Prognosticating Functional Status Post Spinal Cord Injury

Prognosticating Functional Status Post Spinal Cord Injury

Prognosticating Functional Status Post Spinal Cord Injury Dr Peter Lim Senior Consultant, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Singapore General Hospital, Singapore Clinical Professor, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA Epidemiology • Traumatic SCI in US (pop. 300m) : – Incidence: 12,000 (40 per million) – Prevalence: 265,000 (800 per million) • Other countries: Incidence: <20 per million • Singapore (extrapolated): » Incidence: 100/year ? » Prevalence: 2,000? • Non-traumatic SCI: – Spondylosis (esp. cervical),Intervertebral disc disorder, Spinal stenosis, Acute infective, Intraspinal abscess, Tuberculosis, Multiple sclerosis, Benign neoplasm, Malignant neoplasm, Congenital, Idiopathic Regional Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems, USA • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Department of Education • 5-year cycle grant funding • Institutions that are national leaders in SCI care, research, provide highest levels of comprehensive specialty services • National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center University of Alabama/Birmingham https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/ SCI Model System Centers Assessment (Motor) • Most distal segment with normal motor function • Considered normal if at least grade 3, assuming next most proximal muscle tests as 5 Assessment Assessment (Skeletal Level) • X-rays • CT spine • MRI spine Clinical SCI Syndromes • Central Cord Syndrome • Brown-Sequard Syndrome • Anterior Cord Syndrome • Posterior Cord Syndrome • Conus Medullaris Syndrome • Cauda Equina Syndrome American Spinal Injuries Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury) • A: Complete - no sensory or motor function preserved in sacral segments S4-5 • B: Incomplete - sensory but not motor preservation below neurological level and includes S4-5 • C: Incomplete - motor preservation below neurological level; more than half of key-muscles grade < 3 • D: Incomplete - motor preservation below neurological level; at least half of key-muscles grade >= 3 • E: Sensory and motor function normal Functional status by level : C1-C4 • C1-3 likely long term mechanical ventilation • C4 should not need long term • ADLs: dependent, max assist • Mobility: power wheelchair with chin or sip-n-puff control • Assistive technology, e.g. phone, lights, TV, bed controls • Brain Control Interface Functional status by level : C5 • Have use of elbow flexors (Biceps) • ADLs: – independent feeding and grooming with wrist-hand orthoses – can participate with upper body dressing and bed mobility – assisted for transfers, bowel/bladder • Mobility: – power wheelchair with hand controls – manual wheelchair short distances with rim projections – driving specially modified van possible. Functional status by level : C6 • Added wrist extensors permit tenodesis • ADLs: – although uncommon, independent without attendant possible – most require assist with lower body dressing, transfers, bowel/bladder • Mobility: – independent manual wheelchair with rim projections – driving with custom lift and hand control an option Functional status by level : C7 • Able to extend elbow (Triceps) • ADLs: – may achieve independence with or without assistive devices – may need assist with transfers over uneven surfaces • Mobility: – manual wheelchair in community (except with curbs, over steps) – may be independent with driving adapted van or car Functional status by level : C8 • Have functional finger flexion (improved grasp and release) • ADLs: – independent feeding, grooming, dressing, bathing, transfers, bowel/bladder care • Mobility: – independent manual wheelchair propulsion Functional status by level : Thoracic • Have upper limb muscle function • ADLs: – independent • Mobility: – Advanced wheelchair skills: including rough terrain, wheelies for curbs/steps, transfer from floor to wheelchair – Can drive independently with hand controls – T2-9: may stand with bilateral KAFO – T10-12: may walk independently within home with KAFO and walking devices Functional status by level : Lumbar • Good trunk control • ADLs: – independent • Mobility: – advanced wheelchair skills – drive independently with hand controls – can be functionally independent with home and community ambulation, usually with devices – full or part-time manual wheelchair often necessary Prognosis for Ambulation after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury 100 • Initial ASIA Impairment Scale 90 (at 72 hours-1 week): 80 – A: 3% 70 60 – B: 50% 50 – C: 75% 40 – D: 95% 30 20 Consortium for Spinal Cord 10 Medicine: Clinical Practice 0 Guidelines, 1999, PVA ASIA A ASIA B ASIA C ASIA D Return to Work (RTW) • Systematic review of 123 references • Working at time of SCI injury: – 21-67% returned to work • RTW higher when: – injured at younger age – less severe injuries – higher functional independence • Also: – RTW improved with time after injury – overall, employed: 11.5-74% – SCI at childhood/adolescence -> higher adult employment rates – Barriers: transportation, health/physical limitations, lack of work experience/education/training, physical/architectural barriers, discrimination, loss of benefits Lidal IB et al: Disabil Rehabil 2007, 29(17): 1341-75 Spinal cord injury: Costs (US) Survival • 9,135 subjects from 1973-84 • Cumulative 12-year survival 85.1% (88.2% of normal) • Mortality rates ranged from 1.68 to 15.98 times higher than normal – Range: • 95% (>96% of normal) for those younger than 25 years at injury and neurologically incomplete • 18.1% (26.9% of normal) for 50 years and older with complete tetraplegia DeVivo MJ et al: Prognostic factors for 12-year survival after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73(2): 156-62 Survival Spinal Cord Injury Facts and Figures at a Glance, Feb 2011, (28,000 subjects) National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, Birmingham, Alabama Summary of Factors for Prognosticating Functional Status in SCI • Severity of cord damage • Completeness of injury • Level/location of cord injury • Early recovery • Surgery: no difference • REHABILITATION Thank You .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us