manager and an other practices. The assessment may officer of the company attesting that a include a cost benefit analysis of the plan meeting the requirements of the law available options; has been prepared, and also attesting to (5) a statement of the pollution prevention the accuracy of the information in the objectives developed, based on the progress report. assessment in clause (4), and a schedule for achieving those objectives; Pollution Prevention Requirements for Non- (6) an explanation of the rationale for each Major Facilities pollution prevention objective established; Minor facilities do not need to develop a (7) a list of options that were considered not pollution prevention plan or submit a progress to be economically and technically report, but they are required to “examine” feasible; and pollution prevention opportunities. Minor (8) a legally-binding certification attesting facilities are encouraged to undertake the to the accuracy of the information in the program process outlined later in this fact sheet. plan, signed and dated by the facility manager and an officer of the company. Specifically, if you have examined any of the following options, you are eligible to participate Progress Reports in the program. To participate in the program, major facilities (1) A change in your processes to reduce the must also prepare and submit progress reports amount of raw materials needed. to the Emergency Response Commission every (2) A change in inventory control year. The progress reports may be drafted so procedures to only purchase what is they do not disclose proprietary information. needed and usable within a short period The progress reports should include the of time. following information at a minimum: 3 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Pollution Prevention Fact Sheet/September 1996 (3) A substitution of any raw material for a less hazardous or toxic one. A pollution prevention “program” will help (4) Institution of any housekeeping or fulfill the requirements of the Act. It can be management practices to reduce spills or informal or formal, detailed or general, rigorous wasting of raw materials. or relaxed, depending on the size of the (5) Improving or replacing machinery to company and its style. In general, a pollution make it more efficient. prevention program is an ongoing, (6) The formation of a source reduction comprehensive examination of the operations of team made up of representatives from a business or facility. The program goal is to various departments and organizational reduce direct and hidden operating costs by levels. minimizing all kinds of wastes associated with (7) Contacting a state or local group, such production or other business activity. as the Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance or the An effective pollution prevention program can Minnesota Technical Assistance yield cost savings that will more than offset Program (MnTAP) to help you evaluate program development and implementation costs. your pollution prevention opportunities.