City of Jersey City Historic Preservation Commission Rules & Regulations for Alterations & Additions to Buildings & New Construction in Historic Districts Adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission March 6, 1992 Adopted by the City Council April 11, 2001 Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Defi nitions III. Windows IV. Storefronts V. Additions VI. Restorations VII. Exterior Doors (Primary Facade) VIII. Ironwork IX. Residential Awnings X. Imitation Cladding XI. New Window Openings XII. Sidewalk Repair and Replacement XIII. Application Procedure XIV. Glossary Appendix A Signs and Billboards Appendix B Standards for New Construction Supplemental Materials I. Introduction of these are row houses built in the Italianate style which was popular from about 1855- 1870. These regulations are issued to assist the pub- lic in applying to the Jersey City Historic Pres- While the Greek Revival and Italianate styles ervation Commission (HPC) for approval of are quite distinct, the composition of the 19th alterations and additions to buildings and new Century row house façade remained much the construction located in the city’s four historic same regardless of the style. The houses are districts. These regulations enunciate Com- usually three-bays wide and two- to three-sto- mission policy with respect to alterations and ries high with basements. The rows are united additions to buildings and new construction by a common cornice line. The main entrance within historic districts and also explain the to the building is on the parlor fl oor and is procedures required to apply for a Certifi cate reached by a stoop, which may be a few simple of Appropriateness or a Certifi cate of No Ef- stone steps in a Greek Revival style house, or fect. a grand fl ight of ten carved brownstone steps with a heavy, ornate cast-iron balustrade in an Jersey City’s four historic districts (Hamilton Italianate style house. Park, Harsimus Cove, Paulus Hook and Van Vorst Park) are located in the downtown and The row house facades in the historic districts share a common history. Downtown Jersey are generally red brick with window lintels City developed around three squares, Paulus and sills, cornices and door surrounds of a dif- Hook (Washington Square), Hamilton and Van ferent material such as wood, metal or stone. Vorst in the mid-19th Century. The earliest of The basement is often faced in stone. Much the three areas, that around Paulus Hook, was attention is placed on the main entrance, which incorporated in 1820 as Jersey City and rein- is located on the side of the façade. Greek Re- corporated in 1838. In 1851, the town of Van vival style entrance surrounds usually have Vorst, which contained what are presently the Doric pilasters with entablatures, while Itali- Van Vorst Park, Hamilton Park and Harsimus anate style entrances often have elaborated Cove Historic Districts, was incorporated into hood moldings resting on foliate brackets. Jersey City. A street plan for the downtown Row houses typically have longer windows was formulated in 1804. A grid of urban resi- on the parlor fl oor. Window shapes and con- dential streets, interspersed with city squares fi gurations vary according to style. Many row or parks and subdivided by commercial thor- houses have shallow front yards or areaways oughfares, the plan was not completely exe- which are fenced in with the same ironwork cuted until the end of the Civil War. which was used for the stoop rail. The urban character of the four historic dis- Until about the time of the Civil War, commer- tricts is largely a result of the predominant cial buildings were residential structures with building type, the 19th Century row house. It ground fl oor and/or basement shop fronts. is not so much the individual row houses, as These buildings are the same scale and style of the homogeneous rows of identical, attached the residential row houses and were often the row house units that defi ne the architectural corner buildings in the rows. character of the historic districts. The fi rst row houses in Jersey City were constructed in After the Civil War, a growing downtown pop- the Greek Revival style from the 1830s to the ulation created the need for larger replacement 1850s and are presently most prevalent in the structures. Interspersed with the row houses Paulus Hook Historic District. The majority are some tenements and small apartment build- of residential buildings in the four historic dis- ings from the late 19th and early 20th centuries tricts were constructed from 1850-1870. Most which are often similar in materials and details to the later row houses. In addition, institutional and commercial buildings from this period add some variety to the primarily residential historic districts in terms of their larger scale, different materials and often unique high-style designs. While there are later 20th Century intrusions and alterations in all of the districts, they are a remarkably intact record of 19th Century residential urban architecture in the Northeast. However, many buildings require maintenance and often replacement of severely deteriorated or missing architectural features. There are also several vacant lots which will undoubtedly be redeveloped in the future. The Historic Preservation Ordinance provides stan- dards for new construction in the historic dis- tricts. These standards, along with those for signage which are also in the Ordinance, are re- produced in Appendix A and Appendix B. In making a determination on a proposed al- teration, addition or new construction, the HPC evaluates the effect of the proposal on the his- toric, architectural and aesthetic values and signifi cance of the historic districts. The Com- mission considers, among other matters, the re- lationship between the proposed work and the architectural style, materials, colors, textures, scale and design of the building, or in the case Italianate Facade of new construction, the surrounding buildings. These regulations are based on the General Standards as stated in Section 12.1 of the His- toric Preservation Ordinance and listed below, and on all other standards included in the Ordi- nance. § 345-71. Historic Design Standards substantiated by historical, physical, or picto- rial evidence rather than on conjectural design A. General Standards or the availability of different architectural el- ements from other buildings or structures. General standards below are considered in- clusive and shall be considered in conjunction 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be with the applicable provisions of any subsec- undertaken with the gentlest means possible. tion of this section. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to shall not be undertaken. provide a compatible use for a property that requires minimal alteration of the building 8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to structure or site and its environment or to use a protect and preserve archaeological resources property for its originally intended purpose. affected by or adjacent to any acquisition, pro- tection, stabilization, preservation, rehabilita- 2. The distinguishing original qualities or tion, restoration, or reconstruction project. character of a building, structure, or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The 9. When the replacements are made, exterior removal or alteration of any historic material architectural elements, such as but not lim- or distinctive architectural features should be ited to windows, doors, and siding, shall be avoided when possible. replaced with a style and fi nish of the period of sgnifi cance of the building. Use of original 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be materials is preferred. recognized as products of their own time. Al- terations which have no historical basis and B. Standards for Protection which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 1. Before applying protective measure, which are generally of a temporary nature and imply 4. Changes, which may have taken place in future historic preservation work, an analysis the course of time, are evidence of the history of the actual or anticipated threats to the prop- and development of a building, structure, or erty shall be made. site and its environment. These changes may have acquired signifi cance in their own right, 2. Protection shall safeguard the physical and this signifi cance shall be recognized and condition or environment of a property or ar- respected. chaelogical site from further deterioration or damage caused by weather or other natural, 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples animal or human intrusions. of skilled craftsmanship, which characterize a building, structure, or site, shall be treated with 3. If any historic material or architectural fea- sensitivity. tures are removed, they shall be properly re- corded and, if possible, stored for future study 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be or use. repaired rather than replaced wherever possi- ble. In the event that replacement is necessary, the new material shall match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities. Repair or replace- ment of missing architectural features shall be based on accurate duplications of features, C. Standards for Stabilization F. Standards for Restoration 1. Stabilization shall reestablish the structural 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to stability of a property through the reinforce- use a property for its originally intended pro- ment of loadbearing members or by arresting pose or to provide a compatible use that will material deterioration leading to structural fail- require minimum alteration to the property ure. Stabilization shall also reestablish weather and its environment. resistant conditions for a property. 2. Reinforcement required for structural sta- 2. Stabilization shall be accomplished in such bility or the installation of protective or code- a manner that it detracts as little as possible required mechanical systems shall be con- from the property’s appearance.