DOCSLIB.ORG

The Third Branch, Fall 1999)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Third Branch, Fall 1999) TheThe ThirdThird BranchBranch A PUBLICATION OF THE WISCONSIN JUDICIARY Vol. 8, No. 4 www.courts.state.wi.us Fall 2000 State of the Judiciary Calls Upon Judges, Court Staff to be Leaders pilot project in Milwaukee County helps to collar defendants “In the day-to-day work…we might lose sight of our role as Awho skip their court appearances, ensuring that cases do not leaders on the bench and off the bench for fair and impartial justice, slip through the cracks. Two hundred miles away, in rural for access to the courts, for an effective and efficient system pro- Trempealeau County, an innovative program gives the courts more viding equal justice for all,” Abrahamson said. “As judicial leaders options for offenders sentenced to perform community service, and we must tell the people we serve about our strengths and acknowl- a better way to track their work. The program benefits the com- edge the shortcomings in the judicial system and try to correct munity and gets minor lawbreakers back on the right path. them. That’s the way to maintain public trust and confidence.” These programs and others like them are being developed in Abrahamson discussed what she called the five principles of judi- counties across the state. The common thread is the leadership of cial leadership: recognizing problems and identifying creative judges and court staff who see a problem and envision a solution. solutions; bringing together diverse groups to work towards a shared In her annual State of the Judiciary Address, Chief Justice Shirley vision; fostering collaboration among parties that must participate S. Abrahamson highlighted the achievements of judges and court in order for a program to work; turning words into action; and cel- staff who have enhanced court services through innovations at both ebrating success by sharing lessons learned so that innovations can the state and county level. She then challenged the audience of more be replicated. The toughest step for judges, she acknowledged, might than 200 judges and staff to become leaders in improving the be taking action in these administrative matters. administration of justice. continued on page 19 Lundsten Appointed to Court of Appeals Inside ssistant Employment, Consumer Protection, and AAttorney Criminal Appeals units. The vast majority of Public Trust & General Paul the approximately 400 cases he handled were Confidence Plan . 2 Lundsten, who criminal matters. From 1988 to 1999, he worked for the served on the governor’s Pardon Advisory Judicial Selection Department of Board, which advises Gov. Tommy Task Force . 3 Justice since Thompson on clemency applications from he graduated people convicted of crimes. Court Interpreting . 4 law school in He was the recipient of the 1992 “United 1983, has been States Supreme Court Best Brief Award” Court Improvement Judge Paul Lundsten appointed to from the National Association of Attorneys Program . 8 the Court of General for his work before the U.S. Appeals, District IV. He began in the new Supreme Court on Wisconsin v. Mitchell,a Legislative Update . 8 position on Nov. 6 and will seek election to hate crimes case. the post in April 2001. Lundsten was one of three finalists for State/Federal Grants He replaces Judge William Eich, who the appointment. The others were Maureen for Wisconsin . 10 retired effective Oct. 1 after serving 26 years McGlynn Flanagan, also an assistant attor- Retirements . 15 on the bench. ney general, and Paul W. Schwarzenbart, Within the Attorney General’s Office, with the law firm of Lee, Kilkelly, Paulson Lundsten worked in the Medicaid Fraud, & Younger. ❖ Action Plan on Public Trust and Confidence in the Wisconsin Justice System is Released n the left are the words of former litigants and jurors, former offenders and their families, and “Court personnel OWisconsin residents who par- several randomly selected individuals who may or may not have speak in monotone ticipated in a project to examine the had experience with the courts. They were asked questions about voices about matters state of public trust and confidence court process and environment, cost and access issues, race and severely critical to in the justice system. A plan recom- class bias concerns, and how the system could be improved. our lives, without mending actions to address issues Based on research as well as findings from the focus groups, the showing a great such as equal treatment, judicial committee’s action plan recommends strategies to improve public concern for involvement in the community, sat- confidence in the courts. The plans addresses five areas: the impact of isfaction with the juvenile justice • equal treatment in the justice system; their judgments.” system, and more was released at the • judicial/attorney involvement in the community; Wisconsin Judicial Conference • satisfaction with the juvenile justice system; “I would trust on Oct. 27. • Wisconsin courts “We have confirmed that we are empathy in the justice system; and more than any other doing some things very well. Most • selection and treatment of jurors. citizens, for example, are confident court system.” The steering committee also recommends convening a leader- that the Wisconsin justice system is ship forum in 2001 to bring together leaders of the judiciary, the free from overt bias and dishonesty,” organized bar, law enforcement, local government, and commu- “Police, and said Chief Judge Joseph M. Troy, nity groups to discuss strategies for carrying out the action plan. others in the system, chair of the Public Trust and “The responsibility for increasing trust and confidence in the should be more Confidence Steering Committee that judicial system,”Troy said,“rests most squarely with those of us who active in the com- developed the action plan. “It is work in the system.” ❖ munity. If they humbling, however, to learn of the came to community deep alienation felt by some citizens Public Trust & Confidence in the Justice System, The Wisconsin events, other than and to realize how ineffective we Initiative Action Plan is available on the Wisconsin court system Web during election time, have been in educating the public site at www.courts.state.wi.us, under “What’s New.” For more infor- I’d trust them about their system of justice.” mation, contact Executive Assistant to the Chief Justice John Voelker more.” The initiative began in response to at (608) 261-8297 or Trina E. Gray, public affairs coordinator for the a national conference and studies of State Bar of Wisconsin, at (608) 250-6025. “Our juvenile public confidence in the justice system doesn’t know system. Chief Justice Shirley S. what it’s supposed Abrahamson, Director of State to be doing. Does Courts J. Denis Moran, the State Bar The Wisconsin Initiative it punish? Does it of Wisconsin, and the Wisconsin rehabilitate? No League of Women Voters developed Steering Committee Members one knows.” Public Trust and Confidence in the Justice System: The Wisconsin Chief Justice and Director of State Courts Appointees Initiative, and each appointed mem- Chief Judge Joseph M. Troy, Outagamie County Circuit Court “The jury system is bers to the 10-person steering (chair) Judge Carl Ashley, Milwaukee County Circuit Court hard on people who committee (see sidebar) that was work. I am a solo Judge Patience D. Roggensack, Wisconsin Court of Appeals, charged with researching and identi- District IV veterinarian. I had fying issues concerning public trust Clerk of Circuit Court Claudia Singleton, Jackson County to arrange for and confidence, gathering input another vet to cover from public focus groups, and creat- State Bar of Wisconsin Appointees my clinic and I had ing a public trust and confidence Attorney Derek C. Mosley, assistant district attorney, Milwaukee County to pay him for the action plan. The study was funded by day so I could Attorney Eileen A. Hirsch, assistant state public defender, Appellate the American Bar Association and Division Office, Madison report for jury duty. the State Bar of Wisconsin. Attorney/Milwaukee County Supervisor Thomas A. Bailey, Bailey I ended up not After identifying 12 issues that Law Offices getting called— create barriers to public trust and but I still had to confidence, the committee arranged Wisconsin League of Women Voters Appointees Deb Augustyn, Fond du Lac County League of Women Voters pay for someone for five focus group studies to be held to cover my Melanie Ramey, Dane County League of Women Voters in Milwaukee (two), La Crosse (one), Attorney Cheryl Daniels, Dane County League of Women Voters business.” and Appleton (two). More than 50 people participated, including 2 THE THIRD BRANCH •FALL 2000 Judicial Selection Committee Prepares to Submit Report approximately half of those currently on the bench were initially appointed by the governor to fill a mid-term vacancy. This system has built a well-qualified, but not diverse, judiciary. To address this issue, the Legislature in the 1999-2001 budget bill created a nine-member Committee on Judicial Selection. It charged the committee with finding ways to increase the number of qual- ified minority candidates for judgeships. Specifically, the committee was asked to study judicial subdistricts and other methods of judge selection that would result in increased racial and ethnic diversity of the state’s judges. To determine where people of color are encountering detours, the committee is looking at the path between high school, college, law school, law practice, and the bench. It has examined research Professor Charles D. Clausen, Marquette University Law School, explains research on how selection methods change the diversity of the judiciary. Clausen suggesting that judicial selection methods do not alone explain the serves as research reporter for the Judicial Selection Committee, of which Judge lack of minority representation on the bench, and is exploring other Maxine A. White (seated next to Clausen) is chair.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New York State Attorney Emeritus Program Tenth Anniversary Celebration
    FEERICK CENTER FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE New York State Attorney Emeritus Program Tenth Anniversary Celebration December 2, 2019 1:00 PM – 5:00 PM Costantino Room This event is co-sponsored by Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP • Debevoise & Plimpton LLP • Latham & Watkins LLP • Proskauer Rose LLP • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom LLP The organizers and most especially Fordham Law School’s Feerick Center for Social Justice express their thanks to the co-sponsors for their generous support of this event. Ten Years of the New York State ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Attorney Emeritus Program The Feerick Center thanks all those who assisted in the planning of this event. The center is deeply grateful to members of the Attorney Emeritus Program Advisory Ten years ago, the New York State court system launched the Council for their input and suggestions in connection with the Attorney Emeritus Program (AEP Program or Program). New Tenth Anniversary Celebration. The center also thanks the York’s Chief Judge Janet DiFiore has enthusiastically endorsed AmeriCorps VISTA members, summer interns and legal fellows the AEP and she and her staff provide invaluable guidance who provided helpful support and assistance in planning the and support. Her predecessor, former Chief Judge Jonathan Celebration, including: Lippman, founded the Program as part of a robust, pioneering campaign to address the State’s justice gap. New York State Gabrielle Agostino – 2019 Summer Siena College Legal Fellow now leads the nation in the depth of its commitment to addressing the civil legal service needs of low- and moderate- Davina Mayo-Dunham – 2019 Summer Siena College Legal income people. Fellow Over the years, the AEP has evolved and expanded attributable Ellen McCormick – 2019-2020 Feerick Center Dean’s Fellow to the innovation and dedication of leaders in the judiciary, including the Honorable Fern A.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Judge Memorials and Profiles These Resources Are Available at the Utah State Law Library Unless Otherwise Indicated
    Utah Judge Memorials and Profiles These resources are available at the Utah State Law Library unless otherwise indicated Adams Kirsten Daniel, Retired Judge Says Regulations Mean Loss of Justice, Freedoms , Iron County Today (Oct. 12, 2011). Kenneth H. Adams, Parowan justice court. Includes photograph. Adkins Judicial Profile: Judge Robert Adkins , Bar & Bench 5 (Fall 2010). Third district court. Includes photograph. Allen Terry Welch, Profile of Judge John H. Allen , Utah B.J., Feb. 1992, at 13. Bankruptcy court, U.S. District of Utah. Includes photograph. Amy Macavinta, Drug Court Judge Takes it Personally, Box Elder News J. A1 (Aug. 26, 2009). Kevin Allen, first district court. Anderson Aldon J. Anderson: United States District Judge for the District of Utah (published on the Tenth Judicial Circuit Historical Society website: http://www.10thcircuithistory.org/judges_bios.htm) Geoff Liesik, Anderson Honored as "The Kind Judge," Retires After 17 Years on the Bench , Uintah Basin Standard (Sept. 1, 2009). John R. Anderson, eighth district court. Includes photograph. Recently Appointed Judges , 3 Off the Rec. 9 (Oct. 1992). John R. Anderson, eighth district court. Andrus New Judges , 5 Off the Rec. 12 (Dec. 1994). J. Mark Andrus, second district juvenile court. Armstrong In Memoriam: George G. Armstrong, July 16, 1868-January 24, 1944 , 14 Utah B. Bull. (Annual Meeting) 220 (1945). Third district court. Utah State Law Library || 450 S. State Street, Room W-13, Salt Lake City 801-238-7990 || http://www.utcourts.gov/lawlibrary || [email protected] Text: 801-432-0898 || Facebook: Utah State Law Library Utah Judge Memorials and Profiles Rev. August 2013 © Utah State Law Library Page 1 Ashton Clifford L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judicial Branch
    The Judicial Branch 150 The Judicial System 159 The Supreme Court 168 Other Courts and Commissions 173 Judicial Milestones 149 (Reviewed by editorial staff November 2013) The Judicial System B. K. Roberts* “The judicial power shall be vested in a supreme court, district courts of appeal, circuit courts and county courts. No other courts may be established by the state, any political subdivision or any municipality.” Article V, Section 1, Florida Constitution On March 14, 1972, the electors of Florida ap- rendered. We commonly say proved a revision of the judicial article of the State that the judicial power is the Constitution to give Florida one of the most mod- power to administer justice ern court systems in the nation. Section 1 of Article and that “equal justice under V provides that “The judicial power shall be vested law” is the supreme object of in a supreme court, district courts of appeal, circuit all courts that perform their courts and county courts. No other courts may be proper function. established by the state, any political subdivision or In those cases where the any municipality.” The revision eliminated 14 differ- Legislature may decide that, ent types of courts which had been created pursu- for matters of convenience or B. K. Roberts ant to the 1885 Constitution. Substituted for these for quicker or more efficient trial courts is a uniform (two appellate and two trial administration of a particular law, the determination courts) structure composed of the Supreme Court, of controversies arising under such law should be District Courts of Appeal, circuit courts, and county exercised, in the first instance, by a commission or courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpublished United States Court of Appeals for The
    Appeal: 13-1638 Doc: 33 Filed: 12/11/2013 Pg: 1 of 15 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1638 ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JANE DOE, Member of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board ("Board"), sued as individual of an unauthorized entity; JOHN DOE, Member of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board ("Board"), sued as individual of an unauthorized entity; CYNTHIA D. KINSER, sued as individual; DONALD W. LEMONS, sued as individual; S. BERNARD GOODWYN, sued as individual; LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR., sued as individual; WILLIAM C. MIMS, sued as individual; ELIZABETH A. MCCLANAHAN, sued as individual; CLEO E. POWELL, sued as individual; CHARLES S. RUSSELL, sued as individual; ELIZABETH B. LACY, sued as individual; LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, sued as individual; JANE DOE, Officer of the Virginia State Bar, sued as individual; JOHN DOE, Officer of the Virginia State Bar, sued as individual; KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, sued as individual; CATHERINE CROOKS HILL, sued as individual; JANE DOE, Officer/Member of the Virginia Employment Commission, sued as individual; JOHN DOE, Officer/Member of the Virginia Employment Commission, sued as individual; JOHN G. ROBERTS, Justice of the United States Supreme Court; WILLIAM K. SUTER, Justice of the United States Supreme Court; MEMBERS OF THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, sued as individuals; MEMBERS OF THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, sued as individuals; MEMBERS OF THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, sued as individuals; MEMBERS OF THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, sued as individuals; MEMBERS OF THE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Supreme Court's Recent Flood of CEQA Decisions
    practice tips BY CHRISTIAN L. MARSH The California Supreme Court’s Recent Flood of CEQA Decisions THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA),1 with its use of feasible alternatives or mitigation measures.10 mandate on public agencies to lessen or avoid the unwelcome envi- When the lead agency finds that the project will have a less-than- ronmental effects of proposed projects, has generated hundreds of law- significant effect on the environment, the agency may adopt a nega- suits in the state’s trial courts and intermediate appeals courts over tive declaration instead of preparing an EIR.11 CEQA and its imple- the statute’s 40-year history. Perhaps no other California law matches menting guidelines also provide a series of exceptions or exemptions CEQA in this respect. With so many lawsuits, commentators have from CEQA’s environmental review requirements.12 If any apply, noted wryly that it is not difficult to find a CEQA case standing for the lead agency need not prepare a negative declaration or an EIR. almost any proposition. Lead agencies and project proponents expend Once the agency approves the project, it may issue a notice that trig- untold millions each year defending or settling those suits and in pay- gers a short 30- or 35-day statute of limitations period.13 ing their opponent’s attorney’s fees when public interest plaintiffs pre- The state supreme court first grappled with CEQA just two years vail under the state’s private attorney general statute.2 Moreover, these after its enactment. Referring to the statute as “EQA” at the time, sums do not account for the enormous expenses arising from the delays Justice Stanley Mosk authored the decision in Friends of Mammoth that can ensue once a project is challenged in court.3 v.
    [Show full text]
  • Counterbalance
    national association of women judges counterbalance Volume 29 Issue 4 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Fourth Annual Meeting with Congressional Women's Caucus / 1 President’s Message / 2 Executive Director’s Message / 3 Memphis NAWJ Annual Conference / 5 Intimate Partner Violence and its Diversion from Courts / 8 District News / 12 International News / 19 Women in Prison / 22 Infi nity Project / 25 (L-R) NAWJ President La Tia W. Martin, Ambassador for Global Women's Issues Melanne Verveer, and Hon. Marjory D. Fields (Retired) Summer Academy / 26 Scholarships / 27 Fourth Annual Meeting of Congressional Caucus for Women’s Issues Atlanta Retrospective / 28 National Women Leaders of the Judiciary—A Wonderful Success!!! Further A’Field / 30 On the morning of July 15, 2009 NAWJ Presi- our political system are open and ready to continue dent La Tia W. Martin and Meeting Chair Judge the advancement of women. Juanita Bing Newton, Dean of the New York State Christina M. Tchen, Director of the White Judicial Institute, together with Rep. Janice Scha- House Offi ce of Public Engagement and Executive kowsky of Illinois and Rep. Mary Fallin of Okla- Director of the newly created White House Coun- homa, Co-Chairs of the 111th Congress’ Caucus cil of Women and Girls, offered a spirited charge for Women’s Issues, hosted a revelatory exchange to continue the pursuit of equality and justice for on pressing international and domestic challenges women. She also advised that the administration of for women and girls in the world today. Nearly President Barack Obama was interested in seeking 60 judges, representatives, lawyers, government outstanding women and minority candidates for offi cials and bipartisan congressional staff were various positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Justices of the Delaware Supreme Court in Support of Petitioner ______
    No. 19-309 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ___________ JOHN C. CARNEY, GOVERNOR OF DELAWARE, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. ADAMS, Respondent. ___________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ___________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE FORMER CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE DELAWARE SUPREME COURT IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ___________ VIRGINIA A. SEITZ* KATHLEEN MORIARTY MUELLER SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 736-8000 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae January 24, 2020 * Counsel of Record TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................. ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .......................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .............................. 3 ARGUMENT ......................................................... 6 I. OUR CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITION EMBRACES THE SELECTION OF JUDGES BASED ON PARTY AFFILIA- TION .............................................................. 6 II. DELAWARE’S CHOSEN JUDICIAL- SELECTION PROCESS IS CONSTITU- TIONAL ......................................................... 12 A. Delaware’s Judicial-Selection Process Is Within Its Authority As A Sovereign And Has Produced An Excellent Judiciary ..... 12 B. This Court’s Decisions In Elrod And Branti Confirm The Constitutionality Of Delaware’s Judicial-Selection Process ..... 16 CONCLUSION ..................................................... 20 (i) ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507 (1980) ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States, "Republican Party of Pennsylvania
    Cite as: 592 U. S. ____ (2020) 1 Statement of ALITO, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL. ON MOTION TO EXPEDITE CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI No. 20–542. Decided [October 28, 2020] The motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE BARRETT took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. Additional opinions may follow. Statement of JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE GORSUCH join. The Court’s handling of the important constitutional is- sue raised by this matter has needlessly created conditions that could lead to serious post-election problems. The Su- preme Court of Pennsylvania has issued a decree that squarely alters an important statutory provision enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature pursuant to its authority un- der the Constitution of the United States to make rules gov- erning the conduct of elections for federal office. See Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2; Bush v. Palm Beach County Can- vassing Bd., 531 U. S. 70, 76 (2000) (per curiam). In a law called Act 77, the legislature permitted all voters to cast their ballots by mail but unambiguously required that all mailed ballots be received by 8 p.m. on election day. 2019 Pa. Leg. Serv. Act 2019–77; see 25 Pa. Stat. Ann., Tit. 25, §§3146.6(c), 3150.16(c) (Purdon 2020). It also specified that if this provision was declared invalid, much of the rest of Act 77, including its liberalization of mail-in voting, would be void.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Branch, Spring 2007
    N O P Q R S O T ¢¡¤£¦¥¨§¤© ¤ ¤ ¤ ' A A' . D$EGF +1 1 +$1$1 2 ¦ ' % ' D$!GHIB 2 0 #$% &$' ( !" ' % KL D$JG* 2 1$2 -/. .,56.,.7&$8 ($ 9' ' )*,+ +0$132 4 1$13+: 2 +$1 # 0 M$MG< ($8 + ;<$' 8 ($% A ( 8 ' C8 ' % % ' +2 +>= 2@? + 0 +$1 03B B VXW7Y¤Z¤[¤\^]G_ `bac_dde_ f¤gihkj¤Y7W¤l¤[¤Y he Director of State Courts has introduced legislation deciding to include a county in the request for additional Tthat would create seven new circuit court judgeships. judgeships because financing of the courts remains a state- isconsin Judiciary Identical bills were introduced in both houses on June 1. The county partnership. The counties will be responsible for legislation is in response to the Judicial Needs Assessment paying additional expenses for courtrooms, court personnel, Study showing Wisconsin needs 18 additional judgeships to and supplies. maintain current service levels. No judgeships have been created in Wisconsin since The bill would establish new circuit court branches as of August 2000. There are currently 241 circuit court branches August 1, 2008 in six counties: Barron, Chippewa, Dodge, in the state. Green, Juneau, and St. Croix. It would also establish an The Director’s Office is working with the authors to a publication of the W additional circuit court branch in Monroe County as of facilitate public hearings on the bills, so that action can be August 1, 2010. taken by the Legislature in the next several months. U Senator Lena Taylor (D-Milwaukee) and Representative Garey Bies (R-Sister Bay) are the lead authors of the bills.
    [Show full text]
  • SJI Newsletter May 2019 | Volume 29, No
    SJI Newsletter May 2019 | Volume 29, No. 8 Civil Justice Initiative Pilot Project Releases Miami-Dade Evaluation In November 2016, the Circuit Civil Division of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida implemented the Civil Justice Initiative Pilot Project (CJIPP) to test the impact of Civil Case Management Teams (CCMTs) on civil case processing. CCMTs were envisioned as an essential component of civil justice reform in the report and recommendations of the CCJ Civil Justice Improvements Committee. With SJI support, the CJIPP created four CCMTs, each consisting of a judge, a case manager, a judicial assistant, and a bailiff. The CCMTs developed a standardized case management process to streamline administrative tasks, triage cases into appropriate case management pathways, and monitor case progress. The remaining 21 judges in the Circuit Civil Division continued to manage civil caseloads under traditional case processing practices and staffing assignments, providing a baseline for comparison. To assess the impact of CJIPP, the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) conducted an outcome evaluation that compared the outcomes of cases assigned to the CJIPP teams with those assigned to the non- CJIPP judges (baseline). The NCSC found that CJIPP cases closed at a significantly higher rate, and approximately five months earlier on average than baseline cases. Shortly after the initial launch of the pilot program, the CJIPP cases experienced a temporary increase in the number of court hearings and case management conferences as lawyers in the CJIPP cases requested modifications to case management orders, including continuances or extensions of time to complete litigation tasks; however, the frequency of these case events returned to normal levels within three months.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton Consul蛘䋨ng Poli蛘䋨cal Tidbits News Clips
    6/27/2016 June 17, 2016 ­ Political Tidbits Hamilton Consul拨ng Compiled by The Hamilton Consulting Group Poli拨cal Tidbits June 17, 2016 News Clips The 2016 election is formally underway in Wisconsin, as state candidate nomination papers have been certified and both major Politics national political parties have their presumptive nominees. Walker speaks out about falling poll numbers: Fox11, In this week's Tidbits, read about the results from the latest Marquette June 17, 2016. Law School Poll and check out our Elections 2016 Issue page where Trek president John Burke you can review all the candidates running for state office. Also in this writes political book, but week's Tidbits, read about the races in the 12th and 18th Senate has no plans to run for Districts, and the 50th and 96th Assembly Districts. office: Wisconsin State Journal, June 17, 2016. In other state news, Gov. Walker has narrowed down the field of Ryan: 'Not my plan' to Supreme Court candidates to five individuals. Also, in light of the rescind Trump Attorney General's recent opinion, the Department of Natural endorsement: Politico, Resources has made some changes to the high capacity well June 16, 2016. program, and reforms to Wisconsin's long­term care programs have Scott Walker says low poll stalled. You can read about all of this below. numbers don't reflect what he hears in listening If you wish to receive additional information about a topic addressed sessions: Capital Times, in Tidbits, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Hamilton June 15, 2016. Consulting Team.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cutting Edge
    M i d - Shores Home Builders Association, Inc. Celebrating 15 Years! 1998-2013 the Cutting Edge Volume 7, Issue 7 July 2016 Inside this issue: PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Membership 2 By Tom Heiberger, Christel & Heiberger Builders, Inc. Regulatory Alert 2 Hello Everyone, Tena to learn more about things happening. It sim- this opportunity. All Things Political 3 Well summer is in full ply means that Tena and Our next Mid-Shores Trap Shoot 4 swing and I pray that it is our Select committees treating you, your fami- event is the Trap Shoot Parade Ad Sales 6 are working diligently lies, and your businesses behind the scenes. on August 24. This one is Arenz Tribute 9 well. geared less toward busi- The Parade of Homes ness and more toward WBA GA 11 From the President's pro- committee continues fun. There's still time to spective, this tends to be their work on this year's enter your team, or per- a slower time of the year, Parade. The focus now haps become a sponsor. as the General Member- is filling ad space in our Please contact Tena or ship takes the summer Parade of Homes Book. Pam if you would like to off from meetings and We hope you might con- get involved with this even the BOD takes off in sider promoting your event in one way or an- July. But that doesn't business in this years other. mean that there aren't publication. Please call Tom Heiberger CALENDAR OF EVENTS: August 2 Trap Shoot Commit- MSHBA may Grow with the Surrender of the HBA of FC Charter tee Mtg.
    [Show full text]