East Kilbride Area Committee

Council Offices, Almada Street Hamilton, ML3 0AA

Dear Councillor

The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the above Committee to be held as follows:-

Date: Wednesday, 30 January 2019 Time: 14:00 Venue: Council Chamber, East Kilbride Civic Centre, Andrew Street, East Kilbride, G74 1AB

The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf.

Members are reminded to bring their fully charged tablets to the meeting

Yours sincerely

Lindsay Freeland Chief Executive

Members Archie Buchanan (Chair), Isobel Dorman (Depute Chair), John Anderson, Graeme Campbell, Gerry Convery, Margaret Cooper, Fiona Dryburgh, Joe Fagan, Geri Gray, Ian Harrow, Hugh Macdonald, Monique McAdams, Gladys Miller, Graham Scott, Collette Stevenson, Jim Wardhaugh, Sheena Wardhaugh, David Watson

1 BUSINESS

1 Declaration of Interests

2 Minutes of Previous Meeting 3 - 6 Minutes of the meeting of the East Kilbride Area Committee held on 7 November 2018 submitted for approval as a correct record. (Copy attached)

Item(s) for Decision

3 Application PM/18/1565 - Erection of Fencing (Retrospective) at 253 Glen 7 - 16 More, East Kilbride Report dated 15 January 2019 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources). (Copy attached)

Item(s) for Noting

4 Routes To Work South Presentation by Stephen Barr, Chief Executive Routes to Work South

5 South Lanarkshire Carers Network Presentation by Isobel Murray, Network Business Manager and Pauline McIntosh, Partnership and Engagement Officer, South Lanarkshire Carers Network

Item(s) for Decision

6 Community Grant Applications 17 - 20 Report dated 16 January 2019 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources). (Copy attached)

Urgent Business

7 Urgent Business Any other items of business which the Chair decides are urgent.

For further information, please contact:- Clerk Name: Stuart McLeod Clerk Telephone: 01698 454815 Clerk Email: [email protected]

EAST KILBRIDE AREA COMMITTEE 2

Minutes of meeting held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, East Kilbride on 7 November 2018

Chair: Councillor David Watson

Councillors Present: Councillor John Anderson, Councillor Archie Buchanan (Depute), Councillor Graeme Campbell, Councillor Margaret Cooper, Councillor Isobel Dorman, Councillor Fiona Dryburgh, Councillor Joe Fagan, Councillor Geri Gray, Councillor Gladys Miller, Councillor Graham Scott, Councillor Collette Stevenson, Councillor Jim Wardhaugh, Councillor Sheena Wardhaugh

Councillors' Apologies: Councillor Gerry Convery, Councillor Ian Harrow, Councillor Hugh Macdonald, Councillor Monique McAdams

Attending: Community and Enterprise Resources K Hyland, Network Team Leader; M Muir, Roads Area Manager (East Kilbride, Cambuslang and Rutherglen) Finance and Corporate Resources S McLeod, Administration Officer

Also Attending: Care and Repair in South Lanarkshire J Burgess, Manager Police Scotland Sergeant P Doyle; Superintendent R Hay; Inspector A Higgins

1 Declaration of Interests No interests were declared.

2 Minutes of Previous Meeting The minutes of the meeting of the East Kilbride Area Committee held on 29 August 2018 were submitted for approval as a correct record.

The Committee decided: that the minutes be approved as a correct record.

Councillor Gray entered the meeting after this item of business

3 Police Scotland – Presentation Superintendent B Hay and Inspector A Higgins provided details of Police Scotland’s Local Policing Plan for South Lanarkshire which contained the following priorities:-

 counter terrorism  road safety  serious organised crime and drugs  acquisitive crime  serious violent crime and public protection  anti-social behaviour and hate crime  public confidence and local engagement

Information was also provided on:-

 the broader vision of Local Outcome Improvement Plans  policing arrangements in East Kilbride and Avondale  recent highlights in the locality  policing priorities going forward

Superintendent Hay responded to members’ questions.

The Chair thanked Superintendent Hay and Inspector Higgins for their informative update.

The Committee decided: that the presentation be noted.

[Reference: Minutes of 11 October 2017 (Paragraph 4)]

Councillors Miller and Stevenson entered the meeting during this item of business

4 Care and Repair in South Lanarkshire J Burgess, Manager gave a presentation on Care and Repair in South Lanarkshire which outlined:-

 that the main purpose of Care and Repair was to assist people aged over 65 or people of any age with a disability or life limiting illness, who lived in privately owned or privately rented accommodation, with home adaptations, repairs and advice  that, in February 2017, Care and Repair had successfully tendered for a contract with the Council to deliver adaptations and a repairs and maintenance service across South Lanarkshire  current funding arrangements

Details were also provided on the following:-

 adaptations carried out  a free repairs and maintenance service  the provision of telecare, key-safes and euro cylinder locks  the Safe as Houses joint venture between Care and Repair, South Lanarkshire Council and Police Scotland to deliver free home safety and security measures and advice to eligible clients  a free small repairs service  the future aspirations of Care and Repair

J Burgess, having responded to members’ questions, was thanked for his informative presentation.

The Committee decided: that the presentation be noted.

Councillor Campbell left the meeting during this item of business

5 Roads Investment Plan – Progress Report A report dated 28 September 2018 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) was submitted on progress with roads investment activity within the East Kilbride Area Committee area.

Details were provided on the:-

 phasing of the £126 million expenditure on the Roads Investment Plan from 2008/2009 to 2018/2019  progress made in relation to the schemes within the East Kilbride Area Committee area which showed that, as at 19 September 2018, 22 schemes had been completed and 14 were in progress or programmed to be completed by the end of March 2019

The current capital investment of £12 million in the Roads Investment Plan would end in 2019 and the adequacy of future funding would be a key issue for the Council to consider.

The Roads Area Manager gave a presentation on key aspects of the Roads Investment Plan, advising that, to date, 31 schemes had been completed.

Having responded to members’ questions, the Roads Area Manager was thanked by the Chair for his informative presentation.

The Committee decided: that progress with the Roads Investment Plan within the East Kilbride Area Committee area be noted.

[Reference: Minutes of 20 December 2017 (Paragraph 5)]

6 Community Grant Applications A report dated 24 October 2018 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was submitted on applications for community grants.

The Committee decided: that community grants be awarded as follows:-

(a) Applicant: Maranatha Camp, East Kilbride (EK/33/18) Purpose of Grant: Outing Amount Awarded: £200

(b) Applicant: Strathaven Community Nursery (EK/50/18) Purpose of Grant: Administration, publicity costs, equipment and materials Amount Awarded: £300

(d) Applicant: Chapelton Indoor Bowling Club, Strathaven (EK/58/18) Purpose of Grant: Outing and entrance fees Amount Awarded: £250

(e) Applicant: St Vincent De Paul - Strathaven (EK/59/18) Purpose of Grant: Outing Amount Awarded: £200

(f) Applicant: St Bride’s Ladies’ Phoenix Club, East Kilbride (EK/60/18) Purpose of Grant: Outing and entrance fees Amount Awarded: £170

(g) Applicant: Midweek Walking Group, East Kilbride (EK/61/18) Purpose of Grant: Outing, administration and publicity costs Amount Awarded: £250 5

(h) Applicant: Stonehouse Bowling Club Ladies’ Section (EK/62/18) Purpose of Grant: Outing and entrance fees Amount Awarded: £225

(i) Applicant: Strathaven Rainbow Social Club (EK/63/18) Purpose of Grant: Specialist transport, administration and publicity costs Amount Awarded: £240

(j) Applicant: East Kilbride Trefoil Guild (EK/64/18) Purpose of Grant: Outing Amount Awarded: £95

(k) Applicant: The East Kilbride Probus Club (EK/65/18) Purpose of Grant: Outing, entrance fees and equipment Amount Awarded: £450

(l) Applicant: Stonehouse Heritage Group (EK/66/18) Purpose of Grant: Administration and publicity costs Amount Awarded: £300

(m) Applicant: Strathaven Badminton Club (EK/67/18) Purpose of Grant: Equipment Amount Awarded: £300

(n) Applicant: Stonehouse Men’s Shed (EK/69/18) Purpose of Grant: Start-up costs Amount Awarded: £250

7 Item of Urgent Business – Arrangements at the East Kilbride Remembrance Ceremony In terms of Standing Order No 4, the Chair decided that, in view of the timescales involved, this matter be dealt with as a matter of urgency.

In response to a question from Councillor Fagan, discussion took place on the protocol for Council representation at the East Kilbride Remembrance Ceremony to be held on 11 November 2018.

Councillor Cooper intimated that she would write to the Leader of the Council to express her views.

The Committee decided: that the position be noted.

6 Agenda Item

Report 3

Report to: East Kilbride Area Committee Date of Meeting: 30 January 2019 Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources)

Application no. P/18/1565 Planning proposal: Erection of Fencing (Retrospective) at 253 Glen More, East Kilbride

1 Summary application information [purpose] Application type:• Householder Applicant: • Mr J McBride Location: • 253 Glen More East Kilbride G74 2AR [1purpose] 2 Recommendation(s) 2.1 The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- [recs] (1) Grant detailed planning permission (subject to conditions) based on conditions attached. [1recs] 2.2 Other actions/notes

(1) The East Kilbride Area Committee has delegated powers to determine this application.

3 Other information ♦ Applicant’s Agent: ♦ Council Area/Ward: 08 East Kilbride Central North ♦ Policy Reference(s): South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan (2015)

Policy 4 Development Management and Placemaking Policy 6 General Urban Area/Settlements

Supplementary Guidance 3: Development Management, Placemaking and Design Policy

DM13 Development within General Urban Area/Settlement

Proposed South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2

Policy 3 General Urban Areas and Settlements Policy 5 Development Management and Placemaking

♦ Representation(s):

► 7 Objection Letters ► 0 Support Letters ► 0 Comment Letters

♦ Consultation(s):

None required

Planning Application Report

1 Application Site 1.1 The application site relates to a two storey terraced dwellinghouse at 253 Glen More in the St Leonards area of East Kilbride. The site lies within an established residential area. The property is bounded to the south by two terraced houses and to the north and east by an end terraced house. A public road, Blacklaw Drive lies to the east of the application site with a triangular area of open plan space between the site and the road.

2 Proposal(s) 2.1 The applicant seeks retrospective detailed planning permission for the erection of fencing. One section of the fence is 1.8m in height for a length of 2.1m from the front of the house and then drops to 1m in height for a further 3.7m in length. This fence has been erected along the dividing boundary between the front gardens of 253 and 255 Glen More. A 1m high timber fence has also been erected along the dividing boundary of 251 and 253 Glen More.

3 Background 3.1 Local Plan Status 3.1.1 In determining this planning application the Council must assess the proposed development against the policies contained within both the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan (SLLDP) (2015) and associated Supplementary Guidance (SG) produced in support of the SLLDP.

3.1.2 In land use terms, the application site is identified within the SLLDP as being within a general residential area. Policy 6 (General Urban Area/Settlements) is applicable and states that residential developments and those of an ancillary nature may be acceptable, provided they do not have a significant adverse effect on the amenity and character of the area. Developments that will be detrimental to residential amenity will not be permitted.

3.1.3 Policy 4 (Development Management and Placemaking) of the SLLDP is also considered to be relevant and requires all development proposals to take account of, and be integrated with, the local context and built form.

3.1.4 Policy DM13 (Development within General Urban Area/Settlements) of the Development Management, Placemaking and Design Supplementary Guidance, is also relevant to this proposal. This policy states that proposals must relate satisfactorily to the adjacent and surrounding area in terms of scale, massing and materials used.

3.1.5 On 29 May 2018 the Planning Committee approved the proposed South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (Volumes 1 and 2) and Supporting Planning Guidance on Renewable Energy. The new Plan builds on the policies and proposals contained in the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan. For the purposes of determining planning applications, the proposed South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 is now a material consideration. In this instance Policies 3 and 5 are relevant.

9 3.2 Planning Background 3.2.1 There is no recent planning history pertaining to the application site.

4 Consultation(s) 4.1 No consultations were required in respect of this application.

5 Representation(s) 5.1 Statutory neighbour notification was undertaken. Seven letters of objection were received. The issues raised are summarised below:- a) The erected fence shades light into the garden and front living room of 255 Glen More from mid-morning onwards. The loss of light will be detrimental to the health and well-being of the occupants of the property and will block their line of sight from their garden. Response: A daylight/shadowing assessment was carried out by the Planning Service to investigate the effect the development had on sunlight on the neighbouring property. This section of fence is located to the south of 255 Glen More. Measurements were taken for different periods within the year (March, June, September and December) with and without the fence. However, given the positioning of the proposed development to 255 Glen More, the proposal would not have a substantial impact on the existing level of sunlight presently enjoyed by these properties in March, June or September. Whilst it was noted that the proposed development would have an impact through shadowing in December, this impact is not considered sufficient to justify refusal of this planning application. Good practice guidance from the British Research Establishment states that as long as at least half the garden receives at least two hours sunlight on 21 March there is adequate sunlight. The proposed development would not adversely affect existing levels of sunlight for any adjoining dwellinghouse in March. The right to a view is not a material planning consideration. b) What methods and materials will the applicant use to preserve the timber from elements of decay? Given the surrounding area it will not take long for the fence to be affected with green algae and mildew. Response: The method or materials for preserving timber is not a material planning consideration. c) Planning permission was only applied for the day after the fence was erected. Response: The applicant was unaware that planning permission was required for a fence. On being advised that planning consent was required for this structure a planning application was made. d) Although the fence is within the applicant’s boundary, the posts have been concreted into part of the garden of 255 Glen More. The applicant will have to source an alternative support structure on his own boundary. Response: The land ownership certificate within the planning application form has been signed by the applicant that no person other than himself/the applicant was an owner of any part of the land to which the planning application relates. The planning application relates to the structure of the fence above the ground and it is clear that it has been erected along the dividing boundary between the two properties. The concrete supports for the fence posts below the ground are

10 not subject to control by planning and therefore do not form part of the assessment of the planning application. This is instead a legal matter that requires to be resolved between the parties involved. e) What would happen if the garden ground level of 255 Glen More was lowered thus making the fence higher than 1.8m? Response: The height of a fence is measured from the lowest part of the ground immediately adjacent to the fence. The height of the fence would therefore be measured from the level of the ground on which the fence sits and it would be measured from the applicant’s garden. However, in any event, the proposals have been determined on the basis of the situation at present. f) The fence is setting a precedent for others. None of the other local properties have a similar boundary fence. Blacklaw Drive is otherwise open plan. Response: There are many examples of garden enclosure within the general area, including a 1.8m high hedge (approximately) that is part of the objector’s front garden at 255 Glen More. Many of these enclosures are formed by bushes or small walls but there are also examples of fences to delineate individual gardens, together with steps and handrails. g) I was discouraged from erecting a fence in front of my garden as I was told it would probably be rejected as the council do not promote enclosed gardens. Response: The Council does not have a specific policy promoting open front gardens within residential developments. Each planning application is decided on its own merits. h) The fence does not keep anything in or out as it is open in the front. The highest part looks odd and the fence serves no purpose. It looks out of character. The 1.8m section of the fence should be reduced to 1m in height in line with the rest of the fence. There are no immediate plans at 255 Glen More to start works on the approved extension. Response: Planning consent (Planning Application EK/17/0165) for the erection of a single storey front extension at 255 Glen More is still live. When constructed, it will project 2m from the front elevation of the property. The character of the streetscene would therefore be altered significantly. The applicant has explained in his application form that, due to the re-location of the front door at 255 Glen More as part of this consent, the higher part of the fence has been erected to preserve privacy for both parties. It is considered that in the interests of amenity, that the retrospective fencing should be stained in an appropriate dark wood stain. i) The only reason this section of fencing has been made higher is to make it difficult to build the front extension that has been approved at 255 Glen More. Response: This is a matter that requires to be resolved between the parties involved. The grant of planning permission does not grant any right of access over any adjoining property or land required for the purpose of constructing or maintaining an approved development. The consent of the appropriate land owner is required to carry out building work or future maintenance that requires access to a neighbour's ground. Any disputes which arise over access or

11 boundaries are not a planning matter. These are civil matters to be resolved between the parties involved.

5.2 These letters have been copied and are available for inspection in the usual manner and on the planning portal.

6 Assessment and Conclusions 6.1 The applicant seeks retrospective detailed planning permission for the erection of fencing. One section of the fence is 1.8m in height for a length of 2.1m from the principal elevation of the house and then drops to 1m in height for a further 3.7m in length. This fence has been erected along the dividing boundary between the front gardens of 253 and 255 Glen More. A 1m high timber fence has also been erected along the dividing boundary of 251 and 253 Glen More.

6.2 In assessing the application, consideration must be given to the policies and guidance within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan: Policy 4 - Development Management and Placemaking, Policy 6 - General Urban Area/Settlements and within the associated Development Management, Placemaking and Design Supplementary Guidance: Policy DM13 – Development with General Urban Area/Settlements. In addition, the proposed South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 is now a material consideration and Policy 3 – General Urban Areas and Settlements and Policy 5 – Development Management and Placemaking are also required to be considered.

6.3 Policies 4 and 6 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan and Policy DM13 of the Development Management, Placemaking and Design Supplementary Guidance require all development proposals to take account of and be integrated with the local context and built form. Development proposals should have no significant adverse impacts on the amenity of the area. These requirements must also be met within Policies 3 and 5 of the proposed South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan. In assessment of these policies and the criteria applied, it is noted that there is no significant adverse impact on adjacent buildings in terms of massing, design and external materials or any loss of open space or damage to hedges or bushes. A daylight/shadowing assessment was also carried out by the Planning Service to investigate the effect the development had on sunlight. Measurements were taken for different periods within the year (March, June, September and December). However, the proposal would not have a significant adverse impact on the existing level of sunlight presently enjoyed by adjoining properties in March, June or September. Whilst it was noted that the proposed development would have an impact on sunlight to 255 Glen More in December, this is not considered sufficient reason to justify refusal of this planning application. Good practice guidance from the British Research Establishment states that as long as at least half the garden receives at least two hours sunlight on March 21 there is adequate sunlight. The proposed development would not adversely affect existing levels of sunlight for any adjoining dwellinghouse in March. The proposed development is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies 4 and 6 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan and Policy DM13 of the Development Management, Placemaking and Design Supplementary Guidance and Policies 5 and 6 of the proposed South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2.

12 6.4 Whilst it is noted that 7 letters of objection have been received in relation to this planning application, it is considered that the concerns raised, either individually or collectively, are not of sufficient weight or merit from a planning perspective that could justify the refusal of consent. It is not considered that any of the neighbouring properties would be adversely affected in terms of overshadowing/loss of daylight or that the general amenity of these properties or that of the surrounding area would be adversely affected by the proposed development. The retrospective fencing can be stained and there are existing examples of garden enclosure within the general area. In addition, the streetscene will be altered once the extension at the front of 255 Glen More, that has planning consent, is erected.

6.5 On the basis of the above, it is recommended that planning permission be granted subject to a condition to stain the fencing in a dark wood stain.

7 Reasons for Decision 7.1 The proposal does not have an adverse impact on residential or visual amenity. It complies with Policies 4 and 6 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan and Policy 13 of the associated Supplementary Guidance.3: Development Management, Placemaking and Design and Policies 3 and 5 of the proposed South Lanarkshire Council Development Plan 2. There are no other additional material considerations which would justify refusing to grant planning permission.

Michael McGlynn Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources)

15 January 2019

Previous references  EK/17/0165 – 255 Glen More, East Kilbride

List of background papers ► Application form ► Application plans ► South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2015 (adopted) ► Proposed South Lanarkshire Development Plan 2 ► Neighbour notification letter dated 9 November 2018 ► Representations Dated:

Mrs Lawra Doig, 31 Glen Arroch, East Kilbride, G74 2BP 14.11.2018

Robin Ellerington, 255 Glen More, St Leonards, East Kilbride, 02.12.2018 G742AR

Mr Robin Ellerington, 255 Glen More, East Kilbride, Glasgow, 09.11.2018 South Lanarkshire, G74 2AR

Mrs Lesley Davidson, 1 Torrance Wynd, East Kilbride, 18.11.2018 Glasgow, South Lanarkshire, G75 0RY

Mrs Lisa Ellerington, 255 Glen More, East Kilbride, Glasgow, 12.11.2018 South Lanarkshire, G74 2AR

Mr A. Davidson, 1 Torrance Wynd, East Kilbride, Glasgow, 24.11.2018 South Lanarkshire, G75 0RY

Mr Colin Hendry, 2 Glen Cannich, East Kilbride, G74 2BW 14.11.2018

Contact for further information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:- Mohammed Hussain, Planning Officer, Montrose House, 154 Montrose Crescent, Hamilton, ML3 6LB Phone: 01698 455269 Email: [email protected]

14 Detailed Planning Application

Paper apart – Application number: P/18/1565

Conditions and Reasons

01. That within 1 month of the date of this consent, the applicant shall submit samples of a dark wood stain finish for consideration and approval by the Council. Thereafter, and within 3 months of the date of this consent, the applicant shall paint the fencing using the agreed woodstain colour to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority.

Reason: In the interests of amenity

16 Agenda Item

Report 6 Report to: East Kilbride Area Committee Date of Meeting: 30 January 2019 Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)

Subject: Community Grant Applications

1. Purpose of Report 1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- [purpose]  request approval for the allocation of community grants to 7 community groups in the East Kilbride Area Committee area from the 2018/2019 community grant budget [1purpose] 2. Recommendation(s) 2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- [recs] (1) that community grants be awarded as follows:-

(a) Applicant: Glassford Women’s Rural Institute, Strathaven (EK/68/18) Amount Requested: £100 Purpose of Grant: Outing Amount Awarded: £100

(b) Applicant: Friends of Westwoodhill Recreation Area, East Kilbride (EK/70/18) Amount Requested: £250 Purpose of Grant: Start-up costs Amount Awarded: £250

(c) Applicant: Allers Allotments Association, East Kilbride (EK/72/18) Amount Requested: £400 Purpose of Grant: Equipment and materials Amount Awarded: £300

(d) Applicant: ENABLE (East Kilbride Branch) (EK/73/18) Amount Requested: £250 Purpose of Grant: Entrance fees Amount Awarded: £250

(e) Applicant: Duncanrig Rambling Club, East Kilbride (EK/74/18) Amount Requested: £300 Purpose of Grant: Outing, administration and publicity costs Amount Awarded: £250

(f) Applicant: Westwood Parish Church – Tuesday Leisure Club, East Kilbride (EK/75/18) Amount Requested: £200 Purpose of Grant: Outing Amount Awarded: £200

(g) Applicant: Friends of Langlands Moss Local Nature Reserve Group, East Kilbride (EK/76/18) Amount Requested: £200 Purpose of Grant: Administration and publicity costs Amount Awarded: £200

3. Background 3.1. The Council operates a community grants scheme to support local constituted community groups and voluntary organisations. Applications are invited continually throughout the year.

3.2. All applications require to be supported by a constitution, audited accounts or annual income and expenditure accounts, a bank statement, and confirmation that the group/organisation will adhere to the conditions of the grant award.

4. Employee Implications 4.1. None.

5. Financial Implications 5.1. The current position of the community grant allocation for the East Kilbride Area Committee area in 2018/2019 is as follows:-

Total allocation for Community Grants £25,750 Grants previously allocated £19,395 Community Grants recommended in this report £1,550 Remaining balance £4,805

6. Other Implications 6.1. The risk to the Council is that grant funding is not utilised for the purpose of which it was intended. This risk is mitigated by internal controls including audit procedures and conditions of grant agreement.

6.2. There are no apparent implications in terms of sustainable development.

7. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements 7.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a change to an existing policy, function or strategy and therefore no impact assessment is required.

7.2. All the necessary consultation with the community groups has taken place.

Paul Manning Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)

16 January 2019

Link(s) to Council Values/Ambitions/Objectives ♦ Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent. Work with communities and partners to promote high quality, thriving and sustainable communities

Previous References  None

List of Background Papers  Individual application forms

Contact for Further Information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:- Jennifer Hilston, Clerical Assistant Ext: 4822 (Tel: 01698 454822) E-mail: [email protected]