Annual Traffic Report 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Traffic Report 2020 /Annual Traffic Report 2020 Air Traffic Statistics Living ideas - Connecting lives /Contents 3 Traffic results 2020 at a glance 4 Traffic trends at Munich Airport in 2020 and development 1992 – 2020 6 Aircraft movements 2020 9 Passengers 2020 12 Air freight and air mail 2020 15 Traffic records since 1949 18 Appendix Traffic results 2020 at a glance 3 /Traffic results 2020 at a glance Commercial Scheduled / traffic charter traffic Total aircraft movements 140,480 130,622 -65.5 % -67.0 % 146,833 -64.8 % 6,353 Non-commercial -33.3 % traffic Commercial Scheduled / traffic charter traffic Total passengers 11.11 Mio. 11.09 Mio. -76.8 % -76.8 % 11.1 Mio. -76.8 % 7,451 Non-commercial -59.8 % traffic Air freight turnover 145,113 t -56.2 % Traffic results 2020 at a glance 4 /Traffic trends at Munich Airport in 2020 2020 – Travel restrictions lead to a historic decrease of traffic volumes January 27th, 2020 marked the date of the first confirmed with a large domestic market such as the United States, COVID-19 infection in Germany. Following this, a growing China, India, and Brazil – were able to perform much better. number of counteractive measures initially intended to slow the spread of the disease were implemented in line with the rising number of cases. Eventually, this led to Germany’s first Top 10 Airports in Europe 2020 – Passengers (in m): lockdown on March 23rd, 2020. ISTANBUL-IST 23.3 The restrictions that were issued during the Corona PARIS-CDG 22.3 pandemic caused a significant decrease of passenger LON DON -LHR 22.1 volumes and aircraft movements even before the lockdown AMSTERDAM 20.9 commenced. The first ten weeks of 2020 indicated a fairly MOSCOW-SVO 19.8 inconspicuous development and eventually made up for FRANKFURT about 62 % of the full year traffic. However, since the plentiful 18.8 travel restrictions have never been fully lifted and even a MADRID 17.1 second lockdown was commenced towards the end of the ISTANBUL-SAW 17.0 year, traffic was unable to recover throughout the year. MOSCOW-DME 16.4 BARCELON A 12.7 Source: Airports Council International Munich was outperformed by its European and worldwide peers Owed to the multitude of severe travel restrictions, Munich Seat load factors and average aircraft size declined Airport was unable to develop in line with other European Continuously changing travel restrictions alienated airports (commercial traffic only) – and, as a consequence, passengers and led to a poor demand, as reflected in a dropped out of the Top 10 of the busiest airports in Europe. sharply declining load factor, which dropped by 17.6 pp to After ranking 9th in the previous year, Munich will end up in just 59.6 %. Similarly, the average number of seats per flight 12th place in 2020, according to preliminary data. Only in decreased by 10 down to 148, as did the number of terms of movements Munich remained within the Top 10. In passengers per flight, which decreased by 34 down to just 88. the global comparison, Munich Airport lost out significantly. Owed to the massive reduction in long-haul flights (-69 %) While almost all airports worldwide noted massive losses, and the switch to smaller aircraft, the average maximum these were usually much less pronounced outside of Europe. take-off mass (MTOM) declined by 5 tons to 83 tons. While long-haul traffic was down to a bare skeleton scheduled everywhere, many countries – particularly those Passengers Passengers Developmentair of tr Aircraft movements Air freight and air mail incl. transit (in 1,000 tons) 1,000 (in transit incl. mail air and freight Air 100 200 300 400 500 600 10 20 30 40 50 100 200 300 400 0 0 0 1992 12.0 57 1992 192 1992 26 1993 12.7 – 1993 192 65 millions) (in traffic commercial 1993 30 Air Air freight 1994 13.5 72 mail 1994 200 1994 31 1995 14.9 71 1995 214 – 1995 36 1996 15.7 1,000) (in traffic total 83 1996 233 1996 35 104 1997 17.9 1997 268 1997 28 affic at Munich Airport 1992 104 1998 19.3 1998 278 1998 23 123 1999 21.3 1999 299 1999 23 133 2000 23.1 2000 319 2000 23 135 2001 23.6 2001 338 2001 23 2002 23.2 166 2002 344 2002 22 2003 24.2 2003 156 2003 356 22 177 2004 26.8 2004 21 2004 383 209 2005 28.6 2005 15 2005 399 232 2006 30.8 2006 14 2006 411 258 2007 34.0 2007 15 2007 432 257 2008 34.5 2008 18 2008 432 - 229 2009 32.7 2020 2009 13 2009 397 Traffic trends at Munich Airport in 290 2010 34.7 2010 12 2010 390 303 2011 37.8 2011 17 2011 410 287 2012 38.4 2012 18 2012 398 285 2013 38.7 2013 18 2013 382 305 2014 18 2014 39.7 2014 377 338 2015 19 2015 41.0 2015 380 356 2016 19 2016 42.3 2016 394 and2019 development 1992 373 2017 16 2017 44.6 2017 405 358 2018 17 2018 46.3 2018 414 339 2019 18 2019 47.9 2019 417 153 2020 6 2020 11.1 2020 147 - - 2020 5 /Aircraft movements 2020 7 Movements – development 2020 8 Aircraft movements 2020 at German airports Aircraft movements 2020 7 / Movements - development 2020 Pandemic-related reduction of 64.8 % Aircraft movements at 1980s level of 147,000 As seen with passenger volumes, intercontinental traffic was Similar to passenger volumes, aircraft movements collapsed worst affected; the segment shrank by 69 % to a total of from mid-March onwards. The relative loss, however, is 10,591 flights. Continental traffic recorded 92,115 flights slightly less dramatic, as smaller aircraft were increasingly (-65 %). The domestic segment noted a total of 44,127 utilized. In addition, an increase in full freighter flights was arrivals and departures (-54 %). noted, which had a positive impact on the total number of flights. Weekly movements2020 to2019 (scheduled / charter) 2019 2020 8,000 6,000 Corona crisis 4,000 Movements 2,000 0 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 Calendar weeks 2020 If allowed, people are travelling Whenever restrictions were eased, demand and traffic In the second half of the year, the development of passenger increased notably and instantly (see the example of the numbers correlated strongly with the designation of Canary Islands below, which have been declared a risk area international risk areas and respective travel restrictions. several times). PassengerstoCanary Islands (departing passengers scheduled / charter traffic; moving weekly values) 2019-beginning of 2020 2020-beginning of 2021 8,000 Introduction of Cancellationof travel restrictions travel restrictions 6,000 4,000 Passengers 2,000 0 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 2 4 11 Calendar weeks 2020/2021 Aircraft movements 2020 8 Aircraft movements 2020 at major German airports Hamburg 66,337 -57.3 % Bremen 20,173 Berlin (total) -44.4 % 105,309 -63.6 % Hanover 43,613 Dresden Dusseldorf -43.2 % Leipzig / Halle 15,153 -47.0% 78,804 64,483 -65.1% -18.4 % Cologne / Bonn 78,867 -44.6 % Frankfurt 212,235 German airports -58.7% Nuremberg (total) 30,056 -51.1 % 1.1 m Stuttgart -54.9 % 58,803 Munich 146,833 -58.7 % -64.8 % /Passengers 2020 10 Passengers – development 2020 11 Passengers 2020 at German airports Passengers 2020 11 Passengers 2020 at major German airports Hamburg 4.6 m -73.6 % Bremen 0.6 m Berlin (total) -74.2 % 9.1 m -74.5% Hanover 1.5 m Dresden Dusseldorf -77.0 % Leipzig / Halle 0.4 m 6.6 m 0.5 m -76.0 % -74.2 % -79.7 % Cologne / Bonn 3.1 m -75.1 % Frankfurt 18.8 m German airports -73.4 % Nuremberg (total) 0.9 m -77.7 % 63 m Stuttgart -74.6 % Munich 3.2 m 11.1 m -74.8 % -76.8 % /Air freight and air mail 2020 13 Air freight and air mail – development 2020 14 Cargo 2020 at German airports Air freight and air mail 2020 13 /Air freight and air mail 2020 Moderate declines in air freight compared with passenger volumes and aircraft movements Decline of commercial freight (loaded and unloaded) by 56.2 % to 145,000 tons Shares of belly freight and pure freighters in As a result of the collapsed intercontinental network, the 2020 compared to 2019 belly freight – transported in the hold of passenger aircraft – was disproportionately affected and shrank by 66.8 % down to 94,680 tons. The demand for air freight, however, remained high. Consequentially, the volume of air freight 35 % transported on full freighter aircraft grew by 9.2 % to 50,253 tons, but was not able to compensate for the losses, as the 2020 total capacity offered remained insufficient to match 65 % demand. The changes in traffic structures caused by the manifold restrictions led to a major shift in the relation between belly freight and full freighter freight. Owed to the aftermath of various COVID-related restrictions, there is a massive excess Belly freight Pure freighter demand for air freight, resulting in higher freight rates and the curious phenomenon of passenger aircraft being utilized as full freighters. This enabled the provision of the population and the economy with essential goods, and the share of pure freighters on the total air freight handled increased markedly 14 % (see illustration on the right).
Recommended publications
  • Perspectives Annual Report 2011 Introduction Company Profile and Strategy Service Portfolio Communication and Social Responsibility
    Annual Report 2011 Report Annual Perspectives Annual Report 2011 Introduction Company profile and strategy Service portfolio Communication and social responsibility Perspectives. We are an airport operator. We run a major piece of aviation infrastructure – part of an international, interconnected transport network that sustains global mobility and unites people across national boundaries. We are also a responsible corporate citizen who seeks an open, fair and balanced dialogue with stake - holders and interest groups and for whom the long-term protec- tion of the environment, climate and natural resources is para- mount. As such, we pursue a forward-looking business strategy intended to strike a successful balance between business, envi- ronmental and social objectives. We provide our dedicated work- force with the training and continuing education they need to be their best; we offer attractive, long-term employment; and we deliver valuable economic and labor-market stimulus with a reach far beyond the bounds of our airport. Our goal: to create value – for our customers, employees, owners and host region. Workforce and work environment Environmental and climate protection Financial review Sustainable development Motivation Munich Airport is a key hub for domestic German and international air traffic. Our de- sire as the airport’s operating company is to unite the world’s people, markets and con- tinents. People – our passengers, business partners, employees and neighbors – are the main motivating force behind everything we do. They drive and inspire us to be our best. Economy Environment Social equity Introduction Company profile and strategy Service portfolio Communication and social responsibility Perspectives 2011 Motivation Markets Message Economy Our goal is to sharpen our cus- tomer focus and enhance the appeal of the products and services we offer air travelers and visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Das »Münchner Modell« – Vorbild Für Die Ganze Branche
    / Aircraft Noise and Aircraft Noise Abatement The environment at Munich Airport Living ideas – Connecting lives D2 Contents 4 Munich Airport in comparison 8 Causes of noise 11 Noise research 14 Air traffic basics 16 Planning flight procedures 18 Aircraft noise monitoring 22 Reducing aircraft noise 32 Legal requirements 35 Appendix 36 Glossary 38 Imprint D3 Foreword Air traffic is a major factor in societal development. It helps to secure Germany's economic place in the face of international competition and has immense signifi- cance in times of increasing globalization. It makes a substantial contribution not only to exports, but also to the needs of the population in terms of mobility and well-being. Air traffic also means noise, however. The subject of aircraft noise and complete protection for residents is a chief con- cern for Munich Airport in dialog with the neighborhood. We, together with the air- lines and air traffic control, have for many years been actively engaged in all areas of noise abatement in order to take account of the local residents’ need for rest. Aircraft noise must also be considered and assessed against traffic noise as a whole. The figures show air traffic as a whole to cause the least traffic noise by far, and no other mode of transport has achieved as much success in reducing noise through technological innovations over the past decades as air traffic. We want to find the right balance based on the legal situation between the in- terests of residents and the environment and the requirements of industry and people’s needs for mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Classification Based on Cargo Characteristics Robert
    Airport Classification based on Cargo Characteristics Robert Mayer* *Centre for Air Transport Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0TR, UK Tel.: +44 (0)1234 754971, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Air cargo has received little attention in airport research. In this paper, 114 airports are grouped according to their cargo business characteristics. Applying a hierarchical cluster analysis, the paper uses absolute (cargo tonnage) and relative measures (share of cargo work load units, of freighter movements and of international cargo) to establish the reliance of different airport types and groupings on air cargo. Eight distinct clusters are identified which show clear differences in the characteristics of the sample with regards to cargo activities. Geographic patterns of these airports are also revealed. For example, North American and European airports are characterised by features unique to these regions. Airports that are highly dependent on air cargo tend to benefit from a central location within networks of cargo airlines, while other airports with high cargo volumes generate these as a result of significant belly-capacity of passenger operations. Understanding the heterogeneity of cargo airports is important for future benchmarking studies in this field. 1 Introduction Airports fulfil a vital function in the air transport system by providing key infrastructure to the industry. Traditionally their (physical) output is measured by passenger numbers, aircraft movements and cargo tonnage (Graham, 2005) but also non-aeronautical service outputs (Oum and Yu, 2004). Airports Council International (ACI) identify five measures of airports’ core activities; namely, passengers, origination and destination passengers, aircraft movements, freight or mail loaded/unloaded, and destinations (nonstop) (ACI, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Guide.Indd
    /Airport Guide Munich Airport at a glance Living ideas – Connecting lives /Airport world of experiences Access to/from A92 Deggendorf expressway and Erding 41 Terminal 1 Nord Nordallee 1 5 F 41 A Süd Hotel 52 Access to/from General 2 26 35 A92 München-Deggendorf Hotel Aviation expressway and Freising Zentralallee Visitors Park B Terminal 1 Terminal 2 T2 satellite Terminal G Südallee MAC K, L H C 81 Access to Terminal 1 27 Wartungsallee 3 7 Access to Terminal 2 for meeters and greeters 80 D 20 West 80 Access to Terminal 2 for parkers Ost Foothpath Cargo Terminal 4 8 E 25 Welcome to our 5-Star-Airport. Munich Airport Excellent service Airport world of Munich Airport is more than «just» an airport – it experiences offers you the best connections to anywhere in www.munich- the world – and much more besides ... is a city with everything that cities need. For ex- airport.com/air- ample, in the two terminals and in the MAC, you will port-experience find travel markets, hairdressers, children’s play areas, a medical center, sleep cabins, free WIFI etc. Terminal 1 and the München Airport Center Rapid transit rail Terminal 1 is divided into Departures/Arrivals A–D for connections From duty free to top labels 150 shops every 10 minutes and F as well as Arrivals E. All facilities for passen- A day spent shopping at Munich Airport is always www.munich- between Munich airport.com/ ger handling are located on level 04 (street level). city center and an experience. Here no wishes are left to be shopping the Airport on desired, because you will find around 150 shops You can also reach the München Airport Center lines S1 and S8 and boutiques in an area measuring over 43,000 (MAC) and the parking areas quickly and easily square meters.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Infrastructure Project Planning in Germany: the Case of the BER Airport in Berlin-Brandenburg
    Large Infrastructure Projects in Germany Between Ambition and Realities Working Paper 3 Public Infrastructure Project Planning in Germany: The Case of the BER Airport in Berlin-Brandenburg Registration I will attend: By Jobst Fiedler and Alexander Wendler This working paper is part of the research project by the Hertie School of Governance Name on Large Infrastructure Projects in Germany – Between Ambition and Realities. For further information:Position www.hertie-school.org/infrastructure The study was made possible by theInstitution friendly support of the Karl Schlecht Foundation Email Hertie School of Governance | May 2015 Accompanied by Contents 1. Introduction………………………………………………………….... 1 1.1 High-profile failure in large infrastructure projects…………………... 1 1.2 Research Question and Limitations………………………………….. 3 1.3 Hypothesis…………………………………………………………….... 4 1.4 Methods of Inquiry and Sources…………………………………….... 6 2. Megaprojects and their Inherent Problems………………………. 8 2.1 Large-scale Infrastructure Projects – an Introduction………………. 8 2.2 Empirical Performance of Large-scale Infrastructure Projects…….. 8 2.3 Drivers of Project Performance……………………………………….. 9 2.3.1 National Research Council (US Department of Energy) …………... 9 2.3.2 Miller and Lessard (IMEC Study) …………………………………….. 10 2.3.3 Flyvbjerg et al…………………………………………………………... 11 2.3.4 Mott MacDonald………………………………………………………... 14 2.3.5 Institute for Government / 2012 London Olympics………………….. 15 2.3.6 Eggers and O’Leary (If We Can Put A Man On The Moon) ………… 17 2.4 Analytical Framework for Review of BER Project…………………… 18 3. The BER Project………………………………………………………. 20 3.1 Background: The Long Road Towards a New Airport in Berlin…….. 20 3.2 BER Governance and Project Set-Up………………………………... 21 3.2.1 Against better knowledge: failure to appoint a general contractor and consequences for risk allocation………………………………… 21 3.2.2 Project Supervision and Control: deficiencies in structure and expertise levels………………………………………………………… 26 3.2.3 Financing and the Role of Banks……………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Information Munich Airport from a to Z
    /Information Munich Airport from A to Z Living ideas – Connecting lives Contents 1 Contents Overview 2 Overview plan of the airport 4 Terminal 1 and München Airport Center (MAC) 6 Terminal 2 8 Terminal 2 satellite Service at the airport 10 Service Centers 11 Service from A to Z 28 Service for passengers with disabilities 30 Cafés, bars and restaurants 34 Hotels 35 »municon« conference center 36 Travel market 37 Airlines 38 Visitors Park Transport links 40 Road network 41 Parking 42 Rapid transit rail (S-Bahn) 44 Bus connections 46 Transfer services 2 Overview 3 /Overview plan of the airport Access to/from A92 Deggendorf expressway and Erding 41 Terminal 1 Nord Nordallee 1 5 F 41 A Süd Hotel 52 Access to/from General 2 26 35 A92 München-Deggendorf Hotel Aviation expressway and Freising Zentralallee Visitors Park B Terminal 1 Terminal 2 T2 satellite Terminal G Südallee MAC H C 81 Access to Terminal 1 27 Wartungsallee 3 7 Access to Terminal 2 for meeters and greeters 80 D 20 West 80 Access to Terminal 2 for parkers Ost Foothpath Cargo Terminal 4 8 E 25 Terminal 1 Rail services (S-Bahn) T1 consists of the departure/arrival areas (A–D and Parking The rapid transit rail lines S1 and S8 alternately Internet F) plus an arrival-only area (E). All facilities for han- P1–P5, P7, P8 and serve the stops »Besucherpark« (Visitors Park) and www.munich- dling passengers are located at level 04 (street level). P20 in the direct »Flughafen München« (Munich Airport) about every airport.de vicinity of the Passengers and terminals ten minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonised Annual KPI Report 2020 Download
    KPI Annual Report 2020 German Harmonisation Annual KPI Report 2020 Version History: Version Date Remark Author 0.1 14.06.21 Initial Draft Barboff 0.5 21.06.21 Conclusions added, general edits Editorial Board 0.8 16.07.21 Editorial review Editorial Board 0.9 21.07.21 Final edits & review Barboff 1.0 03.08.21 Version for Publication Editorial Board 1.1 05.08.21 List of Abbreviations added Barboff Annual KPI Report Page 2 of 29 German Harmonisation Annual KPI Report 2020 Imprint Publisher: DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH on behalf of German Harmonisation Initiative A-CDM Germany Am DFS-Campus 10 D-63225 Langen GERMANY Contacts: Erik Sinz & Sebastian Barboff, OZ/AA Airspace & Aerodrome Operations Editorial Board: Sebastian Barboff DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH Am DFS-Campus 10 D-63225 Langen GERMANY Boris Breug Flughafen München GmbH D-85326 München-Flughafen GERMANY Stefan Hilger Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide D-60547 Frankfurt am Main GERMANY Nico Ruwe Flughafen Stuttgart GmbH Flughafenstraße 32 D-70629 Stuttgart GERMANY Date: 05 August 2021 Pages: 29 All rights reserved. Any use outside of the limits set by the German Urheberrechtsgesetz requires written permission of the publisher. Violations will be prosecuted in civil and criminal court. This includes copying, translating, microfiching, and storing and processing in electronic systems. DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH 2021 Annual KPI Report Page 3 of 29 German Harmonisation Annual KPI Report 2020 Content 1 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 5 2 GERMAN HARMONISATION INITIATIVE A-CDM
    [Show full text]
  • Getting from Munich Airport (Terminal 1) to Regensburg
    Akademisches Auslandsamt/ International Office Getting from Munich Airport (Terminal 1) to Regensburg [If you arrive at Terminal 2 (Lufthansa, StarAlliance), follow the signs to Terminal 1. Then continue towards the “Z” area and follow the instructions below, starting with nr. 4.] 1. Once you have gotten your luggage & have passed through Customs, you will leave that area into a major concourse heading left & right. You will enter this concourse by going around a high Plexiglas wall. This long concourse has windows almost entirely along the far side from where you entered. 2. Information booths are available up & down this concourse. Look for stairs, or an escalator ramp, or an elevator down to the next lower lever. 3. Continue along this concourse toward the large Z (Zentralbereich, or Central Area) - this is an open area collection of shops, services, cafeterias, etc. The entrance-ways into the Zentralbereich go off down ramp at 45o angles. 4. Once in the Zentralbereich, you will find a cafeteria, restrooms, upscale shops, a blue & white Bavarian souvenir shop, money changing counters, and Die Bahn (German rail) counter. Buy your ticket to Regensburg here. Get a one-way ticket (Einfach nach Regensburg, nicht Zurűck) to Regensburg. Æ costs: approximately 20 Euros 5. You will first be taking a very short bus trip to the little town of Freising, and then taking the train from there to Regensburg. So, go outside to the bus turn-around lot next to the Zentralbereich and scope out which stop is for Freising/Regensburg. For years it has been the first one closest to the entrance doors, but check for yourself.
    [Show full text]
  • Attending Companies
    Warsaw, Poland | 15 –17 October 2019 Building Capacity for the Future ATTENDING COMPANIES 15below American Airlines Civil Aviation Authority of Poland 7DNI ANA Aeroportos de Portugal Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of Serbia 7Skies Inc. Arup Cluj Avram Iancu International Airport Abbit Assaia International AG Collins Aerospace ACI World Atkins Copenhagen Airports ADB Safegate Australian Department of Agriculture Cranfield University ADP Ingénierie Avery Dennison Cubo Media GmbH AENA Aviatica Custom SpA Aeroports de Montreal Aviation Consulting DARP Aerotrax Technologies Azul Brazilian Airlines Delta Air Lines Agencja Informacyjna Polonia Bags ID Deutsche Lufthansa AG Air Black Box Bangalore International Airport Ltd. Dnata Air Canada BBC World News Dziennik Gazeta Prawna Airbus Bechtel Limited Eastern Airports Co., Ltd. Aircraft Interiors Expo Branding.aero & nóesis analysis labs eBagCheck.com Airport Services Association (ASA) Business Insider Polska El Al Israel Airlines Ltd. AIRportal.hu CAAC Embraer Airports Council International Canadian Air Transport Security Authority Emirates Group Alaska Airlines Cathay Pacific Airways i-Bangla Limited Aligned Research Group Centralny Port Komunikacyjny Ernst & Young All Nippon Airways China Southern Airlines eSky Group Amadeus Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport Etihad Airways EY ICF International LS Airport Services Finnair ICF Next Lufthansa Fly4free.pl Idemia LUXAIR Foster + Partners Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada Lyngsoe Systems Fraport AG Indoorway
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Connectivity of Arlanda Airport
    Cristina Mestre Rodriguez Development of the connectivity of Arlanda Airport Degree Project in Built Environment TSC-BT 15-006 Department Transport Science Division of Transport planning, Economy and Engineering Stockholm, Sweden 2015 0 ABSTRACT This thesis analyzes the current transport situation of Arlanda Airport and the two main cities that Arlanda is located between, Stockholm and Uppsala. The purpose of the thesis is to study the efficiency of the different transport alternatives and also to relate it with their current market shares. Besides, in order to do a deeper analysis of Arlanda Airport connectivity some of the busiest airports transport links have been analyzed in terms of availability of different transport alternatives, distance to the city centers and market shares. Because of the high number of cars that currently go to Arlanda, there is a need to reduce the emissions of carbon dioxide. To this end, a prediction of the demand in ten years has been carried out to see what improvements have to be done to make Arlanda a more environmentally friendly airport. The methodology used in order to forecast the demand has been based on a survey conducted at a single point to regular users of the public transportation system. The improvement of the connectivity of Arlanda Airport via public transport alternatives will not only affect the distribution of the current market shares, but also represents a key strategy for pursuing Arlanda’s leadership in achieving environmental goals. Key words: connectivity, accessibility, airport link, demand, market share, Arlanda Airport, public transport, environment. 1 FOREWORD This thesis is the result of the research work I carried out during the last semester of my university studies in order to achieve the degree in Civil Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Lufthansa Hires More Than 4,000 New Employees in the New Year
    You are here: News & Releases > Lufthansa hires more than 4,000 new employees in the New Year Lufthansa hires more than 4,000 new employees in the New Year 01.01.16 • 2,800 flight attendants wanted at various locations. • Eurowings and Austrian Airlines are hiring 240 pilots. • More jobs for ground staff and trainees with airlines and Lufthansa Group service companies. The Lufthansa Group is hiring more than 4,000 new employees in 2016, giving the organization a top position amongst the leading German companies. “We are proud that yet again this year the companies of the Lufthansa Group are able to offer many people an exciting new outlook and attractive working conditions in the aviation industry. For many applicants the Lufthansa Group is a dream employer. We are therefore even more pleased that we can fulfill this dream for 4,000 people,” says Carsten Spohr, Chairman of the Executive Board of Deutsche Lufthansa AG. Flight Attendants The main focus of the new recruiting will be the flight attendant training. In 2016 approximately 2,800 flight attendants will be hired in various locations and for different airlines of the Lufthansa Group: Lufthansa 1,400 (800 in Frankfurt and 600 in Munich) SWISS 800 (in Zurich) Eurowings 360 (in Vienna, Düsseldorf and Hamburg) Austrian Airlines 200 (in Vienna) Lufthansa CityLine 30 (in Munich) Interested parties can find more information at the following link: https://www.be-lufthansa.com/en/jobs-and-apprenticeship/flight-attendant-mf/ Lufthansa Flight Attendants Lufthansa flight attendants will start in the Frankfurt and Munich hubs on short, medium and long- haul destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Avialliance Key Facts 2019
    COMPANY PROFILE HIGHLIGHTS OF 2019 KEY FACTS AIRPORT FACTS AND FIGURES 2019 2 AIRPORT AWARDS 2019 Routes Europe Marketing Awards 2019 Overall winner and in the 4- 20 million passenger category: winner Budapest Airport Winner in the over 20 million passenger category: Athens International Airport Skytrax World Airport Awards 2019 in Eastern Best Airport Europe in a for the sixth time row: Budapest Airport World Routes Marketing Awards 2019 Highly commended in the category of 20 - 50 million passengers: Athens International Airport 3 Foreword Dear Readers, To mitigate the economic burdens, we have implemented numerous measures at AviAlliance and at the airports to­ For AviAlliance and the airports in which we have a stake, gether with the respective co­shareholders and airport man­ 2019 was another successful year. All five airports in our port­ agements. In collaboration with the airports, AviAlliance is folio recorded growth in passenger numbers. At San Juan also concentrating on the resumption of flight operations Airport the passenger total rose by 13 percent to 9.4 million, while maintaining the strictest health and safety standards. the airports in Athens and Düsseldorf both broke their prev­ The airports are taking all necessary steps to implement ious records with over 25 million passengers, while Budapest soc ial distancing and hygiene measures in order to guaran tee Airport was able to welcome more than 16 million passengers the utmost safety. for the first time in its history. At Hamburg Airport the number of passengers increased slightly to 17.3 million. We are confident that the aviation industry will recover, even though this time it will most likely take a little longer than in But then, in spring 2020, the corona pandemic turned almost the past.
    [Show full text]