EVALUATION DESIGN

Integrated Population and Coastal Resources Management (IPOPCORM) Initiative SynergisticApproach

PATH Foundation views population management as an integral component of the “best management practices” for coastal resource management, and IPOPCORM as the optimum approach to obtain synergies that will maximize their impact

. LinkedEcoSocialSystem

• Ecosystems and human social systems form a unified whole, and whatever effects one affects the other. • Improvements in social and ecological systems reinforce one another, to turn around both systems from degradation to health EvaluationPlan 3 levels of evaluation

1. Evaluation of the integrated Population and CRM approach; 2. Impact evaluation of the IPOPCORM Project; and 3. Process evaluation of the IPOPCORM Project . Level1Evaluation

Conservation Intervention Province Hotspot Municipality PriorityRank

Integrated Calamianes Extremely High CRM-RH

RH-only Palawan Calamianes Extremely High Busuanga

CRM-only Palawan Cuyo Islands Very High Cuyo

Dumaran Control Palawan El Nido-Ulugan Extremely High EvaluationofIntegrated Approach

Central Hypothesis :

“There will be a significant improvement in coastal resources management outcomes and reproductive health/family planning outcomes by delivering these services in an integrated fashion as opposed to delivering either intervention in isolation.” Level1EvaluationDesign

A quasi-experimental design using baseline and post-project measurement of dependent variables is being used to test this hypothesis. QuasiExperimentalDesign 3 Intervention Groups

Identifier Description of the Intervention

Intervention 1 X1 The complete IPOPCORM intervention

Intervention 2 X2 The POP/RH intervention only

Intervention 3 X3 The CRM intervention only

Control C No intervention Group Quasi Experimental Design

Complete IPOPCORM O1 X1 O2 POP/RH O1 X2 O2 CRM O1 X3 O2 Control Group O1 C O2

Where O1 = pre-project baseline measurement of dependent variables O2 = post-project measurement of dependent variables X1 = Complete IPOPCORM X2 = POP/RH X3 = CRM C = Control Group Impact of Each Intervention

Impact of Intervention 1: IX 1 = (X 1O2-X1O1) – (CO 2-CO 1)

Where X 1O2 = post-project measurement of dependent variables for Intervention 1 X1O1 = baseline measurement of dependent variables for Intervention 1 CO 2 = post-project measurement of dependent variables for control group CO 1 = baseline measurement of dependent variables for control group

Impact of Intervention 2: IX 2 = (X 2O2-X2O1) – (CO 2-CO 1)

Impact of Intervention 3: IX 3 = (X 3O2-X3O1) – (CO 2-CO 1) Dependent Variables for P/RH and CRM to Measured

In X1, ∆P/RH1, ∆CRM1 In X2, ∆P/RH2, ∆CRM2 In X3, ∆P/RH3, ∆CRM3 IndicatorsforPOP/RH DependentVariables

• Unmet demand for family planning services among WRA (15-49 years) • Contraceptive prevalence among WRA – any method • Percent of sexually active young females (15-24 year) giving birth in past 12 months (recent youth fertility) • Percent of WRA giving birth in past 12 months • Percent of households with malnourished child under 3 years of age (weight-age) IndicatorsCRMDependent Variables

• Live coral coverage, dead coral/algae coverage • Coral diversity • Reef fish biomass and density • Reef fish species diversity, trophic diversity • Mangrove/seagrass coverage and productivity • % of households with full-time fishers (fishing effort) • % fishers using sustainable fishing methods e.g., hook and line • % respondents who know someone personally that engages in illegal fishing e.g., use of dynamite EvaluationPartners

Population/RH Assessment • Demographic Research and Development Foundation (DRDF) – University of the Philippines Population Institute (UPPI) Resource and Ecological Assessment • Marine Environment and Resource Foundation (MERF) – University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute (UPMSI) 2001BaselineFindings

Malnutrition (weight-for-age) in preschool children (under-threes) was observed in areas where ecosystems were degraded and fisheries over-exploited (“Malthusian overfishing”.) Children in fisher HH are twice as likely to be under-weight as children in HH with parents engaged in other occupations. Children of mothers not currently using FP are 3.3 times more likely to be malnourished as children of mothers who are current users. Trendsobservedin2004 FollowonSurvey FoodSecurityIndicators ↓ %HHwithunderweightpreschoolers(35.3%to32.1%) ↓ %HHreporting“sometimesnotenoughfood” (29.8%to15.2%) ↑ %HHwithaveragemonthlyincome≥P5000(35.3%to41.2%) ↑ %HHperceivethemselvesas“betteroffnowcomparedto5yrsago”

RHIndicators ↓ %WRAreportingunmetFPneed(51.6%to48.2%) ↑ CPRforallmethods(27.5%to33.30%) ↑ %maleswhosupportFP(88.5%to92.2%) ↓ %WRAwhohadbirthinpastyear(16.3%to15.8%) ↓ TFRamongWRA(from3.42to3.07)

 In2004,lessabortion wasreportedinsiteswherecommunitybasedFP interventionsarebeingimplemented(17%24%)comparedtothosewithno CBFP(2639%)

DRDFDraftFinalReport 2004IPOPCORMSurvey 2400HH6municipalities 2004FollowonSurvey

CRMIndicators

↓ %HHwithfulltimefishers(32.9%to20.7%)

↓ %HHmembers>10yrsintofulltimefishing(18.4%to10.0%)

↑%familymembersraisingsmalllivestock(from54%to73%)

↑%familymembersthat“alwayshelptoguardfish/mangrove sanctuary”

↑%familymembersthat“alwaysparticipateincouncil meetings” ComparativeAnalysis ImpactonRHIndicators

“ Itiswithyouth(age1524)that theIPOPCORMapproach producedmorepositive outcomesthanthoseyieldedby thestandaloneprograms.”

“ Adultsamples“nonequivalent” furtheranalysisneeded Youth 15-24 years in coastal Philippines

DRDFDraftFinalReport 2004IPOPCORMSurvey Indicatorsshowingpositivechanges withsignificantdifferenceofdifference thatsupportIPOPCORM’shypothesis:

 Proportionof“singlesexuallyactivemales”

 Proportionofyoungfemales“givingbirthin pastyear”

 Proportionofmarriedfemaleyouth“usinganyFP methodduringfirstsex”

 Proportionofyoungmarriedmaleswho“evergot IPOPCORMyouthcampactivities someonepregnant” ImpactonCRMindicators

“Thenumber,densityand biomassofcoralreeffish (targetandcommercially importantspecies)didnot changesignificantlyovertime”

“Interventionsappeartobe helpingtomaintainthe productivityanddiversityof ecosystems”

IPOPCORMyouthcampactivities Managementinterventionsshould becontinuedtodetermineifthe Integratedapproachisgenerating Higherimpactcomparedtosingle Sectorstrategies

MERF/UPMSI DraftFinalReport 2004IPOPCORMSurvey Next Step

• Hypothesis test using correspondence analysis and multi- dimensional scaling • Dissemination of results in peer-review journals and conferences • Advocacy efforts to scale-up the integrated approach