Demonstration of the trapped-ion quantum CCD computer architecture J. M. Pino,∗ J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, M. S. Allman, C. H. Baldwin, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer, C. Ryan-Anderson, and B. Neyenhuis Honeywell Quantum Solutions, 303 S. Technology Ct., Broomfield, Colorado 80021, USA The trapped-ion QCCD (quantum charge-coupled de- plex quantum algorithms. While small trapped-ion quan- vice) proposal [1,2] lays out a blueprint for a universal tum computers only require a single ion crystal in a single quantum computer. The proposal calls for a trap de- trapping region, this approach is unlikely to scale beyond vice to confine multiple arrays of ions, referred to as ion one hundred qubits [11]. Efforts have therefore focused crystals. Quantum interactions between ions in a sin- on architectures that use either a network of ion crystals gle crystal occur via electric- or magnetic-field induced connected through photonic links [12, 13] or physically spin-motion coupling. Interactions between ions initially transporting ions between different crystals [14, 15] and in different crystals are achieved by using precisely con- eventually even across trap modules [16]. In this article trolled electric fields to split the crystals, transport the we demonstrate progress towards the latter approach. ions to new locations, and then combine them to form The QCCD architecture aims to create a high fidelity, new crystals where the desired interactions are applied. scalable quantum computer, at the cost of some chal- High-fidelity physical transport is the key to two advan- lenging requirements: 1 { a device that can trap multi- tages of the QCCD architecture: high-fidelity interac- ple small ion crystals capable of high fidelity operations, tions between distant qubits and low crosstalk between 2 { fast transport operations for moving ions between gates. High-fidelity interactions between distant qubits crystals, 3 { tracking of qubit phases and synchroniza- are enabled by transport that is fast relative to the long tion of the control signals across multiple regions, 4 { coherence times of the qubit, chosen as atomic clock the likely need for trapping two different ion species, one (magnetic-field insensitive) states, as well as the insensi- as a qubit and another to sympathetically cool the crys- tivity of the ion's internal degrees of freedom to the elec- tals back to near the motional ground state after trans- tric fields used for transport. Low crosstalk is achieved port, and 5 { parallelization of transport and quantum by the physical separation between qubits in different operations across the device. Many of these difficulties locations, thereby preserving the low error rates demon- have been addressed individually [17{21], but combin- strated in small trapped-ion experiments [3{5]. However, ing these features into a single machine creates perfor- engineering a machine capable of executing these opera- mance requirements that are difficult to reconcile: for tions across multiple interaction zones with low error in- example, high fidelity qubit operations require minimal troduces a host of difficulties that have slowed progress in motional excitation and thus low electrode-voltage noise, scaling this architecture to larger qubit numbers. Using a while fast transport requires high bandwidth voltage con- Honeywell cryogenic surface trap, we report on the inte- trols for those same electrodes. Previous efforts, e.g. refs. gration of all necessary ingredients of the QCCD architec- [6, 15, 22], have demonstrated impressive progress to- ture | a scalable trap design, parallel interaction zones, wards a scalable QCCD based quantum computer but and fast ion transport | into a programmable trapped- have lacked multiple parallel operation zones, sympa- ion quantum computer. Using four and six qubit cir- thetic cooling, or were limited to a single qubit pair. cuits and two parallel interaction zones, the system level performance of the processor is quantified both by the In this article, we report on the most advanced re- fidelity of a teleported CNOT gate utilizing mid-circuit alization of a QCCD based quantum computer to date encompassing all of the above capabilities. Using up to arXiv:2003.01293v4 [quant-ph] 9 Apr 2021 measurement [6] and a quantum volume [7] measurement of 26 = 64. We find that the overall system performance six qubits, the system operates with low error rates even is consistent with the low error rates achieved in the indi- for deep circuits comprising many transport and gating vidual ion crystals, demonstrating that the QCCD archi- operations achieving the maximal quantum volume[7] al- tecture is a viable path towards high performance quan- lowed by six qubits without being limited by errors. In tum computers. addition, we demonstrate small crosstalk errors and that the system is capable of mid-circuit measurements and The first quantum logic gates were performed with conditioned feedback [23]. With relatively straightfor- trapped ions [8,9], and since then researchers have ward upgrades to the optical delivery and ion transport demonstrated coherence times as well as gate, state sequences, our architecture will be able to accommodate preparation, and measurement fidelities that are among more qubits. the best of any viable quantum computing platform [3{ Requirement 1 of the architecture is the simultane- 5, 10]. Recently, researchers have focused their attention ous trapping of multiple ion crystals capable of high fi- towards scaling to larger qubit numbers needed for com- delity quantum operations. The ion trap presented in 2 this work (Fig.1) has a linear geometry set by RF elec- (a) trodes (Fig.1b) that provide a uniform radial trapping force in the y and z directions along a line (called the RF- null) 70 µm above the surface (coordinate axes shown in Detection Fig.1b). Additional trapping potentials and transport electronics capabilities are provided by the 198 independently con- |0⟩ trolled DC electrodes. The geometry is flexible enough ! Opto-electronics ! to admit different modes of operation, but we limit our (b) ! description to the case where the trap is understood as ! consisting of sixteen different zones identified in Fig.1 as gate, extended gate, auxiliary and loading zones. Only (c) the gate and extended gate zones, which are identical in size but with differing numbers of electrodes, are suit- Gate 0 1 2 3 able for complex transport operations, making them the transport 0 3 most convenient for quantum operations. Here, we use the extended gate and gate zones closest to the loading Gate 0 1 2 3 hole for convenience (Fig.4) and refer to them as gate transport 1 2 zones 1 and 2 respectively. All quantum operations are executed in these gate zones using lasers propagating par- Gate 0 2 1 3 allel to the trap surface. The beams are focused to a spot size small enough to address a single zone but not small FIG. 1. The programmable QCCD quantum computing sys- enough for individual addressing within a single ion crys- tem. (a) Right, a picture of the trap. Left, the information tal. This means that entangling two-qubit (TQ) gates flow from the user to the trapped ion qubits. From top to between arbitrary pairs, and any single-qubit (SQ) gate, bottom, we illustrate: user, cloud, internal tasking, machine measurement, or reset all require ion rearrangement. control system, FPGA. The circuits are processed by a com- piler to generate control signals (purple) sent to both the trap In this article we limit the modes of operation to either and the optoelectronic devices controlling the laser beams. An N = 4 or N = 6 qubits, always matching the number of imaging system and PMT array collect and count scattered 171Yb+ qubit ions to 138Ba+ coolant ions. The machine is photons, and the results (green) are sent back to the software initialized with one (Ba-Yb-Yb-Ba) crystal in each of the stack and user, or processed for real-time decision making. two gate zones for the N = 4 mode and with additional (b) A schematic of the trap: RF electrodes (green), loading (Yb-Ba) pairs in the load and first auxiliary zones for the hole (black), load zone (pink), extended gate zones (orange), gate zones (blue), and auxiliary zones (yellow) for qubit stor- N = 6 mode. age. In this work, only the gate zones with grey circles are A quantum computation begins with a user submit- used. (c) A general quantum circuit: ions already sharing a ting a program in the form of a quantum circuit. A gate zone are gated, then spatially isolated for SQ gates, then compiler assigns qubits to physical ions so as to mini- the second and third ions are swapped for the final TQ gates. mize the number of transport operations needed and the While not shown, readout, TQ gates, and SQ gates can all be circuit proceeds as a series of transport and gating oper- performed in parallel across different zones. ations, pairing and isolating qubits appropriately for SQ and TQ gates, and measurements. After completing all of the operations, the ions are returned to the initial con- zones. figuration so that the circuit can be repeated to gather Swap: The qubit order of a 4-ion crystal is flipped by measurement statistics before sending the results back to rotating the qubits about an axis perpendicular to the the user. RF-null [26]. These operations only occur in gate zones. Transport (requirement 2) is achieved through dy- As described in the Methods section (Table II), the namic voltage waveforms applied to the DC electrodes, individual transport operations have durations ranging and falls into three categories: from 50 to 300 µs and introduce a moderate amount Linear transport: A potential well is moved along of motional excitations to the ion crystal comparable the RF-null from one position to another [24].