Antwerp Region (Belgium)

Antwerp Region (Belgium)

Cainozoic Research, 5(1-2), 13-49, November 2006 pp. The gastropod fauna of the Luchtbal Sand Member (Lillo Formation, Zanclean, Early Pliocene) of the Antwerp region (Belgium) ² Robert Marquet¹ & Bernard Landau 'institut royal des Sciences naturelles, Sciences de la Terre, Vautierstraat 31, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. 2 InternationalHealth Centres, Av. Infante D. Henrique, Areias Sdo Joao, 8200Albufeira, Portugal; e-mail; [email protected] Received 23 September2004;revised version accepted 30 June 2005 The gastropod fauna ofthe Luchtbal Sand Member (Antwerp region, Belgium) is listed based on the collections ofthe IRSNB, and new material collectedin Doel (Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium) and Antwerp. Fourteen species are new for the Pliocene of Belgium; onespecies is described is redescribed and is as new: Capulus deurganckensis nov. sp. Xenophora scaldensisGlibert, 1958 a lectotype designated. The total faunaamounts to 157 gastropod species, which make the Luchtbal Member the most species-rich Pliocene unit ofBelgium. Only 29% ofthese species are still living today, which is insufficient for actualistic palaeoecologicalreconstructions. 46% ofthe species are endemic to the Pliocene or to the Neogeneof the North Sea Basin. KEY WORDS:: Pliocene, Luchtbal Sand Member, Belgium, Gastropoda, new taxon. Introduction thick layer (10 to 20 m) of sediment dredged from the Scheldt River, and subsequently built over. The last time The Luchtbal Sand Member was described as the lower- the Luchtbal Sand Member was exposed on the right bank most part ofthe PlioceneLillo Formationby de Heinzelin of the Scheldt River was during the 1970’s, when a junc- (1955c) following Leriche (1912). A type section and lo- tion between the Amerikadok and Vijfde Havendok was cality (Tweede en Derde Havendok in Antwerp, 10 to 8 m created in the Noordkasteel area of Antwerp. The material below the naturalland surface) were proposed by De Meu- collected was never published. Further material, dredged & who also of the de- from the Scheldt River and various localities ter Laga (1976), gave a diagnosis deposited at posit. Vandenberghe etal, (1998) estimatedthe age ofthe in the Antwerp harbour area between 1960 and 1995 is Luchtbal Sand Memberas late Zanclean (± 3.5 Ma), based available. These sediments are often composed of ex-situ on benthic foram association B11, benthic mollusc associa- Luchtbal and Oorderen Sand Member sediments and fau- tionBM22Aand otholith 18 (Vincken, 1988). The Luchtbal sands characterised zone During nas. are by the presence ,h th the 19 and the beginning ofthe 20 century, the Luchtbal of large numbers of Ditrupa sp. and of characteristic bi- Sand Member was often exposed during extensions of the valve species, listed by Marquet (2005, p. 119). Antwerp harbouronthe right bank ofthe Scheldt River. De During the works on the left Scheldt bank harbourat Kallo Heinzelin (1950a, 1950b, 1955a, 1955b) described the (Beveren), no Luchtbal deposits were found untilrecently stratigraphy and the rich molluscan association at the (Marquet, 1995). However, derived yellow sandstones con- Boudewijnsluis section in the 1940’s. His findings were taining large numbers of the bivalve Palliolum gerardi partly published by Gilbert (1957a-c; 1958a-c; 1959a, b; (Nyst, 1835) were oftenencounteredin the basal shell bed 1960). Later taxonomic studies on the Boudewijnsluis ma- of the Oorderen Sand Member, proving that the Luchtbal terial were performed by Marquet (1996: Triphoridae; Sand Member had been present but had been destroyed by 1997, 1998a: turrid gastropods and 2001: Seilinae). Addi- erosion. Also massive numbers of Ditrupa sp. were ob- tional Luchtbal material was collected by van der Mark served in these sandstones. around 1964 at the B1-B2 Havendok section; his material In March 2000, a wedge of Luchtbal Sand Member was is deposited in the NNM Naturalis, Leiden, The Nether- discovered in-situ in the Deurganckdok exposures at Doel lands. (municipality Beveren), extending for about 1 km length Today, only a small part of the type area of the Luchtbal (see Marquet, 2002). Sand Member remains northeast of Antwerp, covered by a - 14- Figure 1. - 15 - Figure 1. 1. Emarginula adriatica Costa, 1829. Deurganckdok, Doel. Luchtbal Sand Member. IRSNB 1ST 6949. 2. Emarginulaplioaspersa Sacco, 1897. Deurganckdok, Doel. Luchtbal Sand Member. IRSNB 1ST 6950. 3. Doel. Luchtbal Sand Coll. BLP. Emarginula sp. Deurganckdok, Member. The level was about 1 m thick at the northern quay of the Emarginula adriatica Costa, 1829 dock and consisted there of yellow sand at the base, often Fig. 1/la-c eroding deeply into the Kattendijk Formation, with burrows filled with Luchtbal Sand extending up to 1 m into this Formation. This lower mollus- *1829 adriatica 12. part yielded a species-rich Emarginula Costa, p, 122, fig. 1916 Emarginula adriatica Costa - Cerulli-Irelli, 217, can fauna, accompanied by many Ditrupa tubes. It was p. 24, 35-36. topped by slightly consolidated sandstones with abundant pi. figs 1923 Emarginulaelongata Costa - Banner, 778, pi. 62, stacked valves ofPalliolum gerardi (Nyst, 1835),together p. fig. 9. with a large number ofbryozoa, few sea urchins and scarce 1949 Emarginulaelongata Da Costa - Glibert,pi. 1, fig, 9. This found the southern gastropods. upper part was only at 1964 Emarginulaelongata Costa - Brebion,pi. 1, figs 7-8. quay ofthe dock. Bivalvia, Scaphopoda and Amphineura 1984 adriatica Costa - Emarginula Piani, p. 200, figs 13- from this were included in the works ofMarquet exposure 20. (2002, 2004). The Deurganckdok of Luchtbal exposure 1990 adriatica Costa - & Emarginula Poppe Goto, p. 67, Sand Member contained several gastropod species new to pi. 2, fig. 17. fauna. the The aim ofthe is - Belgian present paper to assess 1994 Emarginula adriatica Costa Giannuzzi-Savelli et the Luchtbal Sand Member found 73-74. gastropods in the expo- al., p. 46, figs. 2003 Costa - Landau sures at Doel (Deurganckdok), Antwerp (Noordkasteel), Emarginulaadriatica etal., p. 19, pi. and the species in dredged material probably originating 3,figs 1-3. from this Member. For the location ofthe citedexposures see Marquet (1997a, fig. 1), for the extension of the Locus typicus — Adriatic Sea. Luchtbal Sand in the Deurganckdok, see fig. 11. Stratum typicum — Recent. Material and methods Material — IRSNB 1ST 6949 (leg. RM): 1 specimen, Doel, Deurganckdok; Luchtbal Sand Member. This study is based principally on material collected by Robert furtherindicated to be — Marquet (Antwerp), as RM, Dimensions Height 2.4 mm, aperture 12.3 x 7.4 mm transferred to the Institut royal des Sciences naturelles, (incomplete). Brussels (IRSNB) in the near future, from Doel, Noord- kasteel and dredged from the Scheldt River. Further mate- Description — Medium-sizedshell, oval inoutline (width rial from Doel and material is in the collections of of dredged aperture more than halfoflength), posterior partbroader L. Ceulemans coll. from (Brussels, Belgium, LC), Doel in than anterior. Apex strongly pointed, close to posterior that ofB. Landau(Albufeira, Portugal, coll. BLP), A. Rat- border. Posterior side nearly straight, anterior clearly con- inckx coll. AR,), B. Roest Neth- (Antwerp, Belgium, (The vex. Anterior side with slit, running nearly to the apex, erlands, BR). Furthermore, material from the B1-B2 Ha- open for about a quarter of its length, remaining part with collected vendok, by van der Mark, housed in the NNM distinct scales. Ornament consisting ofabout 40 sharp pri- Naturalis The coll. indicated axial with weaker (Leiden, Netherlands, NNM, mary ribs, one secondary rib in between. with RGM numbers) is included. Also the older collections Concentric ornament weaker, forming weak scales be- in the IRSNB examined. were tween, and fainttubercles on the axials. Discussion — (1923) Harmer mentionedthe presence of Systematic palaeontology Emarginula elongata in the Pliocene Coralline Crag For- mationof the British Isles. This name however, according to Sabellietal., 1990,is a synonym ofEmarginula octavi- Class Cuvier, 1797 1839 and Gastropoda ana Coen, was preoccupied by Emarginula elon- Subclass Orthogastropoda Ponder & Lindberg, 1995 gata Defrance, 1819 (= Subemarginula elongata, Eocene Order Salvini-Plawen& Vetigastropoda ofFrance). Emarginula octaviana clearly differs from our Haszprunar, 1987 material by the smaller number of axial ribs (about half), Fissurelloidea 1822 Superfamily Fleming, while its apex points less forward; it is clearly figured by Fissurellidae 1822 Family Fleming, Giannuzzi-Savelli et al. (1994, p. 46, fig. 77). Most ofthe 1834 earlier Subfamily Emarginulinae Gray, records from the Mediterraneanof E. elongata are Genus Emarginula Lamarck, 1801 more similar to E. adriatica than E. octaviana. - 16- Figure 2. - 17 - Figure 2. BLP. 1. Emarginula sp. Deurganckdok, Doel. Luchtbal Sand Member. Coll. 2. Diodora italica (Defiance, 1820). Antwerp, junction Vijfde Havendok-Amerikadok. Luchtbal Sand Member, IRSNB 1ST 6951. Doel. Member. 3. Diodora graeca (Linnaeus, 1758). Deurganckdok, Luchtbal Sand IRSNB 1ST 6952. 4. Gibbula (Steromphala) cineroides (Wood, 1842). Antwerp, Vijfde Havendok. Luchtbal Sand Member. IRSNB 1ST 6953. 5. Gibbula (Colliculus) crassistriata (Bell in Wood, 1882). Deurganckdok, Doel. Luchtbal Sand Member. IRSNB 1ST 6954. This is also the case for most ofthe Pliocene varietiesof E. Figs. 1/3 a-c, 2/1 elongata ‘Costa’, figured by Sacco (1897, pi. 2) and some of his Emarginula cancellata varieties on the same plate. Material — Coll. BLP: I specimen, Deurganckdok,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    37 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us