Von Mises Criteria

Von Mises Criteria

Example comapring failure criteria Stress analysis of a spacecraft structural member gives the state of stress as shown below. If the part is made from an alloy with Y = 500 MPa, check yielding according to Rankine, Tresca and von Mises criteria. What is its safety factor for each criterion? Maximum principal stress Criterion (Rankine) ⎡⎤200 0 0 ⎢⎥ σ=⎢⎥0100−30MPa ⎣⎦⎢⎥03−−050 • The principal stresses are: σ=12200; σ=105.77; σ3=−55.77; • Maximum principal stress is 200MPa • Factor of safety FS=500/200=2.5 Maximum shear stress Criterion (Tresca) Y • Yield function f =−σe 2 σσ− 200 + 55.78 σ ==13 =127.89 MPa • Maximum shear stress e 22 • Shear stress for uniaxial tension Y = 250 MPa f =−127.89 250 <0 2 • Factor of safety FS=250/127.89=1.95 Distortional Energy Density Criterion (von Mises) • Yield function f = 1 σ −σ 22+ σ −σ + σ −σ 2−Y =224 −500 2 ()12 ()23 (31) • Factor of safety FS=500/224=2.2 • Why are all the results so close? σ=12200; σ=105.77; σ3=−55.77; Other yield criteria • For isotropic materials there is usually substantial difference between yield in tension and compression. Why? • For orthotropic materials there is also differences between the behavior along the three principal directions and between shear and normal stresses • Fortunately, for most applications we have at least transverse isotropy 4.5.1 Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion (Charles Augustin de Coulomb, 1736-1806, Christian Otto Mohr, 1835-1918) • Yield of materials like rock and concrete does change with hydrostatic pressure • Yield function written in terms of cohesion c and internal friction angle φ as fc=−σ13σσ+()1+σ3sinφ−2 cosφ σ1≥σ2≥σ3 • What would it look like for plane stress? From test results • For tension test 2cosφ σσ==Yf,0σ=,=0⇒Y= 12TT3 1s+ inφ • For compression test 2cosφ σσ=−Yf,0=σ= ,=0⇒ Y= 32CC1 1s− inφ •Get ⎛⎞ YYTT π −1 YT c ==φ −tan ⎜⎟ 22YYCC⎝⎠ Simpler treatment for plane stress • If both stresses are of the same sign, then we compare the corresponding Y. If they are of different signs • Check if the two formulations are the same! σ σ f = 1 −−3 1 YYTC Drucker-Prager yield criterion (Dan Drucker, 1918-2001, William Prager 1903-1980) • Generalization of Von Mises to account for hydrostatic pressure fI= α 12+−JK • Gets outer bound of Coulomb Moher with 2sinφ 6c cosφ α ==, K 33()−−sinφ 3()3 sinφ • Inner bound with 2sinφ 6c cosφ α ==, K 33()++sinφ 3()3 sinφ Pictorially Reading assignment Sections 4.6: Question: For what kind of beam cross-section there will not be much difference between the moment causing initial yield and the fully plastic moment? Source: www.library.veryhelpful.co.uk/ Page11.htm.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us