Uptown

South End

New Bern

Scaleybark WoodlawnSharon & I-485 Tyvola Transit Station Area Plan ADOPTED BY MAY 26, 2009 Archdale

Arrowood

Sharon Road West

2009 I-485/South Boulevard MARVIN COLLINS OUTSTANDING PLANNING AWARD south corridor station area plans SPECIAL THEME CATEGORY Sustainable Community Planning Table of Contents Executive Summary iii

Volume I: Concept Plan 1 Study Area Context 3 Planning Process 3 Plan Boundaries 3 Opportunities and Constraints 4 Vision 6 Goals 6 Land Use and Community Design 9 Transit Station Area 9 General Corridor Area 11 Transportation and Streetscape 15 Transportation/Street Design Recommendations 15 Streetscape Standards 19 Street Cross-sections 19 Boulevard 20 Avenue - Four-Lane Divided 21 Avenue - Two-Lane Undivided 22 Avenue - Two-Lane Divided 23 Office/Commercial Street - Wide 24 Local Residential Street - Wide 25 Infrastructure and Public Facilities 26 Public Facility/Infrastructure Recommendations 26 Park and Greenway Recommendations 26 Environment 27 Environmental Recommendations 27

Volume 2: Implementation Plan 29 Public Sector Responsibilities 31 Private Sector Responsibilities 31 Corrective Rezonings 31 Implementation Strategies 32

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan i Appendix 35 Existing Conditions 37 Demographics 37 Environment 38 Land Use and Urban Design 39 Transportation 48 Infrastructure /Public Facilities 55

List of Maps Map 1: Study Area within Corridor Context 2 Map 2: Concept Plan 7 Map 3: Recommended Future Land Use 8 Map 4: Future Transportation Network 17 Map 5: Streetscape Cross Section Key 18

Map 6: Corrective Rezonings 30

Rendering of the I-485/South Boulevard Station, showing Sterling Elementary School and playground on the garage rooftop.

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan ii Executive Summary iii Purpose lels the light rail line, its relatively poor pedestrian environment, and the disconnected street network. It The Sharon Road West and I-485/South Boulevard is home to a number of large industrial operations Transit Stations are the fourteenth and fifteenth sta- and automobile-oriented retail businesses. While not tions heading south from Center City along the South transit-supportive in nature, such uses serve employ- Corridor Light Rail Transit (LRT) line, also known as ment and economic functions within the City, and the . may remain in place for many years to come. The Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan is the sixth of a series of plans for areas around the stations Vision south of South End. The Introduction to the South Corridor Station Area Plans lays the foundation for the The desired future for the plan area is highlighted in station area plans. This plan builds on that document. the following vision statement: It analyzes current conditions in the area around the station, detailed in the Appendix. The Sharon and I-485 plan area is home to existing industrial and commercial operations important to The Concept Plan makes recommendations to bring the City’s employment and economic needs, and con- the right mix of development to complement the tinuing operations will be supported. Incrementally transit investment, and to optimize the land use and over time, the area is expected to transition to become infrastructure within the wider surrounding area to part of the series of vibrant, high density transit vil- support its continued viability. The Concept Plan is lages along the South Corridor. Within its boundar- the only section of this document to be adopted by ies, there will be two distinct areas: City Council. • Transit Station Area: The core of the plan area will transform over time to a pedestrian- Study Area oriented district with higher density, transit- supportive uses. The plan focuses on the area within approximately General Corridor Area: 1/2 mile of the two transit stations. The actual sta- • The areas generally tions are visible just west of South Boulevard. Sharon beyond the ½ mile walk distance will include Station is accessible by vehicles from Crump Road and a range of uses appropriate for a Growth by pedestrians via a pedestrian bridge. I-485 Station Corridor. Existing commercial, industrial, has vehicular and pedestrian connections to South warehouse and distribution, office, and insti- Boulevard under the light rail line. However, the plan tutional uses will remain. Over time, those area covers a much larger area, encompassing South uses closest to the transit station may rede- Boulevard, Sharon Lakes Road, Sharon Road West, velop with higher density, mixed uses typically China Grove Church Road and East Westinghouse associated with transit. Existing multi-family Boulevard. It is entirely within a Growth Corridor, areas may remain or redevelop at slightly as envisioned by the City’s Centers, Corridors and higher densities. The primarily single-family Wedges growth framework, although it does include neighborhoods will be preserved and pro- the Sterling, Pine Valley, and Sharonbrook neighbor- tected from incompatible uses. hoods. Land Use and Community Design Opportunities & Constraints The plan contains a number of recommendations related to Land Use and Community Design within Through examination of existing conditions in the each of the two areas noted in the vision statement. Sharon & I-485 plan area (see Appendix), oppor- The recommendations, shown on Map 3, include: tunities to build upon and constraints to overcome were identified. The station locations are highly Transit Station Area visible from South Boulevard, and easily accessible by vehicle, but are more difficult for pedestrians. The • Support continuing use of major industrial area around the stations has some underutilized prop- operations located in close proximity to the erties in large parcels. The surrounding area has stable Sharon Station, until such time as the prop- neighborhoods and diverse housing stock. The plan erty owners are ready for redevelopment to area is challenged by the freight rail line that paral- transit supportive uses. Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iv • Promote a mix of transit supportive land uses • Enhance pedestrian and bicycle crossings at in the Transit Station Area, generally within key locations; site new development to allow 1/2 mile of the stations; support expansion of for future bicycle lanes on South Boulevard. CATS Park & Ride capacity, including more intense mixed use development in the future. • Install pedestrian lighting in key locations. Allow for existing businesses and industrial operations to remain in place until property Streetscape Cross-Sections owners are ready for redevelopment. This section recommends future cross sections for • Provide active, ground floor, non-residential streets, and identifies building setbacks and streetscape uses such as retail or office, at key locations. standards based on the ultimate curbline location. • Create urban parks and plazas near stations. These standards supplement requirements in TOD and other urban zoning districts. Based on the City’s • Encourage incremental intensification of the Urban Street Design Guidelines, they will be met by Carolina Pavilion Shopping Center with transit- developers who undertake new development or major supportive uses. renovation in the plan area. Map 5 shows the location • Ensure that development adjacent to single for each type. The following street types are recom- family neighborhoods provides good transition. mended for the plan area: General Corridor Area • Boulevard • Maintain a mixture of office, commercial, • Avenue: 4-lane divided, 2-lane undivided, warehouse, and industrial uses in the vicin- and 2-lane divided ity of Hebron Street and Westinghouse • Main Street Boulevard. • Office/Commercial Street- wide • Maintain the predominantly single-family portions of Pine Valley, Sharonbrook, and • Local Residential Street- wide Sterling neighborhoods. Infrastructure and Environment • Support continued moderate density residen- tial use off of Sharon Road West and Sharon The core of the plan area includes present and former Lakes Road under specific criteria. commercial and industrial development, expected • Maintain the moderate density residen- to redevelop over a period of time. Its water and tial character in the portions of the Sterling sewer system may require expansion for more intense neighborhood surrounding the Sterling new uses. In addition, the plan recommendations Elementary School, with specific criteria for include: increased density in some areas closest to the I-485 Station. • Encourage small urban open spaces in Transit Station Area. • Support moderate density residential use of property on Westinghouse Road west of the • Make street trees a feature of all streets, and Sterling neighborhood under specific criteria. reduce impervious surfaces. • Provide for a mix of retail and office land • Design new buildings to reduce stormwater uses along South Boulevard north of the runoff and improve water quality; protect and station area, and along part of Westinghouse enhance watersheds. Boulevard. • Encourage burying of overhead utility lines. Transportation and Streetscape Implementation Plan Transportation recommendations address proposed The Implementation Plan recommends projects new streets and enhancements to existing streets to to implement the policy recommendations of the make them more pedestrian and bicycle friendly. The Concept Plan. Because the Implementation Plan is recommendations, shown on Map 4, include: not adopted by elected officials, it is a guide, not a commitment. The Implementation Plan recommends • Provide new street connections at key loca- a number of sidewalk improvement and street con- tions; enhance existing street network. nection projects, as well as corrective rezonings as • Widen sidewalk system along area thorough- shown on Map 6. fares, improve system in Transit Station Area. Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Uptown

South End

New Bern

Scaleybark

Volume 1: Woodlawn 1 Concept Plan Tyvola Archdale

Arrowood

Sharon Road West

I-485/South Boulevard Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan 2 Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan Map 1: Study Area and South Corridor Boundaries

W OLD HEBRON RD A T PENINSULA LN E TESSAVA R

C

CT R

E

ROCKLEDGE DR S

T

HILL RD

MAPLERIDGE DR STARVALLEY DR

SWEDEN RD MAPLE HEBRON ST WEST SUGAR

CPCC PL R D Southwest STOCKHOLM CT RIDGEBROOK DR

MAPLE

PL LONG VALLEY DR Campus

WINDSONG DR

WISTER PL H

BARK MEAD DR E

BR SHERBOURNE DR O THORNCLIFF DR N ENGLAND ST

C O S M HEBRON ST EAST H M

E A GARTH WOOD RD R DENMARK RD C R E O DR N

NATIONS FORD RD

Little LA OLD NATIONS OLDFORD NATIONS RD KES Sugar RD WITTSTOCK DR Creek Greenway

COVEY CHASE DR

QUAIL HILL RD

US HWY 521 MUSTANG LN

MAGGIE LN HOPETON RD T SHARON RD WEST

REGENT PARK LN

OBERBECK LN SHARON BROOK DR Sharonbrook

Neighborhood GRUENEWALD LN PEWSBURY RD

KNIGHTS BRIDGE RD KIRCHENBAUM DR WAYBRIDGE

CRUMP RD LN CRAFTERS LN CRESSIDA DR

SHARON BROOK DR

BERGEN CT JENA CT

OLD NATIONS FORD RD

E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD LEIPZIG DR STERLING LN LODGEPOLE HEIDLEBURG LN PL

D SPRUCE PINE PL LONGLEAF DR LYTHAM DR R TIMBERLINE AILEEN CIR RD

Pine Valley BIG

CONE

RCH PL

U

Neighborhood YANDLE LN N CH LO L Sterling BLOLLY LONGLEAF DR BREMER

GREYLEAF PL CT

TURNBERRY LN

Neighborhood

E SOUTH BLVD

Sterling Carolina Pavilion OV Elementary Shopping Center ERVIN LN HEDDER

OLDENBURGCT DR

GR

T EMSTEAD

A A CT

ERVIN LN LANDSBURG LN HIN

HANOVER GLEN DR

C GLISSON CT DENDY LN Little HANOVER RIDGE CT

AVONDALE Sugar AVE

HANOVER HOLLOW DR PACKARD ST Creek HANOVER WOODS PL BIRNEN DR MYRTLE AVE Greenway

BRANSON CT

BRANDEMERE CT

PINEVILLE RD (CLOSED) HANOVER SOUTH TL I-485 BALMORAL CIR VERDUN DR PARK CROSSING DR

PENSHURST TRACE

BRAEMAR TL

WARWICK CIR

NICKELBY CT

LOGAN CT PALLISERS TR Southland TRESANTON DR

Industrial Park FOXFALL DR

KILMORY TR

CHATHAM OAKS TR

QUEENS INDUSTRIAL DR OLD PINEVILLE RD OAK CT

KENLAUREN TR CADILLAC ST

HADLEIGH PL

RODNEY ST CADILLAC ST N

South Corridor Boundary

W E

Study Area Boundary

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p S e than ma 0 750 1,500 Produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department. feet Date: September 19, 2008

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan

Study Area Context 3 The Sharon Road West and I-485/South Boulevard More detailed information on the background, Transit Stations are the fourteenth and fifteenth sta- purpose and process for developing this, and other, tions heading south from Center City along the South station area plans can be found in the companion Corridor Light Rail Transit (LRT) line, also known as document, Introduction to the South Corridor Station the LYNX Blue Line. They are the last two stations on Area Plans. the line. This document is the sixth of a series of plans for Plan Boundaries the station areas extending south from South End. The Sharon & I-485 Transit Stations are located on The plan is divided into the Concept Plan, the the South Corridor light rail line running parallel to Implementation Plan, and an Appendix containing a South Boulevard. A Transit Station Area is defined thorough review of existing conditions. The Concept as the property generally within a ½ mile walk dis- Plan is the only section of the plan adopted by City tance of a transit station, about a ten-minute walk. Council. The Concept Plan: While the Transit Station Area is the primary focus of this plan, for contextual purposes, the boundaries of • Defines the growth and development vision Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan for the area surrounding the Sharon Road the extend West and I-485/South Boulevard LRT stations beyond the ½ mile distance, including residential, (hereafter referred to as Sharon & I-485); employment, institutional and industrial areas. • Makes recommendations for land use, trans- As shown on Map 1, the plan area is bisected by the portation, urban design, and other develop- light rail line and the Norfolk Southern freight rail ment-related topics; line. Major roads include South Boulevard, Sharon Lakes Road, Sharon Road West, China Grove Church • Updates the Centers, Corridors and Wedges Road and East Westinghouse Boulevard. The entire boundaries for the plan area from those ini- plan area except for the flood plain along the east tially outlined in the Transportation Action Plan boundary falls in the South Growth Corridor as ; and defined by the Centers, Corridors and Wedges Growth • Serves as the official streetscape plan for the Framework. Plan boundaries generally follow existing combined station area once the Concept Plan zoning and block configurations. is adopted. The two stations within the plan area function differ- ently. Sharon Station serves as a Community Station Planning Process as defined in the Introduction to the South Corridor Station Area Plans. Typically, Community Stations are Initial planning for the Sharon & I-485 plan area not transit oriented, but have the potential to trans- began in conjunction with planning for the South form into a transit-oriented district over time. They Corridor LRT line. A community planning and urban serve multiple destinations within a three-mile radius, design consulting firm and an interdepartmental staff with strong reliance on bus connections and park- team, led by Planning Department staff, held public and-ride facilities. This station has a 190-space lot, meetings to gather initial input from area residents connected to South Boulevard by Crump Road. and property owners. The staff team has developed plan recommendations based on citizen input, the As the terminus station for the LYNX Blue Line, I-485 area context, and guidance from a number of City Station functions as a Regional Station. Regional Council adopted policies. Stations generally serve an area of five miles or more, augmented by bus connections and park-and-ride Prior to adoption of the plan, staff will hold addi- facilities. I-485 Station includes a parking deck tional public meetings with area residents and prop- with 1,100 spaces accessible from South Boulevard, erty owners to present the plan recommendations and as well as additional surface overflow lots. Plans are to receive feedback. The next step of the process will under consideration for additional spaces, as funding be presentation to the Planning Committee of the becomes available. A bus transfer area is adjacent to Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission who the parking deck. A landscaped sidewalk links the will hear citizen comments and make a recommenda- Sterling neighborhood to the station platform. tion to the Charlotte City Council. The City Council will also hear citizen comments and make a final deci- sion concerning adoption of the plan. Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan STUDY AREA CONTEXT 4

Sharon Road West Station has a bridge crossing the light rail The I-485/South Boulevard Station sits on a bridge over the and freight rail lines to South Boulevard. street entrance to the park and ride garage.

a broad ridership. From both the Sharon and Opportunities and Constraints I-485 stations, East Westinghouse Boulevard provides access to . Review of existing conditions reveals a number of opportunities and constraints to transforming the • Improved Transportation Environment: core of the plan area into a transit supportive environ- As a part of the Light Rail construction ment. Success will depend upon effectively dealing project and the South Corridor Infrastructure with the constraints and capitalizing on the opportu- Program (SCIP), a number of physical and nities described below. visual improvements to the streetscape were made around both stations, including cross- For a complete discussion of existing conditions, see walks and pedestrian scale lighting. These the Appendix of this document. improvements have made the area somewhat safer and more attractive. As development occurs, additional transportation improve- Opportunities ments should be provided. • Station Facilities and Visibility: Both sta- • Underutilized Assembled Land: There are a tions include highly visible and attractive number of large parcels throughout the plan facilities. Sharon Station has a 190-space area under single ownership which could be surface parking lot accessible from Crump redeveloped in the future for higher density Road with good vehicular accessibility. Bus uses. This includes some vacant and under- feeder routes serve the station. The pedes- utilized sites, but also includes numerous trian bridge at the Sharon Station across the properties in retail and business use that may Norfolk Southern railroad line provides vis- redevelop in the longer term. ibility and access as a catalyst for redevelop- • Long-term Redevelopment Opportunities: ment of properties east of South Boulevard. The 2003 market study by Charles Lesser & The I-485 station includes a 1,100-space Company found that the northern portion of parking deck, with amenities including walk- the plan area represents a longer-term devel- ways, benches, and landscaping. Bus feeder opment opportunity than stations closer to routes serve this station also. The top level of downtown. Around Sharon Station, near the parking deck provides a playground for term opportunities are for new “horizontal” the Sterling Elementary school. local-serving office and multi-family develop- • Major Interstate Access: Both stations ment. In the I-485 Station area, the Carolina have the advantage of access to major inter- Pavilion parking lot presents opportunities state highways. The terminal station, I-485, for gradual transit-oriented commercial and offers convenient access to I-485 (less than ½ residential development that might include mile away), making the station attractive to structured parking. Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan STUDY AREA CONTEXT 5 • Housing Diversity: The plan area has con- • Large Industrial Areas: The vast expanse of siderable diversity in its housing stock. This the Lance plant, Caraustar facilities and other includes single-family neighborhoods, town- industrial uses are not typically transit sup- houses, and multi-family apartments. These portive uses. Nonetheless, they provide strong neighborhoods offer a base of riders to build employment and economic base for the City, upon. Protection and enhancement of these and are anticipated to remain in place for neighborhoods will be a priority in this plan. the indefinite future. However, there is little • Institutional Uses: Schools in the plan area physical or visual connection between Sharon present the opportunity to capture student and Station and these employment areas. faculty ridership. At Sharon Station, students • Hostile Pedestrian Environment: Much of and faculty can walk to the Kennedy Charter the streetscape in the study area is uninvit- Public School; students, faculty, and staff at ing to pedestrians. With intermittent narrow the CPCC Campus on Hebron Street could sidewalks, limited planting strips, absent mid- use Sharon Station if shuttle service were pro- block crossings, few street trees, no on-street vided. Sterling Elementary School faculty and parking, multiple curb cuts, and poor light- staff are potential riders at the I-485 station. ing, the streets are more oriented to vehicular travelers than to bicyclists or pedestrians. Constraints • Need for Open Space: Little Sugar Creek • Railroad Line: The Norfolk Southern freight Greenway runs along the eastern boundary railroad line bisects the plan area and paral- of the plan area. A park on Westinghouse lels the LYNX light rail line the entire length Boulevard near the I-485 crossing is projected of the plan area. With the freight line imme- for the west edge of the plan area, but is not diately adjacent to South Boulevard on the funded. Additional open space and landscap- northern end, there is little opportunity for ing, consistent with an urban environment, is active use on that street frontage. desirable in the station area. Limited Tree Canopy and Landscaping: • Disconnected Street Network: The plan area • has a largely disconnected and sparse street Currently, the core of the station area has few network. All long-distance north-south trav- trees and minimal landscaping. As the land elers must use South Boulevard. Other than around the transit stations redevelop, the the street grid at Hebron and England Streets quality of the built environment, especially in and Denmark and Sweden Roads, east-west the core of the plan area, could be improved traffic must funnel through Westinghouse by the addition of trees and landscaping. Boulevard, onto South Boulevard, and on to Sharon Road West. Even vehicular trips within the plan area are restricted to these routes. Better connections and an extensive street network leading into and through the station areas will be needed in order to support the high intensity transit oriented development anticipated. • Automobile-oriented strip development: At present, the development character in both station areas is largely automobile oriented, including auto dealerships, fast food restau- rants and gas stations along South Boulevard. While such uses represent employment opportunities, they do not generate the higher density transit-oriented development preferred in proximity to transit stations. Carolina Pavilion, as well as many of the other retail uses that line South Boulevard near the I-485 station are relatively new, and have stable occupancy, making redevelopment in Across South Boulevard from the I-485/South Boulevard the short to medium-term unlikely. Station is Carolina Pavilion, a big box shopping center.

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan STUDY AREA CONTEXT 6 Vision Goals The Sharon and I-485 plan area is home to existing To achieve this vision, the following goals have been industrial and commercial operations important to identified for the Sharon & I-485 plan area. The goals the City’s employment and economic needs, and con- draw on adopted, or in-progress, City policies, many tinuing operations will be supported. Incrementally of which were discussed in the Introduction to the over time, the area is expected to transition to become South Corridor Transit Station Area Plans. part of the series of vibrant, high density transit vil- lages along the South Corridor. Within its boundar- 1. Land Use: Promote higher density uses that would ies, there will be two distinct areas: be best served by the high capacity transportation facilities in the Corridor, while protecting the • Transit Station Area: The core of the plan fabric of the existing residential neighborhoods. area, defined generally as the ½ mile walk dis- tance from either station, will transform over 2. Community Design: Building on the synergy of time to a pedestrian-oriented district with existing public infrastructure investments, estab- higher density, transit-supportive uses. lish a high quality pedestrian-oriented environ- • General Corridor Area: The areas generally ment with attractive streetscapes. At the same beyond the ½ mile walk distance will include time, respect the character of existing and future a range of uses appropriate for a Growth residential areas. Corridor. Existing commercial, industrial, Transportation: warehouse and distribution, office, and insti- 3. Enhance the area’s transporta- tutional uses will remain. Over time, those tion system by providing new street connections uses closest to the transit station may rede- and improving the pedestrian and bicycle system. velop with higher density, mixed uses typically Infrastructure/ Public Facilities: associated with transit. Existing multi-family 4. Provide the areas may remain or redevelop at slightly infrastructure and public facilities needed to higher densities. The primarily single-family support development in the Growth Corridor. neighborhoods will be preserved and pro- 5. Environment: Improve the quality of the natural tected from incompatible uses. environment by providing access to the Little Unlike the other transit station areas, the Sharon & Sugar Creek Greenway, enhancing the tree canopy, I-485 plan area does not include Wedge Neighborhood improving water quality from stormwater run-off, Areas. However, neighborhoods within the General and creating open space for the station areas. Corridor will incorporate protection measures similar to Wedge neighborhoods. The vision and goals serve as the basis for the recom- mendations in the chapters that follow. Map 2 illustrates the development concept for the Sharon & I-485 plan area.

The I-485 Station is connected by a bridge to a park and ride New residential development directly abutting the LYNX lot, topped by a playground serving the adjoining elementary line at New Bern station is a model for future development. school. Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan STUDY AREA CONTEXT 77 Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan Map 2: Concept Plan

Sweden Rd Corridor Hebron St Commercial Corridor Zone church Sharon L a k

LRT Line and Multi-Use Trail e

s

Moderate R Density d Industrial Residential South Bv

Transit Sharon Station Station T Area school Sharon Rd W est Corridor Commercial Corridor Zone Transit Station Area Westinghouse Bv park Neighborhood park Preservation Moderate church Density I-485I-485 Residential Station school T Corridor Neighborhood Zone park I-485

N

W E

S

0 750 1,500 feet

Corridor Zone Transit Oriented Development Neighborhood Preservation Moderate Density Residential

Produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department. Date: December 2008

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan STUDY AREA CONTEXT 8 Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan Map 3: Recommended Future Land Use Proposed Street Connections*

W OLD HEBRON RD A T 1/4 Mile Walking Distance PENINSULA LN E TESSAVA R

C

CT R

E

Corridor ROCKLEDGE DR S

1/2 Mile Walking Distance T

HILL RD

*Note: e location of the proposed streets is

MAPLERIDGE DR conceptual. Alternative locations, consistent STARVALLEY DR

SWEDEN RD MAPLE HEBRON ST WEST SUGAR

with the intent of the proposed network, PL R D will also be considered. STOCKHOLM CT RIDGEBROOK DR

MAPLE

PL LONG VALLEY DR

WINDSONG DR

WISTER PL H

BARK MEAD DR E

BR SHERBOURNE DR O THORNCLIFF DR N ENGLAND ST

C O S M HEBRON ST EAST H M

E A GARTH WOOD RD R DENMARK RD C R E O DR N

NATIONS FORD RD

LA OLD NATIONS OLDFORD NATIONS RD KES RD WITTSTOCK DR

COVEY CHASE DR

QUAIL HILL RD

US HWY 521

MUSTANG LN

MAGGIE LN HOPETON RD T SHARON RD WEST

REGENT PARK LN

OBERBECK LN

SHARON BROOK DR

GRUENEWALD LN

PEWSBURY RD

KNIGHTS BRIDGE RD KIRCHENBAUM DR WAYBRIDGE LN CRAFTERS LN CRESSIDA DR

CRUMP RD SHARON BROOK DR

BERGEN CT JENA CT

OLD NATIONS FORD RD

E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD LEIPZIG DR STERLING LN LODGEPOLE HEIDLEBURG LN PL

D SPRUCE PINE PL LONGLEAF DR LYTHAM DR R TIMBERLINE AILEEN CIR RD

BIG

CONE

RCH PL

U

SOUTH BLVD

YANDLE LN N CH LO L BLOLLY LONGLEAF DR BREMER

GREYLEAF PL CT

TURNBERRY LN

E OV

ERVIN LN HEDDER

OLDENBURGCT DR

GR

T EMSTEAD

A A CT

ERVIN LN LANDSBURG LN HIN

HANOVER GLEN DR

C GLISSON CT DENDY LN HANOVER RIDGE CT

AVONDALE AVE

HANOVER HOLLOW DR PACKARD ST HANOVER WOODS PL BIRNEN DR MYRTLE AVE

BRANSON CT

BRANDEMERE CT

PINEVILLE RD (CLOSED) HANOVER SOUTH TL I-485 BALMORAL CIR VERDUN DR PARK CROSSING DR

PENSHURST TRACE

Proposed Land Use BRAEMAR TL

Residential <= 5 DUA Institutional WARWICK CIR NICKELBY CT Residential <= 8 DUA Office/Retail

LOGAN CT PALLISERS TR Residential <= 17 DUA Open Space TRESANTON DR Office/Industrial- Industrial FOXFALL DR KILMORY TR Warehouse-Distribution Transit Oriented - Mixed CHATHAM OAKS TR

QUEENS INDUSTRIAL DR OLD PINEVILLE RD OAK CT

KENLAUREN TR CADILLAC ST

HADLEIGH PL

RODNEY ST CADILLAC ST

N

W E

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p S e than ma 0 750 1,500 Produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department. feet Date: December 09, 2008

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN 9 Land Use and Community Design

This chapter sets forth land use and community design such time as the property owners are ready for recommendations to achieve the vision and goals for redevelopment. These properties are within a 1/2 the Sharon & I-485 plan area. An overviewSharon of the &mile I-485 walk of the Transit Sharon Station, Stationand as such are Area Plan proposed street network is also included. suitable for mixed transit-supportive land uses consistent with the Transit Station Area Principles This chapter divides the study area into two distinctMap 3:if and Recommended when redevelopment occurs. Future Land Use

districts: W OLD HEBRON RD A T PENINSULA LN E TESSAVA R

C

CT R

E

ROCKLEDGE DR S

T

HILL RD

Transit Station Area, the portion of the •

MAPLERIDGE DR STARVALLEY DR

SWEDEN RD MAPLE HEBRON ST WEST SUGAR

South Growth Corridor that surrounds the PL R D STOCKHOLM CT RIDGEBROOK DR

MAPLE

PL LONG VALLEY DR

Sharon and I-485 light rail stationsWINDSONG DR including

WISTER PL

H

BARK MEAD DR E

BR SHERBOURNE DR O important existing industrial uses; and THORNCLIFF DR N ENGLAND ST

C O S M HEBRON ST EAST H M

E A GARTH WOOD RD R DENMARK RD C R General Corridor Area, E • which includes O DR N

NATIONS FORD RD general corridor commercial, office/industrial

LA OLD NATIONS OLDFORD NATIONS RD KES and moderate density residential land uses of RD WITTSTOCK DR the South Growth Corridor. 11

The land use recommendations are shown on Map COVEY CHASE DR 3. The general location for each recommendation is QUAIL HILL RD noted on the map extracts within each section, using US HWY 521 the item numbers below. The recommendations also 1 MUSTANG LN are cross referenced using the item numbers in the Implementation Section of this plan. 5 MAGGIE LN HOPETON RD 6 T SHARON RD WEST

7 REGENT PARK LN Transit Station Area 1

OBERBECK LN The Transit Station area is located along South 2 SHARON BROOK DR 8 GRUENEWALD LN PEWSBURY Boulevard, in the approximate center of the larger 11 RD plan area. The station area, encompassing both the KNIGHTS BRIDGE RD KIRCHENBAUM DR WAYBRIDGE LN CRAFTERS LN CRESSIDA DR

Sharon and I-485 stations, currently includes a variety CRUMP RD SHARON BROOK DR JENA CT of industrial/ distribution, retail, office, institutional BERGEN CT

OLD NATIONS FORD RD

E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD LEIPZIG DR STERLING LN LODGEPOLE HEIDLEBURG LN and residential uses. The Lance plant, and several PL

SPRUCE PINE PL LONGLEAF DR LYTHAM DR RD

TIMBERLINE AILEEN CIR RD

other large industrial operations, are a major presence

BIG

CONE

PL in the area. It is anticipated that these uses will remain

SOUTH BLVD

YANDLE LN L N CHURCH 8 OB Y L 10 L L OL LONGLEAF DR BREMER

GREYLEAF in place, and continue to grow, over a number of PL CT

TURNBERRY LN

years. The following recommendations are intended

E V

to allow this lower intensity, suburban oriented area O R

ERVIN LN HEDDER

OLDENBURGCT DR

G 3

9 to transform, over time, into a higher-intensity urban T EMSTEAD CT

ERVIN LN LANDSBURG LN HINA HINA district. HANOVER GLEN DR

8C 7 GLISSON CT DENDY LN 4 HANOVER RIDGE CT

AVONDALE AVE

HANOVER HOLLOW DR PACKARD ST HANOVER WOODS PL BIRNEN DR MYRTLE AVE

BRANSON Land Use and Community Design CT BRANDEMERE 11 CT PINEVILLE RD (CLOSED) HANOVER SOUTH TL I-485 BALMORAL CIR VERDUN DR 1. Support continuing use of major industrial PARK CROSSING DR PENSHURST TRACE

BRAEMAR operations located adjoining or in close proxim- TL

WARWICK CIR ity to the Sharon Station. While not transit-ori- NICKELBY CT

LOGAN CT PALLISERS TR ented in nature, these uses serve other important TRESANTON DR employment and economic functions within the FOXFALL DR KILMORY TR

City. These properties should retain their indus- CHATHAM OAKS TR

QUEENS trial zoning to allow them to continue as-of-right INDUSTRIAL DR OLD PINEVILLE RD OAK CT KENLAUREN TR operations and allow for business expansion, until CADILLAC ST HADLEIGH PL

Map 3.1: TransitRODNEY ST StationCADILLAC ST Area Recommendations

N

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan

W E

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p S e than ma LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN 0 750 1,500 Produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department. feet Date: November 06, 2008 10 2. Promote a mix of transit-supportive land uses 3. Encourage capacity expansion of the I-485 (residential, service-oriented retail, civic, office) park-and-ride facility. The park and ride garage within the Transit Station Area. This will occur at I-485 Station is generally at capacity by early primarily through new development over a period morning. Over the long term the garage should of time. The area desired for future transit-oriented be expanded. The expansion might be in conjunc- development lies generally within a 1/2 mile walk tion with redevelopment of other property, inte- distance of the transit stations and includes land grating a mix of transit-supportive uses. If so, it currently in use as industrial/distribution facili- should include active ground floor uses that wrap ties, commercial development, and strip shopping the parking to create an active streetscape. In the centers. short term, additional temporary surface parking spaces in proximity to the station are being con- • For new development within the Transit sidered. Station Area, ensure that uses, intensity, site and facade design, and transportation ele- 4. Encourage an intensification of the Carolina ments are consistent with the Transit Station Pavilion Shopping Center with an integrated mix Area Principles outlined in the Introduction to of transit-supportive land uses (residential, retail, South Corridor Station Area Plans. civic, and office). Over time and in an incremental manner, this shopping center could be transformed • Design new development to support pedes- into a vibrant, mixed use development, possibly trian activity, with buildings brought close to including a strong residential component. Future the sidewalk and parking to the rear. growth and development of this site should be con- • In addition to the properties within the sistent with the Transit Station Area Principles out- Transit Station Area designated for continu- lined in the Introduction to South Corridor Station ing industrial use, a number of other proper- Area Plans. ties in the Transit Station Area are occupied by ongoing businesses and industrial operations. 5. Encourage redevelopment of the CATS park- While not transit-oriented in nature, it is rec- and-ride surface parking lot at Sharon Station, ognized that these uses serve other important possibly in conjunction with redevelopment of employment and economic functions within other adjoining property, to integrate a mix of the City. These properties should retain their transit-supportive land uses (residential, retail, commercial or industrial zoning to allow them civic, office, as well as the needed parking.) to continue as-of-right operations and allow Development should include active ground floor for business expansion, until such time as the uses that wrap a parking facility to create an active property owners are ready for redevelopment. streetscape. The current surface lot is filled by early morning. Provision of additional park-and- ride spaces is important at this location. 6. Provide active ground floor non-residential uses, such as retail or office, in the area imme- diately surrounding the Sharon Station: along all existing and proposed streets within 500 feet of the transit station. To be most accessible to transit users, design these ground floor uses to include clear glass windows and doors, as well as entrances that front on and connect to the sidewalk. 7. Provide open space and/or pedestrian ameni- ties near both transit stations. Open space should be incorporated into any future park-and-ride redevelopment. Public property along South Boulevard at the edge of the Norfolk Southern rail line should be landscaped with low-maintenance native plant materials and should be used for a The park-and-ride garage at the I-485 Station is filled to buffer and green space to the extent possible. capacity on weekday mornings.

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN 1111 8. Ensure that development adjacent to the Sterling, Pine Valley, and Sharonbrook neigh- General Corridor Area borhoods provides a good transition from the The remaining portion of the plan area, extending low scale neighborhoods to the taller buildings outward from the Transit Station Area, is classified as desired in the station area. Ensure that building the General Corridor Area. It is part of the larger South and site design for development in the vicinity of Growth Corridor. The area has interstate access from single family housing in these neighborhoods is of South and Westinghouse Boulevards, and includes a a scale and design that complements the existing range of uses designed to take advantage of interstate housing. and other vehicular access. These include automobile- oriented retail development, suburban office/ware- 9. Recognize the Sterling Elementary Public house properties, and institutional/civic uses. There School as an institutional use within the I-485 also are a number of multi-family developments along Station Area. Sharon Lakes Road and Sharon Road West. 10. Recognize the China Grove AME Zion Church as an institutional use within the I-485 Transit Land Use and Community Design Station Area. 12. Maintain a mixture of office, commercial, ware- house, and industrial land uses along Hebron Supporting Street Network Street East, England Street, Stockholm Court, Sweden Road, Denmark Road, East Westinghouse Key street network recommendations related to Boulevard, and Crafters Lane. These areas are proposed land use in this area are noted here. The currently developed with a mixture of low density Transportation and Streetscape section of this plan office/flex development, other commercial uses, provides more detail. and warehouse/light industrial uses. Development may be single use or include a mixture of uses. 11. Provide new street connections needed to create New development plans should also be consis- typical block lengths of 400 feet (desired), or 600 tent with the applicable design guidelines in the feet (maximum), as shown on Maps 3 and 4. General Development Policies. Properties within These connections are the highest priority for the a 1/2 mile walking distance of the Sharon Station plan area. could be converted to TOD if consolidated for redevelopment. The street network shown on existing industrial and commercial developments represents a long- term expectation at the point of property redevel- opment, not necessarily applicable to continuing uses in the nearer term. It should be noted that the street network shown on Map 3 and Map 4 provides a representation of the desired street network for the Sharon & I-485 plan area and may require adjustments to address site conditions. An alternative but comparable network, consistent with the intent of providing connectivity, will also be considered.

Industrial and commercial operations such as the Lance plant adjoin the Sharon Station, and are expected to remain for some time to come.

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN 12 13. Support continued moderate density residential • Sharon South Neighborhood, on Regent Park use on Sharonbrook Drive, and on Regent Park Lane and its connecting streets: This area is Lane and its connecting streets, at a density not generally beyond a ½ mile walk from Sharon to exceed 17 dua consistent with existing zoning. Station. It consists largely of existing individ- This will provide an appropriate transition from ually owned townhomes with some surround- the station area to areas of lesser density, and help ing multi-family development, designed as a to preserve the existing mature tree canopy in compatible whole. these areas. 14. Maintain the existing Pine Valley single-fam- ily neighborhood north of Carolina Pavilion • Sharonbrook Drive: This neighborhood at a density of up to 5 dwellings per acre (dua), consists of older single-family homes and a compatible with the existing homes. While the variety of small multi-family properties devel- adopted future land use for this neighborhood is Sharonoped over many & years. I-485 While some ofTransit the area single Station family, it currently Area has incompatible Plan multi- is within a ½ mile walk of Sharon Station, family zoning. Maintain the existing open space, increasedMap density would3: Recommended not be in character including Future neighborhood Land Use association and park with the neighborhood. and recreation facilities, as open space within the

W OLD HEBRON RD A T PENINSULA LN E neighborhood. TESSAVA R

C

CT R

E

ROCKLEDGE DR S

T

HILL RD

MAPLERIDGE DR STARVALLEY DR

SWEDEN RD MAPLE HEBRON ST WEST SUGAR

PL R D STOCKHOLM CT RIDGEBROOK DR

MAPLE

PL LONG VALLEY DR

WINDSONG DR

WISTER PL

H

BARK MEAD DR E

BR SHERBOURNE DR O THORNCLIFF DR N ENGLAND ST

C O S M HEBRON ST EAST H M

E A GARTH WOOD RD R DENMARK RD C 12 R E O DR 17 N

NATIONS FORD RD 26 22

LA OLD NATIONS OLDFORD NATIONS RD KES RD WITTSTOCK DR

COVEY CHASE DR

QUAIL HILL RD US HWY 521 26 15 MUSTANG LN

MAGGIE LN HOPETON RD T SHARON RD WEST 16 REGENT PARK LN 24

13 OBERBECK LN

SHARON BROOK DR

GRUENEWALD LN

PEWSBURY 12 13 RD

KNIGHTS BRIDGE RD KIRCHENBAUM DR WAYBRIDGE LN CRAFTERS LN CRESSIDA DR

CRUMP RD SHARON BROOK DR

BERGEN CT JENA CT

OLD NATIONS FORD RD

E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD LEIPZIG DR STERLING LN LODGEPOLE HEIDLEBURG LN PL

22 SPRUCE PINE PL LONGLEAF DR LYTHAM DR RD

TIMBERLINE AILEEN CIR RD

19 14

23 BIG

CONE

PL

26 SOUTH BLVD

YANDLE LN N CHURCH LO L BL LY OL LONGLEAF DR BREMER

GREYLEAF PL CT

TURNBERRY LN

23

E

21 V O R

ERVIN LN HEDDER

OLDENBURGCT DR

G

25 T EMSTEAD CT

ERVIN LN LANDSBURG LN HINA HINA

HANOVER GLEN DR

20 C GLISSON CT DENDY LN HANOVER RIDGE CT

AVONDALE AVE 23 HANOVER HOLLOW DR PACKARD ST HANOVER WOODS PL BIRNEN DR MYRTLE AVE

BRANSON 20 CT

BRANDEMERE CT

PINEVILLE RD (CLOSED) HANOVER SOUTH TL 18 I-485 BALMORAL CIR VERDUN DR 18 PARK CROSSING DR PENSHURST TRACE

BRAEMAR TL

WARWICK CIR

NICKELBY CT

LOGAN CT PALLISERS TR Map 3.2: General Corridor Area Recommendations TRESANTON DR Sharon & I-485 TransitFOXFALL DR Station Area Plan KILMORY TR

CHATHAM OAKS TR

QUEENS INDUSTRIAL DR OLD PINEVILLE RD OAK CT

LAND USE AND COMMUNITYKENLAUREN TR DESIGN CADILLAC ST

HADLEIGH PL

RODNEY ST CADILLAC ST

N

W E

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p S e than ma 0 750 1,500 Produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department. feet Date: November 06, 2008 13 15. Support continued moderate density residen- 20. Maintain the moderate density residential char- tial use along Sharon Road West and Sharon acter in the portions of the Sterling neighbor- Lakes Road at a density not to exceed 17 dwell- hood surrounding Sterling Elementary School ings per acre (dua). This area is generally beyond a and I-485 Station. Because of the close interrela- 1/2 mile walk from Sharon Station and has poor tionship between these areas and the low density street connectivity. It consists largely of existing single family portion of the neighborhood, build- multi-family developments. Redevelopment at a ing heights, setbacks, property access, and buffers density not to exceed 30 dua may be considered if to the existing homes will be important con- the following criteria are met: siderations. Density of up to 8 dua is generally appropriate, subject to further considerations as • Usable park / open space, and connections to follows: the greenway where adjacent, are provided; • Dendy Street and Packard Street west of • A significant low to moderate income housing China Grove Church Road have been devel- component in accordance with Council- oped with single family homes, generally at 8 adopted Affordable Housing Policies is dua. The plan should reflect this density. included in a mixed income environment; • Property south of Sterling School and along • A mixture of housing types is provided; Packard Street and Myrtle Avenue is irregu- • Existing mature trees are preserved, and an larly developed with single-family homes, appropriate street network is provided in and existing density here is appropriate. If accordance with this plan; all property owners come together to sell the land, and if additional direct vehicular • The Residential Design Guidelines in the access to South Boulevard can be achieved, General Development Policies are met. the property might be redeveloped at a higher 16. Recognize the Kennedy Charter Public School density up to TOD level, subject to appropri- as an institutional use within the plan area. ate height and buffer standards as related to the continuing single family neighborhood. 17. Recognize the Redeemed Christian Church of • Existing homes in common ownership gen- God as an institutional use within the plan area. erally along the west side of China Grove Church Road have a current density limit 18. Recognize the two day care centers at the south- of 8 dua. Development up to 17 dua will be ern end of the Sterling neighborhood as institu- considered only if the proposed plan has set- tional uses within the plan area. backs, dwelling entrances, building heights, street connections, and parking accommoda- 19. Maintain the low density single family portion tions that are compatible with the surround- of the Sterling neighborhood at a density up ing single family neighborhood. to 4 dua, consistent with existing land use and zoning. 21. Support moderate density residential use of the property west of the Sterling neighborhood at a density not to exceed 17 dwellings per acre (dua). This area is generally beyond a 1/2 mile walk from I-485 Station and has poor street con- nectivity. Because of its irregular boundaries and potential street interconnections with the Sterling neighborhood, buffers and height relationships to existing homes will be important considerations. Increased density not to exceed 30 dua may be considered if the following criteria are met: • Usable park / open space, and connections to the greenway where adjacent, are provided; • A significant low to moderate income housing component in accordance with Council- adopted Affordable Housing Policies is The Sterling neighborhood, adjoining the I-485 station, has included in a mixed income environment; affordable single family homes. Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN 14

A pedestrian path alongside Sterling Elementary School pro- Development is underway for the Little Sugar Creek Green- vides access to the I-485 station from the Sterling neighbor- way along the eastern edge of the plan area. hood.

• A mixture of housing types is provided; 25. Adjust the official boundary between the South Growth Corridor and the adjacent Wedge to the • Existing mature trees are preserved, and an east to be consistent with the boundary shown on appropriate street network is provided in Map 3. The flood plain on the eastern edge of the accordance with this plan; plan area and existing development therein will be • The Residential Design Guidelines in the included in the Growth Corridor. General Development Policies are met. 22. Provide an opportunity for a mixture of retail Supporting Street Network and office land uses for the properties along South Boulevard at the northern end of the Key street network recommendations related to plan area, and in the Westinghouse Boulevard proposed land use in this area are noted here. The vicinity. This area is beyond the 1/2 mile walk dis- Transportation and Streetscape section of this plan tance from the stations. It is envisioned to accom- provides more detail. modate a mixture of pedestrian-oriented uses, similar to transit oriented development, but at a 26. Maintain and enhance the existing street lesser intensity. Development may be single use network in the General Corridor Area as shown or include a mixture of uses. New development on Maps 3 and 4. Provide new street connections plans also should be consistent with the applica- needed to create typical block lengths of 600 feet ble design guidelines in the General Development desired, or 650 feet maximum. Policies. Building heights should not exceed four (4) stories or 40’ in height in this area. The proposed new streets shown represent a long- term expectation, to be built at the point of prop- 23. Recognize Mecklenburg County Park and erty redevelopment, not necessarily applicable to Recreation’s existing and proposed projects. continuing uses in the nearer term. The Little Sugar Creek Greenway is planned to extend from Archdale Drive to I-485. A new park It should be noted that the street network shown in the Pine Valley neighborhood is under devel- on Map 3 and Map 4 provides a representation opment. A park facility on East Westinghouse of the desired street network for the Sharon and Boulevard at Old Nations Ford Road, generally I-485 plan area and may require adjustments to along Kings Branch, is planned for the future. address site conditions. An alternative but compa- rable network, consistent with the intent of pro- 24. Recognize plans by the Mecklenburg County viding connectivity, will also be considered. Library System to develop a regional/branch library on Sharon Road West along Little Sugar Creek Greenway. Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN 15 Transportation and Streetscape Transforming the existing streets into an attractive 28. Provide new street connections in the General and functional multi-modal street network is criti- Corridor Area, as discussed in item 26 in the cal to the success of the plan area, especially the area Land Use Section. Street connections, creating around the LRT stations where transit-oriented devel- block lengths of 600 to 650 feet in the General opment is planned. Providing a well-connected street Corridor Area, are critical to alleviating congestion network is important throughout the study area to on South Boulevard, Westinghouse Boulevard, facilitate mobility choices and minimize congestion. Hebron Street, and Sharon Road West. New con- nections also support redevelopment and provide In conjunction with the establishment of the LRT a more balanced network of route choices. line, the City made a number of improvements to the Sharon & I-485 street network through the South 29. Increase connectivity within the Sterling Corridor Infrastructure Program (SCIP). This chapter neighborhood by extending existing street stubs recommends additional transportation improvements of Sterling Lane, Aileen Circle, and Ervin Lane for the plan area for new streets, street cross-sections, south of Westinghouse Boulevard and near the and streetscape elements. I-485 station at the time of any proposed devel- opment. Transportation/Street Design 30. Increase connectivity within the Pine Valley neighborhood by extending Timberline Road to Recommendations Sharon Road West, and a new local street between Longleaf Drive and Cressida Drive at the time of This section outlines transportation recommendations proposed redevelopment. addressing both proposed new streets and enhance- ments to existing streets to make them more pedes- 31. Plan for the extension of Myrtle Avenue to trian and bicycle friendly. These include both City South Boulevard as a condition for transit-ori- sponsored capital improvements, as well as improve- ented development within the Sterling neigh- ments that will be required in conjunction with new borhood areas south of the I-485 Station. Such development and redevelopment. new connection may require modification to the existing private drive serving the parking deck to The general locations of the recommendations are further connect to Carolina Pavilion Drive North, noted on Map 4. It should be noted that this map or may require connection to Carolina Pavilion provides a representation of the desired street network Drive South over, under, or across the rail rights of and may require adjustments to address site condi- way of both the LYNX and freight corridors. The tions. An alternative but comparable network con- final location and manner of these connections sistent with the intent of providing connectivity will will involve agreements between the railroad, the also be considered. City, CMS, and other parties that control these rights of way. The recommendations also are cross referenced using the item numbers in the Implementation section of this plan. Sidewalks 32. Widen sidewalk system along area thorough- Street Network fares. Many of these sidewalks are only five feet wide, inconsistent with the recommended width 27. Provide new street connections in the Transit found in the Streetscape Standards on subsequent Station Area, as discussed in item 11 in the Land pages. Additionally, planting strips which separate Use Section. Street connections, creating block pedestrians from vehicular traffic are narrow or lengths of 400 to 600 feet, are the highest priority completely lacking. This plan recommends wid- for this Plan, as these are needed to support high ening the sidewalks and adding planting strips density development and to provide additional along South Boulevard and other thoroughfares travel routes. The streets planned as part of tran- within the plan boundaries in conjunction with sit-oriented development along South Boulevard redevelopment. exemplify this principle.

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 16

South Boulevard at the entrance to the I-485 Station and A pedestrian bridge spans the light rail and freight rail lines, Parking garage is difficult for pedestrians. providing access to Sharon Station from South Boulevard.

33. Improve the sidewalk network in the Transit Bicycle Accommodations Station Area. As the streetscape cross-sections recommend, new development and redevelop- 35. Site new development to allow future addition ment should install sidewalks on all streets. New of bicycle lanes on thoroughfares. This plan rec- streets shown in the plan are largely located on ommends the long-term installation of bicycle blocks closest the stations. lanes along all thoroughfares as shown on Map 4.

Pedestrian Crossings Street Lighting 34. Enhance pedestrian and bicycle crossings. Area 36. Install pedestrian scale lighting in key loca- thoroughfares and major collectors can be dif- tions. Typical streetlights illuminate the roadway, ficult for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross due but do not provide significant lighting for the to factors such as traffic volume, traffic speed, pedestrian area of a street. Pedestrian scale lighting number of lanes, frequent turning movements, is shorter in height than streetlights and focuses and distance between signalized crosswalks. on lighting sidewalk areas. It should be installed While SCIP resulted in an enhanced intersection in the public right-of-way, with special attention at South Boulevard and Sharon Road West, other to blocks along and near South Boulevard and in intersections still have room for improvement. blocks adjacent to the Sharon and I-485 stations. This plan recommends adding enhanced cross- ings, as shown on Map 4. In the plan area, these include: • South Boulevard at Sweden Road and Sharon Lakes Road; • South Boulevard at Hebron Street; • South Boulevard at Westinghouse Boulevard and Cressida Drive; • Westinghouse Boulevard at Crump and China Grove Church Roads; and • South Boulevard at Carolina Pavilion North. Enhanced crossings may include a combination of vehicle traffic signals, pedestrian countdown signals, painted or textured cross walks, ADA curb ramps, and pedestrian refuge islands in the median. Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 17 Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan Map 4: Future Transportation Network

W OLD HEBRON RD A T PENINSULA LN E TESSAVA R

C

CT R

E

ROCKLEDGE DR ST

HILL RD

MAPLERIDGE DR SWEDEN RD STARVALLEY DR

MAPLE HEBRON ST WEST SUGAR

PL R D STOCKHOLM CT RIDGEBROOK DR MAPLE

PL LONG VALLEY DR

WINDSONG DR

WISTER PL

H

BARK MEAD DR E BR SHERBOURNE DR

O ENGLAND ST THORNCLIFF DR

N

C O S M H M HEBRON ST EAST E A GARTH WOOD RD R C R DENMARK RD E O

D R N

NATIONS FORD RD

LA OLD NATIONS OLDFORD NATIONS RD KES RD WITTSTOCK DR

COVEY CHASE DR

QUAIL HILL RD

MUSTANG LN

MAGGIE LN HOPETON RD

T SHARON RD WEST

REGENT PARK LN

OBERBECK LN

SHARON BROOK DR

GRUENEWALD LN PEWSBURY RD

KNIGHTS BRIDGE RD KIRCHENBAUM DR WAYBRIDGE LN CRAFTERS LN CRESSIDA DR

CRUMP RD SHARON BROOK DR

BERGEN CT JENA CT E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD

OLD NATIONS FORD RD

LEIPZIG DR

STERLING LN LODGEPOLE HEIDLEBURG LN PL

D SPRUCE PINE PL LONGLEAF DR LYTHAM DR R TIMBERLINE RD

AILEEN CIR

SOUTH BLVD

BIG

CONE

PL

YANDLE LN N CHURCH LO L BLOLLY LONGLEAF DR BREMER

GREYLEAF PL CT

TURNBERRY LN

E

OV R

ERVIN LN HEDDER

OLDENBURGCT DR

G

T EMSTEAD CT

ERVIN LN LANDSBURG LN HINA HINA

HANOVER GLEN DR

C GLISSON CT DENDY LN HANOVER RIDGE CT

AVONDALE AVE

HANOVER HOLLOW DR PACKARD ST HANOVER WOODS PL BIRNEN DR MYRTLE AVE

BRANSON CT

BRANDEMERE CT

PINEVILLE RD (CLOSED) HANOVER SOUTH TL I-485 BALMORAL CIR VERDUN DR PARK CROSSING DR

PENSHURST TRACE

BRAEMAR TL

WARWICK CIR

NICKELBY CT

LOGAN CT PALLISERS TR TRESANTON DR

FOXFALL DR

KILMORY TR

CHATHAM OAKS TR

QUEENS INDUSTRIAL DR OLD PINEVILLE RD OAK CT

KENLAUREN TR Enhanced PedestrianCADILLAC Crossing ST Street Connections*

Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing Bicycle Lanes HADLEIGH PL RODNEY ST PendingCADILLAC Street ST Connection Widened Sidewalk N

*Note: e location of the proposed streets is conceptual. Alternative locations,

W E

consistent with the intent of the proposed network, will also be considered.

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p S e than ma 0 750 1,500 Produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department. feet Date: November 05, 2008

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 18 Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan Map 5: Street Cross Section Key

W OLD HEBRON RD A T PENINSULA LN E TESSAVA R

C

CT R

E

ROCKLEDGE DR S

T

HILL RD

MAPLERIDGE DR STARVALLEY DR

SWEDEN RD MAPLE HEBRON ST WEST

SUGAR

PL R D STOCKHOLM CT RIDGEBROOK DR

MAPLE

PL LONG VALLEY DR ENGLAND ST

WINDSONG DR

WISTER PL

H

BARK MEAD DR E

BR SHERBOURNE DR

O THORNCLIFF DR N S C

O H

M HEBRON ST EAST A M R E GARTH WOOD RD R DENMARK RD O C E N

DR

NATIONS FORD RD L AK ES R OLD NATIONS OLDFORD NATIONS RD D

WITTSTOCK DR

COVEY CHASE DR

QUAIL HILL RD

MUSTANG LN

MAGGIE LN HOPETON RD T SHARON RD WEST

REGENT PARK LN

OBERBECK LN

SHARON BROOK DR

GRUENEWALD LN PEWSBURY RD

KNIGHTS BRIDGE RD KIRCHENBAUM DR WAYBRIDGE LN CRAFTERS LN CRESSIDA DR

CRUMP RD SHARON BROOK DR JENA CT E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD BERGEN CT

OLD NATIONS FORD RD

LEIPZIG DR

STERLING LN LODGEPOLE HEIDLEBURG LN PL

D SPRUCE PINE PL LONGLEAF DR LYTHAM DR R TIMBERLINE RD

AILEEN CIR

H SOUTH BLVD

BIG C CONE

R PL

YANDLE LN L N CHU O L BL LLY O LONGLEAF DR BREMER

GREYLEAF PL CT

TURNBERRY LN

E

V O

ERVIN LN HEDDER OLDENBURGCT DR

T EMSTEAD CT ERVIN LN LANDSBURG LN

HANOVER GLEN DR

CHINA GR CHINA GLISSON CT DENDY LN HANOVER RIDGE CT

AVONDALE AVE

HANOVER HOLLOW DR PACKARD ST HANOVER WOODS PL BIRNEN DR MYRTLE AVE

BRANSON CT

BRANDEMERE CT

PINEVILLE RD (CLOSED) HANOVER SOUTH TL I-485 BALMORAL CIR VERDUN DR PARK CROSSING DR

PENSHURST TRACE

BRAEMAR TL

WARWICK CIR

NICKELBY CT

LOGAN CT PALLISERS TR TRESANTON DR

FOXFALL DR

KILMORY TR

CHATHAM OAKS TR

QUEENS INDUSTRIAL DR Avenue: Four LaneOLD PINEVILLE RD Divided Local Residential Wide OAK CT KENLAUREN TR Avenue: Two Lane CADILLACUndivided ST Boulevard

Avenue: Two Lane Divided New Street*HADLEIGH PL

RODNEY ST CADILLAC ST Office/Commercial Wide N

*Note: e location of the proposed streets is conceptual. Alternative locations,

W E

consistent with the intent of the proposed network, will also be considered.

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p S e than ma 0 750 1,500 Produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department. feet Date: November 10, 2008

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 19 Streetscape Standards Street Cross-Sections Streets are more than just pathways to and through a Based on the City’s Urban Street Design Guidelines, place. Streets are one of the most highly visible types the future cross-sections have been determined for of urban places. As the entrance and exit to a com- streets within the Sharon & I-485 plan area, with the munity, streets have the ability to set the tone for the exception of the single family neighborhood areas surrounding environment. where little change to existing streets is expected. The following street types are recommended for the plan The streetscape cross-sections on the following pages area: are essential to “setting the tone” for the type of setting desired in the plan area. The cross sections have been • Boulevard developed in accordance with the Urban Street Design • Avenue - Four-Lane Divided Guidelines (USDG), adopted by City Council in October 2007. The cross-sections set forth: • Avenue - Two-Lane Undivided • Avenue - Two-Lane Divided • Building setback requirements, • Office/Commercial Street - Wide • Streetscape, sidewalk, and street tree require- ments, and • Local Residential Street - Wide • Future character of the streets regarding the Map 5 shows the desired location for each of these number of lanes, bicycle, pedestrian and street types. Consult this map to identify the rec- transit accommodations and provisions for ommendation for a specific street, then refer to the on-street parking. matching cross-section on the following pages. Streets within neighborhood areas slated for preservation are When this plan is approved, the streetscape standards intended for preservation as well, so new cross sec- specified herein will become the official “Streetscape tions for these areas are not provided. Plan” for the study area, as referred to in the zoning standards for a number of the City’s urban zoning dis- tricts. As such, all new development on sites zoned TOD, TS, PED, UMUD, MUDD, NS, UR, or other urban zoning districts that may be established must be designed in accordance with these standards. The specifications in the cross-sections are based on typical conditions and may vary based upon further study and in unique circumstances. Note that these cross-sections are not plans for imme- diate road improvements, but many are recommended long-term changes. Improvements such as on-street parking, streetscape enhancements, and sidewalk installation typically will be implemented through private redevelopment, although the City may fund minor improvements. New streets also typically will be implemented through private development, while major improvements to existing streets generally will be constructed by the City.

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 20 Boulevard Description: Boulevards are intended to move large • Continuous median with left turn lanes and numbers of vehicles, often as “through traffic,” from pedestrian refuge. one part of the city to another, and to other lower • Additional widening for turn lanes may be level streets in the network. Thus, the modal priority required in some circumstances in accordance shifts toward motor vehicles, while still accommodat- with CDOT standards. ing pedestrians and cyclists as safely and comfortably as possible. Behind the Curb: Minimum building setback is 24 feet from back of (unrecessed) recommended curb. Land Use: The land use will vary; within the plan Tree planting is required with spacing, irrigation, area the desired uses will be typically medium density subdrainage, and adequate soil space for roots per the mixed use; retail, office, industrial, warehouse, and Charlotte Tree Ordinance. distribution uses. • Planting strip serves as buffer from traffic to Situation: South Boulevard is a major thoroughfare. pedestrians on sidewalk. Because of intense From Sharon Lakes Road southward to I-485, traffic traffic on this street, on-street parking is not volumes and speeds increase significantly from the appropriate. portion of South Boulevard further north. Within • Ped zone is the usual location for the clear this plan area, a four-lane divided Boulevard cross sidewalk. section is recommended. • The additional planting strip behind the side- Existing Condition: South Boulevard in this plan walk is intended to provide additional land- area has two lanes in each direction, widened for left scaping, and a buffer between sidewalk and and right turn lanes and merging lanes in various building uses. It can be used for landscap- locations. Right of way is typically 100 feet, varying ing, sidewalk dining, or paved merchandis- significantly from 60 feet to over 200 feet in some ing purposes, as appropriate to the land use. locations. Encroachments into this strip for features such as steps and open porches are allowed Proposed Curb to Curb: Recommended width is in accordance with the zoning ordinance, but 76 feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb; right-of- encroachments at grade may not reduce the way is 124 feet. clear sidewalk to less than 8 feet. • Two travel Boulevard-Southlanes and bike lane in each Tryon direc- Street-Clanton Road to I-77 tion.

Central Av

Vehicle Vehicle *Includes 2.5’ Lanes Lanes curb and gutter. Bike Lane* Bike Lane* Ped Zone Ped Ped Zone Ped Planting Strip Planting Strip Planting Planting Strip Planting Planting Strip Planting Turn Lane/ Turn c/g 1.5’ Median. 8’ 8’ 8’ 7.5’ 22‘ 17’ 22‘ 7.5’ 8’ 8’ 8’ 76’ 24’ Setback Back of curb to back of curb 24’ Setback Right of Way-124’

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 21 Avenue - Four-Lane Divided Description: The Avenue is the most common (non- • Additional widening for turn lanes may be local) street type in Charlotte, providing access from required in some circumstances in accordance neighborhoods to commercial areas, between areas of with CDOT standards. the city, and, in some cases, through neighborhoods. Behind the Curb It is designed to provide a balance of service for all : Minimum building setback is 24 modes of transportation, including accessibility for feet from back of (unrecessed) recommended curb. transit, pedestrians, and bicyclists in addition to car- Tree planting is required with spacing, irrigation, rying significant automobile traffic. subdrainage, and adequate soil space for roots per the Charlotte Tree Ordinance. Land Use: The land use will vary; within the plan area the desired uses will be typically medium to high • Planting strip or recessed on-street parallel density mixed use, residential, office, and retail. parking serves as buffer from traffic to pedes- trians on sidewalk. Planting strip with trees is Situation: The major thoroughfares in the plan area the standard expectation. Recessed on-street are classified primarily as Avenues. The four lane parking is an option per zoning and CDOT divided type is recommended for Sharon Road West. standards, with intermittent planter islands to The proposed cross-section will allow this street to break up parking into bays no more than 100 continue to perform an important mobility function feet in length. for motorists, as well as to support safe and comfort- • Amenity zone provides supplemental tree able pedestrian and bicycle travel. planting location. Trees in the amenity zone should be planted in curbed planters. The Existing Condition: This street typically has two amenity zone also provides additional paved lanes in each direction, widened for left turn lanes area for street furniture, paved access to on- near some intersections. Right-of-way varies signifi- street parking, and merchandising purposes. cantly from 60 feet upward. • Ped zone is the usual location for the clear side- Proposed Curb to Curb: Recommended width is 70 walk. Where there is no on-street parking and feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb; right-of-way planting strips are in place, the clear sidewalk is 118 feet. can be pushed into the amenity zone location and the ped zone can be used for landscap- Two travel lanes and bike lane in each direction. ing, sidewalk dining, or paved merchandising • purposes. Encroachments into the ped zone • Continuous center lane for left turns and for features such as steps and open porches are pedestrian refuge; to include mid-block land- allowed in accordance with the zoning ordi- scaped pedestrian refuge islandsAvenue-4 in some loca- Lane Dividednance, but encroachments at grade may not tions. reduce the clear sidewalk to less than 8 feet.

Central Av

*South Blvd: Vehicle Vehicle *Includes 2.5’ On-street parking Lanes Lanes curb and gutter. Bike Lane* Bike Lane* Ped Zone Ped Ped Zone Ped Amenity Zone Amenity Zone *Parking/Trees Turn Lane/ Turn c/g 1.5’ Median. is optional south of *Parking/Trees Scaleybark Road. 8’ 8’ 8’ 7.5’ 22‘ 11’ 22‘ 7.5’ 8’ 8’ 8’ 70’ 24’ Setback Back of curb to back of curb 24’ Setback Right of Way-118’ Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 22 Avenue - Two-Lane Undivided Description: The Avenue is the most common (non- • Widening for left turn lanes may be required local) street providing access from neighborhoods to in some circumstances in accordance with commercial areas, between areas of the city, and, in CDOT standards. some cases, through neighborhoods. It is designed to Proposed Behind the Curb: Minimum building provide a balance of service for all modes of transpor- setback is 24 feet from back of (unrecessed) recom- tation, including accessibility for transit, pedestrians, mended curb. Tree planting is required with spacing, and bicyclists in addition to carrying significant auto- irrigation, subdrainage, and adequate soil space for mobile traffic. roots per the Charlotte Tree Ordinance. Land Use: The land use will vary; within the plan area • Planting strip or recessed on-street parallel the desired uses will include medium to high density parking serve as buffer from traffic to pedes- mixed use and residential, and some office, industrial, trians on sidewalk. The recessed parking is warehouse, and distribution uses. required in all locations feasible under CDOT standards, with intermittent planter islands Situation: This Avenue cross section is narrower than to break up parking into bays no more than the four-lane divided version used for Sharon Road 100 feet in length. Planting strip with trees is West. It is recommended for England Street, Sweden required in all other situations. Road, Sharon Lakes Road, and Crump Road within the Transit Station and General Corridor Areas. The • Amenity zone provides supplemental tree proposed cross-section will allow this street type to planting location. Trees in the amenity zone continue to perform an important mobility function should be planted in curbed planters. The for motorists, as well as to support safe and comfort- amenity zone also provides additional paved able pedestrian and bicycle travel. area for street furniture, paved access to on- street parking, and merchandising purposes. Existing Condition: These streets have one lane in • Ped Zone is the usual location for the clear each direction, generally without turn lanes or land- sidewalk. Where there is no on-street parking scaped median but with some variation at major and planting strips are in place, the clear side- intersections. Right-of-way is generally 60 to 80 feet, walk can be pushed into the amenity zone but varying more and less. location, and the ped zone can be used for landscaping, sidewalk dining, or paved mer- Proposed Curb to Curb: Recommended width is 37 chandising purposes. Encroachments into feet from back of curb to back of curb; right-of-way the ped zone for features such as steps and is 85 feet. open porches are allowed in accordance with the zoning ordinance, but encroachments at • One travel lane and bike laneAvenue-Two in each direc- Lane Undividedgrade may not reduce the clear sidewalk to tion. less than 8 feet.

Central Av

Vehicle Vehicle *Includes 2.5’ Lane Lane curb and gutter. Bike Lane* Bike Lane* Ped Zone Ped Ped Zone Ped Parking/Trees Parking/Trees Amenity Zone Amenity Zone 8’ 8’ 8’ 7.5’ 22’ 7.5’ 8’ 8’ 8’ 37’ 24’ Setback Back of curb to back of curb 24’ Setback Right of Way-85’ Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 23 Avenue - Two-Lane Divided

Description: The Avenue is the most common (non- Proposed Behind the Curb: Minimum building local) street providing access from neighborhoods to setback is 24 feet from back of (unrecessed) recom- commercial areas, between areas of the city, and, in mended curb. Tree planting is required with spacing, some cases, through neighborhoods. It is designed to irrigation, subdrainage, and adequate soil space for provide a balance of service for all modes of transpor- roots per the Charlotte Tree Ordinance. tation, including accessibility for transit, pedestrians, and bicyclists in addition to carrying significant auto- • Planting strip or recessed on-street parallel mobile traffic. parking serve as buffer from traffic to pedes- trians on sidewalk. The recessed parking is Land Use: The land use will vary; within the plan required in all locations feasible under CDOT area the desired uses will be typically medium to high standards, with intermittent planter islands density mixed use and office, industrial, warehouse, to break up parking into bays no more than and distribution uses. 100 feet in length. Planting strip with trees is required in all other situations. Situation: This Avenue cross section is narrower than the four-lane divided version used on Sharon Road • Amenity zone provides supplemental tree West. It is recommended for Hebron Street East. The planting location. Trees in the amenity zone proposed cross-section will allow this street type to should be planted in curbed planters. The continue to perform an important mobility function amenity zone also provides additional paved for motorists, as well as to support safe and comfort- area for street furniture, paved access to on- able pedestrian and bicycle travel. street parking, and merchandising purposes. • Ped Zone is the usual location for the clear Existing Condition: This street has one lane in each sidewalk. Where there is no on-street parking direction, with median and left turn lanes near inter- and planting strips are in place, the clear side- sections. Right-of-way is about 80 feet. walk can be pushed into the amenity zone location, and the ped zone can be used for Proposed Curb to Curb: Recommended width is 48 landscaping, sidewalk dining, or paved mer- feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb; right-of-way chandising purposes. Encroachments into is 96 feet. the ped zone for features such as steps and open porches are allowed in accordance with • One travel lane and bike lane in each direc- the zoning ordinance, but encroachments at tion. grade may not reduce the clear sidewalk to • Continuous center lane for left turns and less than 8 feet. pedestrian refuge; to includeAvenue-Two mid-block land- Lane Divided scaped pedestrian refuge islands in some loca- tions.

Central Av

Vehicle Vehicle *Includes 2.5’ Lane Lane curb and gutter. Bike Lane* Bike Lane* Turn Lane/ Turn Refuge Ped. c/g 1.5’ Ped Zone Ped Ped Zone Ped Parking/Trees Amenity Zone Amenity Zone Parking/Trees 8’ 8’ 8’ 7.5’ 11‘ 11’ 11‘ 7.5’ 8’ 8’ 8’ 48’ 24’ Setback Back of curb to back of curb 24’ Setback Right of Way-96’

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 24 Office / Commercial Street - Wide

Description: Local streets provide access to residen- • On-street parking on both sides. Curb exten- tial, industrial, commercial, or mixed use develop- sions may be used to narrow street width at ment. The majority of Charlotte’s streets are classified intersections and other locations where on- as local streets and are typically built through the land street parking is not appropriate. development process. • Widening for left-turn lanes may be required Land Use: In the study area, the land use along these in some circumstances in accordance with streets is typically office, warehouse/industrial, and CDOT standards. retail development with an auto orientation. It may Proposed Behind the Curb: Minimum building include medium density mixed-use development. setback is 14 feet from back of (recessed) recom- mended curb, or 21 feet from back of any extended Situation: The office/commercial streets are recom- curb. Tree planting is required with spacing, irriga- mended in the portions of the Transit Station Area tion, subdrainage, and adequate soil space for roots and General Corridor Area where residential uses are per the Charlotte Tree Ordinance. not anticipated. Office/commercial streets are appro- priate because they provide basic pedestrian ameni- • Planting strip provides buffer from traffic to ties while allowing for reasonable vehicular access and pedestrians on the sidewalk, and a landscaping speeds. opportunity. In locations with retail frontage or other high density applications, tree plant- Existing Condition: These streets generally have one ing in curbed planters, with paved amenity lane in each direction; some have on-street parking. zone for street furniture, paved access to on- Right-of-way is typically 50 to 60 feet. street parking, and merchandising purposes should be substituted for the planting strip. Proposed Curb to Curb: Recommended width is 41 feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb; right-of-way • Ped Zone is the usual location for the clear is 69 feet. sidewalk. Encroachments into the ped zone for features such as steps and open porches are • One travel lane in each direction shared with allowed in accordance with the zoning ordi- bicyclists. nance, but encroachments at grade may not reduce the clear sidewalk to less than 6 feet.

Office/Commercial-Wide

Mixed Vehicle Zone *Includes 2.5’ curb and gutter.

Planting strip Planting or curbed planter strip or Planting curbed planter

Ped Zone Ped Ped Zone Ped Parking* Parking* 6’ 8’ 7’ 7’ 8’ 6’

Min. 41’ Min. 14’ Setback Back of curb to back of curb 14’ Setback Right of Way-69’

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE Local Residential Street - Wide 25 Description: Local streets provide access to residen- Proposed Behind the Curb: Minimum building tial, industrial, commercial or mixed-use develop- setback is 20 to 22 feet from back of (recessed) rec- ment. The majority of Charlotte’s streets are classified ommended curb, or 27 to 29 feet from back of any as local streets and are typically built through the land extended curb, depending on the sidewalk width development process. requirement. Tree planting is required with spacing, irrigation, subdrainage, and adequate soil space for Land Use: The land use is typically medium to high roots per the Charlotte Tree Ordinance. density residential, with some mixed use development. • Planting strip provides buffer from traffic to Situation: Wide local residential streets are recom- pedestrians on the sidewalk, and a landscaping mended in portions of the plan area where residential opportunity. In locations with retail frontage uses higher in density than single-family are in place or other high density applications, tree plant- or expected. They also are recommended in portions ing in curbed planters, with paved amenity of the transit station area off of the main thoroughfares zone for street furniture, paved access to on- where a predominance of residential development street parking, and merchandising purposes is expected. The local residential street cross-section should be substituted for the planting strip. is designed for low traffic speeds and a comfortable • Ped zone is the usual location for the clear walking, cycling and living environment. sidewalk. For streets located within 1/4 mile Existing Condition walk of the transit station, the minimum : These streets have one lane in sidewalk width is 8 feet. Elsewhere in the plan each direction. Some have on-street parking. Right- area the minimum width is 6 feet. of-way varies widely, but is typically 50 to 60 feet. • The yard area is intended to provide addi- Proposed Curb to Curb: Recommended width is 35 tional landscaping and a buffer between side- feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb; right-of-way walk and residential uses. Encroachments for is 63 to 67 feet, depending on the sidewalk require- features such as steps and open porches are ment. allowed in accordance with the zoning ordi- nance, but encroachments at grade may not • One travel lane in each direction shared with reduce the clear sidewalk to less than the bicyclists. required width. • On-street parking on both sides. Curb exten- • Parcels located on streets that have existing sions may be used to narrow street width at single-family zoning designations (R-3, R-4, intersections and other locations where on- R-5, R-6, and R-8) either across the street, or street parking is not appropriate. abutting on the same side of the street, shall have a minimum setback of 30 feet. • Widening for left-turn lanes may be required in some circumstances in accordance with CDOT standards.

Mixed Vehicle Zone *Includes 2.5’ curb and gutter. Parking* Planting Strip Planting Planting Strip Planting

Parking*

Ped Zone Ped

Ped Zone Ped Yard Yard **30’ setback across 6’ 6’ to 8‘ 8 ’ 7’ 7’ 8’ 6’ to 8‘ 6’ from or next to single 35’ **20’ to 22’ **20’ to 22’ family zoning. Setback Back of curb to back of curb Setback Right of Way-63’ to 67’ Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan TRANSPORTATION AND STREETSCAPE 26 Infrastructure and Public Facilities

The core of the Sharon & I-485 plan area includes 38. Encourage the burying of utilities. Overhead properties that currently are industrial and auto-ori- utility lines detract from the appearance of the ented commercial; however these properties are rec- station area, which in turn may impact the eco- ommended for eventual higher density redevelopment. nomic competitiveness of a project. Overhead Their infrastructure, while sufficient and appropriate lines also may impact development density due for its current uses, may require capacity increases for to required clearances from the lines. As redevel- more intense new uses. The following recommenda- opment occurs, opportunities to relocate or bury tions are intended to address needs for additional or utility lines should be pursued. expanded infrastructure and public facilities. Park and Greenway Public Facility/Infrastructure Recommendations Recommendations 39. Provide opportunities for expansion and 37. Conduct an infrastructure study to evaluate improved access for the Little Sugar Creek the adequacy of infrastructure (water, sewer, Greenway and the Kings Branch Park in storm drainage) in the station area. The ability of accordance with Mecklenburg County Park and the station area’s infrastructure to support high Recreation master plans. density redevelopment and capacity of the other utility systems is not fully detailed. To ensure that 40. Encourage urban open spaces in the Transit the station area will be able to support the new, Station Area. New developments in the area higher-density development recommended by should provide usable urban open spaces, either this plan, a detailed infrastructure analysis is rec- on-site or off-site within the station area. Desirable ommended. types of urban open spaces include pocket parks, plazas, and community gardens. The areas in immediate proximity to the two transit stations are high priorities for open space.

Sterling Elementary School adjoins the I-485 station. The plan area is flanked by Little Sugar Creek and Kings Branch Creek, with greenway and park improvements planned. Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES 27 Environment

The Sharon & I-485 plan area includes a substantial 43. Protect or enhance the watersheds when pos- area of present and former commercial and industrial sible. The Sharon & I-485 plan area sits ona development, some of which is expected to be redevel- ridge line between Little Sugar Creek to the east oped in the coming years. The environmental recom- and Kings Branch Creek to the west. Degradation mendations focus on means to improve air, water and to either creek would be a negative impact to the land quality through the redevelopment process. community. Any development or redevelopment in the area will have a goal to improve the quality It should be noted that the establishment of dense of runoff, reduce flooding impacts, and reduce transit oriented development within station areas is runoff if possible. This will primarily be achieved intended to improve the environment of the region with the provisions of the Post Construction by concentrating growth where it can be supported Controls Ordinance. by transit and other infrastructure, by relieving the pressure for growth on outlying greenfield locations, 44. Assist property owners with remediation of and by reducing vehicular trips and trip lengths that sites known or perceived to have contaminated otherwise would extend to the outer edge of the met- soil. Soil contamination poses an obvious hazard ropolitan area. to the environment; however, it can also serve as an obstacle to development. Since contamination Environmental Recommendations is a potential issue in the transit station area, prop- erty owners should be encouraged to participate 41. Make trees a key feature of the entire plan area. in the funding programs offered by the City of Residential neighborhoods are characterized by Charlotte to financially assist with the assessment their mature tree canopy. Trees could become a key of contaminated sites. feature for the entire study area if they are added to streets in the Transit Station and Corridor Areas. In addition to their aesthetic value, trees help to reduce stormwater run-off, slow soil erosion, absorb air pollutants and provide shade. Where street trees currently exist in the station area, they should be maintained and replaced as necessary. In parts of the station area where street trees do not currently exist, they should be planted as part of any new development or redevelopment in accordance with the streetscape cross-sections. 42. Design site plans for new buildings and reno- vations in the station area to improve water quality for stormwater run-off. Over the last decade, innovative design solutions have been developed to address the water quality of storm- water runoff. These best practices in on-site storm- water management include the use of bioswales or rain gardens, rooftop rain capture, and pervi- ous parking areas. Because of the large amount of impervious surface area and the proximity of nearby creeks, new developments and redevelop- ments in the station area are encouraged to incor- porate design features that improve the quality of stormwater leaving their site, consistent with the Council-adopted Post Construction Controls Ordinance. The tree canopy in existing neighborhoods of the plan area is an amenity to be preserved and emulated in new develop- ment. Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan ENVIRONMENT Uptown

South End

New Bern

Scaleybark

Volume 2: Woodlawn 29 Implementation Tyvola Plan Archdale

Arrowood

Sharon Road West

I-485/South Boulevard Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan 30 Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan Map 6: Corrective Rezonings

W OLD HEBRON RD AT PENINSULA LN E TESSAVA R

C

CT R

E

ROCKLEDGE DR ST

HILL RD

MAPLERIDGE DR STARVALLEY DR

SWEDEN RD MAPLE HEBRON ST WEST SUGAR

PL R D STOCKHOLM CT RIDGEBROOK DR MAPLE

PL LONG VALLEY DR

WINDSONG DR

WISTER PL

H

BARK MEAD DR E

BR SHERBOURNE DR O

THORNCLIFF DR N ENGLAND ST

C O S M HEBRON ST EAST H M

E A GARTH WOOD RD R DENMARK RD C R E O

DR N

NATIONS FORD RD

LA OLD NATIONS OLDFORD NATIONS RD KES RD WITTSTOCK DR

COVEY CHASE DR

QUAIL HILL RD

US HWY 521 MUSTANG LN

MAGGIE LN HOPETON RD T SHARON RD WEST

REGENT PARK LN

OBERBECK LN

SHARON BROOK DR

GRUENEWALD LN

PEWSBURY RD

KNIGHTS BRIDGE RD KIRCHENBAUM DR WAYBRIDGE LN CRAFTERS LN CRESSIDA DR

CRUMP RD SHARON BROOK DR

BERGEN CT JENA CT

OLD NATIONS FORD RD

E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD LEIPZIG DR STERLING LN LODGEPOLE HEIDLEBURG LN PL

D SPRUCE PINE PL LONGLEAF DR LYTHAM DR R TIMBERLINE AILEEN CIR RD

BIG

CONE

PL

SOUTH BLVD

YANDLE LN N CHURCH LO L BL LY OL LONGLEAF DR BREMER

GREYLEAF PL CT

TURNBERRY LN

E

V O

ERVIN LN HEDDER OLDENBURGCT DR

T EMSTEAD CT ERVIN LN LANDSBURG LN

HANOVER GLEN DR

CHINA GR CHINA GLISSON CT DENDY LN HANOVER RIDGE CT

AVONDALE AVE

HANOVER HOLLOW DR PACKARD ST HANOVER WOODS PL BIRNEN DR MYRTLE AVE

BRANSON CT

BRANDEMERE CT

PINEVILLE RD (CLOSED) HANOVER SOUTH TL I-485 BALMORAL CIR VERDUN DR Proposed Rezonings PARK CROSSING DR

PENSHURST TRACE

Rezone to R-5 BRAEMAR TL

Rezone to R-8 WARWICK CIR Rezone to TOD-M NICKELBY CT

LOGAN CT PALLISERS TR TRESANTON DR

FOXFALL DR

KILMORY TR

CHATHAM OAKS TR

QUEENS INDUSTRIAL DR OLD PINEVILLE RD OAK CT

KENLAUREN TR CADILLAC ST

HADLEIGH PL

RODNEY ST CADILLAC ST

N

W E

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p S e than ma 0 750 1,500 Produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department. feet Date: December 09, 2008

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 31 Implementation Plan The recommendations of the Sharon & I-485 Transit Private Sector Responsibilities Station Area Plan will be implemented in a number of ways. First and foremost, all of the recommendations The private sector will be responsible for developing in the plan, once adopted, are City policy. As such, and redeveloping properties within the plan area con- the recommendations will guide future decision-mak- sistent with the vision, policies, and recommenda- ing in the study area, such as requests for rezoning. tions included in the Concept Plan. Ensuring that the infrastructure required in conjunction with develop- This Implementation Plan outlines the strategies to ment is provided will be part of these development help implement the land use, community design, responsibilities. transportation, and other development-oriented rec- ommendations contained in the adopted Concept Plan. Implementation strategies are listed on the Corrective Rezonings following pages. The number of each action corre- sponds to the number for the recommendation in the The Planning Department will initiate corrective Concept Plan. The responsible agency and possible rezonings to implement the land use vision and rec- time frame also are included. ommendations adopted as part of the Concept Plan. The proposed rezonings are shown on Map 6. The These implementation strategies will not be approved rezoning process will occur after the adoption of the by elected officials as part of the Concept Plan adop- Concept Plan. tion. The strategies that require City Council approval will be brought forward on a case by case basis after The proposed rezonings to TOD-M may be initiated the Concept Plan has been adopted and the public in one or more groups, or may be proposed on a case- has had an opportunity to give input. by-case basis in order to insure that new streets and other recommendations of this plan are provided by Because this Implementation Plan is not adopted by new development. elected officials, the public sector sponsored items listed on the following pages are ideas for imple- A number of properties in the Transit Station Area mentation, not a commitment. The projects may be are occupied by major ongoing businesses and indus- revised over time; as such this Implementation Plan trial operations. While not transit-oriented in nature, should be updated periodically to reflect changes and it is recognized that these uses serve other important progress. employment and economic functions within the City. These properties should retain their commer- Public Sector Responsibilities cial or industrial zoning to allow them to continue as-of-right operations until such time as the property With input from the community, the public sector will owners are ready for redevelopment. provide the policy framework for land development and will be responsible for making a number of infra- structure improvements. In addition, the Charlotte- Mecklenburg Planning Department, in consultation with other City and County departments, is respon- sible for initiating and guiding the corrective rezon- ing process and monitoring and reviewing rezonings proposed for the plan area to ensure that future devel- opment meets the required standards and reflects the intent of the adopted policy.

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 32 Implementation Strategies The number of each action corresponds to the number for the recommendation in the Concept Plan. Action Item Type Lead Priority Agency Land Use and Community Design

1 Support continuing use of major industrial operations Zoning Planning as devel located adjoining or in close proximity to the Sharon occurs Station.

2a Rezone area recommended for transit oriented Zoning Planning Short development to TOD-M per Map 6. (0-5 yr)

2b Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

3 Encourage capacity expansion of the I-485 park-and-ride Transit CATS Medium facility. (0-5 yr)

4 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

5 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

6 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

7 Create open space or pedestrian amenities at both transit Zoning Planning as devel stations. occurs

8 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

9 Not Applicable NA NA NA

10 Not Applicable NA NA NA

11 New street connections - Provide new street connections Transp. CDOT as devel needed to create typical block lengths of 400 feet desired, occurs or 600 feet maximum, as shown on Map 4. Specifically, extend streets as noted in the plan.

12 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

13 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

14 Maintain the existing Pine Valley single-family Zoning Planning Short neighborhood through corrective rezoning to R-5. (0-5 yr)

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 33 Action Item Type Lead Priority Agency

15 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

16 Not Applicable NA NA NA

17 Not Applicable NA NA NA

18 Not Applicable NA NA NA

19 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

20 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals, and maintain single-family occurs neighborhood along Dendy Street and Packard Street west of China Grove Church Road through corrective rezoning to R-8.

21 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

22 Use land use recommendations to guide and evaluate Zoning Planning as devel development proposals. occurs

23 Recognize Mecklenburg County Park & Recreation's Zoning Planning as devel existing and proposed projects. occurs

24 Recognize Plans by the Mecklenburg County Library Zoning Planning as devel System to develop a regional/branch library on Sharon occurs Rd. West along Little Sugar Creek Greenway.

25 Adjust the official boundary between the South Growth Planning Planning Short Corridor. (0-5 yr)

26 Maintain and enhance the existing street network in the Transp. CDOT as devel General Corridor Area. occurs Transportation / Street Design

27 see # 11 Transp. CDOT as devel occurs

28 see # 26 Transp. CDOT as devel occurs

29 Increase connectivity within the Sterling neighborhood. Transp. CDOT as devel occurs

30 Increase connectivity within the Pine Valley Transp. CDOT as devel neighborhood. occurs

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 34 Action Item Type Lead Priority Agency

31 Plan for the extension of Myrtle Avenue to South Blvd. as Transp. CDOT Long a condition for TOD within the Sterling neighborhood (>10 yrs) areas south of the I-485 Station.

32 Widen sidewalks along thoroughfares. Transp. CDOT as devel occurs

33 Improve the sidewalk network in the Transit Station Area. Transp. CDOT as devel occurs

34 Enhance pedestrian and bicycle crossings on major Transp. CDOT Medium thoroughfares and major collectors. (5-10 yr)

35 Site new developments to allow future addition of bicycle Transp. CDOT as devel lanes on thoroughfares. occurs

36 Install pedestrian scale lighting in key locations. Transp. CDOT Medium (5-10 yr) Infrastructure and Public Facilities

37 Conduct and infrastructure study to evaluate the adequacy Utilities E&PM / Medium of infrastructure. CMU" (5-10 yr)

38 Encourage the burying of utilities. Utilities Planning as devel occurs

39 Provide opportunities for expansion and improved access Park Park & Rec / as devel for the Little Sugar Creek and Kings Branch Park. CDOT occurs

40 Encourage urban open spaces in the Transit Station Area. Park Planning / Medium Park & Rec (5-10 yr) Environment

41 Make trees a key feature of the entire plan area. Zoning/ Planning / Medium Tree Ord. Park & Rec (5-10 yr)

42 Design site plans for new buildings and renovations in Stormwater E&PM as devel the station area to improve water quality for stormwater occurs run-off.

43 Protect or enhance the watersheds when possible. Stormwater E&PM as devel occurs

44 Assist property owners with remediation of sites known or Brownfield Econ. Dev. as devel perceived to have contaminated soil. occurs

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Uptown

South End

New Bern

Scaleybark Appendix: Woodlawn 35 Tyvola

Archdale

Arrowood

Sharon Road West

I-485/South Boulevard Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan 37 Existing Conditions

58% This chapter examines existing demographic, environ- 52% mental, land use, design, transportation, and infra- structure conditions in the Sharon & I-485 plan area. 34%33% It provides a framework for understanding the oppor- tunities and constraints identified in the Concept 12% Plan. 7% 5% 4% 8% 5% 1% 0% White Black American Asian/ Other Hispanic Demographics Indian Pacific Islander Sharon & I-485 Transit City of Charlotte According to the 2000 U.S. Census, the Sharon Station Area & I-485 plan area is home to approximately 6,886 Source: 2000 U.S. Census Block Data residents. The majority of these residents are white Note: People of Hispanic origin are also included in the racial breakdowns. (52%) and about thirty-four percent (34%) are black. Population Charactertistics for Sharon & I-485 Station Area Hispanic residents comprise twelve percent (12%) of Plan and Charlotte the area’s population. Less than Doctorate 9th grade 1% 1% A majority of residents in the plan area (77%) are Professional 1% Grade 9-12 working age adults, between ages 18 and 64 years. 9% Nineteen percent of the study area residents are below Master age 18, while only 4% are over the age of 65. 7% Approximately 47% of residents in the plan area have a household income of less than $35,000 compared Bachelor HS Graduate to 36% for households in Charlotte overall. 28% 23% The level of educational attainment for residents in the plan area varies, as seen on the accompanying diagram. Some College The differences in educational levels may contribute 24% to the range of occupations for residents in the plan Associate area, as noted in the accompanying diagram. 4% Although the occupations are diverse within the area, Source: 2000 U.S. Census Block Group Data the mode of transportation to work among residents Educational Level for Sharon & I-485 Station Area Plan is very similar. Of the working population, 96% travel to work by car, truck or van; 2% use public transporta- Production/Transportation/Material Moving tion and the remaining 2% are split between individ- 13% uals who walk to work and work at home. The average Construction/ travel time to work is approximately 21 minutes. Maintenance 7% Issues/Opportunities: As the area continues to grow, the diverse population pro- Management/ vides an opportunity for this area to become a unique Professional place for people to live and work. 40%

Sales/Office In addition, the LYNX Blue Line can provide an alter- 29% native mode of transportation for some residents within Service the area. 11%

Source: 2000 U.S. Census Block Group Data Employment Industry for Sharon & I-485 Station Area Plan Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 38

Sweden Rd Sweden Rd Heb He ron S bron Sh t St L a ak ro es n

R d Sha ron L a

k

e

s

R d

Sh T aron T Sharon Rd st West Rd We

Blvd use gho stin We Westinghouse Blvd

South Blvd T T South Blvd

I-485 I-485

N N

W E W E

S S 0 750 1,500 0 750 1,500 feet feet

SWIM Buffers 15 - 25% Slope Tree Canopy (2002 Data) T Transit Station and Line FEMA 100 Year Floodplain Greater Than 25% Slope Community Floodplain Wetlands Existing Ponds Existing Streams T Transit Station and Line Environment Tree Cover The South Boulevard corridor and the industrial areas, Natural Features both east and west of the rail line, have minimal tree The Sharon Road West and I-485/South Boulevard cover. These areas have scarce landscaping and vast Station Areas are along the South Corridor. This parking areas, which increases the amount of storm- plan area sits upon a natural north-south ridge and water run-off. The established residential areas have does not have any sensitive features. Kings Branch tree lined streets and a mature tree canopy. Creek borders the west side of the plan area and Little Sugar Creek borders the east side of the plan area. Issues/Opportunities: There are SWIM buffers and floodplain areas, which Currently, the core plan area along South Boulevard is should be considered and protected when develop- populated with industrial and business type parcels. This ing. Topography is relatively gentle with some steeper area lacks a tree canopy and/or landscaping, which results slopes in the plan area. in a higher amount of stormwater run-off. As this area redevelops, there will be an opportunity to improve the quality of the environment by planting additional trees, landscaping, and creating open spaces.

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 39 Land Use and Design Industrial Industrial uses in the plan area are primarily west of the rail corridor. The large Lance, Inc. snack facil- ity is immediately adjacent to the Sharon Road West station. Other industrial sites include warehouse and distribution facilities on Sweden, Denmark, and Crump Roads, Stockholm Court, England and Hebron Streets, and on Lance Drive. There is also a large self-storage business located on Crump Road south of the Sharon Road West station. Most industrial buildings in the station area have been built within the last twenty years, with a few exceptions dating to the 1960’s. They are generally The Lance snack facility is the largest industrial use in the well built and utilitarian in design, either of masonry plan area. or metal construction. Most appear to be well-main- tained.

Commercial Automobile dealerships are the predominant com- mercial use, with several lining the east side of South Boulevard along its length within the plan area. Another major commercial use is the 83-acre Carolina Pavillion Shopping Center, immediately across South Boulevard from the entrance to the I-485 light rail station. Fast food restaurants are also found in abun- dance on South Boulevard near the I-485 station. Commercial signage on South Boulevard is generally large and automobile-oriented. This auto dealership on South Boulevard is typical of the plan area’s commercial uses.

Residential There are several established single and multi-family residential neighborhoods throughout the station area. The multi-family developments are both north and south of Sharon Road West, comprised of two and three story townhouse-style wood frame build- ings, at densities of up to 17 dwellings per acre. These multi-family developments are generally well-main- tained and landscaped. Most of them are outside the half-mile walking distance of the Sharon Road West station.

The Aspen Peaks development on Sharon Road West is a typical area multi-family development. Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 40 The station area’s single family neighborhoods are located on Sharonbrook Drive, Longleaf Drive, and Loblolly Lane east of South Boulevard, and off China Grove Church Road to the west of South Boulevard. Most single-family homes are of modest size and typi- cally date to either the 1960’s or the 1990’s, at 4 to 8 dwellings per acre. These neighborhoods are charac- terized by mature trees.

Civic There are two churches in the plan area. Two schools are located within the plan area. The Elon Homes property includes the Kennedy Charter Public School, located on Sharon Road West about one-half mile east of the light rail station. The Sterling Paideia Longleaf Drive and Loblolly Lane. Elementary School (Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools) is located on China Grove Church Road and is also adjacent to the I-485 light rail station. There are no post offices, public libraries, fire stations, or police substations within the plan area boundary. There are two large day care facilities within walking distance of the I-485 station. There are no active public recre- ation uses in the station area.

Issues/Opportunities: Pedestrian access between these transit stations and nearby commercial and residential areas is better than in some station areas to the north. This is partially attributable to the pedestrian bridge that was constructed across the Norfolk Southern railroad tracks connecting the Sharon The Sterling Paideia Elementary School is adjacent to the Road West station with South Boulevard. Another pedes- I-485 light rail station. trian connection was established between the I-485 station and the Sterling neighborhood off China Grove Church Road.

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 41 Sharon and I-485 Existing Land Use

T Transit Station and Line Sweden Rd Heb ron St

Sh aron L a k e

s

R d

S T ha ron R oad West

d Blv use gho stin We

S

o u t T h

B

l v

d

I-485

N

W E

S

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p e than ma 0 750 1,500 Date: September 22, 2008 feet Issues/Opportunities: Most uses in the plan have an automobile-oriented Existing Land Use Acreage % of Total design, generally considered incompatible with transit Single Family - Detached 99.1 8.0 oriented development. Multi-Family 320.4 26.0 Multi-family housing is a desirable use in a transit station Retail 182.0 14.8 area. Existing multi-family residential properties close to Office 17.6 1.4 both stations are mostly less dense than optimal. Warehouse/Distribution 97.6 7.9 Industrial 160.6 13.0 Industrial/warehouse uses are heavily present close to the Institutional 85.7 7.0 Sharon Road West Station. These uses are typically not very transit supportive, unless they have a significant Utility 0.5 0.0 number of employees. However, they represent significant Open Space 31.0 2.5 investments and economic benefits to the community. Vacant 238.0 19.3 Total 1,232.5 100.0

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 42 Southwest District Plan (1991) and Sharon & I-485 Adopted Land Use - South District Plan (1993) Adopted Land Use

Sweden Rd Single Family <= 3 DUA Heb ron St Multi-Family

Multi-Family <= 8 DUA

Sh Multi-Family <= 17 DUA aron L a k e Institutional s

R d Retail

Warehouse/Distribution Southwest Industrial District Sh Industrial - Light T ar Plan on R d Wes Park/Open Space (1991) t Greenway Transit Oriented - Mixed

T Transit Station and Line d Blv use gho stin We Adopted Future Land Use Prior to adoption of this plan, the Charlotte S o u t City Council adopted T h

B

l South District Plan v d (1993) that served as the governing land use I-485 policy for most of this area. While the district South plan recognized the possibility of a future District N

W E

Plan

light rail, it did not

S

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p recommend the higher e than ma (1993) 0 750 1,500 density uses typically Date: September 29, 2008 feet associated with transit- oriented development. The Southwest District Plan Upon adoption, the Sharon & I-485 Station Area Plan (1993) covered a very small portion of the plan area becomes the governing land use policy document for at Westinghouse Boulevard and I-485. properties within the plan boundaries. This plan rein- forces some of the recommendations made in previ- The district plans recommend maintaining the large ous planning efforts, but also encourages a balanced industrial area along South Boulevard in the Sharon mix of compact, pedestrian-friendly, transit oriented Road West vicinity. The South District Plan recom- developments. These changes are discussed in the Land mends preserving existing multi-family residential Use Recommendations section of this document. uses, primarily along Sharon Lakes Road and Sharon Road West. Single family neighborhoods are rec- Issues/Opportunities: ommended along Longleaf Drive and along China In general, the land use pattern in the plan area is sub- Grove Church Road. Retail uses are recommended urban in nature, resulting in primarily automobile-ori- along portions of South Boulevard near the Sharon ented development. This plan provides the opportunity Road West Station and closer to I-485. Institutional to promote a higher intensity, compact and pedestrian- uses, including the Kennedy Charter School, Sterling oriented development that is typically associated with Elementary and the China Grove AME Zion Church, transit oriented development. are also recognized. Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 43 Sharon & I-485 Existing Zoning

Zoning Percent B-2 Category Acreage of Total Sweden Rd B-D(CD) R-4 Single Family 104.3 8.5 Heb ron St Multi-Family 447.4 36.3 I-2 Business 75.1 6.1 I-2 Commercial 111.4 9.0 Center I-2 Sh R-17MF Business- 4.6 0.4 aron L a Distribution k e Industrial - 109.2 8.9 s

B-2

TOD-M(O) R Light d Industrial - 361.8 29.3 R-4 Heavy R-17MF Transit- 18.9 1.5 B-2(CD) Oriented Total 1,232.7 100.0 TOD-M B-2 R-17MF S T ha T Transit Station and Line ron R B-D st I-1(CD) I-2 oad We I-2

I-1

R-17MF R-17MF B-2(CD) I-2 B-2(CD) lvd e B R-17MF s B-2 hou ting R-12MF I-1 Wes I-2 I-2 I-1 B-2 R-17 R-17 I-1 R-4 R-4 B-2 MF R-17 MF B-1 MF

I-1(CD) S

o I-1(CD) u TOD-M R-8(CD) t R-4 h T

B TOD-M l v

d CC R-4 B-1

R-4 I-485 R-4

B-2 R-17MF

R-17MF(CD) N

R-8MF(CD) W E

S

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... R-4 . m s. or p e than ma 0 750 1,500 Date: September 29, 2008 feet Existing Zoning In general, zoning for these station areas reflects exist- Issues/Opportunities: ing development patterns, with industrial, business or Development patterns under existing industrial and commercial center zoning along both sides of South business zoning typically will not meet the intensity, use Boulevard. Industrially zoned land dominates the west and community design guidelines for transit oriented side of South Boulevard near the Sharon Station, and development. multi-family dominates the east side of that station area. Multi-family zoning is also concentrated along To protect single family residential areas, the opportunity both sides of Sharon Road West. It should be noted exists to recognize the single family neighborhood along that both the existing land use and the adopted future Longleaf Drive. This will align existing use with the use for the neighborhood along Longleaf Drive is future adopted land use. single family detached, not multi-family for which it is zoned. Single family zoning at a density of R-4 is concentrated along China Grove Church Road, along with some multi-family at varying densities. Retail development, primarily Carolina Pavilion, is located across South Boulevard, east of the I-485 station. Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 44 Established Neighborhoods Sweden Rd H ebr The Sharon & I-485 plan area includes significant on St portions of three established neighborhood areas: Sterling, Sharonbrook, and Pine Valley. The Charlotte Sha ron L Neighborhood Quality of Life Study (2008) catego- a

k e

s rizes all three neighborhoods within a single Sterling

R

d Neighborhood Statistical Area. The Sterling area is categorized as “Transitioning,” based on variables such Sh T aron est as social well being, crime, physical characteristics and Rd W economic vitality. Sharonbrook Blvd Neighborhood use Issues/Opportunities gho stin We The single family neighborhoods are woven within the Sterling larger plan area, rather than abutting the edge as in Neighborhood Pine Valley other plan areas. All three single family neighborhoods Neighborhood can benefit from transit oriented development planned T South Blvd along the rail corridor, but it will be important to protect the neighborhoods from intrusion. I-485

N Land Use Accessibility Index W E S Land use accessibility is often described as the con- 0 750 1,500 feet venience or ease of reaching activities and destina- tions, particularly schools, shopping, parks and public transit. As seen from the data below, the residents of the plan area have much better access to shopping and transit than residents of Charlotte overall. However, they are less likely to be near a school, park, or green- way than residents of the City overall. For example, 100% of plan area residents are ¼ mile or less from Median Household Income local transit routes, whereas only 57% of City residents overall are so close. Also, 93% of plan area residents $46,064 are within ¼ mile from a shopping area, whereas only 53% of City residents are that close. Issues/Opportunities: $47,670 Potential development around the station area will be well served by shopping and transit. Expanded park and Average House Value greenway facilities would serve to improve the accessibil- ity characteristics of present and future land uses in the $75,731 plan area.

100% 93% $207,627

53% 57% Percent Homeowners

39% 12% 16% 3% 0%

Within 1/4 Within 1/4 Within 1/4 Within 1/4 mile mile of mile of mile of of a local bus 55% Shopping Schools Parks Transit Route Sharon & I-485 Population Charlotte Population

Sterling, Sharonbrook & Pine Valley Charlotte Source: 2008 Charlotte Neighborhood Quality of Life Study Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 45

Sweden Rd Sweden Rd H ebr Heb on St ron St

TOD-M(O) Sha Sha ron ron L #04-099 L a a

k k

e

e

s

s

R R

d d

Sh T T aron R d West

Blvd Blvd South Blvd use use gho gho stin stin We We TOD-M #04-098

South Bv

T T

I-485 TOD-M I-485 #05-069

N N

W E W E

S S 0 750 1,500 0 750 1,500 feet feet

Vacant or Underdeveloped Building Permits, 2004-08 1/4 Mile 1/2 Mile T Transit Station Walk Distance Walk Distance and Line Recent Rezoning (Since 2004) T Transit Station & Line Development Activity / Potential Opportunities ½ and ¼ Walk Distance Rezonings: Since 2004, there have been 3 rezoning Both station areas include land within the ½ mile petitions approved in the plan area. Two were TOD-M walk (typically 10 minutes) on the west side of the rezonings filed by CATS for the station park and ride Norfolk Southern Railroad tracks. The tracks inhibit facilities. One TOD-M rezoning was filed by a private access from the stations eastward. The Sharon Station developer for a 79-acre multi-family development on includes a pedestrian bridge leading from the station Westinghouse Boulevard west of the Sterling neigh- platform to South Boulevard. From there, the ¼ and borhood. This rezoning has not been carried forward ½ mile walk distance extends into industrial/ employ- or approved to date. ment areas. For both the Sharon and I-485 stations, crossing several lanes of traffic along South Boulevard Building Permits: There have been 59 building is a barrier to pedestrian activity. permits issued in the plan area since 2004, both residential and non-residential. This includes con- Issues/Opportunities: struction permits for several major business and insti- There is an opportunity to expand the area within the ¼ tutional properties, but consists mostly of permits for and ½ mile walk distance by adding additional street individual homes. network and pedestrian connections. Vacant and Underutilized Land: The plan area has The biggest obstacle to extending the street network and 344 acres of land that is either vacant or underdevel- pedestrian connections at the both the Sharon and I-485 oped. These are highlighted in the above map. Some stations is the existing freight track which runs parallel to of these parcels are developed with older retail and/ the light rail track and blocks access to South Boulevard. or industrial buildings, and the opportunity exists for redevelopment at a higher density. The ¼ and ½ mile walk distance extends into some resi- dential neighborhoods which could encourage commuter Issues/Opportunities: use. Vacant and underdeveloped land around the station provides an opportunity to improve the mixture of land uses in the plan area. However, the Norfolk Southern Railroad line hampers the transit oriented development potential east of the rail line, and hampers access from South Boulevard to property west of the rail line. Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 46 Sharon & I-485 Large Parcel Ownership

Large Parcel Ownership Non-Profit Sweden Rd Heb Public ron St Private S ha ro n

Transit Station L T a k and Line e s Rd

T Shar t Wes on Road

d Blv use gho stin We

S

o ut

h

B

l v d T

I-485

N

W E

S

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p e than ma 0 750 1,500 Date: September 29, 2008 feet

Large Parcel Ownership Issues/Opportunities: While some of the study area consists of small parcels The large parcels within the study area have the potential in individual ownership, there are major concentra- of accommodating higher density transit oriented devel- tions in consolidated ownership. The above map opment uses with less assemblage than would be necessary shows such larger holdings as indicated by tax records, with smaller holdings. whether consisting of a single parcel or of a number of smaller adjacent parcels. The larger holdings include some public and non-profit owners with specific purposes, such as Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. However, as indicated on the map, there is a consid- erable amount of property in larger blocks along the corridor that is privately owned.

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 47 Market Research and Development Projections: I-485/South Boulevard: In early 2003, Robert Charles Lessor & Company The Robert Charles Lessor market study did not completed a market study of the future South Corridor examine the market potential for the I-485 station. light rail station areas entitled Station Area Allocations However, an examination of the site reveals differing for New Office Retail and Multi-family Development conditions and opportunities for development within along the South LRT Line 2000-2025. It included the station area. analysis of the Sharon Road West Station, but did not directly address the I-485/South Boulevard station. • The station area itself is truncated to the south by I-485 which acts as a pedestrian barrier and will Sharon Road West: limit extension of transit oriented development The study noted that the Sharon station area has the beyond. The area immediately to the south of the lowest density development of any of the station areas, station would require a coordinated acquisition due in part to poor east-west connections in the area. strategy for numerous small properties and signifi- It described the following factors impacting transit- cant reconfiguring of the access to and from the supportive development in the plan area: park and ride deck. • The area to the east of the station is occupied by a 1. Difficulty accessing the station either by large automobile oriented retail center with a large car due to poor north – south connectors parking lot. Given the relatively young age of the or by foot with a hostile pedestrian envi- retail center, the high and stable occupancy rate, ronment characterizing the area. the very high volumes of traffic and its regional 2. No sense of place or location as scattered serving location, the likelihood of full redevelop- low density uses such as automobile deal- ment of this site in the next 20-30 years is quite erships occupy a large portion of land. low. A redevelopment of the center for higher density uses likely would be phased with structured 3. Large industrial uses around the station parking and strategic relocation of retail anchors. have no relationship or connection to the station to facilitate usage. • The area immediately to the west of the station is defined by an elementary school and single family During the construction of the LYNX Blue Line, a detached homes, which have been identified for pedestrian bridge was constructed to facilitate pedes- neighborhood preservation. Immediately to the trian access from east of South Boulevard as recom- west of the neighborhood is a series of large parcels mended by the market study. that could be developed into residential, although these are separated from the station by low density The report suggests a modest amount of locally serving residential. retail and office could be supported in the area with • The area to the north of the station is defined the potential of mid or high rise office feasible only by institutional and industrial uses with limited near the end of the study horizon in 2025. This con- growth potential on existing small parcels. clusion is based upon the long term likelihood that the industrial uses will remain on the west side of the alignment and that the low density uses like car deal- Issues/Opportunities: erships will remain as the housing market stabilizes. Overall, the area is characterized by limited opportuni- ties in the short to medium time horizon, due primarily At the time of the study in January 2003, the eco- to existing long term uses that will not make economic nomic downturn of 2008 and higher energy costs had sense to remove and replace, and due to challenges around not yet materialized. However, Robert Charles Lessor parcel assembly. The area likely will be influenced most & Company produced the following projections up by CATS activity related to park and ride expansion and to 2025 for new office and residential development in efforts to make those expansions more TOD friendly. the Sharon station area, assuming a proactive role by local government in promoting station area develop- ment and continuation of economic trends over the longer term: • 70,000 square feet of new office space • 2,100 new multifamily residential units • 25,000 square feet of retail.

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 48

Transportation Sweden Rd He bron S The Existing Street Network t

The number of route choices available to pedestrians, Sha ron 12,400 L

bicyclists and motorists describes the adequacy of an a

k

e

12,400 s

area’s street network. A dense, well-connected network R offers greater choices of routes and more direct routes d to destinations than does a less connected network, 35,400 Sh T aron st and therefore provides greater overall system capac- Rd We ity. 38,800 1,200 Blvd use Route choices are measured by the number of lane- gho stin We miles of streets, number of intersections (nodes), South Blvd 100 number of blocks (links), and the connectivity index. 16,700 A lane-mile is one mile of a single roadway lane. The more lane-miles of streets there are, the greater the overall traffic carrying capacity. The connectivity T 7,600 index quantifies how well a roadway network con- nects destinations and is calculated by dividing the I-485 8,100

number of roadway links by the number of roadway N W E

nodes. A connectivity index of 1.45 or more is desir- S able for transit station areas. 0 750 1,500 feet Sharon Road West and South Blvd./I-485Stations Area Traffic Counts: Average daily volume Year of Count Speed Limits Area size (square miles) 2.18 25 T Transit Station 2002 and Line 2004 30 Miles of streets: 17.1 2006 35 45 Lane-mile of streets: 33.3 65 Connectivity Index: 1.08

Issues/Opportunities: There is a noticeable lack of street connectivity from the residential areas in the eastern part of the plan area to South Boulevard. As commercial properties redevelop along the east side of this thoroughfare, there will be opportunities to provide a more robust street network that better links people and places. There are several apartment communities along Sharon Road West and Sharon Lakes Road that have only one entrance. As these redevelop, there will be opportunities to provide more connections between developments and adjoining neighborhoods. There is also a noticeable lack of street connectivity on either side of China Grove Church Road. As these prop- erties redevelop, a new grid should emerge, enhancing connectivity to the station, as well as facilitating greater route choices within the neighborhood.

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 49 Local Streets: The remaining roadways are local streets Sweden Rd Heb that carry low traffic volumes, have slow operating ron St England St speeds and provide access to individual properties.

Sha ron L Interstate Highway a

k e

s encircles Charlotte as an outerbelt.

R

d Within Charlotte, I-485 connects Interstates 85 and 77, as well as US 74 (Independence Boulevard), or all T Rd We aron st five radial expressway corridors connecting Charlotte’s Sh central business district with its outer reaches. Within the Sharon & I-485 plan area, I-485 serves as the Crump Rd lvd e B southern study boundary and has a partial cloverleaf ous tingh Wes at South Boulevard. d R

h C

South Blvd e

v

ro I-485

a G a T

n

i

h C

N

W E

S 0 750 1,500 feet

Freeway Ramp Minor Thoroughfare Local Street Major Thoroughfare Minor Collector Freeway

Major Collector T Transit Station and Line

The Thoroughfare Plan The Mecklenburg-Union Thoroughfare Plan is the adopted major roadway plan for Mecklenburg and Union counties and is used to assure that the most appropriate street system is developed to meet exist- ing and future travel needs. Streets are classified and designed according to their intended functions so that land use and traffic conflicts are minimized. The street classifications applicable to the Sharon & I-485 plan area are as follows: Thoroughfares: South Boulevard, Westinghouse Boulevard, and Sharon Road West are major thor- oughfares. Hebron Street is a minor thoroughfare. As thoroughfares, these streets are designed to accommo- date large volumes of traffic at moderate speeds and provide access to major commercial and residential land uses. Collectors: Sharon Lakes Road, Sweden Road, England Street, and Crump Road are major collec- tors. China Grove Road is a minor collector street. Collector streets carry traffic between the thorough- fares and local streets at moderate volumes and speeds South Boulevard, within the plan area, has wide travel lanes and providing access to adjacent land uses. and a median with left turn lanes. Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 50 Street Classifications Streetscape and Typical Sections

South Sharon Road Boulevard West looking looking north towards South towards Boulevard Longleaf Drive

South Boulevard is generally four travel lanes wide with turn Sharon Road West is four travel lanes wide. Sidewalks are gen- lanes added at its signalized intersections. Sidewalks are generally erally located on both sides of the street, but back of curb, lacking located only along the east side of the street north of Westinghouse any planting strip. Street lighting is provided on utility poles. Boulevard; south of Westinghouse Boulevard, there are sidewalks on both sides with some gaps. Sidewalks are sometimes separated from travel lanes by narrow planting strips, lacking street trees. Street lighting is provided on utility poles.

Hebron Street Sharon Lakes looking east Road looking towards east towards El Denmark Road Verano Circle

Hebron Street is two travel lanes wide. Sidewalks are generally Sharon Lakes Road is two travel lanes wide with bicycle lanes located on one side of the street, separated by a planting strip. Street and dedicated left-turn lanes in places. Sidewalks are located on lighting is provided on utility poles. both sides of the street near South Boulevard, but generally on one side through most of its length, Sidewalks are often separated from travel lanes by planting strips, albeit fairly narrow in places. Street lighting is provided on utility poles.

Crump Road China Grove West looking Road looking south from the north from Lance Plant the Sterling entrance Elementary entrance

Crump Road is two travel lanes wide, with dedicated left-turn China Grove Road is a collector street with two travel lanes. lanes in places. Sidewalks are located only on the west side of the Back-of-curb sidewalks are generally located on both sides of the street south of the Sharon Road West station. Sidewalks were not street, lacking any separation from the street by a planting strip. included on the vehicular bridge built over LYNX and the Norfolk Southern freight lines because a separate pedestrian bridge provides Street lighting is provided on utility poles. access to the station. Street lighting is provided on widely spaced poles. Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 51 Avenues: Sharon Lakes Road, Sweden Road, England Sweden Rd Heb Street, Hebron Street, Crump Road and China Grove ron St England St Church Road function closest to Avenues. Avenues are intended to serve a diverse set of functions in a Sha ron L wide variety of land uses and should be designed to a

k e

s provide a balance of service for all transportation

R

d modes. Avenues provide an important mobility func- tion for motorists, but are expected to provide a high T Rd We aron st level of comfort, safety and convenience to pedestrians Sh and bicyclists. Avenues are generally limited to four or fewer travel lanes (except at major intersections) lvd e B with block lengths up to 600 feet. Common elements ous tingh Crump Rd Wes should include sidewalks, planting strips or amenity d R zones with street trees, and bicycle lanes. h C South Blvd e v

o

r I-485 Locals: The majority of roadways are local residential

a G a T n

i and local commercial streets that provide direct access h C to residential and commercial properties. These streets are intended to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists by providing sidewalks, planting strips with N W E trees and low speed limits. S 0 750 1,500 feet Issues/Opportunities: South Boulevard has important regional mobility needs Avenue T Transit Station reinforcing its Boulevard character. While transit-spurred Boulevard and Line redevelopment may achieve an Avenue vision in station Not Classified area plans to the north, South Boulevard will continue to function closest to a Boulevard in the Sharon & I-485 Street Typology: Urban Street Design Guidelines plan area. Though active ground-floor uses will naturally The Urban Street Design Guidelines recommend how gravitate away from a Boulevard, redevelopment should Charlotte’s streets should be planned and designed to still advance a future cross-section for South Boulevard provide viable transportation choices. The guidelines that increases the safety and comfort of all users, espe- are intended to ensure the street design process con- cially pedestrians. siders the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and motor- ists, as well as the effects on adjacent land uses. Streets Sharon Road West is classified as a Boulevard, but should are classified according to land use and transporta- function more appropriately as an Avenue, better serving tion contexts and should be designed accordingly. the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists as well as motor- Regardless of their classification, a number of streets ists. in the study area fail to consistently provide the street elements or element dimensions desired. Regardless of their classification, a number of streets in the plan area fail to consistently provide the street ele- Streets in the area fall into the following categories: ments or element dimensions desired in an urban envi- ronment. While new streets will be built to provide the Boulevards: Within the context of the street design desired features, deficiencies on existing streets can be guidelines, South Boulevard, Sharon Road West, and addressed when adjacent properties redevelop. Westinghouse Boulevard are classified as Boulevards. Boulevards are intended to move large numbers of vehicles, often as “through traffic,” from one part of the city to another, and to other lower level streets in the network. Though principally focused on motor vehicles, Boulevards still should accommodate pedes- trians and cyclists as safely and comfortably as pos- sible. Common elements should include sidewalks, planting strips with street trees, and bicycle lanes.

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 52 Sharon & I-485 Pedestrian & Bike Facilities

Pedestrian & Bike

Facilities Sweden Rd Heb Stockholm Partial Sidewalk ron St

EnglandCt St Complete Sidewalk

d

Existing Bike Lane R Sharon

ord L

a F

T Transit Station k

e s s

and Line n

o R

i

t

d

a N

ld O

Maggie LnS T ha ron R o est r ad W Regent D Park Ln

k r

r o

D o D

r k

s B l o

o ia n r r o r B e d t a n R h a o p r

S a M

lvd m h n B u e r S

a ous

h C ressid lc a g C Dr tin

u es V W

d R f Dr h ea c Longl r u L h o C b e l v o o ll e r y Lan G

S

a

n o i

u h t C T h Ln Ervin B l v

d

I-485

N

W E

S

GIS GIS

. Charlotte ...... m s. or p e than ma 0 750 1,500 Date: November 5, 2008 feet

Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities Pedestrian System: Of the approximate 17 miles of Issues/Opportunities: streets in the Sharon & I-485 plan area, 17% have More streets that connect to South Boulevard and Sharon sidewalks on both sides of the street, 21% have side- Road West are needed to provide better pedestrian and walk on one side and 39% have no sidewalk. These bicycle mobility in the plan area. The current large block figures include sidewalks recently built by the South sizes along these streets discourage these alternative forms Corridor Infrastructure Program (SCIP) along several of travel, especially pedestrian travel. key local streets that are along or connect to South Boulevard, Sharon Road West, and Sharon Lakes Road. Better north-south pedestrian and bicycle routes are Additionally, the intersections of South Boulevard needed parallel to South Boulevard, as well as better with Sharon Road West and Carolina Pavilion Drive east-west routes parallel to Sharon Road West. The North now have some pedestrian enhancements. opportunity to build these routes will come as commer- cial properties redevelop along South Boulevard, and as Bicycle System: As part of SCIP, bicycle lanes were apartment properties redevelop along Sharon Road West added to Sharon Lakes Road. and Sharon Lakes Road.

Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 53 Level Of Service Level of Service (LOS) measures the quality of service Sweden Rd provided by a transportation facility to its users. The 1 City of Charlotte evaluates level of service for pedes- Hebron St Sha ron trians, bicyclists and motorists and uses the results to L a

2 k

e

help balance their competing needs when planning s

R and designing streets. Levels of service range from 3 d

d

A through F, with desirable levels of service based R

p S T har on the street typologies of the Urban Street Design m o 5 n u R r oad West Guidelines. Transit station areas are intended to be C highly accessible for pedestrians and bicyclists, and 4 therefore should have good pedestrian and bicycle lvd se B 6 ou Cressida ingh 7 level of service (A to B). Lower levels of service for est Dr motorists are acceptable if necessary to achieve the W South Blvd desired pedestrian and bicycle levels of service. 8 I-485 Carolina Pedestrian and bicycle level of service is rated accord- T Pavilion Dr N ing to the level of comfort and safety offered by the Carolina design features at signalized intersections, while motor Pavilion Dr S vehicle level of service is based on motorist delays. 9 N Motor vehicle quality of service is also measured by W E S the volume to capacity ratio (v/c), which describes 0 750 1,500 an intersection’s ability to process traffic within peak feet time periods. Values greater than .95 suggest an inter- section is near its capacity during this time period and Existing signalized intersection T Transit Station and Line that motorists may experience substantial congestion. sections, with the exception of Crump Road, given Existing traffic conditions in the Sharon & I-485 the separate dedicated pedestrian bridge serving the plan area are generally satisfactory. South Boulevard, Sharon Road West station. Westinghouse Boulevard, and Sharon Road West have adequate capacity. Motorists do not typically experi- Issues/Opportunities: ence excessive delays or stops at most intersections. While vehicle level of service and travel times are gener- Traffic conditions are expected to worsen, however, as ally good in the Sharon & I-485 area, expected growth station area land uses intensify and traffic volumes in and intensified development in the future will likely the South Boulevard corridor continue to grow. result in increased congestion on existing streets. Without a more extensive street network, motorists will experience Several pedestrian crossings were recently improved longer delays and travel times as more people are forced to at multiple intersections, thanks to work done by the travel on the few through-streets that serve the area, such light rail project and SCIP. Not surprisingly, failing as South Boulevard, Sharon Road West, Westinghouse intersections in terms of Pedestrian Level of Service Boulevard, Hebron Street, and Sharon Lakes Road. An are those that were not recently improved. Pedestrian improved street grid will aid motorists, pedestrians and crossing enhancements are still desirable at these inter- bicyclists by providing more routes to travel destinations.

L E V E L O F S E R V I C E (LOS) for Year 2007 Signalized Intersection Pedestrian Bike Vehicular Volume to Capacity Volume to Capacity Ratio AM Peak Ratio PM Peak 1 Sharon Lakes Rd./Sweden Rd. & South Bv. C E .64 D .81 D LOS Rating Scale 2 Hebron St. & South Bv. C- E .68 B .91 D A Excellent 3 Crump Rd. & South Bv. D E .59 A .67 A B Very Good 4 Sharon Rd. West & South Bv. B E .71 D .82 C 5 Sharon Rd. West & Sharon Lakes Rd. D E .69 C .67 C C Good 6 Cresida Dr./Westinghouse Bv. & South Bv. E+ E- .68 D .67 D D Fair 7 Crump Rd. & Westinghouse Bv. D- E .35 B .35 B E Poor 8 South Bv. & I-485 Station/Pavilion (North) C E .51 B .61 C F Failure 9 South Bv. & Pavilion Dwy (South) E- E .71 B .75 C

Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 54 Public Transportation Sweden Rd H Charlotte Area Transit (CATS) offers public transpor- ebro tation service in and through the Sharon & I-485 area n St with a combination of light rail vehicles and buses. 44 Sha ron L a

k e

Light Rail Service: The light rail line runs just west s

R

of and parallel to South Boulevard within the Sharon d & I-485 plan area. Light rail patrons are able to access Sh aron T st 43 the line at either the Sharon Road West or I-485/ Rd We South Boulevard stations. A 190-space surface lot 19 is sited west of the Sharon Road West station, with

access off Crump Road. A 1,100-space parking deck d Blv use 55 gho sits immediately west of the I-485/South Boulevard stin station, with access from South Boulevard opposite We 12

Carolina Pavilion Drive North. Light rail service was South Blvd projected to carry 9,100 passengers per day, but thus far has been averaging over 16,900 as of July 2008. T Both park-and-ride facilities are filled to capacity I-485 daily by early morning. 58

N Bus Service: In coordination with the late 2007 W E S 42 opening of light-rail service in the South Corridor, 0 750 1,500 CATS restructured area bus service to improve con- feet nections with light-rail stations. Currently, CATS provides bus service in the Sharon & I-485 area with Route 12 Route 43 Route 58 six local bus routes: Route 19 Route 44 T Transit Station • Route 12 mostly follows South Boulevard Route 42 Route 55 and Line from Carolina Pavilion to Woodlawn Road. • Route 19 runs along Sharon Road West and Park Road between the Sharon Road West Freight Railroad station and Uptown via South Park. Norfolk Southern is a major Class I railroad. The • Route 42 runs between the I-485 station and Norfolk Southern network extends over 20,000 miles via Pineville. over 22 states, the District of Columbia and Ontario. • Route 43 runs along Sharon Road West and Within the Sharon & I-485 area, Norfolk Southern Johnston Road between the Sharon Road owns and operates a mainline freight track along the West station and Ballantyne. east side of the LYNX Blue Line, running west of and parallel to South Boulevard. The freight railroad • Route 55 runs along Westinghouse Boulevard crosses at-grade alongside LYNX at Sweden Road and between Sharon Road West station and Steele Hebron Street, but both the parallel-running freight Creek. and LYNX lines cross beneath a bridge carrying • Route 58 runs between the I-485 station and Westinghouse Boulevard. via Pineville. Issues/Opportunities: Annual ridership numbers based on Fiscal Year 2007 The location of the freight railroad immediately west of were 795,595 for Route 12 and 410,773 for Route South Boulevard greatly inhibits the creation of addi- 19, although these figures are prior to the major bus tional street connections from South Boulevard, and re-routings implemented with the start of light-rail limits visibility of any redevelopment on the west side of service. Routes 42, 43, 55, and 58 are completely new South Boulevard. Conversion of the private connection routes. to the I-485 station to a public street would help parts of the Sterling neighborhood closest to the station to have Issues/Opportunities: public street access to South Boulevard. Both Sharon Road West and I-485/South Boulevard stations need additional parking. While CATS owns additional land at the latter terminus, conditions at the Sharon Road West station are constrained physically. Sharon & I-485 Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS 55 Infrastructure/Public Facilities Sweden Rd Heb Education ron St There is one Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (CMS) Sha facility in the plan area. Sterling Elementary School ron L a k

is at the I-485 station. The multi-story parking deck e s

R

used by CATS riders has been built to allow the top d to be used by the school as a play field. CMS has Sh T aron identified a need for future middle and high schools R within the larger area. d West

The Kennedy Charter Public School, serving grades Blvd South Blvd use gho stin 6-12, is located on Sharon Road West about one-half We mile east of the light rail station. Central Piedmont Community College has no facilities within the plan area. However, the Harper T Little campus is located at Hebron and Nations Ford Roads, Sugar I-485 Creek approximately 1.5 miles from the Sharon Road West Greenway station. A classroom and lab expansion is scheduled

N for completion by January 2010. W E

S 0 750 1,500 Issues/Opportunities feet CMS currently has an elementary school within I-485 station area and is targeting more schools nearby. A high Utilities - Sanitary Sewer Rehab T Transit Station school served by light rail could deliver students in an and Line extremely efficient manner.

Parks, Public Libraries, Police, and Fire Water and Sewer and Storm Water Management Mecklenburg County Park and Recreation is devel- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utilities Department (CMU) oping the Little Sugar Creek Greenway along the has identified water and sewer needs during the origi- eastern border of the plan area. In addition, a parcel nal South Corridor study. Based on flow monitoring on Longleaf Drive is under development for a neigh- of the Kings Branch trunk sewer, it was determined borhood park. An additional Kings Branch park/ that the line had some issues during rain events. greenway site on Westinghouse Boulevard at the western edge of the plan area has been acquired for CMU also has identified the need to close the gap in future development. the 12-inch water main along Westinghouse Boulevard between I-485 and Culp Street. If the Lance and/or Public Libraries of Charlotte-Mecklenburg County other nearby sites redevelop at high densities in the currently has no facilities in the plan area. A new future, a larger water main from either Arrowood or branch is under discussion for Sharon Road West Nations Ford would ensure sufficient water service in adjacent to the Little Sugar Creek Greenway, just the station areas. east of the plan area. Issues/Opportunities: Police have no physical facilities in the station area, Increased density will allow CMU to serve a larger but oversee CATS Transit Police, and provide service number of customers per square mile compared to a more through the Steele Creek Division. suburban setting. There are no fire stations located in the plan area, but Redevelopment should address the quality of storm water Fire Station 20 is just to the west at Nations Ford run-off. Future development would have to meet more Road and Hebron Street. stringent requirements than existing development. Issues/Opportunities: . Service facilities outside the station areas may be ade- quate to serve the areas. In many cases public services can be provided to densely developed areas with fewer resources. Sharon & I-485Transit Station Area Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

www.charlotteplanning.org 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202-2853 PH: 704-336-2205 FAX: 704-336-5123