DOCSLIB.ORG

California Geography GEOG 140 Intro to California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Geography GEOG 140 Intro to California California Geography GEOG 140 Intro to California • “The Golden State” • Spanish maps from 1560s (Nueva; Alta) • Over 100 indigenous languages (300,000 people) prior to European Contact California Facts • 31st US State (September 9, 1850) • Capital City: Sacramento • Largest City: Los Angeles • 2016 Estimated Population (US Census): 39,250,017 • Canada has 35 million people • Largest US state by population, third largest by land area California Political Geography • 58 Total Counties • “Northern California” versus “Southern California” • Vernacular regions • SoCal… 10 southern most counties??? California’s Cultural Situation • High degrees of isolation • Tough terrine encourages diversification • Spanish Presidio-mission-pueblo plan to settle Coastal Valleys • Mexican control after 1822 • Mid 1800s “Gold Rush” drives (English speaking) American settlement California Location • Geographic Center – Madera County • Latitude 37°, 9’, 23” N • Longitude 119°, 26’, 59.3” W • 32°, 30’ N – Baja California Border • 42° N – Oregon Border • 120° W – Nevada Border; 114° W – Arizona Border (Colorado River) • 124° W – Near Eureka (Pacific Ocean) Extreme Vertical Relief in California • Mt. Whitney: 14,495 ft • Death Valley, Near Badwater Basin: -282 ft Sequoia National Park • Tallest living organisms on Earth! $$$ • California is the richest state in the US! • GDP of $2.5 trillion (2015) • 6th largest global GDP • USA, China, Japan, Germany, UK… California California’s Economic Situation • Pacific Rim (countries on coasts of Pacific Ocean) • China, Japan, and South Korea • Trade with Asia California’s Physical Situation • Tectonics! - Several plate boundaries involved • Latitude, landforms and currents • Extremely diverse climate distributions and biomes Human Environment Interactions in California • Landscape modification… e.g. Imperial Valley (AC and water) • Valleys and basins preferred for settlement (cismontane) • Coastal climates preferred for large populations • Access to irrigation via canal or ground water necessary for most farming • Recreate agricultural practices found in other parts for world with similar climates (Oranges, Sudan Grass, Dates) Settlement and Population Density • Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose… three largest cities, part of three largest metropolitan systems California’s Physiographic Regions Mountains Around Us in So Cal… • Peninsular Ranges • Santa Ana, San Jacinto, Temescal, Perris Block and Laguna Mountains • Transverse Ranges • Santa Ynez, San Rafael, Sierra Madre, Topatopa, Santa Susana, Santa Monica, San Bernardino and San Gabriel Mountains Northwestern California and the Klamath Mountains • Counties: Del Norte, Siskiyou, Humboldt, Trinity, Mendocino, Shasta and Tehama • Major cities: Eureka, Arcata, Fortuna and Crescent City • Klamath Mountains – Subduction Zone with metamorphic rock (very rugged) • High degrees of erosion with dendritic drainage • Heavily forested (especially coastal ranges) North/Central California, Southern Cascades • Counties: Siskiyou, Shasta • Major City: Redding • Notable composite volcanoes • Mt. Shasta (second largest volcano in Cascades) • Some active volcanism (Mt. Lassen, erupted in 1917) • Glacial landscapes • More drier and continental climate than Klamaths The Northeast and Modoc Plateau • Counties: Modoc, Lassen, Plumas • Major city: Susanville • Volcanic mountains, but smaller than Cascades • Aspen Forest at higher elevations • Basalt lava flows • In two rain shadows, so low elevations are dry • Economic isolation and low population density Basin and Range • Counties: Mono, Inyo • Major settlement: Mammoth Lakes • Horst Graben landscape • Rain shadow of the Sierras • Mammoth Mountain and Mono Lake • Tourism major economic driver Sierra Nevada • Counties: Plumas, Sierra, Butte, Yuba, Nevada, Placer, El Dorado, Amador, Alpine, Calaveras, Tuolumne, Mariposa, Madera, Fresno, Tulare, Kern • Cities Paradise, South Lake Tahoe, Truckee • Largest Mountain Range in CA • Classic rain show environment • Vertical zonation leads to a diversity of climates • Snow pack extremely important for State’s water budget • Tourism in Lake Tahoe and Yosemite Sierra Nevada Southern California Deserts • 20 percent of California • “Transmontane” Southern California • 2 Major zones: Mojave Desert and Colorado Desert Mojave Desert • Counties: Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino • Cities: Palmdale, Victorville, Apple Valley • High Desert with deep valleys • Salt flats common (high evaporation, mineral rich water) • Cooler than the Colorado overall, due to higher elevation • Joshua Tree National Park • Mining and military activities Colorado Desert • Counties: Imperial, Riverside, San Diego • Major Cities: Indio, Cathedral City, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, El Centro, Coachella, Calexico • Low Desert • Hotter, lower and drier than the Mojave • 5 inches of rain per year • Temps can hold in the 110s in the day and 80s at night • Heavily irrigated (long growing season) • More settlement than Mojave Desert Peninsular Ranges and South Coast • Greater San Diego, San Diego County • Major Cities: San Diego, Chula vista, Oceanside, Escondido • Military, Tourism, Retirement and Real Estate • Slightly drier climate than the rest of the So Cal coast • Most settlement on the windward side of mountains Inland Empire • Counties: San Bernardino, Riverside • Cities: Riverside, San Bernardino, Fontana, Moreno Valley • Urban sprawl extending east from Los Angeles • Citrus groves, Csa Climates to semi desert • Retirement communities and commuters • Issues with smog from the L.A. Basin • Rapid population growth until 2008 Orange County • Major Cities: Anaheim, Santa Ana, Irvine, Huntington Beach, Garden Grove • Citrus growing • Suburbs of LA, that have grown into urban systems in and of themselves • Major urban establishment in 1960s and 1970s • Slightly flatter landscape than LA and SD counties until Santa Ana Mountains Los Angeles Area • LA is the second largest city in the US (3,971,883 people) • LA Metro Area has 12,828,837 people! • More people than any US state except for Texas, Florida and New York • Urban sprawl, low rise buildings extending out from downtown skyscrapers • Agglomeration economies • Extreme income inequality Transverse Ranges (North of LA) • Counties: Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los Angeles • Major Cities: Oxnard, Santa Clarita, Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley • Agriculture meets industry • Many residents commute into LA • Santa Anna Winds cause winter heatwaves (wild fire hazard) • Universities and Beaches (Channel Islands) • Tourism (Lake Arrowhead; Big Bear) • Pivot Point… San Andreas meets Garlock Fault Central Coast and Coast Ranges • Counties: Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Alameda, San Francisco, Contra Costa • Cities: Salinas, Santa Maria, Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo • Coastal mountains follow the San Andreas fault, eventually blending with the Klamath Mountains • Lots of marine life, and historically good fishing • “Big Sur” Coastline • Mediterranean Csb climates • Excellent for grapes San Francisco Bay Area • Major Cities: San Jose, San Francisco, Oakland, Fremont, Santa Rosa, Hayward, Sunnyvale • Silicon Valley (High Tech) • An LA alternative, with much less traffic • Very expensive • Starting to experience suburban sprawl (San Jose) • People are priced out of down town SF The Central Valley • Counties: Tehama, Glenn, Butte, Colusa, Sutter, Yuba, Placer, Yolo, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Tulare, Kings and Kern • Cities: Fresno, Sacramento, Bakersfield, Stockton, Modesto • Huge flat basin with two major sections: Sacrament Valley and San Joaquin Valley • Highly productive agricultural area with ground water reserves.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fresno County Community Health Needs Assessment 2020 | Page II
    Fresno County Community Health Needs Assessment Fresno County Community Health Needs Assessment 2020 | Page II Table of Contents Figures III Tables IV Acknowledgments V Executive Summary VI Background 1 Approach 1 Methods 4 Fresno County Snapshot 8 Demographic Characteristics 8 Socioeconomic Indicators 10 Health Indicators 13 Survey Results 21 Demographic Characteristics of Survey Participants 21 Ranking the Social Determinants of Health 23 Place-Based Focus Group Themes 25 Vulnerable Population Focus Group Themes 34 Key Informant Themes 40 Stakeholder Focus Group Themes 43 Community Engagement and Feedback 47 Fresno County Priority Areas of Agreement 48 Conclusion 52 References 53 Appendices In Supplementary Document Fresno County Community Health Needs Assessment 2020 | Page III Figures Figure 1. Percentage of Population by Race/Ethnicity and Income in the Past 12 Months, Fresno County, 2017, ACS VII Figure 2. Percentage of Population in Most and Least Polluted Census Tracts by Race/Ethnicity, Fresno County, 2018, CES VIII Figure 3. Percentage of Focus Group Participants by Race/Ethnicity, Fresno County, 2019 VIII Figure 4. Flow Chart of Community Engagement and Health Needs Assessment Process 3 Figure 5. Flow Diagram of Community Engagement and Health Needs Assessment Process 6 Figure 6. Fresno County Population by Census Tract, 2014-2018, ACS 8 Figure 7. Percentage of Age Group by Region, 2018, ACS 9 Figure 8. Percentage of Population by Race/Ethnicity and Region, 2018, ACS 10 Figure 9. Percentage of Population by Race/Ethnicity and Income in the Past 12 Months, Fresno County, 2017, ACS 12 Figure 10. Percentage of Population in Most and Least Polluted Census Tracts by Race/Ethnicity, Fresno County, 2018, CES 12 Figure 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of Pesticides in Surface Water and Sediments from Three Central California Coastal Watersheds, 2008–09
    In cooperation with the California State Water Resources Control Board Occurrence of Pesticides in Surface Water and Sediments from Three Central California Coastal Watersheds, 2008–09 Data Series 600 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photo of the Santa Maria River estuary near Guadalupe, California. Back: Photo of a drainage ditch adjacent to strawberry fields near Watsonville, California. Occurrence of Pesticides in Surface Water and Sediments from Three Central California Coastal Watersheds, 2008–09 By Kelly L. Smalling and James L. Orlando Prepared in cooperation with the California State Water Resources Control Board Data Series 600 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Smalling, K.L., and Orlando, J.L., 2011, Occurrence of pesticides in surface water and sediments from three central California coastal watersheds, 2008–09: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Lakeview 7.5' Quadrangle, Riverside
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Eastern Municipal Water District and the CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 01-174 Version 1.0 117 7' 30" 117 00' CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS 3 52' 30" 33 52' 30" MODERN SURFICIAL DEPOSITS—Sediment recently transported and Kmeg Granite of Mount Eden (Cretaceous)—Granite to monzogranite; white to gray, grain-size, rare schlieren, and more abundant, more attenuated inclusions. Age Qw Qf Qv Qc Qlv deposited in channels and washes, on surfaces of alluvial fans and alluvial plains, leucocratic, medium- to coarse-grained, commonly foliated. Contains relation to Lakeview Mountains pluton is ambiguous. Small mass of tonalite and on hillslopes. Soil-profile development is non-existant. Includes: muscovite, garnet, and almost no mafic minerals. Restricted to northeastern resembling Lakeview Mountains tonalite occurs within the Reinhardt Canyon Qyf6 Qw Very young wash deposits (late Holocene)—Deposits of active alluvium; confined part of quadrangle where it occurs as dikes and irregular masses emplaced pluton near the contact, but is not clear whether it is inclusion or intrusion of to San Jacinto River channel. Consists mostly of unconsolidated sand in along foliation in metamorphic rocks; also as southernmost part of small pluton Lakeview Mountains rock. Similar appearing tonalite north of Lakeview Qyf5 ephemeral, engineered river channel. Prior to agricultural development, that extends into quadrangle to north Mountains is correlated with Reinhardt Canyon pluton Holocene position of river channel was north of current engineered channel. Sediment Mixed metamorphic rocks and granitic rocks (Cretaceous and Qyf4 Klt Tonalite of Laborde Canyon (Cretaceous)—Biotite-hornblende tonalite.
    [Show full text]
  • Promotoras: Lessons Learned Improving Healthcare Access Latinos
    Promotoras: Lessons Learned on Improving Healthcare Access to Latinos 21.7% of San Joaquin Valley residents are living below 100% of federal poverty level. 2 John A. Capitman, Tania L. Pacheco, Mariana Ramírez, Alicia Gonzalez The Central Valley Health Policy Institute (CVHPI) at California State University Fresno seeks policy and program strategies to reduce racial/ethnic and other social inequities in health among San Joaquin Valley residents. Access to health for this partic ular population is plagued with barriers, but shares many access barriers with the rest of Californians. California’s San Joaquin Valley is a poor region, where significant poverty is present in both urban and rural areas.1 The region has some of the mo st medically underserved areas in the state, and the problem is worse for residents of Mexican descent. In 2005, o ver a quarter (34%) of non -elderly San Joaquin Valley adults who reported being without insurance were born in Mexico .3 Through generous grants from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hispanic Health Services Research Grant Program and Kaiser Permanente (KP) Fresno-Community Benefits Program CVHPI has been exploring the “Promotora Model” to increase access to Central Valley im migrant elders, adults, and their children. The CMS project focused on legal resident adults and elders while the KP project targeted “A promotora is mixed immigration status families. someone that is working in the PROMOTORA MODEL community and comes Promotoras de salud , also refe rred to as lay health advisors o r Community Health from within the Workers (CHWs), have been used to target hard -to reach populations, traditionally community.” excluded racial/ethnic groups, and other medically underserved communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Geologic Map of the Murrieta 7.5
    Prepared in cooperation with the CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT 03-189 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY o DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS 117 o 15' 117 07' 30" CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS 33o 37' 30" 33 o 37' 30" YOUNG SURFICIAL DEPOSITS—Sedimentary units that are slightly Kpvg Monzogranite to granodiorite-Pale gray, massive, medium-grained consolidated to cemented and slightly to moderately dissected. Alluvial fan hypidiomorphic-granular biotite monzogranite, and less abundant deposits (Qyf series) typically have high coarse:fine clast ratios. Younger hornblende-biotite granodiorite forming older ring dike. Plagioclase is surficial units have upper surfaces that are capped by slight to moderately An20 to An35, subhedral, tabular crystals. Contains included small to developed pedogenic-soil profiles (A/C to A/AC/BcambricCox profiles). large stoped blocks of gabbro Holocene Qya Qyf Qyv Qyls Includes: Kpvt Tonalite-Foliated biotite-hornblende tonalite. In eastern part of complex Qyf Young alluvial fan deposits (Holocene and latest Pleistocene)- grades into tonalite Qoa QUATERNARY Unconsolidated deposits of alluvial fans and headward drainages of Pleistocene fans. Consists predominately of gravel, sand, and silt Generic Cretaceous granitic rocks of the Peninsular Ranges batholith Qpfs Qpff Qvoa Qya Young alluvial channel deposits (Holocene and latest Pleistocene)- Fluvial deposits along canyon floors. Consists of unconsolidated sand, Kgd Granodiorite, undifferentiated (Cretaceous)-Biotite and hornblende- QTsw QTcw CENOZOIC Pliocene silt, and clay-bearing alluvium biotite granodiorite, undifferentiated. Most is massive and medium- Qyv Young alluvial valley deposits (Holocene and late Pleistocene)-Fluvial grained. Restricted to small exposure along east edge of quadrangle Tvsr Tvt deposits along valley floors.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 10.7 Paleo Report (PDF)
    Appendices APPENDIX 10.7 Paleontological Resources Assessment San Bernardino Municipal Water Department March 2016 Clean Water Factory Project EIR Appendices This page intentionally left blank San Bernardino Municipal Water Department March 2016 Clean Water Factory Project EIR PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT CLEAN WATER FACTORY PROJECT City of San Bernardino San Bernardino County, California For Submittal to: City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department 300 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 and United States Bureau of Reclamation 27708 Jefferson Street, Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92509 Prepared for: RBF Consulting 3210 E. Guasti Road, Suite 100 Ontario, CA 91761 Submitted by: Harry M. Quinn, Paleontologist/Geologist Terri Jacquemain, Report Writer CRM TECH 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 Michael Hogan, Principal Investigator Bai “Tom” Tang, Principal Investigator January 13, 2015 CRM TECH Contract No. 2878P Approximately 5.24 acres and 120,120 linear feet San Bernardino North and San Bernardino South, Calif., 7.5’ (1:24,000) Quadrangles Within the Rancho Muscupiabe and Rancho San Bernardino land grants T1N R4W and T1S R4W, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian MANAGEMENT SUMMARY In December 2014 and January 2015, at the request of RBF Consulting, CRM TECH performed a paleontological resource assessment on the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the proposed Clean Water Factory Project in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County, California. As proposed by the San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD), the project entails the installation of a recycled water pipeline system to connect the Waterman Basins and the East Twin Creek Spreading Grounds, located at the base of the San Bernardino Mountains, to the San Bernardino Water Reclamation Plant, located just north of the confluence of East Twin Creek and the Santa Ana River.
    [Show full text]
  • Central California Coast Steelhead
    Central California Coast steelhead Overall vulnerability—Moderate (65% Moderate, 35% High) Biological Sensitivity Moderate (65% Moderate, 35% High) Climate exposure—High (100% High) Adaptive capacity—Moderate (2.0) Data quality—58% of scores ≥ 2 Life History Synopsis The Central California Coast steelhead DPS exhibits considerable life history variation, though all adult migrations occur during winter (Moyle et al. 2017). Populations are found in streams below natural and man-made barriers from the Russian River south to Aptos Creek. Adults from this DPS enter rivers from October to May, depending on the system (Shapovalov and Taft 1954, Busby et al. 1996, Osterback et al. 2018), and can spawn soon after reaching spawning grounds. However, most spawning occurs during late spring, and thus avoids the damaging effect on redds of winter floods common to Central California Coast watersheds. In Waddell Creek, the majority of spawners are comprised of 3+ and 4+ year-old fish (35 and 46%, respectively); only 17% of Waddell Creek spawners spawned more than a single time S3-113 (Shapovalov and Taft 1954). Shapovalov and Taft (1954) identified 32 different combinations of freshwater/saltwater year type, although most were among the following four combinations: 2/1 (30%), 2/2 (27%), 3/1 (11%), and 1/2 (8%). Central California Coast steelhead eggs hatch in 25-35 days, depending on temperature, and alevins emerge from the gravel as fry after 2-3 weeks. Fry move to the stream edges but switch to deeper water as they grow larger. The abundance of juveniles in tributaries to San Francisco Bay is positively correlated with elevation, stream gradient, dominant substrate size, and percent native species.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Doctors Hospital in Modesto California
    Directions To Doctors Hospital In Modesto California Moldered and hirundine Torrence strewn her overspins chemoreceptor confederates and expelling drolly. Sacrosanct Janus always deaved his gaminess if Beck is unsoundable or respiratory approvingly. Phillipe originated his millepore unknits nights or stragglingly after Barbabas exacts and steeplechases merrily, interrogable and Laodicean. Children's hospital colorado at memorial hospital central chinese hospital clinch valley medical center dameron hospital doctors hospital of manteca doctors. We play in to doctors hospital in modesto california is? Doctors Medical Center High Risk Infant growing Up Program is located at 1441 Florida Avenue. St Jude Medical Center Providence. Modesto Crime Map extromodacapelliit. Park imaging center for social distancing measures that kills germs, upholstered furniture and it does dr feedback on our goal is a low vision correction treatments for directions to doctors hospital in modesto california. 3031 Telegraph Avenue Suite 202 Berkeley CA 94705 Dr. Urgent CareAfter Hours Clinic located in Modesto Specialty Clinics Rehab. What is an energy of an appointment to assist in to doctors hospital team follows a look at risk to schedule your dental visits to find contact facility. 174 reviews of Doctors Medical Center Unfortunately I love to have at last. Set should arrive time Route options All traffic Satellite Terrain. Spine remains in Sonora & Modesto Adventist Health. Columbia hospital doctors list Atata57. What they might incur with symptoms like your symptoms and directions to doctors modesto in california state of help. Routes & Schedules Modesto Area Express CA. Vous avez réussi le test suspicious tissues and directions to doctors modesto in california at our data about doctors medical center is based on a patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Services in Central California's San Joaquin Valley
    Social Services in Central California’s San Joaquin Valley Today’s Challenges - Tomorrow’s Outcomes June 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Central California Area Social Services Consortium Member Counties: Fresno Kern Kings Madera Merced San Joaquin San Luis Obispo Santa Barbara Stanislaus Tulare California State University, College of Health and Human Services, Department of Social Work Education Central California Social Welfare Research, Training and Evaluation Center J. Fiorello, Valley Professional Services, Author Social Services in Central California’s San Joaquin Valley Today’s Challenges – Tomorrow’s Outcomes BACKGROUND In recent years there has been increasing public and governmental awareness of the demographic and social differences between California’s Central Valley counties – Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tulare – and the rest of the state. The San Joaquin Valley, with agriculture as its primary industry, is experiencing explosive population growth rates with consequent increasingly intense stressors on its human services and fiscal support systems. In comparison to the rest of California, the Valley is home to increasing numbers of immigrant and monolingual families, and relatively flat growth rates in non- agriculture industry. Allocation of available state and federal social service resources continues to fall behind the escalating levels of public demand, while local economies struggle to maintain fiscal viability. In recognition of the Valley’s unique challenges, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, through the California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley, has requested information and recommendations for improving social services-related outcomes for residents of the Central Valley. The Central California Area Social Services Consortium (CCASSC), comprised of eight Valley and two coastal counties, provided the staff and technical support needed to respond to the Governor’s request.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Location and Description
    Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 East 1st Street, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90012 2 1 3 788 4842 OFFICE AND FAX [email protected] www.rinconconsultants.com November 12, 2019 Project No: 19-08558 Kathy Hoffer Development Director HILLWOOD Enterprises, L.P. 2855 Michelle Drive, Suite 180 Irvine, California 92606 Via email: [email protected] Subject: Paleontological Resource Assessment for the Moreno Valley Trade Center Project, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Dear Ms. Hoffer, Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) conducted a paleontological resource assessment for the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center Project (project), an industrial development located in the city of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. This study was prepared under contract to HILLWOOD Enterprises, L.P. (HILLWOOD) for use by the City of Moreno Valley (City) in support of the draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) being prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The goals of this assessment are to identify the geologic units that may be impacted by development of the project, determine the paleontological sensitivity of geologic units underlying the project site, assess the potential for impacts to paleontological resources from development of the project, and recommend mitigation measures to reduce impacts to scientifically significant paleontological resources, pursuant to CEQA. This paleontological resource assessment consisted of a fossil locality record search at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) and Western Science Center (WSC), a review of existing geologic maps, and a review of primary literature regarding fossiliferous geologic units within the project site and vicinity. Following the literature review and records search, this report assessed the paleontological sensitivity of the geologic units underlying the project site, determined the potential for impacts to significant paleontological resources, and proposed mitigation measures to reduce impacts to less than significant.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Joaquin Desert of California: Ecologically Misunderstood and Overlooked
    Natural Areas Journal . to advance the preservation of natural diversity A publication of the Natural Areas Association - www.naturalarea.org © Natural Areas Association The San Joaquin Desert of California: Ecologically Misunderstood and Overlooked David J. Germano1,6 1Department of Biology California State University Bakersfield, California, 93311-1022 Galen B. Rathbun2 Lawrence R. Saslaw3 Brian L. Cypher4 Ellen A. Cypher4 Larry M. Vredenburgh5 2Department of Ornithology and Mammalogy California Academy of Sciences Golden Gate Park, San Francisco c/o P.O. Box 202 Cambria, California 93428 3U.S. Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield, California 93308 4Endangered Species Recovery Program California State University-Stanislaus P.O. Box 9622 Bakersfield, CA 93389 5U. S. Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield, California 93308 6 Corresponding author: [email protected]; 661-654-2471 Natural Areas Journal 31:138–147 R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E ABSTRACT: The vegetation community of the San Joaquin Valley of California has been formally classified as a perennial grassland based largely on assumptions of past climax state. However, histori- cal records suggest that the region might be more accurately classified as a desert. The distinction is important in determining the appropriate management strategies for this ecosystem, particularly for the • many rare and endemic taxa that reside there. Abiotic and biotic factors–including low precipitation, arid soils, and desert-adapted plants and vertebrate–are consistent with conditions typical of desert ar- eas. We examined the distributions of these factors to define the extent of the San Joaquin Desert. We conclude that the San Joaquin Desert historically encompassed 28,493 km2 including the western and The San Joaquin southern two thirds of the San Joaquin Valley, and the Carrizo Plain and Cuyama Valley to the south- west.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast Region Report
    CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT Central Coast Region Report Coordinating Agencies: CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT Introduction to California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment alifornia is a global leader in using, investing in, and advancing research to set proactive climate change policy, and its Climate Change Assessments provide the scientifc foundation for understanding climate- related vulnerability at the local scale and informing resilience actions. The Climate Change Assessments directly inform State policies, plans, programs, and guidance to promote effective and integrated action to Csafeguard California from climate change. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment (Fourth Assessment) advances actionable science that serves the growing needs of state and local-level decision-makers from a variety of sectors. Tis cutting-edge research initiative is comprised of a wide-ranging body of technical reports, including rigorous, comprehensive climate change scenarios at a scale suitable for illuminating regional vulnerabilities and localized adaptation strategies in California; datasets and tools that improve integration of observed and projected knowledge about climate change into decision- making; and recommendations and information to directly inform vulnerability assessments and adaptation strategies for California’s energy sector, water resources and management, oceans and coasts, forests, wildfres, agriculture, biodiversity and habitat, and public health. In addition, these technical reports have been distilled into summary reports and a brochure, allowing the public and decision-makers to easily access relevant fndings from the Fourth Assessment. • A concise summary of the Fourth Assessment’s most important fndings and conclusions. • An in-depth report on how California’s people, built KEY FINDINGS environment, and ecosystems will be impacted by climate change and how we can proactively adapt, based on the Fourth Assessment’s fndings.
    [Show full text]