Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Genotyping Is Equivalent to Metaphase Cytogenetics for Diagnosis of Turner Syndrome

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Genotyping Is Equivalent to Metaphase Cytogenetics for Diagnosis of Turner Syndrome

© American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Single-nucleotide polymorphism array genotyping is equivalent to metaphase cytogenetics for diagnosis of Turner syndrome Siddharth Prakash, MD, PhD1, Dongchuan Guo, PhD1, Cheryl L. Maslen, PhD2, Michael Silberbach, MD3, Dianna Milewicz, MD, PhD1, Carolyn A. Bondy, MD4 and the GenTAC Investigators Purpose: Turner syndrome is a developmental disorder caused The remaining cases were mosaic for monosomy X and normal male by partial or complete monosomy for the X chromosome in 1 in or female cell lines. Array-based models of X chromosome structure 2,500 females. We hypothesized that single-nucleotide polymor- were compatible with karyotypes in 104 of 116 comparable cases phism (SNP) array genotyping could provide superior resolution in (90%). We found that the SNP array data did not detect X-autosome comparison to metaphase karyotype analysis to facilitate genotype–­ translocations (three cases) but did identify two derivative Y chro- phenotype correlations. mosomes and 13 large copy-number variants that were not detected by karyotyping. Methods: We genotyped 187 Turner syndrome patients with 733,000 SNP marker arrays. All cases met diagnostic criteria for Conclusion: Our study is the first systematic comparison between Turner syndrome based on karyotypes (60%) or characteristic physi- the two methods and supports the utility of SNP array genotyping to cal features. The SNP array results confirmed the diagnosis of Turner address clinical and research questions in Turner syndrome. syndrome in 100% of cases. Genet Med advance online publication 6 June 2013 Results: We identified a single X chromosome (45,X) in 113 cases. Key Words: array; cytogenetics; diagnosis; karyotype; sex In 58 additional cases (31%), other mosaic cell lines were present, ­chromosomes; Turner syndrome including isochromosomes (16%), rings (5%), and Xp deletions (8%). INTRODUCTION culture. In some cases, lymphocytes have even been shown to Turner Syndrome (TS) is a developmental disorder caused by accumulate chromosomal aberrations while in culture that are partial or complete loss of one X chromosome that occurs in ~1 not detectable in whole blood.4,5 The likelihood that these artifacts in 2,500 live female births. Women with TS present with mul- will occur depends on the manner in which the samples are pre- tiple developmental defects, including skeletal abnormalities, pared. Cytogenetic analysis is a slow, labor-intensive, multistep cardiac defects, and premature ovarian failure.1 Approximately process that is difficult to standardize and subject to considerable half of TS patients have a single X chromosome in all somatic variability. As the cost declines and speed of analysis increases, cells that are analyzed clinically, mainly lymphocytes. The oth- whole-genome microarray methods have become the diagnostic ers are mosaics of 45,X and 46,XX cells or structural derivatives standard for many chromosomal disorders but not for TS. including isochromosomes, rings, and deletions. The severity of We hypothesized that single-nucleotide polymorphism TS features is generally correlated with the percentage of cells (SNP) array genotyping could provide superior resolution in that harbor a single copy of Xp, but only one gene has been comparison to karyotyping to facilitate rapid diagnosis and implicated in a specific phenotype. Decreased expression of the genotype–phenotype correlations in TS. Here, we present the SHOX gene in the pseudoautosomal region of Xp is associated first systematic comparison between the two methods and pro- with short stature and skeletal deformities.2,3 vide evidence for the utility of SNP array genotyping to address Karyotype analysis of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lym- clinical and research issues in TS. phocyte cultures has been the gold standard for the diagnosis of TS. In a metaphase spread, clinical laboratories typically evaluate MATERIALS AND METHODS 20–50 Giemsa-banded cells and follow up abnormal results using Subject selection fluorescence in situ hybridization. However, this may not be suf- All women who were diagnosed with Turner syndrome (TS) ficient to detect low-level (<10%) mosaicism. Differential growth based on suggestive phenotypic features were included in the of aneuploid cells may lead to their abnormal representation in study. For patients with peripheral blood-cell karyotypes, an The last two authors contributed equally to this work. 1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA; 2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Heart Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; 3Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; 4National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Correspondence: Siddharth Prakash ([email protected]) Submitted 26 November 2012; accepted 18 April 2013; advance online publication 6 June 2013. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.77 Genetics in medicine | Volume 16 | Number 1 | January 2014 53 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE PRAKASH et al | Single-nucleotide polymorphism array diagnosis of Turner syndrome X chromosomal abnormality was required to be present for losses or copy gains according to the method of Conlin et al.9 inclusion. After reviewing the clinical data, five patients were To deduce the most likely genotypes and estimate the percent- excluded from further study because they did not meet diagnos- ages of mosaic cell lines, we compared mean B-allele frequency tic criteria for TS. These subjects had been labeled as “possible and logR ratio values of segmental aneuploidies with expected TS” and had not previously been genotyped. All other patients, values for monosomies and trisomies. Figure 1 illustrates these including those with ring X chromosomes, had typical TS fea- computations for a TS case with a nonmosaic, isodicentric tures and X chromosome abnormalities consistent with TS. X chromosome. Array data and karyotypes were judged to be compatible if cell lines that were observed in more than one Samples G-banded cell were also present in the genotypes. We studied 192 samples from females of European ancestry. We obtained 111 samples from the National Registry of Genetically Statistical methods Triggered Aortic Aneurysms and Other Cardiovascular Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were applied to test quan- Conditions (GenTAC, Rockville, MD). GenTAC is a consortium titative parameters among the different study groups. All tests of eight institutions that is coordinated by the National Heart, applied were two-tailed, and a P value of ≤5% was considered Lung and Blood Institute, which maintains a central repository statistically significant. of tissue, DNA, and limited phenotypic data on patients with congenital heart disease, including TS. We also obtained 75 Human subjects samples from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Studies were carried out with the approval of the Committee Development. An additional six samples were from the Baylor for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Texas College of Medicine (two) and the University of Texas Health Health Science Center at Houston, the GenTAC Scientific Science Center at Houston (four). Reports of karyotypes were Advisory Committee (Rockville, MD), and the National Institute available for 116 cases (60%). All karyotypes were postnatal. Of of Child Health and Human Development Institutional Review 44 reports with mosaic cell lines, 27 reported 50-cell karyotypes Board. All samples were from deidentified individuals who had and 9 reported karyotypes of 30 or fewer cells. The number of been referred for clinical genetic testing. Karyotype informa- karyotyped cells was not reported in the other cases. Samples tion was provided by the treating physicians. After collection, were collected simultaneously from the National Institutes of all samples were deidentified to preserve patient confidentiality. Health patients for karyotyping and genotyping. The relative timing of sample collections from GenTAC patients was not RESULTS known to the investigators. DNA samples from 187 TS patients (European American, with an average age of 32 years) were genotyped using 733,000 SNP Genotyping and copy-number analysis marker arrays. One-hundred and sixteen cases had karyotypes, All DNA was obtained by extraction from whole blood. Sample and 71 cases were thought to have TS based on characteristic processing, DNA purification, and hybridization were per- physical features including short stature, premature ovarian formed as previously described.6 Data for each Omni-Express failure, and congenital cardiovascular defects such as bicuspid BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA) were normalized in aortic valve or coarctation (Table 1). Of note, genotyping con- GenomeStudio using information contained within the array. firmed the presence of X-chromosome aneuploidy consistent After allele detection and genotype calling, B-allele frequen- with the diagnosis of TS in all patients with a strong index of cies and logR ratios were exported as text files for analysis clinical suspicion for whom karyotypes were not available. with PennCNV software (http://www.openbioinformatics. We identified a single X chromosome (45,X) in 113 cases org/penncnv).7 A second copy-number variant (CNV) detec- (60%) and mosaic 45,X and 46,XX or 46,XY cell lines in 16 tion algorithm, CNVPartition,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us