DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Is Weather Forecasting Still Under a Cloud ?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Is Weather Forecasting Still Under a Cloud ? Why is Weather Forecasting Still Under a Cloud ? Abstract: Weather forecasts are now impressively accurate, with short-term predictions achieving success rates of around 85 per cent. Despite this, forecasting remains the butt of much folklore, such as the notion that taking an umbrella on the advice of a forecast makes rain less likely to fall. Using probability theory, I show that such folklore has some basis in reality via the so-called "base-rate effect". The public's intuitive recognition of this effect may well explain their continued scepticism about weather forecasts. INTRODUCTION Weather forecasting is one of the triumphs of applied mathematics. World-wide data collection, sophisticated numerical models and state-of-the-art computing have now been combined by meteorologists to forecast the behaviour of this complex and non-linear phenomenon with impressive accuracy. The UK Meteorological Office, widely regarded as one of the best forecasting services in the world, currently reports computer model accuracies of 71 per cent for its 24 hr forecasts of rain, rising to 83 per cent following input from human forecasters1. Many people, however, remain resolutely sceptical of the reliability of weather forecasting: opinion polls show that dissatisfaction with Met Office forecasts currently runs at around 15-20 per cent1. Given the non-linearity of the weather system - and thus the sensitivity of forecasts to the unavoidably imperfect state of meteorological data - some level of dissatisfaction is, of course, inevitable. This source of public scepticism might best be tackled by promoting a wider awareness of the implications of chaos for weather forecasting. Another source of dissatisfaction lies in the limit on accuracy imposed by computer technology. Even using supercomputers capable of tens of gigaflops (thousand million floating point operations a second), today's numerical weather models are still too broad-brush to permit truly "local" forecasts to be made. As a result, it will be some years yet before forecasters are able to end the frustration of predictions proving accurate in one region, yet failing miserably just a few kilometres away. There is, however, a third source of dissatisfaction which appears not to have been widely recognised by meteorologists. At its heart is a probabilistic concept known as the "base rate effect", which ties the value of a forecast to the frequency of the phenomenon being forecast. In what follows, I use probability theory to show how even today's impressively accurate forecasting methods can fall foul of the base-rate effect, with consequences that can seem distinctly paradoxical. FORECASTS AND BAYES'S THEOREM The forecasting of any complex non-linear system such as the weather is inevitably a probabilistic process. The aim of the forecaster is thus be to produce predictions that are significantly more reliable than those achieved by random guessing. Mathematically, the forecasting process can be modelled by Bayes's Theorem, which shows how the odds on the occurrence of a specific event - say, a rain-shower - are improved (i.e. increased) in the light of a forecast: Odds(Event | Forecast) = LR x Odds(Event) (1) where Odds(Event) = Pr(Event)/Pr(~Event) etc., "~" denotes negation, " | " denotes "given", and "LR" is the Likelihood Ratio, defined by LR = Pr(Forecast | Event) / Pr(Forecast |~Event) (2) Forecasts based on random guessing are as likely to be right as wrong, and the odds of the event occurring in the light of such a forecast, Odds(Event | Guessing) are thus no higher than the "base-rate", Odds(Event). By (1), guessed forecasts can thus be characterised by a likelihood ratio of unity: they add no information about the chances of the event taking place. If a forecasting technique is to be useful, therefore, it must give LR > 1. The success of forecasting techniques is not usually stated in terms of likelihood ratios. Instead, it is typically given in terms of a somewhat vague concept such as "percentage of accurate forecasts". We can, however, convert such percentages into the corresponding likelihood ratios. Let R represent the event of rain, F be the event of rain being forecast, and Q the observed probability of the forecast proving correct, i.e. the frequency with which a forecast correctly predicts rain or correctly predicts no rain. As these latter events are mutually exclusive, we have Q = Pr(F & R) + Pr(~F & ~R) (3) = Pr(F | R).Pr(R) + Pr(~F |~R).Pr(~R) (4) Met Office data for rain forecasting2 shows that Pr(F | R) ~ Pr(~F |~R) so that (4) reduces to Q = Pr(F | R) = Pr(~F | ~R) (5) and the likelihood ratio LR becomes LR = Pr( F | R) / Pr(F | ~R) = Q /(1 - Q) (6) and so, by (1) Odds(Rain | Forecast) = Q . Odds(Rain) /(1 - (Q) (7) The UK Meteorological Office's stated accuracy rate for its 24hr forecasts is 83 per cent; putting Q = 0.83 into (6) implies that for Met Office forecasts we have LR = 4.9. To illustrate the implications of this, we note that the daily probability of rain for England and Wales is about 0.4, thus giving Odds(Rain) of 0.67. By (7), this implies that a forecast of rain made using the Met Office's 83 per cent accurate techniques lead to odds of rain taking place of 4.9 x 0.67 = 3.3; i.e. the forecast can be expected to be correct about 77 per cent of the time. This highlights two crucial aspects of the interpretation of forecasting. First, our perception of forecast accuracy is not determined solely by the accuracy rate Q. The quantity of real importance to users of forecasting data is the conditional probability Odds(Event | Forecast) - and as (1) shows, this depends crucially on the base-rate for the phenomenon being forecast, Odds(Event). Second, when this fact is taken into account, the probability of a specific forecast proving correct can be significantly lower than the accuracy figure quoted for the forecasting technique. For the Met Office forecasts of rain, for example, the accuracy figure of 83 per cent becomes, after allowance for the UK daily rain base-rate, a conditional probability of rain of 77 per cent. This reduction in perceived accuracy is the so-called "base-rate effect": the ability of a low base-rate to dilute the reliability of an accurate forecasting method. Neglect of the base-rate effect has been shown to have serious implications in fields as diverse as cancer screening3 and DNA profiling4. Its implications for weather forecasting, however, appear to have been largely overlooked. Yet as I now show, the base-rate effect can seriously - and negatively - affect public perception of the reliability of even highly accurate weather forecasts. BASE-RATES AND UMBRELLA-TAKING The essence of the base-rate is simply put. If an event is sufficiently rare, then even highly accurate forecasting methods can still fail to raise the chances of the event taking place above 50:50. From (7), this will happen for any phenomenon whose base rate is less than Pr(min) where Pr(min) < (1 - Q ) (8) With Q = 0.83, this leads to Pr(min) for Met Office forecasts of 0.17; predictions of weather events with a frequency below this are more likely to be wrong than right -despite the impressively high accuracy of the forecasting technology. For example, consider the well-known problem of deciding whether or not to take an umbrella in the light of a forecast of rain. At first glance, it would seem that Met Office forecasts are well-able to provide reliable advice on which to base such a decision. The daily base-rate for rain in England and Wales is 0.4, which exceeds the critical value of 0.17 by a comfortable margin. However, this probability is not appropriate for the umbrella-carrying problem; what we require is the probability of rain occurring on the hourly timescale relevant to umbrella-taking5: this is 0.08 - a much lower base-rate which does meets the inequality (8). From (7) we then find that the probability that we shall require our umbrella, following even an 83 per cent accurate forecast, is just 0.3. In other words, those in the UK who take an umbrella in response to a forecast will typically find themselves needlessly burdened with it about 2 times out of 3. The situation will be even worse for those living in South-East England, where the hourly probability of rain is only about half the national average. To this extent, the folklore that taking an umbrella reduces the chances of rain falling is borne out. It is not, of course, that the weather "knows" that one is carrying an umbrella. It is simply that placing one's complete faith in the forecast alone fails to take into account the relatively low base-rate of hourly rain in the UK. Indeed, in a recent paper6, I showed that decision theory leads to the conclusion that unless one is quite concerned about getting wet, the optimal decision is never to take an umbrella on walks, even if showers are forecast. It thus seems that public scepticism of weather forecasting may be an example of where ordinary people have a good, intuitive grasp of the impact of base-rates on their decision-making7: experience has told them that for the relatively short time they are out on a walk or shopping trip, the chances of rain falling are relatively low. Perhaps the Met Office could consider making this more clear in its forecasts, especially during showery weather. Certainly it would be wrong to respond by blaming the current inability of computer models to accurately forecast rain on hourly, rather than a daily, timescales: the low base-rate of hourly rain will still lead to apparently poor forecast reliability even if the Met Office does succeed in predict hourly showers with the same accuracy as its current forecasts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forecasting Tropical Cyclones
    Forecasting Tropical Cyclones Philippe Caroff, Sébastien Langlade, Thierry Dupont, Nicole Girardot Using ECMWF Forecasts – 4-6 june 2014 Outline . Introduction . Seasonal forecast . Monthly forecast . Medium- to short-range forecasts For each time-range we will see : the products, some elements of assessment or feedback, what is done with the products Using ECMWF Forecasts – 4-6 june 2014 RSMC La Réunion La Réunion is one of the 6 RSMC for tropical cyclone monitoring and warning. Its responsibility area is the south-west Indian Ocean. http://www.meteo.fr/temps/domtom/La_Reunion/webcmrs9.0/# Introduction Seasonal forecast Monthly forecast Medium- to short-range Other activities in La Réunion TRAINING Organisation of international training courses and workshops RESEARCH Research Centre for tropical Cyclones (collaboration with La Réunion University) LACy (Laboratoire de l’Atmosphère et des Cyclones) : https://lacy.univ-reunion.fr DEMONSTRATION SWFDP (Severe Weather Forecasting Demonstration Project) http://www.meteo.fr/extranets/page/index/affiche/id/76216 Introduction Seasonal forecast Monthly forecast Medium- to short-range Seasonal variability • The cyclone season goes from 1st of July to 30 June but more than 90% of the activity takes place between November and April • The average number of named cyclones (i.e. tropical storms) is 9. • But the number of tropical cyclones varies from year to year (from 3 to 14) Can the seasonal forecast systems give indication of this signal ? Introduction Seasonal forecast Monthly forecast Medium- to short-range Seasonal Forecast Products Forecasts of tropical cyclone activity anomaly are produced with ECMWF Seasonal Forecast System, and also with EUROSIP models (union of UKMO+ECMWF+NCEP+MF seasonal forecast systems) Other products can be informative, for example SST plots.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Lightning and Precipitation Prediction of Severe Convection Using of the Lightning Initiation Locations
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres RESEARCH ARTICLE Improving Lightning and Precipitation Prediction of Severe 10.1002/2017JD027340 Convection Using Lightning Data Assimilation Key Points: With NCAR WRF-RTFDDA • A lightning data assimilation method was developed Haoliang Wang1,2, Yubao Liu2, William Y. Y. Cheng2, Tianliang Zhao1, Mei Xu2, Yuewei Liu2, Si Shen2, • Demonstrate a method to retrieve the 3 3 graupel fields of convective clouds Kristin M. Calhoun , and Alexandre O. Fierro using total lightning data 1 • The lightning data assimilation Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information method improves the lightning and Science and Technology, Nanjing, China, 2National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA, 3Cooperative convective precipitation short-term Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies (CIMMS), NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, University of Oklahoma forecasts (OU), Norman, OK, USA Abstract In this study, a lightning data assimilation (LDA) scheme was developed and implemented in the Correspondence to: Y. Liu, National Center for Atmospheric Research Weather Research and Forecasting-Real-Time Four-Dimensional [email protected] Data Assimilation system. In this LDA method, graupel mixing ratio (qg) is retrieved from observed total lightning. To retrieve qg on model grid boxes, column-integrated graupel mass is first calculated using an Citation: observation-based linear formula between graupel mass and total lightning rate. Then the graupel mass is Wang, H., Liu, Y., Cheng, W. Y. Y., Zhao, distributed vertically according to the empirical qg vertical profiles constructed from model simulations. … T., Xu, M., Liu, Y., Fierro, A. O. (2017). Finally, a horizontal spread method is utilized to consider the existence of graupel in the adjacent regions Improving lightning and precipitation prediction of severe convection using of the lightning initiation locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Forecasting: a Collaboration of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and Xcel Energy
    Wind Energy Forecasting: A Collaboration of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and Xcel Energy Keith Parks Xcel Energy Denver, Colorado Yih-Huei Wan National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado Gerry Wiener and Yubao Liu University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) Boulder, Colorado NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. S ubcontract Report NREL/SR-5500-52233 October 2011 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Wind Energy Forecasting: A Collaboration of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and Xcel Energy Keith Parks Xcel Energy Denver, Colorado Yih-Huei Wan National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado Gerry Wiener and Yubao Liu University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) Boulder, Colorado NREL Technical Monitor: Erik Ela Prepared under Subcontract No. AFW-0-99427-01 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Subcontract Report 1617 Cole Boulevard NREL/SR-5500-52233 Golden, Colorado 80401 October 2011 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 This publication received minimal editorial review at NREL. NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Error Is the Feature: How to Forecast Lightning Using a Model Prediction Error [Applied Data Science Track, Category Evidential]
    The Error is the Feature: How to Forecast Lightning using a Model Prediction Error [Applied Data Science Track, Category Evidential] Christian Schön Jens Dittrich Richard Müller Saarland Informatics Campus Saarland Informatics Campus German Meteorological Service Big Data Analytics Group Big Data Analytics Group Offenbach, Germany ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: Despite the progress within the last decades, weather forecasting Christian Schön, Jens Dittrich, and Richard Müller. 2019. The Error is the is still a challenging and computationally expensive task. Current Feature: How to Forecast Lightning using a Model Prediction Error: [Ap- plied Data Science Track, Category Evidential]. In Proceedings of 25th ACM satellite-based approaches to predict thunderstorms are usually SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’19). based on the analysis of the observed brightness temperatures in ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. different spectral channels and emit a warning if a critical threshold is reached. Recent progress in data science however demonstrates 1 INTRODUCTION that machine learning can be successfully applied to many research fields in science, especially in areas dealing with large datasets. Weather forecasting is a very complex and challenging task requir- We therefore present a new approach to the problem of predicting ing extremely complex models running on large supercomputers. thunderstorms based on machine learning. The core idea of our Besides delivering forecasts for variables such as the temperature, work is to use the error of two-dimensional optical flow algorithms one key task for meteorological services is the detection and pre- applied to images of meteorological satellites as a feature for ma- diction of severe weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Sensor Improved Sea Surface Temperature (MISST) for GODAE
    Multi-sensor Improved Sea Surface Temperature (MISST) for GODAE Lead PI : Chelle L. Gentemann 438 First St, Suite 200; Santa Rosa, CA 95401-5288 Phone: (707) 545-2904x14 FAX: (707) 545-2906 E-mail: [email protected] CO-PI: Gary A. Wick NOAA/ETL R/ET6, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305 Phone: (303) 497-6322 FAX: (303) 497-6181 E-mail: [email protected] CO-PI: James Cummings Oceanography Division, Code 7320, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA 93943 Phone: (831) 656-5021 FAX: (831) 656-4769 E-mail: [email protected] CO-PI: Eric Bayler NOAA/NESDIS/ORA/ORAD, Room 601, 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20746 Phone: (301) 763-8102x102 FAX: ( 301) 763-8572 E-mail: [email protected] Award Number: NNG04GM56G http://www.ghrsst-pp.org http://www.usgodae.org LONG-TERM GOALS The Multi-sensor Improved Sea Surface Temperatures (MISST) for the Global Ocean Data Assimilation Experiment (GODAE) project intends to produce an improved, high-resolution, global, near-real-time (NRT), sea surface temperature analysis through the combination of satellite observations from complementary infrared (IR) and microwave (MW) sensors and to then demonstrate the impact of these improved sea surface temperatures (SSTs) on operational ocean models, numerical weather prediction, and tropical cyclone intensity forecasting. SST is one of the most important variables related to the global ocean-atmosphere system. It is a key indicator for climate change and is widely applied to studies of upper ocean processes, to air-sea heat exchange, and as a boundary condition for numerical weather prediction. The importance of SST to accurate weather forecasting of both severe events and daily weather has been increasingly recognized over the past several years.
    [Show full text]
  • An Operational Marine Fog Prediction Model
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE NATIONAL METEOROLOGICAL CENTER OFFICE NOTE 371 An Operational Marine Fog Prediction Model JORDAN C. ALPERTt DAVID M. FEIT* JUNE 1990 THIS IS AN UNREVIEWED MANUSCRIPT, PRIMARILY INTENDED FOR INFORMAL EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AMONG NWS STAFF MEMBERS t Global Weather and Climate Modeling Branch * Ocean Products Center OPC contribution No. 45 An Operational Marine Fog Prediction Model Jordan C. Alpert and David M. Feit NOAA/NMC, Development Division Washington D.C. 20233 Abstract A major concern to the National Weather Service marine operations is the problem of forecasting advection fogs at sea. Currently fog forecasts are issued using statistical methods only over the open ocean domain but no such system is available for coastal and offshore areas. We propose to use a partially diagnostic model, designed specifically for this problem, which relies on output fields from the global operational Medium Range Forecast (MRF) model. The boundary and initial conditions of moisture and temperature, as well as the MRF's horizontal wind predictions are interpolated to the fog model grid over an arbitrarily selected coastal and offshore ocean region. The moisture fields are used to prescribe a droplet size distribution and compute liquid water content, neither of which is accounted for in the global model. Fog development is governed by the droplet size distribution and advection and exchange of heat and moisture. A simple parameterization is used to describe the coefficients of evaporation and sensible heat exchange at the surface. Depletion of the fog is based on droplet fallout of the three categories of assumed droplet size.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical-Cyclone Forecasting: a Worldwide Summary of Techniques
    John L. McBride and Tropical-Cyclone Forecasting: Greg J. Holland Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, A Worldwide Summary Melbourne 3001, of Techniques and Australia Verification Statistics Abstract basis for discussion at particular sessions planned for the work- shop. Replies to this questionnaire were received from 16 of- Questionnaire replies from forecasters in 16 tropical-cyclone warning fices. These are listed in Table 1, grouped according to their centers are summarized to provide an overview of the current state of ocean basins. Encouraged by the high information content of the science in tropical-cyclone analysis and forecasting. Information is tabulated on the data sources and techniques used, on their role and these responses, the authors sent a second questionnaire on the perceived usefulness, and on the levels of verification and accuracy of analysis and forecasting of cyclone position and motion. Re- cyclone forecasting. plies to this were received from 13 of the listed offices. This paper tabulates and syntheses information provided on the following aspects of tropical-cyclone forecasting: 1) the techniques used; 2) the level of verification; and 3) the level 1. Introduction of accuracy of analyses and forecasts. Separate sections cover forecasting of cyclone formation; analyzing cyclone structure Tropical cyclones are the major severe weather hazard for a and intensity; forecasting structure and intensity; analyzing cy- large "slice" of mankind. The Bangladesh cyclones of 1970 and 1985, Hurricane Camille (USA, 1969) and Cyclone Tracy (Australia, 1974) to name just four, would figure prominently TABLE 1. Forecast offices from which unofficial replies were re- in any list of major natural disasters of this century.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY
    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Weather Forecasting Tip Sheet: WFO Louisville
    Severe Weather Forecasting Tip Sheet: WFO Louisville Vertical Wind Shear & SRH Tornadic Supercells 0-6 km bulk shear > 40 kts – supercells Unstable warm sector air mass, with well-defined warm and cold fronts (i.e., strong extratropical cyclone) 0-6 km bulk shear 20-35 kts – organized multicells Strong mid and upper-level jet observed to dive southward into upper-level shortwave trough, then 0-6 km bulk shear < 10-20 kts – disorganized multicells rapidly exit the trough and cross into the warm sector air mass. 0-8 km bulk shear > 52 kts – long-lived supercells Pronounced upper-level divergence occurs on the nose and exit region of the jet. 0-3 km bulk shear > 30-40 kts – bowing thunderstorms A low-level jet forms in response to upper-level jet, which increases northward flux of moisture. SRH Intense northwest-southwest upper-level flow/strong southerly low-level flow creates a wind profile which 0-3 km SRH > 150 m2 s-2 = updraft rotation becomes more likely 2 -2 is very conducive for supercell development. Storms often exhibit rapid development along cold front, 0-3 km SRH > 300-400 m s = rotating updrafts and supercell development likely dryline, or pre-frontal convergence axis, and then move east into warm sector. BOTH 2 -2 Most intense tornadic supercells often occur in close proximity to where upper-level jet intersects low- 0-6 km shear < 35 kts with 0-3 km SRH > 150 m s – brief rotation but not persistent level jet, although tornadic supercells can occur north and south of upper jet as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Forecasting
    4 Weather forecasting ELEMENTARY from the Esri GeoInquiries™ collection for Upper Elementary Target audience – Upper elementary Time required – 15 minutes Activity This activity helps students interpret weather maps and make weather predictions. Standards NGSS:4-ESS2-1. Make observations and/or measurements to provide evidence of the effects of weathering or the rate of erosion by water, ice, wind, or vegetation. NGSS:4-ESS2-2. Analyze and interpret data from maps to describe patterns of the earth’s features. C3:D2.Geo.4.K-2. Explain how weather, climate, and other environmental characteristics affect people’s lives in a place or region. Learning Outcomes • Students will use temperature, pressure, and precipitation maps to analyze current weather conditions. • Students will use a current weather map to predict weather in the future. Map URL: http://esriurl.com/fourGeoinquiry12 Engage What weather can you predict from temperatures? ʅ Click the URL link above to open the map, or type it in to your Internet browser. ? What patterns do you see on the forecasted temperature map? [Cold in the Northeast and across the Rocky Mountain region; warm across the far West, Southwest, and most of the South.] ? Based on temperature data, if precipitation was falling across the U.S., where would it be rain and where would it be snow? [It would be snow in the Northeast and Rockies, and rain everywhere else.] ? How would you know where the snow would be? [Where temperatures are below freezing.] Explore Where are high and low pressures? ʅ From the Details pane, click the Show Contents Of Map button.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather and Climate Forecasting
    ~. j ?? WEATHER AND CLIMATE FORECASTING Mark S. Roulston and Leonard A. Smith University of Oxford and London School of Economics History of Forecasting: Statistics vs Dynamics "When it is evening ye say, it will be fair weather for the sky is red. And in the morning, it will be foul weather today for the sky is red and lowering." (Matthew Ch. 16 v. 2) he Biblical quotation above is an ancient example of attempting to make meteorological predictions based on empirical observations. The idea it T contains tends to work as a forecasting scheme, and it has been expressed in many different ways in the subsequent 2,000 years. it is one of many sayings and rhymes of folklore that provide a qualitative description of the weather. In the 17th century, the introduction of instruments to measure atmospheric variables meant that meteorology became a quantitative science. By the 19th century meteorological data was being collected all over Europe. It was during the 1800s that many scientists began lamenting the fact that the collection of meteorological data had far outpaced attempts to analyse and understand this data (Lempfert 1932). Attempts had been to find patterns in tables of meteorological, but these had usually ended in failure. One example is the efforts to link weather to celestial motions made by the Palatine Mteorological Society of Mannheim (the World's first such society) in the late 18th century. The breakthrough came when scientists began plotting the growing meteorological database on maps; the tendency of mid-latitude low-pressure systems to advance eastward was discovered: clouds in the west provide a red sky at dawn before bringing bad weather, clouds in the east redden the sky at sunset before making way for clear skies.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasting Peak Wind Gusts Using Meteorologically Stratified Gust
    JUNE 2020 K A H L 1129 Forecasting Peak Wind Gusts Using Meteorologically Stratified Gust Factors and MOS Guidance JONATHAN D. W. KAHL Atmospheric Science Group, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Manuscript received 16 March 2020, in final form 16 April 2020) ABSTRACT Gust prediction is an important element of weather forecasting services, yet reliable methods remain elusive. Peak wind gusts estimated by the meteorologically stratified gust factor (MSGF) model were eval- uated at 15 locations across the United States during 2010–17. This model couples gust factors, site-specific climatological measures of ‘‘gustiness,’’ with wind speed and direction forecast guidance. The model was assessed using two forms of model output statistics (MOS) guidance at forecast projections ranging from 1 to 72 h. At 11 of 15 sites the MSGF model showed skill (improvement over climatology) in predicting peak gusts out to projections of 72 h. This has important implications for operational wind forecasting because the method can be utilized at any location for which the meteorologically stratified gust factors have been de- termined. During particularly windy conditions the MSGF model exhibited skill in predicting peak gusts at forecast projections ranging from 6 to 72 h at roughly half of the sites analyzed. Site characteristics and local wind climatologies were shown to exert impacts on gust factor model performance. The MSGF method represents a viable option for the operational prediction of peak wind gusts, although model performance will be sensitive to the quality of the necessary wind speed and direction forecasts. 1. Introduction (Adame et al.
    [Show full text]