Robert Capa and Agustí Centelles Against the Backdrop of the Spanish
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The photojournalist as a myth: Robert Capa and Agustí Centelles against the backdrop of the Spanish Civil War El fotoperiodista como mito: Robert Capa y Agustí Centelles ante la guerra civil española TERESA FERRÉ PANISELLO1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i33.6913 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9325-9422 Eighty years after the modernisation of the myth of the war photographer through the figure of Robert Capa during the Spanish Civil War, this article will examine its development and the process of mythification, drawing parallels with Agustí Centelles during the transition to democracy. From that period onwards, media comparisons between the two have been constant, overshadowing the other professionals who covered the conflict, which was ground-breaking from the perspective of visual communication. KEYWORDS: Photojournalism, Robert Capa, Agustí Centelles, Spanish Civil War, Myth. Ochenta años después de la modernización del mito del fotógrafo de guerra con la figura de Robert Capa durante la guerra civil española, analizamos su evolución y el proceso de mitificación por analogía en torno a Agustí Centelles en la Transición. Desde entonces la comparación mediática entre ambos es constante, eclipsando al resto de profesionales que cubrieron aquel conflicto, innovador desde la perspectiva de la comunicación visual. PALABRAS CLAVE: Fotoperiodismo, Robert Capa, Agustí Centelles, guerra civil española, Mito. 1 Departament de Mitjans, Comunicació i Cultura. Universitat Autònoma de Barce- lona, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: 10/07/17. Accepted: 13/12/2017. Published: 19/12/2018. Comunicación y Sociedad, 33, September-December, 2018, pp. 237-254. 237 238 Teresa Ferré Panisello THE CAMERA GOES TO WAR War has been a constant feature throughout history and it has been depicted in the arts at particular times, using different techniques and with differing agendas. The medium of photography was no exception, although, as Monegal and Torres (2004) have shown, it soon became clear that the result would be different from classical pictorial representations of war. The first photographs of war taken using daguerreotypes were of the 1846 conflict between the USA and Mexico over the occupation of Texas. But it was the Crimean War (1853-1856) that was considered to be the first in which the press showed an interest in photography, publishing images taken by Roger Fenton (Sousa, 2003, p. 32). It is worth noting that, according to Freund (1999, p. 97), some of them were censored so as not to frighten the families of the soldiers. In 1863, over 300 photographers captured the American Civil War on camera, although “many fell into oblivion because their photos were attributed to Matthew G. Brady” (Newhall, 2002, pp. 88-89). From 1898 onwards, during the Cuban War of Independence, the American mass media made “abundant use of the images, including forged, staged, and unreliable photographs, thus contributing to the fever of war and to the circulation of the newspapers themselves” (Sousa, 2003, p. 34). It was in the context of the new century, as Lebeck and Von Dewitz assert (2002), that photojournalism as narration developed in illustrated magazines, with the images being organized both chronologically and thematically, usually provided by a photographer whose name began to be included at that time. With regard to the content, the pages were filled with disasters, leisure activities, panoramic views of life in the cities, and technological and sporting achievements. Among of the mythological creations constructed by the mass media, some related to the profession of journalism itself. One of the most popular was that of the war correspondent, usually imagined—thanks to cinematic and literary fiction—as a photographer or operator of a television camera. Barthes states in Mitologías [Mythologies] (2000), that the myth is a message, a means of signifying. If we consider the war photojournalist as a myth, the message is a strong, adventurous, elegant, seductive man, who is constantly risking his life. The photojournalist as a myth: ... 239 The Cuban War of Independence was significant for photojournalism because, as Gervais (2010) points out, it saw the birth of the myth of the war photographer in the press, evolving “from the status of artist to photographer”, and the construction of a sequential narrative of war, starting with images of the front and ending with the transport of the wounded. Gervais examines the work of James Hare (1856-1946), who was sent by Collier’s to cover his first war, although he also sent photographs to other American newspapers and European illustrated magazines such as the Berliner Illustrirte Zeitung or L’Illustration. According to Roth (1997, p. 227): “His coverage of the Spanish American War elevated him to the top ranks of the photojournalism of his day” (Gervais, 2010). The worldwide fame that Hare enjoyed a century ago bears no relation to current knowledge of him; a fact that makes him an obvious example of Barthes’ (2000) idea that there are no eternal myths, since mythology can only have a historical foundation. This article was borne out of a recurring question: why, eighty years on, has the profession of photojournalism in the Spanish Civil War been reduced to just one or, at most, two individuals? This research focuses on the figure of the war photographer as a mythical creation of the media. Its objective is to examine the causes of the modernization of this myth in the context of the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), when Robert Capa was named as the world’s best photographer. The public figure of this photojournalist, whose identity was fictitious, and his presence for several decades as the sole point of reference will be considered based on a bibliographic review, which is necessary in order to show his influence on the process of the creation and popularization of the photographer known as the “Spanish Capa” or the “Catalan Capa”, Agustí Centelles (1909-1985). This work will undertake, for the first time, a comparative analysis of the two; at the same time, it will reveal previously unpublished evidence concerning the process of Centelles’ mythification, based on an analysis of journalistic resources comprising 52 articles from the Spanish press (newspapers and magazines) published between 1978 and 1982.2 These form part of the study of this 2 Works relating to exhibitions and books on Centelles published during the same period have also been consulted, as well as three television pro- 240 Teresa Ferré Panisello public figure, started by the author with the editing of his memoirs and her research into his period of exile in France. ROBERT CAPA: THE ENDURING MYTH OF THE MODERN WAR PHOTOGRAPHER From a communications perspective, it can be said that the Spanish Civil War was widely covered by the global media, set a standard for the Second World War, and saw a pioneering use of radio and sound film for propaganda. In the golden age of photojournalism, it was the battle in which the camera became the protagonist in representations of the war. The press was at its peak and in both foreign and national publications, the photographer’s bravery and the reference to the exclusivity of his images formed part of the journalistic narrative (Adam, Antebi, Ferré, & González, 2015). According to Colombo (1997), a new relationship emerged between photographer, camera and tragedy: The human point of view appears (participation, passion, compassion), which connects the author with the event, and the technical point of view (which also includes the aesthetic vision), which connects the author with his instrument and which is expressed in the frame, in the contrast, in the choice of the perfect moment and in the beauty of the opportunity (p.140). On a technical note, it is worth noting that small cameras were being used for the first time in war, although, according to López Mondejar: “the almost complete absence of universal standard negatives meant that many photographers were forced to revert to their old plate cameras” (1997, p. 299). The worldwide media sent correspondents to what appeared to be a coup d’état that would shortly be put down by the government. Meanwhile, photojournalists from Madrid and Barcelona, hubs of grammes, one of which concentrated solely on Centelles. A representative sample of the material will be cited here. The photojournalist as a myth: ... 241 media production and distribution, took to the streets camera in hand from July 1936 onwards. The working conditions of these photojournalists during the conflict are a key aspect that has not been studied in any detail. It is important to move away from the supposed solitary hero and to understand that they would have been granted permission to work, and were subject to the control and censorship of the authorities, as well as having to respect the laws enacted by the government in December 1936 which meant that they were obliged—among other things—to register any photographic equipment in their possession (Adam, Antebi, Ferré & González, 2015; Hernández Pin, 2010). Of the dozens of foreign and Spanish professionals who covered this war —most of them in the republican zone— only one became well known: Andrei Friedman (1913-1954),3 known internationally as Robert Capa. Towards the end of 1938, the English magazine Picture Post proclaimed him “the world’s best war photographer” for his report on the Battle of the Segre, which followed his reports on events in Madrid, Aragon and the Battle of the Ebro, among others (Whelan, 2007). He was 25 years old and this was his first war. Thus, the myth of the war photographer was modernized through a media that was in a constant state of technological development and a public that was fascinated by images reproduced technically in mass society. Unlike Hare, the modern myth was born out of a fictitious identity.