Shorter Contributions to General Geology

Shorter Contributions to General Geology

Please do not destroy or throw away this publication. If you have no further use for it write to the Geological Survey at Washington and ask for a frank to return it DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hubert Work, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SUR.VEY Geor~re Otis Smith, Director PROFESSIONAL PAPER 147 SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY 1926 W. C. MENDENHALL, CHIEF GEOLOGIST WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1927 J ,,-.-__________ ._.....:.____ __ ~ DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR· Hubert Work, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith, Direetor Professional Paper 147 SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY 1926 W. C. MENDENHALL, CHIEF GEOLOGIST • WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1927 CONTENTS [The letters in pareptheses preceding the titles are those used to designate the papers for advance publication] Page (A) A comparison of the genera Metaplacenticeras Spath and Placenticeras Meek, by J. B. Reeside, jr. (published Sept. 14, 1926)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 (B) The Montana earthquake of June 27, 1925, by J. T. Pardee (published Sept. 20, 1926)--------------------------- 7 (C) American Tertiary mollusks of the genus Clementia, by W. P. Woodring (published Nov. 22, 1926)---------------- 25 Index------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 49 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATES 1-2. Species of Placenticeras and M etaplacenticeras ___________ -------- __ --------------------------------_ _ _ 4-5 3. Isoseismallines for Montana earthquake of June 27, 1925------------------------------------------------ 8 4. Geology of the epicentral area, Montana earthquake of June 27, 1925------------------------------------- 8 5. A, Damaged schoolhouse at Three Forks, Mont.; B, Wreck of church at Three Forks, Mont_________________ 10 6. A, Damaged schoolhouse at Manhattan, Mont.; B, Damaged jail at White Sulphur Springs, Mont____________ 10 7. A, Rock slide near Deer Park, Mont.; B, Lake.at tunnel No.8, near Deer Park, Mont______________________ 10 8. A, Broken railroad track near Lombard, Mont.; B, Rocks on railroad track near Lombard, Mont_____________ 10 9. A, B, Fault plane of the slide near Deer Park, Mont____________________________________________________ 10 10. A, North wall of gorge below Deer Park, Mont.; B, Limestone cliffs and talus slope east of Missouri River at Lombard, Mont------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 11. A, Joints in limestone opened by the Montana earthquake; B, Bottom land along Missouri River, Mont______ 10 12. A, Shattered ground and overturned clods, Roy Gulch, Mont.; B, Crack in road embankment north of Three Forks, Mont----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 13. A, Ground crack near Canyon Ferry, Mont.; B, Twisted chimneys at Logan, Mont_________________________ 10 14. American Tertiary species of Clementia s. 8------------------------------------------------------------- 44 15. American Tertiary species of Egesta___________________________________________________________________ 45 16. American Tertiary and living species of Egesta--------------------------------------------------------- 46 17. American Tertiary species of Egesta and doubtful species------------------------------------------------ 47 FIGURE 1. Map showing present range and former distribution of C,leme.ntia s. s. and Egesta___________________________ 27 II 0 SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS -'"fO GENERAL GEOLOGY, 1926 A COMPARISON OF THE GENERA METAPLACENTICERAS SPATH AND PLACENTICERAS MEEK By JoHN B. REEsrnE, Jr. In a recent examination of a considerable suite of ceras as direct descendants of the primitive first lateral specimens from the Western Interior of the United lobe and homologous to the trifid first lateral lobe of States belonging to the Cretaceous ammonite genus Hoplites. Hyatt 'J later interpreted the ontogeny of Placenticeras Meek the writer made comparisons of Placenticeras meeki Bohm ( =P. whitfieldi Hyatt, P. the species from the Interior with those from the placenta (DeKay) of Meek, the type of the genus) Cretaceous of the Pacific coast ordinarily designated as not showing any real relationship with Hoplites. He Placenticeras pacificum J. P. Smith, P. californicum considered the first and second lateral lobes of the Anderson, and P. sanctaemonicae Waring. The two adult suture as derived from marginal lobes of the groups of species differ widely in their characteristics, primitive first lateral saddle and only the third lateral though each is a fairly homogeneous assemblage in lobe of the adult as a lineal descendant of the first itself. It was the writer's intention to propose a new lateral lobe of the early suture. Pervinquiere 4 name for the group of P. 'pacijicum-indeed, one was doubted the generic identity of the forms examined proposed and in type, when the publication by Spath 1 by Smith and Hyatt because of the very marked of the nan1e Metaplacenticeras met the need adequately, differences between P. pacificum and P. californicum, and that name is of course used here. 'Spath's name on the one hand, and P. meeki, P. intercalare, and is based on the citation of Smith's original figure and a other typical species, on the other, though accepting notation that Metaplacenticeras differs from Placenti­ both groups as descended from Hoplites. Sommer­ ceras in its falcoid ribbing and distinct suture line. meier 5 attempted to reconcile the divergent views by Inasmuch as there has been some divergence of opinion interpreting the suture as showing a small lobe di­ as to the scope and probable derivation of the genus viding the primitive first saddle, two -adventitious Placenticeras, based on the study by different writers lobes arising on the siphonal flank of the primitive of members of one or the other of the two groups, the first lateral lobe as forming the first and second writer has thought it worth while to record his observa­ lateral lobes of the adult, and only the third adult tions and deductions and to give a fuller account of lobe as being a direct descendant of the primitive first the new genus. lateral lobe. He considered the primitive second Smith la investigated the young stages of the species lateral lobe to be variable and in P. pacificum to pacificum and on the basis of his findings expressed exceed the fil,'st lateral in length and become the large the opinion that Placenticeras as represented by it fourth adult lobe, whereas in P. meeki it Is relatively was derived through Hoplites from Oosmoceras. He small. The sutures in this view are therefore essen­ found the second, third, and fourth lobes of the adult tially the same and prove a generic identity. He suture to arise from the subdivision of the first lateral suggests as another possibility that the sixth adult lobe of the primitive suture shown in the very early lobe is really t1J_e primitive second lateral' lobe and stages and the first lateral lobe of the adult to arise that the fourth and fifth adult lobes are adventitious. as a marginal lobe dividing the primitive first lateral The writer examined the inner whorls .of typical saddle. Douville 2 had already placed the genus in individuals of the species pacificum Smith and meeki ~he Hoplitidae on the basis of similarity of the early Boehm. He found that he could add nothing to mtures to that of Hoplites, interpreting the first, Smith's description of the young of the first species ;econd, and third lateral lobes of the adult Placenti- and agrees with it entirely. For the second species t Spath, L. F., On new ammonites from the English chalk: Geol. Mag., vol. 63, a Hyatt, Alpheus, Pseudoceratites of the Cretaceous: u: S. Geol. Survey Mon. ;>. 79, 1926. 44, p. 192, 1903. ta Smith, J. P., The development and phylogeny of Placenticeras: California 4 Pervinquiere, Loon, Etudes de pal~ontologie tunisienne, C~phalopodes des i\.cad. Sci. Proc., 3d ser., vol. 1, pp. 181-231, 1900. terrains secondaires, p. 197, 1907. 2 Douvill~, Henri, Classification des c~ratites de la Craie: Soc. g~ol. France Bull, 6 Sommermeier, L., Die Fauna des Aptien und Albien im nordlichen Peru, ml. 18, p. 288, 1890. Pt. I: Neues Jahrb., Beilageband 30, pp. 319-321, 1910. 1 2 SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY, 1926 several interpretations are plausible. Hyatt's fig­ mation of California, and probably also some of the ures 6 of isolated early sutures of P. meeki agree with forms included by Paulcke 9 under the names Hoplites those found by the writer at the same stages, and plasticus-costatus and H. plasticus-laevis, from · the Hyatt's interpretation may well be true. However, Senonian of Patagonia. The essential characters of a more complete series such as that figured in Plate 1 the genus and its differences from Placenticeras are of this paper permits a somewhat different and equally shown in the following tabular comparison based on plausible explanation. Apparently the first of the Smith's description of P. paciflcum and the writer's three large adult lateral lobes is a marginal of the study of P. meeki and other material from the Mon­ primitive first lateral saddle, and the second and third tana group and the Chico formation. are divisions of the primitive first lateral lobe. The M etaplacenticeras Spath. Placenticeras Meek fourth adult lateral lobe is the second primitive' lateral lobe. The writer could detect no sculpture on the Genotype M. pacificum J. P. Genotype P. placenta De Kay. whorls below 6 or 7 millimeters,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    68 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us