GROW Act: Round 1 Goes to Teamsters, Mack Says
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vol. 80 – No. 4 ® 9 October 1, 2020 organize and join a union. lawmakers to deregulate the is particularly important to our Now the billionaires be- trucking industry. That deba- Union. Many of our members hind this initiative would cle cost us countless mem- are drivers who work for em- have us believe that this is bers and ultimately drove ployers that compete or will good for workers. Prop 22 down wages and benefits in compete directly with TNCs By Shane Gusman would declare as a mat- the entire industry. and DNCs. For TNCs, think ter of law that Transpor- So, when the tech billion- school bus drivers and public California Teamsters’ tation Network Co. (TNC) aires say Prop 22 is good transit. For DNCs, think UPS Chief Lobbyist employees, like Uber and for workers, don’t believe the and any other parcel deliv- NOWe’ve had many ballot Lyft drivers, and Delivery hype. It forever ends the min- ery services. And don’t forget fights throughout the years Network Co. (DNC) em- imum wage, the right to over- that these companies won’t here in California, mostly ployees, like Door Dash time, the right to meal and be satisfied with the workers when we are under attack drivers, are independent rest breaks, unemployment covered in Prop 22. Uber is from greedy anti-Union, an- contractors simply because benefits, workers comp, and already getting into the truck- on ti-worker interests. This year they are dispatched from every other important ben- ing business and Amazon is no different an app on a phone. They efit TNC and DNC drivers already uses DNC drivers. Proposition 22 brought to claim that these drivers are are entitled to and should If Prop 22 passes, our own us by tech billionaires goes entrepreneurs and want all be getting now. It also ends employers will be under tre- right to the heart of every the trappings of being in any chance of these workers mendous pressure to convert gain workers have made in a business for themselves. to join a Union, sealing their to this economic model. century or more. It not only Sound familiar? For Team- fate to be low wage workers Make no mistake, this strips workers of every right sters, it should. It’s exactly into the future. threat is real. Make sure you and benefit under the law, but what big business told the All of labor is united in oppo- are registered to vote and 22 also eliminates their ability to world when they convinced sition to Prop 22, but this fight vote NO on Prop 22! GROW Act: Round 1 Goes to Teamsters, Mack Says Western Conference of from financially healthy tions with politicians, their states Local Union political none making hundreds of Teamsters pension plan pension plans---like the key staffers and others coordinators, Joint Coun- phone calls, and sending Union chairman Chuck Western Conference--to about keeping an eye on cil Presidents, members emails and videos to these Mack reported last week prop up wobbly plans is GROW and other legisla- and retirees stepped up politicians.” that months of efforts to contained from moving tive boondoggles affecting when we asked them the Our concern, Mack said, prevent the GROW Act forward currently, Mack the plan.” last several months and it is what bills may be availa- from moving forward leg- said. “We’re not done by a was influential and felt in ble for folks looking around islatively have paid off. “Don’t get me wrong,” long shot, but we’re look- this fight. Of course, the to attach GROW too. GROW, a terrible feder- he said. “We are ever ing real good right now. Teamsters in Joint Council “We’re not done—al- al legislative effort to rob vigilant in communica- I must say the western 42 performed second to ways be ready,” Mack said. CHAIRMAN’S REPORT So. Cal. Food Contract Update By Lou Villalvazo, Negotiating Chairman Brothers and sisters, we’ve negotiating sessions with the and we intend to utilize all Union negotiating team is been in ongoing negotiations employers basically stone- the tools at our disposal to committed to negotiating a with both Ralphs/Kroger and walling, rejecting and asking achieve that goal. fair contract for our mem- Albertsons since August. As for takeaways. The Local Unions have bers. I write this, we are in the last Ralphs and Albertsons in- conducted informational up- Remember, it is going to few days before the con- vited a mediator from the date meetings and took strike take all of us working togeth- tracts are set to expire in Federal Mediation and Con- authorization votes over the er to achieve this goal. September. ciliation Service (FMCS) to past weeks. I want to thank If things went well then, we The Union’s negotiating join our negotiations to fa- all our members for partici- have a new contract that our committee submitted sever- cilitate progress. Over the pating in these meetings and members accepted. But if al comprehensive non-eco- past months of August and voting. We had the greatest we still don’t have a contract nomic proposals to the com- September the mediator has turnout in over 30 years and by the time you received panies. The proposals were been involved between both your vote was loud and clear. this edition, then more than based on the members’ parties and we have made I ask our members to be likely we are in the middle responses to the question- some progress on some is- patient, remain vigilant and of a fight. I ask all our mem- naires and feedback provid- sues. stand in solidarity with each bers in Joint Council 42 and ed to stewards and Union The mediator’s job is sim- other during this process. As throughout Southern Califor- representatives. ply to facilitate an agreement I write you, we are in the last nia, to be ready to support The Union proposed many and avoid a labor dispute. week prior to these contracts these sisters and brothers in things that affect our mem- The Union’s goal is to obtain expiring. their fight for a fair contract, bers at work daily. We have a fair contract that addresses Regardless of what hap- by participating in all the ac- conducted well over a dozen the membership’s concerns pens, rest assured that your tivities and actions. Nov. 3 In San Berdoo, It’s NO on U Endorsements San Bernardino County ty’s Fire Protection District on the ballot for voters in San California Teamsters have a primary (FPD). Bernardino FPD communi- Hawaii mission in the November 3 The infamously anti-work- ties. If passed, Measure U election---vote NO on Meas- er Howard Jarvis Taxpayers will result in over $40 million Nevada ure U. That’s the measure Assn., and a handful of local in cuts for emergency ser- —Are Inside— that would gut fire protection shadow groups, have suc- vices funding. This will be a and Union jobs in the coun- cessfully placed Measure U continued page 3 009091_Oct_01_2020_12pgs_03.indd 1 9/21/20 11:34 AM CALIFORNIA Teamster November 3 ENDORSEMENTS PROPOSITIONS U.S. Congress Commerce City Council West Hollywood Council Santa Ana Council 14 – Research bonds – No CD 8 Chris Bubser Oralia Rebollo John Erickson #1 Cynthia Contreras Recommendation CD 24 Salud Carbajal Covina Valley Schools Sepi Shyne #3 Mark McLoughlin 15 – Funding schools – YES CD 25 Christy Smith #3 Christopher Harris #5 Juan Villegas 16 – Affirmative action – YES IMPERIAL COUNTY CD 26 Julia Brownley Santa Ana School Bd. 17 – Parole amendment – No Cudahy Council El Centro Council CD 27 Judy Chu Oscar Reyes Recommendation CD 28 Adam Schiff Jose Gonzalez Jason Jackson Tustin Council 18 – California voting – No CD 31 Pete Aguilar El Monte HS District Bd. Recommendation CD 32 Grace Napolitano ORANGE COUNTY Letitia Clark Carlos Salcedo Supervisor 19 – Tax transfers – No Rec- CD 34 Jimmy Gomez Tustin School Bd. El Monte Mayor, Council #1 Sergio Contreras ommendation CD 35 Norma Torres #1 Allyson Damikolas 20 – Parole restrictions – No CD 38 Linda Sanchez No endorsements Municipal Water Dist. O.C. Recommendation CD 39 Gil Cisneros Gardena Council #3 Tyler Diep RIVERSIDE COUNTY 21 – Rent control – No Rec- CD 40 Lucille Roybal-Allard Mark Henderson #4 Stacy Taylor Indio Council ommendation CD 41 Mark Takano O.C. Water Dist. #1 Erin Teran 22 - Job classification – NO CD 43 Maxine Waters Glendale Council Riverside Unified School 23 – Dialysis clinics – YES At-large Dan Brotman #6 Cathy Green CD 44 Nanette Barragan Bd. 24 – Privacy law – No Recom- CD 45 Katie Porter Anaheim Council Hacienda-La Puente #3 Angelov Farooq mendation CD 46 Lou Correa Schools #4 Avelino Vasquez #4 Darlene Trujillo-Elliott 25 – Bail - YES CD 47 Alan Lowenthal #1 Taro O’Sullivan #5 Steve Faessel Temecula Council State Assembly CD 48 Harley Rouda Hawaiian Gardens Council Brea-Olinda School Bd. CD 49 Mike Levin No endorsements AD 35 Dawn Addis Francisco Noyola #2 Keri Kropke AD 39 Luz Maria Rivas CD 50 Ammar Campa-Najjar SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Reynaldo Rodriguez Buena Park Council AD 40 James Ramos CD 51 Juan Vargas Measure K Vote NO Hawthorne Mayor #3 Susan Sonne AD 41 Chris Holden CD 52 Scott Peters Measure U Vote NO AD 43 Laura Friedman CD 53 Sara Jacobs Haidar Awad #4 Art Brown Supervisor AD 44 Jacqui Irwin LOS ANGELES COUNTY Long Beach Council Centralia School Bd. AD 45 Jesse Gabriel #5 Joe Baca Jr. District Attorney #2 Cindy Allen #4 Lamiya Hoque AD 46 Adrin Nazarian Colton Council Jackie Lacey #6 Suely Saro Costa Mesa Council AD 47 Eloise Reyes #8 Al Austin John Echevarria AD 48 Blanca Rubio Supervisor #2 Loren Gameros Needles Mayor AD 49 Ed Chau #2 Herb Wesson Long Beach Comm.