Diane DeFriend Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Ultrasound  US – remains primary imaging modality for investigation of an adnexal mass

 Aim to characterise

 Benign

 Malignant

 Indeterminate

 ≈ 90% adnexal masses characterised by ultrasound alone Adnexal Masses- Why do we need to characterise Benign

• Conservative Management • Discharge / Follow up imaging • Surgery • Minimally invasive • Fertility sparing

Malignant

• Staging laparotomy / Cytoreductive surgery • Specialist gynaecological oncology surgeon • Cancer Centre AIMS

RECOGNISE FEATURES MALIGNANCY Avoid need for repeat surgery

RECOGNISE COMMON BENIGN MASSES Most adnexal masses benign May avoid unnecessary surgery

INDETERMINATE MASSES Role of follow up / alternative imaging

Different approaches to characterising adnexal masses Experienced examiner Subjective ‘pattern recognition’ approach superior Benign Ovarian Lesions

BIG FIVE

Corpus Luteum

Crenellated cyst

Low level echoes

Circumferential flow

Secretory endometrium Benign Adnexal Masses Simple Cysts

 Virtually exclude malignancy

 Large cysts - ensure not missing small nodules

 serous cystadenoma – occ present as simple cyst esp larger cysts / older women

 Most resolve 1-2 months - follow up  pre-menopausal > 5cm  Post-menopausal > 3cm

Haemorrhagic Cysts

 Varied appearance change blood products over time

 Typical appearances  reticular pattern (fibrin strands)-strong predictor  Clot – may simulate solid nodule  concave border  absence flow

 Atypical – premenopausal  Should resolve 1-2 cycles  Follow -up

Endometrioma Characteristic Atypical  Well defined cyst • ≈ 15% mural irregularity • Usually avascular – clot  Uni / multilocular • Rarely flow – endometrial  Homogenous low level echoes tissue - ‘ground glass’ appearance • Diffuse echoes  Hyperechoic wall foci • Dermoid Cyst • Mucinous ovarian tumour • Further imaging • Characteristic - haemorrhage Endometrioma MR T1 high signal

FS – more conspicuous excludes dermoid

T2 low signal (SHADING) complete loss signal dependent layering

Polycystic

 2003 Consensus report defined PCOS  2 of 3 criteria  Oligo and/or anovulation  Hyperandrogenism  Polycystic ovary – US

Polycystic Ovary  12+ follicles 2-9mm and/or ? ≥ 25 follicles - Dewailly et al  Ovarian volume >10cc 2014  Follicle distribution/stromal echogenicity not included 26 follicles , 18-35 yrs - Lujan et al 2013

Germ Cell Tumours – Cystic/Solid Mature (Dermoid Cyst )

 Variable appearance – internal composition

 Often specific features  Dermoid plug Rokitansky Nodule – echogenic nodule / dense well  Tip of iceberg sign defined shadowing

 Dermoid mesh

 Floating Balls

 Fat-Fluid level Echogenic mass (sebaceous material / hair ) ill defined shadowing obscures posterior border Mature Teratoma ( Dermoid Cyst)

 Dermoid Mesh  Multiple echogenic lines/dots  Hair fibres

 Floating Balls  Uncommon / Pathognomonic  Sebaceous material around focus debris/hair

 Fat fluid Level – non specific

 Often at least 2 characteristic features detected

 Further imaging  Atypical - characteristic for fat  Visualise other ovary

T2 T1 T1 FAT SAT

Benign Ovarian Lesions BIG FIVE

 Corpus Luteal Cysts Functional Cysts

 Haemorrhagic Cysts

 Endometriomas

 PCOS

 Dermoids Benign Extra- Ovarian Lesions

 Hydrosalpinx

 Para-ovarian Cysts

 Peritoneal Inclusion cysts Paraovarian cyst

 Broad ligament

 Paramesonephric, mesothelial , mesonephric remnants

 Usually simple Hydrosalpinx  Tubular

 Incomplete septations

 Indentations opposite sides of wall -waist sign

 Mural nodules –  cogwheel  beads on a string

 Echoes - pyosalpinx Peritoneal Inclusion Cyst

 Functioning ovary  Adhesions – surgery, endometriosis, PID  Cystic mass + septa  Shape – conforms to adjacent pelvic structures  NB – normal ovary within/ periphery mass Pseudocyst / Peritoneal Inclusion Cyst Pitfalls Pitfalls Bladder - TVS

Classification of Ovarian

• Serous Cystadenoma/Carcinoma EPITHELIAL • /Carcinoma TUMOURS • Endometrioid • Clear Cell 65-70% •

GERM CELL • Mature Teratoma (Dermoid) / Immature Teratoma TUMOURS • 15-20%

SEX CORD STROMAL • Granulosa Cell TUMOURS • Sertoli Leydig 5-10% •

Metastases 5-10 %

Classification of Ovarian Neoplasms

• Serous Cystadenoma / Carcinoma EPITHELIAL • Mucinous Cystadenoma / Carcinoma • Endometrioid TUMOURS • Clear Cell 65-70% • Brenner Tumour

85% malignant ovarian

Serous / Mucinous

Benign – Peak 30-40 years Malignant - Peak 6-7th decade

Cystic and Solid - varying amounts solid tissue

+/-Differentiation Epithelial Tumours - Cystic/Solid - Serous

 Predominantly cystic  Largely echo-free fluid  Unilocular/multilocular  Papillary projections  single best predictor of epithelial neoplasm

 60% benign (cystadenoma)  few/small papillary nodules  25% malignant ()  Malignant – more projections / solid tissue  15% borderline (resemble benign or malignant) Serous cystadenocarcinoma Epithelial Tumours - Cystic/Solid - Mucinous

 Multilocular Cystadenoma

 Echogenic fluid – mucin

 Benign – thin septa

Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma  Malignant – thick enhancing septa / solid elements

 20-25% ovarian tumours  80% benign  10% borderline  10% malignant Serous Mucinous

Bilaterality Rarely bilateral Ca2+ common psammomatous Ca2+ rare linear Peritoneal carcinomatosis Pseudomyoma peritonei Epithelial - Cystic / Solid Endometrioid Clear Cell  10-15% all ovarian cancers  5% all

 Almost always malignant  Malignant

 15-30% assoc endometrial Ca / hyperplasia  Assoc with endometriosis

 Most common neoplasm assoc with endometriosis Pitfalls

Decidualised Endometriotic Cyst

Hypertrophy stromal cells endometrium during pregnancy

Decidual change ectopic endometrium

Vascularised rounded papillary projections in cyst with low level echoes

Major contributory factor to incorrect diagnosis in pregnant women

Resoving at follow up - surgically proven Classification of Ovarian Neoplasms

• Serous Cystadenoma/Carcinoma EPITHELIAL • Mucinous Cystadenoma/Carcinoma TUMOURS • Endometrioid • Clear Cell 65-70% • Brenner Tumour

GERM CELL • Mature Teratoma (Dermoid) / Immature Teratoma TUMOURS • Dysgerminoma 15-20%

SEX CORD STROMAL • Granulosa Cell TUMOURS • Sertoli Leydig 5-10% • Fibroma Thecoma

Metastases 5-10 % Solid Masses - Regular

Regular solid masses often benign

• Pedunculated fibroid • Typically solid • “Picket fence” shadowing

• Ovarian fibroma • Solid mass • Marked acoustic shadowing (18-52%) Solid Masses – Regular Fibroma

SEX CORD • Granulosa Cell STROMAL • Sertoli Leydig TUMOURS • Fibroma Thecoma 5-10%  Almost always benign

 Middle age women

 Heterogenous/homogen ous solid mass

 Marked acoustic shadowing (18-52%)

 Differential  Pedunculated fibroids Brenner Tumour  Brenner Tumour Rarely malignant Solid Masses – Regular Fibroma Further imaging

• Large fibroids / shadowing – may limit TVS

• Atypical – Characteristic for fibrous tissue

• Visualise / relationship to uterus Solid Masses – Regular

MEIGS’ Syndrome

Ascites

Pleural Effusion

Benign ovarian tumour - Fibroma Solid masses - Malignant • Irregular solid mass suggests malignancy

• Epithelial neoplasms – cystic/solid rarely completely solid

• Solid/nearly solid malignancies • Metastases • Rare Tumours • Sex Cord Stromal Tumours • Malignant teratoma • Dysgerminoma

• Bilateral solid masses – • raise concern for metastases – • further imaging ? primary Krukenberg - gastric Sex Cord Stromal - Granulosa Cell Tumours

SEX CORD STROMAL • Granulosa Cell TUMOURS • Sertoli Leydig • Fibroma Thecoma 5-10%  Hormone secreting - oestrogen  Rare 3% ovarian malignancies  Peri /postmenopusal  Unilateral - 95%

 US appearances non specific  Cystic/solid - Solid

 1/3 endometrial hyperplasia  Up to 25% endometrial Ca Sex Cord Stromal - Fibrothecoma

SEX CORD • Granulosa Cell STROMAL • Sertoli Leydig TUMOURS • Fibroma Thecoma 5-10% •Mature Teratoma Solid masses – Malignant GERM CELL (Dermoid) / Immature TUMOURS Teratoma 15-20% •Dysgerminoma

Dysgerminoma 17 yr old Immature Teratoma 27 yr old

Dysgerminoma Immature Teratoma Most common < 30 years Most common – first two decades Usually solid Predominantly solid, cystic/solid

Raised AFP/Beta-hCG/LDH in some malignant germ cell tumours Features of Malignancy • Solid Component • within cystic mass • Irregular solid mass / wall

• Thick Septations

Borderline • Presence of Flow

• Ascites

• Peritoneal nodules

• Metastases /Nodes Solid Component Most important predictor of malignancy

Malignant Benign

• Several nodules solid • Solitary / small tissue papillary nodule – serous cystadenoma • Echogenicity similar to cyst wall • Hyperechoic with shadowing – dermoid • Often convex / irregular • Clot – concave border / avascular • Flow Septations  Septa in cystic mass suggest neoplasm  Increased risk malignancy  > 2-3mm  flow

Fibrin strands Thin weak reflectors Numerous Do not traverse entire cyst

Adjacent cysts may mimic Doppler  Colour doppler –qualitative  Flow in solid component / septum

 Power doppler –  increased sensitivity / similar specificity

 Spectral doppler  Confirm presence flow

 Malignant tumours  Low resistance flow  lower PI & RI’s, higher velocity  RI < 0.4; PI <1.0 prev cited as cut-off for malignancy  Overlap with benign – little role characterisation Ascites

 Indirect indicator of malignancy

 Small amount fluid in Pouch of Douglas  normal in premenopausal women  >15mm AP diameter

 Pre-existing illness eg cirrhosis

 Echogenic fluid - ruptured cyst/torsion

 Meig’s Syndrome – ascites + pleural effusion + fibroma Indeterminate Masses Ultrasound  Typical benign lesions  Sensitive – malignancy

 Many benign lesions demonstrate features malignancy  Solid areas / septations / flow  Tubo-ovarian abscess  Cystadenofibroma

 Borderline tumours Risk of Malignancy Index Feature RMI 1 Score Ultrasound features: 0=none •Multilocular cyst 1=one abnormality •Solid areas 3=2 or more abnormalities U •Bilateral lesions Score •Ascites •Intra-abdominal metastases

M •Pre-menopausal 1 score •Post menopausal 3 CA125 U/ml

RMI score = ultrasound x menopausal x CA125 level in U/ml

Sensitivity 85% Specificity 97% Triage using RMI

Risk RMI Women (%) Risk of cancer (%) Low <25 40 <3 Moderate 25-200 30 20 High >200 30 75

High RMI score > 200 - referral to specialist centre (SIGN Guidelines 2012)

Intermediate RMI score 25-200 – MRI often considered appropriate

RMI – heavily influenced by CA 125

CA 125 – may be elevated by benign disease esp pre-menopausal

RMI – recommended by RCOG and systematic review 2009 Geomini P et al The Accuracy of Risk Scores in Predicting Ovarian Malignancy: A Systematic Review Obstetrics & Gynecology; Volume 113 : 2, (Part 1), February 2009, pp 384-394 Simple Rules Developed as part of the IOTA (International Ovarian Tumour Analysis) study

Prospective, multicentre, European study patients with adnexal masses, 21 centres, 9 countries 1999-2017

Simple rules based on clearly defined US features

BENIGN - B RULES MALIGNANT - M RULES

• Unilocular cyst • Irregular solid tumour • Presence solid components where • Ascites largest solid component < 7mm • At least four papillary • Presence acoustic shadowing structures • Smooth multilocular tumour with • Irregular multilocular solid largest diameter <100mm tumour with largest diameter • No blood flow ≥ 100mm • Very strong blood flow Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Volume 41, Issue 1, pages 9-20, 25 DEC 2012 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12323 Slides – Ligita Jokubkiene Jan 2013 UOG Journal club A mass is unclassifiable if no M or B features or both Simple Rules

 Could be applied in 77%

 2 step strategy – Simple Rules + subjective assessment by experienced examiner if unclassifiable ( MDT )

 90% sensitivity and 93% specificity to detect ovarian malignancy

 Equivalent to expert subjective assessment in all (sensitivity 90% /specificity 93%)

 misclassified fewer stage 1 malignancies than did RMI and measurement of CA125.

 UK - RCOG included simple rules in 2011 guideline for evaluating ovarian pathology in premenopausal women

Conclusion

Clinical , Pre/Post Menopausal CA125 US

Adnexal Mass Adnexal Mass Adnexal mass Likely Malignant Indeterminate Likely benign

Staging Characterisation Follow up