Technical & Financial File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technical & Financial File TECHNICAL & FINANCIAL FILE SUSTAINABLE IMPROVEMENT OF THE BANANA CROPPING SYSTEM IN KAGERA REGION AND KIBONDO DISTRICT IN KIGOMA REGION TANZANIA DGD CODE: 1969911/12 NAVISION CODE: TAN 04 009 11 TFF Banana Cropping System (TAN 04 009 11) – final version after JLPC TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS................................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 6 1 SITUATION ANALYSIS.............................................................................................. 9 1.1 IMPORTANCE OF BANANA IN TANZANIA ..................................................................................9 1.2 THE TARGET AREA .....................................................................................................................10 1.3 BANANA IN FARM SYSTEMS OF NORTH WEST TANZANIA ....................................................12 1.4 CONSTRAINTS AND CHALLENGES ............................................................................................14 1.5 INNOVATION IN BANANA PRODUCTION .................................................................................17 2 STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS ............................................................................... 22 2.1 AXES OF INTERVENTION ...........................................................................................................22 2.2 BENEFICIARIES............................................................................................................................25 2.3 INSTITUTIONAL SETTING AND STAKEHOLDERS.....................................................................27 2.4 PROJECT LOCATION....................................................................................................................28 2.5 PROJECT DURATION ...................................................................................................................28 3 OPERATIONAL PLANNING .................................................................................. 30 3.1 OVERALL OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................30 3.2 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE ..................................................................................................................30 3.3 RESULTS (OUTPUTS)....................................................................................................................30 3.4 ACTIVITIES...................................................................................................................................32 3.5 INDICATORS AND MEANS OF VERIFICATION...........................................................................52 3.6 PRECONDITIONS, ASSUMPTIONS AND RISKS..........................................................................53 3.7 IMPLEMENTATION ACTORS / AGENCIES .................................................................................55 3.8 IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING..................................................................................................56 3.9 CONDITIONS OF SUSTAINABILITY ............................................................................................57 4 RESOURCE PLANNING.......................................................................................... 60 4.1 HUMAN RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................60 4.2 MATERIAL RESOURCES...............................................................................................................60 4.3 FINANCIAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................................61 5 TOTAL PLANTS PER YEAR IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES ........................... 63 5.1 MANAGEMENT MODALITIES .....................................................................................................63 5.2 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..........................................................................................................63 5.3 PROJECT COORDINATION STRUCTURES ..................................................................................64 5.4 FINANCIAL PROCEDURES...........................................................................................................67 5.5 MONITORING AND EVALUATION .............................................................................................73 5.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER BELGIAN-FUNDED PROJECTS ..............................................76 TFF Banana Cropping System (TAN 04 009 11) – final version after JLPC 2 5.7 CLOSURE OF THE OPERATION ..................................................................................................76 6 CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES ....................................................................................... 78 6.1 ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE..................................................................................78 6.2 SOCIAL ECONOMICS...................................................................................................................79 6.3 GENDER.......................................................................................................................................79 6.4 HIV-AIDS...................................................................................................................................80 6.5 RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ...............................................................................................................81 7 ANNEXES .................................................................................................................. 82 7.1 IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING ..................................................................................................82 7.2 LOGICAL FRAMEWORK...............................................................................................................83 7.3 DETAILED BUDGET PER RESULT AND ACTIVITY AND PER MANAGEMENT FORM..............87 7.4 JOB DESCRIPTION FOR LONG-TERM PERSONNEL ...................................................................91 TABLES TABLE 1. DISTRIBUTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS AND POPULATION BY RURAL DISTRICT, KAGERA REGION AND KIBONDO, 2002...........................................................................................10 TABLE 2. IMPORTANCE OF BANANA PRODUCTION BY DISTRICTS (2005)........................................13 TABLE 3. PROJECTION OF FARMER-BASED MULTIPLICATION SYSTEM.............................................31 TABLE 4. OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE INDICATORS..............................................................................52 TABLE 5. INSTITUTIONAL ACTORS AND STAKEHOLDERS AND ROLE IN IMPLEMENTATION ........56 TABLE 6. GENERAL BUDGET OF BELGIAN CONTRIBUTION .............................................................62 TABLE 7. ESTIMATED UNIT COSTS FOR RECURRENT INPUTS IN ACTIVITIES BUDGET...................62 TFF Banana Cropping System (TAN 04 009 11) – final version after JLPC 3 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ADB/F African Development Bank/Fund AIDS Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome ARDI Agricultural Research and Development Institute ASDP Agriculture Sector Development Programme ASDS Agriculture Sector Development Strategy ASLMs Agricultural Sector Lead Ministries ASSP Agricultural Services Support Programme BSF Belgian Survival Fund BTC Belgian Technical Cooperation BXW Banana Xanthomonas Wilt CBO Community-Based Organization CORDEMA Client-Oriented Research and Development Approach CRS Catholic Relief Services CSP Country Strategy Paper DADP District Agriculture Development Plan DADPs District Agriculture Development Plans DALDO District Agriculture and Livestock Development Officer DANIDA Danish International Development Agency DASIP District Agriculture Sector Investment Project DC/LGA District Council/ Local Government Authority DED District Executive Director DGCD Directorate General for Development Co-operation DPLO District Planning Officer EAHB East African Highland Bananas EU European Union EUR Euro FADECO Family Alliance for Development and Cooperation FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FBO Faith Based Organization FFS Farmer Field School FHIA Fundación Hondureña de Investigación Agrícola GDP Gross Domestic Product GoB Government of Belgium GoT Government of Tanzania HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IFPRI International Food Production Research Institute INIBAP International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain IPM Integrated Pest Management JAST Joint Assistance Strategy of Tanzania JLPC Joint Local Partner Committee KCDP Kagera Community Development Programme KoB Kingdom of Belgium KUL Katholieke Universiteit Leuven LGA Local Government Authority LGRP Local Government Reform Programme TFF Banana Cropping System (TAN 04 009 11) – final version after JLPC 4 MAFSC Ministry of Agriculture, Food security and Cooperatives MALI Muleba Association for Agriculture and Local Industries MFEA Ministry of Finance & Economic Affairs NAEP National Agricultural Extension Programme NARO National Agricultural Research Organization (Uganda) NFSP National Food Security Policy NGO Non-Governmental Organization NMB National Micro-finance Bank NPES National Poverty Eradication
Recommended publications
  • Overview of Tanzania's Mining Operations
    Public Disclosure Authorized SESA of the Tanzanian Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project Final Report May 2013 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by LUC in association with GEUS & Matrix Development Consultants Project Title: SESA of the Tanzanian Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project Client: Ministry of Energy and Minerals, Government of Tanzania Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by Principal 1 21/12/12 Draft Final Report LT, PN, SW, JT LT PN 2 02/05/13 Final Report LT, PN, SW, JT LT, NJ PN, NJ SESA of the Tanzanian Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project Final Report Prepared by LUC in association with GEUS & Matrix Development Consultants May 2013 Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 14 Great George Street London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Bristol BS1 5RH Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management Tel:0117 929 1997 Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology Fax:0117 929 1998 London NW1 1JD Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 LUC uses 100% recycled paper EMS 566057 Contents 1 Introduction 3 Introduction to the Minerals Sector 3 The Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project 5 Purpose of the Report 5 2 The SESA Process 7 The Role of SESA 7 Methodology Used 8 3 Background to the Minerals Sector 11 Overview of Tanzania’s Mineral Resource 11 Overview of Tanzania’s Mining Operations 12 Background Context to
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental-And-Social-Impact-Assessment-For-The-Rehabilitation-Of-Lusahunga
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF WORKS, TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION Public Disclosure Authorized APRIL 2020 Tanzania National Roads Agency (TANROADS) 3rd Floor, 10 Shaaban Robert Road/Garden Avenue Junction P. O. Box 11364, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Tel: + 255 22 2926001-6 Fax: + 255 22 2926011 Public Disclosure Authorized E-Mail: [email protected] ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED REHABILITATION OF LUSAHUNGA – RUSUMO ROAD (92KM) TO BITUMEN STANDARD Public Disclosure Authorized Submitted to: National Environment Management Council (NEMC) Regent Estate Plot No. 29/30, P. O. Box 63154 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Tel: +255 22 2774852 22 2774889/713 Fax: Fax +255 22 277 4901 E-mail: [email protected] Prepared by: Public Disclosure Authorized Dr. Rubhera R.A.M Mato. P. O. Box 35176, Dar es Salaam, Tel: +255 754 898592; E-mail: [email protected] ESIA Report for Lusahunga – Rusumo (92 Km) Road April, 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The proponent and the ESIA Team wish to express thanks and appreciation to all stakeholders who in one way or the other supported completion of this work. Special thanks to the Ngara and Biharamulo District Councils as well as Kagera Regional Secretariat Officials for their prompt assistance during the fieldwork. We are also thankful to the Engineering Design Team and other team members of the Consultant for their technical inputs. Last but not least, we thank the leadership of Ward Leaders and Local Communities in the project area for their cooperation and participation in the ESIA exercise. i | P a g e ESIA Report for Lusahunga – Rusumo (92 Km) Road April, 2020 STUDY TEAM Consultant’s Team for preparation of ESIA Environmentalist and ESIA Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugee and Development in Tanzania: an Exploration of Benefits of Refugee Presence on Local Communities a Case of North Western Tanzania
    Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) Vol.5, No.12, 2015 Refugee and Development in Tanzania: An Exploration of benefits of Refugee Presence on Local Communities A case of North Western Tanzania Andrew Stanley CHING’OLE 11 Assistant Lecturer, St. John’s University of Tanzania, Institute of Development Studies, P.O. Box 47, Dodoma – Tanzania Tel: +255756241071 ABSTRACT: Since its independence, Tanzania has been the location of choice for many refugees in the Great Lakes region of Eastern Africa. As one of the most impoverished countries in the world, mass refugee migrations such as those experienced in the 1990s alter Tanzania’s own plight for social and economic development. This study explores the effects that refugees have had upon host communities’ economy in North Western Tanzania. The study has shown that there is a variety of evidence to prove both positive and negative effects. Although in contrary to many attestations of most scholarly literatures the study has shown that the benefits that the refugees provide are greater than the liability that they pose. According to the findings of this study the presence of refugees in Tanzania has been shown to increase the economic capacity through infrastructure and employment opportunities. In addition, the influx has also increased the volume of trade and amount of income to host communities. A balance sheet is created in order to appraise the relative economic effects that the refugees have caused throughout the years. Such a balance sheet should be considered in the development and implementation of future refugee policies to ensure appropriate treatment of the refugees and the host population in addition to supporting national economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • SEEKING PROTECTION: Addressing Sexual and Domestic Violence in Tanzania===S Refugee Camps
    SEEKING PROTECTION: Addressing Sexual and Domestic Violence in Tanzania===s Refugee Camps Human Rights Watch Women===s Rights Division Human Rights Watch New York AAA Washington AAA London AAA Brussels Copyright 8 October 2000 by Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN:1-56432-247-5 Library of Congress Card number: 12017842 Cover photo by Women=s Commission for Refugee Women and Children Cover design by Rafael Jiménez Addresses for Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, NY 10118-3299 Tel: (212) 290-4700, Fax: (212) 736-1300, E-mail: [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20009 Tel: (202) 612-4321, Fax: (202) 612-4333, E-mail: [email protected] 33 Islington High Street, N1 9LH London, UK Tel: (171) 713-1995, Fax: (171) 713-1800, E-mail: [email protected] 15 Rue Van Campenhout, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: (2) 732-2009, Fax: (2) 732-0471, E-mail:[email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org Listserv address: To subscribe to the list, send an e-mail message to [email protected] with Asubscribe hrw-news@ in the body of the message (leave the subject line blank). Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Policy and Legal Reforms on a Pastoral System in Lower Kagera Sub-Basin, North Western Tanzania
    Impact of Policy and Legal Reforms on a Pastoral System in Lower Kagera Sub-Basin, North Western Tanzania Lwekaza J. A. Kisoza The Open University of Tanzania Institute of Continuing Education Email: [email protected] Abstract: A socio-economic study was conducted in the lower Kagera sub-basin in North Western Tanzania to assess the impact of land-use policies and legal reformson pastoral system. Questionnaire surveys and PRA approaches were employed to collect data in four districts: Muleba, Missenyi, Karagwe and Ngara in Kagera region. The main economic activities in the study area were small hold farming (74%), agro-pastoralism (48%) and pastoralism (4%). The majority own between 1 and 2 acres of land, held under customary regimes (60.3. There were experienced increasing land shortages (69.2%) mainly attributed to unfavourable legal and policy framework (96.4%). The main constraint faced by pastoralists was shortage of grazing land (52.9%). The structures established to administer land resources and resolve land-use conflicts were reported to be ineffectual. The area is facing increasing land-use conflicts that involve farmers against pastoralists, farmers against farmers, farmers against investors, and farmer against government agencies. A number of newly introduced policies and laws aiming at commercialization of pastoral system had led to expropriation of customary lands to new investors. The pastoral systems are now on transition, and increasingly becoming sedentarized. There are emerging commercial investors who were partitioning communal grazing lands and converting them into commercial ranches. In order to cope with changes it is recommended the interventions that will intensify the pastoral system by increasing both rangeland and livestock productivity and ensure sustainable rangeland health in Kagera sub- basin.
    [Show full text]
  • George Jambiya Simon Milledge Nangena Mtango TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa
    ‘NIGHT TIME SPINACH’ CONSERVATION AND LIVELIHOOD IMPLICATIONS OF WILD MEAT USE IN REFUGEE SITUATIONS IN NORTH-WESTERN TANZANIA George Jambiya Simon Milledge Nangena Mtango TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa Published by TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa. © 2007 TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa. All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa as the copyright owner. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF, IUCN – The World Conservation Union, or the Rufford Maurice Laing Foundation. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. TRAFFIC is UK Registered Charity No. 1076722. Suggested citation: Jambiya, G., Milledge, S.A.H. and Mtango, N. (2007). ‘Night Time Spinach’: Conservation and livelihood implications of wild meat use in refugee situations in north-western Tanzania. TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Key words: Wild meat, refugees, Tanzania. ISBN: 978-1-85850-231-1
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Priorities in Refugee Protection: the Rwandan Repatriation from Tanzania
    NEW ISSUES IN REFUGEE RESEARCH Working Paper No. 53 Changing priorities in refugee protection: the Rwandan repatriation from Tanzania Beth Elise Whitaker Department of Political Science George Washington University Washington, DC USA E-mail: [email protected] February 2002 These working papers are issued by the Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, and provide a means for UNHCR staff, consultants, interns and associates to publish the preliminary results of their research on refugee-related issues. The papers are written in a personal capacity and do not represent the official views of UNHCR. They are also available online under ‘Publications’ on the UNHCR website, http://www.unhcr.org ISSN 1020-7473 Introduction On December 5, 1996, the Tanzanian government and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) issued a joint statement that read, in part, “all Rwandese refugees in Tanzania are expected to return home by 31 December 1996.”1 That same day, UNHCR distributed information sheets to refugees about the repatriation exercise, including the immediate suspension of economic and agricultural activities in the camps. The camps had been home to more than half a million Rwandan refugees since 1994, when they fled civil war and an advancing rebel army at home. They were eventually joined in Tanzania by nearly 500,000 refugees from Burundi and Zaire.2 As a haven of peace in a troubled region, Tanzania had long hosted refugees from neighboring countries. By December 1996, however, patience seemed to have run out. 3 Upon receiving the repatriation announcement, many refugees wanted extra time to see how the integration of returnees from Zaire would unfold within Rwanda.4 Several wrote a letter to Tanzanian President Benjamin Mkapa requesting him to reconsider the December 31 deadline.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival and Accumulation Strategies at the Rural-Urban Interface in North-West Tanzania
    RURAL URBAN INTERFACE Survival and accumulation strategies at the rural-urban interface in north-west Tanzania Jonathan Baker SUMMARY: This paper presents empirical material collected in the small town of Biharamulo (population 20,000) and four surrounding villages in 1993. The study area is located in the Kagera Region of north-west Tanzania. The paper attempts to demonstrate how rural areas and small urban centres are eco- nomically interdependent. Biharamulo is a district headquarter town and fulfils, inter alia, important administrative, marketing, service and retailing functions. The paper discusses how the four villages interact with the town and illustrates how village households adopt a combination of survival and accumulation strategies including the use of rural and urban resources. The most successful village households appear to be those which use urban opportunities and assets (for example, urban employ- ment, urban house and shop ownership) to diversify income sources and thereby avoid the uncertainties of relying solely on market- able crop production for household security. As a backdrop to the whole discussion, an attempt is made to analyze the types of households which might be poor or, at least, susceptible to poverty. Dr. Jonathan Baker is Senior I. INTRODUCTION Research Fellow and leader of the Urban Development in Rural Context in Africa SMALL TOWNS AS potential catalysts for rural development in Research Programme at the Africa have not received the attention they deserve. Most devel- Scandinavian Institute of opment
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Energy Access in Three Regions of Tanzania Baseline Report for an Urban Grid Upgrading and Rural Extension Project
    Materialien Gunther Bensch Merle Kreibaum Tukae Mbegalo Jörg Peters Natascha Wagner The Status of Energy Access in Three Regions of Tanzania Baseline report for an urban grid upgrading and rural extension project Heft 111 Impressum Herausgeber RWI – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Hohenzollernstraße 1–3 | 45128 Essen, Germany Fon: +49 201–81 49-0 | E-Mail: [email protected] www.rwi-essen.de Vorstand Prof. Dr. Christoph M. Schmidt (Präsident) Prof. Dr. Thomas K. Bauer (Vizepräsident) Prof. Dr. Wim Kösters © RWI 2017 Der Nachdruck, auch auszugsweise, ist nur mit Genehmigung des RWI gestattet. RWI Materialien Heft 111 Schriftleitung: Prof. Dr. Christoph M. Schmidt Konzeption und Gestaltung: Julica Bracht, Claudia Lohkamp, Daniela Schwindt The Status of Energy Access in Three Regions of Tanzania ISSN 1612-3573 ISBN 978-3-86788-781-6 Materialien Gunther Bensch, Merle Kreibaum, Tukae Mbegalo, Jörg Peters, Natascha Wagner The Status of Energy Access in Three Regions of Tanzania Baseline report for an urban grid upgrading and rural extension project Heft 111 The Status of Energy Access in Three Regions of Tanzania Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der deutschen National- bibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über: http://dnb. ddb.de abrufbar. The evaluation consortium acknowledges the outstanding support of Stephen Kirama and his team at the Economics Department of the University of Dar es Salaam in conducting the original research on which this publication is based. Furthermore, we would like to thank Stephan Klasen and Maximiliane Sievert for their support and guidance. The views presented in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the consortium member organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    AFRICA REGION HUMAN DEVELOPMENT WO R KI N G PAPE R S S E R I E S Public Disclosure Authorized The ImpdCt of Adult Mortdlity on Primdry School Enrollment in Northwestern Tdnzdnid Public Disclosure Authorized - ~~~~23961 ,.'.;,iMarch ' 2002 9 X. ' 'F_ Public Disclosure Authorized ou79x1 W q7\ ti Xva/ S ,-. 1 _r~ ( ~~~~~~~~~ A. ...........V 4 >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ;1R i \ 1~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized Other Titles in This Series Dynamic Risk Management and the Poor-Developing a Social Protection Strategy for Africa Engaging with Adults-The Case for Increased Support to Adult Basic Education in Sub-Saharan Africa Inclure les adultes - Pour un appui a 1'6ducation de base des adultes en Afrique subsaharienne Enhancing Human Development in the HIPC/PRSP Context-Progress in the Africa Region during 2000 Early Childhood Development in Africa-Can We Do More for Less? A Look at the Impact and Implications of Preschools in Cape Verde and Guinea AIDS, Poverty Reduction and Debt Relief-A Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV/AIDS Programs into Development Instruments Systemic Shocks and Social Protection-Role and Effectiveness of Public Works Programs Social Protection of Africa's Orphans and Vulnerable Children-Issues and Good Practice Program Options Can Africa Reach the International Targets for Human Development? An Assessment of Progress towards the Targets of the 1998 Second Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD II) Education and Training in Madagascar-Towards a Policy Agenda for Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction
    [Show full text]
  • HIV/AIDS and STI Prevention and Care in Rwandan Refugee Camps in the United Republic of Tanzania
    HIV/AIDS and STI prevention and care in Rwandan refugee camps in the United Republic of Tanzania UNHCR UNAIDS/03.16E (English original, March 2003) ISBN 92-9173-162-5 © Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS UNAIDS concerning the legal status of any country, (UNAIDS) 2003. territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. All rights reserved. Publications produced by UNAIDS can be obtained from the UNAIDS Information Centre. The mention of specifi c companies or of certain Requests for permission to reproduce or translate manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are UNAIDS publications—whether for sale or for noncom- endorsed or recommended by UNAIDS in preference to mercial distribution—should also be addressed to the others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors Information Centre at the address below, or by fax, at and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary +41 22 791 4187, or e-mail: publicationpermissions@ products are distinguished by initial capital letters. unaids.org. UNAIDS does not warrant that the information The designations employed and the presentation contained in this publication is complete and correct of the material in this publication do not imply the and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of result of its use. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data HIV/AIDS and STI prevention and care in Rwandan refugee camps in the United Republic of Tanzania. 1. Acquired immunodefi ciency syndrome – therapy 2. HIV infections – therapy 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Biharamulo District Investment Profile
    Biharamulo District Investment Profile ISBN 978-9987-770-26-7 BIHARAMULO DISTRICT INVESTMENT PROFILE By Dr. Gratian Bamwenda, Dr. Oswald Mashindano, Mrs. Margareth Nzuki and Mr. Abdallah K. Hassan ISBN 978-9987-770-26-7 @ 2016 Economic and Social Research Foundation Biharamulo District Investment Profile - 2016 | i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments .........................................................................................................iii Summary ........................................................................................................................iv 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Approach ........................................................................................................ 2 2. OVERVIEW OF BIHARAMULO DISTRICT ........................................................... 3 3. INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES ......................................................................... 7 3.1 Major Investment Destinations ......................................................................... 7 3.2 The top priority investment areas ................................................................... 13 4. FACILITATION, PROCESSES AND REQUIREMENTS ...................................... 16 4.1 Facilitation ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]