Problems on Low-Dimensional Topology

Problems on Low-Dimensional Topology

Update: July 3, 2010 Problems on Low-dimensional Topology Edited by T. Ohtsuki1 This is a list of open problems on low-dimensional topology with expositions of their history, background, signi¯cance, or importance. This list was made by editing manuscripts written by contributors of open problems to the problem session of the conference \Intelligence of Low-dimensional Topology" held at Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University in June 2{4, 2010. Contents 1 Surjective homomorphisms between 2-bridge knot groups 2 2 Extensions of Burau representation of the braid groups 2 3 A conjugation sub-quandle of PSL(2; Fq) 3 4 Ck-concordance among string links 6 5 Planar algebras 7 6 The Rasmussen invariant of a knot 8 7 Exceptional surgeries on knots 11 8 Minimal dilatation of closed surfaces 13 9 The magic \magic manifold" 14 10 The w-index of surface links 15 11 Invariants of 3-manifolds derived from their covering presentation 16 12 Sutured manifolds and invariants of 3-manifolds 17 13 Sutured Floer homology 18 1Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, JAPAN Email: [email protected] 1 1 Surjective homomorphisms between 2-bridge knot groups (Masaaki Suzuki) Let K be a knot in S3 and G(K) the fundamental group of the complement 3 S ¡ K. We write K1 ¸ K2 if there exists a surjective homomorphism from G(K1) onto G(K2). It is well known that this relation ¸ is a partial order on the set of prime knots. This partial order is determined on the set of prime knots with up to 10 crossings in [50]. Furthermore this result is extended to the set of prime knots with up to 11 crossings in [30]. In this section, we focus on surjective homomorphisms between 2-bridge knot groups. Schubert showed that 2-bridge knots are classi¯ed by Schubert normal forms, which are rational numbers. Let K(r) denote the 2-bridge knot corresponding to a rational number r. Ohtsuki-Riley-Sakuma [73] gave a systematic construction which, for a given 2-bridge knot K(r), provides surjective homomorphisms from K(~r) onto K(r). On the other hand, Lee-Sakuma [52] showed that the converse statement holds in a sense, that is, they describes all upper-meridian-pair-preserving surjective homomorphisms between 2-bridge knot groups. The following is a very simple question about this subject. Question 1.1 (M. Suzuki). Does there exist a 2-bridge knot which surjects simul- taneously onto G(31) and G(41)? The author con¯rmed that there exists no such 2-bridge knot with up to 20 crossings. The above problem is one of the simplest model of the following problem. Problem 1.2 (M. Suzuki). For given two rational numbers r and r0, determine whether there exists a 2-bridge knot K(~r) such that K(~r) ¸ K(r) and K(~r) ¸ K(r0). In other words, ¯nd an algorithm to determine whether there exists such a 2-bridge knot K(~r) or not. If it is possible to answer the above problem, we can describe the Hasse diagram of 2-bridge knots with respect to the partial order ¸. 2 Extensions of Burau representation of the braid groups (Hiroshi Matsuda) ¡1 Burau [9] introduced a representation 'n : Bn ! M(n; Z[t; t ]) of the braid group Bn de¯ned by 0 1 Ii¡1 OO O B O 1 ¡ t t O C ' (σ ) = B C ; n i @ O 1 0 O A O OO In¡(i+1) where σ1; ¢ ¢ ¢ ; σn¡1 denote the usual generators of Bn. He constructed from 'n a knot invariant which is essentially equal to the Alexander polynomial ¢K (t) of a knot K. 2 I propose to extend 'n by choosing a non-commutative algebra ­ instead of Z[t; t¡1]. Consider a mapping de¯ned by 0 1 Ii¡1 OO O B O ® ¯ O C à (σ ) = B C ; n i @ O γ ± O A O OO In¡(i+1) µ ¶ ® ¯ where ®; ¯; γ; ± 2 ­. We suppose that is invertible in M(2; ­). The above γ ± mapping can be extended to a representation Ãn : Bn ! M(n; ­) if ®; ¯; γ; ± sat- isfy some polynomial equations derived from the relation Ã3(σ1)Ã3(σ2)Ã3(σ1) = Ã3(σ2)Ã3(σ1)Ã3(σ2). When the inverses of ® and ¯ exist, those polynomial equa- tions are simpli¯ed as follows, 8 <> γ = ®¡1¯¡1®(1 ¡ ®); ± = 1 ¡ ®¡1¯¡1®¯; (1) :> ¯®¡1¯¡1® ¡ ®¡1¯¡1®¯ ¡ ® + ¯¡1®¯ = 0: (In general, we do not have to assume the existence of ®¡1 and ¯¡1.) Problem 2.1 (H. Matsuda). Choosing your favorite algebra ­ with unit 1, construct a knot invariant from the above representation Ãn. When ­ = M(2; C), it is shown in [58] that there is a 6-parameter family of solutions of (1) and we can construct a knot invariant from the corresponding repre- sentation Ãn, though it might be equal to the product ¢K (t1)¢K (t2) of two copies of the Alexander polynomial. 3 A conjugation sub-quandle of PSL(2; Fq) (Yuichi Kabaya) n Let p be a prime, and let Fq be the ¯nite ¯eld of order q = p . We de¯ne the F2 n f g f§ g quandle Xq to be the set ( q 0 )= 1 with the binary operation given by µ ¶ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¢ 1 + c d d2 c0 d0 ¤ c d = c0 d0 : ¡c2 1 ¡ c d We see that Xq can be regarded as a sub-quandle of the conjugation quandle of PSL(2; Fq), as follows. A conjugation quandle of a group is the group with the ¤ ¡1 F binary operation x y = y xyµ. Let¶ PSL(2; q) be the projective special linear 1 1 group over F , and put h = . Let X0 be the sub-quandle fg¡1hg j g 2 q 0 1 q F g F 0 PSL(2; q) of the conjugation quandle of PSL(2; q). Then, Xq can naturally be identi¯ed with Z(h)nPSL(2; Fq), where Z(h) denotes the centralizer of h. Further, 3 n µ ¶ o 1 ¤ ¡ ¢ since Z(h) = , Z(h) is equal to the stabilizer of 0 1 with respect to 0 1 F F2 ! 0 the right action of PSL(2; q) on q. Thus, weµ have¶ an isomorphism Xq Xq ¡ ¢ a b taking 0 1 g to g¡1hg. That is, putting g = , this is the isomorphism µ ¶ c d ¡ ¢ 1 + c d d2 taking c d to . ¡c2 1 ¡ c d Many knots admit non-trivial colorings by Xq. Let K be a hyperbolic knot. Then 3 3 3 we have a holonomy representation ' : ¼1(S nK) ! PSL(2; C) so that H ='(¼1(S n K)) is isometric to S3 n K. In particular, ' takes each meridian to a parabolic element of PSL(2; C), which is conjugate to h. Since the holonomy representation ' is characterized by a ¯nite number of algebraic equations in PSL(2; C), ' is conjugate to a representation into PSL(2; F) for some ¯nite extension ¯eld F of Q. Further, in many cases,2 ' is conjugate to a representation into PSL(2; O), where O is the ring of algebraic integers of F. Let p be a prime ideal of O over (p) ½ Z. Then the residue ¯eld O=p is an extension of Fp, and hence it is isomorphic to Fq with some n 3 q = p . This induces a representation ¼1(S n K) ! PSL(2; Fq). Further, it induces a Xq-coloring of a knot diagram D of K, where a Xq-coloring of a knot diagram D is a map from the set of arcs of D to Xq which satis¯es the relation shown in Figure 1 at each crossing of D. We can naturally regard a Xq-coloring of D as a quandle homomorphism from the knot quandle of K to Xq. x y x ¤ y Figure 1: De¯nition of a coloring at a crossing Problem 3.1 (Y. Kabaya). Compute the quandle (co)homology of Xq. ¤ F ! ¤ p We have a natural map H (PSL(2; q)) HQ(Xq). It is known [69] that \vol + ¡1 CS" of a 3-manifold can be presented by using a 3-cocycle of PSL(2; C), where \vol" and \CS" denote the hyperbolic volume and the Chern-Simons invariant; see also [35] for such a presentationp using a quandle 3-cocycle. We expect that invariants like \mod p version" of \vol + ¡1 CS" are obtained from cocycles of Xq. When q = 2, X2 is isomorphic to the dihedral quandle R3. When q = 3, X3 is isomorphic to the Alexander quandle Z[T §1]=(2;T 2 + T + 1). ~ F2 n f g We de¯ne the quandle Xq to be the set q 0 with the same binary operation ~ as Xq. The quotient map Xq ! Xq is a central extension of Xq by Z=2Z; see [14] for the de¯nition of quandle extensions. This extension seems to be non-trivial. 2For example, if the knot complement has no closed essential surface, the holonomy representation ' is conjugate to a representation into PSL(2; O); see e.g. [57, Theorem 5.2.5], [87, Theorem 6.7.5]. Note also that, even if ' was 3 not conjugate to a representation into PSL(2; O), ' induces a representation ¼1(S n K) ! PSL(2; Fq) in a similar way, for all but ¯nitely many p. 4 `0 1´ `¡t2 1´ `0 1´ `t(1+t2) ¡t´ `t 0´ Figure 2: A general non-trivial Xq-coloring of a diagram of the ¯gure-eight knot For example, we show a general non-trivial Xq-coloring of a diagram of the ¯gure- eight knot in Figure 2.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us