Download HBG Holmes Trillium Collection PCN Update 12-21-18.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. -
Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus. -
Shiloh National Military Park Natural Resource Condition Assessment
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Shiloh National Military Park Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/SHIL/NRR—2017/1387 ON THE COVER Bridge over the Shiloh Branch in SHIL. Photo courtesy of Robert Bird. Shiloh National Military Park Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/SHIL/NRR—2017/1387 Andy J. Nadeau Kevin Benck Kathy Allen Hannah Hutchins Anna Davis Andrew Robertson GeoSpatial Services Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 890 Prairie Island Road Winona, Minnesota 55987 February 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. -
Norsk Botanisk Forenings Tidsskrift Journal of the Norwegian Botanical Society
NORSK BOTANISK FORENINGS TIDSSKRIFT JOURNAL OF THE NORWEGIAN BOTANICAL SOCIETY ÅRGANG 77 BLYTTIA ISSN 0006-5269 1/2019 http://www.nhm.uio.no/botanisk/nbf/blyttia/ I DETTE NUMMER: BLYTTIANORSK BOTANISK Nytt år, ny vår, nytt Blyttia. Et forhåpentligvis vel- FORENINGS balansert blad har funnet veien til dine hender. Som TIDSSKRIFT vanlig har vi en blanding av nyheter fra Norsk Botanisk Forenings arbeid og aktiviteter, inspirerende små biter «skoleringsstoff» og fire klassiske artikler i «Norges Redaktør: Jan Wesenberg. I redaksjonen: Leif Galten, Botaniske Annaler». Hanne Hegre, Klaus Høiland, Mats G Nettelbladt, Kristin Vigander. Denne gangen markerer vi professor Rolf Y. Berg, Postadresse: Blyttia, Naturhistorisk museum, postboks som døde i fjor, med en in- 1172 Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo. teressant artikkel om Bergs Telefon: 90888683 (redaktøren). forskning i grenselandet sys- Faks: Bromus s.lat. spp. tematikk/spredningsbiologi/ E-mail: [email protected]. anatomi. Se artikkel av Inger Hjemmeside: http://www.nhm.uio.no/botanisk/nbf/blyttia/. Nordal m.fl. på s. 35. Blyttia er grunnlagt i 1943, og har sitt navn etter to sentrale norske botanikere på 1800-tallet, Mathias Numsen Blytt (1789–1862) og Axel Blytt (1843–1898). En gjennomgang av situa- © Norsk Botanisk Forening. ISSN 0006-5269. sjonen med fremmedarter Sats: Blyttia-redaksjonen. i kystkommeunen Selje får Trykk og ferdiggjøring: ETN Porsgrunn. vi av Ingvild Austad og Leif Utsending: GREP Grenland AS. Hauge på s. 49. Både proble- Ettertrykk fra Blyttia er tillatt såfremt kilde oppgis. Ved marter kjent over mye av lan- ettertrykk av enkeltbilder og tegninger må det innhentes det og relative nykomlinger, tillatelse fra fotograf/tegner på forhånd. -
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category -
Illinois Native Plant Society 2019 Plant List Herbaceous Plants
Illinois Native Plant Society 2019 Plant List Plant Sale: Saturday, May 11, 9:00am – 1:00pm Illinois State Fairgrounds Commodity Pavilion (Across from Grandstand) Herbaceous Plants Scientific Name Common Name Description Growing Conditions Comment Dry to moist, Sun to part Blooms mid-late summer Butterfly, bee. Agastache foeniculum Anise Hyssop 2-4', Lavender to purple flowers shade AKA Blue Giant Hyssop Allium cernuum var. Moist to dry, Sun to part Nodding Onion 12-18", Showy white flowers Blooms mid summer Bee. Mammals avoid cernuum shade 18", White flowers after leaves die Allium tricoccum Ramp (Wild Leek) Moist, Shade Blooms summer Bee. Edible back Moist to dry, Part shade to Blooms late spring-early summer Aquilegia canadensis Red Columbine 30", Scarlet and yellow flowers shade Hummingbird, bee Moist to wet, Part to full Blooms late spring-early summer Showy red Arisaema dracontium Green Dragon 1-3', Narrow greenish spadix shade fruits. Mammals avoid 1-2', Green-purple spadix, striped Moist to wet, Part to full Blooms mid-late spring Showy red fruits. Arisaema triphyllum Jack-in-the-Pulpit inside shade Mammals avoid Wet to moist, Part shade to Blooms late spring-early summer Bee. AKA Aruncus dioicus Goatsbeard 2-4', White fluffy panicles in spring shade Brides Feathers Wet to moist, Light to full Blooms mid-late spring Mammals avoid. Asarum canadense Canadian Wildginger 6-12", Purplish brown flowers shade Attractive groundcover 3-5', White flowers with Moist, Dappled sun to part Blooms summer Monarch larval food. Bee, Asclepias exaltata Poke Milkweed purple/green tint shade butterfly. Uncommon Blooms mid-late summer Monarch larval Asclepias hirtella (Tall) Green Milkweed To 3', Showy white flowers Dry to moist, Sun food. -
The Natural Communities of South Carolina
THE NATURAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTH CAROLINA BY JOHN B. NELSON SOUTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE & MARINE RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 1986 INTRODUCTION The maintenance of an accurate inventory of a region's natural resources must involve a system for classifying its natural communities. These communities themselves represent identifiable units which, like individual plant and animal species of concern, contribute to the overall natural diversity characterizing a given region. This classification has developed from a need to define more accurately the range of natural habitats within South Carolina. From the standpoint of the South Carolina Nongame and Heritage Trust Program, the conceptual range of natural diversity in the state does indeed depend on knowledge of individual community types. Additionally, it is recognized that the various plant and animal species of concern (which make up a significant remainder of our state's natural diversity) are often restricted to single natural communities or to a number of separate, related ones. In some cases, the occurrence of a given natural community allows us to predict, with some confidence, the presence of specialized or endemic resident species. It follows that a reasonable and convenient method of handling the diversity of species within South Carolina is through the concept of these species as residents of a range of natural communities. Ideally, a nationwide classification system could be developed and then used by all the states. Since adjacent states usually share a number of community types, and yet may each harbor some that are unique, any classification scheme on a national scale would be forced to recognize the variation in a given community from state to state (or region to region) and at the same time to maintain unique communities as distinctive. -
Theo Witsell Botanical Report on Lake Atalanta Park November 2013
A Rapid Terrestrial Ecological Assessment of Lake Atalanta Park, City of Rogers, Benton County, Arkansas Prairie grasses including big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), and side‐oats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula) thrive in a southwest‐facing limestone glade overlooking Lake Atalanta. This area, on a steep hillside east of the Lake Atalanta dam, contains some of the highest quality natural communities remaining in the park. By Theo Witsell Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission November 30, 2013 CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Background and History ................................................................................................................................ 3 Site Description ............................................................................................................................................. 4 General Description .................................................................................................................................. 4 Karst Features ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Ecological Significance .............................................................................................................................. 5 Plant Communities ................................................................................................................................... -
Plant Community Responses to the Removal of Lonicera Maackii from an Urban Woodland Park
University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Plant community responses to the removal of Lonicera maackii from an urban woodland park. Elihu H. Levine University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Forest Biology Commons Recommended Citation Levine, Elihu H., "Plant community responses to the removal of Lonicera maackii from an urban woodland park." (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2613. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2613 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PLANT COMMUNITY RESPONSES TO THE REMOVAL OF LONICERA MAACKII FROM AN URBAN WOODLAND PARK By Elihu H. Levine B. A., Earlham College, 2005 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biology Department of Biology University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2016 PLANT COMMUNITY RESPONSES TO THE REMOVAL OF LONICERA MAACKII FROM AN URBAN WOODLAND PARK By Elihu H. Levine B.A., Earlham College, 2005 A Thesis Approved on November 16, 2016 By the following Thesis Committee: __________________________ Dr. Margaret Carreiro, Director __________________________ Dr. -
Harbinger Volume 34, No. 1, Spring 2017
SPRING 2017 Vol. 34, No. 1 “…dedicated to the study, appreciation, and conservation of the native flora and natural communities of Illinois.” New England aster, Aster novae-angliae, spontaneous color form, one of many in old-fields. Photo by Henry Eilers. Editorial This issue announces the long-awaited fifth edition of Plants of the Chicago Region, now renamed Flora of the Chicago Region. In a press release, the co-authors (Gerould Wilhelm and Laura Rericha) state that 100,000 hours of work went into the new volume, but it does not seem possible that the co-authors each put 50,000 hours into the project. What they apparently include in this total is all the time that numerous naturalists across the Chicago region contributed by looking for plants, recording what they saw, and sending data to the authors. There’s a huge Acknowledgments page in Plants of the Chicago Region and we expect an even larger one in the new edition. This is typical of the way that our world works. Everyone cooperates to advance the cause — and all keep open minds because they want to learn. Naturalists have much to teach — and it isn’t just about the environment. In This Issue Henry Eilers at Shoal Creek President’s Message Illinois Botanists Big Year 2016 INPS Chapter News Stateless Refugee: American Burnet Welcome New Members News & Events Governing Board Message from the President President It is late January as I write this, my first President’s Paul Marcum message to the Illinois Native Plant Society (INPS) Past President membership. -
Supplementary Information
Appendix: A Floristic Inventory of Six Tracts of the Ozark Plateau National Wildlife Refuge, Adair County, Oklahoma. Acanthaceae Dicliptera brachiata (Pursh) Spreng. occasional Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis Nutt. occasional Acanthaceae Ruellia pedunculata Torr. ex A. Gray occasional Adoxaceae Sambucus nigra L. infrequent Adoxaceae Viburnum prunifolium L. frequent Adoxaceae Viburnum rufidulum Raf. frequent Altingiaceae Liquidambar styraciflua L. occasional Amaranthaceae *Amaranthus hybridus L. infrequent Amaranthaceae *Chenopodium album L. occasional Amaranthaceae Chenopodium ambrosioides L. infrequent Amaryllidaceae Allium canadense L. infrequent Amaryllidaceae *Narcissus tazetta L. infrequent Amaryllidaceae Nothoscordum bivalve (L.) Britton occasional Anacardiaceae Rhus aromatica Aiton frequent Anacardiaceae Rhus copallinum L. frequent Anacardiaceae Rhus glabra L. frequent Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron radicans (L.) Kuntze frequent Annonaceae Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal occasional Apiaceae *Anthriscus caucalis M. Bieb. occasional Apiaceae Chaerophyllum tainturieri Hook. occasional Apiaceae Daucus carota L. occasional Apiaceae Eryngium yuccifolium Michx. infrequent Apiaceae Osmorhiza longistylis (Torr.) DC. occasional Apiaceae Polytaenia nuttallii DC. frequent Apiaceae *Sanicula canadensis L. occasional Apiaceae Sanicula odorata (Raf.) K.M. Pryer & L.R. Phillippe occasional Apiaceae Spermolepis inermis (Nutt. ex DC.) Mathias & Constance occasional Apiaceae *Taenidia integerrima (L.) Drude frequent Apiaceae Torilis arvensis (Huds.) Link occasional -
2020 Plant List Index: Trees & Shrubs Pg
2020 Plant List Index: Trees & Shrubs pg. 2-7 Perennials pg. 7-13 Grasses pg. 14 Ferns pg. 14-15 Vines pg. 15 Hours: May 1 – June 30: Tues.- Sat. 10 am - 6 pm Sun.11 am - 5 pm 3351 State Route 37 West www.sciotogardens.com On Mondays by appointment Delaware, OH 43015 Phone/fax: 740-363-8264 Email: [email protected] Sustainable, earth-friendly growth and maintenance practices: Real Soil = Real Difference. All plants are container-grown in a blend of local soil and compost. Plants are grown outside year-round. They are always in step with the seasons. Minimal pruning ensures a well-rooted, healthy plant. Use degradableRoot Pouch andcontainers. recycled containers to reduce waste. Use of controlled-release fertilizers minimizes leaching into the environment. Our primary focus is on native plants. However, non-invasive exotics are an equally important part of the choices we offer you. There is great creative opportunity using natives in combination with exotics. Adding more native plants into our landscapes provides food and habitat for wildlife and connections to larger natural areas. AdditionalAdditional species species may may be be available. available. Email Email oror call for currentcurrent availability, availability, sizes, sizes, and and prices. prices. «BOT_NAME» «BOT_NAME»Wetland Indicator Status—This is listed in parentheses after the common name when a status is known. All species «COM_NAM» «COM_NAM» «DESCRIP»have not been evaluated. The indicator code is helpful in evaluating«DESCRIP» the appropriate habitat for a