FACT SHEET OUR CURRENT KNOWLEDGE OF: Arctic and Antarctic - more differences than similarities? Globalisation and climate change have accompanied the example, in the activities of the Russian Federation in development of the world in recent decades. The polar its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)3,4. In March 2020, regions are also affected by climate change as well as by the Russian State Duma adopted economic objectives the internationalisation of politics and economy. In the in the Arctic region aimed at industrialisation and use following, a brief summary of the development of the of natural resources. China, too, is focusing its national two polar regions is given, and differences and similari- interests on the Arctic region, is conducting negotia- ties are presented. tions with Russia on the development of a Polar Silk Road, and hopes that the investment will bring econo- mic benefits5. What is the geopolitical framework of the polar re- gions? The forms of political control mechanisms in the polar regions experienced a considerable surge in develop- ment in the 20th century1. While the regulatory frame- work in the South Polar region was established by Figure above: map of minimum sea ice extent in the Arctic 15 the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, the North Polar region, September 2019 (left). For the sake of comparison, the respective as one of the hotspots of global warming, faces more long-term averages for the Arctic minimum sea ice extent in Sep- complex political power constellations1,2. The melt- tember (yellow) and the Arctic maximum sea ice extent in March ing of sea ice in Arctic waters provides new shipping (red) are also depicted. Map of maximum sea ice extent in the routes and access to previously untapped mineral, oil Antarctic 26 September 2919 (right). For the sake of comparison, and gas resources. Thus, climate change is bringing the the respective long-term averages for the Antarctic minimum sea Arctic into the focus of geostrategic interests of state ice extent in March (red) and the Antarctic maximum sea ice extent actors. The importance of the Arctic is reflected, for in September (yellow) are also depicted. Source: seaiceportal.de other member countries. Under this treaty, the Ant- arctic and the marine areas south of 60 degrees latitude are reserved exclusively for peaceful use and interna- tional cooperation, especially in the field of scientific re- search. All military activities and the disposal of radioac- tive waste are prohibited, and the assertion of national territorial claims is prohibited. Historically, the signing of the Antarctic Treaty dates back to the International Geophysical Year from 1957 to 19587. The cooperation between various countries in Antarctic research drove state actors to develop institutional arrangements for international political governance in the Southern Ocean region. The result was the establishment of the Scientific Committee for Antarctic Research (SCAR), which promotes research in the Antarctic region. Its Arc- tic counterpart, the International Arctic Science Com- mittee (IASC), was founded in 1990. Sea ice in the Arctic. (Photo: Stefan Hendricks/AWI) How relevant are the polar regions for security po- licy? The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea The north polar region is a subject of international poli- (UNCLOS) provides the legal basis for the resolution of tics and is of great importance in terms of security poli- territorial issues in the Arctic region and for the use of cy. The role of the Arctic in international security policy Arctic waters. The Convention, signed in 1982, is a mul- can be traced in historical events: During World War II, tilateral treaty and entered into force on 16 November the Norwegian town of Narvik was the scene of battles 19941,6. To date, 167 countries have ratified the treaty, for hegemony in the North Atlantic8. The security poli- but so far not the USA. UNCLOS divides the oceans, includ- cy dimension retained its relevance beyond the Second ing Arctic waters, into different marine zones in which ri- World War and was characterised by a bipolar order be- parian countries may exercise certain sovereign rights to tween the USA and the Soviet Union. The Arctic, as the a defined extent. shortest link between the USA and the Soviet Union, played a strategically important role in the deterrence The Arctic Council is the main intergovernmental forum tactics of the two powers during the Cold War. The Rus- for the Arctic. It comprises the eight riparian countries: sian Kola Peninsula was the stationing base for about Canada, the Kingdom of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Nor- 25 per cent of the Soviet nuclear arsenal, while the USA way, the Russian Federation, Sweden and the United expanded military bases in Greenland in the 1960s8. Af- States of America. The representative organisations ter the end of the East-West conflict, the significance of of the indigenous peoples are Permanent Participants. the Arctic shifted from a security policy arena to a place Non-riparian countries, governmental and non-govern- of multilateral cooperation9. To date, there is no multi- mental organisations may apply for observer status1. His- lateral body explicitly dealing with security policy in the torically, the creation of the Arctic Council can be traced Arctic. Although the risk of military conflict in the Arctic back to, among other things, the 1987 Murmansk speech is low, climate change in the region poses potential risks by Mikhail Gorbachev. His vision was that the Arctic re- of conflict10. gion should be maintained as a zone of peace for human- ity (more information in the fact sheets “Arctic Gover- In contrast, the Antarctic Treaty prevented the militari- nance” and “Arctic Council”)7. sation of Antarctica. In the mutual inspections anchored and regulated there, strict attention is paid to ensuring The legal framework for political activities of state and that no military activities take place at national Antarc- non-state actors in the Southern Ocean region is laid tic stations and infrastructures7. down by the Antarctic Treaty. The Treaty was signed on 1 December 1959 by Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Great Britain, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, the Soviet Union and the United States of America and entered into force on 23 June 19617,6. Germany is now a member of the Convention with 54 What is the situation of the Arctic indigenous peo- ples? „I look with scepticism at the The north polar region remains a central living space for polar region as a separate part indigenous peoples to this day. North of the Arctic Circle of the political order. In my opin- there is a population of about 400,000 indigenous peo- ion, the Arctic is a part of the ple, consisting of more than 30 different ethnic groups. international system that is in- Due to their settlement history going back thousands fluenced by three factors: the of years and their cultural identity in the Arctic, the indi- political system level, the geo- genous peoples are of great political importance. In the graphical conditions and the de- Arctic Council, the indigenous peoples organisations en- velopment of technology“ joy a special status as Permanent Participants1,11,9. Dr Rasmus Gjedssø Bertelsen / UiT The Arctic University of Norway. (Photo: Michael Morreau) Which socio-economic aspects are important in the polar regions? At the beginning of the 21st century, our world is shaped the Arctic states14. First of all, scientific studies should by the complex interdependencies of a globalised econ- provide clarity about the effects of fishing in the Arctic omy. In view of climate change, this also applies to the Ocean. polar regions. Both the northern and southern polar re- gions are targets of commercial interests of state actors In economic terms, the Southern Polar region differs and global corporations. According to estimates by the significantly from the Arctic. In the 18th and 19th cen- United States Geological Survey (USGS), 22 per cent of turies, whales and seals were hunted intensively until the as yet undiscovered oil and gas deposits are located stocks declined to the point where commercial use was north of the Arctic Circle6,12. no longer worthwhile. In order to prevent further over- exploitation of nature, separate international agree- New opportunities for access to Arctic resources mean ments were adopted under the umbrella of the Antarc- that the north polar region is increasingly attracting the tic Treaty. To protect Antarctic seals, the Convention attention of the riparian countries. The Russian Fed- for the Conservation of Antarctic seals was adopted in eration, Norway and Canada are investing heavily in 1972. The conservation of Antarctic marine living re- the development of the technical infrastructure for the sources is regulated by the “Convention on the Conser- extraction of raw material deposits5. In addition, due to vation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources”, founded in potential environmental impacts on polar ecosystems 1980, under which fishing quotas for krill and fish stocks in the Arctic, companies are increasingly coming under are established6. The International Whaling Commission public scrutiny, which is why oil and gas drilling projects adopted a moratorium on commercial whaling in 1987 are often withdrawn. and established whale sanctuaries in the Indian Ocean and the Southern Ocean. The Convention on the Regula- In addition to easier access to raw materials in Arctic tion of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities (CRAMRA)