C. Description of Services (C.1, C.1.1) Neustar Will Perform the Required Services As Prime Contractor
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Privacy Policy V1.1
CENTRALNIC LTD REGISTRY PRIVACY POLICY Version 1.1 September 2018 CentralNic Ltd 35-39 Moorgate London EC2R 6AR Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... 2 AMENDMENT ISSUE SHEET ................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 4 DATA PROTECTION RIGHTS ................................................................................................................. 5 RELATIONSHIP WITH REGISTRARS ......................................................................................................... 6 WHAT INFORMATION CENTRALNIC COLLECTS .......................................................................................... 6 INFORMATION CENTRALNIC DOES NOT COLLECT ....................................................................................... 8 HOW INFORMATION IS STORED ............................................................................................................ 8 HOW WE USE INFORMATION ............................................................................................................... 8 HOW INFORMATION IS PROTECTED ..................................................................................................... 13 HOW INFORMATION IS DELETED ........................................................................................................ -
View Annual Report
VERISIGN.COM worldwide UNITED STATES: AUSTRALIA: Corporate Headquarters Level 5, 6-10 O’Connell Street 487 East Middlefield Road Sydney, New South Wales, 2000 Mountain View, CA 94043 Australia USA Phone: +612-9236-0509 Phone: +1-650-961-7500 Fax: +612-9236-0532 Fax: +1-650-961-7300 www.VeriSign.com.au www.VeriSign.com INDIA: 21345 Ridgetop Circle VeriSign Services India Pvt Ltd., Dulles, VA 20166 80 Feet Road Koramangala Phone: +1-703-948-3200 Koramangala, Bangalore - 560 034 Karnataka, 2008 EUROPE: India 8 Chemin de Blandonnet Phone: +91-80-42565656 annual CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva www.VeriSign.in Switzerland SOUTH AFRICA: Phone: +41-22-545-0200 report Tygerberg Hills Office Park Fax: +41-22-545-0300 163 Hendrik Verwoerd Drive annual report www.VeriSign.ch Plattekloof 7500 Waterfront, Chancellors Road South Africa Hammersmith, W6 9XR London Phone: +27-21-937-8900 United Kingdom Fax: +27-21-937-8965 Phone: +44-(0)-1784-89-5014 www.thawte.com Fax: +44-(0)-1784-89-5114 www.VeriSign.co.uk JAPAN: Nittobo Bldg. 13F 8-1 Yaesu, 2-chome, Chuo-ku Tokyo 104-0028 Japan Phone: +81-3-3271-7011 Fax: +81-3-3271-7027 www.VeriSign.co.jp VERISIGN.COM ® 08 Cert no. SCS-COC-00648 board of directors executive officers investor info ® D. James Bidzos D. James Bidzos Quarterly earnings releases, corporate Executive Chairman of the Board Executive Chairman of the Board news releases, and Securities and Exchange and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer Commission filings are available by on an interim basis, on an interim basis contacting VeriSign Investor Relations or VeriSign, Inc. -
Content Governance
GUIDE FOR CONTENT GOVERNANCE Improve your content quality, your operational efficiency and protect the value of your brand 3 Content Introduction 5 Crucial challenges and opportunities 9 The purpose of content governance 15 The scale of content governance 17 Developing a content governance framework 19 Step 1 Choose your governance model 21 Step 2 Assess your current situation 23 Step 3 Define the work processes and roles 27 Step 4 Determine the policies and standards 37 Step 5 Set the Key Performance Indicators 41 Step 6 Automate 45 Content governance checklist 47 INTRODUCTION 5 Discover why content governance is essential to your organisation Content is important. As a company or organisation, you create and publish content to add character to your brand, to train your employees, to attract applicants or investors and to inform journalists or the general public. You use content in different ways, involving many people inside and outside the organisation. It is becoming increasingly clear that content is no longer a question of top-down publishing, but involves conversation and commitment. Today, marketers and communication managers even use content channels to build a community. They have apps, websites, Facebook, blogs, e-books, webinars, serious games, mash-ups, podcasts, virtual learning, content curation, crowdsourcing, online video and a wide range of traditional print channels. In order to maintain a certain level of control in the ever more complex world of content, publishing, conversation, channels and technology, you need content governance. Content governance has become an indispensable tool to protect and strengthen the value of your brand and improve the operational efficiency and quality of your content. -
Draft 7-17-11 an EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS of FAIR USE
Draft 7-17-11 AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF FAIR USE DECISIONS UNDER THE UNIFORM DOMAIN-NAME DISPUTE-RESOLUTION POLICY David A. Simon INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 1 I. THE UDRP AND ITS PROBLEMS ............................................................................................................... 7 II. METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................... 12 A. Sample Selection: Method of Selection .......................................................................................... 13 B. Types of Cases Selected for Sample............................................................................................... 14 III. FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................ 17 A. U.S. Respondents Win Twice as Many Fair Use Cases as Other Respondents ............................. 17 B. U.S. Law Dominates UDRP Decisions .......................................................................................... 21 C. U.S. Panels Decide Mostly Cases Involving U.S. Respondents ..................................................... 23 IV. IMPLICATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 25 A. Explaining U.S. Favoritism -
Opensrs Contract Fax Cover Sheet for .Us Reseller Agreement______
OpenSRS Contract Fax Cover Sheet for .us Reseller Agreement_____________ Please use this as your cover page when you fax in your OpenSRS contract. Before faxing the contract to OpenSRS, please be sure that you have: Signed up to be an OpenSRS Reseller at: https://horizon.opensrs.net/~vpop/subscribe/ Completely reviewed the contract, providing all necessary information, namely: Date and company information on Page 2 Address and contact information on Page 13 Signature and date on Page 13 Please provide the information below: Company Name:__________________________________________________ Web site URL:http://________________________________________________ OpenSRS Username:*______________________________________________ *obtained after you’ve signed up online Please fax only pages 2 and 13 of the .us OpenSRS contract to: +1 416-531-2516 Thanks, Team OpenSRS Page 1 Tucows Inc. .us RSP v1.1 REGISTRATION SERVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENT This Agreement (the "Agreement") is dated as of ("Effective Date") by and between: TUCOWS Inc. ("TUCOWS") and (*) ("RSP") (TUCOWS and RSP may be referred to individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties") WHEREAS, TUCOWS is authorized to provide domain name registration services for second-level domain names within the .us top-level domain; WHEREAS, RSP intends to establish the right to initiate the registration of .us domain names through OpenSRS (as defined below); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, benefits and covenants contained herein, TUCOWS and RSP, intending to be -
I Wish to Thank the United States Department of Commerce's
Comments from Danny Younger Introduction: I wish to thank the United States Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration for this opportunity to comment on the continuation of the transition of the technical coordination and management of the Internet’s domain name and addressing system to the private sector. As a member of the public that has had the honor of serving as an elected Chair of the General Assembly of the Domain Name Supporting Organization of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, I sincerely appreciate your posting of a Notice of Inquiry and wish to share with you my thoughts on the transition process as an individual that has tracked ICANN-related matters on a regular basis for the last six years. It has been said that “ICANN may not be the world’s most unpopular organization, but if it had consciously set out to make itself loathed it could hardly have been more successful.”1 I share that assessment. ICANN, the organization selected to embody the principles set forth in the White Paper2 is almost universally reviled. From my vantage point as a long-time ICANN participant, I have come to conclude that this passionate loathing has a single root cause: we detest ICANN because it has not remained true to the White Paper’s noble vision – rather than striving to become an organization committed to private, bottom-up coordination operating for the benefit of the Internet community as a whole, ICANN has chosen instead to focus its attention exclusively upon that select stakeholder community that feeds its coffers – it has become primarily a registry-registrar Guild Manager. -
Equinix Solution Neustar
EQUINIX SOLUTION NEUSTAR A Global Best Practice for Online Success. Equinix and Neustar Deliver High-Performance Global Platform for Managed Services. “With Neustar offering its DNS and monitoring service combined with Equinix’s industry leading network neutral colocation and interconnection facilities, we provide the world’s best DNS routing and application monitoring services to create a seamless IT fabric that covers the globe.” Alex Tulchinsky, SVP Shared Services, Neustar Performance Failure is Not an Option Consider the impact of poor network performance: Companies deploying mission and market critical online applications and websites are recognizing they can optimize their performance • Google now includes a website’s speed in its search ranking and availability by migrating from algorithms and writes that “Faster sites create happy users and a single-homed, single-site we’ve seen in our internal studies that when a site responds 1 deployment to a globally slowly, visitors spend less time there.” distributed model. This brief • In a joint experiment, Google and Bing concluded that “Delays discusses the reasons for this under half a second impact business metrics.”2 move and key best practices for success. • Amazon.com found that every 100-ms increase in the page load time decreased sales by 1 percent.3 • AOL has demonstrated that slower page speeds reduce page views per visit.4 • Wikia demonstrated that exit rates—the percentage of users leaving a site from a given page—drop as pages get faster.5 • After a year-long performance -
Detailed Technical Specifications
Annex No.1 Technical Specifications Conceptual, functional and technical requirements for elaboration of the new eu4ungheni.md & eu4cahul.md websites 1. Background The EU4Moldova: focal regions Programme (further Programme) is based on the European Commission Implementing Decision on the Annual Action Programme 2018 in favor of the Republic of Moldova and is funded by the European Union and implemented by the United Nations Development Programme. The overall objective of the five-year Programme is to strengthen the economic, territorial and social cohesion in the Republic of Moldova through smart, green, inclusive, sustainable and integrated local socio-economic growth as well as by improving the standards of living of the citizens in the focal regions: Cahul and Ungheni. The current document is defining the technical specifications for developing of the new versions of the existing www.eu4ungheni.md and www.eu4cahul.md websites. Both websites were developed at the launch Programme phase and need to be upgraded in order to be more interactive, mobile and user-friendly as well as re- engineering of the websites management systems. The future websites should serve as: • Main communication, visibility, and source of information on Programme activity; • Interactive platforms for promotion of the interaction and collaboration among citizens, public sector, private sector and civil society organizations. 2. Already developed websites current state Considering the necessity of content migration requirements below are described the important -
ONLINE MARKETING SERVICES the Following Additional Terms and Conditions Shall Apply to Any and All Purchases of Online Marketin
ONLINE MARKETING SERVICES The following additional terms and conditions shall apply to any and all purchases of Online Marketing Services, SEO Optimizer, Local Business Listings or nsMarketing™ Services (as defined below). 1. Description of Service. A. Web.com may make available for purchase, from time to time, a variety of online marketing services in the form of our nsMarketing™ solution, Local Business Listings, and/or SEO Optimizer product, including online banner advertisement creation and publication, pay per click search engine advertising, email communication tools, registration with several World Wide Web search engines and Internet Yellow Pages Directories (as described on our Website), search engine optimization, link building, search submissions, keyword optimization, local, regional and national directory listing and submission, Website and site map analysis, call-tracking, search engine optimized press release service, search engine visibility and/or premium listings services (collectively, "Online Marketing Services", "nsMarketing" or "Services"), as published on the Web.com Website. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement (which includes this and all other applicable Schedules) and during the term of this Agreement, Web.com agrees to provide to you the Online Marketing Services you purchase during the sign-up process. Web.com reserves the right to amend its Online Marketing Services offerings and to add, delete, suspend or modify the terms and conditions of such Online Marketing Services, at any time and from time to time, and to determine whether and when any such changes apply to both existing and future customers. B. In order to use the Services, you must obtain access to the Internet/World Wide Web, either directly or through devices that access Web-based content, and pay any service fees associated with such access. -
Outcomes Report of the GNSO Ad Hoc Group on Domain Tasting
GNSO Outcomes Report on Domain Tasting Doc. No.: Date: 2007/02/04 4 October, 2007 OUTCOMES REPORT OF THE GNSO AD HOC GROUP ON DOMAIN NAME TASTING 4 October 2007 Group Chair: Mike Rodenbaugh ICANN Staff: Olof Nordling, Patrick Jones STATUS OF THIS DOCUMENT This is the final version of the Outcomes Report from the GNSO ad hoc group on Domain Name Tasting, submitted to the GNSO Council on 4 October, 2007. GNSO Outcomes Report on Domain Tasting v1.6 Authors: Mike Rodenbaugh, [email protected] , Olof Nordling, [email protected] , Patrick Jones, [email protected], Page 1 of 144 GNSO Outcomes Report on Domain Tasting Doc. No.: Date: 2007/02/04 4 October, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 2 OBJECTIVE 5 3 BACKGROUND 7 4 OUTCOMES 10 5 NEXT STEPS 32 ANNEX 1 - SUBSCRIBERS TO THE DT LIST 33 ANNEX 2 - RFI RESPONSES 34 ANNEX 3 - EXPERIENCES FROM CCTLDS 97 ANNEX 4 - COMMENTS FROM UDRP PROVIDERS 104 ANNEX 5 – IPC CONSTITUENCY SUPPLEMENTAL RFI116 ANNEX 6 – REQUEST TO VERISIGN 144 GNSO Outcomes Report on Domain Tasting v1.6 Authors: Mike Rodenbaugh, [email protected] , Olof Nordling, [email protected] , Patrick Jones, [email protected], Page 2 of 144 GNSO Outcomes Report on Domain Tasting Doc. No.: Date: 2007/02/04 4 October, 2007 1 Executive summary 1.1 Background Following a request from the At-Large Advisory Committee in spring 2007, the GNSO Council called for an Issues Report on Domain Tasting from ICANN Staff in May 2007. This Issues Report, available at http://gnso.icann.org/issues/domain- tasting/gnso-domain-tasting-report-14jun07.pdf was discussed at the ICANN San Juan meeting, where the GNSO Council on 27 June 2007 (minutes at http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-27jun07.shtml) resolved to establish an ad hoc group for further fact-finding on the practice of domain tasting. -
Brief of Internet Commerce Association
No. 19-46 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. BOOKING.COM B.V., Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF THE INTERNET COMMERCE ASSOCIATION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT Megan L. Brown Counsel of Record David E. Weslow Ari S. Meltzer Jeremy J. Broggi WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 719-7000 [email protected] February 19, 2020 Counsel for Amicus Curiae - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES .......................... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............................1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .....................................3 ARGUMENT ...............................................................7 I. The Government Seeks A Bright-Line Rule That Would Devalue Registered Domain Names As A Class Of Intellectual Property Assets. ...............................................................7 II. The Government’s Rule Would Discourage Investment In The Internet Economy By Precluding Trademark Protection For New Types of Domain Names. ............................... 13 III. The Government’s Rule Would Eliminate A Critical Consumer Protection And Anti-Fraud Tool, Opening The Door To More Domain Name Abuse. ................................................... 15 A. Cybercriminals Abuse Domain Names Through Typosquatting And Domain Name Hijacking To Perpetrate Fraud And Proliferate Malware. .................... 16 B. Companies Rely On Trademark Protection To Combat Domain Name Abuse. ................................................... 20 C. Non-Trademark Remedies Do Not Provide A Sufficient Means For Combatting Domain Name Abuse. ..... 26 CONCLUSION .......................................................... 28 - ii - TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Central Source LLC v. annaulcreditreports.com, No. 20-CV-84 (E.D. Va.) ....................................... 23 Central Source LLC v. aabbualcreditreport.com, No. 14-CV-918 (E.D. -
The Secondary Market for Domain Names”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No
Please cite this paper as: OECD (2006-04-12), “The Secondary Market for Domain Names”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 111, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/231550251200 OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 111 The Secondary Market for Domain Names OECD Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)9/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 12-Apr-2006 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)9/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies THE SECONDARY MARKET FOR DOMAIN NAMES English - Or. English JT03207431 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI/ICCP(2005)9/FINAL FOREWORD This report was presented to the Working Party on Telecommunications and Information Services Policies (TISP) in December 2005 and was declassified by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policies (ICCP) in March 2006. This report was prepared by Ms. Karine Perset, with the participation of Mr. Dimitri Ypsilanti, both of the OECD's Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. This report is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. 2 DSTI/ICCP(2005)9/FINAL © OECD/OCDE 2006 3 DSTI/ICCP(2005)9/FINAL