Case Study River Adur

Is the River Adur smell caused by historic or current industrial practices? There has been much debate on whether the sewage-like smell around potential pathways for oil to seep from the historic works to the the mouth of the River Adur is caused by current industrial practices foreshore [3]. Using this model may help determine what remedial or that of the former Brighton and Hove Gas Works. In addition to the measures can be actioned in order to alleviate the current issues. odour, there have been reports of black oily globules along the water line and thin films of oil upon the surface of the water[1] . This has sparked a demand for answers from the local community, specifically amongst swimmers, anglers, kite and windsurfers. One swimmer in particular reported swimming through an oil slick as far down as the western Hove Lawns. The Brighton and Hove Gas Works were developed along the eastern end of the Shoreham Port in c.1870 [2] (figure 1). The remains of this works currently lie below ground and have been identified as a strong contender for the origin of the oil seepage by officials at Shoreham Port [3]. A chemical analysis carried out on the oil has identified it as a potential product of the gas production process [3]. Approximately 750m to the west of the former gasworks lies the current Shoreham , which was opened in c.2002 by Scottish Power (figure 2). The power station uses a along with a and generator, representing one of the more efficient forms of thermal [4] . Students at the University of Sussex have also suggested that it’s ‘probably the most environmentally-friendly fossil-fuel power station in the UK’ [4]. Water quality testing undertaken by the local council prior to the appearance of foul odours coming from the River have indicated the safe nature of the water flowing down the Adur [3], so what has changed recently that has released these foul smells? As of the 24th July, Adur and Worthing Councils announced that research is still being carried out to determine and resolve the issue [5]. Figure 1. Brighton and Hove Gas Works c.1898 1. http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/13497269.Environment_Agency_investigates_pungent_smell_and_po - Further investigations carried out by officials at Shoreham Port tential_oil_spill_in_sea_and_river/ 2. http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/sussex/vol6/pt1/pp154-164 have been predominantly directed towards the former gasworks. 3. http://www.shoreham-port.co.uk/Oil-Seepage-on-Portslade-Beach They have included a Conceptual Site Model (CSM), used to identify 4. http://www.scottishpower.com/pages/shoreham_power_station.asp 5. https://adurworthingbulletintest.wordpress.com/2015/07/24/river-adur/

WWW.GROUNDSURE.COM