DOCSLIB.ORG

The Systems Influence on the Development of the Group Theatre

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Systems Influence on the Development of the Group Theatre Voces Novae Volume 6 Article 7 2018 “We Need New Forms”: The ysS tems Influence on the Development of the Group Theatre Colby Sostarich Chapman University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae Recommended Citation Sostarich, Colby (2018) "“We Need New Forms”: The ysS tems Influence on the Development of the Group Theatre," Voces Novae: Vol. 6 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae/vol6/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Voces Novae by an authorized editor of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sostarich: “We Need New Forms”: The Systems Influence on the Development of "We Need New Forms" Voces Novae: Chapman University Historical Review, Vol 6, No 1 (2014) HOME ABOUT USER HOME SEARCH CURRENT ARCHIVES PHI ALPHA THETA Home > Vol 6, No 1 (2014) "We Need New Forms": The Systems Influence on the Development of the Group Theatre Colby Sostarich Prologue On a cold and snowy day in 1924 a troupe of Russian actors, led by Constantin Stanislavsky, was making their way through Washington D.C. to visit the White House. The Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover, invited the artists to an audience with the president. Once at the White House, a few cultural differences between the Americans and the Russians became apparent. The Russian habit of removing and checking winter clothes once inside a building was not observed, forcing the actors to awkwardly carry their coats. To make matters worse, the demands of the president's office kept them waiting, though the appointment had a set time. Due to the awkward situation, Stanislavsky began performing to lighten the mood. He demonstrated the elaborate way that men and women used to bow during the eighteenth-century. This frivolity was suddenly cut short as the troupe was herded into the company of President Calvin Coolidge.[1] Though Stanislavsky was an informal cultural ambassador between the two countries, Coolidge seemed to be rather ambivalent to the meeting. Elizabeth Reynolds-Hapgood, an American accompanying the crew, noted the president's cool reaction. To Hapgood it was "impossible to guess whether he had any idea that standing there before him were the actors of the world famous Moscow Art Theatre--who, incidentally, were the first persons with Soviet Passports to be received at the Whitehouse."[2] Stanislavsky and his troupe were greeted kindly by the president, but were not allowed to speak because a foreign citizen could only talk with the president through an ambassador. There was no ambassador for the Soviet Union yet, so they were forced to sit through the meeting in silence. Though the gathering was less than glamorous, the actors were not bothered. They left the president to go practice for their next play where they would be pretending to be Tsars.[3] The conference between Stanislavsky and Coolidge is not remembered as some great meeting of the minds. This meeting was not a large political or artistic triumph, but it represents an important step in the evolution of the relationship between the Russian art community and America. While the event could be representative of the political environment in the 1920's, the sheer fact the meeting even took place added to the mythos of Stanislavsky.[4] He was an artist so great that even during the first American tour, he and the Moscow Art Theatre (MXT) were recognized for their artistic contributions. Though he was not able to ease the political tension between the two countries, his presence in America started a process of cultural exchange. This meeting would be the first of many points of contact between the Russian figure and American culture, thus marking the beginning of the Stanislavsky tradition in the United States. Constantin Stanislavsky brought a revolutionary theory to America. His ideas, known collectively as the System, were a combination of exercises, techniques, and concepts that changed the interoperation of characters, emotional states, and textual analysis. The all-encompassing training regime, developed in the early part of the 20th century, responded to the natural and realistic artistic and theatrical movements popular during the period. By employing the System, actors could accurately portray the lives and emotions of characters developed by the great Copyright © 2014 Colby Sostarich Voces Novae, Vol 6, No 1 (2014) 105 Published by Chapman University Digital Commons, 2018 1 Voces Novae, Vol. 6 [2018], Art. 7 Colby Sostarich playwrights of the time. The theory, introduced to America by the 1923-24 tour of the Moscow Art Theatre and subsequently by Russian émigré teachers, had already undergone radical changes. By the time of its introduction in the United States, it was not the same series of techniques and exercises developed by Stanislavsky in Russia. Though they bear striking similarities, the key differences altered the application and realization of the System. Stanislavsky might be a theatrical hero, but his pure thoughts on the process of acting were not introduced by the American Tour, the Group Theatre, or even through his own writing. Instead, a series of mimics were used as the foundation of the System in America, and the final creation developed a new breed of distinctly American techniques that changed the course of theatrical development in the United States. The origins of the System and its creator have become theatrical legend. Practitioners hailed Stanislavsky and his creation as a brilliant contribution to the study of acting. Stanislavsky became synonymous with certain ideas that allowed theatre to evolve into its present form. His techniques provide a framework to create realistic characters and emotions on stage in the actor's pursuit for artistic truth. By utilizing texts developed during specific artistic movements, realism and modernism, Stanislavsky introduced a style of acting that depended upon the actors living the part and not simply acting it out. Originally, the System was a loosely defined set of rules that allowed access to the inner technique "that is necessary for promoting a proper creative mood[that] is based in the main on will."[5] It accessed a form of acting that tapped into the realistic and naturalistic artistic movements of the day by basing the training and rehearsal process on a strong foundation of style, concentration, and given circumstances. Shortly after its introduction in America, theatre practitioners in New York adopted the System. Through experiences with Russian émigré teachers like Richard Boleslavsky, new versions of the theory, such as Lee Strasberg's Method, were created. These new forms of the System became the foundation for a burgeoning company, the Group Theatre. The young artists who would make up the Group Theatre were highly influenced by the foundation Stanislavsky provided. Responsible for popularizing the use of the System, the Group Theatre's experiments created even more theories associated with Stanislavsky's original ideas. By 1934, the differing opinions of how the System should be applied created a wide schism between American actors. Members of the Group Theatre, including Lee Strasberg and Stella Adler, visited Moscow in order to learn about the System developed by Stanislavsky and his colleagues. Upon returning to America, Strasberg acknowledged the System provided a good foundation, but felt that his own work improved upon the foundation provided by the Russians. The evolution was a result of his method being an American interpretation and not simply a copy of Stanislavsky.[6] Stella Adler, an actress in the Group Theatre, also sought out Stanislavsky, desiring lessons in the System. Adler gained a better understanding of the faults manifesting in the American System and decided to return to the source. In a polarizing event that divided the group of thespians, Adler returned to America urging a more stringent application of Stanislavsky's core ideas. The Group split into two camps, those that followed Adler, and those that followed Strasberg. One member compared this ideological schism to that of the Republicans and Democrats.[7] All of the multiple schools of thought that exist count Stanislavsky as their founding father and work to uphold the ideals of the System he created. It is through Adler, Strasberg, and their colleague's work that the true transformation of the Stanislavsky System occurred, and simultaneously entered America as the de facto foundation for any aspiring actor. The aim of this paper is to explore the interpretation of the System and the influences that radically changed its practical application by the Group Theatre through the examination of the published material of the individuals involved. In order to adapt the artistic style for an American audience, artists needed to introduce a hybridized version of the technique that pulled elements from both dominant cultures. These concepts, communicated through émigré teachers, specifically Richard Boleslavsky, and his writings provide the point of contact between the Russian practitioner and the new, distinctly American form of theatre that was built upon Stanislavsky's foundation. 106 Voces Novae, Vol 6, No 1 (2014) https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae/vol6/iss1/7 2 Sostarich: “We Need New Forms”: The Systems Influence on the Development of "We Need New Forms" A majority of the current research on Stanislavsky attempts to either break or uphold the image created around his work. The split focus of the research indicates that though some historians, such as Sharon Marie Carnicke, feel the myth needs to be rewritten. Carnicke, one of the leading scholars on Stanislavsky, centered her work on the mistranslation of the Russian Master's work specifically by American Artists. Her work Stanislavsky in Focus: An Acting Master for the Twenty-First Century broke down the evolution of the System into three parts: transmission, translation, and transformation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paul Green Foundation
    Paul Green Foundation NEWS – January 2014 Final Week for THE In his 1931 New York Times HOUSE OF CONNELLY review, Brooks Atkinson wrote that Mr. Green “…has such abundant understanding, such integrity The New York City hit of character – a magnetism of passion that you are The House of Connelly by Paul Green enters its likely to remember the pure truth of his prose poem final week with performances on: Thurs Feb 6- Sat long after you have forgotten a thousand craftsmen- Feb 8th at 8 PM and Sunday Feb 9th at 3 p.m. The like plays about love, family and possessions.” Group Theatre's first play in 1931 receives a top- notch 2014 ReGroup production that is receiving In 1934, the play was turned into the film Carolina raves from audiences and critics alike! starring Lionel Barrymore, Robert Young, Janet For tickets: www.regrouptheatre.org/ Gaynor and 6-year-old Shirley Temple. http://thehouseofconnelly.com/About.html ReGroup’s The House of Connelly features a 16 Critics say: person cast and was staged by Allie Mulholland who writes this about the production: "ReGroup is one of the most important companies in the city. Allie Mulholland unearths long-neglected treasures “We have Broadway actors and many wonderful and directs them with loving care. Don't miss even one of his productions." actors in the show, ranging from 20 to late 60s. At most, they're getting paid $99 for 2 months of work – – Peter Filichia, Theatre World Awards, Jan 2014 14 shows. I've asked them WHY ‐ why would you do this for free, and even ask to do extra rehearsals, and "THE HOUSE OF CONNELLY is a fascinating and complicated slice of Americana.
    [Show full text]
  • California State University, Northridge The
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE THE PREPARATION OF THE ROLE OF TOM MOODY IN CLIFFORD ODETS' GOLDEN BOY An essay submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Theatre by Robert T. Hollander June, 1981 The Essay of Robert T. Hollander is approved: Prof. c(§!g Nieuwenhuysel Dr. Georg~ Gunkle, Committee Chairman California State University, Northridge ii ABSTRACT THE PREPARATION OF THE ROLE OF TOM MOODY IN CLIFFORD ODETS' GOLDEN BOY by Robert T. Hollander Master of Arts in Theatre Golden Boy was first produced by the Group Theatre in New York in 1937. Directed by Harold Clurman, this 1937 production included in its cast names that were to become notable in the American theatre: Luther Adler, Frances Farmer, Lee J. Cobb, Jules (John) Garfield, Morris Carnovsky, Elia Kazan, Howard Da Silva and Karl Malden. Golden Boy quickly became the most successful production 1 in Group Theatre history and was followed in 1939 by the movie of the same name, starring William Holden and Barbara Stanwyck. Since then, there have been countless revivals, including a musical adaptation in 1964 which starred Sammy Davis Jr. Golden Boy certainly merits consideration as one of the classics of modern American drama. 1Harold Clurman, The Fervent Years: The Story of the Group Theatre and the Thirties. (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. A Harvest Book, 1975), p. 211. 1 2 The decision to prepare the character of Torn Moody as a thesis project under the direction of Dr. George Gunkle was made during the spring semester of 1980 at which time I was performing a major role in The Knight of the Burning Pestle, a seventeenth century farce written by Beaumont and Fletcher.
    [Show full text]
  • BACKSTORY: the CREDITS an Actor
    BACKSTORY Your behind-the-scenes look at TimeLine productions YESTERDAY’S STORIES. TODAY’S TOPICS. From Artistic Director PJ Powers a message Dear Friends, that their “Person of the — can influence history is made With his blend of social classic for the ages. You just Year” was You. Me. Us. The through activism, be On behalf of TimeLine’s not only in commentary and might be surprised that the average citizen. it personal, social or entire company, I am government emotional complexity, age in which it was written political. thrilled to welcome you to Admittedly, upon first buildings and Odets revolutionized the really is not our own! our 11th season! Each year hearing that, I thought There are many complex at corporate American theater during As we usher in a second we go through a series of it was a poor excuse for issues — not the least of board tables, but in the The Depression by putting decade of making history at discussions about the issues not choosing a person of which will be a Presidential homes and workplaces of the struggles and longings TimeLine, we’re delighted and types of stories we national prominence — a election — that will demand people like you and me. of everyday citizens on the to share another Odets stage. With Paradise Lost, want explore, and this year single someone who had great thoughtfulness in the We begin our season-long play with you. With much he gives voice to those our deliberations seemed made a sizeable imprint on coming year. Each of us will conversation by revisiting to discuss, I hope our little individuals and exposes a even more extensive and issues of global importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Awake and Sing! Study Guide/Lobby Packett Prepared by Sara Freeman, Dramaturg
    Awake and Sing! Study Guide/Lobby Packett Prepared by Sara Freeman, dramaturg Section I Clifford Odets: A Striving Life Clifford Odets was born in Philadelphia, on July 18, 1906, the son of a working-class Jewish family made good. Louis Odets, his father, had been a peddler, but also worked as a printer for a publishing company. In 1908, Louis Odets moved his family to New York City, where, after a brief return to Philadelphia, he prospered as a printer and ended up owning his own plant and an advertising agency, as well as serving as a Vice President of a boiler company. Odets grew up in the middle-class Bronx, not the Berger’s Bronx of tenements and squalor. Still Odets described himself as a “melancholy kid” who clashed often with his father. Odets quit high school after two years. When he was 17, Odets plunged into the theatre. He joined The Drawing Room Players and Harry Kemp’s Poets’ Theater. He wrote some radio plays, did summer stock, and hit the vaudeville circuit as “The Roving Reciter.” In 1929, he moved into the city because of a job understudying Spencer Tracy in Conflict on Broadway. A year later Odets joined the nascent Group Theatre, having met Harold Clurman and some of the other Group actors while playing bit parts at the Theatre Guild. The Group philosophy became the shaping force of Odets’ life as a writer. Clurman became his best friend and most perceptive critic. Odets wrote the first version of Awake and Sing!, then called I Got the Blues, in 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAINING the YOUNG ACTOR: a PHYSICAL APPROACH a Thesis
    TRAINING THE YOUNG ACTOR: A PHYSICAL APPROACH A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Anthony Lewis Johnson December, 2009 TRAINING THE YOUNG ACTOR: A PHYSICAL APPROACH Anthony Lewis Johnson Thesis Approved: Accepted: __________________________ __________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Mr. James Slowiak Dr. Dudley Turner __________________________ __________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. Durand Pope Dr. George R. Newkome __________________________ __________________________ School Director Date Mr. Neil Sapienza ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION TO TRAINING THE YOUNG ACTOR: A PHYSICAL APPROACH...............................................................................1 II. AMERICAN INTERPRETATIONS OF STANISLAVSKI’S EARLY WORK .......5 Lee Strasberg .............................................................................................7 Stella Adler..................................................................................................8 Robert Lewis...............................................................................................9 Sanford Meisner .......................................................................................10 Uta Hagen.................................................................................................11 III. STANISLAVSKI’S LATER WORK .................................................................13 Tension
    [Show full text]
  • CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS AMERICAN PLAYS by CLIFFORD ODETS and OTHER PLAYWRIGHTS DURING 1930S
    IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL) ISSN (P): 2347-4564; ISSN (E): 2321-8878 Vol. 6, Issue 4, Apr 2018, 51-56 © Impact Journals CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS AMERICAN PLAYS BY CLIFFORD ODETS AND OTHER PLAYWRIGHTS DURING 1930s G. Visalam Head, Department of English, Sri Muthukumaran Arts and Science College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Received: 31 Mar 2018 Accepted: 04 Apr 2018 Published: 07 Apr 2018 ABSTRACT American Plays had a tremendous response during 1930s and several genre of plays were staged at all corners of America and the Americans were fond of enacting and viewing the plays. The genre of plays will vary based on the American people mindset and the political situations. Several playwrights followed Hollywood techniques for writing their scripts. The role of playwright was found to be more vital than the role of an actor or the Director or the Production Company. The contribution of the playwrights during 1930s was considered to be a trend setting period in changing the roles of a writer from technician to becoming an artist. KEYWORDS : Playwright, Writer, Script, Actor, Play, Drama, Theatre INTRODUCTION During the 1930s, the playwrights followed Hollywood’s technique for paying writers for their scripts. Theatres such as Group Theatre and the Theatre Guild supported this idea to consider writers as autonomous artists whose function was very important than any other member of the company. The scripts were sold on the basis of their value, but they were written without the specific actor, particular director or any theatres in mind. Thus the Star System of Pre-World War came to an end, by giving importance to the playwright.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder-Suicide Ruled in Shooting a Homicide-Suicide Label Has Been Pinned on the Deaths Monday Morning of an Estranged St
    -* •* J 112th Year, No: 17 ST. JOHNS, MICHIGAN - THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 1967 2 SECTIONS - 32 PAGES 15 Cents Murder-suicide ruled in shooting A homicide-suicide label has been pinned on the deaths Monday morning of an estranged St. Johns couple whose divorce Victims had become, final less than an hour before the fatal shooting. The victims of the marital tragedy were: *Mrs Alice Shivley, 25, who was shot through the heart with a 45-caliber pistol bullet. •Russell L. Shivley, 32, who shot himself with the same gun minutes after shooting his wife. He died at Clinton Memorial Hospital about 1 1/2 hqurs after the shooting incident. The scene of the tragedy was Mrsy Shivley's home at 211 E. en name, Alice Hackett. Lincoln Street, at the corner Police reconstructed the of Oakland Street and across events this way. Lincoln from the Federal-Mo­ gul plant. It happened about AFTER LEAVING court in the 11:05 a.m. Monday. divorce hearing Monday morn­ ing, Mrs Shivley —now Alice POLICE OFFICER Lyle Hackett again—was driven home French said Mr Shivley appar­ by her mother, Mrs Ruth Pat­ ently shot himself just as he terson of 1013 1/2 S. Church (French) arrived at the home Street, Police said Mrs Shlv1 in answer to a call about a ley wanted to pick up some shooting phoned in fromtheFed- papers at her Lincoln Street eral-Mogul plant. He found Mr home. Shivley seriously wounded and She got out of the car and lying on the floor of a garage went in the front door* Mrs MRS ALICE SHIVLEY adjacent to -• the i house on the Patterson got out of-'the car east side.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Stanislavsky and the Moscow Art Theatre's 1923 And
    CULTURAL EXCHANGE: THE ROLE OF STANISLAVSKY AND THE MOSCOW ART THEATRE’S 1923 AND1924 AMERICAN TOURS Cassandra M. Brooks, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2014 APPROVED: Olga Velikanova, Major Professor Richard Golden, Committee Member Guy Chet, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Brooks, Cassandra M. Cultural Exchange: The Role of Stanislavsky and the Moscow Art Theatre’s 1923 and 1924 American Tours. Master of Arts (History), August 2014, 105 pp., bibliography, 43 titles. The following is a historical analysis on the Moscow Art Theatre’s (MAT) tours to the United States in 1923 and 1924, and the developments and changes that occurred in Russian and American theatre cultures as a result of those visits. Konstantin Stanislavsky, the MAT’s co-founder and director, developed the System as a new tool used to help train actors—it provided techniques employed to develop their craft and get into character. This would drastically change modern acting in Russia, the United States and throughout the world. The MAT’s first (January 2, 1923 – June 7, 1923) and second (November 23, 1923 – May 24, 1924) tours provided a vehicle for the transmission of the System. In addition, the tour itself impacted the culture of the countries involved. Thus far, the implications of the 1923 and 1924 tours have been ignored by the historians, and have mostly been briefly discussed by the theatre professionals. This thesis fills the gap in historical knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Chicago Repertory Group Collection of Scripts and Scrapbooks 1933-1947
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the Chicago Repertory Group Collection of Scripts and Scrapbooks 1933-1947 © 2006 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Descriptive Summary 3 Information on Use 3 Access 3 Citation 3 Historical Note 3 Scope Note 5 Related Resources 5 Subject Headings 5 INVENTORY 5 Series I: Sketches, Plays, Poems, Lyrics 6 Series II: Songs 10 Series III: Oversized songs, Musical Scores, and Misc. Items 12 Series IV: Oversized Scores and Lyrics; Songs and Musicals 15 Series V: Scrapbooks 16 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.CRG Title Chicago Repertory Group Collection of Scripts and Scrapbooks Date 1933-1947 Size 5.5 linear ft (10 boxes) Repository Special Collections Research Center University of Chicago Library 1100 East 57th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 U.S.A. Abstract The Chicago Repertory Group Collection, presented to the University Library in June, 1958, by Gertrude Gunter Soltker, an original member of the group, consists of typescripts, carbons, and mimeograph copies of 267 plays, songs, and sketches used by the group, as well as six scrapbooks containing newspaper clippings, programs, and publicity for the group. Information on Use Access The collection is open for use. Citation When quoting material from this collection, the preferred citation is: Chicago Repertory Group Collection of Scripts and Scrapbooks, [Box #, Folder #], Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library Historical Note The Chicago Repertory Group was founded in 1934 by six amateur actors with the aim of creating a social theater relevant to its time. The non-profit group sought to bring theater to people who could not afford the price of professional theater.
    [Show full text]
  • The Group Theatre: a Reflection of the Theatre in the Thirties
    Oberlin Digital Commons at Oberlin Honors Papers Student Work 1972 The Group Theatre: A Reflection of the Theatre in the Thirties Abby Eiferman Schor Oberlin College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/honors Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Repository Citation Schor, Abby Eiferman, "The Group Theatre: A Reflection of the Theatre in the Thirties" (1972). Honors Papers. 756. https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/honors/756 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Digital Commons at Oberlin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Oberlin. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GROUP THEATRE: A REFLECTION OF THE THEATRE IN THE THIRTIES Abby Ruth Eiferman April 29, 1972 S~ng us a song of social significance Or you can sing until you're blue Let meaning shine in every line Or we wonat love you. 1 This snatch of. lyrics, sung in the International Ladies Garment Workers. Union revue Pins and Needles of 1937 captures an<~ important aspect of the literary spirit of the 1930' s. This decade was marked by a tendency of artists towards political and social commitment, a time when the reconstruction of American .. socie~y,~nq. the menace of Fascism was a cause celebre to which artists 90u1.d rally. American artists had always been interested in chang!!lgsociety, or at least exposing the evils they perceived. "but the 1930' s saw a new kind of commitment and dedication.
    [Show full text]
  • John Garfield
    John Garfield: An Inventory of His Papers at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Garfield, John, 1913-1952 Title: John Garfield Papers Dates: 1932-2010, undated Extent: 4 document boxes, 2 oversize box (osb), 2 bound volumes (bv) (5.04 linear feet) Abstract: The John Garfield papers, 1932-2010, consist of production photographs and film stills, headshots, photographs, posters, sheet music, clippings, and press releases from his film and stage work; film contracts, articles, magazines, family photos, and correspondence donated by his daughter, Julie Garfield. Call Number: Film Collection No. FI-00074 Language: English Access: Open for research. Researchers must create an online Research Account and agree to the Materials Use Policy before using archival materials. Special Handling Special Handling Instructions: Most of the binders in this collection Instructions: have been left in an unaltered or minimally processed state to provide the reader with the look and feel of the original. When handling the binders with inserted materials, users are asked to be extremely careful in retaining the original order of the material . Most of the photographs and negatives in the collection have been sleeved, but patrons must use gloves when handling unsleeved photographic materials. Use Policies: Ransom Center collections may contain material with sensitive or confidential information that is protected under federal or state right to privacy laws and regulations. Researchers are advised that the disclosure of certain information pertaining to identifiable living individuals represented in the collections without the consent of those individuals may have legal ramifications (e.g., a cause of action under common law for invasion of privacy may arise if facts concerning an individual's private life are published that would be deemed highly offensive to a reasonable person) for which the Ransom Center and The University of Texas at Austin assume no responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanislavsky an Introduction – Jean Benedetti
    Jean Benedetti was born in 1930 and educated in England and France. He trained as an actor and teacher at the Rose Bruford College of Speech and Drama, returning in 1970 as Principal of the College until 1987. He is author of a number of semi-documentary television plays. His published translations include Brecht’s Edward II and A Respectable Wedding and Georges Michel’s A Sunday Walk. His first book was a biography of Gilles de Rais. In 1982 he published the first edition of Stanislavski: An Introduction, which has been reprinted many times. Stanisla- vski: A Biography was first published in 1988 and then revised and expanded. He subsequently published The Moscow Art Theatre Letters in 1991 and Dear Writer … Dear Actress, the love letters of Anton Chekhov and Olga Knipper, in 1997. Stanislavski and the Actor, an account of Stanislavski’s teaching in the last three years of his life, followed in 1998. From 1979 to 1987 he was chairman of the Theatre Education Committee of the International Theatre Insti- tute (UNESCO). He is currently Honorary Professor at both Rose Bruford College and Queen Margaret University College Edinburgh. Books by Stanislavski AN ACTOR PREPARES AN ACTOR’S HANDBOOK BUILDING A CHARACTER CREATING A ROLE MY LIFE IN ART STANISLAVSKI IN REHEARSAL STANISLAVSKI’S LEGACY STANISLAVSKI ON OPERA Books by Jean Benedetti STANISLAVSKI: HIS LIFE AND ART STANISLAVSKI & THE ACTOR THE MOSCOW ART THEATRE LETTERS DEAR WRITER, DEAR ACTRESS: THE LOVE LETTERS OF ANTON CHEKHOV AND OLGA KNIPPER Stanislavski An Introduction Jean Benedetti A Theatre Arts Book Routledge New York A Theatre Arts Book Published in the USA and Canada in 2004 by Routledge 29 West 35th Street New York, NY 10001 www.routledge-ny.com Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
    [Show full text]