<<

REVIEW

JOHN E. BURKHART, JR, BS. RRT JAMES K. STOILER, MD Supervisor, Section of Respiratory Therapy, Head, Section of Respiratory Therapy, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic. Medicine, Cleveland Clinic.

Oxygen and aerosolized : Matching the device to the patient

ABSTRACT HEN PRESCRIBING supplemental or aerosolized drugs, physicians can The variety of devices for administering choose from a range of delivery systems and devices, which differ in the amount of oxygen, supplemental oxygen and aerosolized drugs for total flow, or medication they deliver, and in hospital inpatients allows physicians to tailor the comfort level. Knowing the relative advan- tages and disadvantages of each in specific therapy to patient's needs, but presents a clinical settings enables the physician to select challenge in determining which device is best for the best therapy for each patient. In this article, we review the appropriate the individual patient. We describe the selection use, common clinical indications, and advan- process, appropriate use, and the advantages and tages and disadvantages of various supplemen- tal oxygen systems (FIGURE 1) and aerosolized disadvantages of various devices. drug delivery devices (FIGURE 2).

KEY POINTS • SUPPLEMENTAL The nasal cannula Is simple to use, inexpensive, In general, supplemental oxygen is needed if comfortable, well tolerated, and allows the patient to speak the partial pressure of arterial oxygen is less and to eat, but flow through the cannula may dry and than 60 mm Hg, the arterial oxygen saturation irritate the nasal mucous membrane and the eyes, is less than 90%, or both. With each type of especially at higher flow rates. delivery system, increasing the oxygen flow rate will increase the patient's fraction of Venturi masks allow precise control of the inspired oxygen inspired oxygen (Fl02) and therefore the level fraction, but may not provide adequate total flow for some of arterial oxygen. critically ill patients. Therefore, it is essential to select a device that can deliver the desired inspired oxygen Large-volume jet may be unheated or heated; fraction, sufficient to raise the arterial satura- the latter is preferred when secretions are thick and extra tion to at least 90%. humidification is desired. By definition, low-flow systems provide only a portion of the volume of the patient's minute ventilation (the sum of air breathed in The metered-dose with a spacer device should be over 1 minute). To make up the difference, the first choice for aerosolizing medications to the lower these systems allow room air to enter respiratory tract in cooperative adult patients. ("entrain") continuously, or include reservoirs that hold oxygen. Therefore, the fraction of inspired oxygen delivered varies not only with the flow rate of oxygen, but also with the patient's respiratory pattern.

200 CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 1998 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on October 1, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. • Supplemental oxygen delivery systems: Advantages and disadvantages LOW-FLOW SYSTEMS

One-way valves

NASAL CANNULA SIMPLE MASK PARTIAL MASK ADVANTAGES Simple and comfortable Provides higher inspired Provides inspired oxygen Easy way to deliver as at flow rates at or oxygen fraction than nasal fraction 60% to 80% much as 100% oxygen below 6 L/minute cannula, ie, up to 50% Allows speaking, eating

DISADVANTAGES Oxygen flow can dry and Common disadvantages irritate nasal mucous for simple, partial rebreathing, and nonrebreathlng masks membrane and eyes Less comfortable than nasal cannula Maximal deliverable inspired Pressure on the face and sweating within the covered area oxygen fraction is < 44% Ineffective when nasopharynx Must be removed for eating, drinking, and airway care Is occluded (eg, trauma) Inadequate flow rate increases risk of rebreathing carbon dioxide

HIGH-FLOW SYSTEMS

VENTURI MASK LARGE-VOLUME LARGE- AEROSOL SYSTEM HUMIDIFIER ADVANTAGES Delivers specific and Provides source of humidity Can deliver inspired oxygen consistent inspired System of choice following surgery fraction of 21% to 100% and flow oxygen fractions or extubatlon rates up to 150 L/minute from 24% to 50% May be used with several inter- May be used with mask, face tent, T-piece faces (eg, mask, face tent, T-piece) May be heated when extra humidification Can be modified to provide is needed (eg, thick secretions) continuous positive airway pressure Delivers inspired oxygen fractions of 21 % to (actual delivered fractions 21% to 60%)

DISADVANTAGES Same as for other masks Oxygen delivery may be inadequate for Noisy patients with high inspiratory demands

FIGURE 1

CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 1998 201 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on October 1, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. OXYGEN AND AEROSOLIZED DRUG DELIVERY BURKHART AND STOLLER

In contrast, high-flow systems provide a experience sweating within the covered area. precise and consistent concentration of oxy- Masks must be removed during eating, drink- gen at a flow rate that exceeds the patient's ing, and airway care. In addition, failure to minute ventilation by threefold to fourfold. flush exhaled carbon dioxide from the mask system can allow rebreathing of carbon diox- • LOW-FLOW OXYGEN SYSTEMS ide; therefore, adequate oxygen delivery flow rates (eg, > 5 L/minute) must be assured. Low-flow systems include the nasal cannula, A simple face mask has an oxygen entry the simple mask, the partial rebreathing mask, port and multiple exhalation ports. Simple and the nonrebreathing mask. In general, masks can deliver only moderate inspired oxy- such systems are best suited to patients whose gen fraction levels, usually between 35% and requirements for supplemental oxygen are 50% at flow rates of 5 to 10 L/minute.1'2 A modest. minimum flow of 5 L/minute is required to flush out the mask between respirations and, Nasal cannula thus, to prevent the patient from rebreathing The nasal cannula, which delivers a continu- exhaled carbon dioxide, because different ous flow of oxygen through prongs that fit in masks hold from 100 to 200 mL.1'2'6 Because the patient's nostrils, is the most frequently the mask reservoir is relatively small and used oxygen delivery system. Oxygen from the because peak inspiratory flow rates exceed the nasal cannula fills the nasopharynx and flow capacity of the mask, oxygen flow rates oropharynx, which act as a reservoir. higher than 10 L/minute generally cannot Therefore, the patient need not breathe raise the inspired oxygen fraction further.7 through the nose to receive oxygen, but the Partial rebreathing and nonrebreathing nasopharynx must be patent. Nasal cannulas masks provide higher inspired oxygen fractions deliver oxygen at rates of 1 to 6 L/minute and than nasal cannulas or simple masks. A partial inspired oxygen fractions between 24% and rebreathing mask is a simple oxygen mask with 44%.1,2 As a rule of thumb, the inspired oxy- a 1-L reservoir bag attached. It delivers an gen fraction increases by 4% with each 1-L inspired oxygen fraction of 60% to 80%, Higher increment in the delivery rate. depending on the patient's ventilatory pattern. cannula flow Advantages. The nasal cannula is simple Partial rebreathing masks, unlike nonre- to use, inexpensive, comfortable, well tolerat- breathing masks, have no one-way valves rates can ed, and allows the patient to speak and to eat. between the mask and the reservoir bag, nor irritate the Disadvantages. The oxygen flow tends to at the exhalation ports of the mask. During dry and irritate the nasal mucous membrane exhalation, approximately the first third of nasal mucosa and the eyes, especially at higher flow rates. If the tidal volume (ie, the anatomic dead space higher flow rates are needed, ie, 4 L/minute or gas) enters the reservoir bag, and the remain- more, the oxygen should be humidified.If der leaves the mask via the exhalation ports. more than 6 L/minute are needed, another During inspiration, the patient draws oxygen delivery device should be used. Another dis- from the mask, the reservoir bag, and the gas advantage is that the cannula is easily dis- entering the system. Room air may be lodged. Additionally, the inspired oxygen entrained through the mask ports. No carbon fraction depends not only on the flow rate, but dioxide should accumulate in the reservoir also on the rate and depth of respiration and bag if the oxygen flow rate to the system is the peak inspiratory flow rate,5 so that the adequate to prevent the bag from collapsing inspired oxygen concentration can vary with more than halfway during inspiration. To the respiratory pattern. achieve this, a flow rate of 8 L/minute or high- er is recommended. Masks Nonrebreathing masks, in contrast, have Masks used in supplemental oxygen therapy one-way valves between the mask and the all share several drawbacks. They are less com- reservoir bag and side ports on the mask itself. fortable than the nasal cannula. They exert On exhalation, the valves prevent the pressure on the face, and the patient may exhaled gas from entering the reservoir bag

202 CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 1998 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on October 1, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. and allow it to leave the mask. Adequate oxy- TABLE 1 gen flow flushes carbon dioxide from the Entrainment ratios and outputs mask. During inspiration, the patient draws of specific Venturi masks oxygen from the mask, the reservoir bag, and from the flow entering the system. Oxygen OXYGEN/AIR MINIMAL OXYGEN TOTAL INSPIRED flow rates higher than 10 L/minute, and occa- ENTRAINMENT FLOW FLOW OXYGEN RATIO (L/MINUTE) (L/MINUTE) FRACTION* sionally higher than 15 L/minute, are required to deliver inspired oxygen fractions between 1:25 4 104 24 80% and 100%. As a practical point, the oxy- 1:10 4 44 28 gen flow should be sufficient to prevent the 1:7 6 48 31 bag from collapsing during inspiration. 1:5 8 48 35 1:3 8 32 40 • HIGH-FLOW OXYGEN SYSTEMS 1:1.7 12 32 50 1:1 12 24 60 1:0.6 12 19 70 High-flow oxygen systems provide a patient's entire inspired volume. Examples of these sys- Variations in the inspired oxygen fraction delivered may occur because systems are tems are air entrainment or Venturi masks, disposable; for the system to be classified as high-flow, at least 40 L/minute must be large-volume aerosol systems, and large-vol- provided ume humidifier systems. As a general rule, sicker patients whose oxygen demands are higher or more precise or both will require such systems. from a large-volume aerosol system or a large- volume humidifier system. Venturi masks Venturi masks deliver a specific, consistent Large-volume aerosol systems inspired oxygen fraction by entraining a specif- Large-volume aerosol systems provide a source ic volume of room air with every liter of oxy- of moisture to humidify inspired gases and a gen that flows through the mask (FIGURE 1). relatively high gas flow to the patient. They With this system, oxygen is forced through a offer several advantages: High-flow small jet, thus accelerating the flow. The accel- • They are the oxygen delivery systems oxygen erated flow creates a negative pressure (the of choice following surgery or extubation, Venturi effect) that entrains room air through since they provide cool, moist gas which is systems a small side port. Varying the size of the jet ori- soothing to an irritated airway, decreasing provide all fice changes the velocity of the oxygen, there- mucosal edema. by affecting the amount erf room air entrained • They can be used with several inter- of a patient's and the inspired oxygen fraction. Jets that faces, such as a mask, face tent, or T-piece inspired deliver 24%, 28%, 31%, 35%, 40%, and 50% • They can be heated when extra humid- inspired oxygen fractions are available. ification is needed, such as when secretions oxygen Minimum recommended oxygen flow are thick. rates for each of the different jets (24% to However, as discussed below, oxygen 50%) are presented in TABLE 1. Of note, at the delivery may be inadequate for patients with minimum recommended oxygen flow rate, the high inspiratory demands. total flow delivered by a Venturi mask with an The most common type of aerosol system inspired oxygen fraction greater than 40% is uses a large-volume jet , consisting of less than 40 L/minute, which may be inade- a reservoir for , a jet, a capillary tube, quate for a critically ill patient. Instead, and a baffle. Most large-volume nebulizers patients with high inspiratory flow demands have solution vohimes of 0.5 to 1.5 L. This often benefit from large-volume humidifier volume, usually sterile water, allows the nebu- systems which can deliver flow rates in excess lizer to operate continually for 4 to 6 hours of 100 L/minute. A Venturi system relies on before it must be refilled. humidity contained in the entrained room air. The jet nebulizer creates an aerosol by Patients requiring humidified gas will benefit the Bernoulli principle of lowering the later-

CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 1998 203 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on October 1, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. OXYGEN AND AEROSOLIZED DRUG DELIVERY BURKHART AND STOLLER

al pressure of gas around the jet to draw solu- covered. The face tent fits under the chin and tion up the capillary tube, from which it is is open above the nose. It is also made of vinyl blasted into particles by the gas jet. The par- and has a 22-mm connector for aerosol tubing. ticles then strike a baffle, which causes larger When using an aerosol mask or face tent, the particles to drop out or to fragment into actual concentration of oxygen delivered to smaller ones. the hypopharynx may be far lower than that Most nondisposable aerosol systems offer leaving the end of the aerosol tube.9-11 fixed inspired oxygen fractions (eg, 40%, 60%, A T-piece is commonly used to deliver and 100%), whereas most disposable units aerosol to patients with an artificial airway provide a spectrum (21% to 100%) by varying such as an oral or nasal endotracheal tube or a the size of the entrainment port. As a collar is tracheostomy tube. A reservoir tube between turned, the size of the entrainment port is 6 and 18 inches in length may be added; an decreased and the inspired oxygen fraction is adequate aerosol flow rate should be main- increased. tained so that a continuous stream of aerosol is Although it was once common practice to observed exiting from the reservoir during use two aerosol units in tandem when high inspiration, thereby assuring that the patient flow and an inspired oxygen fraction greater is not rebreathing carbon dioxide and is than 60% were needed, work by Faust et al8 receiving the entire inhaled volume from the has demonstrated that this method delivers aerosol. If carbon dioxide retention does lower flow rates than expected. Thus, the cur- occur, the reservoir should be shortened or rently recommended method of delivering an removed. A disadvantage of the T-piece is that inspired oxygen fraction of 60% or greater is to it connects directly to the tracheostomy tube use a high-flow, large-volume humidifier and may pull, causing irritation and decannu- rather than an aerosol system. lation. A jet nebulizer is similar to the Venturi Tracheostomy collar or mask. If a patient mask in that as the set inspired oxygen frac- with a tracheostomy can tolerate small varia- tion is increased (by decreasing the size of the tions in inspired oxygen fraction, a tracheosto- entrainment port), the amount of room air my collar or mask is preferred. The tracheosto- Use a T-piece drawn into the mask is decreased—and so the my mask is made of vinyl and has a swiveled to deliver total amount of gas delivered to the patient 22-mm adapter for aerosol tubing. Whereas the also decreases. T-piece connects directly to the tracheostomy aerosol to Therefore, a patient's inspiratory demand tube and may cause irritation or decannula- patients with may exceed the flow available from the tion, the tracheostomy mask fits over the tra- aerosol unit, and the patient may breathe in so cheostomy tube but may not contact it. an artificial hard that room air may leak underneath the Though the tracheostomy mask decreases airway aerosol mask or tent. Thus, as noted above, for torque on the tracheostomy tube, it is easily patients who require high flow and a high displaced from the neck site. inspired oxygen fraction, a large-volume, Large-volume jet nebulizers may be high-flow humidifier system is more effective unheated or heated; the latter is preferred than an aerosol system. when secretions are thick and extra humidifi- The aerosol reaches the patient by one of cation is desired. The aerosol output of several interfaces. unheated nebulizers ranges from 5.6 to 7.0 The aerosol mask, made of vinyl, has a L/minute, and the output of heated nebulizers 22-mm connector to attach the large-bore is greater. The heaters generally slip over the corrugated tubing from the nebulizer. There neck of the nebulizer and heat only a small are two holes in the mask for exhalation and portion of the solution just before nebuliza- escape of excess flow. The face mask may be tion. These units are generally left unheated used for a spontaneously breathing patient when used with a face mask or tent because without an artificial airway. patients often do not tolerate inspiring warm, A face tent may be used instead of a full- moist air. However, some patients with artifi- face aerosol mask for patients who are uncom- cial airways require higher humidity because fortable having both their mouth and nose the upper airway has been bypassed.

204 CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 1998 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on October 1, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. Large-volume humidifier systems held nebulizers, all have basically the same High-flow humidifier systems can provide a features: a 5- to 30-mL medication cup, a jet, spectrum of inspired oxygen fraction values a capillary tube, a baffle, and a gas delivery (21% to 100%) at flow rates up to 150 tube. L/minute, much higher than the large-volume The most common interface is the aerosol system. They can deliver gas that is mouthpiece, with a 4- to 6-inch length of cool or heated via a face mask, artificial air- reservoir tubing placed distal to the nebulizer way, or T-piece. to increase the volume of aerosol available The oxygen or air-oxygen mixture is gen- with each . An aerosol mask may erated hy dual air and oxygen flow meters, an also be used, but the patient should be air-oxygen blender, or an adjustable flow gen- instructed to breathe through an open mouth erator. The gas mixture then passes through a to minimize deposition of the drug in the nose large-volume humidifier and on to the patient and nasopharynx. For patients with an artifi- via large-bore tubing. When attached to an cial airway, a T-piece or tracheostomy mask artificial airway, a 10- to 15-inch reservoir may be used. tube is normally used to ensure that room air The small-volume nebulizer should be is not entrained through the open port of the operated at gas flows of 6 to 8 L/minute and T-piece. Such a system is the most accurate with a total solution volume of about 4 mL to and precise method of delivering an inspired optimize the volume of drug delivered.15'16 oxygen fraction of 60% or greater. It is the The sides of the nebulizer should be periodi- preferred system for patients requiring a high cally tapped until no aerosol is produced; this inspired oxygen fraction and high flow, and is minimizes the dead volume, ie, the volume of capable of delivering 100% oxygen at flow solution that remains in the nebulizer. rates approaching 150 L/minute.8 The patient should inhale slowly (0.5 High-flow humidifier systems can be L/second) at normal tidal volume, and occa- modified to deliver continuous positive airway sionally take a deep inspiration and hold it for pressure (CPAP) via mask or artificial airway. 4 to 10 seconds.17 However, even with opti- The main drawback to such systems is the mal technique, only about 9% to 12% of the excessive noise created as gas flows through drug placed in the nebulizer is actually deliv- Patients using them at 80 to 100 L/minute. For these reasons, ered to the lower respiratory tract.>4,18,19 a nebulizer patient tolerance and compliance with high- Advantages of small-volume nebulizers flow systems is often low. include: should • Ease of administration. Once the occasionally • AEROSOLIZED DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES device is set up, aerosolized medications can be delivered for prolonged periods with tidal take a deep Three types of delivery devices are used most breathing. breath and often to deliver medications to the lower res- • Capability to aerosolize large volumes: piratory tract in adults: 15 to 20 mL/hour for jet nebulizers. hold it • Small-volume nebulizers. • Ability to deliver medications not • Metered-dose . available in metered-dose inhaler or dry pow- • Dry inhalers. der inhaler form.20 All these devices generate particles with a Disadvantages, as noted above, include median diameter of 2 to 5 pm.12-1^ FIGURE 2 lists low deposition of the medication in the the advantages and disadvantages of each of with tidal breathing, the consequent need for the aerosol drug delivery devices. higher doses and longer administration times, and the associated costs. In addition, there is Small-volume nebulizers a risk of bacterial contamination20 if the A small-volume nebulizer is a jet nebulizer reservoir is not adequately cleared. powered by a compressed gas source and pro- duces an aerosol much like the large-volume Metered-dose inhalers aerosol system previously described. Small- Metered-dose inhalers are often preferred as a volume nebulizers, sometimes called hand- cost-saving alternative to small-volume nebu-

CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 1998 205 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on October 1, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. M Aerosolized drug delivery systems: Advantages and disadvantages

METERED-DOSE METERED-DOSE INHALER DRY POWDER NEBULIZER INHALER WITH SPACING DEVICE INHALER

ADVANTAGES Less patient coordination Convenient Less patient coordination Less patient required Inexpensive required coordination High doses possible required (even continuous doses) Breath-holding not No chlorofluorocarbon required release No chlorofluoro- carbon release

DISADVANTAGES Expensive Patient coordination Releases chlorofluoro- Requires high Wasteful required carbons inspiratory flow Contamination is possible Patient activation Less portable than the Most units are if not carefully cleaned required simple metered-dose single-dose inhaler Pressurized gas source Results in pharyngeal Can result in required deposition pharyngeal More time required Potential for abuse deposition for medication delivery Difficult to deliver high Not all medications doses available Not all medications Difficult to deliver available high doses

FIGURE 2

lizers.21 A metered-dose inhaler is a pressur- inspiration should be held approximately 4 to ized canister that contains a medication and 10 seconds to aid particle deposition. propellant. Actuation of the metered-dose The bronchodilatation that follows the inhaler releases a prescribed quantity of med- initial actuation can augment the effect of ication in a volume of inert gas. Average later actuations. Ideally, an interval of 3 to 10 deposition in the is 10% to 25% of the minutes should separate successive actuations, total dose.22'23 but a 1-minute interval is generally more prac- Proper technique for using a metered-dose tical.26-28 inhaler is essential to ensure drug delivery and One limitation of the metered-dose requires both ample instruction by the care- inhaler is the difficulty patients—particularly giver and a return demonstration by the children—have in achieving the hand-breath patient, to confirm that he or she can use the coordination required for ideal technique. device correctly.24.25 Also, the high velocity with which the parti- The device should be held before an open cles exit the metered-dose inhaler cause mouth and actuated near the beginning of a impaction on the mouth and oropharynx, pre- complete slow inspiration from functional disposing to thrush when corticosteroids are residual capacity. Such slow inspiration helps delivered. to maintain a more laminar flow and, there- Spacer devices. A spacer device for use fore, deeper particle deposition. Ideally, the with metered-dose inhalers is a holding cham-

CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 1998 206 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on October 1, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. ber with a one-way valve designed to optimize need to insert the gelatin , which can drug delivery. Many different types of com- pose difficulty for patients with poor dexterity, mercial spacers are available. Deposition of such as those with arthritis. Also, airway irri- the aerosolized medication via the metered- tation from the dry powder and reactions to dose inhaler into the spacer allows large parti- lactose or glucose carriers have been cles to impact and evaporate, thereby reducing described.22'29 Currently, only cromolyn sodi- particle size, enhancing delivery to the lower um and albuterol are available as dry powder airway, and lessening pharyngeal impaction. inhalers in the United States. For this reason, spacers are recommended for In recommending aerosolized drug deliv- use with metered-dose inhaler delivery of cor- ery devices, the clinician must choose the ticosteroids. The spacer also eliminates the device that best meets the patient's needs. In need for the patient to coordinate actuation general, however, the metered-dose inhaler and inhalation.24 The mouthpiece should be with a spacer device should be the first choice placed in the mouth with the lips tightly for aerosolizing medications in cooperative sealed around it. Then the patient exhales adult patients on the grounds of convenience, fully into the spacer. The inhaler may then be cost, and effectiveness. II activated any time before the patient begins a slow, deep inspiration. • REFERENCES Advantages of metered-dose inhalers 1. Fulmer JD, Snider GL. ACCP-NHLBI National Conference include shorter treatment times, lower cost, on Oxygen Therapy, Chest 1984; 86:234-247. (Concurrent publication in Respir Care 1984; 29:919-935). and greater convenience compared with 2. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Oxygen therapy and small-volume nebulizers. the acute care hospital. Respir Care 1991; 36:1410-1413. Disadvantages include patient difficulty 3. Estey W. Subjective effects dry versus humidified low-flow oxygen. Respir Care 1980; 25:1143-1144. coordinating taking a deep breath while acti- 4. Campbell E. Baker D, Crites-Silver P. Subjective effects of vating the inhaler when not using the spacer oxygen for delivery by nasal cannula: A prospective study. device, and the use of chlorofluorocarbons as Chest 1988: 86:241-247. 5. Meredith RL, Stoller JK. Oxygen therapy. In: Parsons P, propellants, though manufacturers are gradu- Heffner JE, editors. Pulmonary and Respiratory Therapy ally adopting propellants free of chlorofluoro- Secrets. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, Inc. 1996; 108. carbons. 6. Jensen AG, Johnson A, Sandstedt S. Rebreathing during Prescribe a oxygen treatment with face mask. The effect of oxygen flow rates on ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; spacer device Dry powder inhalers 35:289-292. Dry powder inhalers are breath-actuated 7. Kacmarek RM. Supplemental oxygen and other medical with metered- gas therapy. In: Pierson DJ, Kacmarek RM, editors. devices that use a gelatin capsule containing a Foundations of Respiratory Care. New York: Churchill dose inhaled single dose of medication and a carrier sub- Livingstone, 1992: 859-889. stance to assist dispersion of the drug. The 8. Foust GN, Potter WA, Wilson MD, et al. Shortcomings of corticosteroids using two jet nebulizers in tandem with an aerosol face capsule is inserted into the device and punc- mask for optimal aerosol therapy. Chest 1991: tured. The patient then places the inhaler in 99:1346-1351. the mouth and inhales rapidly (at a rate faster 9. Monast RL, Kaye W. Problems in delivering desired oxy- gen concentration from jet nebulizers to patients via face than 60 L/minute) through the device, which tents. Respir Care 1984; 29:994-1000. disperses the dry particles and draws them into 10. Gibson RL, Comer PB, Beckman RW, et al. Actual tracheal the lower airways. Inhalation is repeated until oxygen concentrations with commonly used oxygen equipment. Anesthesiology 1976; 44:71-73. the capsule is empty. 11. Goldstein RS, Young JH, Robuck AS. Effect of breathing Advantages. No breath-holding is neces- pattern on oxygen concentration received from standard sary. Because the dry powder inhaler is breath- face masks. Lancet 1982; 2:1188-1190. 12. Dolovich M. Clinical aspects of aerosol physics. Respir Care actuated, no hand-breath coordination is 1991; 36:931-938. needed. Also, unlike metered-dose inhalers, 13. Dolovich M. Physical principles underlying aerosol thera- dry powder inhalers do not require chlorofluo- py. J Aerosol Med 1989; 2:171-186. 14. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Selection of aerosol rocarbon propellants. delivery device. Respir Care 1992; 37:891-897. Disadvantages. As with metered-dose 15. Hess D, Horney D, Snyder T. Evaluation of hand held inhalers, dry powder inhalers allow substantial function. Respir Care 1989; 34:717-723. 16. Xu JB, Yu CP. The effects of age on deposition of inhaled oropharyngeal impaction. One additional aerosols in the human lung. Aerosol Sci Technol 1986; issue with dry powder inhaler devices is the 5:349-357.

CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 1998 207 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on October 1, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. BURKHART AND ST0LLER

17. Vidgren M. Factors influencing lung deposition of inhaled aerosols. Eur Respir J 1994; 4:68-70. 18. Newman SP. Aerosol deposition considerations in inhala- tion therapy. Chest 1985; 88:152S-162S. 19. Lewis RA, Fleming JS. Fractional deposition from a jet nebulizer: How it differs from a metered-dose inhaler. Respir Med 1985; 79:361-367. 20. AARC Aerosol Consensus Statement—1991. Respir Care 1991; 36:916-921 21 Orens DK, Kester L, Fergus LC, Stoller JK. Cost impact of metered-dose inhalers vs small volume nebulizers in hos- pital patients: The Cleveland Clinic experience. Respir Care 1991; 36:1099-1104. 22. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Selection of an aerosol The uses : delivery device for neonatal and pediatric patients. Respir Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Care 1995; 40(12):1325-1335. the AMA's database of physician names and addresses. 23. Newman SP. Aerosol generators and delivery systems. (All physicians are included in the AMA database, not Respir Care 1991; 36:939-951. just members of the AMA.) Only the AMA can update 24. Kacmarek RM, Hess D. The interface between patient and this data, and will accept a change-of-address notice only aerosol generator. Respir Care 1991; 36:952-976. 25. Cleveland Clinic Department of Pulmonary and Critical from you. Care Medicine, Section of Respiratory Therapy. Metered- Re sure your primary specialty and type of practice also are dose inhaler instructions (patient education material). up-to-date on AMA records. This information is impor- 1996. tant in determining who receives the Cleveland Clinic 26. Kacmarek RM. Humidity and aerosol therapy. In Pierson DJ, Kacmarek RM, editors. Foundations of Respiratory Jiiumal of Medicine. Care. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1992: 793-824. If you have ever notified the AMA that you did not want 27. Heimer D, Shim C, Williams H. The effects of sequential to receive mail, you will not receive the Cleveland Clinic of metaproterenol aerosol in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1980; 66:75-77. Journal of Medicine. You can reverse that directive hy noti- 28. Pederson S. The Importance of a pause between the fying the AMA. Please note that a change of address with inhalations of two puffs of terbutaline from a pressurized the AMA will redirect all medically related mailings to the aerosol with a tube spacer. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986; new location. 77:505-509. 29. Crompton GK. Clinical use of dry powder systems. Eur J Respir Dis 1982; 122 (Suppl):96s-99s. FOR FASTER SERVICE • PHONE 312-464-5192 ADDRESS: James K. Stoller, MD, Section of Respiratory • FAX 312-464-5827 Therapy, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, • E-MAIL [email protected] A90, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, e-mail [email protected]. or send a recent mailing label along with new information to: AMA DEPARTMENT OF DATA SERVICES 515 North State Street Chicago, IL 60610 NEW INFORMATION J^JJJ^IL

STREET ADDRESS

IN THIS ISSUE STATE ZIP PAGE 174 Please allow 6 to 8 weeks for change to take effect

CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 65 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 1998 36 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on October 1, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission.