
Effect of Hyperons on Pion Asymmetries Measured in the Q weak Experiment Marcus Sundar Starman May 5, 2015 Abstract Experimental nuclear physics has largely been concerned with testing the Standard Model of particle physics. The Q weak experiment was designed to measure the weak interaction force of the proton. The experiment was also used to make asymmetry measurements on pions produced by inelastic collisions. The asymmetry measured in the experiment for pions was larger than expected at lower momentums given the kinematic conditions. A possible cause for the larger asymmetry is the production of hyperons, which decay into pions that can be detected. This idea was investigated, and an acceptance function for these pions was formulated. The acceptance function took the form of a four dimensional vector structure based on the probability of the pions being detected based on their initial kinetic energy, θ angle, φ angle, and z position. 1 Introduction The Standard Model of particle physics was formulated in the 1970s. This model is the gov- erning theory for the different types of particles and their interactions. The model provides for a small number of particles that are the building blocks of all matter; six leptons and six quarks. Leptons are the electron, muon, and tauon, and each has a corresponding neutrino. Quarks are up and down, charm and strange, and top and bottom. These basic particles make up other subatomic particles, such as two up quarks and a down quark make a proton, and two down quarks and an up quark make a neutron, as seen in Figure 1. Figure 1: A graphic of the quark structure of the proton and the neutron, showing the quark flavors present in each particle. The Standard Model describes the interactions of these basic particles, and the particles that they construct. There are four types of fundamental interactions; strong, electromag- netic, weak, and gravitational [4]. The strong interaction binds quarks together in protons and neutrons, and binds protons and neutrons together in the nuclei; these interactions are mediated by gluons. Electromagnetic interactions bind electrons with nuclei, and dominate the intermolecular forces in liquids and solids; these interactions are mediated by photon 1 exchange. Weak interactions are responsible for radioactive decay, including β-decay, or the emission by a proton or neutron of an electron and neutrino, and the decay of one particle into another; the mediators are the W and Z bosons. The weak interaction is parity depen- dent, which means it is dependent upon the spins of the interacting particles, specifically because it violates parity. This is in contrast to the electromagnetic interaction, which can be dependent on spin states but conserves parity symmetry. Gravitational interactions exist between all particles, but on the scale of particle physics it is dominated by the other inter- actions, because gravitational interactions are mass dependant; the graviton is thought to be the mediator. Qweak was an experiment designed to directly measure the weak interaction of the proton through elastic electron scattering [3]. This experiment was conducted in Hall C at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. The setup consisted of a liquid hydrogen (LH 2) target, collimators, a toroidal magnet, and a ring of eight detectors. An incoming electron beam from the accelerator would scatter off of the protons in the LH 2 target. The electron beam was run at 1.16 GeV, and could be set to a helicity of +1 or −1, setting a spin for the incoming electron to parallel or anti-parallel. The electrons would scatter elastically off of the protons, and then went through a series of collimators and were redirected by a magnetic field before being picked up by a ring of eight detectors, consisting of eight Cherenkov bars with a Photomultiplier Tube (PMT) on either end of the bar [6] (see Figure 2). The quartz Cherenkov bars are a scintillating material, meaning that when particles such as pions interact with the material, photons in the form of Cherenkov radiation are released. When a photon reaches the PMT, it causes an electron to be knocked loose, and the signal exponentially increases as it moves through the PMT, generating a large signal at the end. 2 Using the condition that photoelectrons be detected in both PMTs for a detector for a single event, I was able to filter out useful events from noise. Q weak was able to measure the weak Figure 2: The set up for the Q weak experiment. The liquid hydrogen target, collimators, magnet, and detectors are labeled [5]. interaction force of the proton to a greater accuracy than previous experiments, and was also the first experiment to make this measurement directly. The experiment functioned as a Standard Model test by detecting electrons that scattered elastically off of protons. ‘Elastic’ scattering means that momentum and kinetic energy are conserved in the scattering interaction. Protons and electrons interact through both the electromagnetic interaction and the weak interaction. The electromagnetic interaction is parity conserving; parity is the idea that when particles interact, the interaction does not depend on the spin state of the particles. Specifically, if we switch from a left-handed to a right-handed coordinate system, the spin 3 vector of the particle stays the same, as depicted in Figure 3. However, the weak interaction violates parity. To pick out the weak interaction from the magnetic interaction, the helicity of the incoming beam of electrons was switched between −1 and +1, polarized along the z axis. Between the two helicities, the differences in the scattering could only be caused by the weak interaction. Figure 3: Depiction of parity conservation when switching from a left to a right-handed coordinate system. The vertical arrow is the angular momentum vector, representing the spin of the particle. Qweak was also run with a beam energy of 3.35 GeV, to measure an asymmetry more closely related to proton structure. This causes the electrons to exhibit inelastic scattering off of the protons, where kinetic energy is not conserved, causing some of the energy to go into pion creation. The experiment was set to detect pions, and when the momentum cutoff for detection was lowered by a factor of three, large pion asymmetries were measured by the detectors. The asymmetry can be calculated by looking at the small differences in the momentum distribution between the two helicities. The asymmetry is calculated using: ρ − ρ − A = helicity+1 helicity 1 , (1) ρhelicity+1 + ρhelicity −1 4 where ρ is the momentum distribution. This equation gives the asymmetry because the electron-proton electromagnetic interaction is the same for both helicities, so any momen- tum difference would have to be due to the weak interaction. To actually find the asymmetry, I used histograms of the momentum distribution and applied Equation 1. During the exper- iment, the strength of the magnetic field was varied to include pions of different energies. The correlation between the pion’s momentum and the magnetic field current is that higher energy particles require a stronger magnetic field for the particle’s path to be bent to the detectors, while this will push lower energy particles outside of the ring of detectors. Al- ternatively, lower energy particles require a weaker magnetic field for detection, and this will allow higher energy particles to continue almost straight through the experiment, in the middle of the detector ring. Depending on the energy of the incoming beam, various other particles can be produced, including hyperons. Hyperons are a type of particle consisting of three quarks, characterized by having at least one strange quark. The lowest energy hyperons, Λ hyperons, go through spontaneously weak decay into a proton and a π-, or a neutron and a π0. Λ hyperons have a lifetime on the order of 10 -10 seconds, through the decay of the strange quark into an up or down quark (Figure 4). The momentum of these pions is dependent upon the helicity of the incoming beam, as well as the spin state of the individual hyperon. Hyperons are self analyzing, meaning that the spin angular momentum directly affects the momentum vector of the decay particles. These factors have the potential to cause large discrepancies in the pion asymmetry with the production of only a few hyperons, because the pions are only affected by the weak interaction. My research attempted to explain the large pion asymmetry at lower momentums through 5 (a) Λ0 hyperon decay to a proton (b) Σ+ hyperon decay to a pro- and a π-. ton and a π0. (c) Σ0 hyperon decay to a Λ0 hy- peron and a photon. Figure 4: Feynman diagrams of the weak decay of various hyperons [1]. the production of hyperons that decay into pions that are detected and affect the asymmetry measurements. Once I established that hyperons could produce the asymmetries seen in the Qweak data, I worked on creating an acceptance function. The acceptance function used the probability of a pion being detected based on its position, energy, and polar angles, and combined that with the hyperon cross-section that would produce that particular pion. By combining the probability of a pion being detected with the probability of that pion being produced, we will be able to determine the effect of hyperons on the Q weak ’s auxiliary results. I am organizing the acceptance function in the form of a look-up table of vectors contained within other vectors. 6 2 Experiment I used a hyperon generator code written in C++ by Dr. Konrad Aniol of California State University, Los Angeles, to conduct my verification for the potential impact of hyperons on Q weak measurements [2].
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages38 Page
-
File Size-