University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for 2003 References L. David Mech USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Luigi Boitani University of Rome, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Mech, L. David and Boitani, Luigi, "References" (2003). USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. 320. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsnpwrc/320 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. References Abrams, P. A. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions. Adams, L. G., B. W. Dale, and L. D. Mech. 1995. Wolf predation on Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:79-105. caribou calves in Denali National Park, Alaska. Pp. 245-60 Abuladze, K. I. 1964. Osnovy Tsestodologii. Vol. IV. Teniaty­ in L. N. Carbyn, S. H. Fritts, and D. R. Seip, eds., Ecology lentochnye gel' minty zhivotnykh i cheloveka i vyzyvaevaniia. and conservation of wolves in a changing world. Canadian Nauka, Moscow. 530 pp. Circumpolar Institute, Edmonton, Alberta. Achuff, P. L., and R. Petocz. 1988. Preliminary resource inventory Adams, L. G., F. G. Singer, and B. W. Dale. 1995. Caribou calf mor­ of the Arjin Mountains Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, People's tality in Denali National Park, Alaska. f. Wildl. Mgmt. 59: Republic of China. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, 584-94· Switzerland. 78 pp. Adams, L. G., and R. 0. Stephenson.1986. Wolf Survey, Gates of Ackerman, B. B., F. A. Leban, M. D. Samuel, and E. 0. Garton. the Arctic National Park and Preserve-1986. U.S. National 1990. User's manual for program Home Range. 2d ed. Tech­ Park Service, Anchorage, AK. nical Report no. 15. Forestry, Wildlife, and Range Experi­ Adams, M.G. 1980. Odour-producing organs of mammals. Symp. ment Station, University ofldaho, Moscow. Zool. Soc. Lond. 45:57-86. Acorn, R. C., and M. J. Dorrance. 1990. Methods of investigating Adorjan, A. S., and G. Kolenosky. 1969. A manual for the identifi­ predation of livestock. Alberta Agriculture, Edmonton. cation of hairs of selected Ontario mammals. Research 36 pp. Report (Wildlife), no. 90. Ontario Department of Lands Adamakopoulos, P., and T. Adamakopoulos. 1993. Wolves in and Forests, Toronto. Greece: Current status and prospects. Pp. 56-61 in Afik, D., and B. Pinshow. 1993. Temperature regulation and water C. Promberger and W. Schroder, eds., Wolves in Europe: economy in desert wolves. f. Arid Environ. 24:197-209. Status and perspectives. Munich Wildlife Society, Etta!, Aho, K. 2000. Wolf attacks 6-year-old near Yukatat. Anchorage Germany. Daily News, 27 April. Adamczewski, J. Z., P. F. Flood, and A. Gunn. 1995. Body compo­ Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 1992. Strategic wolf manage­ sition of muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and its estimation ment plan for Alaska. Alaska's Wildlife, Jan. /Feb., S7-S14. from condition index and mass measurements. Can. f. Zool. Al-Bagdadi, F., and J. Lovell. 1979. The integument. Pp. 78-101 in 73:2021-34· H. E. Evans and G. C. Christensen, eds., Miller's anatomy of Adamic, M. 1993. Status of the wolf in Slovenijia. Pp. 70-73 in the dog, 2d ed. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia. C. Promberger and W. Schroder, eds., Wolves in Europe: Albone, E. S. 1984. Mammalian semiochemistry: The investigation Status and Perspectives. Munich Wildlife Society, Etta!, of chemical signals between mammals. John Wiley and Sons, Germany. New York. Adamovich, V. L. 1985. Rabies in wolves in the central part of the Albone, E. S., and G. C. Perry. 1976. Anal sac secretions of the red Russian valley. Zool. Zh. 64:590-99. fox, Vulpes vulpes; volatile fatty acids and diamines: Impli­ Adams, D. R., and M.D. Wiekamp. 1984. The canine vomeronasal cations for a fermentative hypothesis of chemical recogni­ organ. f. A nat. 138: 771- 87. tion. f. Chern. Ecol. 2: 101-11. Adams, L. G., and B. W. Dale. 1998a. Reproductive performance of Albright, L. B., III. 2000. Biostratigraphy and vertebrate paleontology female Alaskan caribou. f. Wildl. Mgmt. 62: 1184-95. of the San Timoteo Badlands, southern California. University -.1998b. Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 144. Uni­ caribou. f. Mammal. 79:287-94. versity of California Press, Berkeley. 121 pp. 349 350 References Allen, D. L. 1979. Wolves of Minong: Their vital role in a wild com­ systematics, morphology, ecology. [In Russian.] Izdatetvo munity. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. Nauka, Moskva. Allen, W. F. 1937. Olfactory and trigeminal conditioned reflexes in Anisko, J. 1976. Communication by chemical signals in Canidae. dogs. Am. /. Physiol. 118:532-40. Pp. 283-93 in R. L. Doty, ed., Mammalian olfaction, re­ Allendorf, F. W., and R. F. Leary.1986. Heterozygosity and fitness productive processes and behavior. Academic Press, New in natural populations of animals. Pp. 57-76 in M. E. Soule, York. ed., Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity. Aoki, T., and M. Wada. 1951. Functional activity of the sweat glands Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. in the hairy skin of the dog. Science 114:123-24. Almasan, H., G. Scarlatescu, V. Nesterov, and L. Manolache. 1970. Appelberg, B. 1958. Species differences in the taste qualities medi­ Contribution a Ia connaissance du regine de nourriture du ated through the glossopharyngeal nerve. Acta Physiol. loup (Canis lupus L.) dans les Carpathes roumaines. Trans. Scand. 44:129-37. Int. Congr. Game Bioi. 9:523-29. Appleby, M. C. 1993. How animals perceive a hierarchy: Reactions Altmann, D. 1974. Beziehungen zwischen socialer rangordnung to Freeman eta!. Anim. Behav. 46:1232-33. und jungenautzucht bei Canis lupus. Zool. Gart. N.F. lena Archer, J., S. J. Taft, and R. P. Thiel. 1986. Parasites of wolves, 44=235-36. Canis lupus, in Wisconsin, as determined from fecal exami­ ---. 1987. Social behavior patterns in three wolf packs at Tier­ nations.Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 53:290-91. park Berlin. Pp. 415-24 in H. Frank, ed., Man and wolf: Archibald, W. R., D. Janz, and K. Atkinson. 1991. Wolf control: A Advances, issues and problems in captive wolf research. Dr. management dilemma. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Conf 56:497-511. Alvares, F. J. 1995. Aspectos da distribuis;ao e ecologia do lobo no Aristotle. 1783. Histoire des animaux d'Aristote. noroeste de Portugal. Master's thesis, Universidade de Lis­ Arjo, W. M., and D. H. Pletscher. 1999. Behavioral responses of boa, Portugal. coyotes to wolf recolonization in northwestern Montana. Amos, B., C. Schlotterer, and D. Tautz. 1993. Social structure of Can./. Zoo!. 77:1919-27. pilot whales revealed by analytical DNA profiling. Science Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford 260:670-72. University Press, New York. Andelt, W. F. 1985. Behavioral ecology of coyotes in south Texas. Asa, C. S. 1995. Physiological and social aspects of reproduction of Wildlife Monographs, no. 94. The Wildlife Society, Be­ the wolf and their implications for contraception. Pp. 283- thesda, MD.45 pp. 91 in L. N. Carbyn, S. H. Fritts, and D. R. Seip, eds., Ecology Anderson, A. C. 1970. The beagle as an experimental dog. Iowa State and conservation of wolves in a changing world. Canadian University Press, Ames. Circumpolar Institute, Edmonton, Alberta. Anderson, E. 1984. Who's who in the Pleistocene: A mammalian ---. 1997. Hormonal and experiential factors in the expression bestiary. Pp. 40-89 in P. S. Martin and R. G. Klein, eds., of social and parental behavior in canids. Pp. 129-49 in Quaternary extinctions: A prehistoric revolution. University N. G. Solomon and J. A. French, eds., Cooperative breeding of Arizona Press, Tucson. in mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ---. 1996. Preliminary report on the Carnivora of Porcupine Asa, C., and L. D. Mech. 1995. A review of the sensory organs in Cave, Park County, Colorado. Pp. 259-82 inK. M. Stewart wolves and their importance to life history. Pp. 287-91 in and K. L. Seymour, eds., Palaeoecology and palaeoenviron­ L. N. Carbyn, S. H. Fritts and D. R. Seip, eds., Ecology and ments of late Cenozoic mammals: Tributes to the career of conservation of wolves in a changing world. Canadian Cir­ C. S. Churcher. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. cumpolar Institute, Edmonton, Alberta. Anderson, R. K., B. L. Hart, and L. A. Hart, eds. 1984. The pet con­ Asa, C. S., L. D. Mech, and U. S. Seal. 1985. The use of urine, faeces, nection. Proceedings of the Minnesota-California Confer­ and anal-gland secretions in scent-marking by a captive ences on the human-animal bond. Center to Study Human­ wolf (Canis lupus) pack. Anim. Behav. 33: 1034-36. Animal Relationships and Environments, University of Asa, C. S., L. D. Mech, U.S. Seal, and E. D. Plotka. 1990. The in­ Minnesota, Minneapolis. fluence of social and endocrine factors on urine-marking Andersone, Z., V. Lucchini, E. Randi, and J. Ozolins. 2002. Hy­ by captive wolves (Canis lupus). Horm. Behav. 24:497- bridisation between wolves and dogs in Latvia as docu­ 509. mented using mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA mark­ Asa, C. S., E. K. Peterson, U.S. Seal, and L. D. Mech.1985. Deposi­ ers. Mammal. Bioi. 67:79-90. tion of anal-sac secretions by captive wolves Canis lupus. Andersson, T., A.