Weed Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weed Management production WEED MANAGEMENT Kurt J. Hembree istachios, like other crops, are grown under annual and perennial weeds. Fields with a P a wide variety of soil types, management history of perennial weeds, like nutsedge, field methods, and irrigation systems. In order to bindweed, dallisgrass, johnsongrass, and maintain profitable production, growers should bermudagrass should be avoided, since they are make weed management an integral part of the difficult to eradicate once established. If one total program. A plan to control weeds should has to plant into fields already infested with be in place before planting trees and carried these or other troublesome weeds, one may be through the life of the orchard. Weed control is better served by dedicating efforts at especially critical during the first years of controlling these weeds before new trees are establishment, since heavy weed competition planted. Although this ties up land for a time, can reduce early tree vigor and productivity. it can help reduce weed control costs for many In addition to direct competition for water years after planting. Unfortunately, there are no and nutrients, certain weeds host several inexpensive or easy solutions available to important insects (like lygus, Green Plant Bug, control perennial weeds once established in and False Chinch Bug), diseases (like new tree plantings. So, starting off with Verticillium wilt), nematodes, and rodents. relatively clean fields can be a large advantage Where low-volume drip or micro-sprinkler for long-term effective weed management. irrigation is used, weeds such as yellow nutsedge, spotted spurge, sprangletop, and UNDERSTANDING THE WEEDS bermudagrass become prevalent, interfering PRESENT with water distribution and reducing irrigation Weed identification efficiency. Proper weed identification is essential for weed Since few herbicides are registered in management decisions to be effective. By pistachio orchards (particularly in bearing being familiar with the weeds present, you can fields), growers, PCAs, and field managers better understand how they grow and need to be familiar with all the tools available reproduce. Weeds have differing to select the most appropriate management characteristics, making them unique from each strategy and achieve effective control. These other. They have different life cycles (annual, tools include field selection, weed biennial, or perennial), have differing general identification, monitoring weeds, sanitation, plant structures (broadleaf, grass, or sedge), and mechanical and/or chemical control. grow flat or erect, reproduce by seed and/or other reproductive structures (rhizomes, tubers, GETTING OFF TO A CLEAN START stolons, etc.), and compete differently for Field selection valuable resources. Properly identifying weeds While many considerations go into deciding on is especially important when deciding on specific fields to plant pistachios, it is herbicide selection, rates to use, and important to realize that long-term weed application timing. There are numerous weed control strategies are directly influenced by site species commonly found infesting pistachio selection. In order to reduce the costs orchards. Some of the more important ones are associated with weed control, select fields that listed in Table 1. are known to be relatively free of troublesome 85 Table 1. Weeds commonly found in pistachio One such method of monitoring is as follows orchards and requires five simple steps: 1) Walk several locations of the field two or three times per Summer Winter Perennials Annuals Annuals year (winter, spring, and summer) and identify the weeds present, 2) Rate each of the weeds Barnyardgrass Annual Bermudagrass found on a 1-10 scale (1= very few present or bluegrass not a problem, 3= moderate infestation, and 5= Hairy fleabane Cheeseweed Dallisgrass Lambsquarters Chickweed Field bindweed very heavy infestation or dominates most other Large crabgrass Cudweed Johnsongrass weeds), 3) Make note of weeds escaping Marestail Filaree spp. Nutsedge, herbicide or mechanical treatment, new weeds, purple or a shift in the type of weeds, 4) Map or list Pigweed spp. Mustard spp. Nutsedge, particular areas that show new weeds, escapes, yellow Prickly lettuce Nettle or shifts in populations, and 5) Maintain these Sowthistle Shepherd’s purse records in a file or computer, where they can be Spotted spurge readily accessed and updated. An example of a Sprangletop weed monitoring record is shown in Table 2. Turkey mullein Table 2. Weed record for field monitoring Several publications are available that can help growers, PCAs, and managers to Date Field Crop accurately identify weeds. Some include: The Herbicide(s) Rate(s) Date(s) Growers Weed Identification Handbook, Weeds used used treated of The West, and Weeds of California. Various IPM manuals are also available at University of Weeds present Weed rating Notes California Cooperative Extension county 1. offices that include weed photos and 2. descriptions. Local farm advisors, specialists, 3. and consultants are excellent sources to help 4. identify weeds. If unsure of the weeds in your 5. field, collect samples and bring them to someone to be identified. Weed samples should It is desirable to become familiar with all be stored under cool conditions and transported the weeds in the field and to monitor each of in a sealed plastic bag to maintain sample them. If certain weeds are not controlled or not integrity. Computer programs are also available monitored, they can soon dominate a field. In on CD-ROM that have easy-to-follow some cases, these weeds may be resistant to instructions for the taxonomic identification of your current herbicide regime and require new weeds. Using a personal computer and a weed methods of control. To avoid this shift in program, many of the weeds found in weeds, it is necessary to monitor the field California can be identified in less than seven frequently and rotate with effective herbicides, or eight steps. Consult your local farm advisor mechanical, or other means. Accurate records for further information regarding the programs help to point out areas in the field where tough- available. to-control weeds (field bindweed, mullein, nutsedge, etc.) may pose a problem. By Maintaining accurate weed records routinely monitoring for weeds, you can alter Maintaining accurate, up-to-date weed records your herbicide program, based on changing is important to track the distribution of weeds weed patterns. A little time spent monitoring in the field. It also helps in choosing the most for weeds can help you select appropriate appropriate method(s) of control. The exact herbicides, rates, and other control options to method of collecting weed data is not set in reduce long-term costs. stone, and often varies from grower to grower. 86 Field sanitation weeds emerged next to the trees can be done Many of the troublesome annual weeds (like with spot applications of post-emergence hairy fleabane, groundsel, and marestail) are herbicides like glyphosate, paraquat, or disseminated by wind, often originating from sulfosate, or hand weeding during the season. outside the field. Typically they are growing Other disadvantages to disking include along field borders or nearby ditches and increased soil erosion on sloping land, soil canals. Controlling these weeds with compaction, dust, reduced water infiltration, herbicides, disking, mowing, and burning can and a general decline in productivity. help eliminate seed production. Many times More commonly, growers disk only the growers achieve excellent weed control within middles, leaving a four- to six-foot strip of soil the field, but fail to clean surrounding areas. undisturbed within the tree row. This facilitates Reducing this seed source by eliminating basin, flood, and low-volume irrigation. weeds before they set seed is a must to prevent Mechanical mulchers, equipped with tripping new invasions into the field. mechanisms (such as the Kimco®), can then be used to destroy weeds within the tree row as DEVELOPING A RELIABLE WEED long as trees are staked. Mulching at a shallow CONTROL PROGRAM depth (1 - 2 inches) will kill most seedling It would be ideal if one method of weed annual weeds. Weeds larger than three or four management could be used in all pistachio inches tall may already have well defined root orchards, but this is obviously not possible. systems and are not easily killed. Perennials There are many local conditions that influence will not be controlled and often require timely management decisions, including topography, post-emergence herbicide applications. To be soil structure and texture, permeability, type of effective on young annual weeds, several trips irrigation, availability of equipment and labor, through the field during the season are herbicide and cost, and accessibility to the required. Where low-volume irrigation is used, orchard during wet conditions. The specific tubing should be suspended high enough to method(s) of weed control will vary from site permit access by the equipment. As with to site, but usually include the combination of disking, mechanical damage to trees is a mechanical, cultural, and chemical control concern and should be avoided. options. Complete non-tillage is an option where weeds are maintained in the middles as a green Tillage vs. Non-tillage cover. This is an excellent way of reducing soil Tillage options are normally limited to the area erosion, especially on sloping soils. A flail between tree rows. In-row tillage can be mower can be used five to seven times per year practiced in new plantings when low-volume to help maintain the weeds in a low-growing irrigation tubing has not been laid out or has state. This also allows for better field access been suspended off the soil surface. In and reduced soil compaction. Mowing too established plantings, disking can be used to close to the soil surface will create dust and eliminate weeds growing between tree rows. should be avoided. A cover crop can also be The size of the weeds is usually not a concern, planted to compete with the weeds in the as long as the disk blades cut deep enough to middles.
Recommended publications
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Control Guide for Ohio, Indiana and Illinois
    Pub# WS16 / Bulletin 789 / IL15 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Tables Table 1. Weed Response to “Burndown” Herbicides .............................................................................................19 Table 2. Application Intervals for Early Preplant Herbicides ............................................................................... 20 Table 3. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Corn—Grasses ....................................30 WEED Table 4. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Corn—Broadleaf Weeds ....................31 Table 5. Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Corn—Grasses ...................................................32 Table 6. Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Corn—Broadleaf Weeds ..................................33 2015 CONTROL Table 7. Grazing and Forage (Silage, Hay, etc.) Intervals for Herbicide-Treated Corn ................................. 66 OHIO, INDIANA Table 8. Rainfast Intervals, Spray Additives, and Maximum Crop Size for Postemergence Corn Herbicides .........................................................................................................................................................68 AND ILLINOIS Table 9. Herbicides Labeled for Use on Field Corn, Seed Corn, Popcorn, and Sweet Corn ..................... 69 GUIDE Table 10. Herbicide and Soil Insecticide Use Precautions ......................................................................................71 Table 11. Weed Response to Herbicides in Popcorn and Sweet Corn—Grasses
    [Show full text]
  • List of Herbicide Groups
    List of herbicides Group Scientific name Trade name clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*, Hoegrass®), fenoxaprop (Cheetah® Gold* , Wildcat®), A Aryloxyphenoxypropionates fluazifop (Fusilade®, Fusion®*), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) butroxydim (Falcon®, Fusion®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim A Cyclohexanediones (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) A Phenylpyrazoles pinoxaden (Axial®) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, B Sulfonylureas Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron, (Logran®, Logran® B Power®*), tribenuron (Express®), trifloxysulfuron (Envoke®, Krismat®*) florasulam (Paradigm®*, Vortex®*, X-Pand®*), flumetsulam B Triazolopyrimidines (Broadstrike®), metosulam (Eclipse®), pyroxsulam (Crusader®Rexade®*) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®,), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, B Imidazolinones Lightning®*, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) B Pyrimidinylthiobenzoates bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) C Amides: propanil (Stam®) C Benzothiadiazinones: bentazone (Basagran®,
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Differential Sensitivity of Sweet Corn to HPPD-Inhibiting Herbicides Martin M
    Weed Science 2010 58:289–294 Factors Affecting Differential Sensitivity of Sweet Corn to HPPD-Inhibiting Herbicides Martin M. Williams II and Jerald K. Pataky* Mutation of a cytochrome P450 (CYP) allele on the short arm of chromosome 5 affects sensitivity in sweet corn to mesotrione and to tembotrione plus isoxadifen applied POST. Hybrids that are homozygous for the functional allele (i.e., CYPCYP) are rarely injured at registered use rates, hybrids that are homozygous for mutant alleles (i.e., cypcyp) are frequently injured, and hybrids that are heterozygous for a functional and mutant allele (i.e., CYPcyp) have more variable responses over trials. The objectives of this work were (1) to conduct side-by-side comparisons of sweet corn hybrid responses to mesotrione, tembotrione plus isoxadifen, and topramezone under field conditions; and (2) to compare dose– response relationships among CYPCYP, CYPcyp, and cypcyp hybrids. Among 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibitors used POST in sweet corn, topramezone was safe on the 746 hybrids tested. When environmental conditions favored crop growth, mesotrione injured the largest number of hybrids, and these hybrids were almost exclusively cypcyp or CYPcyp. The safener isoxadifen added to the tembotrione product greatly reduced occurrence of injury to the CYPcyp genotypic class but not to the cypcyp hybrids. Despite a common genetic basis for herbicide metabolism, genotypic classes of sweet corn hybrids did not have identical field responses to mesotrione, tembotrione plus isoxadifen, and topramezone. Nomenclature: Isoxadifen, ethyl-5, 5-diphenyl-2-isoxazoline-3-3-carboxylate; mesotrione; tembotrione; topramezone; sweet corn, Zea mays L. Key words: Cross-sensitivity, cytochrome P450, dose–response, herbicide tolerance, nsf1 gene.
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota Herbicide Chart
    This chart lists premix herbicides alphabetically by their trade names so you can identify the premix's component herbicides and their respective site of action groups. Refer to the Mode of Action chart on the left for more information. North Dakota ------------------------------- Component -------------------------------------------------------- Premix Site of Action Trade Name ® Trade Name ® Active Ingredient Group Affinity BroadSpec Harmony :1 thifensulfuron 2 Express :1 tribenuron 2 Herbicide Chart Repeated use of herbicides with the same site of action alone can Affinity TankMix Harmony :4 thifensulfuron 2 Express :1 tribenuron 2 result in the development of herbicide-resistant weed populations. Anthem * Zidua* pyroxasulfone 15 Cadet fluthiacet-ethyl 14 By Mode of Action (effect on plant growth) Audit Harmony :3 thifensulfuron 2 This chart groups herbicides by their modes of action to assist you in selecting 1) to maintain Express :1 tribenuron 2 greater diversity in herbicide use and 2) to rotate among herbicides with different sites of action to delay the development of herbcide resistance. Authority Assist Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Pursuit imazethapyr 2 The Site of Action Group is a classification system developed by the Weed Science Society of America. Authority First Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Number of resistant - or Sonic FirstRate cloransulam 2 weed species in U.S. Site of Authority MTZ Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Action Product Examples Metribuzin metribuzin 5 Group Site of Action Chemical Family Active Ingredient Trade Name ®
    [Show full text]
  • A Corn and Soybean Herbicide Chart
    By Premix This chart lists premix herbicides alphabetically by their trade names Corn and Soybean so you can identify the premix’s component herbicides and their respective site of action groups. Refer to the Mode of Action chart on the left for more information. Herbicide Chart Component Premix Site of Action Trade Name ® Trade Name ® Active Ingredient Group Repeated use of herbicides with the same Anthem Zidua pyroxasulfone 15 Cadet fluthiacet-ethyl 14 site of action can result in the development of Autority Assist Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Pursuit imazethapyr 2 herbicide-resistant weed populations. Authority First Spartan sulfentrazone 14 FirstRate cloransulam 2 Autority MTZ Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Sencor metribuzin 5 By Mode of Action (effect on plant growth) Authority XL Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Classic chlorimuron 2 This chart groups herbicides by their modes of action to assist you in Autumn Super Autumn iodosulfuron 2 selecting herbicides 1) to maintain greater diversity in herbicide use and ------- thiencarbazone 2 Basis Blend Resolve rimsulfuron 2 2) to rotate among herbicides with different sites of action to delay the Harmony thifensulfuron 2 development of herbicide resistance. Bicep II Magnum Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 (Bicep Lite II Mag) AAtrex atrazine 5 The Site of Action Group is a classification system developed by the Weed Science Society of America. Boundary Dual Magnum s-metolachlor 15 Sencor metribuzin 5 Breakfree ATZ Breakfree acetochlor 15 (Breakfree ATZ Lite) AAtrex atrazine 5 Number of resistant Bullet
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus Palmeri S. Wats.) in the United States — Mechanisms of Resistance, Impact, and Management
    Chapter 1 Herbicide-Resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) in the United States — Mechanisms of Resistance, Impact, and Management Parminder S. Chahal, Jatinder S. Aulakh, M. Jugulam and Amit J. Jhala Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61512 Abstract Palmer amaranth, a dioecious summer annual species, is one of the most trouble‐ some weeds in the agronomic crop production systems in the United States. In the last two decades, continuous reliance on herbicide(s) with the same mode of action as the sole weed management strategy has resulted in the evolution of herbicide- resistant (HR) weeds, including Palmer amaranth. By 2015, Palmer amaranth bio‐ types had been confirmed resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibitors, dinitroanilines, glyphosate, hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibi‐ tors, and triazine herbicides in some parts of the United States along with multiple HR biotypes. Mechanisms of herbicide-resistance in Palmer amaranth are discussed in this chapter. Preplant herbicide options including glufosinate, 2,4-D, and dicam‐ ba provide excellent Palmer amaranth control; however, their application is limited before planting crops, which is often not possible due to unfavorable weather con‐ ditions. Agricultural biotechnology companies are developing new multiple HR crops that will allow the post-emergence application of respective herbicides for management of HR weeds, including Palmer amaranth. For the effective in-crop management of Palmer amaranth, and to reduce the potential for the evolution of other HR weeds, growers should apply herbicides with different modes of action in tank-mixture and should also incorporate cultural practices including inversion till‐ age and cover crops along with herbicide programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Postemergence Herbicides for Control of Tropical Turfgrass Weeds on Golf Courses
    Postemergence Herbicides for Control of Tropical Turfgrass Weeds on Golf Courses James Brosnan, Ph.D. University of Tennessee A list of commercially available herbicides used for postemergence (POST) weed control is presented in the table below. Weed species are listed in alphabetical order. Many POST herbicides require precise application to minimize the potential of injury to desirable turf. In general, control of perennial and large annual weeds often requires repeat herbicide applications. For optimum control of perennial and large annual weeds, make applications before target weeds become mature. Always refer to the product label for specific information on proper herbicide use, tank- mix compatibility and turfgrass tolerance. Tank-mixing more than one chemical may improve efficacy, as will delivering sequential applications of a single chemical. These strategies may also result in undesirable turfgrass injury. For more information on turfgrass weed control, visit the University of Tennessee’s turfgrass weed science Web site, http://tennesseeturfgrassweeds.org Common Name Active Ingredient Annual bluegrass amicarbazone (Poa annua) atrazine bispyribac-sodium clethodim ethofumesate flazasulfuron foramsulfuron glufosinate glyphosate imazaquin metribuzin metsulfuron rimsulfuron simazine sulfosulfuron trifloxysulfuron Bermudagrass clethodim (Cynodon spp.) ethofumesate fenoxaprop fluazifop glufosinate glyphosate sethoxydim triclopyr Crabgrass clethodim (Digitaria spp.) fenoxaprop flazasulfuron fluazifop quinclorac glufosinate glyphosate
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA
    Revised Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid August 10, 2006 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM Date: August 10, 2006 Subject: Revised “Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid” Document From: Lance Wormell, Chemical Review Manager Reregistration Branch 2 Special Review and Reregistration Division To: Organic Arsenical Herbicides Docket (EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0201) EPA originally published the “Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid” (EPA 738-R-06-021) in the electronic docket on August 9, 2006. EPA has since identified and corrected a typographical error on page 22. The cancer slope factor for inorganic arsenic used to calculate the exposure level in drinking water was incorrectly listed as 3.67 x 10-3 (mg/kg/day)-1. The value has since been corrected to 3.67 (mg/kg/day)-1. The typographical change in the document does not alter EPA’s calculations or conclusions and the current document should be used in place of the previous version. United States Office of Prevention, Pesticides EPA 738-R-06-021 Environmental Protection And Toxic Substances July 2006 Agency (7508P) _________________________________________________________________ Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid List B Case Nos. 2395, 2080 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,946,123 B2 Debutts (45) Date of Patent: Feb
    USOO8946 123B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,946,123 B2 Debutts (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 3, 2015 (54) COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR USPC .................................................. 504/135,144 CONTROLLING THE DIRECTION OF See application file for complete search history. GROWTH OF PLANTS WITH ROOTLETS (56) References Cited (76) Inventor: Richard Foster Debutts, Smyrna, GA (US) U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 3,920,436 A 11/1975 Janssen (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 4,088.473 A 5, 1978 Linton patent is extended or adjusted under 35 4,882,874 A 11/1989 Paulson et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 617 days. 5,744.423 A * 4/1998 Voris et al. .................... 504,361 5,750,130 A 5/1998 Ferrell et al. 6,001,346 A 12/1999 Delwiche et al. (21) Appl. No.: 12/472,576 6,528, 114 B1 3/2003 Summons 6,676,954 B2 1/2004 Dai et al. (22) Filed: May 27, 2009 7,094,734 B2 8/2006 Ushiguchi et al. 7,264,796 B2 9/2007 Hejna et al. (65) Prior Publication Data 2002/0034550 A1* 3/2002 Quong .......................... 424/489 2003/0215657 A1 1 1/2003 Tijsma et al. US 2009/O298692 A1 Dec. 3, 2009 2006,0040827 A1 2/2006 Rajamannan 2007/01 10783 A1 5/2007 Pildysh 2007/0238615 A1 10, 2007 Krause et al. Related U.S. Application Data OTHER PUBLICATIONS (60) Provisional application No. 61/056,453, filed on May Nakajima-Kambe et al., Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 28, 2008. vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Pull Here to Open
    GROUP 1 HERBICIDE PULL HERE TO OPEN Herbicide Postemergence Herbicide for Control of Perennial and Annual Grass Weeds Active Ingredients: Fluazifop-P-butyl Butyl(R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoate 24.15% Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl (+)-ethyl-2-[4-[6-(chloro-2-benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoate 6.76% Other Ingredients*: 69.09% Total: 100.00% Contains 2 lbs. (+) isomer (fluazifop-P-butyl) and 0.56 lbs. fenoxaprop-P-ethyl active ingredient per gallon. *Contains aromatic petroleum distillates. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN. WARNING/AVISO Si usted no entiende la etiqueta, busque a alguien para que se la explique a usted en detalle. (If you do not understand the label, find someone to explain it to you in detail.) See directions for use inside booklet. EPA Reg. No. 100-1059 EPA Est. No. 11773-IA-01 Product of United Kingdom Formulated in the USA SCP 1059A-L1D 1210 2.5 gallons 334497 Net Contents FIRST AID If on skin or • Take off contaminated clothing. clothing • Rinse skin immediately with plenty of water for 15-20 minutes. • Call a poison control center or doctor for treatment advice. If swallowed • Immediately call a poison control center or doctor. • Do not induce vomiting unless told to do so by a poison control center or doctor. • Do not give any liquid to the person. • Do not give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. If in eyes • Hold eye open and rinse slowly and gently with water for 15-20 minutes. • Remove contact lenses, if present, after the fi rst 5 minutes, then continue rinsing eye.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic and Pest Management Evaluation of the Herbicide Dacthal in California Agriculture
    An Economic and Pest Management Evaluation of the Herbicide Dacthal in California Agriculture Prepared for California Department of Food and Agriculture Office of Pesticide Consultation and Analysis Rachael Goodhue1 Steven Fennimore2 Daniel Tregeagle3 Tor Tolhurst4 Hanlin Wei4 1Professor and Chair, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2Extension Specialist and Weed Ecophysiologist, Department of Plant Sciences 3Post-Doc, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics 4PhD Student, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of California, Davis 1 Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................7 Introduction................................................................................................................................8 Background...........................................................................................................................10 Dacthal use and Groundwater Protection Areas....................................................................11 Regulatory process................................................................................................................12 Dacthal Use...............................................................................................................................15 Statewide..............................................................................................................................15 Monterey County..................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]