Foundations of Methodology an Overview of Language Teaching 1 Methods and Approaches

Home , Comprehension approach, Language pedagogy, Silent Way

Unit i

Foundations of Methodology An Overview of Language Teaching 1 Methods and Approaches

Marianne Cel c e - M u r c i a

Key Questions ➤➤ What are the methods and approaches that language teachers have used over the years to teach foreign or second languages? ➤➤ What are the current methodological trends and challenges? ➤➤ Where does language teaching methodology appear to be heading?

Experience in this chapter). A method, on the other hand, is a set of procedures for Anthony. It spells out A committee of professors reviewing applications rather precisely in a step-by-step manner how to for their graduate program in TESOL come upon teach a second or foreign language. Examples of the statement of another applicant who declares methods are the Silent Way, Community Language in his statement of purpose that he wishes to be Learning, and Suggestopedia (all of which are also admitted to discover or (more ambitiously) to described here). A method is more specific than develop the one best method for teaching English an approach but less specific than a technique. as a second or foreign language. Several com- Anthony’s methods are typically compatible with mittee members utter words of impatience and one (or sometimes two) approaches. A technique disappointment: in Anthony’s system is a specific classroom activity; “Oh, no! Not another one!” it thus represents the most specific and concrete “Here we go again!” of the three concepts that he discusses. Some techniques are widely used and found in many methods The reasons for the committee’s reactions to this (e.g., dictation, listen and repeat drills, and read statement of purpose will become clear in the the passage and fill in the blanks); other tech- course of this chapter. niques, however, are specific to or characteristic of a given method (e.g., using cuisenaire rods in the Silent Way) (Gattegno, 1976). What Is a Method or an A more recent framework for discussing lan- Approach to Language guage teaching methodology has been proposed by Richards and Rodgers (2001); it is presented Teaching? in Figure 1. Richards and Rodgers use method as Anthony (1963) was one of the first applied lin- the most general and overarching term. Under guists to distinguish the terms approach, method, method, they have the terms approach, design, and and technique as they apply to language teach- procedure. Their use of the term approach is similar ing.1 For Anthony, an approach reflects a theo- to Anthony’s use, but their concept is more com- retical model or research paradigm. It provides prehensive and explicit. It includes theories of the a broad philosophical perspective on language nature of language (including units of language teaching, such as found in the justifications for analysis) and the nature of language learning the direct method, the reading approach, or with reference to psychological and pedagogical the communicative approach (all are discussed principles. The design portion of Richards and

2 Method

Approach Design Procedure

a. A theory of the nature of language a. The general and specic objectives of the method a. Classroom techniques, practices, and behaviors – an account of the nature of language b. A syllabus model observed when the method is used prociency – criteria for the selection and organization of linguis- – resources in terms of time, space, and equip- – an account of the basic units of language tic and/or subject-matter content ment used by the teacher structure c. Types of learning and teaching activities – interactional patterns observed in lessons – kinds of tasks and practice activities to be employed – tactics and strategies used by teachers and b. A theory of the nature of language learning in the classroom and in materials learners when the method is being used – an account of the psycholinguistic and cog- d. Learner roles nitive processes involved in language – types of learning tasks set for learners learning – degree of control learners have over the content of – an account of the conditions that allow for learning successful use of these processes – patterns of learner groupings that are recommended or implied – degree to which learners inuence the learning of others – the view of the learner as a processor, performer, in- itiator, problem solver, etc. e. Teacher roles – types of functions teachers fulll – degree of teacher inuence over learning – degree to which the teacher determines the content of learning – types of interaction between teachers and learners f. The role of instructional materials – primary function of materials – the form materials take (e.g., textbook, audiovisual) – relation of materials to other input – assumptions made about teachers and learners

Figure 1. Summary of elements and subelements that constitute a method (adapted from J. C. Richards & T. S. Rodgers, 2001).

Rodgers’s framework entails the curriculum objec- chemistry, in which progress is more or less steady tives and syllabus types (e.g., structural, notional- until a major discovery causes a radical theoretical functional, or content-based). (See Graves, this revision (referred to as a paradigm shift by Kuhn, volume.) It also includes learning and teaching 1970), language teaching is a field in which fads activities and spells out the roles of teachers and and heroes have come and gone in a manner learners. Finally, it includes instructional materials fairly consistent with the kinds of changes that along with their form, function, and role in the occur when people jump from one bandwagon teaching-learning process. The term procedure for to the next (M. Clarke, 1982). One reason for the Richards and Rodgers refers to techniques, prac- frequent swings of the pendulum is that very few tices, behaviors, and equipment observable in the language teachers have a sense of history about classroom. The interactional patterns and the strat- their profession and are thus unaware of the egies used by teachers and students are also part linguistic, psychological, and sociocultural under- of their procedural component. (See Brinton, this pinnings of the many methodological options volume.) they have at their disposal. It is hoped that this overview will encourage language teachers to learn more about the origins of their profession. Such Conceptual Underpinnings knowledge will ensure some perspective when The field of second language (L2) teaching has teachers evaluate any so-called innovations or new undergone many fluctuations and shifts over the approaches to methodology, developments that years. In contrast to disciplines like physics or will surely arise in the future.

Chapter 1 3 Pre-twentieth-century trends: A survey Latin as a first language anymore, and various of key approaches European vernaculars (languages with an oral tradition but with little or no written tradition) Prior to the twentieth century, language teach- had begun to rise in respectability and popularity; ing methodology vacillated between two types of these vernacular languages, such as French and approaches: getting learners to use a language German, had begun to develop their own written (i.e., to speak and understand it) and getting traditions (Prator, 1974).2 learners to analyze a language (i.e., to learn its Since the European vernaculars had grown in grammatical rules). Both the classical Greek and prestige and utility, it is not surprising that people medieval Latin periods were characterized by in one country or region began to find it necessary an emphasis on teaching people to use foreign and useful to learn the language of another coun- languages. The classical languages, first Greek try or region. Thus during the early seventeenth and then Latin, were used as lingua francas (i.e., century the focus on language study shifted from languages used for communication among people an exclusive analysis of the classical languages back speaking different first languages). Higher learn- to a focus on utility. Perhaps the most famous lan- ing was conducted primarily through these language teacher and methodologist of this period guages all over Europe. Manuscripts and letters is Johann (or Jan) Amos Comenius, a Czech were written in these languages. They were used scholar and teacher, who published books about widely in philosophy, religion, politics, and busi- his teaching techniques between 1631 and 1658. ness. Thus the educated elite became fluent Some of the techniques that Comenius used and speakers, readers, and writers of the classical espoused were: language appropriate to their time and context ■ Use imitation instead of rules to teach a lan- (Prator, 1974). guage. We can assume that during these earlier eras ■ Have your students repeat after you. language teachers or tutors used informal and ■ Use a limited vocabulary initially. more or less direct approaches to convey the form ■ Help your students practice reading and and meaning of the language they were teaching speaking. and that they used aural-oral techniques with no ■ teach language through pictures to make it language textbooks per se; instead, they probably meaningful. had a small stock of hand-copied written manuscripts of some sort, perhaps a few texts in the Thus Comenius, perhaps for the first time, made target language (the language being learned), or explicit an essentially inductive approach to learn- crude dictionaries that listed equivalent words in ing a foreign language (i.e., an approach based on two or more languages side by side. exposure to the target language in use rather than During the Renaissance, the formal study of through rules), the goal of which was to teach the the grammars of Greek and Latin became popu- use rather than the analysis of the language being lar through the mass production of books made taught (Kelly, 1969). possible by Gutenberg’s invention of moveable The next section of this chapter outlines the type and the printing press in 1440. In the case of major approaches that still resonate and influence Latin, it was discovered that the grammar of the the practice of language teaching today—some to classical texts was different from that of the Latin a greater and some to a lesser degree. then being used as a lingua franca—the latter sub- sequently being labeled vulgate Latin (the Latin The grammar-translation approach. Comenius’s of the common people). Major differences had progressive views held sway for some time; however, developed between the classical Latin described by the beginning of the nineteenth century, the in the Renaissance grammars, which became systematic study of the grammar of classical Latin the formal object of instruction in schools, and and of classical texts had once again taken hold in the Latin being used for everyday purposes. schools and universities throughout Europe. The This occurred at about the same time that Latin analytical grammar-translation approach became was gradually beginning to be abandoned as firmly entrenched as a way to teach not only Latin a lingua franca. No one was speaking classical but also, by extension, the vernaculars that had

4 Unit I become modern languages as well. Grammar- ■ Grammar is learned inductively (i.e., by translation was perhaps best codified in the work repeated exposure to language in use, not of Karl Ploetz (1819–1881), a German scholar through rules about forms). who had a tremendous influence on the language ■ Literary texts are read for pleasure and are teaching profession during his lifetime and after- not analyzed grammatically. ward. The following is a synthesis of the key ele- ■ the target culture is also taught inductively. ments of the grammar-translation approach (Kelly, ■ the teacher must be a native speaker or have 1969): native-like proficiency in the target language. ■ instruction is given in the native language of The influence of the direct method grew; the students. it crossed the Atlantic in the early twentieth ■ there is little use of the target language for century when Emile de Sauzé, a disciple of Gouin, communication. traveled to Cleveland, Ohio, to see to it that all ■ the focus is on grammatical parsing, that is, foreign language instruction in the public schools the forms and inflections of words. there implemented the direct method. De Sauzé’s ■ there is early reading of difficult texts. endeavor, however, was not completely successful ■ A typical exercise is to translate sentences (in Cleveland or elsewhere) since at the time there from the target language into the mother were too few foreign language teachers in the tongue (or vice versa). United States who were highly proficient speakers ■ the result of this approach is usually an of the language they were teaching (Prator, 1974). inability on the part of the student to use the language for communication. The reform movement. In 1886, during the same ■ the teacher does not have to be able to speak period that the direct method first became popular the target language fluently. in Europe, the International Phonetic Association was established by scholars such as Henry Sweet, The direct method. The swinging of the Wilhelm Viëtor, and Paul Passy. They developed pendulum continued. By the end of the nine- the International Phonetic Alphabet—a transcrip- teenth century, the direct method, which once tion system designed to unambiguously represent more stressed as its goal the ability to use rather the sounds of any language—and became part than to analyze a language, had begun to func- of the reform movement in language teaching tion as a viable alternative to grammar-translation. in the 1890s. These phoneticians made some of François Gouin, a Frenchman, began to publish his the first truly scientific contributions to language work on the direct method in 1880.3 He advocated teaching when they advocated principles such as exclusive use of the target language in the class- the following (Howatt, 2004): room, having been influenced by an older friend, the German philosopher-scientist Alexander von ■ the spoken form of a language is primary Humboldt, who had espoused the notion that and should be taught first. a language cannot be taught, that one can only ■ the findings of phonetics should be applied create conditions for learning to take place (Kelly, to language teaching. 1969). The direct method became very popular ■ Language teachers must have solid training in France and Germany, and even today it has in phonetics. enthusiastic followers among language teachers in ■ Learners should be given basic phonetic many countries (as does the grammar-translation training to establish good speech habits. approach). Key features of the direct method are: The work of these influential phoneticians focused ■ no use of the mother tongue is permitted on the teaching of pronunciation and oral skills, (i.e., the teacher does not need to know the which they felt had been ignored in grammar- students’ native language). translation. Thus, although the reform movement ■ Lessons begin with dialogues and anecdotes is not necessarily considered a full-blown peda- in modern conversational style. gogical approach to language teaching, its adher- ■ Actions and pictures are used to make mean- ents did have a significant influence on certain ings clear. subsequent approaches, as we will see.

Chapter 1 5 Early and mid-twentieth-century (phonemes), which then form lexical and gram- approaches matical elements (morphemes), which then form higher structures such as phrases and clauses/sen- The reading approach. In the early decades tences (Bloomfield, 1933). In behavioral psychol- of the twentieth century, the Modern Language ogy, learning is based on getting learners to repeat Association of America, based on the Coleman behaviors (verbal or nonverbal) until they become Report (Coleman, 1929), endorsed the reading fully learned habits (Skinner, 1957). The audio- approach to language teaching. The report’s lingual approach became dominant in the United authors felt that, given the skills and limitations of States during the late 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s. Its most language teachers, all that one could reason- features include: ably expect was for students to come away from ■ Lessons begin with dialogues. the study of a foreign language being able to read ■ Mimicry and memorization are used, based the target language, with emphasis on some of the on the assumption that language learning is great works of literature and philosophy that had habit formation. been produced in that language. As reflected in ■ Grammatical structures are sequenced and the work of Michael West (1941) and others, this rules are taught inductively (through planned approach held sway in North America until the exposure). late 1930s and early 1940s. Elements of the reading ■ Skills are sequenced: first listening and speak- approach are: ing are taught; reading and writing are post- ■ Only the grammar useful for reading com- poned. prehension is taught. ■ Accurate pronunciation is stressed from the ■ Vocabulary is controlled at first (based on fre- beginning. quency and usefulness) and then expanded. ■ Vocabulary is severely controlled and limited ■ translation is once more a respectable class- in the initial stages. room procedure. ■ A great effort is made to prevent learner ■ Reading comprehension is the only language errors. skill emphasized. ■ Language is often manipulated without ■ the teacher does not need to have good oral regard to meaning or context. proficiency in the target language. ■ the teacher must be proficient only in the ■ the first language is used to present reading structures, vocabulary, and other aspects of material, discuss it, and check understanding. the language that he or she is teaching, since learning activities and materials are carefully The audiolingual approach. Some historians of controlled. language teaching (e.g., Howatt, 2004) believe that the earlier reform movement played a role The oral-situational approach. In Britain the in the simultaneous development of both the same historical pressures that prompted the audiolingual approach in the United States and development of the audiolingual approach the oral-situational approach in Britain (discussed gave rise to the oral or situational approach next). When World War II broke out and made (Eckersley, 1955). It arose as a reaction to the it imperative for the U.S. military to quickly and reading approach and its lack of emphasis on efficiently teach members of the armed forces listening and speaking skills (Howatt, 2004). This how to speak foreign languages and to under- approach was dominant in Britain during the late stand them when spoken by native speakers, the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s; it drew on the reform U.S. government hired linguists to help teach movement and the direct approach but added languages and develop materials: the audiolingual features from Firthian linguistics (Firth, 1957)4 approach was born (Fries, 1945). It drew on both and the emerging professional field of language the reform movement and the direct method but pedagogy. It also drew on the experience that added features from structural linguistics and Britain’s language educators had accrued in oral behavioral psychology. Structural linguistics begins approaches to foreign language teaching (e.g., with describing minimally distinctive sound units Palmer, 1921/1964). Although influenced by,

6 Unit I but less dogmatic than, its American counterpart language acquisition is viewed as the learning of (the audiolingual approach), the oral-situational a system of infinitely extendable rules based on approach advocated organizing structures around meaningful exposure, with hypothesis testing and situations (e.g., “at the pharmacy” or “at the rule inferencing, not habit formation, driving restaurant”) that provided the learner with maxi- the learning process. Features of the cognitive mum opportunity to practice the target language. approach include: However, practice often consisted of little more ■ Language learning is viewed as rule acquisi- than pattern practice, choral repetition, or read- tion, not habit formation. ing of texts and memorization of dialogues. ■ Instruction is often individualized; learners Features of the oral-situational approach include: are responsible for their own learning. ■ The spoken language is primary. ■ Grammar must be taught, but it can be taught ■ All language material is practiced orally deductively (rules first, practice later) and/ before being presented in written form (read- or inductively (rules can either be stated after ing and writing are taught only after an oral practice or left as implicit information for the base in lexical and grammatical forms has learners to process on their own). been established). ■ Pronunciation is deemphasized; perfection is ■ Only the target language should be used in viewed as unrealistic and unattainable. the classroom. ■ Reading and writing are once again as impor- ■ Efforts are made to ensure that the most gen- tant as listening and speaking. eral and useful lexical items are presented. ■ Vocabulary learning is again stressed, espe- ■ Grammatical structures are graded from sim- cially at intermediate and advanced levels. ple to complex. ■ Errors are viewed as inevitable, to be used ■ New items (lexical and grammatical) are intro- constructively for enhancing the learning duced and practiced situationally (e.g., “at the process (for feedback and correction). post office,” “at the bank,” “at the dinner table”). ■ The teacher is expected to have good general proficiency in the target language as well as an ability to analyze the target language. More recent approaches to language The affective-humanistic approach. This approach teaching developed as a reaction to the general lack of In addition to the above approaches whose his- affective considerations in both the audiolingual torical developments have been sketched here, approach and the cognitive approach (e.g., Curran, there are four other discernible approaches to 1976; Moskowitz, 1978).5 It put emphasis on the foreign language teaching that developed and social climate in the classroom and the develop- were widely used during the final quarter of the ment of positive relationships between the teacher twentieth century; some of them continue into the and the learners and among the learners them- early twenty-first century. In this section, I briefly selves. It argues that learning a language is a social describe key features of the cognitive, affective- and personal process and that this has to be taken humanistic, comprehension-based, and communi- into account in the methods and materials used. cative approaches. Following are some of the defining characteristics of the affective-humanistic approach: The cognitive approach. This approach was a reaction to the behaviorist features of the audiolin- ■ Respect for each individual (students and gual approach, influenced by cognitive psychology teachers) and for their feelings is empha- and Chomskyan linguistics. Cognitive psychology sized. (Neisser, 1967) holds that people do not learn com- ■ Communication that is personally meaning- plex systems like language or mathematics through ful to the learner is given priority. habit formation but through the acquisition of ■ Instruction involves much work in pairs and patterns and rules that they can then extend and small groups. apply to new circumstances or problems. Likewise, ■ The class atmosphere is viewed as more in Chomskyan linguistics (Chomsky, 1959, 1965), important than materials or methods.

Chapter 1 7 ■ Peer support and interaction are viewed as ■ If the teacher is not a native (or near-native) necessary for learning. speaker, appropriate audiovisual materials must ■ Learning a second or foreign language is be available online and in the classroom or lab to viewed as a self-realization process. provide the appropriate input for the learners. ■ The teacher is a counselor or facilitator rather than the ultimate source of knowledge. The communicative approach. This approach ■ The teacher should be proficient in the is an outgrowth of the work of anthropological target language and in the students’ native linguists in the United States (e.g., Hymes, 1971) language since translation may be used heav- and Firthian linguists in Britain (e.g., Firth, 1957; ily in the initial stages to help students feel at Halliday, 1973, 1978), all of whom view language ease; later, it is gradually phased out. as a meaning-based system for communication. (See Duff, this volume, for an extended discus- The comprehension-based approach. This is an sion.) Now serving as an umbrella term for a num- outgrowth of research in first language (L1) acqui- ber of designs and procedures (to use Richards sition that led some language methodologists to and Rodgers’s terminology) the communicative assume that second language (L2) learning is approach includes task-based language teaching very similar to L1 acquisition and that extended and project work, content-based and immersion exposure and comprehension (i.e., listening with instruction, and Cooperative Learning (Kagan, 1994), understanding) must precede production (i.e., among other instructional frameworks. (See also speaking (Asher, 1996; Krashen & Terrell, 1983; chapters by Nunan and Snow, this volume.) Some Postovsky, 1974; Winitz, 1981). The best-known of of the salient features and manifestations of the the comprehension-based approaches is Krashen communicative approach are: and Terrell’s Natural Approach (1983). The characteristics of the comprehension-based approach ■ It is assumed that the goal of language teach- are: ing is the learners’ ability to communicate in the target language. ■ Listening comprehension is very important ■ It is assumed that the content of a language and is viewed as the basic skill that will allow course will include semantic notions and speaking, reading, and writing to develop social functions and that they are as impor- spontaneously over time, given the right con- tant as linguistic structures. ditions. ■ In some cases, the content is academic or job- ■ Learners should begin with a silent period related material, which becomes the course by listening to meaningful speech and by focus with language learning as a simultane- responding nonverbally in meaningful ways ous concern. before they produce language themselves. ■ Students regularly work in groups or pairs to ■ Learners should not speak until they feel transfer and negotiate meaning in situations ready to do so; such delayed oral production in which one person has information that the results in better pronunciation than if the other(s) lack. learner is expected to speak immediately. ■ Students often engage in role play or dra- ■ Learners progress by being exposed to mean- matization to adjust their use of the target ingful input that is just one step beyond their language to different social contexts. level of proficiency. ■ Classroom materials and activities often con- ■ Rule learning may help learners monitor (or sist of authentic tasks and projects presented become aware of) what they do, but it will not and practiced using segments of preexisting aid their acquisition or spontaneous use of meaningful discourse, not materials primarily the target language. constructed for pedagogical purposes. ■ Error correction is seen as unnecessary and ■ Skills are integrated from the beginning; a perhaps even counterproductive; what is given activity might involve reading, speaking, important is that the learners can understand listening, and also writing (this assumes the and can make themselves understood. learners are educated and literate).

8 Unit I Table 1. Central Principles of Four Current Approaches to Language Teaching

Approach Central Principle Cognitive approach Language learning is rule-governed cognitive behavior (not habit formation). Affective-humanistic approach Learning a foreign language is a process of self-realization and of relating to other people. Comprehension approach Language acquisition occurs if and only if the learner receives and comprehends sufficient meaningful input. Communicative approach The purpose of language (and thus the goal of language teaching and learning) is communication.

■ the teacher’s role is primarily to facilitate com- Community Language Learning. (Curran, 1976) munication and secondarily to correct errors. Sitting in a circle, and with the session being ■ the teacher should be able to use the target recorded, students decide what they want to say. language fluently and appropriately. The teacher as counselor-facilitator then translates and gets learners to practice in the target language To sum up, we can see that certain features the material that was elicited. Later at the board, of several of the pre-twentieth-century approaches the teacher goes over the words and structures the arose in reaction to perceived inadequacies class is learning and provides explanations in the or impracticalities in an earlier approach or L1 as needed. approaches. The more recent approaches developed in the twentieth century and expanded in Total Physical Response. (Asher, 1996) The the early twenty-first century also do this to some teacher gives commands, “Stand up!” “Sit down!” extent; however, each one is based on a slightly and so on and shows learners how to demonstrate different theory or view of how people learn or comprehension by doing the appropriate physical use second languages, and each has a central action as a response. New structures and vocabu- principle around which everything else revolves, lary are introduced this way for an extended time. as summarized in Table 1. When learners are ready to speak, they begin to give each other commands. Only the target Designer methods. In addition to the four language is used. approaches already discussed, several other methods proliferated in the 1970s and 1980s; these have Suggestology, Suggestopedia, or Accelerated Learning. been labeled designer methods by Nunan (1989b). (Lozanov, 1978) In a setting more like a living These methods were rather specific in terms of room than a classroom, learners sit in easy chairs the procedures and materials that the teacher, and assume a new identity; the teacher, using only who typically required special training, was sup- the target language, presents a script two times posed to use. They were almost always developed over two days, accompanied by music. This is fol- and defined by one person. This person, in turn, lowed by group or choral reading of the script on trained practitioners who accepted the method as the first day, along with songs and games. On the gospel and helped to spread the word. Several of second day, the students elaborate on the script to these methods and their originators follow with tell an anecdote or story. The learners have copies brief descriptions: of the script along with an L1 translation juxta- posed on the same page. The process continues Silent Way. (Gattegno, 1976) Using an array of with new scripts. visuals (e.g., rods of different shapes and colors, and charts with words or color-coded sounds), the The lockstep rigidity found in such designer teacher gets students to practice and learn a new methods led some applied linguists (e.g., Richards, language while saying very little in the process. The 1984) to seriously question their usefulness. This method is inductive, and only the target language aroused a healthy skepticism among language is used. educators, who argued that there is no such thing

Chapter 1 9 as a “best” method; Strevens (1977) was among the have noted, H. D. Brown (2002), in his critique earliest to articulate skepticism about the various of methods, adds the following two observations: proliferating methods: (1) so-called designer methods seem distinctive at the initial stage of learning but soon come to the complex circumstances of teaching and look like any other learner-centered approach; and learning languages—with different kinds (2) it has proven impossible to empirically (i.e., of pupils, teachers, aims, and objectives, quantitatively) demonstrate the superiority of one approaches, methods, and materials, classroom method over another. Brown (2002) concludes that techniques and standards of achievement— classroom teachers do best when they ground their make it inconceivable that any single method pedagogy in “well-established principles of language could achieve optimum success in all circum- teaching and learning” (p. 17). stances. (p. 5) So what are these well-established principles Adamson (2004) also critiques language teach- that teachers should apply in the post-methods ing methods and suggests that attention now be era? One of the early concrete proposals comes turned “to the teacher and the learner, and the from Kumaravadivelu (1994), who offers a frame- ways in which they can operate effectively in their work consisting of the 10 following macro strate- educational context, instead of offering general- gies, which I summarize briefly: ized, pre-packaged solutions in the shape of teach- 1. Maximize learning opportunities. The teacher’s ing materials and strategies” (p. 619). job is not to transmit knowledge but to create and manage as many learning opportunities as possible. The post-methods era 2. Facilitate negotiated interaction. Learners should Building on the professional consensus that no initiate classroom talk (not just respond to the method could claim supremacy, Prabhu (1990) asks teacher’s prompts) by asking for clarification, why there is no best method. He suggests that there by confirming, by reacting, and so on, as part of are three possible explanations: (1) different meth- teacher-student and student-student interaction. ods are best for different teaching/learning circum- 3. Minimize perceptual mismatches. Reduce or avoid stances; (2) all methods have some truth or validity; mismatches between what the teacher and and (3) the whole notion of what is a good or a bad the learner believe is being taught or should method is irrelevant. Prabhu argues for the third be taught as well as how learner performance possibility and concludes that we need to rethink should be evaluated. what is “best” such that classroom teachers and 4. Activate intuitive heuristics. Teachers should applied linguists can develop shared pedagogical provide enough data for learners to infer perceptions of what real-world classroom teaching is. underlying grammatical rules, since it is impos- Coming from the perspective of critical sible to explicitly teach all rules of the L2. theory (Foucault, 1980), Pennycook (1989) also 5. Foster language awareness. Teachers should get challenges the concept of method: learners to attend to and learn the formal properties of the L2 and then to compare and Method is a prescriptive concept that articu- contrast these formal properties with those of lates a positivist, progressivist and patriar- the L1. chal understanding of teaching and plays 6. Contextualize linguistic input. Meaningful an important role in maintaining inequities discourse-based activities are needed to help between, on the one hand, predominantly learners see the interaction of grammar, lexi- male academics and, on the other, female con, and pragmatics in natural language use. teachers and language classrooms on the 7. Integrate language skills. The separation of listen- international power periphery. (p. 589) ing, reading, speaking, and writing is artificial. Many applied linguists, while not holding As in the real world, learners should integrate as radical a view as that of Pennycook, nonethe- skills: conversation (listening and speaking), less agree that we are in a post-methods era. note-taking (listening and writing), self-study Beyond what Strevens, Prabhu, and Pennycook (reading and writing), and so on.

10 Unit I 8. Promote learner autonomy. Teachers should help settings. Adamson (2004), for example, reviews learners to learn on their own by raising Kumaravadivelu’s 10 macro strategies and notes awareness of effective learning strategies and that this framework might not be applicable where providing problems and tasks that encourage the syllabus and teaching materials are fixed and learners to use strategies such as planning and external examinations are prescribed. In such self-monitoring. cases, he feels that teachers may not have sufficient 9. Raise cultural consciousness. Teachers should autonomy to implement a post-methods approach. allow learners to become sources of cultural He adds that teachers may also lack access to the information so that knowledge about the professional knowledge that will allow them to culture of the L2 and of other cultures (espe- develop an approach truly responsive to their cially those represented by the students) learners and their context. becomes part of classroom communication. 10. Ensure social relevance: Acknowledge that language learning has social, political, eco- nomic, and educational dimensions that shape Classroom Applications the motivation to learn the L2, determine the Recall the TESOL-program applicant described in uses to which the L2 will be put, and define the the opening Experience section, who wanted to skills and proficiency level needed in the L2. discover or develop the one best method to the consternation of the professors on the graduate Based on these 10 guiding macrostrategies, admissions committee. What is the solution for deal- Kumaravadivelu (1994) suggests that teachers ing with this prospective ESL/EFL teacher? The best should have the independence to design situation- way for him or her to learn to make wise decisions specific micro strategies, or materials and proce- is to gain knowledge about the various approaches, dures, to achieve their desired learning objectives. methods, and frameworks currently available and to (See Brinton, this volume, for specific instruc- identify practices that may prove successful with the tional strategies.) learners in the context in which he or she is, or will Kumaravadivelu (2001, 2006) further elabo- be, teaching (Larsen-Freeman & Anderson, 2011). rates on his 1994 paper, acknowledging that this This chapter’s overview just scratches the surface. post-methods era is a transitional period and that Further information is available in the remainder post-method pedagogy is a work in progress. He of this volume and in many other books, in journal argues that language teachers need to become articles, in presentations and workshops at profes- principled pragmatists, shaping their students’ sional conferences, and on the Internet. classroom learning through informed teaching There are at least five things that our appli- and critical reflection. The post-methods teacher cant to the MA TESOL program should learn to is characterized as reflective, autonomous and self- do to make good pragmatic decisions concerning directed (Nunan & Lamb, 1996), and able to elicit the judicious application of an approach, a design, authentic pedagogical interaction (van Lier, 1996). or a method (including teaching materials) and its Ideally, such teachers will engage in research techniques or procedures: to refine their practices. (See also chapters by Murphy and Bailey, this volume.) 1. Assess student needs: Why are they learning The post-methods teacher educator moves English? For what purpose? away from transmitting an established body of knowl- 2. Examine the instructional constraints: time edge to prospective teachers and, instead, takes into (hours per week, days per week, and weeks per account their beliefs, voices, and visions to develop term), class size (nature of enrollment), mate- their critical thinking skills. The goal is to help them rials (set syllabus and text, or completely open develop their own effective pedagogies that will cre- to teacher?), and physical factors (classroom ate meaningful collaboration among learners, teach- size, available audiovisual and technological ers, and teacher educators (Kumaravadivelu, 2001). support). Then decide what and how much Not all applied linguists are fully convinced can reasonably be taught and how. that the idealistic proposals that have emerged 3. Determine the attitudes, learning styles, and to date in the post-methods era will work in all cultural backgrounds of individual students

Chapter 1 11 to the extent that this is possible, and develop and pronunciation, as well as the language skills activities and materials consistent with the (listening, speaking, reading, and writing). findings. Canagarajah (2006) suggests that research 4. Identify the discourse genres, speech activities, into the following six areas could result in new and text types that the students need to learn methodological paradigms: so that they can be incorporated into materials 1. Motivation: How does the nature and extent and learning activities. of the learner’s motivation affect language 5. Determine how the students’ language learning learning? (See Dörnyei, this volume.) will be assessed, and incorporate learning activ- 2. Learner variability: How can teachers best ities that simulate assessment practices into accommodate students with different strengths classroom instruction. and weaknesses in the same class? In the course of doing all these, the appli- 3. Discourse analysis: How does the discourse of cant (having completed his or her training) will the classroom and of the materials used by be in a position to select the most useful tech- the teacher and generated by the learners niques and procedures and to design a pro- contribute to language learning? (See Celce- ductive course of study by drawing on existing Murcia & Olshtain, this volume.) research findings and assessing the suitability of 4. Corpus-based research: To what extent can corpus- available approaches, syllabus/curriculum types, based data be used by teachers and learners to and teaching materials. Clifford Prator, a profes- enhance the learning process? (See McCarthy sor and former colleague of mine, summed up & O’Keeffe, this volume.) the professional ESL/EFL teacher’s responsibility 5. Cognition: How do the learners’ cognitive aptly (personal communication): styles and cognitive strategies influence their language learning and language use? (See Adapt; don’t adopt. Purpura, this volume.) Our MA program applicant will certainly be in a 6. Social participation: To what extent can group better position upon graduation to follow Prator’s work, pair work, Cooperative Learning, and advice if he or she is familiar with the history and well-structured tasks enhance student partici- the state of the art of our profession as well as with pation and learning? (See chapters by Brinton all the options available to the teacher and his or and by Nunan, this volume.) her learners. To this list, we add a seventh area—new technolo- gies—since we are only beginning to understand Future Trends how wide access to and use of the Internet and social media can advance language pedagogy and Finding ways to integrate all that we now know accelerate language learning. (See Sokolik, this is the challenge for current and future language volume.) teachers and for the profession at large. We must build on our past and present knowledge of what works to refine and improve existing language Conclusion teaching practices and, it is hoped, develop other practices that will be even better and more encom- This is an exciting time to be teaching English passing. We cannot be satisfied with the current, in- as a second or foreign language. The spread of progress state of affairs but must seek out new ways English around the world has created a grow- to provide learners with the most effective and ing need for qualified teachers—native and non- efficient language learning experiences possible, native speakers. In many countries, children are taking into account the learners’ goals, interests, starting to learn English at an ever-younger age. and learning contexts. Language teachers must There is more need than ever for teachers who also become familiar with the research in the field can deal with English in the workplace. The ever- of instructed second language acquisition. (See growing use of English as a lingua franca and the Ellis, this volume.) This research offers insights into proliferation of varieties of English require careful the teaching and learning of grammar, vocabulary, linguistic description and appropriate pedagogies.

12 Unit I Continual advances in digital technology are 4. What has been the role of the native language opening new channels for teaching and learning. and the target language in the various Language teachers must be ready to continually approaches and methods? adapt to new and changing circumstances since 5. Do you agree or disagree that we are currently there is no fixed body of knowledge that one can in a post-methods era? Explain. master and say, “Now I know everything!”

Summary Suggested Activities

➤ Many different approaches and methods for 1. Select an integrated-skills ESL/EFL text that L2 instruction have been proposed and devel- you have used or expect to use. Examine oped over the centuries. its contents to determine which approach it ➤ New approaches and methods are often devel- seems to follow most closely. Support your oped in direct response to perceived problems decision with examples. Discuss any mixing of with or inadequacies in an existing popular approaches that you observe. approach or method and/or to the learning 2. Observe an ESL or EFL class, and make a list of theory prevalent at that time. all the procedures that the teacher uses. Based ➤ There has never been and will never be one on these observations, hypothesize the main approach or method that works best in all features of the approach and design that the possible teaching/learning contexts. procedures imply. ➤ Ideally, L2 teachers will develop (with full 3. Demonstration of teaching method: In groups, knowledge of available options and in use the Internet and other available sources collaboration with their students) the goals, to research a teaching method/approach methods, materials, and activities that work from the list that follows. Then plan a lesson best in their particular contexts. illustrating the key features of this method. Be ➤ Some applied linguists claim that we are in a prepared to: (a) present a brief demonstration transitional post-methods era in which teach- of the method to your classmates; and ers have opportunities to creatively apply new (b) explain its key features using the Richards findings and fine-tune effective past prac- and Rodgers framework. Suggested topics: tices to develop, reflect on, and continuously improve their classroom teaching. •• Audiolingual approach •• Natural Approach Discussion Questions •• Task-based learning •• Content-based instruction •• Total Physical Response •• Silent Way 1. Which of the approaches discussed in the •• Cooperative Learning •• Oral/situational approach chapter have you personally experienced as •• Community Language •• Direct method (Berlitz a language learner? What were your impres- Learning method) sions, and what is your assessment of the effec- tiveness of the approach(es)? •• Project work •• Suggestopedia 2. What is the position regarding the teaching of: (a) pronunciation; (b) grammar; and (c) vocabulary in the many approaches discussed in this chapter? Has there been a swinging of Further Reading the pendulum with respect to the teaching of Howatt, A. P. R. (with Widdowson, H. G.). (2004). these areas? Why or why not? A history of English language teaching (2nd ed.). 3. What changes have occurred regarding the rel- Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ative emphasis on spoken language or written language in the various approaches discussed This book covers the teaching of English from in this chapter? Why? 1400 to the present day.

Chapter 1 13 Kelly, L. G. (1969). Twenty-five centuries of language Endnotes teaching. New York, NY: Newbury House. 1 Versions of the first part of this chapter were published in Prator with Celce-Murcia (1979) and Celce-Murcia (2001). This expanded This volume goes back to the Greeks and Romans and updated version also draws on Madsen (1979) and Brinton and covers the teaching of all foreign languages (2011a). 2 Examples of such written texts are the Gutenberg Bible in German (not just English). and the Chanson de Rolande in French. 3 The term direct method is more widely used than direct approach; however, Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011) the former is a misnomer, since this is really an approach, not a method, if we follow Anthony’s (1963) terminology or that of Techniques and principles in language teaching Richards and Rodgers (2001). (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 4 Firthian linguistics is best codified in the work of Firth’s best-known student, M. A. K. Halliday (1973), who refers to his approach This is a good source for a more detailed look at to language analysis as systemic-functional grammar. Halliday’s approach is very different from Chomsky’s generative grammar, many of the teaching methods mentioned in this a highly abstract extension of structuralism and an approach chapter. to language that paid explicit attention to the description of linguistic features (Chomsky, 1965). In addition to form and meaning, Halliday also takes social context into account in his Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches theory and description. Halliday’s system extends beyond the and methods in language teaching: A description and sentence level, whereas Chomsky’s does not. Thus many applied analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge linguists find Halliday’s framework better for their purposes than Chomsky’s. University Press. 5 The term humanistic has two meanings. One refers to the humanities (i.e., literature, history, and philosophy). The other refers to This text presents a thorough description and that branch of psychology concerned with the role of the socio- affective domain in human behavior. It is the latter sense that I analysis of past and current second language am referring to here. However, see Stevick (1990) for an even teaching approaches. broader perspective on humanism in language teaching.

14 Unit I