Particle detection and tracking with DNA Ciaran A. J. O’Hare,1, 2, ∗ Vassili G. Matsos,2 Joseph Newton,2 Karl Smith,2 Joel Hochstetter,2 Ravi Jaiswar,2 Wunna Kyaw,3 Aimee McNamara,4 Zdenka Kuncic,2 Sushma Nagaraja Grellscheid,5 and Celine´ Bœhm1, 2 1ARC Centre of Excellence for Dark Matter Particle Physics, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia 2School of Physics, Physics Road, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Camperdown, Sydney, Australia 3Garvan Institute of Medical Research, NSW 2010, Darlinghurst, Australia 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 5Computational Biology Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Thormohlensgt 55, Bergen N-5008, Norway We present the first proof-of-concept simulations of detectors using biomaterials to detect particle interac- tions. The essential idea behind a “DNA detector” involves the attachment of a forest of precisely-sequenced single or double-stranded nucleic acids from a thin holding layer made of a high-density material. Incoming par- ticles break a series of strands along a roughly co-linear chain of interaction sites and the severed segments then fall to a collection area. Since the sequences of base pairs in nucleic acid molecules can be precisely amplified and measured using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the original spatial position of each broken strand inside the detector can be reconstructed with nm precision. Motivated by the potential use as a low-energy directional particle tracker, we perform the first Monte Carlo simulations of particle interactions inside a DNA detector. We compare the track topology as a function of incoming direction, energy, and particle type for a range of ionising particles. While particle identification and energy reconstruction might be challenging without a sig- ◦ nificant scale-up, the excellent potential angular and spatial resolution (. 25 axial resolution for a keV-scale particles and nm-scale track segments) are clear advantages of this concept. We conclude that a DNA detector could be a cost-effective, portable, and powerful new particle detection technology. We outline the outstanding experimental challenges, and suggest directions for future laboratory tests. I. INTRODUCTION features that we will discuss shortly. The general idea consists of strands of DNA attached to a thin gold sheet. Dark matter In the search for signatures of new physics, fresh exper- particles from our galaxy would enter the detector, scatter off imental ideas are always desired. Ultrahigh energy cosmic a gold nucleus, and send it on a recoil through the DNA forest, rays [1], weakly-interacting particles orbiting the galaxy [2– breaking a sequence of strands in a characteristic pattern. The 4], light species emitted by the Sun [5–10], or even the search broken segments would be encouraged to fall down to a col- for relics of the Big Bang [11], are just a few of the fron- lecting area with the use of magnetic beads attached to their tiers in particle physics which would greatly benefit from ends. After that, they would be transported to devices that per- new technologies. Recently there has been substantial ac- form polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify the strand tivity in the community towards the repurposing of interdis- segments. Then, by studying the precise sequences of bases ciplinary science. Ideas leveraging cutting edge research in in the collected strand segments, one could infer the original condensed matter physics [12–18], nuclear magnetic reso- spatial positions in the detector at which each strand was sev- nance [19, 20], nanomaterials [21–23] and even microscopy ered, thereby reconstructing complete particle tracks. of ancient rocks [24–33] have all been proposed in the context Since the original DNA detector proposal, state-of-the-art of new particle detection techniques. dark matter detectors [2–4] have exceeded the ton-scale in This study follows a similar spirit, but instead seeks to size—providing a level of sensitivity that is difficult for en- use technologies from the biosciences. From proton ther- tirely new technologies to compete with. Therefore the pri- apy to medical imaging, particle physics techniques have re- mary benefit of such a DNA detector in the context of dark peatedly proven their use in biological applications since the matter right now would be the ability to perform directional 1950s [34]. Here we propose to return the favour, by asking measurements of low-energy recoils. Indeed, dark matter how we might leverage advances in biotechnology to answer signals are expected to be strongly directional [39], a phe- fundamental questions in particle physics. nomenon generated by the orbit of the solar system through The concept of a DNA-based particle detector was origi- the dark matter halo that envelopes our galaxy [40]. A search arXiv:2105.11949v1 [physics.ins-det] 25 May 2021 nally proposed in articles by Drukier et al. [35, 36] to help for recoil tracks aligning with the direction of our galactic ro- elucidate the answer to one of those questions: The nature of tation would permit a convincing test of the veracity of any po- dark matter—a mysterious substance that is supposed to fill tential dark matter signal [39, 41–46], but would also allow it the galaxy in which we live [37]. The basic detector concept to be cleanly distinguished from sources of background noise is shown in Fig.1. We follow the essential features of the such as cosmic rays, radioactive decays, and neutrinos [47– original design of Ref. [38], but incorporate some additional 50]. The reconstruction of particle tracks is challenging at the low energies relevant for a dark matter search. Hence, di- rectional information is usually not sought after in the most ∗ [email protected] competitive experiments, instead requiring more specialised 2 Incoming<latexit sha1_base64="57MisL+IVsCjlAiw/8qxdnSpCnQ=">AAACA3icbVDLSgMxFM34rPU16k43wSK4kDJTBV0W3eiugn1AZyiZNNOG5jEkGaEMBTf+ihsXirj1J9z5N6btCNp64MLhnHuTe0+UMKqN5305C4tLyyurhbXi+sbm1ra7s9vQMlWY1LFkUrUipAmjgtQNNYy0EkUQjxhpRoOrsd+8J0pTKe7MMCEhRz1BY4qRsVLH3c8CxeGNwJJT0YPBCUyQMhQzMuq4Ja/sTQDniZ+TEshR67ifQVfilBNhMENat30vMWH2814xSDVJEB6gHmlbKhAnOswmN4zgkVW6MJbKljBwov6eyBDXesgj28mR6etZbyz+57VTE1+EGRVJaojA04/ilEEj4TgQ2KWKYMOGliCsqN0V4j5SCBsbW9GG4M+ePE8albJ/Wq7cnpWql3kcBXAADsEx8ME5qIJrUAN1gMEDeAIv4NV5dJ6dN+d92rrg5DN74A+cj29aK5dW</latexit> particle L = L and in Sec.VI we outline several questions that will require <latexit sha1_base64="n7Fu0DjGE5zlmROtb8DRMuqLp1I=">AAAB8HicbVBNS8NAEJ3Ur1q/qh69LBbBU0mqoBeh6MVDDxXsh7QhbLabdulmE3Y3Ygj9FV48KOLVn+PNf+O2zUFbHww83pthZp4fc6a0bX9bhZXVtfWN4mZpa3tnd6+8f9BWUSIJbZGIR7LrY0U5E7Slmea0G0uKQ5/Tjj++mfqdRyoVi8S9TmPqhngoWMAI1kZ6aHhP6Ao1vNQrV+yqPQNaJk5OKpCj6ZW/+oOIJCEVmnCsVM+xY+1mWGpGOJ2U+omiMSZjPKQ9QwUOqXKz2cETdGKUAQoiaUpoNFN/T2Q4VCoNfdMZYj1Si95U/M/rJTq4dDMm4kRTQeaLgoQjHaHp92jAJCWap4ZgIpm5FZERlphok1HJhOAsvrxM2rWqc1at3Z1X6td5HEU4gmM4BQcuoA630IQWEAjhGV7hzZLWi/VufcxbC1Y+cwh/YH3+AJUOj5w=</latexit> x y Incoming<latexit sha1_base64="57MisL+IVsCjlAiw/8qxdnSpCnQ=">AAACA3icbVDLSgMxFM34rPU16k43wSK4kDJTBV0W3eiugn1AZyiZNNOG5jEkGaEMBTf+ihsXirj1J9z5N6btCNp64MLhnHuTe0+UMKqN5305C4tLyyurhbXi+sbm1ra7s9vQMlWY1LFkUrUipAmjgtQNNYy0EkUQjxhpRoOrsd+8J0pTKe7MMCEhRz1BY4qRsVLH3c8CxeGNwJJT0YPBCUyQMhQzMuq4Ja/sTQDniZ+TEshR67ifQVfilBNhMENat30vMWH2814xSDVJEB6gHmlbKhAnOswmN4zgkVW6MJbKljBwov6eyBDXesgj28mR6etZbyz+57VTE1+EGRVJaojA04/ilEEj4TgQ2KWKYMOGliCsqN0V4j5SCBsbW9GG4M+ePE8albJ/Wq7cnpWql3kcBXAADsEx8ME5qIJrUAN1gMEDeAIv4NV5dJ6dN+d92rrg5DN74A+cj29aK5dW</latexit> particle further experimental investigation. We conclude in Sec. VII. t<latexit sha1_base64="btWuKJH9/rrCxCKL5tGKBdwWU5A=">AAAB6HicbVBNS8NAEJ3Ur1q/qh69LBbBU0mqoMeiF48t2FpoQ9lsN+3azSbsToQS+gu8eFDEqz/Jm//GbZuDtj4YeLw3w8y8IJHCoOt+O4W19Y3NreJ2aWd3b/+gfHjUNnGqGW+xWMa6E1DDpVC8hQIl7ySa0yiQ/CEY3878hyeujYjVPU4S7kd0qEQoGEUrNbFfrrhVdw6ySrycVCBHo1/+6g1ilkZcIZPUmK7nJuhnVKNgkk9LvdTwhLIxHfKupYpG3PjZ/NApObPKgISxtqWQzNXfExmNjJlEge2MKI7MsjcT//O6KYbXfiZUkiJXbLEoTCXBmMy+JgOhOUM5sYQyLeythI2opgxtNiUbgrf88ipp16reRbXWvKzUb/I4inACp3AOHlxBHe6gAS1gwOEZXuHNeXRenHfnY9FacPKZY/gD5/MH4XeM/A==</latexit> ✓<latexit sha1_base64="LKVzei7kiuT9mJx/DnzNWdkyxDY=">AAAB+HicbVBNS8NAEN34WetHqx69LBbBU0mqoMeiF48V7Ac0IWy2m3bp7ibsToQa+ku8eFDEqz/Fm//GbZuDtj4YeLw3w8y8KBXcgOt+O2vrG5tb26Wd8u7e/kGlenjUMUmmKWvTRCS6FxHDBFesDRwE66WaERkJ1o3GtzO/+8i04Yl6gEnKAkmGisecErBSWK34MGJAwtzXEnM1Das1t+7OgVeJV5AaKtAKq1/+IKGZZAqoIMb0PTeFICcaOBVsWvYzw1JCx2TI+pYqIpkJ8vnhU3xmlQGOE21LAZ6rvydyIo2ZyMh2SgIjs+zNxP+8fgbxdZBzlWbAFF0sijOBIcGzFPCAa0ZBTCwhVHN7K6YjogkFm1XZhuAtv7xKOo26d1Fv3F/WmjdFHCV0gk7ROfLQFWqiO9RCbURRhp7RK3pznpwX5935WLSuOcXMMfoD5/MH6bqTQA==</latexit> in II. RATIONALE In most of the widely-used low-energy particle detectors, 2000 bases even a hypothetical reconstruction of three-dimensional recoil track vectors is difficult to imagine. In dedicated directional detectors, like gas-based detectors, the solution is to drift the L<latexit sha1_base64="ZU5zaITSQQ/GhIV9EEE1xq+dt+g=">AAACEHicbVC7TsMwFHXKq4RXgZHFokIwoCopCLogFbEwMBSJPqQmqhzXba3aTmQ7SCXqJ7DwKywMIMTKyMbf4KQdoOVIVzo651773hNEjCrtON9WbmFxaXklv2qvrW9sbhW2dxoqjCUmdRyyULYCpAijgtQ11Yy0IkkQDxhpBsOr1G/eE6loKO70KCI+R31BexQjbaRO4TDxJIdlx3G84/QdNfY8+6bzAC/gWcVomS34uFMoOiUnA5wn7pQUwRS1TuHL64Y45kRozJBSbdeJtJ8gqSlmZGx7sSIRwkPUJ21DBeJE+Ul20BgeGKULe6E0JTTM1N8TCeJKjXhgOjnSAzXrpeJ/XjvWvYqfUBHFmgg8+agXM6hDmKYDu1QSrNnIEIQlNbtCPEASYW0ytE0I7uzJ86RRLrknpfLtabF6OY0jD/bAPjgCLjgHVXANaqAOMHgEz+AVvFlP1ov1bn1MWnPWdGYX/IH1+QPawJqX</latexit> z = 680 nm entire mm-scale ionisation cloud generated by recoiling nuclei