Figures8 Copie

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Figures8 Copie WP 081575383.1 Chromobacterium haemolyticum RKU35862.1 Candidatus Poribacteria bacterium Acanthamoeba royreba CDEZ01019746 TAG86295.1 Oscillatoriales cyanobacterium WP 072919099.1 Pseudobutyrivibrio xylanivorans WP 015176379.1 Oscillatoria nigro-viridis WP 127080300.1 Calothrix desertica WP 087213476.1 Drancourtella sp. An177 RKY98400.1 Candidatus Hydrothermae bacterium PIP84007.1 Elusimicrobia bacterium WP 004105043.1 Gardnerella vaginalis RZN15498.1 Methanosarcinales archaeon CRF49284.1 Helicobacter heilmannii WP 096691648.1 Calothrix CRF46863.1 Helicobacter heilmannii WP 002794015.1 Microcystis aeruginosa WP 130756444.1 Microcystis aeruginosa WP 002769051.1 Microcystis aeruginosa ppam cds 790 pdul cds 889 WP 052277772.1 Microcystis WP 133512129.1 Candidatus Thiosymbion oneisti REJ41137.1 Microcystis flos-aquae RMH30763.1WP 089725598.1 CandidatusWP CandidatusHydrogenedentes 045361715.1REJ49322.1 Thiosymbion Microcystis Microcystis bacterium oneisti aeruginosa wesenbergii Acanthamoeba royreba CDEZ01022145 pmas cds 277 pmac cds 678 pbra cds 273 psal cds 930 pqer cds 896 pcts cds 910 pino cds 313 PYT51219.1 Acidobacteria bacterium RKY19655.1 Planctomycetes bacterium RMH48640.1 Gammaproteobacteria bacterium RMH17751.1 Acidobacteria bacterium TAK36666.1 Chloroflexi bacterium OQX89710.1 candidate division Zixibacteria bacterium OYD15599.1 candidate division WOR-3 bacterium AAT65822.1 uncultured bacterium RMH25223.1 Planctomycetes bacterium WP 012107912.1 Methanoregula boonei RMD96882.1 Calditrichaeota bacterium RME61476.1 Candidatus Parcubacteria bacterium RMF56977.1 Calditrichaeota bacterium TKJ37499.1 Planctomycetes bacterium PIP05737.1 Syntrophobacterales bacterium OQY11407.1 Desulfobacteraceae bacterium RZB37737.1 Desulfobacteraceae bacterium pcts cds 576 RMH32555.1 Nitrospirae bacterium pqer cds 559 WP 004073065.1 Desulfobacter postgatei RPI77900.1 Desulfobacteraceae bacterium pino cds 741 OGW52321.1 Nitrospirae bacterium psal cds 656 WP 076791395.1 Chlorobium sp. KB01 pdul cds 425 CBE70120.1 Candidatus Methylomirabilis oxyfera WP 116477055.1 candidate division NC10 bacterium WP 110914661.1 Gluconacetobacter entanii OFX17209.1 Armatimonadetes bacterium RJR33624.1 Deltaproteobacteria bacterium RLI52297.1 TEU11537.1Candidatus ThorarchaeotaAnaerolineales archaeonbacterium OIO98712.1 Armatimonadetes bacterium PIU89887.1 Armatimonadetes bacterium Acanthamoeba castellanii AEYA01000611 RLC69933.1 Chloroflexi bacterium pneo cds 78 WP 012120326.1 Roseiflexus castenholzii pbra cds 857 RMD58979.1 Candidatus Parcubacteria bacterium Acanthamoeba quina CDFN01052576 Acanthamoeba palestinensis CDFD01053683 TAN37305.1 Verrucomicrobia bacterium psal cds 866 pino cds 419 OFW80354.1 Alphaproteobacteria bacterium pdul cds 713 PYS89149.1 Acidobacteria bacterium ppam cds 637 WP 012645678.1 Geobacter daltonii KXK52862.1 Chlorobi bacterium OLB7 PCI25943.1 SAR324 cluster bacterium PLS67641.1 Cyanobacteria bacterium WP 091001375.1 Paenibacillus sp. OK003 WP 065956182.1 Alishewanella sp. HH-ZS WP 096691073.1 Calothrix WP 119348770.1 Mariniphaga sediminis GAK53558.1 Candidatus Moduliflexus flocculans WP 102576529.1 Vibrio splendidus Tree scale: 1 WP 110177623.1 Vibrio parahaemolyticus RMG84430.1 Bacteroidetes bacterium OOE84209.1 Salinivibrio siamensis AAO48713.1 Geobacillus stearothermophilus Virus WP 101494494.1 Salinivibrio siamensis KHL60651.1 Xanthomonas euvesicatoria WP 003386490.1 Brevibacillus borstelensis WP 011346608.1 Xanthomonas euvesicatoria WP 121354153.1 Flavisolibacter sp. Eukaryote WP 099540281.1 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OFY86450.1 Bacteroidetes bacterium WP 099527271.1 Xanthomonadaceae WP 130561212.1 Pseudoxanthomonas sp. Boostrap 50 100 WP 091854427.1 Marinobacter segnicrescens WP 010420074.1 Anaerophaga thermohalophila WP 080781289.1 Cronobacter sakazakii RMG16829.1 Bacteroidetes bacterium WP 131164850.1 Serratia marcescens OFX46991.1 Bacteroidetes bacterium WP 101835969.1 Yersiniaceae bacterium ODT52170.1 Niastella sp. SCN 39-18 WP 117032981.1 Klebsiella pneumoniae WP 106855688.1 Burkholderia novacaledonica SAK96717.1 Caballeronia glebae WP 086973932.1 Caballeronia glebae OQX81120.1CDC36525.1 Bacteroidetes Butyrivibrio bacterium sp. 4484ppam CAG 276 cds318 578 ml 498 WP 106442997.1 Gammaproteobacteria pdul cds 639 PZV06893.1 Leptolyngbya sp. WP 137718732.1 Methylobacillus flagellatus WP 104749406.1WP 084927894.1 Helicobacter Streptococcus cynogastricus mitis TDQ34798.1 Thiopseudomonas denitrificans WP 101498029.1 Thiopseudomonas denitrificans A. mauritaniensis CDFE01048231 A. palestinensis CDFD01027416 A. palestinensis CDFD01055957 A. polyphaga CDFK01088513 A. palestinensis CDFD01029640 ck412 pv 264 ml 216 WP 017715128.1 Oscillatoria sp. PCC 10802 WP 123618439.1 Muribaculaceae bacterium WP 015080220.1 Anabaena sp. 90 WP 055337559.1 Paeniclostridium sordellii TAF18043.1 Oscillatoriales cyanobacterium WP 118048282.1 Ruminococcus gnavus WP 118174855.1 Ruminococcus WP 010078337.1 Lactobacillus mali WP 114684076.1 Lactobacillus fermentum TAF07344.1 Nostocales cyanobacterium EXM37658.1 Ruminococcus albus SY3 WP 051506665.1 Ruminococcus albus ml 135 WP 101591177.1 Bacillus sp. M6-12 WP 117524349.1 Ruminococcus sp. AF42-10 WP 003020760.1 Blautia hansenii CEG02211.1 Bacillus sp. B-jedd (Bradyrhizobiaceae) WP 082036346.1 Bacillus sp. B-jedd WP 017697098.1 Bacillus subtilis WP 104885728.1 Enterococcus faecalis OLF86377.1 Bacillus paralicheniformis WP 075213389.1 Bacillus paralicheniformis WP 015956398.1 Gloeothece citriformis WP 098204033.1 Bacillus wiedmannii (Bradyrhizobiaceae) RKU08522.1 Candidatus Poribacteria bacterium (Paracoccus)(Bradyrhizobiaceae) (Bradyrhizobiaceae) WP 100861423.1 AeromonasSTZ07135.1 lusitana Moraxella caprae WP 085113380.1OHA15099.1 Thermoanaerobacterium Candidatus Taylorbacteria sp. bacteriumPSU-2 WP 036388395.1 Moraxella caprae KIN27531.1 Bacillus subtilis OGZ74119.1 Candidatus Staskawiczbacteria bacterium WP 042072487.1 Aeromonas enteropelogenes OGY50992.1 Candidatus Buchananbacteria bacterium WP 041352123.1 Bacillus subtilis KIN53263.1 Bacillus subtilis WP 052470571.1 Bacillus subtilis WP 072692944.1 Bacillus subtilis WP 019265786.1 Methanobrevibacter smithii WP 081372071.1 Bacillus safensis Acanthamoeba polyphaga linc LQHA01005312.1 WP 042631248.1 Bacillus cereus KIL30495.1 Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis CDH95447.1 Bacillus velezensis NAU-B3 WP 101860583.1 Bacillus halotolerans WP 098886209.1 Bacillus toyonensis WP 098577777.1 Bacillus wiedmannii WP 099683206.1 Bacillus sp. 17-SMS-01 WP 122958939.1 Brevibacillus borstelensis.
Recommended publications
  • Marine Sediments Illuminate Chlamydiae Diversity and Evolution
    Supplementary Information for: Marine sediments illuminate Chlamydiae diversity and evolution Jennah E. Dharamshi1, Daniel Tamarit1†, Laura Eme1†, Courtney Stairs1, Joran Martijn1, Felix Homa1, Steffen L. Jørgensen2, Anja Spang1,3, Thijs J. G. Ettema1,4* 1 Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden 2 Department of Earth Science, Centre for Deep Sea Research, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway 3 Department of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, and Utrecht University, NL-1790 AB Den Burg, The Netherlands 4 Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands. † These authors contributed equally * Correspondence to: Thijs J. G. Ettema, Email: [email protected] Supplementary Information Supplementary Discussions ............................................................................................................................ 3 1. Evolutionary relationships within the Chlamydiae phylum ............................................................................. 3 2. Insights into the evolution of pathogenicity in Chlamydiaceae ...................................................................... 8 3. Secretion systems and flagella in Chlamydiae .............................................................................................. 13 4. Phylogenetic diversity of chlamydial nucleotide transporters. ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Activated Sludge Microbial Community and Treatment Performance of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Industrial and Municipal Zones
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Activated Sludge Microbial Community and Treatment Performance of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Industrial and Municipal Zones Yongkui Yang 1,2 , Longfei Wang 1, Feng Xiang 1, Lin Zhao 1,2 and Zhi Qiao 1,2,* 1 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (L.W.); [email protected] (F.X.); [email protected] (L.Z.) 2 China-Singapore Joint Center for Sustainable Water Management, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-22-87402072 Received: 14 November 2019; Accepted: 7 January 2020; Published: 9 January 2020 Abstract: Controlling wastewater pollution from centralized industrial zones is important for reducing overall water pollution. Microbial community structure and diversity can adversely affect wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) performance and stability. Therefore, we studied microbial structure, diversity, and metabolic functions in WWTPs that treat industrial or municipal wastewater. Sludge microbial community diversity and richness were the lowest for the industrial WWTPs, indicating that industrial influents inhibited bacterial growth. The sludge of industrial WWTP had low Nitrospira populations, indicating that influent composition affected nitrification and denitrification. The sludge of industrial WWTPs had high metabolic functions associated with xenobiotic and amino acid metabolism. Furthermore, bacterial richness was positively correlated with conventional pollutants (e.g., carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus), but negatively correlated with total dissolved solids. This study was expected to provide a more comprehensive understanding of activated sludge microbial communities in full-scale industrial and municipal WWTPs. Keywords: activated sludge; industrial zone; metabolic function; microbial community; wastewater treatment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Reconstruction for Eukaryotes from Complex Natural Microbial Communities
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/171355; this version posted August 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Genome-reconstruction for eukaryotes from complex natural microbial communities Patrick T. West1, Alexander J. Probst2, Igor V. Grigoriev1,5, Brian C. Thomas2, Jillian F. Banfield2,3,4* 1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 2Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 3Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 4Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. 5US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA. * Corresponding Author Running title Metagenomic Reconstruction of Eukaryotic Genomes Keywords metagenomics, eukaryotes, genome, gene prediction Corresponding author contact info Jillian Banfield Department of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management UC Berkeley 130 Mulford Hall #3114 Berkeley, CA 94720 [email protected] (510) 643-2155 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/171355; this version posted August 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Abstract Microbial eukaryotes are integral components of natural microbial communities and their inclusion is critical for many ecosystem studies yet the majority of published metagenome analyses ignore eukaryotes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Communities Associated with Cell Phones and Shoes
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 9 June 2020. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/9235), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Coil DA, Neches RY, Lang JM, Jospin G, Brown WE, Cavalier D, Hampton- Marcell J, Gilbert JA, Eisen JA. 2020. Bacterial communities associated with cell phones and shoes. PeerJ 8:e9235 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9235 Bacterial communities associated with cell phones and shoes David A Coil Corresp., 1 , Russell Y Neches 1 , Jenna M Lang 1 , Guillaume Jospin 1 , Wendy E Brown 2, 3 , Darlene Cavalier 3, 4 , Jarrad Hampton-Marcell 5 , Jack A Gilbert 6 , Jonathan A Eisen Corresp. 7 1 Genome Center, UC Davis, Davis, California, United States 2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States 3 Science Cheerleaders, Inc, United States 4 SciStarter.org, United States 5 Argonne National Laboratory, University of Chicago, Lemont, Illinois, United States 6 Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States 7 Genome Center, Department of Evolution and Ecology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States Corresponding Authors: David A Coil, Jonathan A Eisen Email address: [email protected], [email protected] Background: Every human being carries with them a collection of microbes, a collection that is likely both unique to that person, but also dynamic as a result of significant flux with the surrounding environment. The interaction of the human microbiome (i.e., the microbes that are found directly in contact with a person in places such as the gut, mouth, and skin) and the microbiome of accessory objects (e.g., shoes, clothing, phones, jewelry) is of potential interest to both epidemiology and the developing field of microbial forensics.
    [Show full text]
  • Metagenomic Views of Microbial Dynamics Influenced By
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Metagenomic views of microbial dynamics infuenced by hydrocarbon seepage in sediments of the Gulf of Mexico Rui Zhao1, Zarath M. Summers2, Glenn D. Christman1, Kristin M. Yoshimura1 & Jennifer F. Biddle1* Microbial cells in the seabed are thought to persist by slow population turnover rates and extremely low energy requirements. External stimulations such as seafoor hydrocarbon seeps have been demonstrated to signifcantly boost microbial growth; however, the microbial community response has not been fully understood. Here we report a comparative metagenomic study of microbial response to natural hydrocarbon seeps in the Gulf of Mexico. Subsurface sediments (10–15 cm below seafoor) were collected from fve natural seep sites and two reference sites. The resulting metagenome sequencing datasets were analyzed with both gene-based and genome-based approaches. 16S rRNA gene-based analyses suggest that the seep samples are distinct from the references by both 16S rRNA fractional content and phylogeny, with the former dominated by ANME-1 archaea (~50% of total) and Desulfobacterales, and the latter dominated by the Deltaproteobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Chlorofexi phyla. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are present in both types of samples, with higher relative abundances in seep samples than the references. Genes for nitrogen fxation were predominantly found in the seep sites, whereas the reference sites showed a dominant signal for anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox). We recovered 49 metagenome-assembled genomes and assessed the microbial functional potentials in both types of samples. By this genome-based analysis, the seep samples were dominated by ANME-1 archaea and SRB, with the capacity for methane oxidation coupled to sulfate reduction, which is consistent with the 16S rRNA-gene based characterization.
    [Show full text]
  • Dramatic Expansion of Microbial Groups That Shape the Global Sulfur Cycle 2 3 Authors: Karthik Anantharaman1*, Sean P
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/166447; this version posted July 21, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Title: Dramatic expansion of microbial groups that shape the global sulfur cycle 2 3 Authors: Karthik Anantharaman1*, Sean P. Jungbluth2, Rose S. Kantor3, Adi Lavy1, Lesley A. 4 Warren4, Michael S. Rappé5, Brian C. Thomas1, and Jillian F. Banfield1,6,7* 5 Affiliations: 6 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Berkeley, CA, USA 7 2DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA 8 3Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA 9 4Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario, CANADA 10 5Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Kaneohe, HI, USA 11 6Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, Berkeley, CA, USA 12 7Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 13 USA 14 15 *Corresponding author 16 Email: [email protected] 17 Address: 307 McCone Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/166447; this version posted July 21, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Endomicrobia
    Environment GCF 001642875 4 16S 1 Mariniblastus fucicola GCF 001642875 GCF 002277955 1 16S 1 Thermogutta terrifontis GCF 002277955 GCF 000255655 9 16S 1 Schlesneria paludicola DSM 18645 GCF 000255655 Freshwater GCF 001610835 1 16S 2 Planctomyces sp SH PL14 GCF 001610835 GCF 001610835 1 16S 1 Planctomyces sp SH PL14 GCF 001610835 GCF 000165715 1 16S 1 Rubinisphaera brasiliensis DSM 5305 GCF 000165715 Tree scale: 0.1 GCF 000165715 1 16S 2 Rubinisphaera brasiliensis DSM 5305 GCF 000165715 GCF 900129635 4 16S 3 Singulisphaera sp GP187 GCF 900129635 Soil GCF 900129635 4 16S 2 Singulisphaera sp GP187 GCF 900129635 GCF 900129635 4 16S 1 Singulisphaera sp GP187 GCF 900129635 GCF 900129635 5 16S 1 Singulisphaera sp GP187 GCF 900129635 GCF 900129635 5 16S 3 Singulisphaera sp GP187 GCF 900129635 Sediment GCF 900129635 5 16S 4 Singulisphaera sp GP187 GCF 900129635 GCF 900129635 5 16S 5 Singulisphaera sp GP187 GCF 900129635 GCF 900129635 5 16S 2 Singulisphaera sp GP187 GCF 900129635 GCF 000417735 1 16S 1 Chlamydia psittaci 10 881 SC42 GCF 000417735 Gut GCF 000750955 17 16S 1 Criblamydia sequanensis CRIB 18 GCF 000750955 GCF 900000175 28 16S 1 Estrella lausannensis GCF 900000175 GCF 000092785 1 16S 2 Waddlia chondrophila WSU 86 1044 GCF 000092785 GCF 000092785 1 16S 1 Waddlia chondrophila WSU 86 1044 GCF 000092785 GCF 000237205 1 16S 1 Simkania negevensis Z GCF 000237205 Oil GCA 000756735 1 16S 2 Candidatus Rubidus massiliensis GCA 000756735 GCA 000756735 1 16S 1 Candidatus Rubidus massiliensis GCA 000756735 GCF 001545115 16 16S 1 Parachlamydia sp
    [Show full text]
  • Expanded Diversity of Microbial Groups That Shape the Dissimilatory Sulfur Cycle
    The ISME Journal (2018) 12:1715–1728 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0078-0 ARTICLE Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle 1,2 3 4,11 5 1 Karthik Anantharaman ● Bela Hausmann ● Sean P. Jungbluth ● Rose S. Kantor ● Adi Lavy ● 6 7 8 3 1 Lesley A. Warren ● Michael S. Rappé ● Michael Pester ● Alexander Loy ● Brian C. Thomas ● Jillian F. Banfield 1,9,10 Received: 11 October 2017 / Revised: 10 January 2018 / Accepted: 13 January 2018 / Published online: 21 February 2018 © The Author(s) 2018. This article is published with open access Abstract A critical step in the biogeochemical cycle of sulfur on Earth is microbial sulfate reduction, yet organisms from relatively few lineages have been implicated in this process. Previous studies using functional marker genes have detected abundant, novel dissimilatory sulfite reductases (DsrAB) that could confer the capacity for microbial sulfite/sulfate reduction but were not affiliated with known organisms. Thus, the identity of a significant fraction of sulfate/sulfite-reducing microbes has remained elusive. Here we report the discovery of the capacity for sulfate/sulfite reduction in the genomes of organisms from 1234567890();,: 13 bacterial and archaeal phyla, thereby more than doubling the number of microbial phyla associated with this process. Eight of the 13 newly identified groups are candidate phyla that lack isolated representatives, a finding only possible given genomes from metagenomes. Organisms from Verrucomicrobia and two candidate phyla, Candidatus Rokubacteria and Candidatus Hydrothermarchaeota, contain some of the earliest evolved dsrAB genes. The capacity for sulfite reduction has been laterally transferred in multiple events within some phyla, and a key gene potentially capable of modulating sulfur metabolism in associated cells has been acquired by putatively symbiotic bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Resolved Metagenomics Reveals Site-Specific Diversity of Episymbiotic CPR Bacteria and DPANN Archaea in Groundwater Ecosystems
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-00840-5 Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals site-specific diversity of episymbiotic CPR bacteria and DPANN archaea in groundwater ecosystems Christine He 1, Ray Keren 2, Michael L. Whittaker3,4, Ibrahim F. Farag 1, Jennifer A. Doudna 1,5,6,7,8, Jamie H. D. Cate 1,5,6,7 and Jillian F. Banfield 1,4,9 ✉ Candidate phyla radiation (CPR) bacteria and DPANN archaea are unisolated, small-celled symbionts that are often detected in groundwater. The effects of groundwater geochemistry on the abundance, distribution, taxonomic diversity and host associa- tion of CPR bacteria and DPANN archaea has not been studied. Here, we performed genome-resolved metagenomic analysis of one agricultural and seven pristine groundwater microbial communities and recovered 746 CPR and DPANN genomes in total. The pristine sites, which serve as local sources of drinking water, contained up to 31% CPR bacteria and 4% DPANN archaea. We observed little species-level overlap of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) across the groundwater sites, indicating that CPR and DPANN communities may be differentiated according to physicochemical conditions and host populations. Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy imaging and genomic analyses enabled us to identify CPR and DPANN lineages that reproduc- ibly attach to host cells and showed that the growth of CPR bacteria seems to be stimulated by attachment to host-cell surfaces. Our analysis reveals site-specific diversity of CPR bacteria and DPANN archaea that coexist with diverse hosts in groundwater aquifers. Given that CPR and DPANN organisms have been identified in human microbiomes and their presence is correlated with diseases such as periodontitis, our findings are relevant to considerations of drinking water quality and human health.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Comparative Genomics Reveals Over 50 Phyla of Free‑Living and Pathogenic Bacteria Are Associated with Diverse Members of the Amoebozoa Yonas I
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Comprehensive comparative genomics reveals over 50 phyla of free‑living and pathogenic bacteria are associated with diverse members of the amoebozoa Yonas I. Tekle*, Janae M. Lyttle, Maya G. Blasingame & Fang Wang The Amoebozoa, a group containing predominantly amoeboid unicellular protists has been shown to play an important ecological role in controlling environmental bacteria. Amoebozoans not only graze bacteria but also serve as a safe niche for bacterial replication and harbor endosymbiotic bacteria including dangerous human pathogens. Despite their importance, only a few lineages of Amoebozoa have been studied in this regard. In this research, we conducted a comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic study with expansive taxon sampling by including representatives from the three known clades of the Amoebozoa. We used culture independent whole culture and single cell genomics/transcriptomics to investigate the association of bacteria with diverse amoebozoans. Relative to current published evidence, we recovered the largest number of bacterial phyla (64) and human pathogen genera (51) associated with the Amoebozoa. Using single cell genomics/ transcriptomics we were able to determine up to 24 potential endosymbiotic bacterial phyla, some potentially endosymbionts. This includes the majority of multi‑drug resistant pathogens designated as major public health threats. Our study demonstrates amoebozoans are associated with many more phylogenetically diverse bacterial phyla than previously recognized. It also shows that all amoebozoans are capable of harboring far more dangerous human pathogens than presently documented, making them of primal public health concern. Te study of microbial interactions is a complex and fascinating feld of research 1–3. Microorganisms occupy diverse ecological niches and are usually found in large communities that result in inherent interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon and Sulfur Cycling Below the Chemocline in a Meromictic Lake
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Previously Published Works Title Carbon and Sulfur Cycling below the Chemocline in a Meromictic Lake and the Identification of a Novel Taxonomic Lineage in the FCB Superphylum, Candidatus Aegiribacteria. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/56t688bv Authors Hamilton, Trinity L Bovee, Roderick J Sattin, Sarah R et al. Publication Date 2016 DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00598 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 27 April 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00598 Carbon and Sulfur Cycling below the Chemocline in a Meromictic Lake and the Identification of a Novel Taxonomic Lineage in the FCB Superphylum, Candidatus Aegiribacteria Edited by: Trinity L. Hamilton 1*, Roderick J. Bovee 2, Sarah R. Sattin 2, Wiebke Mohr 2 †, Andreas Teske, William P. Gilhooly III 3, Timothy W. Lyons 4, Ann Pearson 2* and Jennifer L. Macalady 5* University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3 Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University Reviewed by: Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 4 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA, 5 Penn State John R. Spear, Astrobiology Research Center, Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, TX, USA Colorado School of Mines, USA Alexander Loy, University of Vienna, Austria Mahoney Lake in British Columbia is an extreme meromictic system with unusually *Correspondence: high levels of sulfate and sulfide present in the water column. As is common in Trinity L.
    [Show full text]
  • Depth-Discrete Eco-Genomics of Lake Tanganyika Reveals Roles of Diverse Microbes, 1 Including Candidate Phyla, in Tropical Fresh
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/834861; this version posted November 8, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Depth-discrete eco-genomics of Lake Tanganyika reveals roles of diverse microbes, 2 including candidate phyla, in tropical freshwater nutrient cycling 3 4 Patricia Q. Tran1,2, Peter B. McIntyre3, Benjamin M. Kraemer4, Yvonne Vadeboncoeur5, Ismael 5 A. Kimirei6, Rashid Tamatamah6, Katherine D. McMahon1,7, Karthik Anantharaman1 6 1. Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA 7 2. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 8 USA 9 3. Department of Ecology and Evolution, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA 10 4. Department of Ecosystem Research, Leibniz Institute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland 11 Fisheries, Berlin, Germany 12 5. Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA 13 6. Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute (TAFIRI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 14 7. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 15 Madison, WI, USA 16 17 Corresponding author: Karthik Anantharaman ([email protected]) 18 19 Abstract 20 Lake Tanganyika, the largest tropical freshwater lake and the second largest by volume 21 on Earth is characterized by strong oxygen and redox gradients. In spite of the majority of its 22 water column being anoxic, Tanganyika hosts some of the most diverse and prolific fisheries and 23 ecosystems on Earth.
    [Show full text]