Three Different Takes on ISIS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Three Different Takes on ISIS public relations’—and even more insidiously ‘Politics has to be murky, relying on because MPs, like most people, instinctively compromise and deals, because different and strike up a rapport with outsiders from simi- rival interests, truths and traditions exist lar backgrounds to themselves. It is a point under a common rule,’ she writes. ‘To which merits wider discussion and analysis. renounce politics is to destroy the very thing These anthropologist’s observations are that orders pluralism in non-violent ways enjoyable and insightful: Crewe has a great and keeps despotism at bay.’ eye for humanity and humour, and writes (very) engagingly. But alone they Juliette Jowit writes for The Guardian would not sustain a book, let alone an academic one. As she writes of her experiences, though, Three different takes on ISIS the tone shifts, progressively, from observa- tion to something more heartfelt: a defence Gilbert Achcar of the House of Commons, and of demo- cratic politics itself. Not only does Crewe The Rise of Islamic State: ISIS and the New believe that most MPs belie their (un)popu- Sunni Revolution, by Patrick Cockburn. lar image by being hard-working, sacrificing Verso. 172 pp. £9.99. privacy, family time, respect and (often) Isis: Inside the Army of Terror, by Michael income, to genuinely want to ‘do good’; she Weiss and Hassan Hassan. Regan Arts. 270 also argues that public expectations are pp. £12.99. unreasonable—even dangerous. Politics is by ISIS: The State of Terror, by Jessica Stern and nature about compromise, she observes: J. M. Berger. William Collins. 385 pp. £14.99. indeed, the contradictions necessary to do this are inherent in most if not all of our Most people prefer to keep referring to the lives. So politicians have to at once be con- self-proclaimed Islamic State by the acronym sidering individual constituents, their con- of its previous name: ISIS, the Islamic State stituency as a whole and the national good, in Iraq and Syria (or, more accurately ‘al- as well as special interests and their own Sham’—Greater Syria—approximately translated consciences; they must also be aware of his- by some as ‘the Levant’, with the acronym tory, act in the present and be mindful of the hence turned into ISIL). On this thus-named future consequences of their actions. To ISIS, close to forty books and counting have expect them to follow one path unswerv- been hitherto published in English, of which ingly would be to ask them to betray many the three reviewed here are the best-selling others whom they are elected to serve. A in the UK. good example is individuals and groups lob- Of these, Patrick Cockburn’s was one of bying MPs both ways on voting to legalise the very first books written on ISIS. It came gay marriage, while some also had strong out in 2014 under the title The Jihadis Return. personal views, often informed by their reli- The one reviewed here is an updated edition gion and/or views on individual liberty. with a new title. It recapitulates the views Sometimes Crewe’s defence stretches the that the author developed in his coverage of credulity of even someone like myself, events in Iraq and Syria for The Independent. whose experience has made them so much It is written in a most readable journalistic more respectful of MPs: she quotes a Labour style by an author who is well acquainted backbencher saying that they can ‘say “I with this part of the world, having covered fully support my Leader” to the media and it for many years (especially Iraq). However, then [go] to the tearoom and discuss how to the book contains hardly any references to get rid of him. This is politics.’ To which substantiate its numerous assertions other Crewe adds: ‘This is not just politics: that is than Cockburn’s personal testimony, often how people are.’ Others might argue that quite anecdotal. not all people are hypocritical or deceitful, Yet, what is most questionable about this and at the very least we can expect better of book is its author’s heavy political bias, people we elect to power. But this does not which transpires at the end of the preface detract from her more important concern: when Cockburn quotes Vice-President Joe B OOK R EVIEWS 125 © The Authors 2016. The Political Quarterly © The Political Quarterly Publishing Co. Ltd. 2016 The Political Quarterly, Vol. 87, No. 1 Biden’s statement about the lack of civilians homogeneous category ‘the Sunni’, facing a of the ‘moderate middle’ in the ranks of a no less homogeneous ‘the Shia’. Thus, he Syrian opposition which, so says Biden, is tells us that ‘the Sunni’ are ‘unlikely to be exclusively composed of ‘soldiers’. Biden satisfied’ with regional autonomy and a lar- was trying to justify the Obama administra- ger share of jobs and oil revenues, and tion’s refusal to provide the Syrian opposi- would not be content with less than a ‘full tion with the defensive weapons it requested counterrevolution that aims to take back —primarily anti-aircraft weapons. Patrick power over all of Iraq’. One is left wonder- Cockburn’s immoderate comment on Biden’s ing how an informed author like Cockburn statement is much telling: ‘Seldom have the could attribute the fantasy of an excited real forces at work in creating ISIS and the fringe of Iraqi Arab Sunnis to a whole com- present crisis in Iraq and Syria been so accu- munity. The fact is, however, that he seems rately described.’ to have taken that fantasy for a fait accompli Any reader familiar with the region would since he asserts that, after ISIS’s offensive in know what to expect from the book hencefor- Iraq, the Shia leaders have ‘not grasped that ward. Indeed, a few pages later Cockburn their domination over the Iraqi state... was cites an anonymous ‘intelligence officer from finished’ and that ‘only a Shia rump was a neighbouring country’ (obviously Iraq, left’—an astonishing overstatement indeed. whose Iran-dominated government backs Patrick Cockburn’s pro-Assad bias is also Syria’s Assad) to the effect that ISIS is pleased blatant in the double standard with which when sophisticated weapons are sent to anti- he judges ‘conspiracy theories’ depending on Assad groups, because it can always get them which side they emanate from. Thus, says by force or cash. In the same spirit, Cockburn he, ‘a conspiracy theory much favoured by explains that he couldn’t fly directly to Bagh- the rest of the Syrian opposition and by dad in the summer of 2014 because, he was Western diplomats, that ISIS and Assad are told, ISIS had obtained shoulder-held anti-air- in league, was shown to be false as ISIS won craft missiles ‘originally supplied to anti- victories on the battlefield’. But Cockburn Assad forces in Syria’—a statement that is does not tell the reader by which logic ISIS’s doubly untrue as, first, no such weapons victories on the Syrian battlefield were in were supplied to anti-Assad forces in Syria and by themselves a refutation of the claim and, second, the most sophisticated weapons by the Syrian opposition and Western diplo- on which ISIS managed to lay its hands are mats that the Assad regime had favoured actually those supplied by the US to the Iraqi ISIS’s establishment and expansion in Syria army, which abandoned them ignominiously in order to weaken and discredit the Syrian in its debacle during the summer of 2014. insurgency. This erroneous account is matched soon This claim was made in light of the wide- after by a highly disputable assertion: ‘It is spread conviction that Assad’s intelligence the government and media consensus in the services have been manipulating Iraq’s jiha- West that the civil war in Iraq was reignited dists from the time the US occupied that by the sectarian policies of Iraqi Prime Min- country in 2003. In any event, the above- ister Nouri al-Maliki in Baghdad. In reality it quoted categorical dismissal of that ‘conspir- was the war in Syria that destabilized acy theory’ stands in striking contrast with Iraq...’ This assertion flies in the face of the Cockburn’s indulgence towards another that well-known fact that the vast mass protests is favoured by the opposite side. On the alle- that started in Iraq’s Arab Sunni regions in gation that the resurgence of ISIS was aided 2012 and laid the ground for ISIS’s subse- by Turkish military intelligence, which he quent expansion in those same regions were attributes again to ‘one senior Iraqi source’, not about Syria in the least, but about Al- Cockburn has this to say: ‘This might be dis- Maliki’s sectarian drive, which had swung missed as one more Middle East conspiracy into high gear as soon as the last American theory, but a feature of jihadist movements combat troops left Iraq. is the ease with which they can be manipu- The truth is that Cockburn can barely lated by foreign intelligence services.’ In conceal his contempt for Iraq’s Arab Sunnis, sum, the ease with which ISIS can be manip- whom he often lumps together in a ulated by intelligence services only applies 126 B OOK R EVIEWS The Political Quarterly, Vol. 87, No. 1 © The Authors 2016. The Political Quarterly © The Political Quarterly Publishing Co. Ltd. 2016 to Turkish services in Cockburn’s view, not the knee-jerk ‘anti-imperialist’ circles who to the Syrian ones. reject any form of intervention by Western Cockburn’s contempt for Iraq’s Arab Sun- powers in any situation as a matter of reli- nis is matched by his dislike of the other gious taboo, and who abundantly quote component of what he calls ‘the new Sunni Cockburn on Syria, the Independent’s reporter revolution’, namely the Syrian opposition.
Recommended publications
  • The UAE's Role in Syria's Stability Najla Al-Qasemi, Dubai Public Policy Research Centre
    Syria Transition Challenges Project Discussion Paper (13) The UAE’s Role in Syria’s Stability Najla al-Qasemi, Dubai Public Policy Research Centre (Bhuth) 1 The Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP) The Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP) is an international foundation established in 1995, with 53 member states, for the primary purpose of promoting peace, security and international cooperation through executive education, applied policy research and dialogue. The GCSP trains government officials, diplomats, military officers, international civil servants and NGO and private sector staff in pertinent fields of international peace and security. Syria Transition Challenges Project A multilateral dialogue and research project that aims to build bridges between the EU, Russia, Turkey, and the US on the three issues of Reform, Refugees Return, and Reconstruction. The project is run by the GCSP in collaboration with European University Institute (EUI), Syrian Centre for Policy Research (SCPR), and swisspeace. Editors: Abdulla Ibrahim, Project Lead Researcher Lorraine Charles, Research Associate Tamer Badawi, Research Assistant Author Najla al-Qasemi Najla commenced her work as a researcher at the Emirates Center for Strategic Studies in 1999, in 2002, she joined the United Arab Emirates Ministry for Foreign Affairs as a USA Desk Officer. Later she was assigned the duties of Deputy Director of the Undersecretary Office at the Ministry. In 2004, she was transferred to the United Arab Emirates Mission to the United Nations in Geneva, following Human Rights and humanitarian issues. Since 2008 she was appointed as Ambassador to Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Portugal. Returning to the United Arab Emirates in 2016, she worked as a lecturer at Zayed University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jihadi Threat: ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Beyond
    THE JIHADI THREAT ISIS, AL QAEDA, AND BEYOND The Jihadi Threat ISIS, al- Qaeda, and Beyond Robin Wright William McCants United States Institute of Peace Brookings Institution Woodrow Wilson Center Garrett Nada J. M. Berger United States Institute of Peace International Centre for Counter- Terrorism Jacob Olidort The Hague Washington Institute for Near East Policy William Braniff Alexander Thurston START Consortium, University of Mary land Georgetown University Cole Bunzel Clinton Watts Prince ton University Foreign Policy Research Institute Daniel Byman Frederic Wehrey Brookings Institution and Georgetown University Car ne gie Endowment for International Peace Jennifer Cafarella Craig Whiteside Institute for the Study of War Naval War College Harleen Gambhir Graeme Wood Institute for the Study of War Yale University Daveed Gartenstein- Ross Aaron Y. Zelin Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Washington Institute for Near East Policy Hassan Hassan Katherine Zimmerman Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy American Enterprise Institute Charles Lister Middle East Institute Making Peace Possible December 2016/January 2017 CONTENTS Source: Image by Peter Hermes Furian, www . iStockphoto. com. The West failed to predict the emergence of al- Qaeda in new forms across the Middle East and North Africa. It was blindsided by the ISIS sweep across Syria and Iraq, which at least temporarily changed the map of the Middle East. Both movements have skillfully continued to evolve and proliferate— and surprise. What’s next? Twenty experts from think tanks and universities across the United States explore the world’s deadliest movements, their strate- gies, the future scenarios, and policy considerations. This report reflects their analy sis and diverse views.
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim Women's Rights in the Global Village: Challenges and Opportunities Azizah Y
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 1-2000 Muslim Women's Rights in the Global Village: Challenges and Opportunities Azizah Y. al-Hibri University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications Part of the Law and Gender Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Azizah Y. al-Hibri, Muslim Women's Rights in the Global Village: Challenges and Opportunities, 15 J. L. & Religion 37 (2000). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MUSLIM WOMEN'S RIGHTS IN THE GLOBAL VILLAGE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES Azizah Yahia al-Hibri t INTRODUCTION In this age of information technology that shrank our world into a global village, it is fair to ask how this recent development has impacted Muslim women's rights across the world. Having just traveled through nine Muslim countries, ranging from Pakistan and Bangladesh to the Gulf States, Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon, I would answer that it is leading, slowly but surely, to reassessment and change.' Attempts to accelerate the pace of this change, however, without full understanding of its complex topology, and the deep-rooted commitment by most Muslim women to spiritual and cultural authenticity, could halt or even reverse this process at great cost to women particularly and Muslim societies as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Blasphemy, Charlie Hebdo, and the Freedom of Belief and Expression
    Blasphemy, Charlie Hebdo, and the Freedom of Belief and Expression The Paris attacks and the reactions rashad ali The horrific events in Paris, with the killing of a group of Other reactions highlight and emphasise the fact journalists, a Police officer, and members of the Jewish that Muslims are also victims of terrorism – often the community in France have shocked and horrified most main victims – a point which Charlie Hebdo made in commentators. These atrocities, which the Yemen branch an editorial of the first issue of the magazine published of the global terrorist group al-Qaeda have claimed the following the attack on its staff. Still others highlight responsibility for,1 have led to condemnations from that Jews were targeted merely because they were Jews.2 across the political spectrum and across religious divides. This was even more relevant given how a BBC journalist Some ubiquitous slogans that have arisen, whether appeared to suggest that there was a connection between Je suis Charlie, Ahmed, or Juif, have been used to show how “Jews” treated Palestinians in Israel and the killing of empathy with various victims of these horrid events. Jews in France in a kosher shop.3 These different responses illustrate some of the divides in The most notorious response arguably has not come public reaction, with solidarity shown to various camps. from Islamist circles but from the French neo-fascist For example, some have wished to show support and comedian Dieudonne for stating on his Facebook solidarity with the victims but have not wished to imply account “je me sens Charlie Coulibaly” (“I feel like Charlie or show support to Charlie Hebdo as a publication, Coulibaly”).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding ISIS: the Political Economy of War-Making in Iraq" by Jacob LYPP
    "Understanding ISIS: The political economy of war-making in Iraq" By Jacob LYPP Course “The Political Economy of the Middle East and North” Taught by Eckart Woertz at Sciences Po Fall 2016 This paper has received the KSP Student Paper Award of the Kuwait Program at Sciences Po © The copyright of this paper remains the property of its author. No part of the content may be reproduced, published, distributed, copied or stored for public or private use without written permission of the author. All authorisation requests should be sent to [email protected] Jacob Lypp – PSIA 2016/2017 OCMO 2195 – The Political Economy of the Middle East and North Africa Understanding ISIS: The political economy of war-making in Iraq Introduction Public perceptions of the ongoing conflict in Iraq and Syria are heavily dominated by sectarian narra- tives. It is assumed that “[t]he way in which what is going on in the Middle East has become a reli- gious war has long been obvious” (Murray 2014). According to this view, present-day violence in the region is best understood as a resurgence of ancient hatreds, while political, economic, or other ‘ra- tional’ calculations comprehensible to the Western analyst take the back seat. Academic scholarship (see Fearon and Laitin 2000 for an overview), however, has consistently emphasised the shortcomings of such a primordialist perspective: in spite of the enduring nature of ethnoreligious cleavages, vio- lence is only episodic; simplistic arguments about ancient hatreds consequently fail to explain why ethnic or sectarian language is relied upon in any particular time and place while remaining unused in others.
    [Show full text]
  • L'olitical L'i-IILOSOI'hy of AL-GHAZZALI: an ANALYSIS
    l'OLITICAL l'I-IILOSOI'HY OF AL-GHAZZALI: • AN ANALYSIS Dy Russli Kamarudin A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty ofGraduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree ofMasters ofArts in Islamic Studies Institute oflslamic Studies McGiII University Montreal 1997 ©Russli Kamarudin National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellinglon Ottawa ON K1A DN4 Ottawa ON K1A DN4 Canada Canada YOUf Ille VOltS fdtdrf1llC6 Our ~18 Nort8 rB'sronce The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive pennettant à la National Library ofCanada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies ofthis thesis in microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic fonnats. la fonne de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fonnat électronique. The author retains ownership ofthe L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts from it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. 0-612-43890-2 Canada • ABSTRACT Author : Russli Kamarudin Title : Political Philosophy ofal-Ghazziilr: An Analysis Department : Institute ofislamic Studies Degree : MA This thesis deals with the political philosophy ofal-Ghazziillfrom an analytical point ofview. It focuses its examination on his theory regarding the imamate and sultanate.
    [Show full text]
  • Isis's Insurgency Strategy
    OUT OF THE DESERT ISIS’S STRATEGY FOR A LONG WAR HASSAN HASSAN SEPTEMBER 2018 POLICY PAPER 2018-8 CONTENTS * SUMMARY * KEY POINTS * 1 INTRODUCTION * 2 ISIS’S FORMULA FOR SURVIVAL * 4 ISIS’S INSURGENCY STRATEGY * 8 RETREATING TO RURAL AREAS * 14 RECOVERY SIGNS * 17 WRONG LESSONS LEARNED? * 19 CONCLUSION * 21 ENDNOTES * 23 ABOUT THE AUTHOR * 24 ABOUT THE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE © The Middle East Institute The Middle East Institute 1319 18th Street NW Washington, D.C. 20036 SUMMARY The collapse of ISIS’s caliphate and its subsequent flight from much of its former territory has been a triumph for the anti-ISIS coalition in Iraq and Syria. However, for ISIS, expulsion from former urban strongholds is the end of one chapter and the beginning of another: the group has since rolled out a well-developed strategy to assure its future resurgence. This paper examines ISIS’s actions, publications, and communications to determine its insurgency strategies and long-term organizational outlook, emphasizing sources that have been largely overlooked by forces fighting the group. By analyzing the strategies ISIS uses and has used in its previous incarnations, this paper argues that insurgent groups like ISIS will continute to operate within the ungoverned space along the Syria-Iraq border, and that if left unchecked, the group is likely to re-emerge. KEY POINTS * The contiguous terrain linking Iraq and Syria provides an ideal space for jihadis to endure, entrench, and emerge again. * ISIS’s post-caliphate strategy is to target Sunnis that collaborate with government forces or other insurgent groups using hit-and- run tactics and targeted assassinations, using as its base desert areas.
    [Show full text]
  • BPC 10Th Anniversary Event Biographies
    9/11 to ISIS and Beyond: The Future of Terrorism (And What We Can Do About It) September 8, 2017 | 9:00 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. | Event Agenda 9:00 a.m. Opening remarks Jason Grumet | President, BPC 9:05 a.m. Keynote remarks and fireside chat with Rep. Michael McCaul Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) | Chairman, House Homeland Security Committee; Moderated by: Jason Grumet | President, BPC 9:25 a.m. Audience Q&A with Chairman McCaul 9:35 a.m. Discussion with Gov. Tom Kean and Rep. Lee Hamilton Gov. Thomas Kean | Former Chairman, 9/11 Commission; Former Governor of New Jersey Rep. Lee Hamilton | Former Vice Chairman, 9/11 Commission; Former Representative from Indiana Moderated by: Chris Kojm | Professor of International Affairs, Elliot School of International Affairs, The George Washington University; Former Chair of the National Intelligence Council 9:58 a.m. Audience Q&A with Gov. Tom Kean and Rep. Lee Hamilton 10:10 a.m. Panel I: After Raqqa – The Future of Terrorism Hassan Hassan | Senior Fellow, Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy Nibras Kazimi | Author, Syria Through Jihadist Eyes: A Perfect Enemy Kristin Lord | President and CEO, IREX Katherine Zimmerman | Research Manager, Critical Threats Project, American Enterprise Institute Moderated by: Kim Barker | Reporter, The New York Times; Author, The Taliban Shuffle: Strange Days in Afghanistan and Pakistan 10:40 a.m. Audience Q&A with Panel I 10:54 a.m. Brief break 11:06 a.m. Keynote remarks by Nathan Sales Nathan Sales | Coordinator for Counterterrorism, U.S. State Department 11:28 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Jihadi Rivalry: E Islamic State Challenges Al-Qaida
    B D C A P Number 16, January 2016 Jihadi Rivalry: e Islamic State Challenges al-Qaida Charles Lister JIHADI RIVALRY: The Islamic State Challenges al-Qaida Charles Lister The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment and the analysis and recommendations are not determined by any donation. Copyright © 2016 Brookings Institution THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER Saha 43, Building 63, West Bay, Doha, Qatar www.brookings.edu/doha Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ...............................................................................................1 II. A Revolution from Within ...................................................................................3 III. Al-Qaida: Localism with an Eye Toward the West ................................................7 IV. Islamic State: Ink Spot Expansionism ................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Enclave Governance: How to Circumvent the Assad Regime and Safeguard Syria’S Future
    Brookings Doha Center Analysis Paper Number 30, December 2020 Enclave Governance: How to Circumvent the Assad Regime and Safeguard Syria’s Future Ranj Alaaldin ENCLAVE GOVERNANCE: HOW TO CIRCUMVENT THE ASSAD REGIME AND SAFEGUARD SYRIA’S FUTURE Ranj Alaaldin The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment and the analysis and recommendations are not determined by any donation. Copyright © 2020 Brookings Institution THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER Saha 43, Building 63, West Bay, Doha, Qatar www.brookings.edu/doha Table of Contents I. Executive Summary .................................................................................................1 II. Introduction ..........................................................................................................3 III. Current Challenges to Stability and Peacebuilding ...............................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Radicalism After the Arab Uprisings JON B
    Religious Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings JON B. ALTERMAN, EDITOR Radicalism The Arab uprisings of 2011 created unexpected opportunities for religious radicals. Although many inside and outside the region initially saw the uprisings as liberal triumphs, illiberal forces have benefitted after the Arab disproportionately. In Tunisia, formally marginalized jihadi-salafi groups appealed for mainstream support, and in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood triumphed in Jon B. Alterman Uprisings elections. Even in Saudi Arabia, not known for either lively politics or for Jon B. Alterman political entrepreneurship, a surprising array of forces praised the rise of “Islamic democracy” under a Muslim Brotherhood banner. Yet, at the same time, the Arab uprisings reinforced regional governments’ advantages. The chaos engulfing parts of the region convinced some citizens that they were better off with the governments they had, and many governments successfully employed old and new tools of repression to reinforce the status quo. Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings In the Middle East, conflicts that many thought were coming to an end Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings will continue, as will the dynamism and innovation that have emerged among radical and opposition groups. To face the current threats, governments will need to use many of their existing tools skillfully, but they will also need to judge what tools will no longer work, and what new tools they have at their disposal. The stakes could not be higher. 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 t. 202.887.0200 | f. 202.775.3199 www.csis.org EDITOR Jon B. Alterman Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings Editor Jon B.
    [Show full text]
  • Here to Stay and Growing: Combating ISIS Propaganda Networks the Brookings Project on U.S
    Here to stay and growing: Combating ISIS propaganda networks The Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World U.S.-Islamic World Forum Papers 2015 October 2015 Alberto M. Fernandez The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide in- novative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institu- tion, its management, or its other scholars. Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW independence and impact. Activities supported by its Washington, DC 20036 donors reflect this commitment and the analysis and recommendations are not determined by any donation. www.brookings.edu/islamic-world STEERING n 2015, we returned to Doha for the views of the participants of the work- COMMITTEE the 12th annual U.S.-Islamic World ing groups or the Brookings Institution. MArtiN INDYK Forum. Co-convened annually by Select working group papers will be avail- Executive Ithe Brookings Project on U.S. Relations able on our website. Vice President with the Islamic World and the State of Brookings Qatar, the Forum is the premier inter- We would like to take this opportunity BRUCE JONES national gathering of leaders in govern- to thank the State of Qatar for its sup- Vice President ment, civil society, academia, business, port in convening the Forum with us.
    [Show full text]