Realization of a multi-node quantum network of remote solid-state qubits M. Pompili,∗ S. L. N. Hermans,∗ S. Baier,∗ H. K. C. Beukers, P. C. Humphreys, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, M. J. Tiggelman, L. dos Santos Martins, B. Dirkse, S. Wehner, and R. Hansony QuTech & Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CJ Delft, The Netherlands The distribution of entangled states across the nodes of a future quantum internet will unlock fundamentally new technologies. Here we report on the experimental realization of a three-node entanglement-based quantum network. We combine remote quantum nodes based on diamond communication qubits into a scalable phase-stabilized architecture, supplemented with a robust memory qubit and local quantum logic. In addition, we achieve real-time communication and feed- forward gate operations across the network. We capitalize on the novel capabilities of this network to realize two canonical protocols without post-selection: the distribution of genuine multipartite entangled states across the three nodes and entanglement swapping through an intermediary node. Our work establishes a key platform for exploring, testing and developing multi-node quantum network protocols and a quantum network control stack. Future quantum networks sharing entanglement across We demonstrate the full operation of the multi-node net- multiple nodes [1, 2] promise to enable a range of novel work by running two key quantum network protocols. applications such as secure communication, distributed First, we establish Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) quantum computing, enhanced sensing and fundamen- entangled states across the three nodes. Such distributed tal tests of quantum mechanics [3{8]. Intensive research genuine multipartite entangled states are a key ingredi- efforts in the past decade have focused on realizing the ent for many network applications [2] such as anonymous building blocks of such a network: quantum nodes ca- transmission [19], secret sharing [20], leader election [21] pable of establishing remote entangled links as well as and clock stabilization [8]. Second, we perform entangle- locally storing, processing and reading out quantum in- ment swapping through an intermediary node, which is formation. the central protocol for entanglement routing on a quan- Entanglement generation via optical channels between tum network enabling any-to-any connectivity [22, 23]. a pair of individually controlled qubits has been demon- Thanks to efficient coherence protection on all qubits, strated with trapped ions and atoms [9{12], diamond combined with real-time feed-forward operations, we are Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV) centers [13, 14] and quantum able to realize these protocols in a heralded fashion, de- dots [15, 16]. In addition, a number of quantum net- livering the final states ready for further use. work primitives have been explored on these elementary Our network is composed of three spatially separated two-node links, including non-local quantum gates [17] quantum nodes (Fig. 1A-B), labelled Alice, Bob and and entanglement distillation [18]. Moving these qubit Charlie. Each node consists of an NV center electronic platforms beyond two-node experiments has so far re- spin as communication qubit. In addition, the middle mained an outstanding challenge due to the combina- node Bob employs a Carbon-13 nuclear spin as a memory tion of several demanding requirements. Multiple high- qubit. Initialization and single-shot readout of the com- performance quantum nodes are needed that include a munication qubits are performed through resonant opti- communication qubit with an optical interface as well as cal excitation and measurement of state-dependent fluo- an efficient memory qubit for storage and processing. Ad- rescence [14]. Universal quantum logic on the electronic- ditionally, the individual entanglement links need to be nuclear register is achieved through tailored microwave embedded into a multi-node quantum network, requiring pulses delivered on chip (see Supplementary Material). arXiv:2102.04471v1 [quant-ph] 8 Feb 2021 a scalable architecture and multi-node control protocols. The nodes are connected through an optical fiber network Here we report on the realization and integration of all for the quantum signals, as well as classical communi- elements of a multi-node quantum network: optically- cation channels for synchronizing the control operations mediated entanglement links connected through an ex- and relaying heralding signals (see below). tensible architecture, local memory qubit and quantum Remote entanglement generation hinges on indistin- logic, real-time heralding and feed-forward operations. guishability between emitted photons. For NV centers in high-purity low-strain diamond devices, the optical tran- sition frequencies show relatively minor variations (few GHz). We remove the remaining offsets by employing 1 S. B. is currently at: Institut f¨urExperimentalphysik, Univer- DC Stark tuning at each node via bias fields generated sit¨atInnsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria 2 P. C. H. is currently at: DeepMind, London, UK on chip (Fig. 1C). We are thus able to bring the rele- 3 M. J. T. is currently at: QBlox, 2628 CJ Delft, The Netherlands vant optical transitions of all three nodes to the same ∗ These authors contributed equally to this work frequency, which we choose to be the zero-bias frequency y Correspondence to: [email protected] of Bob. 2 Entanglement A B channel Ex/y Communication qubit VDC E1/2 Polarizer Alice λ/4 λ/2 Lab 2 Entangling Reset Beam-splitter Memory qubit Photon Readout MW detector channel Dichroic Objective mirror 4K Long-distance 30 m C Alice Bob Charlie entanglement 60 58 Lab 1 Bob 56 2 m 54 Charlie Optical fiber Photon frequency 52 connection (GHz, w.r.t 470.4 THz) −20 0 0 20 −10 10 Bias voltage VDC (V) FIG. 1. The three-node quantum network. (A) Layout of the network. Three nodes, labelled Alice, Bob and Charlie, are located in two separate labs. Each node contains an NV center communication qubit (purple). At Bob, an additional nuclear spin qubit (orange) is used in the presented experiments. Fiber connections between the nodes (lengths indicated) enable remote entanglement generation on the links Alice-Bob and Bob-Charlie, which, combined with local quantum logic, allow for entanglement to be shared between all nodes (wiggly lines). (B) Left: simplified schematic of the optical setup at each node (see Fig. S1, Table S1 and Supplementary Material for additional details). Right: Diagram of the relevant levels of the electronic spin qubit, showing optical transitions for remote entanglement generation and readout (\entangling"), qubit reset (\reset"), and resonant microwaves (\MW") for qubit control (see Figs. S2, S3 for additional details). The memory qubit at Bob is initialized, controlled and read out via the electronic qubit (Fig. S4). Optical transition frequencies are tuned via the DC bias voltages (VDC). (C) Tuning of the optical \entangling" transition at each of the three nodes. Solid line is the working point, 470:455 55 THz, dashed line is a guide to the eye. I. ESTABLISHING REMOTE ENTANGLEMENT pendently (Fig. 2B), posing a number of new challenges. IN A NETWORK ARCHITECTURE The different links, and even different segments of the same link, will generally be subject to diverse noise lev- To generate remote entanglement between a pair of els and spectra. Additionally, the optical power levels nodes (i.e. one elementary link) we employ a single- used are vastly different, from microwatts for the exci- photon protocol [24, 25], of which the corresponding cir- tation path to attowatts for the single-photon heralding cuit diagram is depicted in Figure 2A. The communica- station, requiring different detector technologies for op- timal signal detection. We solve these challenges with tion qubits of the nodesp arep each prepared in a super- position state jαi = α j0i + 1 − α j1i . At each node, a hybrid phase stabilization scheme that is scalable to pulsed optical excitation, that is resonant only for the j0i an arbitrary number of nodes. We decompose the effec- state, and subsequent photon emission deterministically tive interferometer for each link into three independently create an entangled state between the communication addressable interferometers and stabilize each separately qubit and the presence/absence of a photon (the flying (see Fig. 2C for the Alice-Bob link; the link Bob-Charlie qubit). The photonic modes from the two nodes are then is phase-stabilized in an analogous and symmetric way, interfered on a beam-splitter, removing the which-path see Figs. S5 to S8). information. The beam-splitter closes an effective inter- First, each node has its own local stabilization that ferometer formed by the optical excitation and collec- uses unbalanced heterodyne phase detection (Fig. 2C, tion paths. Detection of a single photon after the beam-p left). In comparison to the previous homodyne stabiliza- splitter heralds the state j ±i ≈ j01i ± ei∆θ j10i = 2 tion method [14], this enables us to obtain a higher band- between the two communication qubits, where the ± width phase signal from the small part of the excitation sign depends on which of the two detectors clicked and light that is reflected from the diamond surface (≈ 1 %) ∆θ is the optical phase difference between the two arms by boosting it with a strong reference-light beam at a of the effective interferometer (see Supplementary Ma- known frequency offset. Moreover, this scheme allows for terial). Experimentally, this phase difference is set to a optimal rejection of the reflected excitation light by po- known value by stabilizing the full optical path using a larization selection, thus preventing excitation light from feedback loop, as demonstrated in Refs. [14, 16]. This entering the single-photon path towards the heralding de- scheme yields states at maximum fidelity 1 − α at a rate tectors and creating false entanglement heralding events. ≈ 2 α pdet, with pdet the probability that an emitted The measured phase signals are fed back on piezoelectric- photon is detected.