DOCSLIB.ORG

Delaware View House, Delaware Water Gap National Recreational

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delaware View House, Delaware Water Gap National Recreational cifre* oi&oi U S n o ti c z L9-0/IÒUS7O HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT DELAWARE VIEW HOUSE Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Prepared for: THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Bushkill, Pennsylvania Prepared by: FORD FAREWELL MILLS AND GATSCH, ARCHITECTS Princeton, New Jersey March, 1994 THE DE REMER HOUSE TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface List of Figures iv PART I HISTORICAL DATA Hunter Research, Inc. A. History of the Old Mine Road/U. S. Route 206/Montague Township 1-1 B. Construction Date and History of Ownership 1-4 of the De Remer House C. Significance of the Owners in the Community 1-5 PART II ARCHITECTURAL DATA A. General Description Site and Exterior n-i B. Exterior Description and Condition II-2 C. Interior Description and Condition 1. a. Basement Description and Condition H-6 b. Basement Plan H-6a 2. a. First Floor Description and Condition n-7 b. First Floor Plan H-21a 3. a. Second Floor Description and Condition n-22 b. Second Floor Plan n-36a 4. a. Attic Description and Condition n -37 b. Roof Plan H-54a PART in STRUCTURAL DATA DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION Harrison-Hamnett, Consulting Engineer Page A. Basement III-1 B. First Floor IU-2 C. Second Floor III-3 D. Attic HI-4 PART IV RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS A. Preservation Philosophy IV-1 B. Preservation Recommendations and Cost Estimate 1. Sitework IV-2 2. Exterior IV-3 3. Interior IV-5 C. Additional Room-by-Room Recommendations IV-9 D. Recommendations for Use IV-15 E. Recommended Areas for Further Study IV-15 FIGURES V-l APPENDICES Appendix A - Chain of Title Appendix B - HABS Drawings* Appendix C - 1. Map of Sussex County, 1860 2. Topographical Map of the Delaware River Basin/ Tocks Island Reservoir *To be provided by the National Park Service 3. Real Estate Map of the Tocks Island Reservoir and the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, 1968 BIBLIOGRAPHY PREFACE This Historic Structure Report is designed to assist the National Park Service and future lessees of the Delaware View House with making informed decisions regarding the building’s future. Site visits were made in October 1993. At that time the house had been mothballed by the National Park Service for a number of years. Although some information was acquired regarding periods of ownership, no concrete evidence was found which could absolutely date any of the sections of the building. As often is the case in research such as this, there will be no clear or absolute answer to the questions of Who built it?, What did it look like?, and When was it built? Where possible, due to the evidence of construction habits or details typical to a particular period, likely dates of construction have been attributed. Most recommendations suggest restoring elements to their original configuration and finish. However, to some degree, the avenue of interpretation chosen and subsequent improvements to the building will hinge on the use the National Park Service assigns to the building. It is of urgent importance that the Delaware View House be stabilized immediately. If it is allowed to languish in its current state it is likely to be considered beyond repair and will eventually collapse. At present the building should be considered dangerous. Access should be extremely limited and should be restricted only to those individuals who need admission in order to provide services for the building. Individuals are to be informed of building's condition before entering. The ideal solution is to go beyond stabilization to actual repair/restoration and to have the building occupied. As long as the building is unoccupied it will continue to be a liability and a hazard. The first section of the report provides a general background of the Walpack Township area followed by specific information on the Delaware View House and the significance of the families who occupied it. The second section addresses the description and condition of the building elements. The interior of the house is described in a room by room basis. Floor plans are found at the end of the description of each floor. The third section provides a description and condition of the house from a structural standpoint. The fourth section provides recommendations and estimation of probable costs. Figures are found following the text. Supporting information such as chain of title and maps is located in the Appendix. ORGANIZATION OF THE WORK Four methodologies were used in the course of this work: Graphic Documentation Field photographs were taken and simple measured drawings of the building plans were prepared to gain a more complete architectural understanding of the building. l 2. Historical (Documentary) Research The necessary historical background information was gathered, with the emphasis placed on assembling data directly relevant to the existing structure and its development. Most of this information was taken from primary sources. 3. On-Site Physical Investigation An on-site examination of the building fabric was conducted to obtain an understanding of the building's development and its physical condition, including structure, finishes and building systems. 4. Report Compilation The findings from the physical investigation and the documentary research were recorded in written form and synthesized in the report. CREDITS The preparation of a historic structure report depends on the cooperation and assistance of many individuals and agencies. We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation and assistance of Robert Williams and Leonard Peck of the Walpack Historical Society and the staff of the Sussex County Courthouse, Sussex County Historical Society, and Sussex County Library. In addition we would like to thank Mr. Thomas Solon and his staff at the National Park Service for their assistance in making the building accessible. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this historic structure report is: 1. To document and clearly illustrate the historical and physical evidence found in researching the building, in order to establish original and subsequent appearance with respect to plan, elevation, and finishes. 2. To document the present state of the building's architectural materials, overall structural stability and support systems. 3. To complete a detailed architectural description of the building as found, to become a part of the building's permanent archival record. li 4. To identify areas of the building’s physical fabric where change can or should occur, and conversely, where change should not occur, and to establish priorities for restoration. Finally, the following personnel of the firm Ford Farewell Mills and Gatsch, Architects and its consultants carried out the work of this report. Partner-in-Charge Michael J. Mills, AIA Project Manager Matthew S. Chalifoux, AIA Project Architects Karen Sargent Jennifer A. Stark, AIA Historical Consultant Hunter Research Inc. Michael Tompkins, Historian Structural Engineer Harrison-Hamnett, P.C. John Harrison, P.E. Word Processing Betty Bowers in DELAWARE VIEW HOUSE LIST OF FIGURES List of Figures Figure # 1 West Elevation 2 North Elevation 3 East Elevation 4 South Elevation 5 Building Chronology 6 Historic View Taken from the South 7 Early Section A Roof Enclosed in Attic 8 Porch Eave on South Elevation 9 Profile of Door Trim, Section A, South Elevation 10 Northwest Comer of Porch 11 View from under South Eave of Porch 12 Room #101, Entry Hall 13 Front Door Stored in Room #102 14 Profile of Type B Door and Window Architrave Molding 15 Room #102, South Wall. 16 Room #102, Ceiling; View to East 17 Room #102; North Wall 18 Room #102; West Wall 19 Profile of Type B Wood Baseboard 20 Profile of Type A Wood Baseboard 21 Room #103, Deteriorated Baseboard and Wall; East Wall 22 Room #104; Door to #101. Baseboard Type A and Type B 23 Room #104; Door to Room #101 24 Room #104; North Wall 25 Room #104; Type AWindow 26 Room #104; Type B Baseboard 27 Room #105; South Wall 28 Room #105; Beaded Board Ceiling 29 Room #105; East Wall 30 Room #106; Door to Room #107 31 Room #106; Door to Room #107 32 Room #106; Window 33 Profile of Type C Wood Baseboard 34 Room #106; Type C Baseboard 35 Profile of Type A Door and Window Architrave Molding 36 Room #107; South Wall 37 Room #107 38 Room #107; Door Opening to Basement Stair 39 Room #107; Cupboard in Northwest Comer 40 Room #107; Fireplace on East Wall 41 Room #107; Winder Stair 42 Room #201; Baseboard - Type A and Type B tv 43 Room #202 44 Room 203; Painted Beaverboard Ceiling 45 Room 209; Missing Floor Boards 46 Room 212; Built-in Comer Table 47 Room #217; Stone Chimney 48 Room 001; Concrete Masonry Piers 49 Porch Floor Joist Supported by Wood Ledger 50 Porch Floor Joists Bearing on Porch Wall 51 Porch, West Wall 52 Porch Rubble Foundation Wall 53 Porch Rubble Foundation Wall 54 #002; Wood Girders Supported by Stone Piers 55 #002; Wood Girders Supported by CMU Piers 56 #002; Wood Post Supporting Floor Joists 57 #002; Damaged South Wall of Building 58 Displaced Foundation Stones 59 Wood Sill Plate at East Wall 60 Rotted Beam Outside East Wall 61 Room #104; Second Floor Joists 62 Room #104; Second Floor Joists 63 Loose Tile Flooring on Second Floor 64 Attic, Wood Purlins Supported by Wood Posts v HISTORICAL DATA PART I PARTI Historical Data A. History of Old Mine Road/Walpack Township The current township of Walpack is located in the southwestern comer of Sussex County. Walpack was recognized as a municipal entity within Hunterdon County as early as 1731. In 1739 it was set off to Morris County, when that county was created, and then in 1753 it was included within the newly formed county of Sussex.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hurricane Standards
    2012 Edition Hurricane Standards MAINMAINBRONZEMAINBRONZEBRONZESILVERSILVERSILGOLDVER GOLDGOLDPLATINUMPLATINUMPLATINUMB&W B&W B&W FORTIFIED is a program of the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety HURRICANEHURRICANEHURRICANE WILDFIREWILDFIREWILDFIRE HAIL HAIL HAIL EARTHQUEARTHQUAKEEARTHQUAKE AKE FORTIFIED STANDARDS - HURRICANE 3 Table of Contents Hurricane Resistance Bronze Designation Attachment to Wall 5 Objective 45 Prescriptive Retrofit Measure for Anchorage 5 Designation Term Limit of the Roof through the Walls to the Foundation 5 Definitions 53 Securing Chimneys 53 Prescriptive retrofit measures Hurricane Resistance Bronze1 Designation 53 Engineering-based retrofit measure without Roof Cover Replacement 54 Figure G-08: Typical Tie-Down for Chimney Framing 6 Introduction 55 Ensure Windows and Doors Meet Site Appropriate 6 Strengthening of roof sheathing attachment and Design Pressures providing a sealed roof deck for the roof 55 Design pressure rating and impact designation from within the attic requirements 7 Improving the attachment of drip edges 7 Improving the attachment/replacing ridge vents Appendix A and off-ridge vents 56 Introduction 56 Types of Failures Hurricane Resistance Bronze2 Designation 57 Prescriptive Method with Roof Cover Replacement 8 Roof deck attachment (re-nail the roof decking) Appendix B 10 Deteriorated or damaged roof deck 82 Exposure Categories 10 Requirements for replacement of roof decking 10 Deteriorated or damaged wood roof framing Appendix C member 83 Design Wind Pressures for Components:
    [Show full text]
  • FRSA Article & Technical Advisory on Sealed Attics
    A Publication of the FRSA ◆ Florida’s Association of Roofing Professionals Research Remains to Be Conducted on Effects of Sealed Attics on Roofing Systems in By John Hellein, RFM Editor – Redistributed with Permision Florida’s Climate According to comments at FRSA’s April committee meetings, materials, the risk of moisture problems due the use of sealed attics as a residential insulation solution has to reduced drying potential of the system become widespread in Florida. Some member contractors will increase substantially. This could lead to expressed concern about possible negative effects caused potential long-term accumulation of moisture in the when attics are sealed and ventilation that allows for the en- roof system resulting in costly and potentially haz- try and egress of air in the attic is eliminated. At the same ardous structural deterioration as well as possible time, members recognized that sufficient scientific research, health risks. specific to Florida’s high temperature, high humidity climate ARMA’s Technical Bulletin (Form No. 211-RR-94) referenc- has yet to be conducted. es “Shingle Application Directly Over Insulated Decks” and A primary concern about sealed attics is the possibility states: that the lack of air movement into and out of the attic might result in moisture that permeates from the living space be- This type of application is not recommended unless low being trapped. The trapped moisture could encourage an adequate free-flow ventilation space is created the growth of mold in the insulation or trusses. Also, it is between the top of any insulation and the under- possible that the higher humidity could weaken the wood in side of a nailable deck.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-SEASON 16X30 VERMONT COTTAGE C SOLUTIONS Pre-Cut Kit
    LIVING SOLUTIONS LIVING SOLUTIONS LIVING 4-SEASON 16X30 VERMONT COTTAGE C SOLUTIONS Pre-Cut Kit This inviting one room shanty offers an open floor plan and loft that extends over the porch. Pool house, home office, hunting cabin; the options abound with this design. Consider upgrading to four-season for a sanctuary you can escape to all year round. 16X30 VERMONT COTTAGE C The 4-season kit includes the complete kit plus insulation throughout, roof sheathing, 4-SEASON PRE-CUT KIT interior shiplap pine wall and ceiling sheathing, Base Area: 480 sq. ft. double pane windows and an insulated door. Note: Loft Area: 128 sq. ft. Pictures may reflect client upgrades and modifications Total Interior Area: 544 sq. ft. that do not come standard. Porch Area: 64 sq. ft. Roof Recommended Foundation: Gable Roof Style Compacted 12” Crushed Gravel Roof Pitch: 8/12 Overall Dimensions: 14’6”H x 18’6W x 32’6”D 2”x6” Kiln Dried Spruce Rafters 24” On Center Estimated Weight: 22300 lbs 2”x6” Kiln Dried Spruce Exposed Collar Ties Floor System 1” rough sawn Solid Barn 3 (qty) 6x6x30’ Hemlock Skids Board Roof Sheathing 2”x6” Kiln Dried Spruce Joists 16” On Center Roof Vapor Barrier ¾” CDX Plywood Floor Decking 5½” Fiberglass Insulation (R21) 4-SEASON KITS: 1” rough sawn Hemlock Porch Decking Shiplap Pine Interior Ceiling Sheathing The package includes the complete kit Floor Vapor Barrier Corrugated 29g Metal Roofing, plus vapor barrier, insulation, solid pine roof 5½” Fiberglass Insulation (R21) Color: Evergreen sheathing, ship lap pine interior wall and Under Deck Sheathing: ⅜” Plywood 12” Overhangs on all sides ceiling sheathing, double-pane, energy effi- Floor Weight Rating: 25 lbs/sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Mitigation Retrofits for Existing Site-Built Single-Family
    HURRICANE MITIGATION RETROFITS FOR EXISTING SITE-BUILT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES 101 Retrofits Required. Pursuant to Section 553.844 553.884, Florida Statutes, strengthening of existing site-built, single family residential structures to resist hurricanes shall be provided. 101.1 When a roof on an existing site-built, single family residential structure is replaced: (a) Roof-decking attachment and fasteners shall be strengthened and corrected as required by section 201.1. (b) A secondary water barrier shall be provided as required by section 201.2. 101.2 When a roof is replaced on a building that is located in the wind-borne debris region as defined in s. 1609.2 of the Florida Building Code, Building and that has an insured value of $300,000 or more or, if the building is uninsured or for which documentation of insured value is not presented, has a just valuation for the structure for purposes of ad valorem taxation of $300,000 or more: (a) Roof to wall connections shall be improved as required by section 201.3. (b) Mandated retrofits of the roof-to-wall connection shall not be required beyond a 15 percent increase in the cost of re-roofing. (c) Where complete retrofits of all the roof-to-wall connections as prescribed in Section 201.3 would exceed 15 percent of the cost of the re-roofing project, the priorities outlined in Section 201.3.5 shall be used to limit the scope of work to the 15 percent limit. 101.3 When any activity requiring a building permit that is applied for on or after July 1, 2008, and for which the estimated cost is $50,000 or more for a building that is located in the wind borne debris region as defined in s.
    [Show full text]
  • Roofing Handbook
    FM_Scharff_CMS 6x9 9/21/00 2:04 PM Page i ROOFING HANDBOOK Robert Scharff (Deceased) Terry Kennedy Second Edition McGraw-Hill New York San Francisco Washington, D.C. Auckland Bogotá Caracas Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan Montreal New Delhi San Juan Singapore Sydney Tokyo Toronto FM_Scharff_CMS 6x9 9/21/00 2:04 PM Page ii Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scharff, Robert. Roofing handbook / Robert Scharff, Terry Kennedy.—2nd ed. p. cm. ISBN 0-07-136058-1 1. Roofing. I. Kennedy, Terry. II. Title. TH2431.S28 2000 695—dc21 00-062522 McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2001, 1996 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data base or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. 1234567890 DOC/DOC 06543210 P/N 137056-0 PART OF ISBN 0-07-136058-1 The sponsoring editor for this book was Zoe G. Foundotos, the editing supervisor was Stephen M. Smith, and the production supervisor was Sherri Souffrance. It was set in Melior following the modified CMS 6x9 design by Joanne Morbit and Michele Pridmore of McGraw- Hill’s Hightstown, N.J., Professional Book Group composition unit. Printed and bound by R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company. This book is printed on recycled, acid-free paper containing a minimum of 50% recycled, de-inked fiber. McGraw-Hill books are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Roof Nailing Over Skip Sheathing
    TECHNICAL NOTE APA Structural-Use Panels Over Spaced-Board Roofs Number P300C January 2006 When replacing roofing, it is often necessary to cover spaced boards with a solid roof deck. APA Rated Sheathing panels, which include plywood and oriented strand board, may be used for this purpose. When the panels are attached over the spaced boards to the rafters or trusses, the resulting roof structure will have greater resistance to wind and seismic forces than the original spaced-board roof. The spaced boards do not have to be removed or replaced, except to repair decayed, broken or warped pieces. The recommendations in this Technical Note are consistent with ASCE 7-02 and the 2003 IBC for wind uplift capacity for design wind speeds up to 100 mph (3-second gust) and a gable-end or hip roof with a 30-foot mean height with a slope between 2/12 and 12/12 at an inland location (Exposure B). Hurricane-prone regions of the Atlantic and Gulf coasts will typically require additional fastening to resist higher wind-load forces. The existing roof sheathing boards are assumed to be 1-inch nominal boards at a maximum spacing of 12 inches o.c. Structural requirements for the panels are usually minimal because of installation over the spaced boards. Panels 5/16 inch or thicker may be used. Panels should be allowed to acclimatize for a few days before installing on the roof. Acclimatize panels by standing them on edge, out of the weather, with space between each for air circulation. APA recommends that all panel end and edge joints be spaced 1/8 inch at time of installation, unless otherwise recom- mended by the panel manufacturer.a Cover sheathing as soon as possible with roofing felt for extra protection against mois- ture prior to roofing application.
    [Show full text]
  • High Wind Standards
    HIGH WIND STANDARDS 2015 Table of Contents Program Overview and Definitions ..................................................................................................................... 4 Goals ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 FORTIFIED Home Eligible Dwellings ............................................................................................................................ 4 Definitions and Conditions ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Foundation Qualification Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 5 Available Designations ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Designation Term Limit ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................................... 8 FORTIFIED
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Structure Report: Hale Cabin, Elkmont Historic District, Great Smoky Mountains National Park List of Figures
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Elkmont Historic District Great Smoky Mountains National Park Hale Cabin Elkmont Historic District Great Smoky Mountains National Park Historic Structure Report Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Division Southeast Region Hale Cabin Elkmont Historic District Great Smoky Mountains National Park Historic Structure Report March 2016 Prepared by The Jaeger Company Under the direction of National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Division TheThe culturalreport presented landscape here report exists presentedin two formats. here A exists printed in two formats. A printed version is available for study at the park, version is available for study at the park, the Southeastern the Southeastern Regional Office of the National Park Service,Regional and Office at a ofvariety the National of other Park repositories. Service, and For at morea variety widespread access, this cultural landscape report also exists of other repositories. For more widespread access, this report in a web-based format through ParkNet, the website of the Nationalalso exists Park in a Service.web-based Please format visit through www.nps.gov Integrated for Resource more information. Management Applications (IRMA). Please visit www.irma. nps.gov for more information. Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Division Cultural Resources Southeast Regional Office Southeast Region National Park Service National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW 100 Alabama St. SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Atlanta, GA 30303 (404)507-5847 (404) 562-3117 Great Smoky Mountains National Park 107 Park Headquarters Road Gatlinburg, TN 37738 2006 www.nps.gov/grsmCultural Landscape Report AboutDoughton the cover: Park View ofand the Sections Hale Cabin, 2A, 2015 B, and C Blue Ridge Parkway Asheville, NC Hale Cabin Elkmont Historic District Great Smoky Mountains National Park Historic Structure Report Approved By : ~~~~~______.___..__,~d~~!------ ..
    [Show full text]
  • Port Oneida Rural Historic District Historic Name Pyramid Point, Port Oneida Other Names/Site Number
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior MAY I 4 1997 National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16 A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Port Oneida Rural Historic District historic name Pyramid Point, Port Oneida other names/site number 2. LOCATION street & number Rural Route Port Oneida _not for publication city or town Maple City_______________ _vicinity X_____ state Michigan code MI _county Leelanau code 089 zip code 49664 3. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _ nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Roof Replacement Specifications Riverside
    ROOF REPLACEMENT SPECIFICATIONS RIVERSIDE HIGH SCHOOL 794 HAMMET BRIDGE RD. GREER, SOUTH CAROLINA 29650 PROJECT NO. GSP1010.059 Prepared For GREENVILLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 301 CAMPERDOWN WAY GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29602 Prepared By RAYMOND ENGINEERING-GEORGIA, INC. GREER, SOUTH CAROLINA April 13, 2020 _______________________________ Brent A. Iverson, R.R.C., R.R.O. Greg Rivers, P.E. Raymond Engineering-Georgia, Inc. Riverside High School Project No. GSP1010.059 Roof Replacement SECTION 00 01 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS Division 00 – Procurement and Contracting Requirements Section 00 01 10 – Table of Contents The School District of Greenville County – Invitation for Bid Division 01 – General Requirements Section 01 11 00 – Summary of Work Section 01 22 13 – Unit Prices and Allowances Section 01 26 00 – Modification Procedures Section 01 29 73 – Schedule of Values Section 01 29 76 – Application for Payment Section 01 31 19 – Project Meetings Section 01 32 13 – Construction Schedules Section 01 33 00 – Submittals Section 01 33 23 – Shop Drawing, Product Data, and Samples Section 01 42 19 – Reference Standards Section 01 45 00 – Quality Control Section 01 50 00 – Temporary Facilities and Controls Section 01 60 00 – Product Requirements Section 01 66 00 – Storage and Protection Section 01 73 30 – Asbestos Products Section 01 74 00 – Cleaning Section 01 77 00 – Project Closeout Procedures Section 01 78 36 – Guaranties Section 01 78 39 – Project Record Documents Division 02 – Existing Conditions Section 02 41 13 – Selective Demolition and Preparations
    [Show full text]
  • Project Number 4002-12 PROJECT MANUAL for ALDINE SENIOR
    Project Number 4002-12 PROJECT MANUAL for ALDINE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL MECHANICAL AND ROOF REPLACEMENT PACKAGE # PCK RP 18-11 Houston, Texas for ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Houston, Texas ISSUE FOR BID – 10/30/2017 IDG ARCHITECTS, LLC 440 Benmar Drive, Suite No. 3335 Houston, Texas 77060 832-448-2462 ROOFING Arrow Consulting Corp. 104 Industrial Blvd., Suite 1 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 281-565-1155 281-565-2440 Fax MEP #1 Lee, Truong & Yu, PLLC 16225 Park Ten Pl #810 Houston, Texas 77084 281/945/8888 www.lty-engineers.com MEP #2 Stanton Engineering Group 1300 W. Sam Houston Pkwy. S. Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77402 10/30/2017 713-300-9292 Aldine Senior High School Mechanical and Roof Replacement Project No. 4002-12 PCKRP 18-11 PROJECT DIRECTORY ALDINE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL MECHANICAL AND ROOF REPLACEMENT Aldine Independent School District IDG Project No. 4002-12 BOARD OF EDUCATION Dr. Viola M. Garcia, President Rose Ogden, Vice President Steve Mead, Secretary Paul Shankin, Assistant Secretary Steve Mead, Trustee Patricia Ann Bourgeois, Trustee Conception Esperza, Trustee Dr. Kimberly Booker, Trustee ADMINISTRATION Dr. Wanda Bamberg, Superintendent Dr. Archie L. Blanson, Deputy Superintendent Patrick Mouton, Executive Director of Facilities and Construction OWNER ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1617 Lauder Houston, Texas 77039 ARCHITECT IDG ARCHITECTS, LLC Telephone: 832-448-2462 440 Benmar Drive Email: [email protected] Houston, Texas 77060 Fax # 832-448-2466 Ben S. McMillan III, AIA, NCARB Principal-In-Charge ROOFING Arrow Consulting Corp. 104 Industrial Blvd., Suite 1 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 281-565-1155 281-565-2440 Fax MEP #1 Lee, Truong & Yu, PLLC 16225 Park Ten Pl #810 Houston, Texas 77084 281/945/8888 Aldine Senior High School Mechanical and Roof Replacement Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Slope Roof Application Information
    GROWTH AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Building and Zoning 123 West Indiana Ave., Deland, FL 32720 (386) 736-5929 Fax (386) 943-7096 RESIDENTIAL SLOPE ROOF APPLICATION INFORMATION Effective April 6, 2008 WHEN A ROOF ON AN EXISTING BUILDING IS WIND-BORNE REPLACED THAT HAS A VALUE =>$300,000 THIS COLUMN IS FOR INFORMATION AND DEBRIS AREA SECTION 101.2, 201.1 & 201.2 WILL APPLY EXAMPLES ONLY. RETROFITS BUILDING VALUATION WILL BE DETERMINED PER SECTION 101.2 ROOF-DECKING ATTACHMENT AND WHEN A ROOF ON AN EXISTING SITE-BUILT, THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE IS FASTENERS REROOFING PERMITS. SECTION 101.1 (a) REPLACED: SECTION 201.1 WILL APPLY. PEEL & STICK MUST COMPLY WITH SECTION 201.2 & ASTM D1970 THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO ALL SECONDARY [ ] ALL SHEATHING JOINTS REROOFING PERMITS. WATER BARRIER [ ] ENTIRE ROOF DECK EXAMPLE: [ ] ALL SHEATHING JOINTS SECTION 101 (b) Not required if underlayment is installed per 201.2 c) or d) [ X ] ENTIRE ROOF DECK EXAMPLE: 5” IN 12” (INCHES OF RISE IN 12” OF SLOPE: _____“ IN 12” RUN) AVERAGE ROOF EXAMPLE: 15 FEET (SINGLE STORY HEIGHT: _____ FEET BUILDING) EXAMPLE (S): ½” PLYWOOD, 5/8” OSB DECK TYPE: ___________________________________ UNDERLAYMENT: FBC Bldg 1507.2.3 Underlayment ** NOT REQUIRED IF TYPE : __________ LAYERS: _______ EXAMPLE: SHEATHING IS ASTM D 226, TYPE I or II [ ] 15 # Felt Type: __1__ Layers: __1__ COMPLETELY [ ] 30 # Felt [ x] ASTM D 226 [ ] 15# Felt COVERED WITH PEEL & Approved Synthetic [ ] ASU [ x ] 30# Felt STICK Underlayment ___________________________________ EXAMPLE: ROOF COVERING: MANUFACTURER ABC ROOFING PRODUCTS, INC. PINEVALLEY 30 AR ___________________________________________ PRODUCT EXAMPLE: 1675.4 (FL#) - OR – APPROVAL FLORIDA APPROVAL #: _______________________ NOA No 03-0528.06 (MIAMI/DADE) -OR- METHOD: MIAMI/DADE N.O.A.: __________________________ EXAMPLE: FASTENERS: TYPE:____________________________ 11/2” GALVANIZED ROOFING NAIL HURRICANE MITIGATION RETROFITS FOR EXISTING SITE-BUILT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES 101 Retrofits Required.
    [Show full text]