Appendix D: Summary of Representations (as of 4th March 2013) 2012 Summary of Representations (as of 4th March 2013) with minor updates Rep ID First Name Second Name Organisations Type (Policy, Para, Name (Policy, Para, Title (Policy, Para, Summary of Representation no. Map, SA, Appx) Map, SA, Appx) Map, SA, Appx) 113 Julia Edwards Corylus Ltd Paragraph Forward Forward Supports recognition of need for limiting housing growth while enabling growth in locations where integration with existing communities is possible. 57 Paul Burrell Pegasus Group / Dorchester Paragraph Executive Summary Summary Supports the extended Plan period to 2031. Group 71 Brett Chambers Wendlebury Parish Council Paragraph Executive Summary Vision The LP contradicts the aim to strictly control development in open countryside by proposing a Bicester Relief Road that cuts across open countryside. 136 Sarah Hamilton-Foyn Pegasus Group / Persimmon Paragraph Executive Summary Vision The forward and summary discussing housing delivery should be Homes - 1 of 3 revised in order to consider the John Harmon Report. 299 Bruce Tremayne CPRE Bicester District Paragraph Executive Summary Vision Support overall vision, strategy and objectives. Support strongly controlling development in the open countryside. Concern at the level of growth allocated at Bicester, reliance of the South East RSS housing targets and traditional 'predict and provide' approach. 67 Gemma Care Barton Willmore / Bovis Homes Paragraph Executive Summary Vision Supported. 107 Richard Cutler Bloombridge LLP / Hill Street Paragraph Executive Summary Vision Amendment proposed to Vision. Holdings / Oxford Technology Park 112 Keith Dixon Launton Parish Council Paragraph Executive Summary Vision Supports the vision and strategy 112 Keith Dixon Launton Parish Council Paragraph Executive Summary Vision The vision and strategy should mention preserving the District 113 Julia Edwards Corylus Ltd Paragraph Executive Summary Vision Supports directing growth to the urban centres 113 Julia Edwards Corylus Ltd Paragraph Executive Summary Vision Supports control of growth in the open countryside 113 Julia Edwards Corylus Ltd Paragraph Executive Summary Vision Supports the recognition of the importance of maintaining local identity 132 Theresa Goss Adderbury Parish Council Paragraph Executive Summary Vision 'Aiming to' is incompatible with 'strictly control' and it should be removed. 134 Theresa Goss Bloxham Parish Council Paragraph Executive Summary Vision 'Aiming to' is incompatible with 'strictly control' and it should be removed. Page 1 of 233 Appendix D: Summary of Representations (as of 4th March 2013) Rep ID First Name Second Name Organisations Type (Policy, Para, Name (Policy, Para, Title (Policy, Para, Summary of Representation no. Map, SA, Appx) Map, SA, Appx) Map, SA, Appx) 134 Theresa Goss Bloxham Parish Council Paragraph Executive Summary Vision It would have been helpful if the Neighbourhoods DPD were submitted with the Draft Local Plan. There is confusion in using Neighbourhood Development Plan reference in the NPPF it could be interpreted as plans drawn by Neighbourhoods not LPA's. There is a need for clarification. 134 Theresa Goss Bloxham Parish Council Paragraph Executive Summary Vision The figure to take into account for table 5 should be 13th December 2004, the date CDC created the Non statutory Local Plan 2011. 183 Rob Kinchin-Smith Banbury Civic Society Paragraph Executive Summary Vision Vision should make reference to historic environment, old buildings and Canal. 264 Daniel Round OCC - Archaeology Paragraph Executive Summary Vision Should refer to Historic Environment. List as challenge and objectives. 264 Daniel Round OCC - Highways and Transport Paragraph Executive Summary Vision OCC Countryside Access Team support vision. Rural economy, high quality of life, and social and physical infrastructure - green infrastructure. Public rights of way network. Support focus of growth at Banbury & Bicester. LTP2 objectives used instead of LTP3 objectives. 178 Andrew Raven Savills / Barwood Strategic Land Paragraph Executive Summary Developing a Object to balance of employment growth between Bicester & LLP Sustainable Local Banbury. Further employment opportunities required at Banbury. Economy 107 Richard Cutler Bloombridge LLP / Hill Street Table Table 1 Proposed Table 1 should make reference to Oxford Technology Park. Holdings / Oxford Technology Strategic Park Employment Allocations 190 Nik Lyzba JPPC / Oxford University Press Table Table 1 Proposed The employment allocation at Kidlington should be a Strategic Strategic Employment Allocation and noted in Table 1. Employment Allocation 264 Daniel Round OCC - Highways and Transport Table Table 1 Proposed Job provision for North West Bicester should be approx 1,794 to Strategic match new housing target. Employment Allocations Page 2 of 233 Appendix D: Summary of Representations (as of 4th March 2013) Rep ID First Name Second Name Organisations Type (Policy, Para, Name (Policy, Para, Title (Policy, Para, Summary of Representation no. Map, SA, Appx) Map, SA, Appx) Map, SA, Appx) 178 Andrew Raven Savills / Barwood Strategic Land Paragraph Executive Summary Building Object to balance of growth between Bicester & Banbury. Banbury is LLP Sustainable identified as a Primary Regional Centre in the South East RSS. 41% of Communities jobs are at Banbury opposed to 20% at Bicester. Bicester has expanded seven times compared to Banbury which has doubled since 1951. Banbury is more self contained. 57 Paul Burrell Pegasus Group / Dorchester Table Table 3 Proposed Overall The Policy refers to Upper Heyford as the rest of the District which is Group Development inaccurate as it should be recognised as a significant brownfield site Strategy in the separately within the settlement hierarchy District 136 Sarah Hamilton-Foyn Pegasus Group / Persimmon Table Table 3 Proposed Overall Support. Homes - 1 of 3 Development Strategy in the District 178 Andrew Raven Savills / Barwood Strategic Land Table Table 4 Proposed Insufficient evidence to justify 1,050 allocation at Banbury Canalside LLP Strategic Housing and its delivery in Plan period. Allocations in Bicester and Banbury 2011- 2031 189David Locke David Lock Associates / Gallagher Table Table 4 Proposed Concern at the delivery of Canalside site, land assembly, design and Estates Strategic Housing capacity, viability. Cooperation amongst large number of land Sites in Bicester owners. High density target does not reflect market conditions for and Banbury 2011 flats. Poor market conditions. Expensive relocation costs. Land at - 2031 Wykham Farm should be included within the table with a development capacity of approximately 100 dwg. Site will improve housing land supply. Site is in single ownership. Site is capable of early delivery. Design and Access Statement attached. 136 Sarah Hamilton-Foyn Pegasus Group / Persimmon Table Table 4 Proposed Support in relation to Hanwell Fields. Homes - 1 of 3 Strategic Housing Allocations in Bicester and Banbury 2011- 2031 Page 3 of 233 Appendix D: Summary of Representations (as of 4th March 2013) Rep ID First Name Second Name Organisations Type (Policy, Para, Name (Policy, Para, Title (Policy, Para, Summary of Representation no. Map, SA, Appx) Map, SA, Appx) Map, SA, Appx) 161 Andrew Hornsby-Smith Table Table 5 Distribution of Remove Kidlington from group 3 and create its own group. Housing in the Rural Areas 168Patricia Jesson Wroxton & Balscote Parish Table Table 5 Distribution of When will village housing allocation be made known?. Delays in this Council Housing in Rural will delay proposals and implementation of the Local Plan. Areas 136 Sarah Hamilton-Foyn Pegasus Group / Persimmon Table Table 6 Affordable Object to 30% affordable housing - inflexible - should be subject to Homes - 1 of 3 Housing Policy as viability set out in Policy BSC3 258 Trish Redpath Kidlington Parish Council Table Table 6 Affordable In table 6 reduce Kidlington Affordable Housing Threshold to 3 Housing Policy as homes. set out in Policy BSC3 136 Sarah Hamilton-Foyn Pegasus Group / Persimmon Table Table 7 Supporting Support objectives. Should have due regard to viability. Homes - 1 of 3 Strategic Policies 178 Andrew Raven Savills / Barwood Strategic Land Paragraph 1.3 How the Local Incomplete evidence base - Banbury Masterplan, movement LLP Plan has been assessment & landscape analysis. Prepared 198 Rebecca McAllister Hives Planning / Oxford Diocesan Paragraph 1.3 Introduction to The Local Plan is not supported by required Landscape Sensitivity Board of Finance / trustees of the the Local Plan and Capacity study at Banbury or Movement Assessment for the Adderbury and Milton Feoffee town and Viability Assessment of the Canalside development. Charity Proposals for a major employment allocation on the eastside of the M40 at Banbury are not available for the consultation. Plan post dates the evidence base. 178 Andrew Raven Savills / Barwood Strategic Land Paragraph 1.6 Introduction to Critical challenges should be expanded - 2nd bullet point should LLP the Local Plan ensure development is delivered in the most appropriate locations, 3rd bullet point should be deleted, new bullet point should reflect low carbon economy, new bullet point should ensure sufficient flexibility to allow for changes. 71 Brett Chambers Wendlebury Parish Council Paragraph 1.13 Introduction to The proposed relief road will destroy the quality rural and natural the Local Plan environment that Wendlebury currently enjoys. There appears