Nesting Success and Behavior of Northern Harriers on a Reclaimed Surface Mine Grassland in Kentucky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nesting Success and Behavior of Northern Harriers on a Reclaimed Surface Mine Grassland in Kentucky J. Raptor Res. 40(3):210–216 E 2006 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. NESTING SUCCESS AND BEHAVIOR OF NORTHERN HARRIERS ON A RECLAIMED SURFACE MINE GRASSLAND IN KENTUCKY MARK VUKOVICH1 AND GARY RITCHISON2 Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475 U.S.A. ABSTRACT.—Grasslands are among the most threatened habitats in North America and populations of many grassland birds, including Northern Harriers (Circus cyaneus), are declining. While native grasslands are disappearing, current procedures for reclaiming surface mines have produced large areas of grasslands in the eastern United States. Currently, little is known about the use of such grasslands by raptors. The objective of this study was to examine the nesting behavior of Northern Harriers on a reclaimed surface mine grassland in Kentucky. Over two breeding seasons (April–July 2002–03), 46 harrier nests were located, and young fledged from 10 (21.7%) of these nests. All but one nest were located in dry, upland areas, and the increased vulnerability of nests in such sites to predation may have contributed to this relatively low nesting success. Successful nests were located in denser vegetation than unsuccessful nests, suggesting that greater concealment may reduce predation risk. The percentage of breeding females that were subadults (44.4%) was higher in this Kentucky population than reported elsewhere, although nest success did not differ with female age. Most prey items delivered to nestlings were small mammals (134 of 139; 96.4%), with male harriers capturing most prey and, in aerial exchanges, transferring those prey to females for delivery to the nest. These results suggest that Northern Harriers can breed successfully on reclaimed surface mine grasslands. KEY WORDS: Northern Harrier ; Circus cyaneus; Kentucky; nest success; provisioning; reclaimed surface mine grass- land. E´ XITO DE NIDIFICACIO´ N Y COMPORTAMIENTO DE CIRCUS CYANEUS EN PASTIZALES RECUPE- RADOS DE MINERI´A DE SUPERFICIE EN KENTUCKY RESUMEN.—Los pastizales son uno de los ha´bitats ma´s amenazados en Norteame´rica y las poblaciones de muchas aves de pastizal, incluyendo a Circus cyaneus,esta´n disminuyendo. Mientras que los pastizales nativos esta´n disminuyendo, las pra´cticas actuales de recuperacio´n de a´reas dedicadas a la minerı´a de superficie han producido una gran cantidad de pastizales en el este de Estados Unidos. Actualmente, se sabe muy poco acerca del uso de estos pastizales por aves rapaces. El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar el comportamiento de nidificacio´n de C. cyaneus en un pastizal recuperado de minerı´a de superficie en Kentucky. Durante dos e´pocas reproductivas (abril–julio de 2002 y 2003), se localizaron 46 nidosdeC. cyaneus, de los cuales 10 emplumaron juveniles (21.7%). A excepcio´n de un nido, todos los nidos estu- vieron localizados en tierras altas y secas La mayor vulnerabilidad de los nidos ante depredadores puede haber contribuido al e´xito de nidificacio´n relativamente bajo en estos sitios. Los nidos exitosos estuvieron localizados en vegetacio´n ma´s densa que los nidos no exitosos, lo que sugiere que una mayor cobertura del nido reduce el riesgo de depredacio´n. El porcentaje de hembras reproductivas subadultas (44.4%) fue mayor en esta poblacio´n de Kentucky que el reportado para otras poblaciones, a pesar de que el e´xito de nidificacio´n no vario´ con la edad de las hembras. La mayorı´a de los´tems ı presa llevados a los nidos correspondieron a pequen˜os mamı´feros (134 de 139; 96.4%). Los machos capturaron la mayorı´a de las presas transfirie´ndolas en el aire a las hembras, las cuales posteriormente llevaron las presas a los nidos. Estos resultados sugieren que C. cyaneus puede reproducirse exitosamente en pastizales recuperados de minerı´a de superficie. [Traduccio´n del equipo editorial] 1 Present address: Southern Research Station, Forest Wetlands Research Group, U.S. Forest Service, Savannah River, P.O. Box 700, Building 760-1G, New Ellenton, SC 29809 U.S.A. 2 Corresponding author. Email address: [email protected] 210 SEPTEMBER 2006 HARRIERS ON RECLAIMED GRASSLAND 211 Grasslands are among the most threatened habi- dogbane (Apocynum sp.), Indian currant (Symphoricarpos tats in North America (Jones and Bock 2002), and orbiculatus), and blackberry (Rubus sp.). Because we did not capture and mark Northern Har- populations of many grassland birds are declining at riers on the PWMA, the number of breeding individuals rates exceeding those of forest species (Herkert in the population could only be estimated. One adult male 1994). Populations of Northern Harriers (Circus cy- in 2002 was known to be polygynous because he was ob- aneus) appear to be declining globally (del Hoyo et served flying between two nest sites. In addition, based on timing and location of nests, we were relatively certain that al. 1995), and harriers are a species of management some pairs that lost nests to predators or abandoned nests concern over much of their range in the United were the same ones that subsequently initiated new nests. States (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987). Avail- However, in other cases, it was not clear whether nests were able data suggest that the loss and fragmentation of initiated by the same pair that had earlier lost a nest in the grassland habitat have been important factors in same general area or by a new pair. The ages of Northern Harriers in our study were cate- this decline (Serrentino 1992). gorized as either adult or subadult. Eye color was used to Although few native grasslands remain, current categorize each harrier, with adults having yellow irises and reclamation procedures for surface mines have con- subadults having darker irises (brown, gray, or light gray- verted large areas of upland forest and farmland to brown; Clark and Wheeler 1987). Because it takes from 2– 6 yr for iris color to become completely yellow (Clark and grasslands in Kentucky and elsewhere in the eastern Wheeler 1987), the exact ages of harriers in our study were United States (Peterjohn and Rice 1991, Palmer- unknown. Ball 1996, Rohrbaugh and Yahner 1996). Northern We located nests by observing the behavior of adults Harriers are known to use these reclaimed grass- (e.g., prey exchanges). Once located, nests were moni- lands during both the nonbreeding and breeding tored to determine clutch sizes, number of nestlings, and nest outcome. To minimize disturbance, we checked nests seasons. For example, Northern Harriers were infrequently (every 7–14 d) and the status of nests was found nesting on reclaimed surface mines in south- often determined by observing the behavior of adults. Nest ern Indiana in the 1970s (Palmer-Ball 1996), and contents were often viewed using a telescoping pole (ca. harrier nests were first documented on reclaimed 5 m long) with an attached mirror. Nestlings were already present when some nests were located and, because pre- surface mines in Kentucky in 1989 (Palmer-Ball dators may have taken one or more eggs or nestlings, those and Barron 1990). Northern Harriers have also nests were not used when determining mean clutch sizes been reported nesting on reclaimed grasslands in or comparing clutch sizes of adult and subadult females. Ohio (Peterjohn and Rice 1991) and Pennsylvania Provisioning rates were determined by watching harriers (Rohrbaugh and Yahner 1996). from a distance ($50 m) or from inside an observation blind ($20 m) to minimize disturbance. The size of prey Although Northern Harriers are known to use delivered to nestlings by adult harriers was estimated by reclaimed surface mines during the breeding sea- comparing the length of prey items to that of the harriers’ son, little is known about the harriers’ abundance bill (bill range 5 16.1–19.3 mm [MacWhirter and Bild- or about the suitability of these areas for breeding stein 1996]; we used 17.5 mm as the typical bill length). Within 4 d after nests failed or young fledged, we char- (Rohrbaugh and Yahner 1996). MacWhirter and acterized nest-site vegetation using methods described by Bildstein (1996) suggested that efforts were needed James and Shugart (1970). In addition, we randomly se- to better document the breeding range of Northern lected and characterized the vegetation at paired sites Harriers, and to monitor populations at the perim- where no nesting occurred. Random sites were identified eter of their range. The objective of our study was to either using a grid map and random number table or by choosing a random number or angle and measuring 25 m examine nest-site selection, provisioning behavior, from the nest site. At both nest sites and randomly-selected and reproductive success of breeding Northern Har- sites, vegetation within an 11.3-m radius (0.04 ha) of the riers on a reclaimed surface mine in west-central plot center was characterized. Within these plots, we Kentucky. counted the number of shrubs, the number of trees ,8 cm diameter breast height (DBH), and the number of trees .8 cm DBH. In addition, four transects extending STUDY AREA AND METHODS from the plot center in the four cardinal directions were From April–August 2002 and 2003, we attempted to lo- established and, at 2.25-m intervals along each transect as cate all Northern Harrier nests on the Peabody Wildlife well as at the plot center, we measured litter depth and Management Area (PWMA), an area with six separate man- maximum foliage height, and noted the type of ground agement units encompassing 25 000 ha of reclaimed coal cover (bare ground, grass, herbaceous, or shrub). At these mine land in Muhlenberg and Ohio counties in west-cen- same points, we also determined foliage cover at three tral Kentucky. The open areas of the PWMA consisted height intervals (,0.5 m, 0.5–1 m, and .1 m) by counting primarily of nonnative vegetation, including sericea (Les- the number of stems within 4 cm of a 2-cm diameter pole.
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Ireland Hen Harrier Survey 2010
    Republic of Ireland Hen Harrier Survey 2010 Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 59 Republic of Ireland National Hen Harrier Survey 2010 Ruddock, M.,1 Dunlop, B.J.,1 O’Toole, L.,1, 2 Mee, A.,1, 2 & Nagle, T.2 In collaboration with Lyden, J.,2 Clarke, D.J.,2 O’Donoghue, B.G.,3 Wilson, M.W.,4 Oliver, G.A.,3, 4 McGeough, C.,2 Lusby, J.,5 Monaghan, J.,3 Porter, B.,5 O’Mahony, B.,4 Troake, P.,4 Norriss, D.,3 & Tierney, D.3 1 Golden Eagle Trust Ltd, 22 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2 www.goldeneagle.ie 2 Irish Raptor Study Group c/o Direen, Black Valley, Kerry 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government, 7 Ely Place, Dublin 2 www.npws.ie 4 Department of Zoology, Ecology & Plant Science, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Co. Cork www.ucc.ie 5 Birdwatch Ireland, Midlands Office, Crank House, Banagher, Co. Offaly www.birdwatchireland.ie 6 Contact Nature, 4 Kent Terrace, Barnhill, Dalkey, Co. Dublin Citation: Ruddock, M. & Dunlop, B.J., O’Toole, L., Mee, A., Nagle, T. (2012) Republic of Ireland National Hen Harrier Survey 2010. Irish Wildlife Manual, No. 59. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland. Keywords: hen harrier, circus cyaneus, national survey, population estimate, habitat change, forestry, windfarms, disturbance, upland, heather moorland, burning, Special Protection Area (SPA), demography. Site list: 004160; 004161; 004162; 004165; 004167; 004168 Cover photos: Adult female hen harrier © M. Ruddock The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: David Norriss Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: N.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrier References
    Introduction This is the final version of the Harrier's list, no further updates will be made. Grateful thanks to Wietze Janse and Tom Shevlin (www.irishbirds.ie) for the cover images and all those who responded with constructive feedback. All images © the photographers. Please note that this and other Reference Lists I have compiled are not exhaustive and are best employed in conjunction with other sources. Joe Hobbs Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithologists' Union World Bird List (Gill, F. & Donsker, D. (eds.) 2019. IOC World Bird List. Available from: https://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [version 9.1 accessed January 2019]). Final Version Version 1.4 (January 2019). Cover Main image: Western Marsh Harrier. Zevenhoven, Groene Jonker, Netherlands. 3rd May 2011. Picture by Wietze Janse. Vignette: Montagu’s Harrier. Great Saltee Island, Co. Wexford, Ireland. 10th May 2008. Picture by Tom Shevlin. Species Page No. African Marsh Harrier [Circus ranivorus] 8 Black Harrier [Circus maurus] 10 Cinereous Harrier [Circus cinereus] 17 Eastern Marsh Harrier [Circus spilonotus] 6 Hen Harrier [Circus cyaneus] 11 Long-winged Harrier [Circus buffoni] 9 Malagasy Harrier [Circus macrosceles] 9 Montagu's Harrier [Circus pygargus] 20 Northern Harrier [Circus hudsonius] 16 Pallid Harrier [Circus macrourus] 18 Papuan Harrier [Circus spilothorax] 7 Pied Harrier [Circus melanoleucos] 20 Réunion Harrier [Circus maillardi] 9 Spotted Harrier [Circus assimilis] 9 Swamp Harrier [Circus approximans] 7 Western Marsh Harrier [Circus aeruginosus] 4 1 Relevant Publications Balmer, D. et al. 2013. Bird Atlas 2001-11: The breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. BTO Books, Thetford. Beaman, M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Vertebrate Predator Community in North-Eastern Belarus Before and After Naturalization of the American Mink and Raccoon Dog
    Folia Zool. – 57(4): 373–391 (2008) The structure of vertebrate predator community in north-eastern Belarus before and after naturalization of the American mink and raccoon dog Vadim E. SIDOROVICH*, Anna A. SIDOROVICH, Vladimir V. IVANOVSKIJ, Mihail M. PIKULIK and Elena P. SHINKEVICH The Vertebrate Predation Research Group, Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Akademicheskaya str. 27, Minsk – 220072, Belarus; e-mail: [email protected] Received 10 August 2007; Accepted 23 June 2008 Abstract. The structure of the vertebrate predator community in north-eastern Belarus has been examined before and after naturalization of the American mink and raccoon dog. Species composition of the community, population density and biomass, portion of each species in the pooled community density and biomass, species body mass and size structure of the community were investigated. The community consisted of 36 native predator species, and 11 other predator species were sporadically registered in the area in both periods before the American mink and raccoon dog expansion and after the introduced species have reached a high population density. Separating predator species into four size groups, we found that in terms of total density the largest portion of the community belonged to small predators, while large predators formed the smallest portion. In terms of total biomass, the larger medium-sized predator group predominated over other size groups. Despite decline in the populations of ten native predator species, the total community density and biomass as well as portions of different size groups appeared to be very similar before and after naturalization of the introduced predator species.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of Long&Hyphen;Winged Harrier &Lpar;<I>Circus Buffoni</I>&Rpar; In
    j. RaptorRes. 30(4):237-239 ¸ 1996 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. DIET OF LONG-WINGEDHARRIER (CIRCUSBUFFONI) IN SOUTHEASTERN BUENOS AIRES PROVINCE, ARGENTINA MAid• S. BO, S•d'4D• M. CICCHINO, AND MARIANO M. MARTiNEZ Departamentode Biologia,Facultad de CiendasExactas y Naturales,Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes3350-(7600) Mar delPlata, Argentina Key Words: Circus buffoni; long-wingedharrier, diet;, t'ro- hair, dentaries and exoskeletons,and compared with phic nichebreadth; Argentina. specimensin collectionsof Museo de CienciasNaturales de La Plata, Museo de Ciencias Naturales "Lorenzo Scag- The long-wingedharrier (Circusbuffoni) is widespread lia" de Mar del Plata and Laboratorio de Vertebrados, in South America ranging from Venezuela to Chubut Facultad de CienciasExactas y Naturales-UniversidadNa- cional de Mar del Plata. All remains in a collection were Provincein Argentina, occasionallyreaching as far south as Tierra del Fuego (Nores and Yzurieta 1980) and cen- lumped and prey items were identified using known rem- tral Chile (del Hoyo et al. 1994). Found throughout Ar- iges,rectrices, bills and bonesof birds and fur, skull parts gentina in open fields,grasslands, savannas, marshes, wet- and feet of mammals.This procedureminimized the pos- lands and ponds from sea level to 690 m elevation(Ca- sibility of overcounting numbers of individuals of each nevari et al. 1991, De la Pefia 1992, del Hoyo et al. 1994), species(Reynolds and Meslow 1984, Marti 1987). Most it is most abundant in the Chaco-Pampeanzone of Ar- prey were identified to the specieslevel. gentina, Uruguay and Brazil (Grossman and Hamlet Adult bird and mammal weights were obtained from the literature (Fiora 1933, De la Pefia 1987, Salvador 1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Eared Owls in New Jersey
    j RaptorRes. 23(4):162-166 ¸ 1989 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. OBSERVATIONS ON THE EVENING DEPARTURE AND ACTIVITY OF WINTERING SHORT-EARED OWLS IN NEW JERSEY THOMAS BOSAKOWSKI ABSTR^CT.--WinteringShort-eared Owls (Asioflammeus) were primarily crepuscularand nocturnal. Roostdeparture occurred most frequently after sunset(83%) with mostexceptions occurring on heavily overcastdays. Owls usually departed singly or in tandemand engaged in a steadydirect flight, presumably to a predeterminedhunting area. Hunting was rarely initiatednear the roostsite. Night observations up to 5 hr after sunsetrevealed that owls huntedcontinuously into the night and were not merely crepuscular.Despite their reputationas an on-the-wingpredator, extended periods of perch-huntingwere oftenobserved after sunset,particularly on windlessnights. Active hunting from percheswas evidenced by a continualseries of pouncesand huntingflights that werelaunched from the sameor nearbyperches. Owls respondedon 3 of 5 trials to broadcastsof prerecordedShort-eared Owl calls with vocalizations and/or vigorouscircling flights over the calling station. The Short-earedOwl (Asioflarnrneus)is primarily and Central North America, Peterson Field Guide Series nocturnalduring the winter months,and hencerel- Record,Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston)at known Short- eared Owl locations for at least 8 min. Taped calls were ativelyfew attemptshave been made to studyactivity broadcastat full volume with a portable 7 watt-output patternsand behaviorof the specieson wintering cassettetape-recorder placed on the roofof a parkedvehicle grounds(e.g., Short and Drew 1962; Clark 1975; with observers inside. Marr and McWhirter 1982). In this paper I present information on evening roost departure, social in- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION teractionsand hunting activitiesof wintering Short- Evening Departure. Short-eared Owls were eared Owls in New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern England Raptor Forum
    Northern England Raptor Forum This edition of the Annual Review is dedicated to the memory of Mick Carroll 1947-2015 Founder of the South Ryedale and East Yorkshire Raptor Study Group Annual Review 2014 1 Contents Acknowledgements Inside Front Cover Photograph credits 3 Useful telephone numbers 3 Foreword 4 Chairman‟s Report 5 Secretary‟s Report 8 Geographical coverage 10 NERF 2014 Annual Review 13 Habitat breakdown 13 Species monitoring 14 Persecution 15 Black hole species 16 Summary 17 Combined statistics 18 Species Reports Editor‟s Note 19 Buzzard, Common Buteo buteo 47 Buzzard, Honey Pernis apivorus 20 Goshawk, Northern Accipiter gentilis 40 Harrier, Hen Circus cyaneus 32 Harrier, Montagu‟s Circus pygargus 38 Harrier, Marsh Circus aeruginosus 28 Hobby Falco subbuteo 84 Kestrel, Common Falco tinnunculus 76 Merlin Falco columbarius 80 Osprey Pandion haliaetus 51 Owl, Barn Tyto alba 54 Owl, Eurasian Eagle Bubo bubo 59 Owl, Little Athene noctua 62 Owl, Long-eared Asio otus 69 Owl, Short-eared Asio flammeus 72 Owl, Tawny Strix aluco 65 Peregrine Falco peregrinus 88 Red Kite Milvus milvus 23 Sparrowhawk, Eurasian Accipiter nisus 44 Raven, Common Corvus corax 94 Species Reports from non-NERF members 97 Conference 2014: summary of speaker presentations 101 Obituary: Mick Carroll 105 Appendices 1. Combined NERF monitoring data 109 2. Combined productivity graphs 110 3. Ring recoveries 112 4. List of acronyms 114 NERF Group contacts Inside back cover 2 Photograph credits Honey Buzzard: Garry Marchant Red Kite: Ivan Ellison Marsh Harrier: Ivan Ellison Hen Harrier: Mike Price Montagu‟s Harrier: Ivan Ellison Northern Goshawk: Ivan Ellison Sparrowhawk: Adrian Dancy Buzzard: Ken Smith Osprey: Ivan Ellison Common Kestrel: Adrian Dancy Merlin: Wilf Norman Hobby: Susan H.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Determination in the Western Marsh Harrier (Circus Aeruginosus ) Using Morphometrics and Discriminant Analysis
    J. Raptor Res. 40(1):000–000 E 2006 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. GENDER DETERMINATION IN THE WESTERN MARSH HARRIER (CIRCUS AERUGINOSUS ) USING MORPHOMETRICS AND DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS CHRISTIAN BAVOUX Le Marais aux Oiseaux, Les Grissotie`res, 17550 Dolus-d’Ole´ron, France GUY BURNELEAU 2, rue du Port de Chiffeu, Mauzac, 17320 Saint-Just-Luzac, France VINCENT BRETAGNOLLE1 Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chize´, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 79360 Beauvoir-sur-Niort, France ABSTRACT.—When adult, the gender of Western Marsh Harriers (Circus aeruginosus) are determined on the basis of the presence of gray feathers on the wing and on the tail in the males. However, males of this species in southwestern France have female-like plumages, lacking gray feathers, and thus, gender determination is impossible by using coloration alone. We investigated sex determination using biometric parameters in a study site located in southwestern France. From one to six measurements (body mass, bill length, wing chord length, tarsus length and width, and tail length) were taken from 243 marsh harriers of known gender (156 males and 87 females), marked in the study site, and subsequently re-sighted. Additionally, 30 marsh harriers specimens were measured by two observers to establish within and between observer repeatability values, as well as within bird repeatability for the six biometric parameters. Using quadratic Discriminant Analysis, we showed that it was possible to sex individuals of this species with .99% accuracy on the basis of only two parameters: bill length and body mass. Actually, using bill length alone provides very good indication of gender (accuracy .
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Illegal Killing and Taking of Birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus
    Review of illegal killing and taking of birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus Overview of main outputs of the project The information collated and analysed during this project has been summarised in a variety of outputs: 1. This full report Presenting all the aspects of the project at regional and national levels http://www.birdlife.org/illegal-killing 2. Scientific paper Presenting results of the regional assessment of scope and scale of illegal killing and taking of birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus1 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bird-conservation-international 3. Legislation country factsheets Presenting a review of national legislation on hunting, trapping and trading of birds in each assessed country http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/country (under ‘resources’ tab) 4. ‘The Killing 2.0’ Layman’s report Short communications publication for publicity purposes with some key headlines of the results of the project and the previous one focussing on the Mediterranean region http://www.birdlife.org/illegal-killing Credits of front cover pictures 1 2 3 4 1 Hen harrier Circus cyaneus © RSPB 2 Illegal trapping of Hen Harrier in the UK © RSPB 3 Common Coot (Fulica atra) © MISIK 4 Illegal trade of waterbirds illegally killed in Azerbaijan © AOS Citation of the report BirdLife International (2017) Review of illegal killing and taking of birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. 1 Paper in revision process for publication in Bird Conservation International in October 2017 when this report is released 1 Executive Summary The illegal killing and taking of wild birds remains a major threat on a global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Raptor Densities and Habitat Use in Kansas Cropland and Rangeland Ecosystems
    j. RaptorRes. 34(3):203-209 ¸ 2000 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. A COMPARISON OF RAPTOR DENSITIES AND HABITAT USE IN KANSAS CROPLAND AND RANGELAND ECOSYSTEMS CHRISTOPHER K. WILLIAMS Departmentof WildlifeEcology, University of Wisconsin,Russell Labs, 1630 LindenDrive, Madison, WI 53706-1598 U.S.A. ROGER D. APPLEGATE Departmentof Wildlifeand Parks,Research and SurveyOffice, P.O. Box 1525, Emporia,KS 66801-1525 U.S.A. R. SCOTT LUTZ AND DONALD H. RUSCH Departmentof WildlifeEcology, University of Wisconsin,Russell Labs, 1630 LindenDrive, Madison, WI 53706-1598 U.S.A. ABSTRACT.--Wecounted raptors on line transectsalong roads to assessdensities, species diversity, and habitat selection of winter raptors between cropland and rangeland habitats in eastern Kansas.We conductedcounts every 2 wk betweenSeptember-March 1994-98. Speciesdiversity indices did not differ between the two habitats (P -- 0.15). We calculateddensity estimates and cover type selectionfor Red- tailed Hawks (Buteojamaicensis),Northern Harriers (Circuscyaneus), and American Kestrels(Falco sparv- erius).Red-tailed Hawks and Northern Harrier densitieswere higher in cropland, while kestreldensities did not differ betweenthe two habitats.All three speciesacross both habitatshad a general preference for idleland habitat. We believe three factors could explain the higher raptor densitiesin cropland: increasedprey abundance,increased visibility of prey associatedwith harvestedagriculture fields, and/ or a higher relative amount of preferred hunting habitat. K•¾WORDS: NorthernHarri•
    [Show full text]
  • Masters of the Air (PDF)
    What are birds of prey? Birds of prey, or raptors, are amazing animals. They have large eyes that face forward, powerful talons and a hooked beak. Their food includes amphibians, birds, insects, mammals and reptiles. Scientists recognize eight major groups of birds as “birds of prey.” Buteos (large hawks) fly on wide, slow-beating wings which allow them to soar and search for prey. The short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) is endangered in They perch on tree limbs and fence or telephone posts. Illinois. It is a rare winter and summer resident in marshes, meadows, fields and parks. This owl has Accipters (true hawks) have a long tail (like a rudder) and short rounded wings. When flying, they very small ear tufts and a golden-brown body with make several quick wing beats and then glide. True hawks are aggressive and very quick. dark marks on its chest, belly and back. Dark rings circle the owl’s bright yellow eyes. It is 13-17 inches Ospreys can be recognized by wings that appear to be “bent,” or angled, when they fly. Found near long and has a wingspan of 38-44 inches. The large bodies of water, they dive feet-first to catch fishes. short-eared owl feeds on rodents, insects and Falcons have long, thin, pointed wings, a short bill and a streamlined body. They can fly very fast. small birds during the late afternoon and early evening. It is known to play dead when Eagles are larger than hawks and have longer wings. Their bill is almost as long as their head.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Wildlife Action Plan Appendix 1
    IOWA WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN APPENDIX 1 - APPENDIX 21 187 APPENDIX 1 . The IWAP - A Plan to Plan Planning Schedule The target date for a final review draft of a State Comprehensive Wildlife Plan for Iowa is June 1, 2005. Meeting this deadline will allow for adequate review and approval by the Director and the Natural Resource Commission prior to the September 20, 2005 deadline. Developing a more detailed planning schedule will be one of the first tasks of the steering committee in coordination with the plan author. Plan Contributors Plan Director – Richard Bishop – Iowa DNR Responsibilities 1) Participate in committee meetings 2) Review all drafts of the plan 3) Approve all press releases and plan marketing plans 4) Review and communicate progress to Division Administrator, Director and NRC commissioners Plan Coordinator – Terry Little, Iowa DNR Responsibilities 1) Assemble Steering Committee 2) Participate in all committees 3) Identify and contract with a meeting facilitator 4) Identify and contract with plan author 5) Coordinate review and editing of all drafts of the plan 6) Coordinate all press releases and plan marketing 7) Report progress, problems and other developments to DNR administrators Steering Committee Chair – Doug Harr, Iowa DNR Responsibilities 1) Convene and coordinate all steering committee meetings 2) Keep steering members and sub-committees focused, on task and on schedule 3) Consult with coordinator and committee members to solve problems 4) Plan, schedule and coordinate advisory committee meetings Steering Committee Members – Key representatives from Iowa’s conservation professionals 1) Dale Garner (DNR): a. 2003-04: Coordination with Federal plans (PPJV, etc.) b.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Superior Raptor Monitoring 2019 Summary
    Town of Superior Raptor Monitoring 2019 Summary Sponsored by the Open Space Advisory Committee Introduction: In late 2018, the Town of Superior Open Space Advisory Committee initiated a program to monitor the presence and activity of raptors (eagles, hawks, falcons, and owls) in and near Superior. The program has several goals: determining what raptor species are present in Superior, learning what areas raptors use at different times of the year, monitoring any nesting activity, working to prevent unnecessary disturbance to raptors, identifying habitats to protect, and providing relevant education to the Town’s residents. Nine volunteer observers, all Superior residents, monitored seven general locations approximately weekly during the 2019 nesting season and identified eight species of raptors in the target areas. Some of these species use open spaces in Superior only intermittently, for hunting or migration. However, monitors determined that four species nested in or adjacent to Superior in 2019; ten nests were located and at least nine of them produced fledglings. The nesting species were Great Horned Owl, Red-tailed Hawk, Cooper’s Hawk, and American Kestrel. Background: Southeast Boulder County, and especially the prairie dog colonies along Rock Creek west of Hwy 36, historically supported significant densities of several raptor species, especially during winter. As late as the mid-1980s, winter bird counts showed that our area had one of the highest populations of Ferruginous Hawks in the entire U.S. [3,4]. With the loss of open space due to increasing development in the 1990s and the additional reduction of prairie dogs due to intermittent plague epidemics, populations of large open-country raptors in Figure 1 - Cooper's Hawk by Barbara Pennell and near Superior declined precipitously [2].
    [Show full text]