Leveraged Buyout Model: Adding Preferred Stock

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leveraged Buyout Model: Adding Preferred Stock A Simple Model Leveraged Buyout Model: Adding Preferred Stock NOTES TO ACCOMPANY VIDEOS These notes are intended to supplement the videos on ASimpleModel.com. They are not to be used as stand‐alone study aids, and are not written as comprehensive overviews of the topic detailed. The purpose of these notes is to provide a tangible collection of the visuals used in the videos with comments highlighting the more important aspects covered. 2016 A Simple Model, LLC. All rights reserved. Leveraged Buyout Model 008 Adding Preferred Stock Preface to Notes: At times I find it is easier to explain a new concept by limiting the number of variables in the model, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that what is modeled is practical. In this video, to introduce preferred stock, I reduce common equity to zero and move the entire balance to preferred stock to make the instruction easier to follow. I want to emphasize that you are not likely to find a company with this equity structure. A company that has issued preferred stock has generally issued common stock as well. You are also unlikely to have preferred stock issued with warrants attached that, once exercised, provide the right to purchase 100% of the common shares. The intention of this video is not to present a realistic equity structure. The objective is to focus on the mechanics of adding preferred stock to a financial model, and explain why it is important to know if any associated dividend is paid in cash or accrued, and explain why it is important if the preferred shares are convertible or offered with warrants. The materials associated with this video provide a condensed overview of preferred stock highlighting only the most important characteristics to be aware of when you are building a simple leveraged buyout model. Vocabulary: Preferred Stock - A class of ownership that has a claim on the assets and earnings of a business ahead of common stock. Preferred stock is issued with a face value and generally pays or accrues a dividend as a percent of face value. Convertible Preferred Stock – If the shares of preferred stock issued are convertible, it means that at the option of the security holder, or the option of the board of directors, or at a predetermined date, the preferred stock shares can be converted into shares of common stock. • Assume you hold one share of convertible preferred stock issued at $1,000 that has a conversion privilege stating you can convert your share of preferred stock into 100 shares of common stock. If the value of common starts trading above $10 ($1,000/100) you might consider converting. Warrants – As it relates to this video, a warrant provides the right to purchase a security at a predetermined price. Preferred stock can be issued with warrants attached permitting the purchase of common stock. • Warrants, like options, are issued with a strike price (or exercise price) and expiration date. When a business is sold (exit year in the LBO model), the warrants are sold for the value per share of the common stock less the exercise price. This video instruction, and the associated financial template, do not account for the exercise price. This is an oversimplified approach, and assumes an exercise price of zero. 2 A Simple Model Leveraged Buyout Model 008 Adding Preferred Stock Video: As we continue to move forward with this series, I intend to emulate (as much as possible) financial modeling exercises as you might experience them on the job. Most instructional videos, including many on this website, work through the entire model from beginning to end in perfect sequence. This is helpful because it teaches you an order that helps novices think about the structure of a financial model, but a lot of financial modeling real-world exercises do not take this approach. Whether you are building your own template, or working with a pre-established template, eventually most of the changes you make will be updates or edits. That is the approach described here. You might, for example, evaluate a transaction and conclude that the scenarios you are running through the model have changed, and that the limited partners (LPs) are to be offered preferred stock in place of common stock. In this situation it would be a terrible use of your time to rebuild the model, and this is precisely why it is so important to understand how everything is linked. Adding preferred stock to the model is reduced to a quick exercise if you know how all of the financial statements and supporting schedules will be impacted before you even get started. In this exercise, the financial statements and schedules requiring updates are as follows (worksheets requiring updates are indicated by purple shading): 3 A Simple Model Leveraged Buyout Model 008 Adding Preferred Stock In this video we introduce preferred stock: a class of ownership that has a claim on the assets and earnings of a business ahead of common stock. Preferred stock generally pays or accrues a dividend. So while it is viewed as a safer security, because its claims on the business are senior to those of common shareholders, it may have more limited upside. Preferred stock, however, may be offered with a variety of terms. In an LBO transaction it is not uncommon to see preferred stock offered with the potential for additional participation in the ownership of the business. To achieve this objective preferred stock is typically offered one of two ways: 1. As a convertible security (preferred shares can be exchanged for common shares). 2. With warrants attached (the right to purchase common shares at a predetermined price). In the video and in the associated Excel file, the second option is modeled. You will notice on the Exit Analysis tab that in the return profile the sum of preferred stock and accrued dividends are returned to the investor (see red box): In addition to principal redeemed, the investor also benefits from warrants, which once exercised, provide the right to purchase 100% of the common shares. I want to emphasize that this is not a realistic scenario. It was modeled this way to make the instruction easier to follow and to highlight the difference between (1) preferred stock with warrants attached, (2) convertible preferred stock, and (3) common stock. In the video example, had the preferred stock issued been convertible, the line for “Principal Repayment” in the image above would show a value of zero. This is less attractive to an investor because the distributions associated with the return of principal and accrued dividends are senior to distributions associated with common ownership. To illustrate the difference between preferred stock with warrants and common stock, we will walk through an example on the page that follows. 4 A Simple Model Leveraged Buyout Model 008 Adding Preferred Stock Self-Study Exercise: To understand the difference go through the following steps in the model: 1. Adjust the Sources and Uses tab so that inputs for Common and Preferred Stock each equal half of the total equity raised. 2. Adjust the Exit Analysis tab so that both Common and Preferred Stock have a 50% ownership position. What you will notice is that the 50% of equity proceeds is calculated after the face value of preferred stock and accrued dividends have been subtracted from the balance. Value of preferred stock and accrued dividends subtracted from proceeds. 50% Warrants + Principal Repayment For this reason, the preferred stock with warrants will be more valuable than common stock in this model. To quantify this difference take a look at the return profiles (green boxes). It is also the reason that you should pay very close attention to offerings. Small differences in language can be incredibly meaningful. 5 A Simple Model Leveraged Buyout Model 008 Adding Preferred Stock This begs the question: What additional vocabulary should I be aware of as it relates to preferred stock offerings? There are a lot of variations, but as it relates to financial modeling whether or not it converts and how the dividend is paid are possibly the most important. With respect to the latter, you may have noticed in the video that there is an option to pay a cash dividend or a Payment-in-Kind dividend. 1. Cash dividends are straightforward. Here the shareholder receives the dividend, as a percentage of face value, in cash. 2. Payment-in-Kind dividends are accrued as additional securities of the same class. This is a good place to revisit some of the changes made to the model. To adjust the LBO template for the payment of dividends very few adjustments were made to the financial statements, and there are really only three changes that we need to focus on to understand how the model balances (accounting equation holds true). 1. First, we added a line on the balance sheet under the equity account for preferred stock. When dividends are paid in cash, this line item remains constant. PIK dividends, however, increase the face value of preferred stock. 2. Second, we subtracted both cash and PIK dividends from retained earnings. Recall that on the debt schedule the calculation works out such that only one of the two types of dividends is paid. Regardless of which is paid, however, the value of retained earnings is reduced. 3. Third, we included a line for cash dividends under cash flow from financing activities. (Notice that there is no line for PIK dividends on the cash flow statement.) So when a PIK dividend is accrued, the face value of preferred stock increases on the balance sheet under the equity account, and retained earnings is reduced by the same amount.
Recommended publications
  • Data Integrity in Financial Modeling
    Data Integrity in Financial Modeling By Eric Kolchinsky, NAIC Director, Structured Securities fundamental assumptions of statistics and how they can Group limit the usefulness of financial models. Next, we review the differences between the mortgage loan information used to Introduction analyze pre-crisis RMBS and the loans’ true characteristics. With the benefit of hindsight, we can see 2009 was the be- Lastly, we discuss how the SSG and the Valuation of Securi- ginning of a slow recovery from the nadir of the recent global ties (E) Task Force are working to ensure the appropriate financial crisis. However, as the mortgage-induced crisis con- use of financial models for structured securities purchased tinued, the NAIC took a brave and a radical step—no longer by insurance companies. were ratings to be used to set the capital for residential mort- gage-backed securities (RMBS). RMBS, along with collateral- “Garbage in, Garbage out” ized debt obligations (CDOs), were at the epicenter of the crisis and had leveled financial giants such as Bear Stearns, “Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG. figures, will the right answers come out?” —Question posed to Charles Babbage, the creator of The NAIC decided to directly engage analytical vendors who the first mechanical computer. would work under the direct supervision of the Securities Valuation Office (SVO). PIMCO was chosen as the vendor for It is a common failure of human nature to find purpose in RMBS and, the following year, BlackRock Solutions was cho- complexity, and financial models are not immune.
    [Show full text]
  • Preqin Special Report: Subscription Credit Facilities
    PREQIN June 2019 SPECIAL REPORT: SUBSCRIPTION CREDIT FACILITIES PREQIN SPECIAL REPORT; SUBSCRIPTION CREDIT FACILITIES Contents 3 CEO’s Foreword 4 Subscription Credit Facility Usage in Private Capital 7 Subscription Lines of Credit and LP-GP Alignment: ILPA’s Recommendations - ILPA 8 Are Subscription Facilities Oversubscribed? - Fitch Ratings 10 Subscription Finance Market - McGuireWoods LLP Download the Data Pack All of the data presented in this report is available to download in Excel format: www.preqin.com/SCF19 As with all our reports, we welcome any feedback you may have. To get in touch, please email us at: [email protected] 2 CEO's Foreword Subscription credit facilities: angels or demons? A legitimate and valuable tool for managing liquidity and streamlining transactions in a competitive market, or a cynical ploy for massaging IRRs? The debate continues in private equity and wider private capital circles. As is often the case, historical perspective is helpful. Private capital operates in a dynamic and competitive environment, as GPs and LPs strive to achieve superior net returns, through good times and bad. Completing deals and generating the positive returns that LPs Mark O’Hare expect has never been more challenging than it is CEO, Preqin today, given the availability of capital and the appetite for attractive assets in the market. Innovation and answers: transparent data, combined with thoughtful dynamism have long been an integral aspect of the communication and debate. private capital industry’s arsenal of tools, comprised of alignment of interest; close attention to operational Preqin’s raison d’être is to support and serve the excellence and value add; over-allocation in order to alternative assets industry with the best available data.
    [Show full text]
  • Sr. Financial Analyst/Underwriter Portfolio Management & Project
    Job Opening November 10, 2014 JOB TITLE: Sr. Financial Analyst/Underwriter LOCATION: NYC DEPARTMENT: Portfolio Management & Project Finance BASIC FUNCTION: Conduct financial and credit analysis of commercial/real estate developments and operating companies to determine amount of State support required and to structure loans, grants, disposition of State assets and other subsidies accordingly. WORK PERFORMED: Review and analyze financial statements to determine the creditworthiness of all commercial loan originations. Obtain financial projections and create cash flow models for operating companies and real estate developments. Perform site visits and conduct interviews with counter parties. Perform risk assessment of credit and collateral ensuring loan stability and sound credit quality. Draft loan reports and present to the board for approval. Research, develop and implement programs that promote economic development. Create financial products which help fill funding gaps and the market. Develop revenue generating ideas such as loans, credit enhancements, etc. Provide high-level financial analysis assistance to various other departments, including real estate, venture capital and loans & grants, in addition to other governmental agencies. Critically analyze large-scale development projects throughout New York State and help structure potential loans, grants and other state subsides. Perform sensitivity analyses and initiate financial feasibility studies on complex business development proposals. Conduct site visits to borrowers and grantees for continued engagement and research. Cultivate relations with small/mid-size, regional banks, CDFIs, local development agencies and industry organizations and form partnerships to help businesses in New York State to grow and prosper. Attend various conferences and seminars to establish new contacts and discover new opportunities. EDUCATION & REQUIREMENTS: Education Level required: MBA in Finance or Real Estate desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing the Employee Purchase of Employer Company Stock—Part II
    VOL. 13, ISSUE NO. 4 OCTOBER 2010 Valuing the Employee Purchase of Employer Company Stock—Part II by Robert F. Reilly 8. Protective provisions and veto rights; 9. Board participation rights; Editor’s Note : The previous installment of this series sum- 10. Drag-along rights; marized the generally accepted valuation approaches related 11. Right to participate in future equity offerings; to the employee purchase of employer company stock. This 12. Right of fi rst refusal in future equity offerings; installment summarizes the impact of security-specifi c con- 13. Management rights; tractual rights and privileges on the employer stock valuation . 14. Access to information rights; and 15. Tag-along rights. Contractual Rights and Privileges Some contractual rights and privileges can separately (and Each of the above-listed contractual rights may relate to a materially) impact the stock value in an employee stock pur- particular class of employer company equity. More com- chase, as well as have an effect on the stock marketability and monly, these particular rights and privileges may only relate, control attributes. The valuation analyst should ensure that by contract, to a particular block of the company stock. For the value increment associated with contractual rights is not example, that block of stock may be the stock sold to the double-counted (i.e., both considered as a marketability/con- general employee group, the stock granted to identifi ed senior trol attribute and then added again as a contractual attribute). executives, or the stock retained by certain members of the company founding family. Each of these contractual rights and The analyst should also ensure that the full value increment privileges has a value.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Finance
    Project finance From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Project finance is the long term financing of infrastructure and industrial projects based upon the projected cash flows of the project rather than the balance sheets of the project sponsors. Usually, a project financing structure involves a number of equity investors, known as sponsors, as well as a syndicate of banks that provide loans to the operation. The loans are most commonly non-recourse loans, which are secured by the project assets and paid entirely from project cash flow, rather than from the general assets or creditworthiness of the project sponsors, a decision in part supported by financial modeling.[1] The financing is typically secured by all of the project assets, including the revenue-producing contracts. Project lenders are given a lien on all of these assets, and are able to assume control of a project if the project company has difficulties complying with the loan terms. Generally, a special purpose entity is created for each project, thereby shielding other assets owned by a project sponsor from the detrimental effects of a project failure. As a special purpose entity, the project company has no assets other than the project. Capital contribution commitments by the owners of the project company are sometimes necessary to ensure that the project is financially sound. Project finance is often more complicated than alternative financing methods. Traditionally, project financing has been most commonly used in the mining, transportation, telecommunication and public utility industries. More recently, particularly in Europe, project financing principles have been applied to public infrastructure under public± private partnerships (PPP) or, in the UK, Private Finance Initiative (PFI) transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Finance Course Outline
    PROJECT FINANCE COURSE OUTLINE Term: Spring 2009 (1st half-semester) Instructor: Adjunct Prof. Donald B. Reid Time: Office: KMEC 9-95, 212-759-5655 Classroom: Email: [email protected] Admin aide: Contact: [email protected] Background Project finance is used on a global basis to finance over $300 billion of capital- intensive projects annually in industries such as power, transportation, energy, chemicals, and mining. This increasingly critical, financial technique relies on non- recourse, risk-mitigated cash flows of a specific project, not the balance sheet or corporate guarantee of a sponsor, to support the funding, using a broad-based set of inter-disciplinary skills Not all projects can support project financing. Project finance is a specialized financial tool necessitating an in-depth understanding of markets, technology, sponsors, offtakers, contracts, operators, and financial structuring. It is important to understand the key elements that support a project financing and how an investor or lender can get comfortable with making a loan or investment. Several industries will be used to demonstrate project-financing principles, with emphasis on one of the most important, power. Objective of the Course The purpose of the course is to understand what project finance is, its necessary elements, why it is used, how it is used, its advantages and its disadvantages. At the end of the course, students should be able to identify projects that meet the essential criteria for a project financing and know how to create the structure for a basic project financing. The course will study the necessary elements critical to project financing to include product markets, technology, sponsors, operators, offtakers, environment, consultants, taxes and financial sources.
    [Show full text]
  • FINANCIAL MODELING, INTERVIEW PREP, and TECHNICAL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 1 Bridging the Gap: Financial Modeling, Interview Prep, and Technical Skills Development
    BRIDGING THE GAP: FINANCIAL MODELING, INTERVIEW PREP, AND TECHNICAL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 1 Bridging the Gap: Financial Modeling, Interview Prep, and Technical Skills Development Training programs for post-secondary students seeking roles in business and corporate finance EXPERTS IN FINANCIAL MODELING TRAINING [email protected] · +1 416 583 1802 WWW.MARQUEEGROUP.CA BRIDGING THE GAP: FINANCIAL MODELING, INTERVIEW PREP, AND TECHNICAL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 2 About The Marquee Group Our Clients We believe that spreadsheet- based financial models are For several years, Marquee has led the annual the most important tools in training programs at numerous investment modern finance. Using our banks, pension funds and commercial banks. framework and discipline We have taught thousands of professionals all to develop best-in-class, across Canada, the United States, the United user-friendly models, we Kingdom, Mexico, Australia and China. help students and finance The following table highlights some of our professionals turn their models major clients: into powerful communication tools that lead to better, more UNIVERSITIES effective decisions. Acadia University Saint Mary’s University Brandeis University U of T - Rotman The Marquee Group is the only Dalhousie - Rowe UBC dedicated financial modeling firm HEC Waterloo in Canada. For over a decade, our McGill - Desautels Western - Ivey business has delivered what has McMaster - DeGroote York - Schulich become the industry standard Queen’s - Smith in financial modeling, training, SOCIETIES FINANCIAL consulting
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Modeling for Investments and Corporate Finance FIN 5115
    Financial Modeling for Investments and Corporate Finance FIN 5115-701 Fall 2017 Instructor: Professor Bora Ozkan Office hours: WebEx Tuesdays 7:00 pm – 8:00 pm or by appointment Office Location: Alter Hall 438 Class Sessions: Alter 132 (6:00PM – 8:30PM): 9/14, 9/28, 10/12, 11/2, 11/16, 12/7 WebEx (6:05 – 8:35PM): 9/21, 10/5, 10/19, 11/9, 11/30, 12/14 Contact Information: [email protected] or office: 215-204-8409 Preferred Method of Contact: Email WebEx Link: foxsbm.webex.com Course Description: Financial modeling is building an abstract representation of the relationships among the variables of financial problems. This course presents the paradigms of finance through the use of state-of-art technology. Emphasis on spreadsheet programming develops an understanding of financial models and the ability to work with those models. The objective of this course is to learn equity valuation methods of a firm from a practical framework. Students should expect the workload for this course to be demanding therefore it is only recommended for those students who are interested in learning valuation techniques in depth. This course will tackle common financial problems -ranging from the simple NPV analysis to the relatively more complex Enterprise Value, and help the students gain the necessary competencies in building appropriate financial models for each case. The course covers a variety of modeling techniques, such as sensitivity and scenario analysis, optimization methods, and regression analysis. Although, students learn to use alternative financial models to analyze various decision-making opportunities, the aim is to get the students to the skill level where they can model and solve most financial problems they will face in the business world.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Financial and Economic Modeling for Utility Regulators
    An Introduction to Financial and Economic Modeling for Utility Regulators Antonio Estache (World Bank and ECARES, Universite Libre de Bruxelles) Martín Rodríguez Pardina (CEER, Universidad Argentina de la Empresa and Macroenergía S.A.) José María Rodríguez (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba y Macroenergía S.A.) Germán Sember (Macroenergía S.A.) World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3001, March 2003 The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the view of the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent. Policy Research Working Papers are available online at http://econ.worldbank.org. The paper has benefited from discussions with Ian Alexander, Tony Gomez-Ibanez, Javier Campos, Claude Crampes, Severine Dinghem, Phil Gray, Luis Guasch, Clive Harris, Jean- Jacques Laffont, Paul Noumba, Jordan Schwartz, Gaétane Tracz and Lourdes Trujillo. It represents the views of its authors and any mistake is their responsibility. It does not represent the views of the institutions they are affiliated with. A companion CD-ROM is available from the World Bank Instittute. 1 Table of Content 1. Introduction............................................................................................................2 2. What Are Regulatory Models?...............................................................................3 3. The Demand for Analytical Regulatory Processes ................................................6 4. Matching Regulatory Objectives and Instruments...............................................10 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Finance Institute® Financial Modeling & Valuation Analyst Program
    Corporate Finance Institute® Financial Modeling & Valuation Analyst Program Table of Contents CFI Program in Financial Modeling & Valuation 04 Program Overview 05 Curriculum 06 Graduation Requirements 06 Optional Prerequisites 07 Program Core Courses 08 Overview Elective Courses 09 Learning Objectives 10 Why Certification is Necessary 12 Technical Requirements 13 Tuition 13 Accounting Fundamentals 14 Reading Financial Statements 15 Fixed Income Fundamentals 16 Level 1 Excel Crash Course 17 Courses Introduction to Corporate Finance 18 Math for Corporate Finance 19 Financial Modeling Fundamentals 20 Financial Analysis Fundamentals 21 corporatefinanceinstitute.com 2 Table of Contents Building a Financial Model in Excel 22 Business Valuation 23 Level 2 Budgeting and Forecasting 24 Courses Rolling 12-month Cash Flow Forecast 25 Behavioural Finance Fundamentals 26 Sensitivity Analysis for Financial Modeling 27 Advanced Excel Formulas 28 Excel Dashboards & Data Visualization 29 Real Estate Financial Modeling 30 Level 3 Startup / e-Commerce Financial Model 31 Courses Mining Financial Model & Valuation 32 Financial Modeling using VBA 33 Advanced Financial Modeling – Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) 34 corporatefinanceinstitute.com 3 CFI Program in Financial Modeling & Valuation Corporate Finance Institute® (CFI) is a leading financial analyst training company that provides career-focused financial modeling and valuation courses. CFI’s courses and certifications have been delivered to tens of thousands of individuals at the top universities, investment banks, accounting firms and operating companies in the world. Whether you are new to the corporate finance industry or an experienced professional, CFI training on financial modeling and valuation will help you master new skills, achieve professional goals, and advance your career. CFI courses are designed to provide you with in-demand industry knowledge, hands-on practice, and confidence that will help you stand out from competition and become a world-class financial analyst.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2017 MBA Courses for Finance Development Program Course Offerings and Descriptions
    2016-2017 MBA Courses for Finance Development Program Course Offerings and Descriptions Preparing Financial Professionals for Success 1.0 About Training The Street: Training The Street (TTS) offers state-of-the-art, instructor-led courses in capital markets, financial modeling and corporate valuation. Founded in 1999, TTS is the world’s leading financial learning services company offering targeted and customized training courses to corporate and educational clients. TTS’s corporate clients include the world’s leading investment banks, consulting firms & Fortune 500 companies. We specialize in applied learning using practical examples and annotated guides. With more than 150 years of combined professional and teaching experience, TTS's instructors have worked across a broad spectrum of industries-from high-technology to retail-and across a wide range of financial disciplines-from investment banking, accounting, and financial research to global trade finance and credit risk management. Several of our instructors are Adjunct Professors at leading academic institutions. For more information on TTS, please visit www.trainingthestreet.com. Calendar of Courses Offered: 2016-2017 Finance Development Program 1) Excel Best Practices – Friday, August 19, 2016 (5:00 – 9:00pm), Koury 2) Introduction to Financial Modeling – Friday, September 16, 2016 (1:00pm – 5:00pm), Kenan 204 3) M&A Strategy and Corporate Valuation – Saturday, September 24, 2016 (9:00am – 5:00pm), McColl 2250 4) Anatomy of a Deal – Saturday, October 1, 2016 (10:00am – 4:00pm), McColl 2500 5) LBO Modeling – Tuesday, October 25, 2016 (4:30pm – 8:30pm), McColl 2500 6) Restructuring and Credit Analysis – Friday, November 11, 2016 (9:00am – 5:00pm), McColl 2600 7) Interview Preparation: Private Equity – Saturday, December 3, 2016 (9:00am – 11:30pm), McColl 2500 8) Interview Preparation: Finance – Saturday, December 3, 2016 (12:00pm – 3:30pm), McColl 2500 Detailed course descriptions are on the following pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking Private Equity Characteristics and Implications by Asset Class
    Unpacking Private Equity Characteristics and Implications by Asset Class www.mccombiegroup.com | +1 (786) 664-8340 Unpacking Private Equity: Characteristics & implications by asset class The term private equity is often treated as a catchall, used interchangeably to describe a broad variety of investments. Such loose use of the phrase fails to capture the range of nuanced business ownership strategies it refers to and risks branding an entire asset class with characteristics and implications that are typically relevant to only a particular sub-category. Recently, this has especially been the case given the outsized global attention placed on the leveraged buyout deals of Bain Capital, a private equity firm founded by Republican U.S. presidential candidate Mitt Romney. In this context, popular discourse has inappropriately attached the label of private equity to a general practice of debt-fueled corporate takeovers that disproportionately focus on cost cutting. In reality, however, private equity refers to an array of investment strategies each with a unique risk-return profile and differing core skillsets for success. This article is intended to help family office executives better understand the nuances of the various sub-categories of private equity. It seeks to draw high-level distinctions, serving as a practical guide for investors entering the private equity arena, be it directly or through a more curated fund structure. Ultimately by understanding the characteristics and implications of each asset class, the reader should be equipped to make an educated choice regarding the most relevant and appropriate strategy for their unique profile. From a technical perspective, private equity is nothing more than making investments into illiquid non-publicly traded companies— i.e.
    [Show full text]