Knights Landing SCFRR Feasibility Study (Final)

Knights Landing SCFRR Feasibility Study (Final)

Knights Landing Small Community Flood Risk Reduction Feasibility Study July 2019 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. i List of Appendices .......................................................................................................... vii Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 1 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................. 7 1.1 Background ........................................................................................... 7 1.2 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................. 8 1.3 Location and Project Study Area .......................................................... 8 1.4 Related Plans, Programs, Studies, and Projects ................................ 11 Central Valley Flood Protection Plan ........................................ 11 Sacramento River Basinwide Feasibility Study ........................ 11 Lower Sacramento/Delta North Regional Flood Management Plan .......................................................................................... 12 Knights Landing Levee System Emergency Operations Plan Basic Plan 2018 ....................................................................... 12 DWR Non-Urban Levee Elevation Geotechnical Assessment Report ...................................................................................... 13 USACE Yolo Bypass Reconnaissance Study, March 1992 ..... 13 Levee System Wide Improvement Framework, Knights Landing U2 – Yolo Bypass -Service Area 6 Levee System ................... 14 Colusa Trough Drainage Canal (USACE 1993) ....................... 15 Sacramento River Flood Control Project, Mid-Valley Area Phase III Levee Reconstruction Project (USACE/CVFPB) .................. 15 Wallace Weir Improvements .................................................... 16 Agricultural Floodplain Ordinance Task Force Technical Memorandum ........................................................................... 17 The Yolo County Habitat Conservation Plan ............................ 17 Yolo County and Knights Landing General Plans .................... 17 Knights Landing Revitalization Study ....................................... 18 1.5 Stakeholder Engagement ................................................................... 18 2 Problem Identification, Opportunities and Constraints ........................................ 21 2.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................. 21 Hydrology and Hydraulics ........................................................ 21 Topography and Levees .......................................................... 22 Existing Infrastructure .............................................................. 24 Levee Operations and Maintenance and Local Governance for Knights Landing Basin ............................................................. 25 Knights Landing Small Community Flood Risk Reduction Feasibility Study i Flood History ............................................................................ 25 Biological Resources ................................................................ 26 Tribal Cultural Resources ......................................................... 29 Water Supply............................................................................ 29 Funding Sources ...................................................................... 30 2.2 Problems ............................................................................................. 31 Flood Risk ................................................................................ 31 FEMA ....................................................................................... 37 Agricultural Sustainability ......................................................... 40 Habitat/Ecosystem Restoration ................................................ 41 Recreation ................................................................................ 41 Operations and Maintenance and Local Governance .............. 41 Water Supply Reliability ........................................................... 41 Ability to Pay ............................................................................ 42 2.3 Opportunities ...................................................................................... 42 Agricultural Sustainability ......................................................... 42 Habitat/Ecosystem Restoration ................................................ 42 Recreation ................................................................................ 42 Operations and Maintenance and Local Governance .............. 43 Water Supply Reliability ........................................................... 43 3 Plan Formulation ................................................................................................ 45 3.1 Planning Goals and Objectives ........................................................... 45 Flood Risk Reduction ............................................................... 45 Sustaining Agriculture .............................................................. 45 Improving Riverine Habitat Viability .......................................... 46 3.2 Alternatives Development ................................................................... 46 Flood Risk Reduction Alternative Development Measures ...... 47 Evaluation Criteria and Metrics ................................................ 47 3.3 Constraints and Other Considerations ................................................ 49 4 Structural Alternatives ........................................................................................ 51 4.1 Alternatives Description ...................................................................... 51 No Action Alternative ................................................................ 51 Alternative 1 ............................................................................. 51 Alternative 2 ............................................................................. 52 Alternative 3 ............................................................................. 52 Alternative 4 ............................................................................. 53 Alternative 5 ............................................................................. 53 Alternative 6 ............................................................................. 54 Alternative 7 ............................................................................. 54 Alternative 8 ............................................................................. 54 Alternative 9 ............................................................................. 54 Alternative 10 ........................................................................... 54 Alternative 11 ........................................................................... 55 Alternative 12 ........................................................................... 55 Alternative 13 ........................................................................... 55 Knights Landing Small Community Flood Risk Reduction Feasibility Study ii 4.2 Preliminary Screening of Structural Alternatives ................................. 75 Flood Risk Reduction ............................................................... 75 Agricultural Sustainability ......................................................... 75 Capital Cost ............................................................................. 76 Preliminary Evaluation ............................................................. 76 4.3 Proposed Remediations ...................................................................... 77 Through Seepage Remediation ............................................... 77 Underseepage and Through Seepage Remediation ................ 78 Underseepage, Through Seepage, and Stability Remediation 79 Stability Remediation ............................................................... 80 New Cross levee ...................................................................... 80 4.4 Description of Final Array of Structural Alternatives ............................ 81 Alternative 1 ............................................................................. 81 Alternative 3 ............................................................................. 82 Alternative 6 ............................................................................. 82 Alternative 11 ........................................................................... 83 Alternative 12 ........................................................................... 84 Alternative 13 ........................................................................... 85 4.5 Capital Costs ...................................................................................... 93 Cross levee .............................................................................. 93 Fix-in-Place Levee Improvements ............................................ 95 4.6 Financial Feasibility ............................................................................ 97 4.7 Trade-off Analysis

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    148 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us