The Auburn University Disaster Resistant University Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016 Approvable Pending Adoption Draft June 20, 2016 Auburn University Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 01 Executive Summary 1.1 Overview 1‐1 1.2 Organization of the Plan 1‐3 1.3 Hazards and Risks 1‐3 1.4 Capability Assessment & Future Development 1‐5 1.5 Mitigation Strategy 1‐5 1.6 Planning Process 1‐5 1.7 Approval 1‐6 1.8 Implementation 1‐6 1.9 Monitoring and Updating the Plan 1‐6 1.10 Federal Planning Requirements 1‐7 Section 02 University Profile 2.1 Introduction 2‐1 2.2 Location, Climate, and Population of Auburn University 2‐3 2.3 Transportation 2‐5 2.4 Communications 2‐8 2.5 Emergency Services 2‐8 Section 03 Planning Process 3.1 Interim Final Rule Requirement for the Planning Process 3‐1 3.2 Description of the Plan Development Process 3‐1 3.3 Involvement by the Public and Other Interested Parties 3‐7 3.4 Review and Incorporation of Plans, Studies, Reports and Other Information 3‐8 Section 04 Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment 4.1 Interim Final Rule Requirement for the HIRA 4‐1 4.2 Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment 4‐2 4.3 Business Impact Analysis 4‐83 Section 05 Capability Assessment & Future Development 5.1 Overview and Purpose of Capability Assessment 5‐1 5.2 Federal and State Regulations, Plans, and Funding Sources 5‐1 5.3 Assessment 5‐8 5.4 Future Development & Conditions 5‐11 Disaster Resistant University Hazard Mitigation Plan – APA Draft – June 20, 2016 – Page i Auburn University Table of Contents Section 06 Mitigation Strategy 6.1 IFR Requirement for the Mitigation Strategy 6‐1 6.2 Hazard Mitigation Goals 6‐1 6.3 Hazard Mitigation Strategy 6‐3 Section 07 Plan Monitoring & Maintenance 7.1 IFR Requirement for Plan Monitoring and Maintenance 7‐1 7.2 Method for Monitoring the Plan 7‐1 7.3 Schedule for Monitoring the Plan 7‐2 7.4 Method and Schedule for Evaluating and Updating the Plan 7‐3 7.5 Circumstances that will Initiate Plan Review and Updates 7‐4 7.6 Other Planning Mechanisms 7‐4 7.7 Continued Public Involvement 7‐5 Appendices A Review and Approval Documentation B Meeting Documentation C Public and Community Participation D Tabular Data E Business Impact Analysis Documents Disaster Resistant University Hazard Mitigation Plan – APA Draft – June 20, 2016 – Page ii Auburn University Section 01: Executive Summary Section 01 Executive Summary Contents of this Section 1.1 Overview 1.2 Organization of the Plan 1.3 Hazards and Risks 1.4 Capability Assessment & Future Development 1.5 Mitigation Strategy 1.6 Planning Process 1.7 Approval 1.8 Implementation 1.9 Monitoring and Updating the Plan 1.10 Federal Planning Requirements 1.1 Overview On October 30, 2000, the President signed into law the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, also known as DMA 2000. Among its other features, DMA 2000 established a requirement that in order to be eligible to receive federal disaster assistance and grant funds, local and state governments must develop and adopt hazard mitigation plans. On February 26, 2002, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) published an Interim Final Rule (IFR) that set forth the guidance and regulations under which such plans are supposed to be developed. The IFR provides detailed descriptions of both the planning process that states and localities are required to observe and the contents of the plan that emerges. In October 2011, FEMA issued the Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide, which became effective October 01, 2012. In March 2013, FEMA issued the Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, which was effective immediately upon publication. The FEMA document Building a Disaster Resistant University (FEMA 443, August 2003) closely follows the FEMA mitigation planning guidance for local communities, and encourages coordinative efforts among University resources, community stakeholders, local, state and federal government entities, nonprofit organizations, and private sector entities. The Disaster Resistant University (DRU) is a planning initiative designed to develop campus hazard mitigation plans similar to city and county planning efforts, which promotes the need for campus disaster preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery activities. The Auburn University Disaster Resistant University Hazard Mitigation Plan (the Plan) responds to those requirements and guidance. Hazard mitigation is often defined as actions taken to reduce the effects of natural hazards on a place and its population. Auburn University (Auburn) decided to develop this plan because of Disaster Resistant University Hazard Mitigation Plan – APA Draft – June 20, 2016 – Page 1‐1 Auburn University Section 01: Executive Summary continued awareness and understanding that natural hazards have the potential to affect people, physical assets, and operations within the Auburn Campus and other University holdings. Contact information for the Plan is: Mr. Robert Mann Planner, Emergency Management Department of Public Safety & Security Auburn University 543 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36849‐5325 334.844.2237 [email protected] The purpose of a mitigation plan is to rationalize the process of determining appropriate hazard mitigation actions. The document includes a detailed characterization of natural hazards that can affect Auburn, a risk and vulnerability assessment that describes potential losses to physical assets, people, and operations, a mitigation strategy that guides campus mitigation activities, and a detailed plan for implementing and monitoring the Plan. In accordance with federal planning requirements, this Plan also includes details and supporting documentation illustrating the process by which the Plan was developed. The Plan focuses on thirteen (13) natural hazards determined to have the potential to damage physical assets, people, and operations at Auburn University. These hazards are: 1. Communicable disease/pandemic 2. Drought 3. Earthquake 4. Extreme temperature 5. Flood 6. Hail 7. High wind 8. Lightning 9. Severe thunderstorm 10. Sinkhole/land subsidence 11. Tornado 12. Wildfire 13. Winter storm Both the risk assessment and mitigation strategy sections reflect these hazards, which were the result of careful consideration by the Auburn DRU Advisory Committee. Disaster Resistant University Hazard Mitigation Plan – APA Draft – June 20, 2016 – Page 1‐2 Auburn University Section 01: Executive Summary 1.2 Organization of the Plan The Plan is organized to parallel the structure provided in the IFR. The Plan has seven primary sections and several appendices. Section 1 Executive Summary Section 2 University Profile Section 3 Planning Process Section 4 Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment Section 5 Capability Assessment & Future Development Section 6 Mitigation Strategy Section 7 Plan Monitoring & Maintenance Appendices A‐E There are references to the IFR throughout the Plan. Where possible, these provide specific section and subsection notations to aid the review process. 1.3 Hazards and Risks Sections 3 and 4 of this Plan includes detailed descriptions of the process that was used to assess and prioritize Auburn’s risks from natural hazards, qualitative risk assessments for the main Auburn campus as a whole, and more detailed assessments for certain asset classes. Eighteen (18) hazards were considered by the Advisory Committee for potential inclusion in this Plan. This list was discussed and reviewed by the Advisory Committee. After review and discussion, the Committee determined that thirteen (13) of these hazards posed measureable risks to Auburn, and should be included in this Plan. These are: 1. Communicable disease/pandemic 2. Drought 3. Earthquake 4. Extreme temperature 5. Flood 6. Hail 7. High wind 8. Lightning 9. Severe thunderstorm 10. Sinkhole/land subsidence 11. Tornado 12. Wildfire 13. Winter storm Disaster Resistant University Hazard Mitigation Plan – APA Draft – June 20, 2016 – Page 1‐3 Auburn University Section 01: Executive Summary For each of these hazards, the profiles in Section 4 include: . Description . Location . Extent and severity . Potential impact to life, property, and operations . Historic occurrences . Probability of a future occurrence A risk calculation is a FEMA requirement. Risk is a numerical indication of potential future damages. Although the range of events from winter weather to drought all have some potential to affect the Auburn main campus, thirteen (13) hazards were singled out for assessment, based on history and the experience of the Advisory Committee members. All hazards profiled received a qualitative risk assessment. Additional discussion, and consideration of the best data available, identified four (4) hazards to receive an additional quantitative risk assessment: flood, high wind, tornado, and winter storm. These four (4) specific hazards were selected for much more detailed assessments and estimations of future damages. Section 4 includes details about the calculation methodologies and updated results of the campus wide risk and vulnerability assessment; these results are represented in Table 1 (below and following). Risk Assessment Summary Risk to the Risk to Risk to Risk to Mission of Average Risk Hazard People / Assets Infrastructure the Ranking Life Safety /Buildings University Communicable 2.18 1.00 1.32 2.06 1.64 disease/ Moderate Low Low Moderate Low‐Moderate pandemic 1.00 1.21 1.32 1.28 1.20 Drought Low Low Low Low Low 1.13 1.38 1.38 1.47 1.34 Earthquake Low Low Low Low Low 1.50 Extreme 1.26 1.25 1.28 1.32 Low‐ temperature Low Low Low Low Moderate 1.50 1.88 1.85 1.72