Identification, Biology, & Control of Aboveground Pests in FL Citrus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Identification, Biology, & Control of Aboveground Pests in FL Citrus February 3, 2021 • What is IPM? • What kind of information do you need to develop an IPM program? Managing pests effectively requires knowledge of their population, phenology, and host association(s) Citrus Production in FL • Perennial crop • Historically stable ecosystem regarding insect management • Low insecticide inputs prior to ACP • Retention of beneficial species (e.g. lady beetles) within/near crops • More cases of successful biological control than any other cropping system • ACP + higher insecticide inputs: • T.B.D. Introduction of invasive citrus pests 1964- Diaprepes root weevil 1993- Citrus Leafminer (CLM) 1995- Brown citrus aphid L. Buss UF/IFAS 1998- Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) Arthropod Pests Affecting Florida Citrus Production Vedalia lady beetle (Rodolia cardinalis) • Introduced into California in 1888 • First outstanding success in the field of classical biological control • Successfully repeated in Florida in 1899 Cottony cushion scale (Icerya purchasi) Arthropod aboveground impacts on citrus • Fruit damage • Cosmetic vs destructive damage • Foliage damage • Reduces photosynthetic capacity • Reduces new growth • Disease vectors • Insects that move diseases between hosts Fruit Damage Direct damage to fruit Damage to peel • Feeding reduces fruit quality, • Largely cosmetic shape, or size • Problem for fresh market • Reduction in yield or cause fruit to drop • Problem for fruit grown for fresh & processed markets Damage from leaf-footed bug feeding. Thrips feeding damage on peel. Weeks UF/IFAS CREC UF/IFAS CREC Stinkbugs and Leaf-footed bugs Weeks UF/IFAS CREC Weeks UF/IFAS CREC Weeks UF/IFAS CREC Weeks UF/IFAS CREC Use piercing-sucking mouthpart to puncture fruit & feed. Feeding holes create openings for secondary pests/pathogens to enter including bacteria, fungi, and other insects. Weeks UF/IFAS CREC Rust mites Predominant arthropod pest of fresh & processed citrus in Florida Citrus rust mite Pink citrus rust mite (Phyllocoptruta oleivora) (Aculops pelekassi) UF/IFAS CREC UF/IFAS CREC Rust mite damage to citrus • Damage • Feeding injury • Russeting of fruit & leaves • Mild to severe distortion of new leaf growth • Brown lesions on lower surfaces & along midribs of mature leaves • May produce mesophyll collapse, Leaf distortion on new growth chlorosis, and leaf drop Citrus rust mite Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) UF/IFAS CREC UF/IFAS CREC Rust mite development • Females lay 2 eggs/day • ~30 eggs in a lifetime • Egg → adult in 6 days • Adult male longevity approx. 6 days • Adult female longevity approx. 14 days Citrus rust mite seasonality Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) UF/IFAS CREC CRM populations peak in early summer, then again at a smaller scale in mid- late fall depending on weather. 0 J a n Fe b M ar Ap r M ay J u n J u l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c Pink citrus rust mite Aculops pelekassi (Keifer) UF/IFAS CREC UF/IFAS CREC PCRM damage to fruit appears as bronzing all over because it is done early in the fruit’s development. Pink citrus rust mite (PCRM) Aculops pelekassi (Keifer) UF/IFAS CREC PCRM populations peak in mid spring/early summer. Populations build up on flowers & leaves prior to feeding on fruit. 0 J a n Fe b M ar Ap r M ay J u n J u l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c Early in the season, pink citrus rust mites are more prone to damage leaves than the citrus rust mite Natural enemy complex for rust mites Phytoseiidae Stigmaeidae A. Pelegrin Citrus rust mites Tydeidae Cheyletidae E. McDonald Other predacious arthropods: Disease lady beetles, ants, spiders, (next slide) lacewing larvae…. Phytoseiid image: http://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/phytoseiidae/key/phytoseiidae/Media/Html/mites.htm Tydeid image: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Yellow_mite_(Tydeidae),_Lorryia_formosa.jpg Hirsutella thompsonii Fungal pathogen of mites, biological control for rust mites in citrus Control of CRM by Hirsutella Action thresholds for control of rust mites • Processed fruit • 10 rust mites / 2 cm2 • Controlled with 1-3 oil or miticide applications/season • Fresh fruit • 2 rust mites / 2 cm2 • Controlled with 3-5 miticide applications/season Citrus mealybug Planococcus citri • Most commonly found in spring and early summer • Prefer sheltered locations • Females lay 300-600 eggs • Damage • Feeding causes cosmetic damage to fruit • Produce large amounts of honeydew, leads to problems with sooty mold • Can cause heavy fruit drop in grapefruit • Cultivars most affected: grapefruit, navals, valencia Natural enemies of citrus mealybug • Mealybugs generally occur at low levels and are kept in check by three natural enemies: • Cryptolaemus montrouzieri • Lady beetle • The “mealybug destroyer” • Found in groves May-June • Entomophthora fumosa • Fungus • Prevalent after summer rainy season starts • Leptomastidae abnormis • Hymenopteran parasitoid Various species of lady beetles (Coccinellidae) Cryptolaemus montrouzieri contribute to the - “mealybug destroyer” mortality of several - Efficient predator of mealybugs despite citrus pests. the waxy covering - Nymphal stages LOOK like mealybugs - Can be purchased for release, but there are drawbacks… Nymph Adult Control of Citrus Mealybugs • Effective products for mealybugs have negative impacts on beneficial insect populations • Insecticides should ONLY be applied to severe infestations • Applications are most effective when applied before mealybugs have settled between fruit clusters • Fruit clusters serve as shelter from management actions BUT naturally occurring predators can often reach these locations Lebbeck mealybug/ Hibiscus mealybug Nipaecoccus viridis • First found in Florida citrus in 2019 • Seasonal life cycle in Florida not described • Some biology described from other countries, mostly lab/greenhouse studies • Damage • Direct damage to fruit, leaves, stem • Fruit drop Natural enemies of lebbeck mealybug • Mealybug destroyers • Cryptolaeumus montrouzieri • 2 species of flies (generalists) • Lucopina bella • Ocyptamus s.1. group • Predatory lepidopteran (generalist) • Anatrachyntis badia, pink scavenger caterpillar • Undetermined parasitoids • Lacewings (not pictured) Control of lebbeck mealybug • Similar to citrus mealybug, chemical controls can have negative impacts on natural enemies. BUT predators alone are not enough to control this pest right now. • Several conventional insecticides, insect growth regulators, and entomopathenogenic fungi look promising for management options. Scale insect pests of citrus • Several species of ARMORED SCALES can be problematic • Red scale, purple scale, Chaff scale • Scale insects in Florida have historically been under biological control by a large number of natural enemies • Not currently considered key pests in the development of pest management programs D. Papacek http://thecitrusguy.blogspot.com/2012/05/citrus-with-some-mussel.html “Secrets to success” for biological control of scale insects • Adult scales are sessile- either VERY slow moving or not moving at all • High number of offspring to support natural enemy population growth • Populations tend to be concentrated → easy for natural enemies to find Aggregation of red scale on green fruit Florida red scale Chrysomphalus aonidum • Damage • Feeding occurs on leaves, green twigs, and fruit • Feeding causes discoloration at the feeding site UF/IFAS CREC UF/IFAS CREC UF/IFAS CREC Florida Red Scale (Chrysomphalus aonidum) • Red scale now under biological control by parasitic wasps released in Florida (Aphytis wasps) • Good example of successful classical biological control Florida red scale • Left: FRS Adult Female with Cover Lifted • Lower left: 3rd instars of Aphytis holoxanthus on adult female scale • Below: 5 fresh pupae of Aphytis holoxanthus under FRS cover Purple scale Lepidosaphes beckii • Once major pest of fruit, leaves, and twigs • Populations are highest in late spring/early UF/IFAS CREC summer • Parasitoid (Aphytis lepidosaphes) introduced in 1950s to manage Parasitoid emergence hole UF/IFAS CREC Chaff scale Parlatoria pergandii • Often found on trunk and inner canopy • Fruit feeding causes spotting • Slow rate of reproduction + parasitoid Aphytis hispanicus historically kept UF/IFAS CREC populations low UF/IFAS CREC Thrips • Flower thrips • Greenhouse thrips • Frankliniella bispinosa • Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis • Frankliniella kelliae • Chili thrips • Orchid thrips • Scirtothrips dorsalis • Chaetanaphothrips orchidii • Danothrips trifasciatus L. Buss UF/IFAS UF/IFAS CREC Thrips move between plants, making them a huge challenge to manage. Thrips populations can reach high numbers in flowers (semi-protected)& lead to fruit damage F. bispinosa collected from 20 open flowers/rep in March 2001 (Hillsborough Co.) Variety Adults Larvae Murcott 604 203 Murcott 815 379 Murcott 602 611 Rhode Red Valencia 2,166 1,696 Rhode Red Valencia 2,749 1,488 Rhode Red Valencia 2,468 855 Rhode Red Valencia 2,061 1,070 Control of F. bispinosa on ‘Navel’ Application Mean no. % yield Treatment Insecticides Rate date fruit/m3 increase Chlorpyrifos 4EC 7.01 L 14 Feb 1 34.2a 43 Formetanate 1.4 kg 1 Mar hydrochloride 92 SP Dimethoate 4 EC 8.18 L 14 Feb 2 33.9a 42 Formetanate 1.4 kg 1 Mar hydrochloride 92 SP Formetanate 3 1.4 kg 15 Feb 27.9b 17 hydrochloride 92 SP control n/a -- -- 23.9c -- Childers. 1992. J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 1330-1339 1921 The Citrus Industry 2(3): 19 J.R. Watson 1940 The Citrus Industry 21: 5, 8-9, 12-13, 17 “…the so-called thrips marks are caused by the young fruit being rubbed against leaves
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae): the First Report from Turkey and a Case of Importation to Poland

    Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae): the First Report from Turkey and a Case of Importation to Poland

    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2016) 40: http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1512-22 Anatrachyntis badia (Hodges, 1962) (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae): the first report from Turkey and a case of importation to Poland Łukasz DAWIDOWICZ*, Robert ROZWAŁKA Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland Received: 07.12.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 03.05.2016 Final Version: 00.00.2016 Abstract: Anatrachyntis badia (Hodges, 1962) (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae) is an opportunistic species native to the southern part of North America. This species was given from several dozens of plants therein from many cultivable plants, such as limes, grapefruits, bananas, peaches, cabbage, blossoms of coconut, Cycas spp., and even pine cones. Thus, it was accidentally introduced to many other countries with appropriate climate with some plants. It can be considered as a plant pest in some cases (e.g., sorghum). The species quite often occurs conjointly with other pest insects, such as mealybug or honeydew mothCryptoblabes gnidiella (Millière, 1867) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). This paper presents the first report of this North American species from Turkey and a case of its importation to Poland by pomegranates deriving from Spain and Turkey. The mentioned data simultaneously constitute the first records about the species in Poland. Key words: Alien species, introduction, pest, pomegranate, first record, Poland, Turkey, Spain 1. Introduction and Sinev, 2003; Heckford and Sterling, 2004) (Figure The genus Anatrachyntis Meyrick 1915 comprises more 1). A. badia has a reddish brown head, reddish brown than 50 moths species, mostly abundant in the Oriental thorax with mixed darker brown, dark grayish posteriorly.
  • Newsletter 90

    Newsletter 90

    Norfolk Moth Survey c/o Natural History Dept., Castle Museum, Norwich, NR1 3JU Newsletter No.90 November 2016 INTRODUCTION With the flurry of activity through the latter part of the summer, it is easy to forget how cool, wet and frustrating the early part of the season often was. Opinion generally seems to suggest that, while the range of species seen was much to be expected, actual numbers of moths were down on the whole. However, one event during that early period brought the subject of moths to the attention of the media, both locally and nationally. This was the great invasion of Diamond- backed moths, Plutella xylostella, that took place at the very end of May and the first days of June. It would be no exaggeration to say that literally millions of these tiny moths arrived on these shores, with at least one commentator describing it as “...a plague of biblical proportion”. Several of us found ourselves answering queries and calls from a variety of sources in connection with this influx. Despite the dire warnings proffered by some sections of the media - and others, our cabbages weren’t totally obliterated as a result. In fact, the expected boost in numbers resulting from these original invaders breeding here, just didn’t seem to happen. In what might have otherwise been a distinctly average season, it is good to be able to report that twelve new species have been added to the Norfolk list this year. Amazingly, seven of these have been adventives, including one species new for the UK.
  • Insect Pollination of Cycads 9 10 Alicia Toon1, L

    Insect Pollination of Cycads 9 10 Alicia Toon1, L

    1 2 DR. ALICIA TOON (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-1517-2601) 3 4 5 Article type : Invited Review 6 7 8 Insect pollination of cycads 9 10 Alicia Toon1, L. Irene Terry2, William Tang3, Gimme H. Walter1, and Lyn G. Cook1 11 12 1The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, Qld, 4072, 13 Australia 2 14 University of Utah, School of Biological Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA 15 3 USDA APHIS PPQ South Florida, P.O.Box 660520, Miami, FL 33266, USA 16 17 Corresponding author: Alicia Toon 18 [email protected] Ph: +61 (0) 411954179 19 Goddard Building, The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, 20 Qld, 4072, Australia. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Manuscript Author 31 This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/AEC.12925 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved 32 33 Acknowledgements 34 We would like to thank Dean Brookes for discussions about genetic structure in cycad 35 pollinating thrips populations. Also, thanks to Mike Crisp for discussions about plant 36 diversification and Paul Forster for information on Australian cycads. This work was funded 37 by ARC Discovery Grant DP160102806. 38 39 Abstract 40 Most cycads have intimate associations with their insect pollinators that parallel those of 41 well-known flowering plants, such as sexually-deceptive orchids and the male wasps and 42 bees they deceive.
  • EU Project Number 613678

    EU Project Number 613678

    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
  • Hampshire & Isle of Wight Butterfly & Moth Report 2013

    Hampshire & Isle of Wight Butterfly & Moth Report 2013

    Butterfly Conservation HAMPSHIRE & ISLE OF WIGHT BUTTERFLY & MOTH REPORT 2013 Contents Page Introduction – Mike Wall 2 The butterfly and moth year 2013 – Tim Norriss 3 Branch reserves updates Bentley Station Meadow – Jayne Chapman 5 Magdalen Hill Down – Jenny Mallett 8 Yew Hill – Brian Fletcher 9 Dukes on the Edge – Dan Hoare 11 Reflections on Mothing – Barry Goater 13 Brown Hairstreak – Henry Edmunds 18 Obituary: Tony Dobson – Mike Wall 19 Hampshire & Isle of Wight Moth Weekend 2013 – Mike Wall 21 Common Species Summary 24 Branch photographic competition 26 Alternative Mothing – Tim Norriss 28 Great Butterfly Race 2013 – Lynn Fomison 29 Weather report 2013 – Dave Owen 30 Glossary of terms 32 Butterfly report 2013 33 Butterfly record coverage 2013 33 Summary of earliest-latest butterfly sightings 2013 34 2012-2013 butterfly trends in Hampshire & Isle of Wight 35 Species accounts 36 Moth report 2013 72 Editorial 72 Moth record coverage 2013 73 Species accounts 74 List of observers 146 Index to Butterfly Species Accounts 152 1 Introduction I have pleasure in writing this, my first introduction as Chairman of the Branch. When I joined Butterfly Conservation some ten years ago, as a new recruit to the wonderful world of moths, I never envisaged becoming part of the main committee let alone finding myself on this ‘lofty perch’! Firstly, I would like to register my and the Branch’s thanks to Pete Eeles for his support and enthusiasm for the branch during his time as chair, despite the pressures of a job that often saw him away from the country, and to the other members of the main committee for their support and enthusiasm over the past twelve months.
  • The Ecology and Evolution of Cycads and Their Symbionts

    The Ecology and Evolution of Cycads and Their Symbionts

    The Ecology and Evolution of Cycads and Their Symbionts The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Salzman, Shayla. 2019. The Ecology and Evolution of Cycads and Their Symbionts. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42013055 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The ecology and evolution of cycads and their symbionts ADISSERTATIONPRESENTED BY SHAYLA SALZMAN TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ORGANISMIC AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE SUBJECT OF BIOLOGY HARVARD UNIVERSITY CAMBRIDGE,MASSACHUSETTS AUGUST 2019 c 2019 – SHAYLA SALZMAN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Thesis advisors: Professors Naomi E. Pierce & Robin Hopkins Shayla Salzman The ecology and evolution of cycads and their symbionts ABSTRACT Interactions among species are responsible for generating much of the biodiversity that we see today, yet coevolved associations with high species specificity are rare in nature and have sometimes been considered to be evolutionary dead ends. The plant order Cycadales is among the most ancient lineages of seed plants, and the tissues of all species are highly toxic. Cycads exhibit many specialized interactions, making them ideal for analyzing the causes and consequences of symbiotic relationships. In Chapter 1, I characterize the pollination mutualism between Zamia furfuracea cycads and their Rhopalotria furfuracea weevil pollinators.
  • Nota Lepidopterologica

    Nota Lepidopterologica

    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 29 (1/2): 49-63 49 Faunistic notes on Momphidae, Batrachedridae, Stathmopodidae and Cosmopterigidae from the Maltese Islands ^ Sjaak (J.C.) Köster ' & Paul Sammut ' National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, PO Box 95 17, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected] 2 'Fawkner', Dingli Road, Rabat RBT 07, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. An annotated list of Momphidae, Batrachedridae, Stathmopodidae and Cosmopterigidae (Lepidoptera) collected on the Maltese Islands is provided. Sixteen species are recorded (1 Momphidae, 1 Batrachedridae, 1 Stathmopodidae, 13 Cosmopterigidae), one of them is new to the Maltese Islands and Europe: Bifascioides leucomelanellus (Rebel, 1917) and three of them are new to the Maltese Islands: Mompha subbistrigella (Haworth, 1828), Anatrachyntis badia (Hodges, 1962), and Ascalenia echidnias (Meyrick, 1891). Mompha subbistrigella (Haworth, 1828) and Eteobalea serratella (Treitschke, 1833) are mentioned as new for Sardinia. Key words. Lepidoptera, Momphidae, Batrachedridae, Stathmopodidae, Cosmopterigidae, Maltese Islands, new records. Introduction The Maltese Islands are a group of small, low-lying islands situated almost at the centre of the Mediterranean, from 35°48'28"to 36°0'0"N and 14°11'04" to 14°34'37"E. They are 92 km south of Sicily and 252 km north of the Libyan coast. The total area of the archipelago is 320 km/sq. The Maltese archipelago is composed of three inhabited islands, Malta, Gozo and Comino and a number of smaller, uninhabited islets and rocks. From the ecological point of view, the most important of these are Cominotto, Filfa, St.
  • Insecta Mundi 0739: 1–26 Zoobank Registered: Urn:Lsid:Zoobank.Org:Pub:9C545611-FC84-414F-A162-74E4CCE63A00

    Insecta Mundi 0739: 1–26 Zoobank Registered: Urn:Lsid:Zoobank.Org:Pub:9C545611-FC84-414F-A162-74E4CCE63A00

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337730443 Lepidoptera pests of sapodilla (Manilkara zapota (L.) van Royen) in south Florida, with some comments on life history and natural control Article · December 2019 CITATIONS READS 0 28 5 authors, including: Jose I Martinez Jonathan H Crane University of Florida University of Florida 3 PUBLICATIONS 5 CITATIONS 150 PUBLICATIONS 1,243 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Daniel Carrillo University of Florida 112 PUBLICATIONS 967 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Annona View project Phylogeny of yellowhorns, pantheas, and jaguar moths (Lepidoptera: Pantheinae) and their evolutionary production of chemical defenses View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jose I Martinez on 04 December 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. December 3 2019 INSECTA 26 urn:lsid:zoobank. A Journal of World Insect Systematics org:pub:9C545611-FC84-414F- UNDI M A162-74E4CCE63A00 0739 Lepidoptera pests of sapodilla (Manilkara zapota (L.) van Royen) in south Florida, with some comments on life history and natural control Jose I. Martinez McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Jonathan H. Crane Tropical Research and Education Center University of Florida Homestead, FL 33031, USA Jeff Wasielewski UF/IFAS Extension Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces Department 18710 SW 288 Street Homestead, FL 33030, USA Jacqueline Y. Miller McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Daniel Carrillo Tropical Research and Education Center University of Florida Homestead, FL 33031, USA Date of issue: December 3, 2019 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Jose I.
  • Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin 2010

    Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin 2010

    Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin Number 10 April 2009 – March 2010 Butterfly Conservation Report No. S10-10 Compiled & Edited by A. Rosenthal (Conservation Officer – Threatened Species), M. Parsons (Head of Moth Conservation) & N. Bourn (Director of Conservation). April 2010 Butterfly Conservation Company limited by guarantee, registered in England (2206468) Registered Office: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset. BH20 5QP Charity registered in England and Wales (254937) and in Scotland (SCO39268) www.butterfly-conservation.org Rosenthal, A., Parsons, M. & Bourn, N. & (eds.) 2010 Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin Number 10: April 2009 – March 2010, Butterfly Conservation, Wareham. (Butterfly Conservation Report No. S10-10) Contents: 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... 2 3 Conservation action for UK Biodiversity Action Plan Lepidoptera ................................... 2 3.1 Update on UK BAP moths – a summary for the year 2009 ....................................... 3 3.2 UK BAP moth newsletter ......................................................................................... 17 3.3 Update on UK BAP butterflies a summary for the year 2009 .................................. 17 3.4 Additional Species Factsheets ................................................................................ 22 4 Butterfly
  • EPPO Reporting Service

    ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN ET MEDITERRANEENNE PLANT PROTECTION POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES ORGANIZATION EPPO Reporting Service NO. 12 PARIS, 2007-12-01 CONTENTS ____________________________________________________________________________________ 2007/229 - Index of the EPPO Reporting Service 1, rue Le Nôtre Tel. : 33 1 45 20 77 94 E-mail : [email protected] 75016 Paris Fax : 33 1 42 24 89 43 Web : www.eppo.org EPPO Reporting Service – Index 2007/229 Index of the EPPO Reporting Service The following index covers all Reporting Service articles published in 2007. This index is also available as an Excel file from the EPPO Web site: http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOReporting/Reporting_Archives.htm Absence 2007/025 - Peronosclerospora sorghi does not occur in Australia 2007/028 - Survey on glasshouse thrips and tospoviruses in Hungary 2007/029 - Surveys on grapevine yellows and insect vectors in Hungary 2007/134 - Invasive and quarantine pests in forests in Slovakia 2007/152 - Brevipalpus californicus does not occur in France 2007/153 - Phakopsora euvitis eradicated from Australia 2007/178 - Surveys on Phytophthora species in Lithuania 2007/180 - Surveys on Globodera species in Lithuania 2007/193 - Cucumber vein yellowing virus is no longer found in France Abutilon theophrasti 2007/202 - Economical estimates of weeds: the examples of Sicyos angulatus and Abutilon theophrasti in Catalunya, Spain Acacia dealbata 2007/083 - Participation of the nursery industry in controlling invasive alien plants: a booklet of substitute plants
  • A First Record of Anatrachyntis Badia (Hodges 1962) (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae) on Zamia Integrifolia (Zamiaceae)

    A First Record of Anatrachyntis Badia (Hodges 1962) (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae) on Zamia Integrifolia (Zamiaceae)

    A first record of Anatrachyntis badia (Hodges 1962) (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae) on Zamia integrifolia (Zamiaceae) Catherine Hua1, Shayla Salzman1,*, and Naomi E. Pierce1 Adult moths that appeared morphologically similar to species in Zamia cycads have symbiotic pollinating relationships with 2 genera of the genus Anatrachyntis (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae) were ob- Coleoptera (Stevenson et al. 1998). Larvae and adults of both Rhopalo- served emerging from male cones of Zamia integrifolia (Zamiaceae) tria and Pharaxanotha species feed, mate, shelter, and oviposit in male collected in Coral Gables, Florida, USA, during Dec 2014 at a time when cones (Stevenson et al. 1998; Fawcett & Norstog 1993; Tang 1987). the cones were releasing pollen. These moths have been recorded as- When these pollinators are present, cone fertility approaches 100% sociating with cycads on only 2 previous occasions: (1) Adults of an but when excluded, fertility drops to nothing (Tang 1987). unidentified species ofAnatrachyntis that develop larvae in the pollen The Cycadales is the most threatened plant order (IUCN 2017), and cone were reported as pollinators of an Old World cycad, Cycas micro- because it relies on insect pollination, identification of another pol- nesica Hill (Cycadaceae), on Guam (Terry et al. 2009; Marler & Niklas linator is beneficial for conservation efforts. One-to-one mutualistic 2011), and larval feeding damage by this species was found to increase pollinator-plant relationships are fragile; if a pollinator goes extinct, lifetime reproductive events of the host plant (Marler 2010a, b); and the plant will follow suit and vice versa. Conservationists are currently (2) Bella and Mazzeo (2006) discovered Anatrachyntis badia Hodges working to grow these endangered plants ex situ before returning (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae) larvae feeding on the leaves of culti- them to the field.
  • ARP DE SEMILLAS DE BRÓCOLI (Brassica Oleracea L. Var. Italica) Y DE PLANTAS a RAÍZ DESNUDA DE FRAMBUESA (Rubus Idaeus L.) ORIGINARIAS DE ESPAÑA

    ARP DE SEMILLAS DE BRÓCOLI (Brassica Oleracea L. Var. Italica) Y DE PLANTAS a RAÍZ DESNUDA DE FRAMBUESA (Rubus Idaeus L.) ORIGINARIAS DE ESPAÑA

    UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DEL ECUADOR FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS CARRERA DE INGENIERIA AGRONÓMICA ARP DE SEMILLAS DE BRÓCOLI (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) Y DE PLANTAS A RAÍZ DESNUDA DE FRAMBUESA (Rubus idaeus L.) ORIGINARIAS DE ESPAÑA. TRABAJO DE GRADO PREVIA A LA OBTENCIÓN DEL TÍTULO DE INGENIERA AGRÓNOMA BLANCA ISABEL NOBOA CHICAIZA TUTOR: ING. AGR. NICOLA MASTROCOLA M.Sc. QUITO, DICIEMBRE 2016 DEDICATORIA A Dios A mis padres Blanca y César A mis hermanos Andrea y Alejandro ii AGRADECIMIENTO Un sincero agradecimiento a AGROCALIDAD por ser la institución que colaboró con el desarrollo de esta investigación y a la Ing. Sandy Serrano por su conocimiento, orientación y disposición durante este tiempo. A la Universidad Central del Ecuador, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas y sus docentes por sus enseñanzas tanto de la profesión como de la vida, impulsándome a seguir siempre adelante. Mi agradecimiento hacia Dios quien ha forjado mi camino y me ha guiado en el sendero correcto, por sus bendiciones y misericordia, que a pesar de mi debilidad e inconstancia sigue obrando maravillas en mi vida. A mis padres Blanca y César por su apoyo, sacrificio y sobre todo por confiar en mi. Muchos de mis logros se los debo a ustedes entre los que se incluye este. A mis hermanos Andrea y Daniel, por tantos momentos bellos que hemos compatido, por su apoyo incondicional y por ser un ejemplo, ustedes son la mayor bendición y alegría. A mi abuelita “Manina” que aunque ya no esté presente es el angel que me cuida desde el cielo. Lo más lindo que hizo Dios -dice la biblia- fue la familia, gracias a ustedes por estar conmigo en todo momento, los amo.