DOCSLIB.ORG

Checklist of Clark County, Nv Damselflies And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Checklist of Clark County, Nv Damselflies And CHECKLIST OF CLARK COUNTY, NV DRAGONFLIES- ANISOPTERA – 23 likely represent accidental occurrences - as DAMSELFLIES AND DRAGONFLIES -46 species opposed to being a resident species within the species. Compiled by Bruce Lund; updated County. to 20 July, 2009. DARNERS – AESHNIDAE – 4 species - Variable darner (Aeshna interrupta ) Most species are under-reported, reflecting the DAMSELFLIES – ZYGOPTERA -23 - Common green darner (Anax junius) relatively small number of amateur and species - Giant darner (Anax walsinghami) professional biologists that have been looking - Blue-eyed darner (Rhionaeschna (Aeschna) for them in the field and reporting their BROAD-WINGED DAMSELS – multicolor) discoveries. Thus, anyone interested in CALOPTERYGIDAE – 2 species dragonflies and damselflies can contribute to - American rubyspot (Hetaerina americana) CLUBTAILS – GOMPHIDAE – 3 species discoveries of new species and improved - Canyon rubyspot (Hetaerina vulnerata) - White-belted ringtail (Erpetogomphus documentation of under-reported species. compositus) POND DAMSELS – COENAGRIONIDAE - Gray sanddragon (Progomphus borealis) 21 species - Russet-tipped clubtail (Stylurus plagiatus) - California dancer (Argia agrioides) - Paiute dancer (Argia alberta) SKIMMERS- LIBELLULIDAE – 16 species SHORTHAND OBSERVATION SYMBOLS: - Emma’s dancer (Argia emma) - Pale-faced clubskimmer (Brechmorhoga ^ = Male + = Female - Lavender dancer (Argia hinei) mendax) ++ = pair in tandem $ = pair in copula - Kiowa dancer (Argia immunda) - Western pondhawk (Erythemis collocata) OS = female ovipositing solo - Powdered dancer (Argia moesta) - Eastern pondhawk (Erythemis simplicicollis) OT = female ovipositing in tandem - Aztec dancer (Argia nahauna) - Comanche skimmer (Libellula comanche) - Blue-ringed dancer (Argia sedula) - Widow skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) DATE:_____________________________ - Vivid dancer (Argia vivida) - Twelve-spotted skimmer (Libellula pulchella) - Double-striped bluet (Enallagma basidens) - Flame skimmer (Libellula saturata) TIME:______________________________ - Boreal bluet (Enallagma boreale) - Roseate skimmer (Orthemis ferruginea) - Tule bluet (Enallagma carunculatum) - Blue dasher (Pachydiplax longipennis) WEATHER:_________________________ - Familiar bluet (Enallagma civile) - Wandering glider (Pantala flavescens) - Arroyo bluet (Enallagma praevarum) - Spot-winged glider (Pantala hymenaea) OBSERVERS:_______________________ - Desert forktail (Ischnura barberi) - Mexican amberwing (Perithemis intensa) - Pacific forktail (Ischnura cervula) - Desert whitetail (Plathemis (Libelulla) - Mexican forktail (Ischnura demorsa) subornata) - Black-fronted forktail (Ischnura denticollis) - Variegated meadowhawk (Sympetrum - Citrine forktail (Ischnura hastata) corruptum) LOCATION:_________________________ - Rambur’s forktail (Ischnura ramburii) - Black saddlebags (Tramea lacerata) - Desert forktail (Telebasis salva) - Red saddlebags (Tramea onusta) ____________________________________ NOTE: This list is compiled from a variety of publications. Some species have been reported from a single or a very few observations and See other side of checklist for more information RESOURCES for dragonfly and damselfly Stoke’s Beginner’s Guide to Dragonflies, identification including color photos: Blair Nikula & Jackie Sones, Little Brown, 2002. Excellent introduction to common BOOKS dragonflies and damselflies of North America. Dragonflies and Damselflies of the West, Excellent photos and illustrations. Dennis Paulson, Princeton Press, 2009. The newest and most comprehensive field guide for Dragonflies through Binoculars: A field the southwest. Includes photographs of both guide to the dragonflies of North America, sexes of all species, range maps, written Sidney Dunkle, Oxford University Press, 2000. descriptions including similar species. Limited to dragonflies (no damselflies), but a good reference non-the-less. Photographs of all The Dragonflies and Damselflies of North American dragonfly species, males and California, Tim Maniolis, University of females. California Press, 2003. This is the guide I carry in the field. Excellent illustrations and Dragonflies - Wild Guide, Cynthia Berger, information and it includes all southern Nevada Stackpole Books, 2004. A delightful popular species. book, written with a wonderful sense of wonder about these marvelous creatures. Obtain a copy Common Dragonflies of California, A from the Clark County Library and be Beginner’s Pocket Guide, Kathy Biggs, Azalea forewarned that you may get hooked! Creek Publishing, 2000. A compact guide with photographs to our common dragonflies. WEBSITES Inexpensive. http://www.odonatacentral.org See dragonfly and damselfly photos from the Muddy River Dragonflies of California and Common Valley under Bruce Lund’s name. Dragonflies of the Southwest, A Beginner’s Pocket Guide. Kathy Biggs, Azalea Creek http://southwestdragonflies.net Publishing, 2006. An update to the above book expanded beyond California to include www.nearctica.com common southwest species. www.dragonflies.org Dragonflies and Damselflies of Texas and the South-Central United States, John C. www.aeshna.com Abbott, Princeton Press, 2005. A technical reference, but well illustrated with photos, illustrations, and natural history information. It includes most of our southern Nevada species, but some are omitted as the range of this book is a few states to our west. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Damselfly, (Brauer), (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae) Insects, the Male
    Odonatologica 34(4): 387-396 December I, 2005 Postcopulatory guardingbehaviour ina territorial damselfly, Pseudagrionp. pilidorsum(Brauer), for submergedovipositing females (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae) K. Matsubara¹* and M.N Hironaka² 1 Department of AppliedBiological Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Saga University, Honjo 1, Saga, 840-8502, Japan 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Handayama 1-20-1, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan Received September29, 2004 / Revised and Accepted April22, 2005 The postcopulatory mate guardingbehaviours by territorial and non-territorial 3 3 for submergedovipositing $ 9 were investigatedin the field. After copulations, 9 9 in tandem began to ovipositat the water surface and thereafter they usually submerged completely underwater. The 9 oftenrepeated the submergence and emergence at sev- eral oviposition sites. When the 9 submerged completely,the 3 released her without submergence and rested above the water surface duringoviposition (non-submerged guarding), or the 3 submerged completely and remained in tandem, whether only at first or for the duration of the oviposition (submerged guarding). Territorial 3 3 always performed non-submergedguarding when the 9 oviposited inside their ter- ritories. The non-submergedguardinginside the territory might allow the territorial 3 both to guard the ovipositing 9 and to maintain his territory. On the other hand, when the 9 oviposited inside another 3’s territories, territorial and non-territorial 3 3 exhibited both non-submerged guardingand submerged guarding. Thus, P. p. pilidorsum 6 6 may adopt either submerged guarding or non-submerged guarding in in the of takeover of the 9 rival 3 3 response to change probability a emerged by inside another 3 ’s territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Progomphus Obscurus (Common Sanddragon)
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Progomphus obscurus (Common Sanddragon) Priority 3 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Insecta (Insects) Order: Odonata (Dragonflies And Damselflies) Family: Gomphidae (Clubtails) General comments: Only 8 modern waterbodies; southern distribution vulnerable Species Conservation Range Maps for Common Sanddragon: Town Map: Progomphus obscurus_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Progomphus obscurus_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: Progomphus obscurus is listed as a species of Special Concern in Maine. Recent Significant Declines: NA Regional Endemic: NA High Regional Conservation Priority: NA High Climate Change Vulnerability: NA Understudied rare taxa: NA Historical: NA Culturally Significant: NA Habitats Assigned to Common Sanddragon: Formation Name Boreal Upland Forest Macrogroup Name Boreal Upland Forest Formation Name Freshwater Aquatic Macrogroup Name Lakes and Ponds Macrogroup Name Rivers and Streams Stressors Assigned to Common Sanddragon: No Stressors Currently Assigned to Common Sanddragon or other Priority 3 SGCN. Species Level Conservation Actions Assigned to Common Sanddragon: No Species Specific Conservation Actions Currently Assigned to Common Sanddragon or other Priority 3 SGCN. Conservation Actions Associated with the Lacustrine Odonates Guild: Conservation Action Category: Research Biological Priority: high Type: new Prepare a statewide atlas and conservation
    [Show full text]
  • A General Explanation for the Persistence of Reproductive Interference
    vol. 194, no. 2 the american naturalist august 2019 Note A General Explanation for the Persistence of Reproductive Interference Jonathan P. Drury,1,* Christopher N. Anderson,2 Maria B. Cabezas Castillo,3 Jewel Fisher,3 Shawn McEachin,3 and Gregory F. Grether3 1. Department of Biosciences, Durham University, DurhamDH13LE,UnitedKingdom; 2.Departmentof Biological Sciences, Dominican University, River Forest, Illinois 60305; 3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095 Submitted September 17, 2018; Accepted February 22, 2019; Electronically published June 13, 2019 Online enhancements: appendix. Dryad data: https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.63mk0ks. abstract: Reproductive interference is widespread, despite the the- kirch 2008). In the face of such costs, current theory predicts oretical expectation that it should be eliminated by reproductive char- local extinction of one or more species (i.e., reproductive ex- acter displacement (RCD). A possible explanation is that females of clusion; Kuno 1992; Liou and Price 1994; Hochkirch et al. sympatric species are too similar phenotypically for males to distin- 2007; Gröning and Hochkirch 2008; Pfennig and Pfennig guish between them, resulting in a type of evolutionary dilemma or 2012; Kishi and Nakazawa 2013; Grether et al. 2017; but catch-22, in which reproductive interference persists because male see Ruokolainen and Hanski 2016) or evolutionary diver- mate recognition (MR) cannot evolve until female phenotypes diverge gence in traits involved in mate recognition (i.e., reproduc- further, and vice versa. Here we illustrate and test this hypothesis with fl tive character displacement; Brown and Wilson 1956; Hoch- data on rubyspot damsel ies (Hetaerina spp.).
    [Show full text]
  • MACROTHEMIS FALLAX, ANEW SPECIES of DRAGONFLY from CENTRAL AMERICA (ANISOPTERA: LIBELLULIDAE), with a KEY to MALE MACROTHEMIS Ab
    International Journal of Odonatology 1 (2): 137-153, 1998. © 1998 Backhuys Publishers. 137 MACROTHEMIS FALLAX, ANEW SPECIES OF DRAGONFLY FROM CENTRAL AMERICA (ANISOPTERA: LIBELLULIDAE), WITH A KEY TO MALE MACROTHEMIS Michael L. May Department of Entomology, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8524, U.S. A Received 24 February 1998; revised 8 July 1998; accepted 10 July 1998 Key words: Odonata, Abstract Macrothemis fa/lax spec. nov is described and figured from males collected in Belize and central Panama. It is apparently closely related to the widespread species, M. pseudimitans Calvert, 1898, with which it has hitherto been confused. These two species differ in shape of the cerci and epiproct, metafemoral armature, and thoracic and tibial coloration. A key to males of the genus, based largely on literature sources, is also provided. Introduction The genus Macrothemis is almost exclusively Neotropical, although a few species range northward into northern Mexico and the southwestern United States (Needham & Westfall, 1955). It comprises 39 or 40 species (Bridges, 1994, following Garrison, 1991, placed M. valida Navas, 1916, in Brechmorhoga, a plausible but so far unsubstantiated transfer), including the one described here. The latter is typical of the genus in that the inferior tooth of each tarsal claw is enlarged and its tip extends beyond that of the superior tooth. Thus the placement in Macrothemis rather than Brechmorhoga is clearly warranted, although the trigonal interspace of one forewing of the holotype is widened distally more than is usual in Macrothemis (Donnelly, 1984). The last comprehensive treatment of the genus was that of Ris (1913); although still very useful, this work is seriously outdated owing to the subsequent description of 15 species (Belle, 1983, 1987; Costa 1990, 1991; Donnelly, 1984; Gonzalez, 1992; Navas, 1916, 1918; Racenis, 1957; Ris, 1919; Santos, 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R
    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R. and Zeuss, D. 2016. Colour lightness of dragonfly assemblages across North America and Europe. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.02578 Supplementary material Appendix 1 Figures A1–A12, Table A1 and A2 1 Figure A1. Scatterplots between female and male colour lightness of 44 North American (Needham et al. 2000) and 19 European (Askew 1988) dragonfly species. Note that colour lightness of females and males is highly correlated. 2 Figure A2. Correlation of the average colour lightness of European dragonfly species illustrated in both Askew (1988) and Dijkstra and Lewington (2006). Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Note that the extracted colour values of dorsal dragonfly drawings from both sources are highly correlated. 3 Figure A3. Frequency distribution of the average colour lightness of 152 North American and 74 European dragonfly species. Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Rugs at the abscissa indicate the value of each species. Note that colour values are from different sources (North America: Needham et al. 2000, Europe: Askew 1988), and hence absolute values are not directly comparable. 4 Figure A4. Scatterplots of single ordinary least-squares regressions between average colour lightness of 8,127 North American dragonfly assemblages and mean temperature of the warmest quarter. Red dots represent assemblages that were excluded from the analysis because they contained less than five species. Note that those assemblages that were excluded scatter more than those with more than five species (c.f. the coefficients of determination) due to the inherent effect of very low sampling sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline for UMR Annual Report
    Integrated Science Assessment for the Upper Muddy River, Clark County, Nevada Wetland downstream of the Muddy River & California Wash junction. Photo: Louis Provencher, 2003 Annual Report to the Clark County MSHCP, February, 2004 by Louis Provencher1 The Nature Conservancy, One East First Street, Suite 1007, Reno, NV 89509 [email protected] Rob Andress Otis Bay Riverine Consultants, 1049 South 475 West, Farmington, UT 84025 [email protected] Contract #: 2003-TNC-1-A 1 Citation: Provencher, L. and R. Andress. 2004. Integrated Science Assessment for the Upper Muddy River, Clark County, Nevada. Annual report to the Clark County MSHCP, Nevada. The Nature Conservancy, Reno, Nevada. Annual Report: Integrated Science Assessment for the Upper Muddy River Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. STUDY AREA AND CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE............................................................................... 4 2.2. OBJECTIVES.......................................................................................................................................... 4 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 6 3.1 SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE REVIEW.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata
    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 edition published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Tramea carolina (Carolina Saddlebags), Cabin Lake, Aiken Co., South Carolina, 13 May 2008, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98 Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 457 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 103 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Description of Progomphus Bellei (KNOPF & TENNESSEN
    Odonalologica 22(3): 373-378 September 1. 1993 The larvaof ProgomphusbelleiKnopf & Tennessen (Anisoptera: Gomphidae) K.J. Tennessen 1949 Hickory Avenue, Florence, AL 35630, United States Received January 28, 1993 / Accepted February 26, 1993 of Larvae P. bellei are very similar morphologically to the other eastern U.S. alachuensis and Progomphus spp., Byers obscurus (Ramb.). Lateral spinesare present on abdominal segments 5-9, dorsal hooks are present on segments 1-9, and lateral brown the abdomen. P. bellei distinct markings are present on larvae are in having a longer dorsal hook on the ninth abdominal segment (0.45-0.60 mm vs. 0.17-0.40 mm and and in alachuensis ohscurus), longer cerci (1.10-1.37 mm vs. 0.80-1.10 in ala- chuensis and ohscurus). Also, the fourth antennal segment of bellei is about 1/3 the length of the third segment (0.31-0.36), whereas this ratio is greater in ohscurus (0.37- -0.47). INTRODUCTION In the original description of Progomphus bellei (KNOPF & TENNESSEN, 1980), we stated that the species had been reared and the larva wouldbe described later. Since then I have collected additional specimens of P. bellei and have studied variation in certain characters. The larva of P. bellei is herein described, and characteristics are given by which it can be distinguished from larvae of P. alachuensis Byers and P. obscurus (Rambur). DESCRIPTION Material. — UNITED STATES, Florida; Leon Co., Silver Lake, 25-III-1985, 11 final instars, - 9 F-l instars, KJT; Calhoun Co., JuniperCreek, Hwy 20, I8-III-1974, 1 final instar, KJT; - Liberty Co., Mystic Lake, Hwy 12, S ofBristol, 17-III-I973, I reared, KJT & K.W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Mahanadi River, Cuttack, India
    Journal of Applied and Natural Science 10 (3): 958 - 963 (2018) ISSN : 0974-9411 (Print), 2231-5209 (Online) journals.ansfoundation.org Macroinvertebrates and its impact in assessing water quality of riverine system: A case study of Mahanadi river, Cuttack, India Ishita Ganguly* Article Info Amity Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Amity University, Noida 201313 (Uttar Pradesh), DOI:10.31018/jans.v10i3.1817 India. Received: June 30, 2018 Lipika Patnaik Revised: July 25, 2018 Environmental Science Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Ravenshaw University, Accepted: August 5, 2018 Cuttack-753003 (Odisha), India Susri Nayak Environmental Science Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack-753003 (Odisha), India How to Cite Ganguly, I. et al. (2018). *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Macroinvertebrates and its impact in assessing water Abstract quality of riverine system: The aim of this study was to identify the diverse macroinvertebrates present in river Ma- A case study of Mahanadi hanadi, Cuttack in India and to evaluate the role of macroinvertebrates in assessing river river, Cuttack, India. Jour- water quality and pollution level. We conducted field study of the river at Cuttack (85° nal of Applied and Natural 46’21.29” E 20°28’15.81” N & 85°49’45.23” E 20°30’50.00” N) during 2013-2014 and col- Science, 10(3): 958 - 963 lected aquatic invertebrate samples from 12 stations on river basin. The samples were analysed to explore the various families of Macroinvertebrates communities present in river Mahanadi, to examine the status of water quality of the river using biological indica- tors, to determine whether there are relationships between water chemistry and presence of typical macroinvertebrates and to develop a Macroinvertebrates based index to bio- assessment of Mahanadi River.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata, 2021 1 Each Species Entry in the Checklist Is a Paragraph In- Table 2
    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009; updated February 2011, February 2012, October 2016, November 2018, and February 2021. Copyright © 2021 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009, 2011, 2012, 2016, 2018, and 2021 editions published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Male Calopteryx aequabilis, River Jewelwing, from Crab Creek, Grant County, Washington, 27 May 2020. Photo by Netta Smith. 1 1724 NE 98th Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 471 species of North American Odonata (Canada and the continental United States) considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approximate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION We publish this as the most comprehensive checklist Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, of all of the North American Odonata. Muttkowski with number of species. (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Anisoptera and Zygoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Needham, Westfall, and May (2014) and West- fall and May (2006), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 Bulletin of the Oregon Entomological Society
    Summer 2011 Bulletin of the Oregon Entomological Society Notes on the Status of Butterfly Populations in NW Oregon David V. McCorkle I parked my vehicle in the forest shade near Pedee Creek in tions of S. zerene bremneri, the inland subspecies of the threat- Polk County. I took out my insect net and walked a few paces to ened Oregon Silverspot, S. z. hippolyta, went extinct.) In the late the edge of the open field, hoping to at least see another female 1960s a farmer plowed under his violet rich hillside just a mile Puget Sound Fritillary, Speyeria cybele pugetensis. This is the or so northwest of Monmouth. After that the local population exact spot that, two years previously, I had taken the only other of pugetensis disappeared. What caused the disappearance of the female I had ever seen in this population. MacDonald Forest populations (at least at Sulphur Springs) in about 2005 remains a mystery as does the cause of the disap- The males of this species freely patrol forest openings, such as pearance of the Ritner Creek population last seen in 2003. roadsides, and are not uncommon at this site. But the mated females mostly stay in the woods where the species’ host violet, And it is this last event that is of most pertinence in our present Viola glabella, grows. They apparently fly up into the sunlit forest context, for this is the site of my present experiment. The Ritner canopy on cooler days to bask as needed to maintain a body Creek drainage is the next valley to the south of Pedee Creek temperature allowing their egg-laying activities in the shade be- which is where pugetensis persists at least to this writing.
    [Show full text]