Multi Island, Multi Invasive Species Eradication in French Polynesia Demonstrates Economies of Scale

Multi Island, Multi Invasive Species Eradication in French Polynesia Demonstrates Economies of Scale

R. Griffi ths, S. Cranwell, D. Derand, T. Ghestemme, D. Will, J. Zito, T. Hall, M. Pott and G. Coulston Griffi ths, R.; S. Cranwell, D. Derand, T. Ghestemme, D. Will, J. Zito, T. Hall, M. Pott and G. Coulston. Multi island, multi invasive species eradication in French Polynesia demonstrates economies of scale Multi island, multi invasive species eradication in French Polynesia demonstrates economies of scale R. Griffi ths1, S. Cranwell2, D. Derand2, T. Ghestemme3, D. Will4, J. Zito4, T. Hall4, M. Pott4 and G. Coulston5 1Island Conservation, Warkworth, New Zealand. <rgriffi [email protected]>. 2BirdLife International, Pacifi c Secretariat, Fiji. 3Société d’Ornithologie de Polynésie, Tahiti, French Polynesia. 4Island Conservation, Santa Cruz, CA, USA. 5Good Wood Aotearoa Ltd, Whangarei, New Zealand. Abstract Eradication of invasive vertebrates on islands has proven to be one of the most eff ective returns on investment for biodiversity conservation. To recover populations of the critically endangered Polynesian ground dove (Gallicolumba erythroptera), the endangered white-throated storm-petrel (Nesofregetta fuliginosa), the endangered Tuamotu sandpiper (Prosobonia cancellata) as well as other native plant and animal species, a project was undertaken to eradicate fi ve species of invasive alien vertebrates: Pacifi c rat (Rattus exulans), ship rat (R. rattus), feral cat (Felis catus), rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and goat (Capra hircus), on six islands spanning 320 km of open ocean in the Tuamotu and Gambier Archipelagos of French Polynesia. Using a ship to deliver supplies and equipment, a helicopter for offl oading and bait application, and ground teams for follow up trapping and hunting, invasive vertebrates were successfully removed from fi ve of the six islands. Pacifi c rats survived at one site. The project was planned and executed by a partnership consisting of international and local conservation NGO’s, working together with local communities. Combining the diff erent eradication operations into one expedition added complexity to project planning and implementation and increased the risk of the operation failing on any one island but generated greater returns on investment allowing six islands to be targeted at signifi cantly less cost than if each island had been completed individually. An extensive and thorough planning eff ort, eff ective relationships with local stakeholders and communities, a good operational strategy and a partnership of stakeholders that each brought complementary capacities to the project contributed to its success. Keywords: cat, conservation, goat, rabbit, rat, restoration, threatened species recovery INTRODUCTION The removal of alien species from islands, especially Invasive vertebrates are widely considered the most invasive vertebrates, off ers one of the best returns on signifi cant threat to French Polynesia’s avifauna (Zarzoso- investment for the protection of indigenous biodiversity Lacoste, 2013). Interventions, to remove invasive (Donlan & Wilcox, 2008; Genovesi, 2011). There is vertebrates, could be made to improve security for many now a growing list of island species no longer regarded species. However, investment within the collectivity for as endangered because a key invasive species threat has the management of invasive alien species remains small been lifted (Russell, et al., 2016). The San Nicolas island and a national invasive species strategy has not yet been night lizard (Xantusia riversiana) (Rice & Clark, 2016), developed. The collectivity does not appear to have the the Seychelles magpie robin (Copsychus sechellarum) fi nancial mechanisms to undertake vertebrate eradications (Burt, et al., 2016) and the northern tuatara (Sphenodon and outside fi nancial support will be required if species punctatus) (Towns, et al., 2016) are just three examples of extinctions are to be avoided. the many species whose threat status has been downgraded In 2015, four species of invasive alien vertebrates, to a more secure category as a consequence (IUCN, 2010). Pacifi c rat (Rattus exulans), ship rat (R. rattus), feral cat Eradication projects can be expensive (Simberloff , (Felis catus) and rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), were 2002). The remote nature of many islands and the necessity successfully removed from fi ve of six islands spanning to target every individual within a population requires 320 km of open ocean in the Tuamotu and Gambier extensive planning eff ort, meticulous execution (Cromarty, Archipelagos of French Polynesia. The project failed to et al., 2002) and resourcing that often exceeds the means of remove rats from one project site and completion of goat a single organisation. For many island nations, eradication (Capra hircus) eradication from another was delayed until projects are simply unaff ordable and for some projects, the 2017. cost may exceed the annual environmental expenditure of Here we describe the methods used to remove invasive an entire country. vertebrates from the project sites and the logistics associated French Polynesia is an overseas collectivity (political with the project. We explain how cost effi ciencies were unit) of the French Republic. It is composed of 118 gained by combining operations and targeting multiple geographically dispersed islands and atolls scattered over islands and defi ne how the project partnership was an expanse of more than 5,030,000 km2 in the South Pacifi c instrumental to the project’s success. Ocean. Like many other tropical island archipelagos, French Polynesia is biologically rich and its remoteness METHODS has led its fl ora and fauna to be characterised by high levels of endemism (Gillespie, et al., 2008; Meyer & Butaud, Site description 2009). Sixty three percent of its plants and 72% of its birds Six islands in the south-east of French Polynesia were are found nowhere else (Gillespie, et al., 2008; Meyer & targeted for the removal of invasive vertebrates (Fig. 1). Butaud, 2009). As witnessed elsewhere, French Polynesia These included the two atolls of Vahanga and Tenania has been severely aff ected by habitat loss and invasive (Tenarunga) that, together with Tenararo and Matureivavao, species. Nineteen of its bird species have become extinct make up the Acteon Island Group. Vahanga and Tenararo since the 16th century and of the 25 surviving endemic are identifi ed as a Key Biodiversity Area (Atherton, 2007) birds, 18 are listed as threatened and fi ve as critically and as an Important Bird Area (Raust & Sanford, 2007). endangered (Zarzoso-Lacoste, 2013). Tenararo is one of four islands in French Polynesia never In: C.R. Veitch, M.N. Clout, A.R. Martin, J.C. Russell and C.J. West (eds.) (2019). Island invasives: scaling 611 up to meet the challenge, pp. 611–617. Occasional Paper SSC no. 62. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Island invasives: scaling up to meet the challenge. Ch 3D Strategy: Scaling up part of the year for copra harvesting and Temoe is regularly visited by local fi sherman. Table 1 summarises the general characteristics of the six sites. Project feasibility and planning Planning for rat eradication on Vahanga began in 2006 after a previous attempt undertaken in 2000–2001 was confi rmed as having failed (Pierce, et al., 2006). Research was completed on the atoll to quantify the impact of terrestrial crabs on rodent bait availability, assess bait uptake by rats and quantify the eff ort required to hand broadcast bait across Vahanga (Griffi ths, et al., 2011). Following this, an operational plan for rat eradication on the island was prepared (Broome, et al., 2011), but lack of funding delayed the project’s implementation. A feasibility assessment for the removal of rats from Kamaka and Makaroa, completed in 2008 (Faulquier, 2008), stipulated the need for a helicopter due to the steep topography of these sites. Following several high profi le rat eradication failures on tropical islands, a global review of eradication methods was undertaken in 2013 to increase success rates (Russell & Holmes, 2015). New best practice guidelines were published, recommending higher bait application rates and Fig. 1 Location of the six project sites within French Polynesia. longer periods of bait availability (Keitt, et al., 2015). The new guidelines meant it would be extremely challenging to have had invasive vertebrates and the atoll remains logistically to complete a ground-based operation for a stronghold for the critically endangered Polynesian Vahanga and the use of a helicopter was recommended. ground dove and the endangered Tuamotu sandpiper as Funding for rat eradication on Vahanga was eventually well as other native species (Blanvillain, et al., 2002). The obtained in 2014. However, due to the costs associated operation also included Makaroa, Kamaka and Manui, with transporting a helicopter to the south-east corner of three of the higher elevation islands that form Mangareva French Polynesia and the relatively low cost of including atoll complex and Temoe atoll, which lies to the south of additional sites and invasive species, a decision was Mangareva. Makaroa, Kamaka and Manui, together with made by project partners to target fi ve additional, high the pest-free Motu Teiku, are classifi ed as an IBA (Raust conservation value islands in the area. This decision was & Sanford, 2007). The endangered white-throated storm facilitated by broadening the project partnership and petrel breeds on both Manui and Motu Teiku. securing additional funding. An operational plan was All three of the atolls included in the operation were devised that prescribed the aerial

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us