DOCSLIB.ORG

Oregon Railroads in the 1870S and 1880S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oregon Railroads in the 1870S and 1880S NFS Form 10-900 (Oct. 1990) Oregon WordPerfect 6.0 Format (Revised July 1998) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. historic name OREGON PACIFIC RAILROAD LINEAR HISTORIC DISTRICT other names/site number street & number Roughly a 20 mi section of the Old Railroad Grade between Idanha & the Cascade Range summit n/a not for publication Williamerrp, National Forest. Desr.rnites National Forest state Oregon code OR county Marion, Linn, Jefferson code -Q41JM1JHL zip code As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this i^nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property tXtheets _does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally {^statewide _locally. (g_ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title ' Date Wt/. e? State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property _x_meets _does not meet the National Register criteria. (_ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) \^ /Deputy SHPO December 22. 1998 Signature of certifying official/Title Date Oregon State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency and bureau feftifioliai wtSM®8BtWB& uertmc I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register. _ See continuation sheet. _ determined eligible for the National Register. _ See continuation sheet. _ determined not eligible for the National Register. _ removed from the National Register. _ other, (explain:)__________ Oregon Par ifjr RR nar ion, Li-gn. jerrer^uii -ui\ Name orProperty County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) D private D building(s) Contributing Noncontributing D public-local 0 district buildings D public-State D site 0 public-Federal D structure sites D object -20- structures objects 22 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) in the National Register ___N/A N/A________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Transportation, rail -related grade acant, use 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) N/A.rood s-?^? foundation _ walls___ roof other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) see continuation sheets Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing.) Fngineering, Transportation- related Q A Property is associated with events that have made Ethnic Herdrt-affe. European_______ a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. [3 B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. D C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. 1887-1880 1x1 D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) ——1887 - coEimencement of conotruction Property is: 1889 - construction vrork halted D A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person D B removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) Thomas Egenton Hogg D C a birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation D D a cemetery. D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. D F a commemorative property. D G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Architect/Builder within the past 50 years. F.f>rp1 son Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: Q preliminary determination of individual listing (36 D State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested D Other State agency D previously listed in the National Register D Federal agency D previously determined eligible by the National D Local government Register D University D designated a National Historic Landmark D Other D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Name of repository: #_____________ D recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # ____________________ Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 172.26 UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) 1 I I I I 3___ 1___L I I Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing z\__I I I . I I 1,1, I I 4 ___ I I . See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title Ward Tonsfeldt, Tim Rnypr organization Ward Tnnsfpldt. Consulting date Foh 1? 1QQft street & number 463 NW Congress __ telephone (541) 389-7965 city or town Bend, OR Q77m state _______ zip code ___ Additional Documentation Submit the following Kerns with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional Items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner (Comptete^is Hem at the request of SHPO or FPO.) Barrel Kenops, Supervisor Sally Collins, Supervisor name Willamette National Forest and Desr.hutes National Fnrpst _____________ PO Box 10607 1645 Highway 20 street & number city or town Bend state _QEL zip code 97440, 97701 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing Rstings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 ef sea;.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing Instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number —Z— Page —1—— SECTION 7 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION Scope of the Resource In August of 1995, the Willamette National Forest initiated a study of the Oregon Pacific (or Hogg) railroad to determine whether the uncompleted portions of the railroad might be eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places.1 The Oregon Pacific was built during the 1880s from Yaquina Bay, on the Oregon Coast, across the Coast Range and through the Willamette Valley in a generally west-east course. The railroad was completed as far east as Idanha, Oregon, in the foothills of the Cascade Mountains (see figs. 1,2, and 3). Although the railroad was shortened during the 1950s, it continues to operate as a branch line of the Southern Pacific system, largely employed in transporting lumber and other forest products. While the completed portion of the Oregon Pacific has been a successful if rather mundane branch line, the uncompleted portion has loomed large in Oregon folklore
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4-3. Oregon Climate Lab Exercise
    7.1 FYS207 WOU Earth Corps OREGON CLIMATE LAB Introduction Climate is the measure and description of average weather conditions for a place on Earth’s surface over time. Earth’s climate system is very complex. The atmosphere, hydrosphere (mostly oceans), lithosphere, cryosphere (ice), and biosphere all contribute to Earth’s climate. Understanding how all of these subsystems work is what helps scientists determine how subsystems respond to change. Oregon is a diverse place with regards to climate. The purpose of this lab is study the climate of Oregon and to focus on the major influences on Oregon’s varied climate. Goals and Objectives • Interpret climatic data from maps, tables, and graphs • Describe Oregon’s climate based on climatic data • Develop an understanding of the major factors influencing Oregon’s climate Useful Websites • http://weather.noaa.gov/weather/OR_cc_us.html • http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/CLIMATEDATA.html • http://www.oregonphotos.com/pagetwentyone-Q.html • http://www.worldbook.com/wb/Students?content_spotlight/ climates/north_american_climate_oregon • http://www.musc.edu/cando/geocam/atacama/atacama.html • http://www.esa.int/esaEO/SEM3PIWJD1E_index_0.html • http://www.wou.edu/las/physci/taylor/gs106/OregonRoadTrip.htm 7.2 Name________________________ Lab Day/Time_________________ Pre-lab Questions – Complete these questions working on lab. 1. Using internet search tools, define the following terms and answer the questions below: A. Orographic lifting (draw a sketch and describe) B. Rain shadow (draw a sketch and describe) C. Jet Stream (draw a sketch and describe) 2. What is the effect of proximity to a major body of water (like the Pacific Ocean) on climate? How does this relate to the amount of heat that water must absorb to change its temperature? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Santiam Wagon Road Is a Valued Treasure Listed on the National Register of Historic Places
    The Santiam Wagon Road is a valued treasure listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Along the route you can explore what early travelers Linking Landscapes and Livelihoods experienced on their journey through the central United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Cascades. Many access points can be found along Pacific Northwest Region The Santiam Wagon Road The surveyors reasoned the Indian trails would lead Highways 20 and 126, which follow the original Deschutes and Willamette National Forests holds an interesting and them east. When the party returned and proclaimed route of the wagon road through the Willamette unique place in Oregon's success, they joined with local ranchers to form the and Deschutes National Forests. Today you can Willamette Valley and Cascade Mountain Wagon hike or ride along the route; allowable modes of Your Guide to Exploring history. Unlike other wagon travel are identified on the map. Visitors should be roads that were built to Road Company. The new wagon road served as a aware that conditions and access on the wagon bring settlers to the dominant route across the Cascades from 1865 to Willamette Valley, this road 1939. Use of the wagon road declined with the road vary throughout the year. For more WAGO information contact one of the Forest Service N was designed to lead completion of US Highway 20 in 1939. offices listed below. Enjoy your visit! M settlers and their livestock Henry Wolthuis Dr. Photo credit: IA R eastward to the rich O pasture lands of Central T Oregon and to markets Albany Andrew Wiley A Lebanon N throughout eastern Oregon Sisters Ontario D and Idaho.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson County
    Jefferson County Prepared for: Culver, Madras, and Metolius Photos: Gary Halvorson, Oregon State Archives Jefferson County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Report for: Jefferson County, Oregon And the Cities of Culver, Madras, and Metolius Prepared by: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403 September, 2008 Special Thanks & Acknowledgements This Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan was developed through a regional partnership funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Pre- Disaster Mitigation Competitive Grant Program. The Southeast Oregon Region grant was awarded to support the development of natural hazard mitigation plans for the region. The region’s planning process utilized a four-phased planning process, plan templates and plan development support provided by the Partnership for Disaster Resilience at the University of Oregon. Regional partners include: • Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience at the University of Oregon’s Community Service Center • Oregon Emergency Management • Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region X • Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Project Steering Committee: • Jefferson County Community Development Department • Jefferson County Public Works Department • Crooked River Ranch Homeowners Association • Central Electric Cooperative • Warm Springs Tribe • Federal Grasslands • 509J School District • US Forest Service • Fire Department Agencies from Crooked River Ranch, Three Rivers, and the County • City of Culver • City of Metolius
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    Deschutes County Transportation System Plan 2010 - 2030 Adopted by Ordinance 2012-005 August 6, 2012 By The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners EXHIBIT C ORDINANCE 2012-005 Page 1 of 268 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 10 Chapter One Introduction ...................................................................................................................................30 1.1 Geographic Setting .......................................................................................................30 1.2 Transportation Planning ..............................................................................................31 Goal 12 .....................................................................................................................31 Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) ..................................................................31 TPR Requirements for Deschutes County ......................................................33 1.3 Major Changes Since the Adoption of the 1998 Plan ...........................................35 Regional Growth and Destination Resorts ......................................................35 Urban Growth and County Coordination .......................................................36 Public Transportation ...........................................................................................36 Financial Impacts ....................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • Preface to Chapters And
    Page PREFACE TO CHAPTERS AND Chapter provides an overview of resources found within the Upper McKenzie Watershed Chapter provides additional more detailed analysis on some of the resources and the information is presented by Landform Block The Landform Blocks were created to aid in presenting and integrating data within specific areas Stratification considered geological processes as well as vegetation patterns fire behavior valley segment types and fish and wildlife habitat Chapter uses the Landform Blocks as basis for comparison of resources within the watershed Chapter Page CHAPTER PAST CURRENT CONDITIONS AND RANGE OF HISTORIC VARIABILITY OVERVIEW OF GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Introduction The Cascade Range is north-south trending line of volcanoes associated with the Cascadia subduction zone off the Oregon coast As the Padfic plate is pushed under the North American plate in this zone melting of the rock occurs with mcreased depth The molten rock is then forced to the surface as volcamc eruptions which is the mountain-building process of the Cascades The Upper McKenzie Watershed is located in the Cascades where two physiographic provinces meet older Western Cascades 9-40 million years old and younger High Cascades million years old to the present The stratigraphic and time sequence proposed by Priest Woller and Black Priest and Vogt 1983 is used in this analysis except that the early High Cascade ridge- capping basalts 9-4 million years B.P including Avarmenks 1981 Browder Bunchgrass and Iron Mountain units and Flahertys 1981 Frissel-Ollallie
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Snowdepth Comparison Along the Cascade Range This Compilation Is ©2002-2005 Amar Andalkar
    Page 1 of 5 Historical Snowdepth Comparison along the Cascade Range This compilation is ©2002-2005 Amar Andalkar www.skimountaineer.com Snowdepths in inches for the listed period of record, measured at snow courses, snow stakes, and automated gauges Data provided by: throughout the length of the Cascade Range. Note that snowfall data is available for only a few of these sites. BCRFC British Columbia River Forecast Centre NWAC Northwest Weather & Avalanche Center NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service WRCC Western Regional Climate Center Updated through the 2003-2004 season. Italicized numbers are estimated based on limited available data. CCSS California Cooperative Snow Surveys NPS National Park Service See the end of the chart for an explanation of the Depth and Variability classification codes. WBSR Whistler Blackcomb Ski Resort ECNCA Environment Canada National Climate Archive BRITISH COLUMBIA Jan 1 Feb 1 Mar 1 Apr 1 May 1 Depth Variab 350 Bridge Glacier, N of Mt Meager (4600 ft) 350 Tenquille Lake, E of Mt Meager (5500 ft) Bridge Glacier (Lower) Average 47 61 65 69 61 Avg Snowfall — L LV 300 300 4600 ft (15 miles north of Mt Meager) Minimum 32 48 40 47 43 Max Snowfall — 250 250 BCRFC, monthly, 1995–present Maximum 63 88 117 108 87 Max Depth 117 (1999) 200 200 This fairly new measurement site is located at the eastern end of the Lillooet Icefield, in the next drainage north of the Mount Meager 171 150 150 Volcanic Complex. Snowdepths are relatively low but quite consistent due to its northerly location and icefield margin microclimate.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guides
    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on August 1, 2011 Field Guides Fire and water: Volcanology, geomorphology, and hydrogeology of the Cascade Range, central Oregon Katharine V. Cashman, Natalia I. Deligne, Marshall W. Gannett, Gordon E. Grant and Anne Jefferson Field Guides 2009;15;539-582 doi: 10.1130/2009.fld015(26) Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Field Guides Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes © 2009 Geological Society of America Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on August 1, 2011 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 15 2009 Fire and water: Volcanology, geomorphology, and hydrogeology of the Cascade Range, central Oregon Katharine V.
    [Show full text]
  • An Abstract of the Thesis Of
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Shyam Das-Toke for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on April 29, 2019 Title: Creating a Predictive Model of Cinder Cone Ages in Central Oregon Abstract approved: ___________________________________________________ Adam J.R. Kent Cinder cones are useful geomorphic features for geological analysis because they generally have known initial states and follow a similar pattern of degradation as they are exposed to erosive processes. Characterizing large cinder cone fields in terms of age and composition requires significant resources, so this study aims to understand the parameters that influence cinder cone evolution in order to create a predictive age model of cones in Central Oregon. We utilize newly available high- resolution topography and new estimates of cinder cone age to evaluate a quantitative model of cone ages. The field site allows assessment of the effects of cone composition and precipitation in governing the morphology of Central Oregon cinder cones through time. We anticipate that these results will allow estimation of the age of individual cones which have not yet been dated directly. Statistical analyses show that younger cones have both significantly steeper slopes and more defined cone craters than older ones. Results also show that increased local precipitation does not appear to significantly influence cone morphology. However, composition as determined by silica content does influence initial morphology, as weight percentages vary by 15% and lead to differences of 8° in cone slope. After cone formation though, erosive processes such as mass wasting are more influential in influencing cones than chemical content. The statistical model of cone age that we create can be used to estimate cinder cone ages throughout the Central Oregon region and can be used in time-volume studies of monogenetic volcanism.
    [Show full text]
  • NEPA--Environmental Assessment
    United States Department of Environmental Agriculture Forest Assessment Service December 2007 Santiam Pass Summer Motorized Recreation Project Non-Significant Forest Plan Amendment #49 McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Linn County, Oregon Legal Location: T.13S, R.7E, T.13S, R.7 1/2E, T.14S, R.7 1/2E, and T.14S, R.7 1/2E; W.M. For Information Contact: Mary Allison, District Ranger McKenzie River Ranger District 57600 McKenzie Highway McKenzie Bridge, Oregon 97413 541-822-3381 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Figure 1 Willamette National Forest McKenzie River District Santiam Pass Summer Motorized Recreation Project To Salem N N N NN N N N N N N N NN NN N N N N N N NN N N N NN N N N To Bend N Vicinity Map Project N N N N N N N N Area NN N N N N N N N N N N Clear N N N N N N Lake N N N N N N N N H N Big w Lake y 1 2 6 Smith Res Trail Bridge Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Trail Guide
    SISTERS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SISTERS WINTERAREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TRAIL GUIDE Sisters Area Chamber of Commerce www.thesisterscountry.com Special thanks to EST SERVI FOR CE D E E P U S R A U R TMENT OF AGRICU L T DAY USE OF USFS TRAILS Always use good judgement when using or traveling over trails and roads. Some are not maintained and may be hazardous. Weather and other conditions can change without notice, so carry clothing for rain and cold temperatures. Always carry adequate water for all hikes and never drink trailside water from lakes and streams unless marked “potable” by the Forest Service. Food, matches, first-aid kit, flashlight, compass and maps are also essential. Deschutes and Willamette National Forest Maps, the McKenzie River National Recreation Trail Map , and the Three Sisters, Mt. Washington, and Mt. Jefferson Wilderness maps are available at Forest Service Stations. Mosquito repellent should also be carried along in late spring and summer months. As a safety precaution, always let someone know where you are going and when you expect to return. Dogs should be on a leash or controlled by voice command. Be sure to have appropriate parking and trail permits for specific destinations. The Sisters Area Chamber of Commerce and its members are not responsible for losses or injuries incurred when utilizing this information. Wilderness Areas and US Forest Service Land Uses Wilderness Areas have a delicate state of natural balance. Careless acts by people can upset this balance, resulting in destruction of the wilderness environment. The following practices will help preserve the wilderness for everyone’s enjoyment.
    [Show full text]
  • Andesite Conference Guidebook
    ANDESITE CONFERENCE GUIDEBOOK I NTERNATI 0 NAL UPPER MANTLE PROJECT Sci enti fi c Report 16-S Published by: State of Oregon, Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, as Bulletin 62 International UPPER MANTLE COMMITTEE Prof. V. V. BELOUSSOV, Chairman (Moscow) Dr. Luis R. A. CAPURRO (Buenos Aires) Prof. A. E. RINGWOOD (Canberra) Dr. J. M. HARRISON (Ottawa) Prof. S. K. RUNCORN (Newcastle-upon-Tyne) Prot. Leon KNOPOFF, Secretary-General (Los Angeles) Dr. Klyoo \,VADATI (Tokyo) ANDESITE CONFERENCE July 1 to 6, 1968 Eugene and Bend, Oregon U. S. A. Sponsored by: University of Oregon Center for Volcanology A. R. McBirney, Director International Upper Mantle Committee Prof. Hisashi Kuno, Chairman Working Group on Petrology and Volcanism State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries H. M. Dole, State Geologist Financial assistance for the Andesite Conference was provided by the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics and by the International Union of Geological Sciences. The Upper Mantle Project is an international program of research on the solid earth sponsored by the International Counci I of Scientific Unions; the program is coordinated by the International Upper Mantle Committee, an IUGG committee set up jointly by the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics and the International Union of Geological Sciences, with rules providing for the active participation of all interested ICSU Unions and Committees. Cover Picture: Andesite Thin Section Cover design is a microdrawing of the hypersthene-augite andesite at the highest peak of Mount jefferson. The rock is typical of the andesites of the Oregon Cascades in both its petrographic features and chemical composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan
    JEFFERSON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Adopted December 27, 2006 By Ordinance O-01-07 and O-03-07 Effective January 1, 2007 Amended March 28, 2007 by O-49-07 Amended June 6, 2007 by O-82-07 Amended December 5, 2007 by 0-200-07 Amended September 24, 2008 by 0-161-08 Amended November 12, 2008 by 0-180-08 Amended October 28, 2009 by O-129-09 Amended January 27, 2010 by O-010-10 Amended April 14, 2010 by O-039-10 Amended May 22, 2013 by O-060-13 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mike Ahern Wayne Fording John Hatfield PLANNING COMMISSION Dick Dodson, Chair Paulette Nordin, Vice-Chair Evan Thomas Roy Hyder Bob Powers COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Phil Stenbeck, CFM, Planning Director Tanya Cloutier, Senior Planning Technician TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE Part 1 Background 1 Part 2 Goals and Policies 7 Goal 1 Citizen Involvement 8 Goal 2 Land Use Planning 10 Goal 3 Agricultural Lands 12 Goal 4 Forest Lands 16 Goal 5 Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 19 Riparian Corridors, Water Areas and Fish Habitat 20 Wetlands 23 Wildlife Habitat 24 Bird Nesting Sites 27 Federal Wild and Scenic Rivers 29 State Scenic Waterways 30 Groundwater Resources 31 Approved Recreation Trails 32 Natural Areas 33 Wilderness Areas 34 Mineral and Aggregate Resources 34 Energy Sources 37 Cultural Areas 38 Historic Resources 39 Open Space 41 Scenic Views and Sites 42 Goal 6 Air, Water and Land Resources Quality 43 Goal 7 Areas Subject to Natural Hazards 45 Goal 8 Recreational Needs 48 Goal 9 Economic Development 56 Goal 10 Housing 60 Goal 11 Public Facilities
    [Show full text]