DOCSLIB.ORG

From Violence to Resistance: Judith Butler's Critique Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Violence to Resistance: Judith Butler's Critique Of View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto The Department of Philosophy, History, Culture, and Art Studies University of Helsinki FROM VIOLENCE TO RESISTANCE: JUDITH BUTLER’S CRITIQUE OF NORMS Sanna Karhu ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Helsinki, for public examination in auditorium XII, University main building, on Saturday 23 September 2017, at 10 a.m. © 2017 Sanna Karhu ISBN 978-951-51-3647-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-51-3648-0 (PDF) http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/ Unigrafia Helsinki 2017 To Miska. In loving memory. 2 ABSTRACT In this doctoral dissertation, I provide a systematic analysis of the role of so- cial norms in the thought of philosopher and feminist theorist, Judith Butler. More specifically, I investigate the way in which Butler theorizes the relation- ship between norms and violence in light of her notions of critique and re- sistance. The key argument of the study is that in order to understand the wide range of topics that Butler addresses in her work—such as gender nor- malization, the critique of violence, ethical responsiveness, and the biopoliti- cal regulation of life—we need to pay close attention to her account of norms. Although Butler’s theorization of norms has begun to attract increasing scholarly interest, a thorough analysis of the topic has not yet been written. In order to fill this gap in previous research, my dissertation offers the first monograph-length study that explicates the problematic of norms in Butler’s thought. My study seeks to answer the following questions: What is the role of norms in Butler’s work? How does Butler conceptualize the relationship between norms, violence, and nonviolence? How should we understand critique, transformation, and resistance in the midst of norms? What are the ethical and political implications of Butler’s notion of norms? I respond to these questions by examining Butler’s theorization of norms through what I call her twofold understanding of norms. I argue that on the one hand Butler theorizes norms as mechanisms of social power that violently regulate the field of recognizable subjects, bodies, and lives, but on the other hand she conceptualizes norms in terms of the possibility of critical change and re- sistance. I illustrate Butler’s twofold notion of norms through four key topics, which I have organized into four main chapters. First, by examining Butler’s often- neglected feminist theoretical background in the thought of Monique Wittig, I argue that her conception of the relationship between norms and violence critically builds on Wittig’s argument that normative heterosexuality can be understood as a form of discursive violence. Second, through explicating But- ler’s conception of gender normalization vis-à-vis her generally overlooked discussions of transgender embodiment and livability, I challenge recent ar- guments that feminists should get rid of the concept of gender. By introduc- ing the concept of “trans livability” I highlight Butler’s work as a contribution to trans-affirmative feminist theory. Third, by challenging the general tendency to interpret Butler as a critical humanist, I demonstrate that she puts forward a critique of anthropocen- trism that offers insights into problematizing the speciesist norms that up- hold not only the human-animal binary but also differentiates between liva- 3 ble and killable nonhuman animals. Finally, by foregrounding Butler’s psy- choanalytic account of grief in terms of her critique of norms, I argue that her discussion of the normative separation between grievable and ungrievable lives does not represent a turn away from politics as many critics have ar- gued. I contend that her account of grievability must instead be understood as a theorization of resistance. Taken together, all the four chapters of my dissertation highlight Butler’s theorization of norms as a practice of feminist critique. By elucidating the re- lationship between norms, violence, and social change, my study emphasizes the close relationship between feminist and queer practices of political re- sistance and the critique of norms. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Although the research conducted for this dissertation was mostly carried out alone, I have received plenty of support from numerous people during the course of my project that lasted five and a half years. First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisors, Professor Tuija Pulkkinen and Professor Johanna Oksala. Completing this project would not have been possible without their unwavering support, guidance, and encour- agement. I owe special gratitude to my two pre-examiners, Professor Moya Lloyd and Professor Catherine Mills. I highly appreciate your comprehensive and de- tailed comments on my dissertation. Thank you. I have been privileged to be a salaried member of the Finnish Gender Studies Doctoral Program, led by Prof. Pulkkinen. The regular meetings and work- shops of the program gave me an invaluable opportunity to receive com- ments and critique from a group of dedicated gender studies professors. I wish to thank the professors Päivi Korvajärvi, Marianne Liljeström, Päivi Naskali, Harriet Silius, and Jaana Vuori. I also want to thank all the mem- bers who participated in the doctoral student group for their clever com- ments, peer support, and enthusiastic discussions during and outside the workshops. Special thanks go to Liu Xin, Johanna Hiitola, Mona Mannevuo, Niina Vuolajärvi, Salla Peltonen, and Aino-Kaisa Koistinen. While conducting research for this dissertation I closely collaborated with Prof. Pulkkinen’s project and research team “Politics of Philosophy and Gen- der” (PPhiG) and attended regularly the workshops, seminars, and symposi- ums with the other team members. I wish to thank Anna Elomäki, Julian Honkasalo, Heini Kinnunen, Jacek Kornak, Mervi Patosalmi, Soili Petäjäniemi-Brown, Heta Rundgren, and Eeva Urrio for their insightful and thorough comments on various parts of my manuscript. My thanks also go to Pilvi Toppinen who occasionally attended our seminars. We also were fortu- nate to have several guest professors in our seminars. I am grateful to com- ments by Professors Anne-Emmanuelle Berger, Penelope Deutscher, Clare Hemmings, Susanne Lettow, and Moya Lloyd. I warmly thank all my colleagues in Gender Studies and in the Doctoral Pro- gramme in Gender, Culture, and Society (SKY) at the University of Helsinki. In particular, I want to thank Heini Kinnunen, with whom I shared an office. Thank you for being a wonderful officemate all these years. Joking and laughing with you was the best form of stress-relief during my intensive peri- ods of writing. My sincere thanks are also due to my former teachers Laura 5 Werner and Leena-Maija Rossi who both encouraged me to pursuit a doctor- al degree. In summer 2016, I attended Professor Judith Butler’s Master Class “From Freud to Klein: Death Drive, Pleasure, Ethics” at The Institute for Critical So- cial Inquiry (ICSI), The New School for Social Research. I want to thank Prof. Butler and the participants in the Master Class for intellectually stimulating discussions on Freudian and Kleinian psychoanalysis. Part of this project was completed during my visit to the Department of Comparative Literature at New York University in 2016-2017. I am very grateful to Professor Emanuela Bianchi who hosted me and provided insight- ful comments on chapter drafts of the manuscript. I especially enjoyed our conversations on feminist theory and continental philosophy at La Lanterna. My thanks also go to Laryssa Witty for her assistance with practical issues during my stay at NYU. I also wish to thank the members of the Queer Theory reading group in the Department of Philosophy at The New School for Social Research for invig- orating discussions on queer and feminist theory. In particular, I want to thank Ryan Gustafson and Robert Cremins for inspirational conversations and friendship. Throughout the years that I spent writing the dissertation, my friends have supported me in numerous ways. Warm thanks go to Maisa Akkola, Annukka Jamisto, Laura Menard, Jenni Müller, Laura Tulehmo, Vilma Venesmaa, and Liu Xin. In addition to my human friends, two nonhuman animals also de- serve special mentioning: my dearest dog, Miska, the smart and sensitive German Pinscher, as well as Stevie, my later adoptee, the silly little Rat Ter- rier mix. Even under the many pressures of PhD studies, my life has been full of joy and laughter thanks to you. I want to thank the Finnish Gender Studies Doctoral Program, American Scandinavian Foundation, Academy of Finland (Prof. Pulkkinen’s Academy Professor project “Philosophy and Politics in Feminist Theory”), and the University of Helsinki for funding this dissertation project. I also want to sincerely thank my mother Pirkko Lehtimäki and my father Timo Loukola for their profound and inestimable support. I am deeply grate- ful for your love, care, and trust. Finally, I wish to express my heartfelt thanks to my partner, Julian, for his unfaltering emotional and intellectual support. Not only did he read and comment the entire manuscript in the last phase of the writing process, but 6 he also provided me with encouraging and funny Rocky Balboa quotes in those moments when I exactly needed them. The Bronx, New York, 28 August 2017 Sanna Karhu 7 CONTENTS ABSTRACT .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 171 Subverting Lévi-Strauss's Structuralism
    Humanitas, 2020; 8(16): 171-186 http://dergipark.gov.tr/humanitas ISSN: 2645-8837 DOI: 10.20304/humanitas.729077 SUBVERTING LÉVI-STRAUSS’S STRUCTURALISM: READING GENDER TROUBLE AS “TWISTED BRICOLAGE” Anlam FİLİZ1 Abstract This article critically analyzes Judith Butler’s presentation of Claude Lévi-Strauss in her book Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (1999). In this book, Butler criticizes feminists for employing Lévi-Strauss’s binary oppositions and their use of the sex/gender binary in their critique of patriarchy. Butler’s analysis provides a fruitful lens to understand how gender operates. However, as the article shows, this analysis relies on a misrepresentation of Lévi-Strauss’s take on these dualities. Employing Lévi-Strauss’s term “bricolage,” the article reads Butler’s misinterpretation as a twisted form of bricolage, which destabilizes certain assumptions in Lévi-Strauss’s structuralism. The article presents an example of how Lévi-Strauss’s structural theory has influenced not only feminist theory but also its critique. The article also aims at providing an alternative way to understand influential gender theorist Judith Butler’s misinterpretation of other scholars. 171 Keywords: Claude Lévi-Strauss, Judith Butler, Gender Trouble, twisted bricolage, structuralism, subversion LÉVI-STRAUSS’UN YAPISALCILIĞINI ALTÜST ETMEK: CİNSİYET BELASI’NI “BÜKÜLMÜŞ BRİCOLAGE” OLARAK OKUMAK Öz Bu makale, Judith Butler’ın Cinsiyet Belası: Feminizm ve Kimliğin Altüst Edilmesi (1999) adlı kitabında etkili yapısal antropolog Claude Lévi-Strauss’u sunuşunu eleştirel bir şekilde analiz eder. Bu kitapta Butler feministleri, ataerkil düzen eleştirilerinde Lévi-Strauss’un ikili karşıtlıklarını ve cinsiyet/toplumsal cinsiyet ikiliğini kullandıkları için eleştirir. Butler’ın analizi, toplumsal cinsiyetin nasıl işlediğini anlamak için verimli bir mercek sağlar.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Animal Ethics
    2. Animal ethics It was started to provide animal welfare and stop cruel practices on animals, for example factory farming, animal testing, using animals for experimentation or for entertainment. In the most of Western philosophy animals were considered as beings without moral standing, namely those that do not have to be included into our moral choices. The very typical example of this approach is the Cartesian one, according to Rene Descartes (1596-1650), animals are just simple machines that cannot experience pain. The philosopher was known for making vivisections on living animals and claiming that none of the animals could feel the pain during this. In consequence of this approach until modern times there were conducted many unnecessary and cruel experiments with animal usage, also animal’s condition at factory farms or in entrainment were terrible. All these practices caused a huge amount of suffering of animals. The approach to animals was changed with Peter Singer’s influential book on Animal Liberation (1975). Singer raised the issue that animals can suffer and amount of suffering that they experience is not worth what we gain from these cruel practices. His argumentation was utilitarian, which is one of the approaches of normative ethics. Deontological and utilitarian argumentation in animal ethics Normative ethics aims at providing moral standards that regulate right and wrong conduct. This may involve articulating the good habits that we should acquire, the duties that we should follow, or the consequences of our behavior on others. The most popular approaches to normative theory are: deonotology and conseqentialism. The word deontology derives from the Greek words for duty (deon) and science (or study) of (logos).
    [Show full text]
  • Decolonizing Knowledge and the Question of the Archive Achille Mbembe
    Decolonizing Knowledge and the Question of the Archive Achille Mbembe This document was deliberately written as a spoken text. It forms the basis of a series of public lectures given at the Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research (WISER), University of the Witwatersrand (Johannesburg), at conversations with the Rhodes Must Fall Movement at the University of Cape Town and the Indexing the Human Project, Department of Sociology and Anthropology at the University of Stellenbosch. The nature of the events unfolding in South Africa, the type of audience that attended the lectures, the nature of the political and intellectual questions at stake required an entirely different mode of address – one that could speak both to reason and to affect. Twenty one years after freedom, we have now fully entered what looks like a negative moment. This is a moment most African postcolonial societies have experienced. Like theirs in the late 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, ours is gray and almost murky. It lacks clarity. Today many want to finally bring white supremacy to its knees. But the same seem to go missing when it comes to publically condemning the extra-judicial executions of fellow Africans on the streets of our cities and in our townships. As Fanon intimated, they see no contradiction between wanting to topple white supremacy and being anti-racist while succumbing to the sirens of isolationism and national-chauvinism. Many still consider whites as “settlers” who, once in a while, will attempt to masquerade as “natives”. And yet, with the advent of democracy and the new constitutional State, there are no longer settlers or natives.
    [Show full text]
  • Guest of the Issue
    122 Guest of the Issue AVANT Volume III, Number 1/2012 www.avant.edu.pl/en 123 Mark Rowlands AVANT editors and co-workers had a chance to meet Mark Rowlands in Toruń, Poland a year ago in 2011. He gave two talks at Philosophers’ Rally , the first one on “Intentionality and the Extended Mind” (involving the discus- sion of his latest book The New Science of The Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology, 2010) and the second – less formal, on his The Philosopher and the Wolf (2008) me- moirs. Professor Rowlands is certainly a man of many (philosophical) interests. His works may be divided into three cate- gories: the philosophy of the mind and cognitive science (starting from Super- venience and Materialism (1995) and The Nature Of Consciousness (2001), followed by the 2006 and 2010 books already mentioned), ethics, the moral status of non- human animals and problems of natural environment (Animal Rights (1998), The Environmental Crisis (2000) and Animals Like Us (2002)), and broadly construed cultural criticism and philosophy 101-style books (The Philosopher at the End of the Universe (2003), Everything I Know I Learned from TV (2005) and Fame (2008)). Rowland’s article Representing without Representations published in this issue is related to his earlier book, Body Language (2006). Mark Rowlands is currently the Professor of Philosophy at the University of Miami. He began his academic career with an undergraduate degree in engineering at the University of Manchester and then switched to philosophy. He was awarded his PhD in philosophy at the University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgendering Nietzsche: Male Mothers and Phallic Women in Derrida’S Spurs
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kingston University Research Repository Transgendering Nietzsche: Male Mothers and Phallic Women in Derrida’s Spurs Willow Verkerk As Derrida himself notes, Nietzsche is a thinker who seems at once misogynistic and sympathetic (Derrida 1979, 57). Pursuing the sympathetic reading further, we may ask whether there is also an emancipatory character to Nietzsche’s writings on woman. This is a contentious question; however, it is one that Derrida entertains by his proposal that Nietzsche’s feminisms and anti-feminisms are connected or have a larger “congruence” (Derrida 1979, 57). Nietzsche’s attack on feminism is done in defence of what he and Derrida conceive to be feminine power. In Spurs this is reflected in two threads: one in which woman as a position is opened up to those who are not cisgender women; the other in which cisgender women are disciplined into femininity as their ideal location for power. Derrida draws mostly on The Gay Science but he is also interested in the Preface to Beyond Good and Evil where Nietzsche declares, “Supposing truth is a woman—what then?” Derrida turns to the Preface of Beyond in order to show that there is a close relationship between woman and truth and that Nietzsche is utilizing the concept of woman in itself (Weib an sich) in order to question the coherence of ‘Truth’ and the presumptions of the philosopher “who believes in the truth that is woman, who believes in truth just as he believes in woman” (Derrida 1979, 53).
    [Show full text]
  • Feesmustfall and Student Protests in Post-Apartheid South Africa Dillon Bergin University of Pennsylvania
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Penn Humanities Forum Undergraduate Research Undergraduate Humanities Forum 2018-2019: Stuff Fellows 5-2019 Writing, Righting, and Rioting: #FeesMustFall and Student Protests in Post-Apartheid South Africa Dillon Bergin University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/uhf_2019 Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Bergin, Dillon, "Writing, Righting, and Rioting: #FeesMustFall and Student Protests in Post-Apartheid South Africa" (2019). Undergraduate Humanities Forum 2018-2019: Stuff. 8. https://repository.upenn.edu/uhf_2019/8 This paper was part of the 2018-2019 Penn Humanities Forum on Stuff. Find out more at http://wolfhumanities.upenn.edu/annual-topics/stuff. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/uhf_2019/8 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Writing, Righting, and Rioting: #FeesMustFall and Student Protests in Post-Apartheid South Africa Disciplines Arts and Humanities Comments This paper was part of the 2018-2019 Penn Humanities Forum on Stuff. Find out more at http://wolfhumanities.upenn.edu/annual-topics/stuff. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/uhf_2019/8 University of Pennsylvania Spring 2019 Department of Comparative Literature and Literary Theory Honors Thesis Thesis Adviser: Rita Barnard Writing, Righting, and Rioting: #FeesMustFall and Student Protests in Post-Apartheid South Africa Submitted by: Dillon Bergin 4043 Iriving St. 19104 Philadelphia, PA [email protected] 2018–2019 Wolf Humanities Center Undergraduate Research Fellow If the university does not take seriously and rigorously its role as a guardian of wider civic freedoms, as interrogator of more and more complex ethical problems, as servant and preserver of deeper democratic practices, then some other regime or ménage of regimes will do it for us, in spite of us, without us.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subject of Critique Ricœur in Dialogue with Feminist Philosophers
    The Subject of Critique Ricœur in Dialogue with Feminist Philosophers Annemie Halsema VU-University Amsterdam Abstract This paper aims to show the relevance of Ricœur’s notion of the self for postmodern feminist theory, but also to critically assess it. By bringing Ricœur’s “self” into dialogue with Braidotti’s, Irigaray’s and Butler’s conceptions of the subject, it shows that it is close to the feminist self in that it is articulated into language, is embodied and not fully conscious of itself. In the course of the argument, the major point of divergence also comes to light, namely, that the former considers discourse to be a laboratory for thought experiments, while the latter consider discourse to be normative, restrictive and exclusive. In the second part, the possibility of critique and change are further developed. Ricœur does not rule out critique, rather interpretation includes distanciation and critique. Finally, his notion of productive imagination explains how new identifications become possible. Keywords: Self, Critique, Change, Irigaray, Butler Résumé Cet article vise à démontrer, en l'évaluant de manière critique, l’importance de la notion de soi chez Ricœur pour la théorie féministe postmoderne. Mettant en dialogue sa pensée avec celle de Braidotti, d’Irigaray et de Butler, l'auteure montre que la notion ricoeurienne de soi est assez proche de la pensée féministe. Car le soi est articulé dans la langue, il est incarné et pas entièrement conscient de lui-même. Après avoir cherché à montrer la proximité des deux styles de pensée, l'auteure attarde sur le point crucial de leur divergence.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals & Ethics
    v ABOUT THIS BOOK This book provides an overview of the current debates about the nature and extent of our moral obligations to animals. Which, if any, uses of animals are morally wrong, which are morally permissible (i.e., not wrong) and why? What, if any, moral obligations do we, individually and as a society (and a global community), have towards animals and why? How should animals be treated? Why? We will explore the most influential and most developed answers to these questions – given by philosophers, scientists, and animal advocates and their critics – to try to determine which positions are supported by the best moral reasons. Topics include: x general theories of ethics and their implications for animals, x moral argument analysis, x general theories of our moral relations to animals, x animal minds, and x the uses of animals for food, clothing, experimentation, entertainment, hunting, as companions or pets, and other purposes. The book offers discussion questions and paper assignments to encourage readers to develop positions on theoretical and practice issues concerning ethics and animals, give reasons for their support, and respond to possible objections and criticisms. This book is organized around an initial presentation of three of the most influential methods of moral thinking for human to human interactions. We then see how these ethical theories have been extended to apply to human to animal interactions, i.e., how humans ought to treat non-human animals. These perspectives are: x a demand for equality or equal moral consideration of interests (developed by Peter Singer); vi x a demand for respect of the moral right to respectful treatment (developed by Tom Regan); and x a demand that moral decisions be made fairly and impartially and the use of a novel thought experiment designed to ensure this (developed by Mark Rowlands, following John Rawls).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Bjabrill.Com09/27/202110026 01:27:50AM Via Free Access 2 Mcweeny
    Simone de Beauvoir Studies 31 (2020) 1–16 brill.com/sdbs Editor’s Introduction / Présentation du numéro Jennifer McWeeny Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA [email protected] The year 2020 is carving out a singular place in history, like 1939 or 1968. This is a time when current events weigh so heavily on existing structures that their supports have buckled, laying bare inefficacy and injustice just beneath the sur- face. In the midst of a global pandemic and the rise of diverse social movements protesting the unequal distribution of bodily vulnerability according to race, gender, class, and other social locations, the weaknesses inherent in our gov- ernments, healthcare systems, economies, and societies stamp our lived expe- rience with in-sight—a seeing from within the historical moment as it unfolds. That the number 2020 evokes the name for optic clarity relative to a cer- tain distance is thus fitting. With this new year, we encounter the urgency of our existential condition with 20/20 vision. The number is also a doubled one (“twenty-twenty”), an appropriate sign of the duplicitous perception common to the social media of our extended, electronic minds, where power struggles between competing political camps surround us with rhetoric, propaganda, and lies that look a lot like truth.1 Such features of our era implicate a moment of repetition—20 followed by 20—a reprise of prior histories, a twinning of spaces and times. The 2020s, like the 1920s, have come with a roar and have so far lived up to the label “les années folles” (the crazy years), albeit in a manner different from that of its namesake a century ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetarian Ecofeminism: a Review Essay
    Vegetarian Ecofeminism: A Review Essay Gaard, Greta Claire. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, Volume 23, Number 3, 2002, pp. 117-146 (Article) Published by University of Nebraska Press DOI: 10.1353/fro.2003.0006 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/fro/summary/v023/23.3gaard.html Access provided by Tsinghua University Library (23 Apr 2013 06:09 GMT) 08-N2534 1/17/03 8:47 AM Page 117 Vegetarian Ecofeminism A Review Essay greta gaard Although the roots of ecofeminism can be located in the work of women gar- deners, outdoor enthusiasts, environmental writers, botanists, scientists, ani- mal welfare activists, and abolitionists over the past two centuries, ecofemi- nism’sfirst articulation in the 1980s was shaped by the convergence of the peace, antinuclear, and feminist movements. In the past two decades ecofeminism has developed so rapidly that the time for a broad review of it has already passed; even recent taxonomies do not adequately describe its internal variations. For these reasons, I have chosen to trace the branch of ecofeminism that has been the subject of most disagreement by feminists, ecofeminists, and environmen- talists and is the least understood. This misunderstanding (and the subsequent misrepresentation) of vegetarian ecofeminism must be addressed, I will argue, because this branch of ecofeminism is the logical outgrowth of both feminism and ecofeminism. For if ecofeminism can be seen as the offspring of feminism, then vegetarian ecofeminism is surely feminism’s third generation. Since its inception ecofeminism has had a contentious relationship with the idea of animal liberation. While some ecofeminists have remained silent on the topic of animals, others have emphasized the oppression of nonhuman ani- mals (speciesism) as implicit within an ecofeminist analysis, arguing that speciesism functions like and is inherently linked to racism, sexism, classism, heterosexism, and naturism.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Canadian Journal of Disability Studies Published by the Canadian Disability Studies Association Association Canadienne des Études sur le handicap Hosted by The University of Waterloo www.cjds.uwaterloo Tricky Ticks and Vegan Quips: The Lone Star Tick and Logics of Debility Joshua Falek Gender, Feminist and Women’s Studies, York University [email protected] Cameron Butler Social Anthropology, York University [email protected] Abstract In this article, we explore the discourse around the Lone Star tick, predominately through the platform of Twitter, in order to highlight the way the tick is imagined as a potential tool for increasing veganism, as the Lone Star tick’s bite has been found to cause allergies to a carbohydrate found in red meat. In particular, the article questions why the notion of tick-as- vegan-technology is so widespread and easily called forward. In order to explain this pattern, we turn to Sunaura Taylor’s monograph, Beasts of Burden and Jasbir Puar’s notion of debility. Taylor’s monograph provides a framework for analyzing the imbrications of power between ableism and speciesism. Puar’s debility helps articulate how the imagination of widespread red meat allergies is an imagination of decapacitation. Puar’s analysis of the invisibilizing of debility also helps reveal how both ticks and humans are debilitated and instrumentalized in this articulated fantasy. We argue that the governance impulse in these discourses reflect a continued alignment with biopolitical forces that always designate some lives as worthy of care and others as useable, which is fundamentally at odds with broader goals of animal liberation.
    [Show full text]
  • Humane Intervention’: the International Protection of Animal Rights
    This is a repository copy of ‘Humane intervention’: the international protection of animal rights. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/95205/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Cochrane, A. and Cooke, S. (2016) ‘Humane intervention’: the international protection of animal rights. Journal of Global Ethics, 12 (1). pp. 106-121. ISSN 1744-9626 https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2016.1149090 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Alasdair Cochrane & Steve Cooke ‘Humane Intervention’: The International Protection of Animal Rightsi Abstract: This paper explores the international implications of liberal theories which extend justice to sentient animals. In particular, it asks whether they imply that coercive military intervention in a state by external agents to prevent, halt or minimise violations of basic animal rights (‘humane intervention’) can be justified.
    [Show full text]