DOCSLIB.ORG

4MOST Consortium Survey 1: the Milky Way Halo Low-Resolution Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4MOST Consortium Survey 1: the Milky Way Halo Low-Resolution Survey Surveys DOI: 10.18727/0722-6691/5120 4MOST Consortium Survey 1: The Milky Way Halo Low-Resolution Survey Amina Helmi 1 Scientific context thousand stars out to 30–60 kpc, includ- Mike Irwin 2 ing tangential velocities with errors Alis Deason 3 Halo stars in the Milky Way spend signifi- between 5 and 50 km s–1 depending on Eduardo Balbinot 1 cant amounts of time at large distances their apparent magnitudes. 4MOST will Vasily Belokurov 2 from the Galactic centre, hence their tra- push the radial velocities much further, Joss Bland-Hawthorn 4 jectories are sensitive to the mass distri- down to G ~ 20 magnitudes at 1–2 km s–1 Norbert Christlieb 5 bution of the dark matter halo. Our survey, accuracy. Our survey will also measure Maria-Rosa L. Cioni 6 the 4MOST Consortium Milky Way Halo line-of-sight velocities for stars at the tip Sofia Feltzing7 Low-Resolution Survey, is therefore key of the red giant branch up to a distance Eva K. Grebel 8 for measuring the full mass distribution of of 250 kpc, and the rarer carbon and Georges Kordopatis 9 the Milky Way. In conjunction with the other asymptotic giant branch stars to Else Starkenburg 6 more local Milky Way Halo High-Resolution 1 Mpc. Not only will the estimates of the Nicholas Walton 2 Survey, and the detailed surveys of the total mass of the Galaxy be much more C. Clare Worley 2 Milky Way disc and bulge carried out in precise, but also its 3D distribu tion the 4MOST MIlky Way Disc And BuLgE ( density and shape) will be within reach Low- and High-Resolution Surveys using various dynamical modelling 1 Kapteyn Instituut, Rijksunversiteit (4MIDABLE-LR and 4MIDABLE-HR), it techniques. Groningen, the Netherlands also aims to determine the complete 2 Institute of Astronomy, University of merger and assembly history of the Gal- Our survey will also detect faint stellar Cambridge, UK axy (see Christlieb et al., p. 26; Chiappini streams and any substructures in a com- 3 Department of Physics, Durham et al., p. 30 and Bensby et al., p. 35). bined abundance-kinematic space. University, UK In particular, the follow-up of thin streams 4 Sydney Institute for Astronomy, The Galactic halo contains large amounts will allow us to pin down the lumpiness University of Sydney, Australia of substructure at distances beyond of the dark matter halo and to constrain its 5 Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität 20 kpc, discovered with wide-field photo- nature (Erkal & Belokurov, 2016; Bonaca Heidelberg/Landessternwarte, Germany metric surveys more than 10 years ago et al., 2018). All of these measurements 6 Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (Belokurov et al., 2006). At these large will thus lead to strong constraints on (AIP), Germany distances, debris is more spatially coher- cosmological models. 7 Lund Observatory, Lund University, ent because the mixing timescales are Sweden long. With the release of the Gaia astro- A significant by-product of determining 8 Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität metric data in April 2018 and the availa- the metallicity distribution function across Heidelberg/Astronomisches Rechen- bility of 6D phase-space information, it the halo will be the discovery of extremely Institut, Germany has been demonstrated that the inner metal-poor stars, which will be the focus 9 Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Nice, halo is dominated by merger debris from of further, more detailed follow-up, most France a single object as large as the Small likely using facilities other than 4MOST. Magellanic Cloud at the time of accretion (Helmi et al., 2018; Belokurov et al., 2018). The goal of this survey is to study the Beyond our Galactic neighbourhood, the Specific scientific goals formation and evolution of the Milky chemical characterisation of which is the Way halo to deduce its assembly his- focus of the Milky Way High-Resolution The specific goals of our survey are: tory and the 3D distribution of mass in Survey (Christlieb et al, p.26), there is still – Determining the density profile, shape the Milky Way. The combination of multi- much to learn. To make significant pro- and characteristic parameters of the band photometry, Gaia proper motion gress and pin down the full merger his- dark matter halo of the Milky Way — and parallax data, and radial velocities tory of the Milky Way we require spectro- including testing alternative theories of and the metallicity and elemental abun- scopic data of distant halo stars over a gravity such as Modified Newtonian dances obtained from low-resolution large portion of the sky that can be com- Dynamics (MOND) — and possibly their spectra of halo giants with 4MOST, will bined with the parallax and proper motion evolution in time. yield an unprecedented characterisa- information from Gaia. – Measurement of the perturbations tion of the Milky Way halo and its inter- induced by clumps on the spatial and face with the thick disc. The survey Most current mass estimates of the kinematic properties of cold streams will produce a volume- and magnitude- Milky Way have relied on small numbers leading to constraints on the mass limited complete sample of giant stars of tracers, and hence are likely subject spectrum of perturbers and on the in the halo. It will cover at least 10 000 to bias given the substructures present in nature of dark matter. square degrees of high Galactic latitude, the halo. The existing data sets contain, – Quantifying the amount of kinematic and measure line-of-sight velocities at most, 150 objects beyond 50 kpc substructure as a function of distance with a precision of 1–2 km s–1 as well (dwarf galaxies, globular clusters, halo and location on the sky. This will allow as metallicities to within 0.2 dex. stars; see, for example, the review article the discovery of substructures, new by Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard, 2016). dwarf galaxies and other low surface Gaia will provide partial data for a few brightness objects, the characterisation The Messenger 175 – March 2019 23 Surveys Helmi A. et al., 4MOST Consortium Survey 1 24h 18 h 12h 6h 0h Figure 1. Input catalogue density distribution for 30° the goal survey area of the Milky Way Halo Low- Resolution Survey. The stars shown here have been extracted from Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia colla- boration et al., 2018) and satisfy the following crite- 0° ria: –10 < G + 5 log10(proper motion) < 10, paral- lax – 2sparallax < 0.2; 0.55 < G–GRP < 0.8 magnitudes, and 15 < G < 20 magnitudes. This leads to a sample of approximately 2 million objects satisfying the –30° declination range and |b| > 20 degrees, after pruning out 5- and 10-degree radius regions around the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds, respectively. –60° Detailed coordination with the 4MOST Consortium Magellanic Cloud Survey (see Cioni et al., p. 54) will be carried out to ensure a smooth transition 1752 962 targets Equatorial between the surveys, as well as refinement of the target selection criteria. Notice the Sagittarius streams and other halo over-densities in this version 1 10 100 1000 of the input catalogue for our survey. The goal sur - Object density (N/deg2) vey area is –80 < dec < +20 degrees, however, it should be noted that the baseline survey for 4MOST is between –70 < dec < +5 degrees, and hence targets outside this footprint are less likely to be of their properties and their relation to lar clusters. This magnitude range over- observed (see Guiglion et al., p. 17). the build-up of the halo. laps at the bright end with the Milky Way – Characterisation of the metallicity and Halo High-Resolution Survey, which not elemental abundance distribution only provides cross-checks on derived (mostly magnesium and iron) through- stellar properties, but also ensures full out the halo, and also of each of the linkage between local and distant halo individual structures discovered. This populations. Since the halo density is in the number of such streams and this will yield enhanced samples of objects low, a wide-field instrument like 4MOST impacts the determination of the mass with very low metallicities or peculiar is essential to cover a large area in a distribution in the halo (Sanderson et al., elemental abundances for more reasonable time. The depth of our survey 2015). detailed follow-up, complementing the is perfectly suited to the goals, and 4MOST Consortium Milky Way Halo matches exactly the depth reached with Radial velocity estimates will generally High-Resolution Survey (Christlieb et al., Gaia with useful proper motion informa- be obtained from a combination of the p. 26) which focuses on the halo near tion. The strongest constraints on the Mg b triplet (Mgb) and the near-infrared the Sun. Such samples should constrain mass distribution come from streams cov- Ca II triplet (CaT) regions, which both the properties and yields of the first ering large angles on the sky, again push- contain sets of strong absorption lines, generation of stars (Population III). ing for large area surveys. For stars with also easily detectable in stars with low – Characterisation of the stellar halo-thick higher signal-to-noise (S/N > 25 per Å) metallicity. The velocity precision has disc interface from overlap with the useful constraints on the a-element to be 1–2 km s–1 in order to measure the 4MIDABLE-LR survey (Chiappini et al., abundances ([a/Fe] with error ≤ 0.1 dex), mean velocity in a field to approximately p. 30) with the aim of jointly constraining will be obtained and these are very 500 m s–1, which promises excellent con- the temporal assembly and evolution of important to further aid subdividing and straints on the mass distribution in the the thick disc and inner halo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Two Stellar Components in the Halo of the Milky Way
    1 Two stellar components in the halo of the Milky Way Daniela Carollo1,2,3,5, Timothy C. Beers2,3, Young Sun Lee2,3, Masashi Chiba4, John E. Norris5 , Ronald Wilhelm6, Thirupathi Sivarani2,3, Brian Marsteller2,3, Jeffrey A. Munn7, Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones8, Paola Re Fiorentin8,9, & Donald G. York10,11 1INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, 10025 Pino Torinese, Italy, 2Department of Physics & Astronomy, Center for the Study of Cosmic Evolution, 3Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI 48824, USA, 4Astronomical Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan, 5Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Mount Stromlo Observatory, Cotter Road, Weston Australian Capital Territory 2611, Australia, 6Department of Physics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA, 7US Naval Observatory, P.O. Box 1149, Flagstaff, AZ 86002, USA, 8Max-Planck-Institute für Astronomy, Königstuhl 17, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany, 9Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana, Jadronska 19, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 10Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Center, 11The Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA The halo of the Milky Way provides unique elemental abundance and kinematic information on the first objects to form in the Universe, which can be used to tightly constrain models of galaxy formation and evolution. Although the halo was once considered a single component, evidence for is dichotomy has slowly emerged in recent years from inspection of small samples of halo objects. Here we show that the halo is indeed clearly divisible into two broadly overlapping structural components -- an inner and an outer halo – that exhibit different spatial density profiles, stellar orbits and stellar metallicities (abundances of elements heavier than helium).
    [Show full text]
  • An Outline of Stellar Astrophysics with Problems and Solutions
    An Outline of Stellar Astrophysics with Problems and Solutions Using Maple R and Mathematica R Robert Roseberry 2016 1 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Electromagnetic Radiation 7 2.1 Specific intensity, luminosity and flux density ............7 Problem 1: luminous flux (**) . .8 Problem 2: galaxy fluxes (*) . .8 Problem 3: radiative pressure (**) . .9 2.2 Magnitude ...................................9 Problem 4: magnitude (**) . 10 2.3 Colour ..................................... 11 Problem 5: Planck{Stefan-Boltzmann{Wien{colour (***) . 13 Problem 6: Planck graph (**) . 13 Problem 7: radio and visual luminosity and brightness (***) . 14 Problem 8: Sirius (*) . 15 2.4 Emission Mechanisms: Continuum Emission ............. 15 Problem 9: Orion (***) . 17 Problem 10: synchrotron (***) . 18 Problem 11: Crab (**) . 18 2.5 Emission Mechanisms: Line Emission ................. 19 Problem 12: line spectrum (*) . 20 2.6 Interference: Line Broadening, Scattering, and Zeeman splitting 21 Problem 13: natural broadening (**) . 21 Problem 14: Doppler broadening (*) . 22 Problem 15: Thomson Cross Section (**) . 23 Problem 16: Inverse Compton scattering (***) . 24 Problem 17: normal Zeeman splitting (**) . 25 3 Measuring Distance 26 3.1 Parallax .................................... 27 Problem 18: parallax (*) . 27 3.2 Doppler shifting ............................... 27 Problem 19: supernova distance (***) . 28 3.3 Spectroscopic parallax and Main Sequence fitting .......... 28 Problem 20: Main Sequence fitting (**) . 29 3.4 Standard candles ............................... 30 Video: supernova light curve . 30 Problem 21: Cepheid distance (*) . 30 3.5 Tully-Fisher relation ............................ 31 3.6 Lyman-break galaxies and the Hubble flow .............. 33 4 Transparent Gas: Interstellar Gas Clouds and the Atmospheres and Photospheres of Stars 35 2 4.1 Transfer equation and optical depth .................. 36 Problem 22: optical depth (**) . 37 4.2 Plane-parallel atmosphere, Eddington's approximation, and limb darkening ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Galactic Metal-Poor Halo E NCYCLOPEDIA of a STRONOMY and a STROPHYSICS
    Galactic Metal-Poor Halo E NCYCLOPEDIA OF A STRONOMY AND A STROPHYSICS Galactic Metal-Poor Halo Most of the gas, stars and clusters in our Milky Way Galaxy are distributed in its rotating, metal-rich, gas-rich and flattened disk and in the more slowly rotating, metal- rich and gas-poor bulge. The Galaxy’s halo is roughly spheroidal in shape, and extends, with decreasing density, out to distances comparable with those of the Magellanic Clouds and the dwarf spheroidal galaxies that have been collected around the Galaxy. Aside from its roughly spheroidal distribution, the most salient general properties of the halo are its low metallicity relative to the bulk of the Galaxy’s stars, its lack of a gaseous counterpart, unlike the Galactic disk, and its great age. The kinematics of the stellar halo is closely coupled to the spheroidal distribution. Solar neighborhood disk stars move at a speed of about 220 km s−1 toward a point in the plane ◦ and 90 from the Galactic center. Stars belonging to the spheroidal halo do not share such ordered motion, and thus appear to have ‘high velocities’ relative to the Sun. Their orbital energies are often comparable with those of the disk stars but they are directed differently, often on orbits that have a smaller component of rotation or angular Figure 1. The distribution of [Fe/H] values for globular clusters. momentum. Following the original description by Baade in 1944, the disk stars are often called POPULATION I while still used to measure R . The recognizability of globular the metal-poor halo stars belong to POPULATION II.
    [Show full text]
  • Compact Stars
    Compact Stars Lecture 12 Summary of the previous lecture I talked about neutron stars, their internel structure, the types of equation of state, and resulting maximum mass (Tolman-Openheimer-Volkoff limit) The neutron star EoS can be constrained if we know mass and/or radius of a star from observations Neutron stars exist in isolation, or are in binaries with MS stars, compact stars, including other NS. These binaries are final product of common evolution of the binary system, or may be a result of capture. Binary NS-NS merger leads to emission of gravitational waves, and also to the short gamma ray burst. The follow up may be observed as a ’kilonova’ due to radioactive decay of high-mass neutron-rich isotopes ejected from merger GRBs and cosmology In 1995, the 'Diamond Jubilee' debate was organized to present the issue of distance scale to GRBs It was a remainder of the famous debate in 1920 between Curtis and Shapley. Curtis argued that the Universe is composed of many galaxies like our own, identified as ``spiral nebulae". Shapley argued that these ``spiral nebulae" were just nearby gas clouds, and that the Universe was composed of only one big Galaxy. Now, Donald Lamb argued that the GRB sources were in the galactic halo while Bodhan Paczyński argued that they were at cosmological distances. B. Paczyński, M. Rees and D. Lamb GRBs and cosmology The GRBs should be easily detectable out to z=20 (Lamb & Reichart 2000). GRB 090429: z=9.4 The IR afterglows of long GRBs can be used as probes of very high z Universe, due to combined effects of cosmological dilation and decrease of intensity with time.
    [Show full text]
  • Dwarf Galaxies 1 Planck “Merger Tree” Hierarchical Structure Formation
    04.04.2019 Grebel: Dwarf Galaxies 1 Planck “Merger Tree” Hierarchical Structure Formation q Larger structures form q through successive Illustris q mergers of smaller simulation q structures. q If baryons are Time q involved: Observable q signatures of past merger q events may be retained. ➙ Dwarf galaxies as building blocks of massive galaxies. Potentially traceable; esp. in galactic halos. Fundamental scenario: q Surviving dwarfs: Fossils of galaxy formation q and evolution. Large structures form through numerous mergers of smaller ones. 04.04.2019 Grebel: Dwarf Galaxies 2 Satellite Disruption and Accretion Satellite disruption: q may lead to tidal q stripping (up to 90% q of the satellite’s original q stellar mass may be lost, q but remnant may survive), or q to complete disruption and q ultimately satellite accretion. Harding q More massive satellites experience Stellar tidal streams r r q higher dynamical friction dV M ρ V from different dwarf ∝ − r 3 galaxy accretion q and sink more rapidly. dt V events lead to ➙ Due to the mass-metallicity relation, expect a highly sub- q more metal-rich stars to end up at smaller radii. structured halo. 04.04.2019 € Grebel: Dwarf Galaxies Johnston 3 De Lucia & Helmi 2008; Cooper et al. 2010 accreted stars (ex situ) in-situ stars Stellar Halo Origins q Stellar halos composed in part of q accreted stars and in part of stars q formed in situ. Rodriguez- q Halos grow from “from inside out”. Gomez et al. 2016 q Wide variety of satellite accretion histories from smooth growth to discrete events.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter in the Galactic Halo Rotation Curve (I.E
    Dark matter in the Galactic Halo Rotation curve (i.e. the orbital velocity V of stars and gas as a function of distance to the Galactic Center r) of the disk of the Milky Way is measured: • for the inner Galaxy by looking at the Doppler shift of 21 cm emission from hydrogen • for the outer Galaxy by looking at the velocity of star clusters relative to the Sun. (details of these methods are given in Section 2.3 of Sparke & Gallagher…) Fact that V(r) ~ constant at large radius implies that the Galaxy contains more mass than just the visible stars and gas. Extra mass - the dark matter - normally assumed to reside in an extended, roughly spherical halo around the Galaxy. ASTR 3830: Spring 2004 Possibilities for dark matter include: • molecular hydrogen gas clouds baryonic dark • very low mass stars / brown dwarfs matter - made • stellar remnants: white dwarfs, (originally) from neutron stars, black holes ordinary gas • primordial black holes • elementary particles, probably - non-baryonic dark matter currently unknown The Milky Way halo probably contains some baryonic dark matter - brown dwarfs + stellar remnants accompanying the known population of low mass stars. This uncontroversial component of dark matter is not enough - is the remainder baryonic or non-baryonic? ASTR 3830: Spring 2004 On the largest scales (galaxy clusters and larger), strong evidence that the dark matter has to be non-baryonic: • Abundances of light elements (hydrogen, helium and lithium) formed in the Big Bang depend on how many baryons (protons + neutrons) there were. light element abundances + theory allow a measurement of the number of baryons • observations of dark matter in galaxy clusters suggest there is too much dark matter for it all to be baryons, must be largely non-baryonic.
    [Show full text]
  • On Wave Dark Matter, Shells in Elliptical Galaxies, and the Axioms of General Relativity
    On Wave Dark Matter, Shells in Elliptical Galaxies, and the Axioms of General Relativity Hubert L. Bray ∗ December 22, 2012 Abstract This paper is a sequel to the author’s paper entitled “On Dark Matter, Spiral Galaxies, and the Axioms of General Relativity” which explored a geometrically natural axiomatic definition for dark matter modeled by a scalar field satisfying the Einstein-Klein-Gordon wave equations which, after much calculation, was shown to be consistent with the observed spiral and barred spiral patterns in disk galaxies, as seen in Figures 3, 4, 5, 6. We give an update on where things stand on this “wave dark matter” model of dark matter (aka scalar field dark matter and boson stars), an interesting alternative to the WIMP model of dark matter, and discuss how it has the potential to help explain the long-observed interleaved shell patterns, also known as ripples, in the images of elliptical galaxies. In section 1, we begin with a discussion of dark matter and how the wave dark matter model com- pares with observations related to dark matter, particularly on the galactic scale. In section 2, we show explicitly how wave dark matter shells may occur in the wave dark matter model via approximate solu- tions to the Einstein-Klein-Gordon equations. How much these wave dark matter shells (as in Figure 2) might contribute to visible shells in elliptical galaxies (as in Figure 1) is an important open question. 1 Introduction What is dark matter? No one really knows exactly, in part because dark matter does not interact signif- icantly with light, making it invisible.
    [Show full text]
  • Subaru Telescope —History, Active/Adaptive Optics, Instruments, and Scientific Achievements—
    No. 7] Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B 97 (2021) 337 Review Subaru Telescope —History, active/adaptive optics, instruments, and scientific achievements— † By Masanori IYE*1, (Contributed by Masanori IYE, M.J.A.; Edited by Katsuhiko SATO, M.J.A.) Abstract: The Subaru Telescopea) is an 8.2 m optical/infrared telescope constructed during 1991–1999 and has been operational since 2000 on the summit area of Maunakea, Hawaii, by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ). This paper reviews the history, key engineering issues, and selected scientific achievements of the Subaru Telescope. The active optics for a thin primary mirror was the design backbone of the telescope to deliver a high-imaging performance. Adaptive optics with a laser-facility to generate an artificial guide-star improved the telescope vision to its diffraction limit by cancelling any atmospheric turbulence effect in real time. Various observational instruments, especially the wide-field camera, have enabled unique observational studies. Selected scientific topics include studies on cosmic reionization, weak/strong gravitational lensing, cosmological parameters, primordial black holes, the dynamical/chemical evolution/interactions of galaxies, neutron star mergers, supernovae, exoplanets, proto-planetary disks, and outliers of the solar system. The last described are operational statistics, plans and a note concerning the culture-and-science issues in Hawaii. Keywords: active optics, adaptive optics, telescope, instruments, cosmology, exoplanets largest telescope in Asia and the sixth largest in the 1. Prehistory world. Jun Jugaku first identified a star with excess 1.1. Okayama 188 cm telescope. In 1953, UV as an optical counterpart of the X-ray source Yusuke Hagiwara,1 director of the Tokyo Astronom- Sco X-1.1) Sco X-1 was an unknown X-ray source ical Observatory, the University of Tokyo, empha- found at that time by observations using an X-ray sized in a lecture the importance of building a modern collimator instrument invented by Minoru Oda.2, 2) large telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter in Galaxies E NCYCLOPEDIA of a STRONOMY and a STROPHYSICS
    Dark Matter in Galaxies E NCYCLOPEDIA OF A STRONOMY AND A STROPHYSICS Dark Matter in Galaxies Dark matter in spiral galaxies SPIRAL GALAXIES are flat rotating systems. The stars and gas in the disk are moving in nearly circular orbits, with the gravitational field of the galaxy providing the inward acceleration required for the circular motion. The rotation of these galaxies is usually not like a solid body: the angular velocity of the rotation typically decreases with radius. To a fair approximation, assuming Newtonian gravity, the rotational velocity V(r) at radius r is related to the total mass M(r) within radius r by the equation V 2(r) = GM(r)/r, where G is the gravitational constant. The radial variation of the rotational velocity (the rotation curve) is most readily measured from the gas in the disks. The emission lines of ionized gas in the inner regions are measured with optical spectrographs. With radio synthesis telescopes, rotation curves can be measured from the neutral hydrogen (H I) which emits a narrow spectral line at 1420 MHz (21 cm wavelength). The interest in measuring rotation curves of spiral galaxies is that they give a direct measure of the radial distribution of the total gravitating mass. Until the early 1970s, most of the rotation data for spirals came from optical observations which did not Figure 1. The upper panel shows the R-band radial surface extend beyond the luminous inner regions. At that time, brightness distribution of the spiral galaxy NGC 3198. The the optical rotation curves seemed consistent with the lower panel shows itsHIrotation curve (points).
    [Show full text]
  • The Milky Way Galaxy a Galaxy Is a Collection of Stellar and Interstellar Matter – Stars, Gas, Dust, Neutron Stars, Black Holes – Held Together by Gravity
    The Milky Way Galaxy A galaxy is a collection of stellar and interstellar matter – stars, gas, dust, neutron stars, black holes – held together by gravity. This is what we see if we look towards the Galactic center from our vantaggpe point on Earth. We live in the Milky Way Galaxy. Looking at other spiral galaxies gives us an idea of how our galaxy looks. Andromeda Galaxy – 3 million lyr 3 main parts of a spiral galaxy: •Galactic disk •GlGalact ic blbulge •Galactic halo In the 18th century William Herschel estimated the size and shape o f our ga laxy by s impl y counti ng st ars i n all di recti ons (assumed all stars are the same luminosity). Sun What didn’t Herschel know about? DUST! (+ all stars are NOT the same luminosity) More dust along the disk causes the distribution of stars to drop-off artificially – objects more than a few kpc away are hidden by all of the dust. Variable Stars -stars whose luminosityyg change with time because they are physically pulsating There are 2 types of Variable Stars: RR Lyrae Cepheid •All pulsate in the same way •Each pulsate somewhat •Periods 0.5 to 1 day differently •Periods range from 1 to 100 days • Variable stars are located on the “instability strip” in the HR diagram • The star is internally unstable • TtddiTemperature and radius vary in a regular way causing pulsations Cepheid variables are mostly hi gh -mass stars evolving across the top of the HR diagram RR Lyraes are lower mass horizontal branch stars There is a relationship between the pulsation period of a variable and its luminosity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Low Density and Magnetization of a Massive Galaxy Halo Exposed by a Fast Radio Burst
    The low density and magnetization of a massive galaxy halo exposed by a fast radio burst J. Xavier Prochaska1;2, Jean-Pierre Macquart3, Matthew McQuinn4, Sunil Simha1, Ryan M. Shannon5, Cherie K. Day5;6, Lachlan Marnoch6;7, Stuart Ryder7, Adam Deller5, Keith W. Bannister6, Shivani Bhandari6, Rongmon Bordoloi8, John Bunton6, Hyerin Cho9, Chris Flynn5, Elizabeth K. Mahony6, Chris Phillips6, Hao Qiu10, Nicolas Tejos11 1: University of California Observatories-Lick Observatory, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 2: Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-8583, Japan 3:International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, Curtin University, Bentley WA 6102, Australia 4: Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 5: Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn VIC 3122, Australia 6: Commonwealth Science and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia Telescope National Facility, P.O. Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710 Australia 7: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia 8: North Carolina State University, Department of Physics, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202, USA 9: School of Physics and Chemistry, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, 61005, Korea 10: Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 11: Instituto de F´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Catolica´ de Valpara´ıso, Casilla 4059, Valpara´ıso, Chile ∗To whom correspondence should be addressed; E-mail: [email protected]. 1 Present-day galaxies are surrounded by cool and enriched halo gas extending to hundreds of kiloparsecs. This halo gas is thought to be the dominant reser- voir of material available to fuel future star formation, but direct constraints on its mass and physical properties have been difficult to obtain.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Stellar Ages & the History of the Milky
    Measuring Stellar Ages & the History of the Milky Way An Astro 2010 White Paper Contact Author: Kevin R. Covey1 ([email protected]) Co-Authors: Timothy C. Beers2, John J. Bochanski3, Saurav Dhital4, Zeljko Ivezic5, Mario Juric6, Jason Kalirai7, Sebastien Lepine8, Eric Mamajek9, Peregrine McGehee10, Soren Meibom1, Knut Olsen11, Abhijit Saha11, Ata Sarajedini12, Keivan Stassun4, Benjamin Williams5, Peter Yoachim13 Affiliations: 1 - CfA; 2 - Michigan State Univ.; 3 - MIT; 4 - Vanderbilt Univ.; 5 - Univ. of Washington; 6 - Institute for Advanced Studies; 7 - STScI; 8 - AMNH; 9 - Univ. of Rochester; 10 - IPAC; 11 - NOAO; 12 - Univ. of Florida; 13 - Univ. of Texas Galaxy Model courtesy A. West 1 Motivation Robust stellar age measurements, and the star formation histories (SFHs) they enable us to derive, are powerful tools for understanding galaxy formation. Theoretical simulations show that galaxy mergers and interactions produce sub–structures of stars sharing a single age and coherent spatial, kinematic, and chemical properties1,2. The nature of these sub– structures place strong constraints on models of structure formation in a Λ–CDM universe3. The Milky Way Galaxy and its satellites are unique laboratories for studying these Galac- tic sub–structures. Detailed catalogs of stars in the Milky Way provide access to low–level substructures that cannot be detected in more distant galaxies; the Magellanic clouds pro- vide a similar sensitivity advantage over other environments amenable to global surveys for sub–structures and SFHs. Photometric and spectroscopic surveys have identified numerous spatial–kinematic–chemical substructures: the Sag. dwarf, Pal 5’s tidal tails, the Monoceros Ring, etc4,5,6,7,8.
    [Show full text]